Search

Intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA, pCCA, dCCA) are highly malignant tumours with increasing mortality rates due to therapy resistances. Among the mechanisms mediating resistance, overexpression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins (Bcl-2, Bcl-x(L), Mcl-1) is particularly important. In this study, we investigated whether antiapoptotic protein patterns are prognostically relevant and potential therapeutic targets in CCA. Bcl-2 proteins were analysed in a pan-cancer cohort from the NCT/DKFZ/DKTK MASTER registry trial (n = 1140, CCA n = 72) via RNA-sequencing and transcriptome-based protein activity interference revealing high ranks of CCA for Bcl-x(L) and Mcl-1. Expression of Bcl-x(L), Mcl-1, and Bcl-2 was assessed in human CCA tissue and cell lines compared with cholangiocytes by immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting, and quantitative-RT-PCR. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the upregulation of Bcl-x(L) and Mcl-1 in iCCA tissues. Cell death of CCA cell lines upon treatemnt with specific small molecule inhibitors of Bcl-x(L) (Wehi-539), of Mcl-1 (S63845), and Bcl-2 (ABT-199), either alone, in combination with each other or together with chemotherapeutics was assessed by flow cytometry. Targeting Bcl-x(L) induced cell death and augmented the effect of chemotherapy in CCA cells. Combined inhibition of Bcl-x(L) and Mcl-1 led to a synergistic increase in cell death in CCA cell lines. Correlation between Bcl-2 protein expression and survival was analysed within three independent patient cohorts from cancer centers in Germany comprising 656 CCA cases indicating a prognostic value of Bcl-x(L) in CCA depending on the CCA subtype. Collectively, these observations identify Bcl-x(L) as a key protein in cell death resistance of CCA and may pave the way for clinical application.

Locally advanced oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains difficult to treat because of common resistance to neoadjuvant therapy and high recurrence rates. The ecological and evolutionary dynamics responsible for treatment failure are incompletely understood. Here, we performed a comprehensive multi-omic analysis of samples collected from EAC patients in the MEMORI clinical trial, revealing major changes in gene expression profiles and immune microenvironment composition that did not appear to be driven by changes in clonal composition. Multi-region multi-timepoint whole exome (300x depth) and paired transcriptome sequencing was performed on 27 patients pre-, during and after neoadjuvant treatment. EAC showed major transcriptomic changes during treatment with upregulation of immune and stromal pathways and oncogenic pathways such as KRAS, Hedgehog and WNT. However, genetic data revealed that clonal sweeps were rare, suggesting that gene expression changes were not clonally driven. Additional longitudinal image mass cytometry was performed in a subset of 15 patients and T-cell receptor sequencing in 10 patients, revealing remodelling of the T-cell compartment during treatment and other shifts in microenvironment composition. The presence of immune escape mechanisms and a lack of clonal T-cell expansions were linked to poor clinical treatment response. This study identifies profound transcriptional changes during treatment with limited evidence that clonal replacement is the cause, suggesting phenotypic plasticity and immune dynamics as mechanisms for therapy resistance with pharmacological relevance.

Introduction: Gemcitabine and cisplatin is the standard first-line systemic treatment in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). However, a substantial number of patients do not qualify for cisplatin due to comorbidities or poor performance status. The phase II pilot study NACHO evaluated the efficacy of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) given on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks as first-line therapy in patients with advanced CCA ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with any comorbidity precluding cisplatin therapy, such as renal impairment, impaired hearing, increased risk or history for thromboembolic events, intolerance of extensive hydration, or significant cardiovascular disease were eligible. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and patient reported outcome. Results: From December 2016 to July 2017, 10 patients were prospectively enrolled and treated. The ORR with nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine was 50%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 90%. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.3–6.1), and median OS was 7.8 months (95% CI: 5.4–10.2). In total, 13 SAEs were documented without any new safety signals. There were 14 grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in 10 patients of the ITT population. Exploratory subgroup analyses including known prognostic markers were performed. Conclusions: The NACHO trial supports safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced CCA ineligible for cisplatin-based therapy and should be further evaluated in a larger prospective trial.

In the setting of ongoing SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, vaccine-related tracer uptake in locoregional lymph nodes has become a well-known issue in tumor staging by

Intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA, pCCA, dCCA) are highly malignant tumours with increasing mortality rates due to therapy resistances. Among the mechanisms mediating resistance, overexpression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins (Bcl-2, Bcl-x

PURPOSE When brain cancer relapses, treatment options are scarce. The use of molecularly matched targeted therapies may provide a feasible and efficacious way to treat individual patients based on the molecular tumor profile. Since little information is available on this strategy in neuro-oncology, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical course of 41 patients who underwent advanced molecular testing at disease relapse. METHODS We performed Sanger sequencing, targeted next generation sequencing, and immunohistochemistry for analysis of potential targets, including programmed death ligand 1, cyclin D1, phosphorylated mechanistic Target of Rapamycin, telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B deletion, or BRAF-V600E mutation. In selected patients, whole exome sequencing was conducted. RESULTS The investigation included 41 patients of which 32 had isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype glioblastoma. Molecular analysis revealed actionable targets in 31 of 41 tested patients and 18 patients were treated accordingly (matched therapy group). Twenty-three patients received molecularly unmatched empiric treatment (unmatched therapy group). In both groups, 16 patients were diagnosed with recurrent IDH wildtype glioblastoma. The number of severe adverse events was comparable between the therapy groups. Regarding the IDH wildtype glioblastoma patients, median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were longer in the matched therapy group (mPFS: 3.8 versus 2.0 months, p = 0.0057; mOS: 13.0 versus 4.3 months, p = 0.0357). CONCLUSIONS These encouraging data provide a rationale for molecularly matched targeted therapy in glioma patients. For further validation, future study designs need to additionally consider prevalence and persistence of actionable molecular alterations in patient tissue.

SummaryLymphocyte contraction (LC) in central immune organs is a concomitant of sterile tissue injury, for example after stroke. Intestinal Peyer’s patches (PP) harbor large numbers of B cells, but how sterile tissue injury leads to LC in PP has not been explored. We observed rapid and macroscopically evident shrinkage of PP after stroke and myocardial infarction. Light-sheet fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry revealed a strong reduction in the number of PP-resident B cells. Mechanistically, tissue injury triggered the activation of neutrophils that released B cell-toxic neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) decorated with citrullinated histone-H3. Antibody-mediated or genetically induced neutrophil-loss, NETs-degradation or blockade of their generation completely reversed B cell loss and preserved the tissue architecture of PP. We also found NET-like elements in human post-stroke plasma. Hence, we propose that targeting NET-generation or -function counteracts post-injury B cell contraction in PP and thereby maintains immune homeostasis at mucosal barriers.In briefHigh numbers of B cells reside in the intestinal Peyer’s patches. Tuz et al. revealed that in response to sterile tissue injury, activated neutrophils release histone-decorated DNA into the circulation which induces B cell death. The loss of B cells results in the shrinkage of Peyer’s patches and reduced amounts of secretory IgA.HighlightsStroke and myocardial infarction induce the melting of Peyer’s patchLight-sheet microscopy and cytometry revealed B cell loss in Peyer’s patchPost-injury activated neutrophils release NETs and trigger B cell deathInhibition of NETs rescues B cell loss and degeneration of Peyer’s patch

TPS4183 Background: Overall survival remains low for pts with mPDAC despite approved therapies, highlighting the need for further innovative treatment options. Intra-tumoral fibrosis that characterizes PDAC has been associated with a state of immune exclusion and may constitute a mechanical obstacle to the intra-tumoral penetration of chemotherapy as well as contribute to the lack of efficacy of immunotherapy. TGF-β plays a key role in regulating the tumor microenvironment and emerging evidence points to its role as a pivotal activator of cancer-associated fibroblasts, leading to the development of fibrotic networks. Preclinical data in murine models have shown that TGF-β blockade augmented the antitumor activity of both NG and anti-PD-1 therapy, leading to tumor regression. These data provide the rationale for combining TGF-β-targeting agents with immunotherapy and chemotherapy. NIS793 is a human IgG2 mAb that binds to TGF-β. This study investigates NIS793 with and without spartalizumab (PD-1 antagonist) combined with NG in treatment naïve mPDAC. Methods: This is a phase II open-label, randomized, multicenter study (NCT04390763) beginning with a safety run-in period followed by randomization. Eligible pts are adults with previously untreated mPDAC and ECOG performance status score ≤1. Pts are excluded if they have a microsatellite-unstable tumor. The safety run-in data will be analyzed after ≥6 pts have received NIS793 (intravenously [IV] 2100 mg Q2W) + spartalizumab (IV 400 mg Q4W) + nab-paclitaxel (IV 125 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 and 15) + gemcitabine (IV 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 and 15) for 1 cycle (28 days) to assess the safety and tolerability of the combination. In the randomized part, pts will be randomized 1:1:1 to NIS793 + spartalizumab + NG (n = 50) or NIS793 + NG (n = 50) or NG (n = 50). Treatment will continue until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, discontinuation by investigator’s/pt’s choice, or withdrawal of consent. The primary objective is to evaluate the progression-free survival per RECIST 1.1, of NIS793 + NG ± spartalizumab versus NG alone. Secondary objectives include safety and tolerability, antitumor activity, overall survival, change in tumoral CD8 and PD-L1 status, and characterization of immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics. Efficacy will be assessed locally per RECIST v1.1 and iRECIST at screening, every 8 weeks for 1 year and then every 12 weeks until disease progression. Blood and tumor samples will be taken at baseline and during study treatment for pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity and biomarker assessments. This study is ongoing and will enroll pts from 31 sites across 14 countries. The first pt was treated on October 22, 2020. Enrollment for the randomized part of the study started on August 09, 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04390763.

Background and Aims Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease most often diagnosed after local progression or metastatic dissemination, precluding resection and resulting in a high mortality rate. For individuals with elevated personal risk of the development of pancreatic cancer, EUS is a frequently used advanced imaging and diagnostic modality. However, there is variability in the expertise and definition of EUS findings among gastroenterologists, as well as lack of standardized reporting of relevant findings at the time of examination. Adoption of standardized EUS reporting, using a universally accepted and agreed upon terminology, is needed. Methods A consensus statement designed to create a standardized reporting template was authored by a multidisciplinary group of experts in pancreatic diseases that includes gastroenterologists, radiologists, surgeons, oncologists, and geneticists. This statement was developed using a modified Delphi process as part of the Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection Consortium (PRECEDE) and >75% agreement was required to reach consensus. Results We identified reporting elements and present standardized reporting templates for EUS indications, procedural data, EUS image capture, and descriptors of findings, tissue sampling, and for postprocedural assessment of adequacy. Conclusions Adoption of this standardized EUS reporting template should improve consistency in clinical decision making for individuals with elevated risk of pancreatic cancer by providing complete and accurate reporting of pancreatic abnormalities. Standardization will also help to facilitate research and clinical trial design by using clearly defined and consistent imaging descriptions, thus allowing for comparison of results across different centers.

Objective: To evaluate a new electrocardiographic (ECG) score reflecting domains of electrical and structural alterations in therapy-naïve cancer patients to assess their risk of cardiotoxicity. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 134 therapy-naïve consecutive cancer patients in our two university hospitals concerning four ECG score parameters: Contiguous Q-waves, markers of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, QRS duration and JTc prolongation. Cardiotoxicity was assessed after a short-term follow-up (up to 12 months). Results: Of all the patients (n = 25), 19% reached 0 points, 50% (n = 67) reached 1 point, 25% (n = 33) reached 2 points, 5% (n = 7) reached 3 points and 0.7% reached 4 or 5 points (n = 1 respectively). The incidence of cardiotoxicity (n = 28 [21%]) increased with the ECG score, with 0 points at 0%, 1 point 7.5%, 2 points 55%, 3 points 71% and ≥3 points 50%. In the ROC (Receiver operating curves) analysis, the best cut-off for predicting cardiotoxicity was an ECG score of ≥2 points (sensitivity 82%, specificity 82%, AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.77–0.92, p < 0.0001) which was then defined as a high-risk score. High-risk patients did not differ concerning their age, LV ejection fraction, classical cardiovascular risk factors or cardiac biomarkers compared to those with a low-risk ECG score. Conclusion: ECG scoring prior to the start of anti-cancer therapies may help to identify therapy-naïve cancer patients at a higher risk for the development of cardiotoxicity.

The RADPAC trial evaluated paclitaxel with everolimus in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) who have progressed after therapy with a fluoropyrimidine/platinum-containing regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel (80 mg/m

Objective Measuring the success of molecularly guided therapies is a major challenge in precision oncology trials. A commonly used endpoint is an intra-patient progression-free survival (PFS) ratio, defined as the PFS interval associated with molecularly guided therapy (PFS2) divided by the PFS interval associated with the last prior systemic therapy (PFS1), above 1.3 or, in some studies, above 1.33 or 1.5. Methods To investigate if the concept of PFS ratios is in agreement with actual response evaluations by physicians, we conducted a survey among members of the MASTER (Molecularly Aided Stratification for Tumor Eradication Research) Programme of the German Cancer Consortium who were asked to classify the success of molecularly guided therapies in 194 patients enrolled in the MOSCATO 01 trial based on PFS1 and PFS2 times. Results A comparison of classification profiles revealed three distinct clusters of PFS benefit assessments. Only 29% of assessments were consistent with a PFS ratio threshold of 1.3, whereas the remaining 71% of participants applied a different classification scheme that did not rely on the relation between PFS times alone, but also took into account absolute PFS1 intervals. Based on these community-driven insights, we developed a modified PFS ratio that incorporates the influence of absolute PFS1 intervals on the judgement of clinical benefit by physicians. Application of the modified PFS ratio to outcome data from two recent precision oncology trials, MOSCATO 01 and WINTHER, revealed significantly improved concordance with physician-perceived clinical benefit and identified comparable proportions of patients who benefited from molecularly guided therapies. Conclusions The modified PFS ratio may represent a meaningful clinical endpoint that could aid in the design and interpretation of future precision oncology trials.

Precision oncology implies the ability to predict which patients will likely respond to specific cancer therapies based on high-resolution molecular diagnostics. The value of comprehensive molecular profiling based on whole-exome/genome sequencing (WES/WGS) and global RNA sequencing to guide therapeutic decisions in individual patients remains to be established. We report the results of MASTER (Molecularly Aided Stratification for Tumor Eradication Research), a multicenter registry trial for prospective, biology-driven stratification of younger adults with advanced-stage cancer across all histologies and patients with rare tumors conducted under the auspices of NCT Heidelberg/Dresden and the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK). Based on a standardized workflow for selection and consenting of patients, sample processing, WES/WGS and RNA sequencing, bioinformatic analysis, and technical validation of potentially actionable findings, we have analyzed more than 1300 poor-prognosis (median overall survival, 12 months) patients representing a broad spectrum of entities. Evaluation of the data by a cross-institutional molecular tumor board has allowed categorization into 7 different intervention baskets and formulation of evidence-based recommendations for clinical management in more than 80% of patients, which were implemented in approximately one third of cases. Overall response and disease control rates on molecularly guided treatment were significantly improved compared to prior systemic therapies, which translated into a progression-free survival (PFS) ratio of greater than 1.3 in more than 40% of cases. In 5% of patients, comprehensive genomic profiling allowed to refine the clinical diagnosis, as exemplified by several soft-tissue sarcomas not otherwise specified and carcinomas of unknown primary site that could be categorized based on their genotypes and subsequent histopathologic re-evaluation. Finally, systematic analysis of germline alterations revealed that 11% of patients had pathogenic (ACMG Class 4 or 5) variants in known tumor predisposition genes, and that 4% were carriers for autosomal recessive disorders. This prospective trial demonstrates that molecular profiling based on WES/WGS and RNA sequencing in a multi-institutional clinical setting is feasible, complements and advances routine molecular diagnostics, and creates clinically meaningful therapeutic opportunities in a significant proportion of patients. To improve clinical translation, the MASTER platform is now linked to a growing portfolio of cross-institutional basket trials. In the intermediate term, genomic profiling within MASTER will be integrated with additional layers of patient characterization and extended to additional treatment modalities (e.g. radiotherapy and surgical interventions). Citation Format: Peter Horak, Christoph Heining, Simon Kreutzfeldt, Christoph E. Heilig, Lino Möhrmann, Laura Gieldon, Martina Fröhlich, Sebastian Uhrig, Daniel Hübschmann, Katja Beck, Daniela Richter, Stephan Wolf, Katrin Pfütze, Christina Geörg, Bettina Meißburger, Frederick Klauschen, Sebastian Ochsenreither, Gunnar Folprecht, Jens Siveke, Sebastian Bauer, Thomas Kindler, Christian Brandts, Melanie Börries, Nikolas von Bubnoff, Karsten Spiekermann, Philipp J. Jost, Klaus Schulze-Osthoff, Michael Bitzer, Peter Schirmacher, Christof von Kalle, Richard Schlenk, Barbara Klink, Barbara Hutter, Wilko Weichert, Albrecht Stenzinger, Evelin Schröck, Benedikt Brors, Hanno Glimm, Stefan Fröhling. Clinical relevance of comprehensive genomic analysis in advanced-stage cancers and rare malignancies: Results from the MASTER trial of the German Cancer Consortium [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 468.