1. The design and analysis of a homeotic response element
- Author
-
Jenny J. Brookman, Graham Sproat, Simon E. Aspland, Lesley Clayton, and Robert A. H. White
- Subjects
Homeodomain Proteins ,Genetics ,Embryology ,animal structures ,Base pair ,fungi ,Nuclear Proteins ,Biology ,Response Elements ,DNA-binding protein ,DNA-Binding Proteins ,Repressor Proteins ,A-site ,Homeotic selector gene ,embryonic structures ,Animals ,Drosophila Proteins ,Insect Proteins ,Drosophila ,Binding site ,Hox gene ,Homeotic gene ,Ultrabithorax ,Transcription Factors ,Developmental Biology - Abstract
We have shown that the 26 bp bx1 element from the regulatory region of Distal-less is capable of imposing control by the homeotic genes Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A on a general epidermal activator in Drosophila . This provides us with an assay to analyze the sequence requirements for specific repression by these Hox genes. Both the core Hox binding site, 5′-TAAT, and the adjacent EXD 5′-TGAT core site are required for repression by Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A . The Distal-less bx1 site thus fits with the model of Hox protein binding specificity based on the consensus PBX/HOX-family site TGATNNAT[g/t][g/a], where the key elements of binding specificity are proposed to lie in the two base pairs following the TGAT. A single base pair deletion in the bx1 sequence generates a site, bx1:A − mut, that on the consensus PBX/HOX model would be expected to be regulated by the Deformed Hox gene. We observed, however, that the bx1:A − mut site was regulated predominantly by Sex combs reduced , Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A . The analysis of this site indicates that the specificity of action of Hox proteins may depend not only on selective DNA binding but also on specific post-binding interactions.
- Published
- 2000
- Full Text
- View/download PDF