Search

Patient-clinician goal concordance is associated with improved outcomes in certain chronic diseases but not explored in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We examined goal concordance, correlates of concordance, and the association of concordance with health outcomes.Adult patients with RA seen at least 1 time in the prior 12 months at 1 of 2 rheumatology clinics participated. Patients and their clinicians independently ranked top 3 goals for RA treatment from 8 options before a routine visit. Patients completed postvisit surveys on health, demographic information, health literacy, and adherence. Goal concordance was defined as the patient's number 1 goal being among the clinician's top 3 goals for that patient. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine correlates of concordance.Patients were 58% female and 16% Spanish-speaking, and 29% had limited health literacy. Among 204 patient-clinician dyads, 20% were goal-discordant. "Have less pain" was selected by both patient and clinician in 81% of dyads, followed by "have fewer problems doing daily activities" by 63%. Otherwise, clinicians prioritized avoiding side effects, whereas patients ranked improved sleep, fatigue, and mood. Longer disease duration was associated with discordance (median 13.3 years, interquartile range [IQR] 5.2-20 among discordant vs. 7 years, IQR 4-14; P = 0.039); higher depressive symptoms were associated with concordance (8.1% vs. 24%; P = 0.04). Goal concordance was associated with higher medication adherence (adjusted odds ratio 2.76 [95% confidence interval 1.01, 7.56]).One in 5 patient-clinician dyads had discordant treatment goals. Goal concordance was associated with higher medication adherence. Studies to improve goal elicitation and communication of patients with RA's priorities are needed.

Objective To develop an equity extension of the OMERACT Summary of Measurement Properties (SOMP) Table, SOMP Equity to describe whether a patient reported outcome measure (PROM) works well among patients of diverse languages and cultures, education levels, and other population characteristics. Methods We used the PROGRESS-Plus framework to categorize equity characteristics assessed in trials of PROM. PROGRESS refers to Place of residence, Race/ethnicity/culture/language, Occupation, Gender/sex, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, and Social Capital, while the ‘plus’ captures additional characteristics, such as age. We pilot tested our SOMP Equity Extension using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) as a prototypical PROM. Results The SOMP Equity Extension retains the same columns as the original OMERACT SOMP (domain match, feasibility, construct validity, test-retest reliability, longitudinal construct validity, clinical trial discrimination, thresholds of meaning) but uses the PROGRESS-Plus characteristics as rows. We found several examples of studies of the HAQ which had assessed one or more PROGRESS-Plus characteristics. Conclusions The most commonly reported equity considerations were related to language. OMERACT Equity virtual meeting participants were polled and they indicated that the SOMP Equity Extension is useful for highlighting and tracking equity considerations for OMERACT Core Outcome Measurement Instruments.

ObjectiveTreatment guidelines for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include a patient-centered approach and shared decision making, which includes a discussion of patient goals. We describe the iterative early development of a structured goal elicitation tool to facilitate goal communication for persons with RA and their clinicians.MethodsTool development occurred in 3 phases: (1) clinician feedback on the initial prototype during a communication training session; (2) semistructured interviews with RA patients; and (3) community stakeholder feedback on elements of the goal elicitation tool in a group setting and electronically. Feedback was dynamically incorporated into the tool.ResultsClinicians (n = 15) and patients (n = 10) provided feedback on the tool prototypes. Clinicians preferred a shorter tool deemphasizing goals outside of their perceived treatment domain or available resources; they highlighted the benefits of the tool to facilitate conversation but raised concerns regarding current constraints of the clinic visit. Patients endorsed the utility of such a tool to support agenda setting and preparing for a visit. Clinicians, patients, and community stakeholders reported the tool was useful but identified barriers to implementation that the tool could itself resolve.ConclusionA goal elicitation tool for persons with RA and their clinicians was iteratively developed with feedback from multiple stakeholders. The tool can provide a structured way to communicate patient goals within a clinic visit and help overcome reported barriers such as time constraints. Incorporating a structured communication tool to enhance goal communication and foster shared decision making may lead to improved outcomes and higher-quality care in RA.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In early 2020, the COVID-19 global pandemic shifted most healthcare to remote delivery methods to protect patients, clinicians, and hospital staff. Such remote care delivery methods include the use of telehealth technologies including clinical video telehealth or telephone visits. Prior to this, research on the acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy of telehealth applied to rheumatology, or telerheumatology, has been limited. RECENT FINDINGS: Telerheumatology visits were found to be noninferior to in-person visits and are often more time and cost effective for patients. Clinicians and patients both noted the lack of a physical exam in telehealth visits and patients missed the opportunity to have lab work done or other diagnostic tests they are afforded with in-person visits. Overall, patients and clinicians had positive attitudes toward the use of telerheumatology and agreed on its usefulness, even beyond the pandemic. SUMMARY: Although telerheumatology has the potential to expand the reach of rheumatology practice, some of the most vulnerable patients still lack the most basic resources required for a telehealth visit. As the literature on telerheumatology continues to expand, attention should be paid to health equity, the digital divide, as well as patient preferences in order to foster true shared decision-making over telehealth.

To assess rheumatologists' views and practices related to shared decision-making (SDM) in gout treatment. We performed a cross-sectional electronic survey of rheumatologists at U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers, assessing views and practices related to SDM in gout. Of the 154 VA rheumatology providers eligible, 90 responded (response rate, 58%). Fifty-eight percent were female, the mean age was 51 years (standard deviation, 9.6), 42% had > 20 years of experience in medical practice. Rheumatologists reported routinely offering a choice to their patients for (1) starting urate-lowering therapy (ULT) for gout vs. doing nothing (70%); (2) choosing NSAIDs, corticosteroids, or colchicine for the treatment of acute flares (67%); and (3) choosing NSAIDs, corticosteroids, or colchicine for anti-inflammatory prophylaxis when starting ULT (51%). Very few rheumatologists offered choice regarding (4) choosing allopurinol vs. febuxostat as the first ULT (16%) and (5) taking daily ULT long-term vs. intermittently (15%). Rheumatologists perceived that a large proportion of patients were often or sometimes unsure of the best choice for these five decisions, 34%, 76%, 76%, 52%, and 54%, respectively. Similar proportions of rheumatologists felt that patients were uninformed about both medication benefits and risks, unclear about the personal importance of the benefits and risks, and unsupported in decision-making. For the five decisions respectively, rheumatologists supported SDM with patients in 76%, 56%, 58%, 27%, and 25%. The majority of VA rheumatologists incorporated SDM in several gout treatment decisions. Rheumatologists also recognized that patients need better support to participate in SDM in gout. Key Points: • Rheumatologists offered shared decision-making to gout patients for 3 key treatment decisions. • Rheumatologists perceived that many patients were unsure of the best choice for these decisions. • Rheumatologists felt that patients were uninformed about medication benefits/risks and unsupported in decision-making.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Implementing shared decision making (SDM) is a top international priority to improve care for persons living with rheumatoid arthritis. Using SDM tools such as decision aids improve patients’ knowledge and support communication with their clinicians on treatment benefits and risks. Despite calls for SDM in treat-to-target, studies demonstrating effective SDM strategies in rheumatology clinical practice are scarce. Our objective was to identify recent and relevant literature on SDM in rheumatoid arthritis. RECENT FINDINGS: We found a burgeoning literature on SDM in rheumatoid arthritis that tackles issues of implementation. Studies have evaluated the SDM process within clinical consultations and found that uptake is suboptimal. Trials of newly developed patient decision aids follow high methodological standards, but large-scale implementation is lacking. Innovative SDM strategies such as shared goals and preference phenotypes may improve implementation of treat-to-target approach. Research and patient engagement are standardizing measures of SDM for clinical uses. SUMMARY: Uptake of SDM in rheumatoid arthritis holds promise in wider clinicians’ and patients’ awareness, availability of decision aids, and broader treat-to-target implementation strategies such as the learning collaborative. Focused attention is needed on facilitating SDM among diverse populations and those at risk of poorer outcomes and barriers to communication.

OBJECTIVE: In rheumatoid arthritis, whether women are less likely to achieve low disease activity is unclear. We evaluated sex differences in remission and low disease activity, comparing different clinical and imaging measures.METHODS: We used data from the Veterans Affairs Rheumatoid Arthritis (VARA) registry and from 2 clinical trials. Remission and low disease activity were defined using composite scores, individual items (tender joints, swollen joints, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], C-reactive protein [CRP] level, and evaluator/patient global assessment), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the VARA registry, we assessed the likelihood of point remission at any time during follow-up using logistic regression, and time to sustained remission (2 consecutive visits) using Cox proportional hazards models. In the clinical trials, logistic regression models evaluated the likelihood of low clinical and MRI activity at 52 weeks.RESULTS: Among 2,463 patients in VARA, women (10.2%) were less likely to be in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)-ESR remission in follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 0.71 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.55-0.91]; P < 0.01) and had a longer time to sustained DAS28-ESR remission. This difference was not observed for DAS28-CRP, Clinical Disease Activity Index, or Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3. Women were more likely to achieve favorable individual components except for an ESR CONCLUSION: The comparison of remission rates between men and women varies based on the disease activity measure, with sex-specific differences in ESR resulting in reliably lower rates of remission among women. There were no differences in MRI measures.

ObjectiveTo evaluate levels of burnout and correlates of burnout among US rheumatology fellows.MethodsUS rheumatology fellows were invited to complete an electronic survey in 2019. Burnout was assessed using the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Measures of depression, fatigue, quality of life, and training year were also collected. Open-ended questions about perceived factors to promote resiliency and factors leading to increased burnout were included. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to examine correlates of burnout. Open-ended responses were analyzed using thematic analysis.ResultsThe response rate was 18% (105/582 pediatric and adult rheumatology fellows). Over one-third (38.5%) of postgraduate year (PGY) 4 and 16.7% of PGY5/6 fellows reported at least 1 symptom of burnout. Of PGY4 fellows, 12.8% met criteria for depression compared with 2.4% of PGY5/6 fellows. PGY4 fellows reported worse fatigue and poorer quality of life compared with PGY5/6. In multivariable models controlling for training year and gender, older age (> 31 years) was associated with lower odds of burnout. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses identified factors that help reduce burnout: exercise, family/friends, sleep, support at work, and hobbies. Factors contributing to burnout: pager, documentation, long hours, demands of patient care, and presentations and expectations.ConclusionThis national survey of US rheumatology fellows reveals that early trainee level and younger age are associated with worse levels of fatigue, quality of life, and burnout. Although awareness of and strategies to reduce burnout are needed for all fellows, targeted interventions for younger fellows and those in their first year of training may be of highest yield.

Objective.The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Shared Decision Making (SDM) Working Group aims to determine the core outcome domain set for measuring the effectiveness of SDM interventions in rheumatology trials.Methods.A white paper was developed to clarify the draft core domain set. It was then used to prepare for interviews to investigate reasons for lack of consensus on it and to suggest further improvements.Results.OMERACT scientists/clinicians (n = 13) and patients (n = 10) suggested limiting the core domain set to outcome domains, removing process domains, and clarifying remaining domains.Conclusion.A revised core domain set will undergo further consensus-building.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of direct acting anti-viral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection on changes in pain intensity and prescription opioid use among Veterans. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Veterans with HCV who were seen in a rheumatology clinic at least once while receiving DAA therapy between January 1, 2010 and December 31st 2016. Demographic characteristics, HCV status, HCV treatment characteristics, numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores and opioid prescription data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Pain scores were averaged over 6 months prior to HCV treatment and 6 months after completion of treatment. Prescription opioid dose was converted to a morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and averaged across the two 6-month intervals. Generalized estimating equations were used to model the change in average pain and MEDD from pre- to post-HCV treatment. Effect size was assessed using Cohen’s d. RESULTS: A total of 121 Veterans, 91% male with average age of 59 were included. Average pre-treatment pain was 4.4 (SD 2.4). The average reduction in pain scores was 0.6 points (P = 0.02, Cohen’s d = 0.22) after treatment. Among 67 patients prescribed chronic opioid therapy at baseline, average pre-treatment MEDD was 52.4 mg (SD = 62.5 mg) and post-DAA treatment average MEDD was 49.5 mg (SD = 69.3 mg), representing a decrease by 2.9 mg (P < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.14). Opioid dose reduction was seen in 43/67 patients and 12 patients discontinued opioids entirely. CONCLUSION: Among US Veterans, subjective pain scores had modest improvement and opioid prescriptions were mildly reduced following treatment with DAA.

Guidelines and recommendations developed and/or endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) are intended to provide general guidance for commonly encountered clinical scenarios. The recommendations do not dictate the care for an individual patient. The ACR considers adherence to the recommendations described in this guideline to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the clinicians in light of each patient’s individual circumstances. Guidelines and recommendations are intended to promote beneficial or desirable outcomes but cannot guarantee any specific outcome. Guidelines and recommendations developed and endorsed by the ACR are subject to periodic revision as warranted by the evolution of medical knowledge, technology, and practice. ACR recommendations are not intended to dictate payment or insurance decisions, or drug formularies or other third-party analyses. Third parties that cite ACR guidelines should state that these recommendations are not meant for this purpose. These recommendations cannot adequately convey all uncertainties and nuances of patient care. The American College of Rheumatology is an independent, professional, medical and scientific society that does not guarantee, warrant, or endorse any commercial product or service. OBJECTIVE. To develop updated guidelines for the pharmacologic management of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS. We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions. After conducting a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the certainty of evidence. A voting panel comprising clinicians and patients achieved consensus on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of recommendations. RESULTS. The guideline addresses treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including conventional synthetic DMARDs, biologic DMARDs, and targeted synthetic DMARDs, use of glucocorticoids, and use of DMARDs in certain high-risk populations (i.e., those with liver disease, heart failure, lymphoproliferative disorders, previous serious infections, and nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease). The guideline includes 44 recommendations (7 strong and 37 conditional). CONCLUSION. This clinical practice guideline is intended to serve as a tool to support clinician and patient decision-making. Recommendations are not prescriptive, and individual treatment decisions should be made through a shared decision-making process based on patients’ values, goals, preferences, and comorbidities.

Objective: To gain consensus on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) core domain set for rheumatology trials of shared decision making (SDM) interventions.Methods: The process followed the OMERACT Filter 2.1 methodology, and used consensus-building methods, with patients involved since the inception. After developing the draft core domain set in previous research, we conducted five steps: (i) improving the draft core domain set; (ii) developing and disseminating whiteboard videos to promote its understanding; (iii) conducting an electronic survey to gather feedback on the draft core domain set; (iv) finalizing the core domain set and developing summaries, a plenary session video and discussion boards to promote its understanding; and (v) conducting virtual workshops with voting to endorse the core domain set.Results: A total of 167 participants from 28 countries answered the survey (62% were patients/caregivers). Most participants rated domains as relevant (81%-95%) and clear (82%-93%). A total of 149 participants (n = 48 patients/caregivers, 101 clinicians/researchers) participated in virtual workshops and voted on the proposed core domain set which received endorsement by 95%. Endorsed domains are: 1-Knowledge of options, their potential benefits and harms; 2-Chosen option aligned with each patient's values and preferences; 3-Confidence in the chosen option; 4-Satisfaction with the decision-making process; 5-Adherence to the chosen option and 6-Potential negative consequences of the SDM intervention.Conclusion: We achieved consensus among an international group of stakeholders on the OMERACT core domain set for rheumatology trials of SDM interventions. Future research will develop the Core Outcome Measurement Set.Clinical significance: Prior to this study, there had been no consensus on the OMERACT core domain set for SDM interventions. The current study shows that the OMERACT core domain set achieved a high level of endorsement by key stakeholders, including patients/caregivers, clinicians and researchers.(c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Introduction The Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration (VA) Strategic Plan (Fiscal Year 2018–2024) identified four priorities for care including easy access, timely and integrated care, accountability, and modernization, all of which can be directly or indirectly impacted by telemedicine technologies. These strategic goals, coupled with an anticipated rheumatology workforce shortage, has created a need for additional care delivery methods such as clinical video telehealth application to rheumatology (ie, telerheumatology). Rheumatology clinician perceptions of clinical usefulness telerheumatology have received limited attention in the past. The present study aimed to evaluate rheumatologists’ perceptions of and experiences with telemedicine, generally, and telerheumatology, specifically, within the VA. Materials and Methods A 38-item survey based on an existing telehealth providers’ satisfaction survey was developed by two VA rheumatologists with experience in telemedicine as well as a social scientist experienced in survey development and user experience through an iterative process. Questions probed VA rheumatology clinician satisfaction with training and information technology (IT) supports, as well as barriers to using telemedicine. Additionally, clinician perceptions of the impact and usefulness of and appropriate clinical contexts for telerheumatology were evaluated. The survey was disseminated online via VA REDCap to members of the VA Rheumatology Consortium (VARC) through a LISTSERV. The study protocol was approved by the host institution IRB through expedited review. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Forty-five anonymous responses (20% response rate) were collected. Of those who responded, 47% were female, 98% were between 35 and 64 years old, 71% reported working at an academic center, and the majority was physician-level practitioners (98%). Respondents generally considered themselves to be tech savvy (58%). Thirty-six percent of the sample reported past experience with telemedicine, and, of those, 29% reported experience with telerheumatology specifically. Clinicians identified the greatest barrier to effective telerheumatology as the inability to perform a physical exam (71%) but agreed that telerheumatology is vital to increasing access to care (59%) and quality of care (40%) in the VA. Overall, regardless of experience with telemedicine, respondents reported that telerheumatology was more helpful for management of rheumatologic conditions rather than initial diagnosis. Conclusions While the majority of rheumatology clinicians did not report past experience with telerheumatology, they agreed that it has potential to further the VA mission of improved access and quality of care. Rheumatology clinicians felt the suitability of telerheumatology is dependent on the phase of care. As remote care technologies continue to be rapidly adopted into clinic, clinician perceptions of and experiences with telemedicine will need to be addressed in order to maintain high-quality and clinician- and patient-centric care within VA rheumatology.

Objective.Depression is common in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), exacerbates disease activity, and may decrease response to first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. This study aimed to determine if depression affects disease activity among veterans with early RA prescribed methotrexate (MTX).Methods.Participants included veterans enrolled in the Veterans Affairs Rheumatoid Arthritis (VARA) registry with early RA (onset < 2 yrs) prescribed MTX. Depression was assessed at enrollment using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision codes (296.2–296.39, 300.4, 311). Disease activity was measured using the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and other core measures of RA disease activity. Propensity score weights were used to adjust depressed (n = 48) and nondepressed (n = 220) patients on baseline confounders within imputed datasets. Weighted estimating equations were used to assess standardized mean differences in disease activity between depressed and nondepressed patients at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups.Results.The analytic sample was composed of 268 veterans with early RA prescribed MTX who were predominantly male (n = 239, 89.2%) and older (62.7 yrs, SD 10.6) than patients with RA in the general population. Adjusted estimates indicated that depression was associated with significantly higher DAS28 at 6 months (β 0.35, 95% CI 0.01–0.68) but not at the 1- or 2-year follow-up. Also, depression was associated with significantly worse pain at 6 months (β 0.39, 95% CI 0.04–0.73) and 1 year (β 0.40, 95% CI 0.04–0.75).Conclusion.In early RA, depression is associated with greater short-term disease activity during MTX treatment, as well as more persistent and severe pain.

May 2020, the COVID‐19 pandemic continues to unfold. Governments are investing in public health, clinical and research efforts to avoid the spread of the SARS‐CoV‐2 virus, reduce the number of deaths and prevent the collapse of health care systems. However, this pandemic will have unprecedented consequences for people who live with chronic conditions for the months and even years to come without coordinated actions.

Objective.Despite advances integrating patient-centered outcomes into rheumatologic studies, concerns remain regarding their representativeness across diverse patient groups and how this affects equity. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Equity Working Group aims to determine whether and how to address equity issues within the core outcome sets of domains and instruments.Methods.We surveyed current and previous OMERACT meeting attendees and members of the Campbell and Cochrane Equity Group regarding whether to address equity issues within the OMERACT Filter 2.0 Core Outcome Sets and how to assess the appropriateness of domains, instruments, and measurement properties among diverse patients. At OMERACT 2016, results of the survey and a narrative review of differential psychosocial effects of rheumatoid arthritis (i.e., on men) were presented to stimulate discussion and develop a research agenda.Results.We proposed 6 moments for which an equity lens could be added to the development, selection, or testing of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM): (1) recruitment, (2) domain selection, (3) feasibility in diverse settings, (4) instrument validity, (5) thresholds of meaning, and (6) consideration of statistical power of subgroup analyses for outcome reporting.Conclusion.There is a need to (1) conduct a systematic review to assess how equity and population characteristics have been considered in PROM development and whether these differences influence the ranking of importance of outcome domains or a patient’s response to questionnaire items, and (2) conduct the same survey described above with patients representing groups experiencing health inequities.

Purpose Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is distinguishable from suicide attempts (SAs) on a number of psychological and motivational factors. However, in corrective services settings, NSSI and SA are not clearly distinguished in assessment impacting on intervention. The purpose of this paper is to examine if any attributes differentiate lifetime history of SA+NSSI, NSSI and SA presentations in inmates who had recently been assessed in custody by a risk intervention team. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive clinical assessment and file review was conducted with 87 male inmates (including a no self-injury control group) in two large correctional centres in New South Wales, Australia, to determine if three self-injury groups differ from the control group and if the three self-injury groups differ from each other across a range of static, trait, environmental and clinical characteristics. Findings The SA+NSSI group was most different from the control group (27/59 variables), and from the SA group (10/59 variables), predominantly across trait and clinical correlates. The SA group was least different from the control group (2/59 variables: suicide ideation, childhood physical abuse). Originality/value It was found that the presence of SA+NSSI history is an indicator of increased psychopathology. A history of SA only appears not readily associated with psychopathology. The self-injury subgroups reflected different clinical profiles with implications for risk assessment and treatment planning.

OBJECTIVE Many veterans enrolled in Veterans Affairs (VA) health care systems also receive care through other health care systems. Both VA and non-VA health care use must therefore be considered when conducting research in this population. This study characterized dual-care utilization in veterans with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and explored associations with RA disease activity. METHODS Through a questionnaire mailed to RA patients at 3 VA sites, veterans reported medical services by non-VA primary care and subspecialty providers, comorbidities, non-VA medications, and hospitalizations. Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) and Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MD-HAQ) scores were recorded during VA clinic visits, and respondent groups were compared. RESULTS Of the 510 participants surveyed, 318 (62%) responded. Respondents were older (ages 69 versus 66 years; P = 0.006), more likely nonsmokers (80% versus 67%; P = 0.001), and had lower disease activity (DAS28 3.3 versus 3.8; P

Background Medication decision-making is challenging in lupus. No validated, effective decision-aids are available to assist patients with medication decision-making. Objectives Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of an individualized, culturally-tailored, computerized decision-aid for immunosuppressive medications for lupus nephritis. Methods In a multicenter, randomized controlled trial, diverse adult women with lupus nephritis, largely racial/ethnic minorities with low socio-economic status, were randomized to decision-aid vs. American College of Rheumatology lupus pamphlet (1:1 ratio). Co-primary outcomes were change in decisional conflict and informed choice regarding immunosuppressive medications. Results Of 301 randomized women, 47% were African-American, 26% were Hispanic, and 15% White. Mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 37 (12) years, 57% had annual income of Conclusion An individualized decision-aid was effective in reducing decisional conflict for immunosuppressive medications in diverse women with lupus nephritis. Disclosure of Interests jasvinder singh Shareholder of: Amarin pharmaceuticals and Viking therapeutics, Consultant for: Crealta/Horizon, Fidia, UBM LLC, Medscape, WebMD, the National Institutes of Health and the American College of Rheumatology, Liana Fraenkel: None declared, Candace Green: None declared, Graciela S Alarcon: None declared, Jennifer Barton: None declared, Kenneth Saag Grant/research support from: Amgen, Ironwood/AstraZeneca, Horizon, SOBI, Takeda, Consultant for: Abbvie, Amgen, Ironwood/AstraZeneca, Bayer, Gilead, Horizon, Kowa, Radius, Roche/Genentech, SOBI, Takeda, Teijin, Leslie Hanrahan: None declared, Sandra Raymond: None declared, Robert Kimberly: None declared, Amye Leong: None declared, Elyse Reyes: None declared, Richard Street: None declared, Maria Suarez-Almazor : None declared, Guy Eakin: None declared, Laura Marrow: None declared, Charity Morgan: None declared, Brennda Caro: None declared, Jeffrey Sloan: None declared, Bochra Jandali: None declared, Salvador Garcia: None declared, Jennifer Grossman: None declared, Kevin Winthrop Consultant for: Gilead, Galapagos, Eli Lilly and Company, Abbvie, Pfizer, GSK, Laura Trupin: None declared, Maria Dall’Era Grant/research support from: University has received funds to serve as a site on this clinical study, Consultant for: On Data Monitoring Committee for Janssen, Biogen, and Genentech; on Steering Committee for EMD Serono., Alexa Meara: None declared, Tara Rizvi: None declared, Winn Chatham: None declared, Jinoos Yazdany Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant for: AstraZeneca

Background: Depression is common in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and exacerbates disease activity and may reduce response to first-line disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Objectives: To determine whether depression affects disease activity in patients with early RA treated with methotrexate (MTX). Methods: Patients in the Veterans Affairs Rheumatoid Arthritis registry with early RA (onset Results: Depression was associated with significantly greater DAS-28 at 6 months (β=0.36; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.69) but not at 1- or 2-years follow-up (Table 1). Associations for DAS-28 component measures were smaller in magnitude, decreased over time, and not statistically significant. Depression was also associated with significantly greater pain at both 6 months (β=0.47; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.82) and 1-year (β=0.42; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.82) follow-up but not the PRGA or MDHAQ at any assessed time interval. Conclusion: Findings demonstrate that depression is associated with less robust short-term response to MTX, and despite clinical RA treatment, more persistent and severe pain. Depression in RA patients may be a risk factor for primary non-response to MTX treatment, and interventions targeted at treating depression could result in better initial RA disease control and DMARD persistence. Acknowledgement: This material is based on upon work supported (or supported in part) by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, VA Maryland Health Care System, and Baltimore VA Medical Center. Disclosure of Interests: Alan Rathbun: None declared, Bryant England: None declared, Ted Mikuls: None declared, Alice Ryan: None declared, Jennifer Barton: None declared, Michelle Shardell: None declared, Joseph Gallo: None declared, Elizabeth Stuart: None declared, Marc Hochberg Shareholder of: BriOri Biotech, Theralogix LLC., Consultant for: Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Inc., Samumed LLC, Symic Bio Inc., Theralogix LLC, TissueGene Inc., TLC Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Zynerba, Galapagos, IQVIA, Hoffman LaRoche.

Background The Veterans Affairs (VA) Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (VARA) registry is an observational cohort study of US Veterans with RA at 11 VA Medical Centers. VARA investigators capture clinical and laboratory disease activity measures (DAMs) during clinic visits via standardized templates in the electronic health record (EHR). Six clinical (tender/swollen joints, patient/provider global, MD-HAQ, pain) and 2 laboratory (ESR, CRP) DAMs are extracted post-visit using natural language processing (NLP). Objectives This analysis determined the impact of an audit, feedback and data correction system on the quantity and quality of DAMs collected in the VARA registry. Methods After September 2017, VARA site investigators were provided monthly feedback reports of incomplete/missing DAMs for the prior month to allow sites to correct data entry errors. Updated and/or corrected data were entered into the EHR via note addendums and then automatically re-extracted by NLP to complete the capture of DAM data. DAMs from October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017 (pre-feedback implementation – Pre-IMP) was compared to October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018 (post-feedback implementation – Post-IMP). Results During the pre-IMP period, there were 2,411 notes with DAMs collected on 1,116 unique patients compared to 2,873 notes on 1,208 unique patients in the post-IMP period - an increase of 92 (8.2%) unique patients and 460 (19.1%) notes. Enrollment in the VARA registry only increased by 121 (6.5%) during post-IMP period. During post-IMP period, there were 541 notes identified with deficiencies in clinical DAMs and monthly audit and feedback reports were provided to VARA sites to allow corrections. Individual site review resulted in 376 additional DAMs in 225 notes, with complete resolution of all error in 137 (25.3%) notes. The quantity of DAMs collected increased from 15,709 to 21,064, a 34.1% increase with the average number of DAMs collected per note rising from 4.9 to 5.6. The quality of data improved as demonstrated by the proportion of notes with all 6 clinical DAMs increasing from 52.5% to 81.1% and other improvements in quality/completeness as noted in table. Conclusion An audit, feedback, and efficient data collection system improved both the quantity and quality of DAMs collected. The improvement in the collection of DAMs in RA patients will further enhance epidemiologic and outcomes studies of RA and provide higher quality longitudinal data to enhance the care of RA patients. References [1] Fed Pract 2015; 32(5):24-29 Acknowledgement Work Support in Part by VA HSR&D and VA Specialty Care Centers of Innovation Disclosure of Interests Grant Cannon Grant/research support from: Amgen Inc., Jorge Rojas: None declared, Neill Bell: None declared, Namrata Singh: None declared, Ted Mikuls: None declared, Liron Caplan: None declared, Gail Kerr: None declared, Joshua Baker: None declared, Angelo Gaffo: None declared, Jennifer Barton: None declared, Deana Lazaro: None declared, J Steuart Richards: None declared, Brian Sauer Grant/research support from: Amgen Inc.

Background Treatment decision-making regarding immunosuppressive therapy is challenging for individuals with lupus. We assessed the effectiveness of a decision aid for immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis. Methods and findings In a United States multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT), adult women with lupus nephritis, mostly from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds with low socioeconomic status (SES), seen in in- or outpatient settings, were randomized to an individualized, culturally tailored, computerized decision aid versus American College of Rheumatology (ACR) lupus pamphlet (1:1 ratio), using computer-generated randomization. We hypothesized that the co-primary outcomes of decisional conflict and informed choice regarding immunosuppressive medications would improve more in the decision aid group. Of 301 randomized women, 298 were analyzed; 47% were African-American, 26% Hispanic, and 15% white. Mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 37 (12) years, 57% had annual income of, Jasvinder Singh and colleagues reveal how a decision aid helps women with lupus to make decisions about immunosuppressive therapy., Author summary Why was this study done? Lupus kidney disease is a serious immune system condition that can lead to kidney failure and dialysis in young women, if not treated appropriately. Effective treatment with immune-blocking medicines is available, but patients report difficulty making informed decisions that weigh benefits and risks, such as side effects. No patient decision aids are available for lupus medication decision-making. The research team made an online decision aid for women with lupus kidney disease, with extensive input from individuals with lupus. The aid can be individualized to help patients make informed decisions about immune-blocking medicines for lupus. What did the researchers do and find? In 301 women with lupus kidney disease across four centers, researchers assessed whether an online decision aid improved lupus treatment decisions, compared with the use of a paper pamphlet on lupus kidney disease from the American College of Rheumatology. Compared with women who received the lupus pamphlet, women who used the decision aid reported feeling less doubt about their medication choice. More women who used the online decision aid said that the information source was easy to use, compared with women who used the lupus pamphlet. What do these findings mean? This study provides evidence that a decision aid for women with kidney disease may help patients feel more confident in their treatment choices.

Objective During the clinical encounter, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient goals for care often go unexplored. The aim of the present systematic review was to identify needs, goals and expectations of RA patients in order better to guide systematic elicitation of patient goals in clinical encounters. Methods An academic librarian searched MEDLINE, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library using a specialized algorithm developed to identify articles about patient goals for RA care. Investigators screened search results according to prespecified inclusion criteria and then reviewed included articles and synthesized the evidence qualitatively, utilizing an inductive approach. Results A total of 909 titles were retrieved in the literature search, of which 871 were excluded after a title/abstract screen. Of the remaining 38, 22 papers were included in the final review. Investigators identified four major themes in the literature: (a) the bodily experience of RA; (b) achieving normalcy and maintaining wellness; (c) social connectedness and support; and (d) interpersonal and healthcare system interactions. Conclusion Patients' goals when receiving care for RA are multidimensional and span several facets of everyday life. Goals for RA care should be collaboratively developed between patients and providers, with particular attention to the patient's life context and priorities.

In the last two decades, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have witnessed an expansion in the number and nature of treatment options available. The FDA has approved more than 10 new disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) since the late 1990s. These innovations and treat-to-target strategies have improved the likelihood of achieving remission, and, perhaps, improved survival (1). This progress, however, has introduced high complexity for patients and clinicians with respect to deciding which agents to use. Technical approaches to the selection of DMARDs such as guidelines appear inadequate, as they may not align with patient expectations, goals, and preferences for treatment or with personal and social contexts. This may lead to poor adherence, which, like many other chronic diseases, is inadequate in RA: adherence rates for biologic DMARDs are often less than 60% (2). Such alignment of guidelines with patient goals and preferences is only possible with patient involvement in the decision making process, a national and international policy priority (3–6). We have found that nearly one-third of adults with RA report suboptimal shared decision-making (SDM) communication with their clinicians (7), and patients with lower education, limited health literacy, lower trust in physician, and limited English language proficiency are more likely to report suboptimal SDM. Thus, lack of clear communication in these conversations may contribute to health disparities (8, 9). In particular, RA patients who are non-white, immigrants, or who have limited English language proficiency have higher disease activity and poorer function despite access to effective therapies (10). Limited health literacy has also been associated with greater disability in RA (11). SDM requires that patients and clinicians share information about safety, efficacy, and treatment burden of available options. Central to SDM is ensuring that patients have basic knowledge of RA and its treatment, which has been shown to be suboptimal in vulnerable populations (12). Clinicians are called upon to communicate this information in environments often constrained by time and competing tasks. In addition, they must make special effort to reach those with barriers to communication. Thus, efforts to improve RA outcomes may involve imparting knowledge and promoting patient engagement using efficient, low literacy approaches that reduce, rather than exacerbate, disparities in care. Given increasing demands on patients and clinicians, evidence of suboptimal SDM, and gaps in patient knowledge, we designed a literacy appropriate medication guide and decision aid (RA Choice). RA Choice was created to facilitate conversation between patients and clinicians about RA medications (13) and support SDM with patients who experienced an inadequate response to methotrexate monotherapy. Developed in three languages, the tools are aimed at populations with barriers to communication. We then performed a pilot study to assess feasibility and acceptability and the tools’ impact on knowledge of RA medications and decisional conflict among a diverse population in two urban rheumatology clinics.

OBJECTIVE Despite advances in therapies, disparities in outcomes have been documented for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients for both ethnicity and English language proficiency. The goals of these analyses were to compare differences in RA patient-reported outcomes, by both self-identification of ethnicity and English language proficiency, and to identify factors that might explain differences among groups. METHODS Data were collected through structured telephone interviews of a longitudinal cohort with physician-diagnosed RA (n = 438); only women were included (n = 335). Three groups were defined based on self-reported ethnicity and English proficiency: white/English (n = 219), Hispanic/English (n = 39), and Hispanic/Spanish (n = 77). Outcomes examined were patient-reported physical functioning, pain, and presence of moderate or severe fatigue. Multivariate regression analyses compared outcomes among groups, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, health and disease factors, and depression. RESULTS Hispanic/Spanish women had worse function, pain, and fatigue than either English-proficient group. Depression was associated with all outcomes (P < 0.0001), and accounted for greater differentials in scores than ethnicity/language proficiency. In interaction analyses, differences between women who were and were not depressed were greater for Hispanic/English than for Hispanic/Spanish. Nondepressed Hispanic/Spanish scores were significantly worse than nondepressed Hispanic/English, i.e., the impact of depression was less for Hispanic/Spanish women because both depressed and nondepressed women in this group reported worse outcomes. After adjustment for sociodemographic factors and depression, language remained significantly associated with outcomes. CONCLUSION Disparities in patient-reported outcomes may be driven less by ethnicity than by sociodemographic or psychological factors. Measurement instruments that are not culturally appropriate and equivalent may also hamper meaningful analyses of disparities.

Objective.Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients’ adherence to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) is often suboptimal. We examined associations among medication beliefs, self-efficacy, and adherence to medications in RA.Methods.Data were from a longitudinal observational cohort of persons with RA. Subjects completed telephone interviews on self-reported adherence, self-efficacy, demographics, and the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), which assesses beliefs in necessity and beliefs about taking medication. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression identified correlates of poor adherence to synthetic DMARD and prednisone as well as to biologic therapy, including medication concerns and necessity.Results.There were 362 patients who reported taking a synthetic DMARD and/or prednisone. Of these, 14% and 21% reported poor adherence to oral DMARD or prednisone, and biologics, respectively. There were 64% who reported concern about taking medicines, 81% about longterm effects, and 47% about becoming too dependent on medicines. In multivariate analyses, the BMQ necessity score was independently associated with better adherence to oral DMARD or prednisone (adjusted OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41–0.91), while self-efficacy was associated with greater odds of poor adherence to oral medications (adjusted OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01–1.59). Beliefs in medicines and self-efficacy were not associated with adherence to biologics.Conclusion.In a diverse cohort of patients with RA, stronger beliefs in the necessity of medication were associated with better adherence to oral DMARD or prednisone, while higher self-efficacy was associated with poor adherence. Providers can play important roles in eliciting patient beliefs about medications to improve adherence and ultimately health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Obese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be more likely to discontinue therapy than non-obese patients, possibly signifying a more refractory phenotype. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and discontinuation rates for different RA treatments accounting for confounding factors. METHODS: Veterans Affairs administrative databases were used to define initial courses of methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, prednisone, and self-injectable tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). Discontinuation was defined as a lapse in drug refill >90 days. Using overweight BMI (25–30 kg/m(2)) as the referent group, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations between BMI category and time to treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: There were 46,970 initial RA treatment courses identified from 2005–2014 among 23,669 Veterans with RA. In multivariable models, severe obesity (BMI >35 kg/m(2)), compared to overweight BMI, was not associated with treatment discontinuation with the exception of prednisone [HR 1.10 (1.04, 1.17) p

Objective Cross-sectional studies have observed that muscle weakness is associated with worse physical function among women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The present study examines whether reduced upper and lower extremity muscle strength predict declines in function over time among adult women with SLE.

Objective Family planning discussions are an important aspect of medical care for women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as active disease is a risk factor for poor pregnancy outcomes, and the medications used for treatment can be harmful to the fetus when used during conception and pregnancy. Our objective was to examine the impact of patient perception of quality and type of communication on receiving contraception counseling. Methods Data were derived from patients enrolled in the University of California, San Francisco Lupus Outcomes Study. Individuals participate in a yearly structured telephone interview that includes assessment of contraception counseling when starting new medications, and measures of communication and decision making. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of not receiving contraception counseling. Results Of the 68 women included in this analysis, one-third did not receive contraception counseling when starting new medications. Older age, white race, depressive symptoms, and higher SLE disease activity were independently associated with not receiving contraception counseling. Participants who did not receive contraception counseling rated their physicians lower in shared decision-making (SDM) communication. Conclusions This study demonstrates a gap in family planning counseling among women with SLE starting new medications. Future studies to address these potential areas of intervention, including education about the need for contraception through menopause, and mechanisms to engage in SDM surrounding contraception are needed to improve quality of care for women with lupus.

Objective Dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) are debilitating inflammatory myopathies associated with significant mortality. We evaluated the relative contribution of infection to hospital mortality in a large population-based study of individuals with PM/DM. Methods Data derive from the 2007 to 2011 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Samples and include all hospital discharges that met a validated administrative definition of PM/DM. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Variables for infections and comorbidities were generated from discharge diagnoses using validated administrative definitions. Logistic regression was used to investigate the relationship between infection and mortality in individuals with PM/DM, adjusting for sociodemographics, utilization variables, and comorbidities. Relative risks (RRs) were calculated to compare the overall prevalence of specific infections and associated mortality in PM/DM hospitalizations with those seen in the general hospitalized population. Results A total of 15,407 hospitalizations with PM/DM met inclusion criteria for this study and inpatient mortality was 4.5% (700 deaths). In adjusted logistic regression analyses, infection (odds ratio [OR] 3.4, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.9–4.0) was the strongest predictor of hospital mortality among individuals with PM/DM. Bacterial infection (OR 3.5, 95% CI 3.0–4.1), comprised primarily of pneumonia and bacteremia, and opportunistic fungal infections (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5–4.0) were independently associated with hospital mortality. The overall burden of infection in hospitalizations with PM/DM was significantly increased in comparison with the general hospitalized population (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4–1.6). Conclusion Among hospitalized individuals with PM/DM, infection is the leading cause of mortality. Strategies to mitigate infection risk in both the clinic and hospital settings should be evaluated to improve disease outcomes.

Objective.To understand the limitations with current patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) used to generate quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) in rheumatology, and set a research agenda.Methods.Two activities were undertaken. The first was a scoping review of published studies that have used PROM to generate QALY in rheumatology between 2011 and 2016. The second was an interactive “eyeball test” exercise at Outcome Measures in Rheumatology 13 that compared subdomains of widely used generic PROM, as identified through the scoping review, to subdomains of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis Health Index (ASAS-HI) condition-specific PROM for ankylosing spondylitis.Results.The scoping review included 39 studies. Five different PROM have been used to generate QALY in rheumatology; however, the EQ-5D and Short Form 6 Dimensions (SF-6D) were used most frequently (in 32 and 9 of included studies, respectively). Special interest group participants identified energy/drive and sleep as 2 key subdomains of the ASAS-HI instrument that may be missed by the EQ-5D, and sexual function as potentially missed by the SF-6D. Participants also expressed concerns that aspects of the process of care and non-health outcomes may be missed. Three ways of incorporating additional subdomains were discussed, including using an alternative generic PROM, modifying an existing generic PROM with “bolt-on” subdomain(s), and generating societal weights for a condition-specific PROM.Conclusion.Three priorities for future research were identified: understanding whether the EQ-5D and SF-6D identify what matters to patients with different rheumatic conditions, analyzing how much patients value process or non-health outcomes, and identifying which approaches to incorporating a greater number of subdomains into the QALY are being undertaken in other disease areas.

Objective.The aim of this Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Working Group was to determine the core set of outcome domains and subdomains for measuring the effectiveness of shared decision-making (SDM) interventions in rheumatology clinical trials.Methods.Following the OMERACT Filter 2.0, and based on a previous literature review of SDM outcome domains and a nominal group process at OMERACT 2014, (1) an online Delphi survey was conducted to gather feedback on the draft core set and refine its domains and subdomains, and (2) a workshop was held at the OMERACT 2016 meeting to gain consensus on the draft core set.Results.A total of 170 participants completed Round 1 of the Delphi survey, and 116 completed Round 2. Respondents came from 29 countries, with 49% being patients/caregivers. Results showed that 14 out of the 17 subdomains within the 7 domains exceeded the 70% criterion (endorsement ranged from 83% to 100% of respondents). At OMERACT 2016, only 8% of the 96 attendees were patients/caregivers. Despite initial votes of support in breakout groups, there was insufficient comfort about the conceptualization of these 7 domains and 17 subdomains for these to be endorsed at OMERACT 2016 (endorsement ranged from 17% to 68% of participants).Conclusion.Differences between the Delphi survey and consensus meeting may be explained by the manner in which the outcomes were presented, variations in participant characteristics, and the context of voting. Further efforts are needed to address the limited understanding of SDM and its outcomes among OMERACT participants.

The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the prevalence of comorbid Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and the association of PTSD with pain, disease activity, and medication use in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Veterans with one or more visit to an outpatient rheumatology clinic at a single Veterans Affairs site during a 2-year study period were identified by ICD codes for AS and included if there was documentation of AS diagnosis by a rheumatologist. Data were collected on PTSD diagnosis, demographics, pain scores, disease activity by the Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and medication use. Characteristics were compared by PTSD status using t tests for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fischer’s exact test for categorical variables. Of 113 Veterans with AS, 20 (18%) had a diagnosis of PTSD. Those with PTSD were significantly younger, 52 ± 17 years, as compared to those without PTSD, 59 ± 14 years (p = 0.04). BAS-DAI was recorded for 30% with a mean score of 4.3 ± 2.0. Those with PTSD had higher mean pain and BASDAI scores as compared to those without PTSD (p = 0.06 for both comparisons). Prescribed medications were similar for both groups in regards to synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologics, and opioids, although those with PTSD were significantly more likely to receive NSAIDs (p = 0.03). Veterans with AS and comorbid PTSD were younger and had higher reported pain and disease activity scores compared to those without PTSD in this single site study. These findings underscore the importance of identifying PTSD in patients with AS.

Objective Limited data exist describing relationships between muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical disability among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The present study examines the relationship of muscle strength and muscle mass with physical disability among adult women with SLE.

Electronic health record (EHR) implementation may affect patient-clinician communication for diverse safety-net populations. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of English-, Spanish-, and Cantonese-speaking patients in a public hospital clinic with a basic EHR. We examined multivariate associations of patient race/ethnicity, language, and education with perceptions of primary-care provider (PCP) computer use. Among 399 respondents, 25% had less than a high school education, 22% preferred Spanish, and 17% Cantonese. Asian (AOR 3.1), non-English-speakers (AOR 3.6) were more likely to report that PCPs used the computer half or more of the visit. Asians were more likely to report that computers helped PCPs remember patient concerns (AOR 5.6). Non-English-speakers had lower odds of reporting that PCPs listened less carefully to them because of computers (AOR 0.3). Patients at risk for communication barriers may perceive advantages of PCP computer use. Safety-net clinics should consider EHR impact on communication disparities.