Search

Immune checkpoint blockade combined with antiangiogenic therapy induces vascular normalization and antitumor immunity and is efficacious in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); but whether and how initial immunotherapy affects the efficacy of subsequent antiangiogenic therapy are unknown. We evaluated a cohort of HCC patients (n = 25) who received the pan–vascular endothelial growth factor receptor multikinase inhibitor sorafenib after initial therapy with an antiprogrammed cell death protein (PD)–1 antibody and found superior outcomes in these patients (12% overall response rate to sorafenib and a median overall survival of 12.1 months). To prove this potential benefit, we examined the impact of an anti–PD-1 antibody on response to subsequent sorafenib treatment in orthotopic models of murine HCC. Prior anti–PD-1 antibody treatment amplified HCC response to sorafenib therapy and increased survival (n = 8-9 mice per group, hazard ratio = 0.28, 95% confidence interval = 0.09 to 0.91; 2-sided P = .04). Anti–PD-1 therapy showed angioprotective effects on HCC vessels to subsequent sorafenib treatment, which enhanced the benefit of this therapy sequence in a CD8+ T-cell–dependent manner. This priming approach using immunotherapy provides an immediately translatable strategy for effective HCC treatment while reducing drug exposure.

Simple Summary The vascular endothelial growth factor and c-MET pathways are strongly implicated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Cabozantinib inhibits both pathways and has been approved in sorafenib-exposed advanced HCC (aHCC). We aimed to evaluate the real-life pattern of use, efficacy, and safety of cabozantinib in aHCC patients in a territory-wide study. In single-agent cabozantinib patients (n = 27), we found that 3.7% had a response, 44.4% had disease control, and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.28 months. Around 74.1% of patients had adverse events (AEs). We also did an exploratory analysis of patients who received cabozantinib as an add-on to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after progression on ICIs. Out of 15 such patients, 6.7% had a response and the median OS was 15.1 months, with 73.3% of patients having AEs. Overall, cabozantinib had good efficacy, survival, and safety in aHCC patients in a real-life setting. Abstract (1) Background: Cabozantinib is approved in sorafenib-exposed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). We evaluated the real-life pattern of use, efficacy, and tolerability of cabozantinib in aHCC. (2) Methods: This territory-wide study included consecutive aHCC patients who received cabozantinib between February 2018 and September 2020 in Hong Kong. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AE) were assessed. (3) Results: Overall, 42 patients were included. Approximately 83.3% had Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. About 64.3% received cabozantinib as a single agent, and the remaining 35.7% received cabozantinib as an add-on to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). For single-agent patients, the median follow-up was 6.7 months. The ORR was 3.7%, DCR was 44.4%, and the median OS was 8.28 months. About 74.1% of patients experienced any AEs with 7.4% having grade ≥3 AEs. Among patients who received prior ICIs (n = 16), the ORR was 6.3%, and the median OS was 8.28 months. An exploratory analysis of patients who received cabozantinib as an add-on to ICIs showed an ORR of 6.7% and a median OS of 15.1 months, with 73.3% having any AE and 13.3% having grade ≥3 AEs. (4) Conclusions: Cabozantinib had good anti-tumor activity, survival benefits, and acceptable tolerability in real-life aHCC patients.

The systemic treatment of advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has undergone an evolution in recent years. In March 2020, a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab was approved by the FDA for treatment of patients with advanced HCC who received prior sorafenib. This was based on the results of the phase I/II CheckMate-040 cohort 4 trials, which showed a promising overall response rate and encouraging overall survival with a manageable safety profile.This article reviews the pharmacology, efficacy and safety of nivolumab-ipilimumab in advanced HCC with prior sorafenib. Other existing systemic treatment options for advanced HCC will be described and compared to nivolumab-ipilimumab. Impact of different dose regimes, ongoing research and future developments of nivolumab-ipilimumab will be discussed. We focus on the analysis from the aforementioned CheckMate-040 cohort 4 registration trial.The approval of nivolumab-ipilimumab in the second-line treatment of advanced HCC by the FDA is an important development for treatment of advanced HCC. However, further investigations are needed to optimize dosing regimens and explore the use of nivolumab-ipilimumab in other combinations and settings.

e16179 Background: Cabozantinib is licensed for use as second- or third-line treatment for sorafenib-exposed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) based on the phase III CELESTIAL trial. However, its use in the post-immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) setting has yet to be described. We evaluated the pattern of use, efficacy, survival and tolerability of cabozantinib in aHCC patients with previous treatment by ICIs. Methods: We did a multi-centre, territory-wide study analysing aHCC patients who received cabozantinib after prior ICIs. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. Results: Thirty-one patients were included. The median age was 58.0 (range 41-85) and 77.4% had Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. 51.6% of patients received single agent cabozantinib and 48.4% received cabozantinib in combination with ICIs. ≥80% of patients received cabozantinib beyond the second-line and 93.5% of patients had prior TKIs. All patients received prior anti-PD-1 and 61.3% had prior anti-CTLA-4. The median follow-up was 15.2 months. For single agent cabozantinib patients, the ORR was 6.3%, DCR was 31.3% and median TTP was 3.5 months (95% C.I. 1.2-5.8). For cabozantinib-ICI combination patients, the ORR was 6.7%, DCR was 26.7% and median TTP was 2.3 months (95% C.I. 1.4-3.1). The overall median OS was 8.9 months (95% C.I. 5.7-11.9). Single agent cabozantinib patients had a significantly shorter OS compared to cabozantinib-ICI combination patients (8.3 months (95% C.I. 1.3-15.2) vs. 15.1 months (95% C.I. 11.1-19.2), p = 0.047). There was no significant difference in OS among patients with primary resistance to prior ICI regimes compared to those with acquired resistance (primary resistance 8.28 months (95% C.I. 5.04-11.5) vs. acquired resistance 8.90 months (95% C.I. 3.49-14.3), p = 0.472). Overall, 67.7% and 6.5% of patients experienced TRAEs of all grade and grade ≥3 respectively. The most common TRAE was hand-foot syndrome. 62.5% of single agent cabozantinib patients had any grade TRAE and no such patients had grade ≥3 TRAE. Conclusions: Cabozantinib had good anti-tumour activity and survival outcomes with acceptable toxicity in aHCC patients with previous treatment by ICIs.

e16181 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are widely adopted in contemporary advanced HCC (aHCC) treatment algorithms. Nevertheless, the optimal strategy for treatment after ICI exposure is unknown. We evaluated the pattern of use, response, survival and safety of TKIs in aHCC patients who previously received ICIs. Methods: We performed an international, multi-centre study of aHCC patients who received TKIs after prior treatment with ICIs. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AE) were assessed. Results: Between January 2015 and December 2020, one-hundred and forty-eight patients were included. The median age was 63 (range 29-84) and 78.4% were of Child-Pugh Grade A. 75.7% had hepatitis-B related HCC. 64.9% received TKI as single agent and 35.1% received TKI in combination with other agents. 75% who received TKI combinations had concomitant ICIs. 48.6% had prior TKIs. The median follow-up was 23.3 months. For single agent TKI patients, the ORR was 14.6%, DCR was 38.5%, median TTP was 3.9 months (95% C.I. 3.3-4.5) and median OS was 8.6 months (95% C.I. 5.8-11.4). For patients receiving TKI combinations, the ORR was 25%, DCR was 38.5%, median TTP was 3.5 months (95% C.I. 1.7-5.2) and median OS was 15.1 months (95% C.I. 5.7-24.5). There were no significant differences in ORR, DCR and median OS between patients who had primary resistance to prior ICI compared to those with acquired ICI resistance and between those who were TKI-naive compared to those who were TKI-exposed. Notably, patients who received TKI-ICI combinations had significantly superior survival compared to single agent TKI patients (median OS 15.1 months (95% C.I. 6.7-23.5) vs. 8.6 months (95% C.I. 5.6-11.7), p = 0.011) but not significantly superior ORR, DCR or TTP. Amongst patients who received single agent TKI and were naive to both sorafenib and lenvatinib, those who received lenvatinib had significantly superior DCR, TTP and OS compared to those who received sorafenib (DCR 51.5% vs 25.8%, p = 0.035; median TTP 6.3 months (95% C.I. 3.0-9.7) vs. 1.8 months (95% C.I. 0-3.6), p = 0.003; median OS 12.0 months (95% C.I. 7.0-17.0) vs. 5.9 months (95% C.I. 1.9-10.0), p = 0.008). 70.3% and 15.5% of all patients, and 77.1% and 15.6% of patients who received single agent TKI experienced all grade and grade ≥3 AEs respectively. The most common AEs were hand foot syndrome, skin rash and diarrhea. Conclusions: TKIs can achieve encouraging anti-tumour response and survival outcomes with acceptable safety in prior ICI-treated aHCC patients. Moreover, TKI-ICI combinations were associated with better survival than single agent TKIs. Notably, among patients who received single agent TKIs, lenvatinib had significantly better responses and survival results than sorafenib.

e16184 Background: Hepatic derangement commonly accompanies advanced HCC (aHCC) and limits the use of systemic therapies. We aimed to evaluate the use of single agent anti-PD-1 nivolumab or pembrolizumab in Child-Pugh (CP) grade B or C patients with aHCC. Methods: Consecutive aHCC patients with CP grade B (CPB) or C (CPC) liver function who received single agent nivolumab or pembrolizumab were analysed. Objective response rate (ORR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. Results: Between May 2015 and June 2020, 61 patients were included. The median age was 60 (range 28-82). 81% and 4.8% had hepatitis-B and hepatitis-C related HCCs respectively. 72.1% (n = 44) were of CPB and 27.9% (n = 17) were of CPC. Amongst CPB patients, 19 (31.1% of all patients) had CP score 7 (CP7) and 25 (41.0% of all patients) had CP score 8 or 9. The median follow-up was 2.3 months. The ORR of CPB and CPC patients were 6.8% and 0% respectively (p = 0.553). The TTP of CPB and CPC patients were 2.1 months (95% C.I. 1.4-2.8) and 1.4 months (95% C.I. 0.6-2.1) respectively (p = 0.204). CPB patients had significantly better OS than CPC patients (3.1 months (95% C.I. 1.4-4.7), vs. 1.7 months (95% C.I. 1.0-2.4), p = 0.041). Compared to CP score ≥8 (CP≥8) patients, CP7 patients had significantly better OS (median OS CP7 6.7 months (95% C.I. 4.0-9.3), vs. CP≥8 1.8 months (1.2-2.4), p = 0.002). Patients with diuretic-refractory ascites had significantly worse OS compared to those without (1.7 months (95% C.I. 1.0-2.5) vs. 3.7 months (95% C.I. 0.1-7.3), p = 0.004). Portal vein (PV) thrombosis was also significantly associated with inferior survival, with median OS of patients with any PV thrombosis being 1.8 months (95% C.I. 1.0-2.5), compared to 5.3 months (95% C.I. 2.4-8.1) of those without (p = 0.004). The median number of doses given was 3 (range 1-34). Median treatment duration was 5.0 weeks (range 0-77). Overall, 25.4% of patients experienced TRAEs and 4.8% experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were skin-related (13.1%) and constitutional symptoms (6.6%). Conclusions: Nivolumab/pembrolizumab had acceptable safety in CPB/C patients with aHCC. CP7, absence of diuretic-refractory ascites and lack of PV thrombosis were associated with better survival.

Simple Summary Hepatocellular carcinoma is an aggressive cancer with high mortality. The introduction of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed-cell death 1 pathway (PD-1/L1) has led to a paradigmatic change in the systemic treatment of HCC. However, the important challenges of how to predict who would respond to ICIs and how to further optimize treatment remain. Strategies are being explored using anti-PD-1/L1 as a staple in combination with other agents to improve outcomes. This includes, but is not limited to, targeting other immune-checkpoints and alternative pathways involved in HCC development. Furthermore, multiple biomarkers are under investigation to predict ICI responders. We discuss available studies and future prospects of ICI use in HCCs in these two directions. Abstract Advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma has a dismal outcome. Multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed-cell death 1 pathway (PD-1/L1) have been approved for the treatment of advanced HCC. However, outcomes remain undesirable and unpredictable on a patient-to-patient basis. The combination of anti-PD-1/L1 with alternative agents, chiefly cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) ICIs or agents targeting other oncogenic pathways such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway and the c-MET pathway, has, in addition to the benefit of directly targeting alterative oncogenic pathways, in vitro evidence of synergism through altering the genomic and function signatures of T cells and expression of immune checkpoints. Several trials have been completed or are underway evaluating such combinations. Finally, studies utilizing transcriptomics and organoids are underway to establish biomarkers to predict ICI response. This review aims to discuss the biological rationale and clinical advances in ICI-based combinations in HCCs, as well as the progress and prospects of the search for the aforementioned biomarkers in ICI treatment of HCC.

BackgroundProgrammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway blockade with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nowadays. No strategies to overcome ICI resistance have been described. We aimed to evaluate the use of ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 ICIs (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) combinations in patients with advanced HCC with progression on prior ICIs.MethodsPatients with advanced HCC with documented tumor progression on prior ICIs and subsequently received ipilimumab with nivolumab/pembrolizumab were analyzed. Objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response (DOR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed.ResultsTwenty-five patients were included. The median age was 62 (range: 51–83). About 68% were of Child-Pugh (CP) Grade A and 48% had primary resistance to prior ICI. At median follow-up of 37.7 months, the ORR was 16% with a median DOR of 11.5 months (range: 2.76–30.3). Three patients achieved complete response. The median TTP was 2.96 months (95% CI: 1.61 to 4.31). Median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 3.99 to 17.8) and the 1 year, 2 year and 3 year survival rates were 42.4%, 32.3% and 21.6%, respectively. The ORR was 16.7% in primary resistance group and 15.4% in acquired resistance group (p=1.00). All responders were of CP A and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) Grade 1 or 2. CP and ALBI Grades were significantly associated with OS (p=0.006 and pConclusionsIpilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab can achieve durable antitumor activity and encouraging survival outcomes with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced HCC who had prior treatment with ICIs.

330 Background: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway blockade with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is a standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nowadays. No strategies to overcome ICI resistance have been described. We aimed to evaluate the use of ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 ICIs (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) combinations in advanced HCC patients with progression on prior ICIs. Methods: Advanced HCC patients with documented tumour progression on prior ICIs and subsequently received ipilimumab with nivolumab/pembrolizumab were analysed. Objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response (DOR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. Results: Twenty-five patients were included. The median age was 62 (range 51-83). 68% were of Child-Pugh (CP) grade A and 48% had primary resistance to prior ICI. At median follow-up of 37.7 months, the ORR was 16% with a median DOR of 11.5 months (range 2.76-30.3). Three patients achieved complete response. The median TTP was 2.96 months (95% C.I. 1.61-4.31). Median OS was 10.9 months (95% C.I. 3.99-17.8) and the 1-year, 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 42.4%, 32.3% and 21.6% respectively. The ORR was 16.7% in primary resistance group and 15.4% in acquired resistance group (p=1.00). All responders were of CP A and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) grade 1 or 2. CP and ALBI grades were significantly associated with OS (p=0.006 and p

316 Background: In the phase III CELESTIAL trial, cabozantinib showed significant improvement in overall survival with good tolerability in advanced HCC population. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, survival and tolerability of cabozatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in a real life setting. Methods: Between February 2018 and October 2019, consecutive advanced HCC patients who received cabozatinib alone or in combination at University of Hong Kong Health System hospitals were analysed. Cabozantinib was administered at 60 mg continuously daily. Objective response rate (ORR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and tolerability were evaluated. Results: Overall, 22 patients were included. The median age was 57.1 years (range 48.5-58.6). All patients except one were hepatitis B carriers. More than 80% of the patients had underlying Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. Most patients had metastatic disease (95.5%). More than 70% of patients received cabozantinib beyond second-line, and most of the patients had prior exposure to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and/or immunotherapy. The median time from the start of first-line systemic treatment to the start of cabozantinib was 11.2 months. Cabozantinib was administered to 11 patients (50%) as single agent, while the other half received cabozantinib in combination with mostly immune checkpoint inhibitors. The median follow-up was 7.6 months. The table below shows the ORR. The overall median TTP and OS were 4.2 and 8.90 months, respectively. Interestingly, among those who received single agent cabozantinib, the median OS was 5.36 months in contrast to 12.32 months in the patients received combination. Overall, 90.9% of patients experienced treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) with transient liver function occurred in nearly 50% patients. Nevertheless, Grade 3/4 TRAEs was only 12%. Conclusions: Our present study showed that the use of cabozatinib in advanced HCC patients had good anti-tumour activity and survival benefits with acceptable toxicity profile. [Table: see text]