Search

Supplementary Figures S1-S5; Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Tables S1-S2.

Purpose: Chromosomal gain at 7q21 is a frequent event in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, this event has not been mapped with fine resolution in a large EAC cohort, and its association with clinical endpoints and functional relevance are unclear.Experimental Design: We used a cohort of 116 patients to fine map the 7q21 amplification using SNP microarrays. Prognostic significance and functional role of 7q21 amplification and its gene expression were explored.Results: Amplification of the 7q21 region was observed in 35% of tumors with a focal, minimal amplicon containing six genes. 7q21 amplification was associated with poor survival and analysis of gene expression identified cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) as the only gene in the minimal amplicon whose expression was also associated with poor survival. A low-level amplification (10%) was observed at the 12q13 region containing the CDK6 homologue cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4). Both amplification and expression of CDK4 correlated with poor survival. A combined model of both CDK6 and CDK4 expressions is a superior predictor of survival than either alone. Specific knockdown of CDK4 and/or CDK6 by siRNAs shows that they are required for proliferation of EAC cells and that their function is additive. PD-0332991 targets the kinase activity of both molecules and suppresses proliferation and anchorage independence of EAC cells through activation of the pRB pathway.Conclusions: We suggest that CDK6 is the driver of 7q21 amplification and that both CDK4 and CDK6 are prognostic markers and bona fide oncogenes in EAC. Targeting these molecules may constitute a viable new therapy for this disease. Clin Cancer Res; 17(13); 4513–22. ©2011 AACR.

Background & Aims Based on results from year 2 of a 5-year trial, in 2012 the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of a magnetic device to augment lower esophageal sphincter function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We report the final results of 5 years of follow-up evaluation of patients who received this device. Methods We performed a prospective study of the safety and efficacy of a magnetic device in 100 adults with GERD for 6 months or more, who were partially responsive to daily proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and had evidence of pathologic esophageal acid exposure, at 14 centers in the United States and The Netherlands. The magnetic device was placed using standard laparoscopic tools and techniques. Eighty-five subjects were followed up for 5 years to evaluate quality of life, reflux control, use of PPIs, and side effects. The GERD–health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire was administered at baseline to patients on and off PPIs, and after placement of the device; patients served as their own controls. A partial response to PPIs was defined as a GERD-HRQL score of 10 or less on PPIs and a score of 15 or higher off PPIs, or a 6-point or more improvement when scores on vs off PPI were compared. Results Over the follow-up period, no device erosions, migrations, or malfunctions occurred. At baseline, the median GERD-HRQL scores were 27 in patients not taking PPIs and 11 in patients on PPIs; 5 years after device placement this score decreased to 4. All patients used PPIs at baseline; this value decreased to 15.3% at 5 years. Moderate or severe regurgitation occurred in 57% of subjects at baseline, but only 1.2% at 5 years. All patients reported the ability to belch and vomit if needed. Bothersome dysphagia was present in 5% at baseline and in 6% at 5 years. Bothersome gas-bloat was present in 52% at baseline and decreased to 8.3% at 5 years. Conclusions Augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter with a magnetic device provides significant and sustained control of reflux, with minimal side effects or complications. No new safety risks emerged over a 5-year follow-up period. These findings validate the long-term safety and efficacy of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device for patients with GERD. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT00776997.

The development of and adherence to quality indicators in gastroenterology, as in all of medicine, is increasing in importance to ensure that patients receive consistent high-quality care. In addition, government-based and private insurers will be expecting documentation of the parameters by which we measure quality, which will likely affect reimbursements. Barrett’s esophagus remains a particularly important disease entity for which we should maintain up-to-date guidelines, given its commonality, potentially lethal outcomes, and controversies regarding screening and surveillance. To achieve this goal, a relatively large group of international experts was assembled and, using the modified Delphi method, evaluated the validity of multiple candidate quality indicators for the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus. Several candidate quality indicators achieved >80% agreement. These statements are intended to serve as a consensus on candidate quality indicators for those who treat patients with Barrett’s esophagus.

Introduction: Perioperative complications influence long- and short-term outcomes after esophagectomy. The absence of a standardized system for defining and recording complications and quality measures after esophageal resection has meant that there is wide variation in evaluating their impact on these outcomes. Methods: The Esophageal Complications Consensus Group comprised 21 high-volume esophageal surgeons from 14 countries, supported by all the major thoracic and upper gastrointestinal professional societies. Delphi surveys and group meetings were used to achieve a consensus on standardized methods for defining complications and quality measures that could be collected in institutional databases and national audits. Results: A standardized list of complications was created to provide a template for recording individual complications associated with esophagectomy. Where possible, these were linked to preexisting international definitions. A Delphi survey facilitated production of specific definitions for anastomotic leak, conduit necrosis, chyle leak, and recurrent nerve palsy. An additional Delphi survey documented consensus regarding critical quality parameters recommended for routine inclusion in databases. These quality parameters were documentation on mortality, comorbidities, completeness of data collection, blood transfusion, grading of complication severity, changes in level of care, discharge location, and readmission rates. Conclusions: The proposed system for defining and recording perioperative complications associated with esophagectomy provides an infrastructure to standardize international data collection and facilitate future comparative studies and quality improvement projects.

Background The current American Joint Committee on Cancer Seventh Edition (AJCC7) pathologic staging for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is derived from data assessing the outcomes of patients having undergone esophagectomy without neoadjuvant treatment and has unclear significance in patients who have received multimodality therapy. Lymph nodes with evidence of neoadjuvant treatment effect without residual cancer cells may be observed and are not traditionally considered in pathologic reports, but may have prognostic significance. Methods All patients who underwent esophagectomy after completing neoadjuvant therapy for EAC at our institution between 2006 and 2012 were reviewed. Slides of pathologic specimens were reexamined for locoregional treatment-response nodes lacking viable cancer cells but with evidence of acellular mucin pools, central fibrosis, necrosis, or calcifications suggesting prior tumor involvement. Kaplan-Meier survival functions were estimated, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare staging models. Results Ninety patients (82 men) underwent esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for EAC (mean age, 61.8 ± 8.9 years). All patients received preoperative chemotherapy, and 50 patients also underwent preoperative radiotherapy. Median Kaplan-Meier survival was 55.6 months, and 5-year survival was 35% (95% confidence interval, 19% to 62%). A total of 100 treatment-response nodes were found in 38 patients. For patients with limited nodal disease (62 ypN0-N1), the presence of treatment-response nodes was associated with significantly worse survival ( p = 0.03) compared with patients lacking such nodes. Adjusting for patient age and AJCC7 pathologic stage showed the presence of treatment-response nodes significantly increased the risk of death (hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 6.9; p = 0.04). When stage-adjusted survival was modeled, counting treatment-response nodes as positive nodes offered a better model fit than ignoring them. Conclusions Treatment-response lymph nodes detected from esophagectomy specimens in patients having undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy or combined chemoradiation for EAC provide valuable prognostic information, particularly in patients with limited nodal disease. The current practice of considering lymph nodes lacking viable cancer cells, but with evidence of tumor necrosis, as pathologically negative likely results in understaging. Future efforts at revising the staging system for EAC should consider incorporating treatment-response lymph nodes in the analysis.

The detection of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) via pH testing is the key component of the evaluation of patients considered for antireflux surgery. Two common pH testing systems exist, a multichannel, intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) catheter, and wireless (Bravo®) capsule; however, discrepancies between the two systems exist. In patients with atypical symptoms, MII-pH catheter is often used preferentially. We aimed to elucidate the magnitude of this discrepancy and to assess the diagnostic value of MII-pH and the Bravo wireless capsule in a population of patients with mixed respiratory and typical symptoms. The study population consisted of 66 patients tested with MII-pH and Bravo pH testing within 90 days between July 2009 and 2013. All patients presented with laryngo-pharyngo-respiratory (LPR) symptoms. Patient demographics, symptomatology, manometric and endoscopic findings, and pH monitoring parameters were analyzed. Patients were divided into four comparison groups: both pH tests positive, MII-pH negative/Bravo positive, MII-pH positive/Bravo negative, and both pH tests negative. Nearly half of the patients (44 %) had discordant pH test results. Of these, 90 % (26/29) had a negative MII-pH but positive Bravo study. In this group, the difference in the DeMeester score was large, a median of 29.3. These patients had a higher BMI (28.5 vs. 26.1, p = 0.0357), were more likely to complain of heartburn (50 vs. 23 %, p = 0.0110), to have a hiatal hernia, (85 vs. 53 %, p = 0.0075) and a structurally defective lower esophageal sphincter (LES, 85 vs. 58 %, p = 0.0208). In patients with LPR symptoms, we found a high prevalence of discordant esophageal pH results, most commonly a negative MII-pH catheter and positive Bravo. As these patients exhibited characteristics consistent with GERD (heartburn, defective LES, hiatal hernia), the Bravo results are likely true. A 24-h MII-pH catheter study may be inadequate to diagnose GERD in this patient population.

The development and advancement of ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring has provided a key tool with which pathologic esophageal acid exposure can be objectively measured; although not perfect, it provides the clinician with arguably the most important piece of information in the diagnosis and management of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. It is also important to emphasize that, although esophageal pH monitoring can reliably measure esophageal acid exposure, assessing the relationship of abnormal findings and the patients' symptoms is a much more complex matter and, of course, the key to successful treatment outcomes.

To determine and compare the frequency of cancer-associated genetic abnormalities in esophageal metaplasia biopsies with and without goblet cells.Barrett's esophagus is associated with increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), but the appropriate histologic definition of Barrett's esophagus is debated. Intestinal metaplasia (IM) is defined by the presence of goblet cells whereas nongoblet cell metaplasia (NGM) lacks goblet cells. Both have been implicated in EAC risk but this is controversial. Although IM is known to harbor genetic changes associated with EAC, little is known about NGM. We hypothesized that if NGM and IM infer similar EAC risk, then they would harbor similar genetic aberrations in genes associated with EAC.Ninety frozen NGM, IM, and normal tissues from 45 subjects were studied. DNA copy number abnormalities were identified using microarrays and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Targeted sequencing of all exons from 20 EAC-associated genes was performed on metaplasia biopsies using Ion AmpliSeq DNA sequencing.Frequent copy number abnormalities targeting cancer-associated genes were found in IM whereas no such changes were observed in NGM. In 1 subject, fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed loss of CDKN2A and amplification of chromosome 8 in IM but not in a nearby NGM biopsy. Targeted sequencing revealed 11 nonsynonymous mutations in 16 IM samples and 2 mutations in 19 NGM samples.This study reports the largest and most comprehensive comparison of DNA aberrations in IM and NGM genomes. Our results show that IM has a much higher frequency of cancer-associated mutations than NGM.

Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a very prevalent disorder. Medical therapy improves symptoms in some but not all patients. Antireflux surgery is an excellent option for patients with persistent symptoms such as regurgitation, as well as for those with complete symptomatic resolution on acid-suppressive therapy. However, proper patient selection is critical to achieve excellent outcomes. Study Design A panel of experts was assembled to review data and personal experience with regard to appropriate preoperative evaluation for antireflux surgery and to construct an evidence and experience-based consensus that has practical application. Results The presence of reflux symptoms alone is not sufficient to support a diagnosis of GERD before antireflux surgery. Esophageal objective testing is required to physiologically and anatomically evaluate the presence and severity of GERD in all patients being considered for surgical intervention. It is critical to document the presence of abnormal distal esophageal acid exposure, especially when antireflux surgery is considered, and reflux-related symptoms should be severe enough to outweigh the potential side effects of fundoplication. Each testing modality has a specific role in the diagnosis and workup of GERD, and no single test alone can provide the entire clinical picture. Results of testing are combined to document the presence and extent of the disease and assist in planning the operative approach. Conclusions Currently, upper endoscopy, barium esophagram, pH testing, and manometry are required for preoperative workup for antireflux surgery. Additional studies with long-term follow-up are required to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic benefit of new technologies, such as oropharyngeal pH testing, multichannel intraluminal impedance, and hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance, in the context of patient selection for antireflux surgery.

SummarySox2 regulates the self-renewal of multiple types of stem cells. Recent studies suggest it also plays oncogenic roles in the formation of squamous carcinoma in several organs, including the esophagus where Sox2 is predominantly expressed in the basal progenitor cells of the stratified epithelium. Here, we use mouse genetic models to reveal a mechanism by which Sox2 cooperates with microenvironmental signals to malignantly transform epithelial progenitor cells. Conditional overexpression of Sox2 in basal cells expands the progenitor population in both the esophagus and forestomach. Significantly, carcinoma only develops in the forestomach, where pathological progression correlates with inflammation and nuclear localization of Stat3 in progenitor cells. Importantly, co-overexpression of Sox2 and activated Stat3 (Stat3C) also transforms esophageal basal cells but not the differentiated suprabasal cells. These findings indicate that basal stem/progenitor cells are the cells of origin of squamous carcinoma and that cooperation between Sox2 and microenvironment-activated Stat3 is required for Sox2-driven tumorigenesis.

Esophageal motor function is highly coordinated between central and enteric nervous systems and the esophageal musculature, which consists of proximal skeletal and distal smooth muscle in three functional regions, the upper and lower esophageal sphincters, and the esophageal body. While upper endoscopy is useful in evaluating for structural disorders of the esophagus, barium esophagography, radionuclide transit studies, and esophageal intraluminal impedance evaluate esophageal transit and partially assess motor function. However, esophageal manometry is the test of choice for the evaluation of esophageal motor function. In recent years, high-resolution manometry (HRM) has streamlined the process of acquisition and display of esophageal pressure data, while uncovering hitherto unrecognized esophageal physiologic mechanisms and pathophysiologic patterns. New algorithms have been devised for analysis and reporting of esophageal pressure topography from HRM. The clinical value of HRM extends to the pediatric population, and complements preoperative evaluation prior to foregut surgery. Provocative maneuvers during HRM may add to the assessment of esophageal motor function. The addition of impedance to HRM provides bolus transit data, but impact on clinical management remains unclear. Emerging techniques such as 3-D HRM and impedance planimetry show promise in the assessment of esophageal sphincter function and esophageal biomechanics.

BACKGROUND Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease who have a partial response to proton-pump inhibitors often seek alternative therapy. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of a new magnetic device to augment the lower esophageal sphincter. METHODS We prospectively assessed 100 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease before and after sphincter augmentation. The study did not include a concurrent control group. The primary outcome measure was normalization of esophageal acid exposure or a 50% or greater reduction in exposure at 1 year. Secondary outcomes were 50% or greater improvement in quality of life related to gastroesophageal reflux disease and a 50% or greater reduction in the use of proton-pump inhibitors at 1 year. For each outcome, the prespecified definition of successful treatment was achievement of the outcome in at least 60% of the patients. The 3-year results of a 5-year study are reported. RESULTS The primary outcome was achieved in 64% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 54 to 73). For the secondary outcomes, a reduction of 50% or more in the use of proton-pump inhibitors occurred in 93% of patients, and there was improvement of 50% or more in quality-of-life scores in 92%, as compared with scores for patients assessed at baseline while they were not taking proton-pump inhibitors. The most frequent adverse event was dysphagia (in 68% of patients postoperatively, in 11% at 1 year, and in 4% at 3 years). Serious adverse events occurred in six patients, and in six patients the device was removed. CONCLUSIONS In this single-group evaluation of 100 patients before and after sphincter augmentation with a magnetic device, exposure to esophageal acid decreased, reflux symptoms improved, and use of proton-pump inhibitors decreased. Follow-up studies are needed to assess long-term safety. (Funded by Torax Medical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00776997.)

Background Current diagnostic techniques establishing gastroesophageal reflux disease as the underlying cause in patients with respiratory symptoms are poor. Our aim was to provide additional support to our prior studies suggesting that the association between reflux events and oxygen desaturations may be a useful discriminatory test in patients presenting with primary respiratory symptoms suspected of having gastroesophageal reflux as the etiology. Methods Thirty-seven patients with respiratory symptoms, 26 with typical symptoms, and 40 control subjects underwent simultaneous 24-h impedance–pH and pulse oximetry monitoring. Eight patients returned for post-fundoplication studies. Results The median number (interquartile range) of distal reflux events associated with oxygen desaturation was greater in patients with respiratory symptoms (17 (9–23)) than those with typical symptoms (7 (4–11, p

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can be difficult to diagnose - symptoms alone are often not enough, and thus, objective testing is often required. GERD is a manifestation of pathologic levels of reflux into the esophagus of acidic, nonacidic, and/or bilious gastric content. However, in our current evidence-based knowledge approach, we only have reasonable outcome data in regards to acid reflux, as this particular type of refluxate predictably causes symptoms and mucosal damage, which improves with medical or surgical therapy. While there are data suggesting that nonacid reflux may be responsible for ongoing symptoms despite acid suppression in some patients, outcome data about this issue are limited. Therefore, this working group believes that it is essential to confirm the presence of acid reflux in patients with 'refractory' GERD symptoms or extraesophageal symptoms thought to be caused by gastroesophageal reflux before an escalation of antireflux therapy is considered. If patients do not have pathologic acid reflux off antisecretory therapy, they are unlikely to have clinically significant nonacid or bile reflux. Patients who do not have pathologic acid gastroesophageal reflux parameters on ambulatory pH monitoring then: (i) could attempt to discontinue antisecretory medications like proton pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists (which are expensive and which carry risks - i.e. C. diff, etc.); (ii) may undergo further evaluation for other causes of their esophageal symptoms (e.g. functional heartburn or chest pain, eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroparesis, achalasia, other esophageal motor disorders); and (iii) can be referred to an ear, nose, and throat/pulmonary/allergy physician for assessment of non-GERD causes of their extraesophageal symptoms.

Objective This study aimed to identify pathways and cellular processes that are modulated by exposure of normal esophageal cells to bile and acid. Background Barrett's esophagus most likely develops as a response of esophageal stem cells to the abnormal reflux environment. Although insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms are slowly emerging, much of the metaplastic process remains unknown. Methods We performed a global analysis of gene expression in normal squamous esophageal cells in response to bile or acid exposure. Differentially expressed genes were classified into major biological functions using pathway analysis and interaction network software. Array data were verified by quantitative PCR and western blot both in vitro and in human esophageal biopsies. Results Bile modulated expression of 202 genes, and acid modulated expression of 103 genes. Genes involved in squamous differentiation formed the largest functional group (n = 45) all of which were downregulated by bile exposure. This included genes such as involucrin (IVL), keratinocyte differentiation-associated protein (KRTDAP), grainyhead-like 1 (GRHL1), and desmoglein1 (DSG1) the downregulation of which was confirmed by quantitative PCR and western blot. Bile also caused expression changes in genes involved in cell adhesion, DNA repair, oxidative stress, cell cycle, Wnt signaling, and lipid metabolism. Analysis of human esophageal biopsies demonstrated greatly reduced expression of IVL, KRTDAP, DSG1, and GRHL1 in metaplastic compared to squamous epithelia. Conclusions We report for the first time that bile inhibits the squamous differentiation program of esophageal epithelial cells. This, coordinated with induction of genes driving intestinal differentiation, may be required for the development of Barrett's esophagus.

Rudolph Nissen firstly implemented the idea of surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux more than 55 years ago. Today, laparoscopic fundoplication has become the surgical "golden standard" for the treatment of GERD. However, the initial enthusiasm and increasing number of performed procedures in the early 1990s declined dramatically between 2000 and 2006. Despite its excellent outcome, laparoscopic fundoplication is only offered to a minority of patients who are suffering from GERD. In this article we review the current indications for antireflux surgery, technical and intraoperative aspects of fundoplication, perioperative complications as well as short and long-term outcome. The focus is on the laparoscopic approach as the current surgical procedure of choice.

Purpose: Chromosomal gain at 7q21 is a frequent event in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, this event has not been mapped with fine resolution in a large EAC cohort, and its association with clinical endpoints and functional relevance are unclear. Experimental Design: We used a cohort of 116 patients to fine map the 7q21 amplification using SNP microarrays. Prognostic significance and functional role of 7q21 amplification and its gene expression were explored. Results: Amplification of the 7q21 region was observed in 35% of tumors with a focal, minimal amplicon containing six genes. 7q21 amplification was associated with poor survival and analysis of gene expression identified cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) as the only gene in the minimal amplicon whose expression was also associated with poor survival. A low-level amplification (10%) was observed at the 12q13 region containing the CDK6 homologue cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4). Both amplification and expression of CDK4 correlated with poor survival. A combined model of both CDK6 and CDK4 expressions is a superior predictor of survival than either alone. Specific knockdown of CDK4 and/or CDK6 by siRNAs shows that they are required for proliferation of EAC cells and that their function is additive. PD-0332991 targets the kinase activity of both molecules and suppresses proliferation and anchorage independence of EAC cells through activation of the pRB pathway. Conclusions: We suggest that CDK6 is the driver of 7q21 amplification and that both CDK4 and CDK6 are prognostic markers and bona fide oncogenes in EAC. Targeting these molecules may constitute a viable new therapy for this disease. Clin Cancer Res; 17(13); 4513–22. ©2011 AACR.

Pathologic esophageal tumor length (pL) is an independent predictor of long-term survival. However, whether patients with longer (high-risk) tumors can be identified by endoscopy before surgery has not been established. The objective of the current study was to determine the value of endoscopically measured tumor length (cL) in predicting overall survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.All patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who had undergone resection without neoadjuvant therapy and who had documented preoperative endoscopy findings were identified retrospectively by using prospectively collected databases at 2 institutions: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (n = 164; training set) and University of Rochester Medical Center (n = 109; validation set). Esophageal tumors were assessed preoperatively by endoscopy for cL, depth (cT), and lymph node involvement (cN). Univariate and multivariate analyses of cL and other standard prognostic factors were performed.In the training set, cL was correlated directly with pL (Pearson correlation [r] = 0.683; P.001). Regression tree analyses suggested an optimum cutoff point of cL2 cm to identify patients with decreased long-term survival (5-year survival rate: cL2 cm, 29%; cL ≤ 2 cm, 78%; P.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that cL2 cm was an independent risk factor for long-term survival (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.4; P = .02) even after controlling for age, cT, and cN. Validation with the validation dataset confirmed that cL was correlated directly with pL (r = 0.657; P.001) and predicted long-term survival using a cL cutoff point of2 cm (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-5.8; P = .004; univariate analysis).Endoscopic esophageal tumor length was identified as an independent predictor of long-term survival and may help to identify high-risk patients before they receive cancer-directed therapy.

Background and Aims: Traditionally large, complex colorectal polyps were managed by surgical resection (SR), and in recent years endoscopic resection (ER) has progressed significantly. However, to what extent ER has replaced SR remains largely unknown. We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study to assess the volume and volume changes of SR for benign colorectal polyps over the past decade. Methods: Patients who underwent SR for a benign colorectal polyp in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2015 were selected from the prospective nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA database). Clinical characteristics were obtained from the charts of patients who underwent SR in the province of Noord-Holland. Results: A total of 5937 patients were treated with SR for a colorectal polyp and the absolute (454-739 per year) and relative volumes (0.20%-0.37% per colonoscopy per year) of SR remained stable. In the province of Noord-Holland, 928 patients (15.6%) underwent SR. In these patients, submucosal lifting and ER were attempted in 19.9% (n = 175) and 15.0% (n = 134). After 2010, patients were more likely to undergo lifting (27.7% vs 11.4%, P

Studies of positron emission tomography (PET) have focused mainly on tumor staging. The role of PET in predicting survival has received less attention. We sought to assess the relationship of pretreatment maximum standard uptake value (SUV(max)) to survival in surgical patients with esophageal cancer.The study consisted of 72 esophagectomy patients (60 with adenocarcinoma) undergoing resection between July 2005 and April 2009. PET combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) was performed at a single center, and SUV(max) was recorded prior to any therapy. Survival was assessed at a median follow-up of 19 months.The median SUV(max) was 6.25. A receiver operating characteristic curve identified SUV(max) 4.5 to optimally discriminate survival. Patients with low SUV(max) (4.5) had significantly (p = 0.0003) better survival than those with high SUV(max) (or=4.5). Stage 3 patients with low SUV(max) had significantly better survival (p = 0.0069) than those with high SUV(max). Likewise, N1 disease patients with low SUV(max) had significantly better survival (p = 0.008) than those with high SUV(max). Multivariate analysis identified SUV(max) to be an independent predictor of survival (p = 0.0021).Pretreatment PET-CT SUV(max) independently predicts survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing resection. SUV(max) may be a valuable marker of tumor biology that could potentially be exploited for prognostic and therapeutic purposes.

Background Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the predominant risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. BE is characterized by intestinal metaplasia with goblet cells. Reflux of bile acids is known to induce intestinal metaplasia, but the mechanisms are unclear. Inhibition of Notch signaling accompanied by increased Hath1 and induction of caudal homeobox 2 (CDX2) may be involved in development of intestinal goblet cells. Methods Esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines OE19 and OE33 were exposed for up to 8 hours to DCA (100–300 μM), and for up to 24 hours with and without the γ-secretase inhibitor, DAPT (20μM). Notch signaling components and CDX2 levels were measured by real-time PCR (for mRNA) and by Western blot analysis (for proteins). Results DCA induced a time and concentration dependent decrease in Notch pathway components mRNAs in OE33 and in the proteins in both cell lines. CDX2 mRNA and Hath1 protein were increased in OE19 by 3-fold. Inhibition of Notch pathway by DAPT decreased downstream Notch signaling mRNAs and proteins in both cell lines and increased Hath1 and CDX2 proteins only in OE19. Conclusion Bile acid inhibition of Notch signaling in esophageal cells is correlated with an increase in Hath1 and CDX2 and may be one of the key processes contributing to the formation of BE.

Proof of the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and respiratory symptoms remains a challenge. Our aim was to determine the association between reflux events and O(2) desaturation in GERD patients with primary respiratory symptoms (RS) compared to those with primary esophageal symptoms (ES) using ambulatory monitoring systems.One thousand eight hundred fifty-one reflux episodes were detected by multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH testing in 30 patients with symptoms of GERD (20 RS, ten ES.) All patients underwent simultaneous 24-h MII-pH and continuous O(2) saturation monitoring via pulse oximetry. Reflux-associated desaturation events were determined by correlating synchronized 24-h esophageal pH and/or impedance and O(2) desaturation.One thousand one hundred seventeen reflux events occurred in patients with RS and 734 in those with ES. Nearly 60% of these 1,851 reflux events were associated with O(2) desaturation. Markedly more events were associated with O(2) desaturation in patients with RS (74.5%, 832/1,117) than in patients with ES (30.4%, 223/734, p0.0001). The difference in reflux desaturation association was more profound with proximal reflux--80.3% with RS vs. 29.4% with ES (p0.0001).A remarkably high prevalence of O(2) desaturation associated with gastroesophageal reflux was noted in patients with RS. Given further study, simultaneous combined esophageal reflux and O(2) saturation monitoring may prove a useful diagnostic tool in this difficult group of patients.

Bile acids and acid are implicated in the development of Barrett's esophagus. Evidence suggests that Barrett's esophagus intestinal metaplasia may occur via induction of caudal homeobox gene 2 (CDX2). We hypothesized that induction of CDX2 by bile acids may be due to ligand-dependent transactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).Human mucosal epithelial cells (SEG-1) were treated for 0 to 24 h with up to 300 microM deoxycholic acid (DCA) at pH 7 or 5 with or without (w/wo) antibodies against EGFR ligand-binding site (Mab528, 3-5 mug/ml). Treatment with 100 ng/ml EGF served as control. CDX2 mRNA expression was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction. EGFR activation was analyzed by Westerns of phosphorylated EGFR tyrosines.Acid (pH 5) increased the induction of CDX2 mRNA expression caused by DCA. CDX2 mRNA induction was markedly reduced by EGFR blockade with Mab528. Each treatment (pH 5, DCA or pH 5 plus DCA) activated the EGFR on all tyrosines tested but in different time courses. Phosphorylation by DCA was inhibited by Mab528. Activation of EGFR by DCA at pH 5 resulted in EGFR degradation, while that by DCA alone did not.Thus, CDX2 induction by DCA w/wo acid occurs through ligand-dependent transactivation of the EGFR. The variations in EGFR degradation pattern with DCA or DCA at pH 5 indicate differential transactivation pathways. The molecular pathogenesis of Barrett's esophagus may occur via bile-stimulated cell signaling through the EGFR.

More than 50 years have passed since Rudolf Nissen astutely noticed the effects of his gastroplication on prevention of gastroesophageal reflux. Much progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Antireflux surgery is an important component of the treatment options, applicable in 10% to 15% of patients with symptoms of GERD. Its application, however, is more complex than meets the eye. Considerable judgment in patient selection, careful preoperative evaluation, appropriate selection of the ideal procedure, and proper surgical technique are required to achieve a high degree of success. The data reviewed here show that when these factors are present, outcomes are reproducible and excellent. Recent clinical research focusing on the physiology of fundoplication, symptom control, patient satisfaction, and the postoperative quality of life have taught us much, as has the careful analysis of complications and surgical failures. We anticipate that advances in our understanding of GERD will continue to enable clinicians to treat this disease with increasing effectiveness and efficiency.

Reliable quantification of gene expression offers the possibility of more accurate and prognostically relevant characterization of tissues than potentially subjective interpretations of histopathologists. We measured the expression of 18 selected genes and compared them to histological features in a spectrum of esophageal disease to evaluate the feasibility of molecular characterization of normal and pathologic esophageal epithelia. Esophageal tissue biopsies from 82 patients with foregut symptoms were laser capture microdissected, and the expression levels of 18 selected genes were measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Linear discriminant analysis, which uses combinations of genes to distinguish between histological groups, was performed to compare gene expression and the following five histological groups: (1) normal squamous epithelium (n = 35), (2) reflux esophagitis (n = 13), (3) non-dysplastic Barrett's (n = 33), (4) dysplastic Barrett's (n = 16), (5) adenocarcinoma (n = 31). A panel of seven genes had 90-94% predictive power to distinguish non-dysplastic and dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Clustering analysis revealed structure in gene expression values even in the absence of histology. Expression levels in 17 genes differed significantly across histological groups. Classification based on gene expression agreed with histopathological assessment in the following percentage of cases: normal squamous epithelium = 53%, reflux esophagitis = 31%, non-dysplastic Barrett's = 76%, dysplastic Barrett's = 40%, and adenocarcinoma = 59%. Interestingly, predictive power improved markedly when inflammatory and dysplastic tissues were removed (77-94%). Gene expression classification agrees well with histopathological examination. When differences occur, it is unclear whether this effect is due to intraobserver variability in pathological diagnosis or to a genuine difference between gene expression and histopathology.

Introduction Clinical evidence strongly suggests that bile acids are important in the development of Barrett’s esophagus, although the mechanism remains unknown. Caudal-related homeobox 2 (CDX2) is a transcription factor recently implicated in early differentiation and maintenance of normal intestinal epithelium and is suggested to play a key role in the pathogenesis of intestinal metaplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.

Careful scrutiny of pH recordings and symptom diaries in patients having 24-hour pH-metry reveals that most reflux episodes are asymptomatic. Although this observation is well known and long recognized, the explanation for why one reflux episode leads to symptoms and others do not is incompletely understood. Forty-four patients with chronic typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms referred for ambulatory pH testing were studied. Antisecretory medication was stopped 2 weeks prior to the study. Two meals were taken during the study; one standardized (hamburger, fries, milk-shake) and one at the patient's discretion. A system onset marker noted the type, beginning and end of symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain). Age, sex, upright/supine position, nadir pH, time pH4, and relationship to meals were compared for symptomatic/asymptomatic reflux episodes. An acid reflux event was defined as a drop in pH4 lasting5 seconds. The pH catheter detected 1464 reflux episodes. Only 93 (6.3%) were symptomatic. Forty-six of the 93 (49.4%) were associated with heartburn, 38 (40.9%) with regurgitation, and nine (9.7%) with chest pain. Nadir pH was significantly lower in symptomatic episodes. Nearly 50% of symptomatic reflux episodes occurred after meals, especially after non-standardized compared to standardized meal. Symptomatic episodes tended to be longer in duration and to occur in the supine position, while age/sex made no difference. Six percent of the reflux episodes were temporally associated with typical GERD symptoms. This association seems to be influenced by the acidity of the refluxate. Nearly half of the symptomatic reflux episodes occurred after eating.

BACKGROUND: The presence of dilated intercellular spaces in the stratified squamous lining of the esophagus is the pathognomonic feature of reflux esophagitis secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In addition to stomach acid, bile salts are major constituents of gastroesophageal refluxate. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of bile salts cocktail at different pHs on epithelial junctions in an in vitro transwell model of stratified esophageal squamous epithelium. DISCUSSION: Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) immortalized primary esophageal EPC1 cells were grown on polyester transwell surfaces in calcium-enriched media. The cells exhibited gradual stratification into an 11-layered squamous epithelium over 7 days, together with epithelial barrier function as indicated by increased transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER). This stratified epithelium demonstrated well-formed tight junctions, adherens junctions, and desmosomes as visualized by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. When exposed to short pulses of bile salts at pH 5, but not either condition alone, there was loss of stratification and decrease in TEER, concomitant with disruption of adherens junctions, tight junctions, and desmosomes, leading to the appearance of dilated intercellular spaces. At the cellular level, bile salts at pH 5 activated the Wnt pathway (indicated by increased β-catenin Ser552 phosphorylation). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, in our in vitro transwell model bile salts at pH 5, but not bile salts or media at pH 5 alone, modulate Wnt signaling, disrupt different junctional complexes, and cause increased permeability of stratified squamous esophageal epithelium. These changes approximate the appearance of dilated intercellular space similar to that found in GERD patients.

Background: Currently, there is a lack of ideal biomarkers for predicting nodal status in preoperative stage of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) to aid optimising therapeutic options. We studied the potential of applying subtype macrophages to predict lymph node metastasis and prognosis in EAC. Material and Methods: Fifty-three EAC resection specimens were immunostained with CD68, CD40 (M1), and CD163 (M2). Lymphatic vessel density (LVD) was estimated with the staining of D2-40. Subsequently, we tested if M2d macrophage could promote EAC cell migration and invasion. Results: In EAC without neoadjuvant treatment, an increase in M2-like macrophage was associated with poor patient survival, independent of the locations of macrophages in tumour. The M2/M1 ratio that represented the balance between M2- and M1-like macrophages was significantly higher in nodal-positive EACs than that in nodal-negative EACs, and inversely correlated with patient overall survival. The M2/M1 ratio was not related to LVD. EAC cell polarised THP1 cell into M2d-like macrophage, which promoted EAC cell migration and invasion. Neoadjuvant therapy appeared to diminish the correlation between the M2/M1 ratio and survival. Conclusions: The ratio of M2/M1 macrophage may serve as a sensitive marker to predict lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in EAC without neoadjuvant therapy. M2d macrophage may have important roles in EAC metastasis.

Tissue homeostasis requires balanced self-renewal and differentiation of stem/progenitor cells, especially in tissues that are constantly replenished like the esophagus. Disruption of this balance is associated with pathological conditions, including eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), in which basal progenitor cells become hyperplastic upon proinflammatory stimulation. However, how basal cells respond to the inflammatory environment at the molecular level remains undetermined. We previously reported that the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway is critical for epithelial morphogenesis in the embryonic esophagus. Here, we address how this pathway regulates tissue homeostasis and EoE development in the adult esophagus. BMP signaling was specifically activated in differentiated squamous epithelium, but not in basal progenitor cells, which express the BMP antagonist follistatin. Previous reports indicate that increased BMP activity promotes Barrett’s intestinal differentiation; however, in mice, basal progenitor cell–specific expression of constitutively active BMP promoted squamous differentiation. Moreover, BMP activation increased intracellular ROS levels, initiating an NRF2-mediated oxidative response during basal progenitor cell differentiation. In both a mouse EoE model and human biopsies, reduced squamous differentiation was associated with high levels of follistatin and disrupted BMP/NRF2 pathways. We therefore propose a model in which normal squamous differentiation of basal progenitor cells is mediated by BMP-driven NRF2 activation and basal cell hyperplasia is promoted by disruption of BMP signaling in EoE.

A major limitation to screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus is the complexity, expense, and risk associated with sedation for upper endoscopy. This study examines the feasibility, accuracy, and patient acceptability of office-based unsedated endoscopy as an alternative.Of 274 eligible adults scheduled for endoscopic screening for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms or surveillance of Barrett's esophagus at a tertiary care center, 121 underwent unsedated small-caliber endoscopy and conventional endoscopy in a randomized crossover study. The two procedures were compared with regard to histological detection of Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia and biopsy size. Patients answered questionnaires assessing the tolerability of the procedures.The prevalence of Barrett's esophagus was 26% using conventional endoscopy and 30% using unsedated endoscopy (P= 0.503). The level of agreement between the two approaches was "moderate" (kappa= 0.591). Each modality detected four cases of low-grade dysplasia with concordance on one case. The tissue samples collected with unsedated endoscopy were smaller than with conventional endoscopy (P0.001). The majority of subjects rated their experience with both procedures as being well tolerated with minimal or no difficulty. When asked which procedure they would prefer in the future, 71% (81/114) chose unsedated small-caliber endoscopy.Office-based unsedated small-caliber endoscopy is technically feasible, well tolerated, and accurate in screening for Barrett's esophagus, despite yielding a smaller biopsy specimen. This approach bears the potential to eliminate the infrastructure and cost required for intravenous sedation in this application.

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is rising faster the any other cancer in the United States. Studies from around the world strongly suggest that for early cancers of the lower esophagus and cardia, en bloc esophagogastrectomy results in significantly better survival rates than does transhiatal esophagogastrectomy.

Background Surgery, as the mainstay of treatment for localized esophageal cancer, is currently being challenged by the assumed high risk of esophagectomy and the poor longterm survival after resection. Epidemiologic and clinical changes over the past decade indicate that these assumptions should be reevaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the modern outcomes of esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma. Study design We studied 263 consecutive patients (215 men, 48 women), who had esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma from 1992 to 2002. Ninety-seven (37%) were stage I, 63 (24%) were stage II, 93 (35%) were stage III, and 10 (4%) were stage IV. Forty-five percent (119 of 263) had curative en bloc resection, 52% (138 of 263) had node involvement, and 18% (48) received neoadjuvant therapy. Results Seventeen percent (44 of 263) of the patients were identified in a Barrett's surveillance program. The frequency of T1N0 adenocarcinoma increased over the study period (p=0.024). The overall 5-year survival was 46.5%, and for the last 5 years of the study was 50.4%. The overall 5-year survival for stage I was 81%; for stage II, 51%; for stage III, 14%; and for stage IV, 0%. Complications occurred in 61% and there were 12 perioperative deaths (4.5%). Cox proportional hazard analysis identified tumor stage and type of resection as independent predictors of survival. Conclusions Nearly half of patients undergoing esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma survive ≥5 years. Improvements in survival are associated with increased detection of early stage disease, and a liberal use of en bloc resection. Nonsurgical treatments should be compared with these contemporary outcomes measures.

The Bravo catheter-free pH monitoring system uses a capsule attached to the esophageal mucosa to detect acid exposure. Placement of the Bravo capsule is associated with intermittent chest pain in 50% of normal volunteers. The authors hypothesized that chest pain in this setting may be attributable to hypertensive esophageal contractions induced by the Bravo capsule. The study population consisted of 40 consecutive patients with reflux symptoms who had stationary esophageal manometry within 1 h after Bravo capsule placement. The control group consisted of 40 patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from a population of patients with foregut symptoms who were computer matched to the study group for age, sex, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, LES length, and 24-h pH composite score. The patients in the control group had manometry before Bravo capsule placement. The occurrence of chest pain was assessed before and during the monitoring period by interview and review of the patient’s diary. Mean contraction amplitudes in the distal third of the esophagus after 10 wet swallows were averaged. The prevalence of patients with esophageal contraction amplitudes in the distal third that exceeded the 95th percentile of normal (180 mmHg) and the mean amplitude of distal third esophageal contractions in the study and control populations were compared. In the study group, the incidence of chest pain among the patients with hypercontractility of the esophagus was compared with the incidence among those without hypercontractility. The mean contraction amplitude was higher in the study group (144.7 vs 105.5 mmHg; p = 0.002). The number of patients with a mean distal esophageal contraction amplitude exceeding the 95th percentile of normal also was significantly higher in the study group (13/40 vs 5/40; p = 0.03). A total of 10 patients experienced new onset of chest pain with the Bravo capsule in place, and 6 patients experienced hypertensive esophageal contractions. The intraesophageal Bravo capsule can cause hypertensive esophageal contractions, which may lead to chest pain.

The presentation and management of esophageal cancer are changing, as more patients are diagnosed at an earlier stage of the disease in which endoscopic treatment methods may be contemplated. Therefore, we conducted a study to determine whether symptomatic and endoscopic findings can accurately identify node-negative early-stage adenocarcinoma. A total of 213 consecutive patients (171 men and 42 women) with resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma seen from 1992 to 2002 were evaluated. None of these patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Using a multivariable model, model-based probabilities of early-stage disease (T1 im/sm N0) were calculated for each combination of the following three features: no dysphagia as main symptom at presentation, tumor length ≤2 cm, and noncircumferential lesion. Eighty-two percent of the patients with all three characteristics presented with early-stage disease. Even in the setting of small, visible, noncircumferential tumors/nodules in patients without dysphagia, 14% of the patients harbored node metastasis. Simple clinical and endoscopic findings predicted early-stage disease in 82% of cases, whereas a small but significant percentage had node metastasis. Because node metastasis predisposes to local failure in nonresectional treatment options such as endoscopic mucosal resection and photodynamic therapy, such findings should have a significant bearing on treatment decisions.

Enteryx implantation in the esophagus is an alternative therapy for patients with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dependent GERD. Although this treatment resulted in highly significant improvement at 6 and 12 months, longer follow-up is needed to more fully assess the durability of these positive effects.An open-label, international clinical trial was conducted in 144 PPI-dependent patients with GERD with follow-up at 6 and 12 months. In addition, the durability and the safety of the treatment were assessed for 24 months in 64 patients enrolled in a postapproval study. The primary study outcome measure was usage of PPI. Secondary outcomes in the multicenter trial were GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) symptom score and esophageal acid exposure.At 12 months, PPI use was reducedor =50% in 84%: 95% confidence interval (CI) [76%, 90%] and was eliminated in 73%: 95% CI[64%, 81%] of evaluable patients (intent-to-treat analysis 78%: 95% CI[70%, 84%] and 68%: 95% CI[60%, 76%], respectively). A GERD-HRQLor =11 was attained in 78%: 95% CI[69%, 85%] of evaluable patients. Esophageal acid exposure (total time pH4) was reduced by 31%: 95% CI[17%, 43%]. At 24 months, aor =50% or greater reduction in PPI use was achieved in 72%: 95% CI[59%, 82%] and PPI use was eliminated in 67%: 95% CI[54%, 78%] of patients.This investigation provides evidence for sustained effectiveness and safety of implantation of Enteryx in the esophagus in PPI-dependent patients with GERD.

Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms occur with similar frequency in males and females, yet Barrett's esophagus is less common in females. The reason for this disparity is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the factors related to Barrett's in females.The records of 796 patients (462 male, 334 female) evaluated from 1990 to 2000 for symptoms of reflux were retrospectively reviewed. Physiologic abnormalities based on results of endoscopic, motility, pH, and Bilitec testing were identified, and factors related to the presence of Barrett's were determined using univariate and multivariate analysis.Females with reflux symptoms were significantly less likely to have a positive 24-h pH test, a defective lower esophageal sphincter, or a hiatal hernia than males with reflux symptoms. Further, females with reflux on the basis of an abnormal 24-h pH test had significantly less esophageal acid exposure than males with reflux. In contrast, esophageal exposure to refluxed acid and bilirubin was similar in females (n = 50) and males (n = 136) with Barrett's. On multivariable analysis increased esophageal bilirubin exposure was the only significant factor associated with the presence of Barrett's in male and female patients with reflux disease.Females with reflux symptoms have less esophageal acid exposure on average than males. However, females and males with Barrett's have a similar severity of reflux, and the female gender does not protect against the development of Barrett's in the setting of advanced reflux disease. Esophageal bilirubin exposure is the major risk factor for the presence of Barrett's in patients with reflux disease.

Over the past decade, a number of endoscopic techniques have been developed as alternatives to medical and surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The driving force was to provide an outpatient transoral, endoscopic procedure effective in controlling reflux in a portion of patients with GERD. Three major technologies emerged, although each use different approaches to augment the barrier function of the lower esophageal sphincter, mechanisms may be similar. These include Endocinch which tightens the gastroesophageal junction via a set of suture plications around the lower esophageal sphincter, Stretta, which delivers radiofrequency energy at the cardia, and Enteryx, which is an inert polymer injected into the muscle layer of the gastroesophageal junction. To date, the underlying mechanism of action of these procedures has not been completely elucidated, although each alters the compliance of the GEJ and thus its ability to respond to a “refluxogenic stress”. The target population currently consists of proton pump inhibitor-dependent GERD patients, with little or no hiatal hernia and without severe esophagitis or Barrett's. The Stretta procedure is the only procedure to date to be subjected to a sham-controlled trial. Registries of complications suggest that these techniques are relatively safe, but serious morbidity including rare mortality have been reported. All can be performed on an outpatient basis. Future comparative studies with predetermined end points, validated outcome measures, prolonged follow-up, and complete complication registries are needed to determine the role of endoscopic procedures in the clinical practice of patients with GERD. Evolution of the current technologies will almost certainly occur, and a commonly performed, efficacious endoscopic antireflux procedure is likely to emerge.

Proton pump inhibitors are the mainstay of medical management in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Although they provide relief from most symptoms, reflux may persist. We hypothesize that omeprazole does not reduce the total amount of gastroesophageal reflux but simply alters its pH characteristics. Six asymptomatic volunteers had combined 24-hour impedance pH monitoring before and after 7 days of omeprazole (20 mg BID). Multichannel intraluminal impedance was used to identify reflux episodes, which were classified as acid (pH 4 but decrease > 1 pH unit) and nonacid (pH > 4 and decrease < 1 pH unit) by pH measurements 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). A gastric pH sensor located 10 cm below the LES was used to verify the action of omeprazole. Impedance detected a total of 116 reflux episodes before and 96 episodes after omeprazole treatment. The median number of reflux episodes (18 versus 16, P = 0.4), median duration of reflux episodes (4.7 versus 3.6 minutes, P = 0.5), and total duration of reflux episodes (27.2 versus 42.4 minutes, P = 0.5) per subject were similar before and after omeprazole. Acid reflux episodes were reduced from 63% before to 2.1% after omeprazole (P < 0.0001), whereas nonacid reflux episodes increased (15% to 76%, P < 0.0001). Weak acid reflux episodes did not change (22.4% to 21.8%, P = 1.0). The proportion of reflux episodes greater than pH 4 increased from 37% to 98% (P < 0.0001). In normal subjects, omeprazole treatment does not affect the number of reflux episodes or their duration; rather it converts acid reflux to less acid reflux, thus exposing esophagus to altered gastric juice. These observations may explain the persistence of symptoms and emergence of mucosal injury white on proton pump inhibitor therapy.

The number or ratio of lymph node metastases detected by hematoxylineosin (HE) staining is the most important predictor of survival in esophageal cancer. The survival effect of lymph node metastases detected on immunohistochemistry (IHC) is controversial. My colleagues and I hypothesized that the extent of nodal disease determined by both HE and IHC examination would more accurately predict survival than either technique alone.The study population consisted of 37 patients who underwent en bloc esophagectomy as primary therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma 5 or more years ago. All had mediastinal and upper abdominal lymphadenectomy. No patient received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Tissue blocks were sectioned for HE staining to confirm the initial histology, and a second slide was stained with monoclonal antibodies AE1 and CAM 5.2, which are directed at a number of cytokeratin antigens. The slides were reviewed by an investigator blinded to clinical outcome. The effect of IHC staining on prognosis was assessed by comparing 5-year survival based on HE and IHC findings.A total of 1,970 nodes were examined in the 37 patients. Routine HE staining detected metastases in 29 patients (78%); the remaining 8 with N0 disease all survived at least 5 years after operation (median not reached). In the 29 patients with N1 disease, survival was 41% at 5 years. In 20 of the 29 N1 patients, metastases were detected by HE in less than 10% of the nodes removed; 55% of the patients survived 5 years, and 39% survived 8 years. Nine of the 29 patients had metastases detected in more than 10% of the nodes removed, and all died at a median of 17 months. IHC staining was performed on the nodes from the 8 N0 patients and the 20 patients with less than 10% nodal involvement (a total of 28 patients). Additional nodal metastases, not identified on HE examination, were found in 51 nodes from 17 patients (60.7%). Of the 8 patients who were node negative on HE examination, 3 had metastases detected by IHC, and all survived 5 years or more free of disease. Of the 20 patients with less than 10% nodal metastases on HE, 14 (70%) had additional metastases detected by IHC (median, 2 nodes per patient). When combined with the results of HE staining, the node ratio remained less than 10% in 13 patients and exceeded 10% in 7. Survival in patients whose ratio remained less than 10% was significantly better than in those whose ratio exceeded 10% (actual 5-year survival, 77% vs 14%; chi2 = 4.662; p = 0.03).IHC staining techniques can identify nodal metastases missed by routine HE examination in a large number of patients. The combination of HE and IHC examination is useful in patients with less than 10% nodal involvement by HE examination in that IHC detection of micrometastases allows classification into low-risk (75% survival) and high-risk (15% survival) groups. IHC-detected micrometastases are not of prognostic importance in N0 patients or those with greater than 10% nodal metastases on HE.

The objective of this study was to assess the course over time of the Barrett's metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. The method used was a retrospective analysis of the medical records of a patient series with a median follow-up of 25 months. The study was undertaken in a university hospital foregut laboratory. The progress of seven patients was followed through the sequence of Barrett's esophagus, low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia to cancer. They all underwent subsequent esophagectomy and were found to have intramucosal adenocarcinoma. The main outcome measure was the time from the first diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia to the development of low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Low-grade dysplasia developed in a median of 24 months, high-grade dysplasia after a median of 33 months and cancer after 36 months. All patients underwent esophagectomy with reconstruction and no patient has had a recurrence at a median follow-up of 25 months (range 10-204 months). Patients on Barrett's surveillance who develop early esophageal adenocarcinoma did so within approximately 3 years after the diagnosis of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.

Background Reports of esophageal anastomotic complications often involve more gastric than colonic reconstructions and are incomplete because of fragmented followup by physicians unfamiliar with the surgical procedure. Study design Three hundred ninety-three consecutive esophagectomy patients had prevalence and risk factors determined for graft ischemia and anastomotic leak; 363 of these patients followed for more than 1 month (median 15 months) had prevalence and risk factors determined for anastomotic stricture. Results Conduit ischemia occurred in 36 (9.2%) and anastomotic leak in 43 patients (10.9%). Risk factor for ischemia was comorbid conditions requiring therapy (Odds ratio [OR]: 2.2 [95% CI 1.1–4.3]), and for leak were ischemia (OR: 5.5 [95% CI 2.5–12.1]), neoadjuvant therapy (OR: 2.2 [95% CI 1.1–4.5]), and comorbid conditions (OR: 2.1 [95% CI 1.1–3.9]). A stricture developed in 80 patients (22.0%). Risk factors were ischemia (OR: 4.4 [95% CI 2.0–9.6]), anastomotic leak (OR: 3.8 [95% CI 1.9–7.6]), and increasing preoperative weight (p = 0.022). The prevalence of ischemia was similar after gastric (10.4%) versus colonic (7.4%) reconstruction; leak and stricture were more common (14.3% versus 6.1%, p=0.013, 31.3% versus 8.7%, p Conclusions After esophagectomy 10% of patients will develop conduit ischemia or an anastomotic leak and 22% will develop anastomotic stricture. Anastomotic leak and strictures are more common and the strictures are more severe after gastric pull-up compared with colon interposition. Dilatation is a safe and effective treatment.

IN THE LATE 1990S THE Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgery (SAGES) formed a committee (Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery or FLS) and charged it to develop educational materials covering the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Four major principles guided the committee’s developmental process. First, comprehensive coverage of the domain of basic laparoscopy was seen as involving two components: one cognitive (declarative knowledge); and the other psychomotor (procedural skill). Second, the focus of the program was to be on the educational material considered unique to laparoscopy and not on material normally encountered during open surgical training. Third, in accordance with the idea of basic fundamentals, any content specific to a particular anatomic location or to a specific laparoscopic procedure was to be avoided. And fourth, the program was to contain mechanisms for assessment as well as for didactic instruction. The overall goal of the FLS program was to ‘‘teach a standard set of cognitive and psychomotor skills to practitioners of laparoscopic surgery’’ in the belief that knowledge and application of these fundamentals would help ‘‘ensure a minimal standard of care for all patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.’’ The didactic learning modules are

Hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) is an uncommon manometric abnormality found in patients with dysphagia and chest pain, and is sometimes associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Preventing reflux by performing a fundoplication raises concerns about inducing or increasing dysphagia. The role of myotomy in isolated hypertensive LES is also unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of surgical therapy for isolated hypertensive LES and for hypertensive LES associated with GERD. Sixteen patients (5 males and 11 females), ranging in age from 39 to 89 years, with hypertensive LES (>26 mm Hg; i.e., >95th percentile of our control population) who had surgical therapy between 1996 and 1999 were reviewed. Patients with a diagnosis of achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm were excluded. All patients had dysphagia or chest pain. Eight of 16 patients had symptoms of GERD, four had a type III hiatal hernia, and four had isolated hypertensive LES pain. Patients with hypertensive LES and GERD or type III hiatal hernia had a Nissen fundoplication, and those with isolated hypertensive LES had a myotomy of the LES with partial fundoplication. Outcome was assessed as follows: excellent if the patient was asymptomatic; good if symptoms were present but no treatment was required; fair if symptoms were present and required treatment; and poor if symptoms were unimproved or worsened. All patients were contacted by telephone for symptom assessment at a median of 3.6 years (range 3 to 6.1 years) after surgery. Patients with hypertensive LES and GERD or type III hiatal hernia had significantly lower LES pressure than those with isolated hypertensive LES (29.9 vs. 47.4 mm Hg; P = 0.013). Dysphagia and chest pain were relieved in all patients at long-term follow up. Outcome was excellent in 10 of 16, good in 3 of 16, and fair in 3 of 16. All patients but one were satisfied with their outcome. Patients with hypertensive LES are a heterogeneous group in regard to symptoms and etiology. Treatment of patients with hypertensive LES should be individualized. A Nissen fundoplication for hypertensive LES with GERD or type III hiatal hernia relieves dysphagia and chest pain suggesting reflux as an etiology. A myotomy with partial fundoplication for isolated hypertensive LES relieves dysphagia and chest pain suggesting a primary sphincter dysfunction.

Background: The detection of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) has to date been limited to acid exposure observed on 24-h pH monitoring. It is clear, however that nonacid reflux can be a significant clinical problem. Recently, as impedance technology with the capacity to detect all types of reflux (acid, nonacid, liquid, mixed, and air) has been developed. Methods: Seventeen asymptomatic healthy volunteers underwent combined 24-h pH and impedance testing. In all patients, pH was measured at 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), and simultaneous impedance changes were recorded at 3, 5, 7, 9, 15, and 17 cm above the LES. Refluxes were classified as acid (drop in pH 5 sec), Nonacid, short acid, or nonacid delta based on chemical properties; they were further classified as liquid, mixed, or gas based on the physical refluxate detected by impedance changes. The height of the reflux entering the esophagus was classified as distal (

Background: Endoscopic lower esophageal sphincter (LES) implantation of a biocompatible polymer is undergoing clinical trial as an alternative to pharmacologic and laparoscopic treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The safety and efficacy of LES augmentation depend on accurate placement of the implant into the wall of the esophagus. To date, no study has demonstrated the prevalence and location of the intended implant. Methods: The study group consisted of nine patients with underlying esophageal disease severe enough to warrant esophagectomy. Three or four implants of 1 or 2 cc of Enteryx (a biocompatible ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide with micronized tantalum as a radiopaque marker) were placed at the squamocolumnar junction of each patient via a 4-mm, 23-gauge needle under endoscopic guidance. Fluoroscopy was utilized in all patients to facilitate endoscopic placement. Outcome measures included the prevalence and location of successful implantation into the wall of the esophagus. Results: Thirty of 34 implants (88%) were successfully placed into the wall of the esophagus. The remaining 4 were found lying subserosally or attached to the exterior of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Fluoroscopically, the implants often tended to coalesce, forming arcs or a ring around the GEJ. Histologic examination revealed implantation into the deep submucosa contiguous with the circular muscle and within the muscularis propria in all patients, with implants occasionally extending into the subserosa. There were no untoward reactions identified. Conclusions: Endoscopically directed implantation of a biocompatible polymer into the esophageal wall can be accomplished with a high degree of accuracy. Injection via a 4-mm needle results in the placement of material along and within the muscular layers of the esophagus.

This prospective, multicenter, single-arm study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the endoscopic implantation of Enteryx, a biocompatible, non-biodegradable liquid polymer for the treatment of GERD.Eighty-five patients with heartburn symptoms responsive to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use were enrolled. Inclusion requirements were HRQL scoreor = 11 on PPI andor = 20 off PPI, and 24-hour PH probe withor = 5% total time at PHor = 4. Patients with a hiatus hernia3 cm, grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, or esophageal motility disorder were excluded. Using a 4-mm needle tipped catheter during standard endoscopy, implants were made in 3-4 quadrants deep into the wall of the cardia. Use of PPI medications, pH-metry, manometry, GERD symptoms, and patient quality of life were assessed over a 6-month follow-up period.At 6 months, PPI use was eliminated in 74% and reduced by50% in 10% of patients. The median HRQL score improved from 24.0 pre-implant (baseline off PPIs) to 4.0 at 6 months (p0.001). Mean total esophageal acid exposure time was 9.5% pretherapy and 6.7% at 6 months (p0.001). Mean LES length increased from 2.0 cm at baseline to 3.0 cm posttherapy (p = 0.003). There were no clinically serious adverse events. Transient mild-to-moderate chest pain commonly occurred after implantation.The endoscopic implantation of Enteryx is a safe and effective therapy for eliminating or decreasing the need for PPI medications, improving GERD symptoms and patient quality of life, and decreasing esophageal acid exposure among patients suffering from GERD.