Search

The standard method for cardiac allograft preservation for the past 50 years has been static storage using crushed ice. A heart transplant transportation system designed to improve preservation quality with temperature monitoring, the Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (SCTS), was evaluated for its impact on postoperative costs relative to conventional ice storage. Observational US multicenter registry data collected during the August 2015 to November 2021 timeframe from 12 transplant hospitals were analyzed using logistic regression analysis and propensity matching to balance measured baseline covariates and to reduce selection bias. Hospital cost and outcome data post-transplant were then evaluated using various statistical methods. One hundred seventy-four (174) patients were identified resulting in 87 matches. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The SCTS group had a significantly lower proportion of ICU days on post-transplant mechanical circulatory support (p0.0001); significantly fewer patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (p = 0.017); and significantly fewer patients experiencing severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) (p = 0.03). Overall hospital plus mechanical circulatory support post-transplant costs were significantly lower by $26.7K in the CTS cohort (p = 0.03). Use of the SCTS is associated with improved clinical outcomes resulting in significantly lower overall hospital care costs.

Objective The goal of this study was to explore whether features of recorded and transcribed audio communication data extracted by machine learning algorithms can be used to train a classifier for anxiety. Materials and Methods We used a secondary data set generated by a clinical trial examining problem-solving therapy for hospice caregivers consisting of 140 transcripts of multiple, sequential conversations between an interviewer and a family caregiver along with standardized assessments of anxiety prior to each session; 98 of these transcripts (70%) served as the training set, holding the remaining 30% of the data for evaluation. Results A classifier for anxiety was developed relying on language-based features. An 86% precision, 78% recall, 81% accuracy, and 84% specificity were achieved with the use of the trained classifiers. High anxiety inflections were found among recently bereaved caregivers and were usually connected to issues related to transitioning out of the caregiving role. This analysis highlighted the impact of lowering anxiety by increasing reciprocity between interviewers and caregivers. Conclusion Verbal communication can provide a platform for machine learning tools to highlight and predict behavioral health indicators and trends.

BACKGROUND: Speech and language cues are considered significant data sources that can reveal insights into one’s behavior and well-being. The goal of this study is to evaluate how different machine learning (ML) classifiers trained both on the spoken word and acoustic features during live conversations between family caregivers and a therapist, correlate to anxiety and quality of life (QoL) as assessed by validated instruments. METHODS: The dataset comprised of 124 audio-recorded and professionally transcribed discussions between family caregivers of hospice patients and a therapist, of challenges they faced in their caregiving role, and standardized assessments of self-reported QoL and anxiety. We custom-built and trained an Automated Speech Recognition (ASR) system on older adult voices and created a logistic regression-based classifier that incorporated audio-based features. The classification process automated the QoL scoring and display of the score in real time, replacing hand-coding for self-reported assessments with a machine learning identified classifier. FINDINGS: Of the 124 audio files and their transcripts, 87 of these transcripts (70%) were selected to serve as the training set, holding the remaining 30% of the data for evaluation. For anxiety, the results of adding the dimension of sound and an automated speech-to-text transcription outperformed the prior classifier trained only on human-rendered transcriptions. Specifically, precision improved from 86% to 92%, accuracy from 81% to 89%, and recall from 78% to 88%. INTERPRETATION: Classifiers can be developed through ML techniques which can indicate improvements in QoL measures with a reasonable degree of accuracy. Examining the content, sound of the voice and context of the conversation provides insights into additional factors affecting anxiety and QoL that could be addressed in tailored therapy and the design of conversational agents serving as therapy chatbots.

Background The purpose is to perform a cost effectiveness analysis amniotic membrane vs. topical medications in the use of treating dry eye disease. A cost effectiveness analysis comparing amniotic membrane + other topical medications to topical cyclosporine A + other topical medications was evaluated using accepted decision tree modeling software. Methods TreeAge Pro 2019 software was used to evaluate the base case costs over a one year timeframe. Sensitivity analysis was performed on those variables which had the greatest effect on choosing one therapy versus the other based on cost. Monte Carlo simulation was run 1,000 times to determine the most effective, least costly alternative. Costs were evaluated from a societal level (direct + indirect). Quality of life utility scores were evaluated using known time tradeoffs from prior studies (scale 0–1; with 1 being perfect vision). Results Over a one year timeframe, the base case demonstrated that amniotic membrane + topical medications was the less expensive alternative and provided for incremental utilities versus topical cyclosporine + other medications (Cost/utility: $18,275/0.78 vs. $20,740/0.74). If examining direct costs only, topical cyclosporine was the least expensive option over a one year timeframe: $4,112 vs. $10,300. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that in order for topical cyclosporine to be the less expensive alternative the following variables would need to be: 79% of amniotic membrane implants would need to be re-implanted at month 4 (for whatever reason); > $2677 per amniotic membrane implant procedure (Medicare reimbursement rate); > 96% positive response to topical cyclosporine A at month 4; > 58% positive response to topical cyclosporine A at month 6 and; Conclusion Based on improved outcomes using amniotic membrane, patient productivity was improved resulting in lower societal costs (less days lost from work). When considering the untoward effects of dry eye disease on societal costs, an improvement of the dry eye disease condition was accomplished most often with amniotic membrane.

Background: The extent of resection (EOR) of high-grade gliomas (WHO grade III or IV) in or near areas of eloquence is associated with overall patient survival, but with higher major neurocognitive complications. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken of the peer-reviewed literature in order to identify studies which examined EOR or extent of ablation (EOA) and major complications (defined as neurocognitive or functional complications which last >3 months duration after surgery) associated with either brain laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) or open craniotomy in high-grade tumors in or near areas of eloquence. Results: Eight studies on brain LITT (n = 79 patients) and 12 craniotomy studies (n = 1,036 patients) were identified which examined either/both EOR/EOA and complications. Meta-analysis demonstrated an EOA/EOR of 85.4 ± 10.6% with brain LITT versus 77.0 ± 40% with craniotomy (mean difference: 8%; 95% CI: 2-15; p = 0.01; inverse variance, random effects model). Meta-analysis of proportions of major complications for each individual therapy demonstrated major complications of 5.7% (95% CI: 1.8-11.6) and 13.8% (95% CI: 10.3-17.9) for LITT and craniotomy, respectively. Conclusion: In patients presenting with high-grade gliomas in or near areas of eloquence, early results demonstrate that brain LITT may be a viable surgical alternative.

The 4Kscore® Test (BioReference Laboratories, Elmwood Park, NJ) is a blood test that accurately determines the risk of aggressive prostate cancer and significantly reduces prostate biopsies and associated overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent cancer. A budget impact model was developed to test the hypothesis that the 4Kscore Test can improve quality of care and deliver cost savings for patients who are suspected of having prostate cancer and would otherwise undergo prostate biopsy under the current standard of care (SOC) in the United States. The direct costs (diagnosis plus treatment) utilized in the model are based on Medicare payment data and were calculated over a 1-year time horizon. The model compares SOC, in which all patients have prostate biopsy, to a “4Kscore strategy,” in which the 4Kscore Test is used to guide the decision to biopsy the prostate. A set of one-way sensitivity analyses was conducted to examine the robustness of the findings. Savings of more than $169 million (15.6% of total SOC costs) were realized in the 4Kscore strategy versus SOC ($917 M versus $1,086 M, respectively) in a cohort of 100,000 patients. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the findings are robust. Most cost savings for the 4Kscore strategy were realized in patients who, when managed by SOC, are found to have no prostate cancer or Gleason score 6 pathology. The patients with Gleason score 6 exhibited the greatest benefits from the 4Kscore strategy, avoiding both an unnecessary prostate biopsy and subsequent overtreatment. The 4Kscore Test was shown to significantly reduce costs to the healthcare system while improving patients’ quality of care. Providers and their patients suspected of having prostate cancer should consider using the 4Kscore Test prior to proceeding with prostate biopsy.

BACKGROUND Current diagnostic testing for prostate cancer results in numerous unnecessary biopsy procedures and creates a substantial financial burden. A statistical prediction model for prostate cancer has been developed, based on four Kallikrein markers in blood. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the aggregated results from published studies of the Kallikrein Panel. METHODS Literature searches to identify relevant studies were conducted. A meta-analysis of the results was performed using inverse variance, mean difference with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). The results of the meta-analysis were used to assess the Kallikrein Panel's effect on healthcare costs. RESULTS The Kallikrein Panel has been evaluated in more than 8,500 patients (2,780 with prostate cancer and 598 with high grade prostate cancer). Meta-analysis demonstrates a statistically significant improvement of 8–10% in predictive accuracy. In addition, 48% to 56% of current prostate biopsies could be avoided. Use of the Kallikrein Panel could result in annual US savings approaching $1 billion. CONCLUSIONS The Kallikrein Panel has the potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs. The panel provides significantly improved specificity. Because the Kallikrein Panel has been studied in a range of clinical settings, it is a test that could be readily and widely used in practice. Prostate 74:250–259, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background The objective of this analysis was to determine the value (incremental cost/increment benefit) of a brain LITT system versus employing current surgical options recommended by NCCN guidelines, specifically open resection (i.e. craniotomy) methods or biopsy (collectively termed CURRENT TREATMENTS) in patients where maximal safe resection may not be feasible. As has been demonstrated in the literature, extent of resection/ablation with minimal complications are independently related to overall survival. Methods A cost effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective was employed using TreeAge Pro 2014 software. Direct costs (using national average Medicare reimbursement amounts), outcomes (overall survival), and value [defined as increment cost/incremental survival—evaluated as cost/life year gained (LYG)] were evaluated. Sensitivity analysis was also performed to determine which variables had the largest effect on incremental costs and outcomes. Results In the base case, the overall survival was improved with brain LITT versus CURRENT TREATMENTS by 3.07 months at an additional cost of $7508 (or $29,340/LYG). This amount was significantly less than the current international threshold value for $32,575/LYG and considerably less than the US threshold value of $50,000/LYG. This incremental cost may also qualify under NICE criteria for end of life therapies. In sensitivity analysis: As percent local recurrence GBM increased; cost of DRG25/26 increased; percent GTR increased; and gliadel use increased—the value of brain LITT improved. Additionally, in those patients where a biopsy is the only option, brain LITT extended life by 7 months. Conclusions Brain LITT should be considered a viable option for treatment of high grade gliomas as it improves survival at a cost which appears to be of good value to society. This incremental cost is less than the international and US thresholds for good value.

Background and objectives:The use of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance has been reported on in the literature in close to 16,000 patients with various forms of malignant and benign neoplasms. This includes studies with over 7600 patients with malignant head and neck cancer; over 250 with malignant (and refractory to other therapies) head and neck cancer; over 6600 with liver cancer; and over 1100 with benign neoplasms. As well, LITT under MRI guidance has been studied in malignant (and refractory to other therapies) lung and breast cancers with close to 300 cases reported on in the literature. To date, the sum total experience of LITT with or without MRI guidance in treating brain neoplasms has not been reported on. It is the intention of this review to do so.Methods:A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify all studies where one or more patients were treated with LITT with or without MRI guidance (LITT±MRI) for brain neoplasms. The following sources were searched (from 1990 to present): PubMed, Cochrane Review of RCTs, Technology Assessment websites (NICE, CTAF, CADTH, BCBS TEC), clinical guidelines for treating malignant brain neoplasms (NCCN, AANS), relevant clinical journals where the use of LITT would be reported on; and the websites of companies involved in the manufacture and market of these types of products.Results:Twenty-three articles (22 peer-reviewed and one abstract) were identified. After duplicate studies (n=6) were removed, 17 studies with 169 patients were identified who received LITT±MRI (mean age, 54±13.3 years; ratio male/female, 66%/34%). Most patients were reported on in the literature as case series. One study however, examined use of LITT + brachytherapy in a randomized fashion. These 169 patients were further broken out by type of tumor(s) and outcomes evaluated. Ninety-nine patients were treated for glioblastoma, recurrent malignant gliomas and, recurrent glioblastomas using LITT as a follow-on/salvage therapy (average age, 58.9 years). LITT used as the sole or as adjunctive therapy appeared to prolong survival (when evaluated against historical cohorts of patients with similar baseline characteristics) versus best/palliative care in this group. This was especially true where LITT was used in brain malignancies refractory to other therapies. Twenty-four patients (average age, 40.9 years) were treated for astrocytomas (WHO I–III) and LITT was used mainly withConclusions:The largest cohort of patients with recurrent glioblastoma/malignant glioma demonstrated longer survival times with stable to improved KI after LITT. These results compare favorably to second craniotomy procedures for malignant gliomas. Secondly, LITT appears to provide reasonable outcomes in patients where a second craniotomy may not be indicated (deep/inaccessible tumors or tumors in/near areas of eloquence). More published studies are required, most especially in patients with metastatic disease and in less aggressive type cancers based on the small numbers of patients studied in these groups.

The cost of primary total hip replacement products approaches 65% of the total reimbursement. Durability of total hip replacement resides with the acetabular component. This systematic review and meta-analysis determined if the outcomes of durability, function, and adverse events associated with cemented all-polyethylene acetabular components was similar to other acetabular designs, holding other variables constant. Randomized controlled trials only were evaluated. Two independent reviewers collected the data from 6 randomized controlled trials. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed. There was no statistical difference in regard to the outcomes at various time points (≤3, 4-8, and ≥10 years) in the 907 implants evaluated. There does, however, appear to be a trend toward abject failure with cemented all-polyethylene acetabular component implants consistent with findings of increased radiolucencies more than 10 years out. The issue of increased radiolucencies over time and failure with these types of implants bears closer scrutiny.