1. A Prospective Multi-Institutional Phase I/II Trial of Step-Wise Dose-per-Fraction Escalation in Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
- Author
-
Daniel G. Petereit, Colleen A. Lawton, Patrick A. Kupelian, Nick Anger, Heather M. Geye, Jeffrey D. Forman, Rick Chappell, and Mark A. Ritter
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Urology ,Urogenital System ,Article ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Androgen deprivation therapy ,03 medical and health sciences ,Prostate cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Cumulative incidence ,Prospective Studies ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Genitourinary system ,business.industry ,Cancer ,Prostatic Neoplasms ,Androgen Antagonists ,Middle Aged ,Prostate-Specific Antigen ,medicine.disease ,Log-rank test ,Radiation therapy ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Toxicity ,Radiation Dose Hypofractionation ,business - Abstract
Purpose This phase I/II, multi-institutional trial explored the tolerance and efficacy of stepwise increasing hypofractionation (HPFX) radiation therapy regimens for fraction sizes up to 4.3 Gy in localized prostate cancer. Methods and Materials Three escalating dose-per-fraction schedules were designed to yield similar predicted tumor control while maintaining equivalent predicted late toxicity. HPFX levels I, II, and III were carried out sequentially and delivered schedules of 64.7 Gy/22 fx/2.94 Gy, 58.08 Gy/16 fx/3.63 Gy, and 51.6 Gy/12 fx/4.3 Gy, respectively with next level escalations contingent upon acceptable gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. The primary endpoints were biochemical control and toxicity. Results A total of 347 patients were recruited by 5 institutions with 101, 111, and 135 patients treated on HPFX levels I, II, and III with median follow-ups of 100, 85.5, and 61.7 months, respectively (83.2 months combined). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network low- or intermediate-risk group distribution was 46% and 54%, respectively. Sixteen percent of patients, primarily intermediate risk, received 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. The 8-year nadir + 2 actuarial biochemical control rates for HPFX levels I, II, and III were 91.1% ± 3.0%, 92.7% ± 2.7%, and 88.5% ± 4.6%, respectively (Kaplan-Meier log rank, 0.903). Among clinical covariates, only Gleason score reached near significance in multivariate analysis (P = .054). Twenty-six patients failed biochemically (crude incidence of 7.5%), and there were 5 cause-specific deaths. GI and genitourinary toxicities were acceptable and similar across the 3 HPFX levels. The combined actuarial cumulative incidence of grade 2+ GI and genitourinary toxicities at 7 years were 16.3% ± 2.1% and 22.1% ± 2.4%, respectively. Conclusions HPFX employing fraction sizes extending into the 3.6 to 4.3 Gy/fraction range can be delivered with excellent oncologic outcomes. Such schedules, positioned between moderate and ultra-HPFX, may provide additional options for patients wishing to avoid prolonged treatment schedules associated with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
- Published
- 2020