Frances V. Fuller-Pace, Samer Abdallah, Pierre Roux, Christelle Anguille, Marie P. Khoury, Alexandra Diot, Nikola Arsic, Valerie Meuray, Colin A. Purdie, Philip R. Quinlan, Judit Remenyi, St�phanie Vinot, Marion de Toledo, S�bastien M. Joruiz, Ma�lys Cren, Gilles Gadea, Lee B. Jordan, Kenneth Fernandes, Alastair M. Thompson, Jean-Christophe Bourdon, Centre de recherches de biochimie macromoléculaire ( CRBM ), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier ( IGMM ), Université de Montpellier ( UM ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Centre for Oncology and Molecular Medicine, University of Dundee-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ), Centre of Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Centre for Digital Music, Queen Mary University of London ( QMUL ), Université Montpellier 1 ( UM1 ) -Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques ( UM2 ) -IFR122-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Institut de médecine moléculaire de Rangueil ( I2MR ), Université Paul Sabatier - Toulouse 3 ( UPS ) -IFR31-IFR150-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ), Department of Surgery and Molecular Oncology, University of Dundee, Department of Pathology [Dundee], Ninewells Hospital and Medical School [Dundee], Dundee Cancer Center, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Cellules souches normales et cancéreuses, Université Montpellier 1 ( UM1 ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Université de Montpellier ( UM ), Department of Breast Surgical Oncology [Houston], The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center [Houston], Laboratoire d'Intégration des Systèmes et des Technologies ( LIST ), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives ( CEA ) -Université Paris-Saclay, Centre de recherche en Biologie Cellulaire (CRBM), Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Université Montpellier 1 (UM1), Institut de Génétique Moléculaire de Montpellier (IGMM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM), University of Dundee-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut de médecine moléculaire de Rangueil (I2MR), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-IFR150-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Laboratoire d'Intégration des Systèmes et des Technologies (LIST), Direction de Recherche Technologique (CEA) (DRT (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Centre de recherche en Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier (CRBM), Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)- Institut Fédératif de Recherche Bio-médicale Institution (IFR150)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Laboratoire d'Intégration des Systèmes et des Technologies (LIST (CEA)), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées- Institut Fédératif de Recherche Bio-médicale Institution (IFR150)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), and Univ, Réunion
TP53 is conventionally thought to prevent cancer formation and progression to metastasis, while mutant TP53 has transforming activities. However, in the clinic, TP53 mutation status does not accurately predict cancer progression. Here we report, based on clinical analysis corroborated with experimental data, that the p53 isoform Δ133p53β promotes cancer cell invasion, regardless of TP53 mutation status. Δ133p53β increases risk of cancer recurrence and death in breast cancer patients. Furthermore Δ133p53β is critical to define invasiveness in a panel of breast and colon cell lines, expressing WT or mutant TP53. Endogenous mutant Δ133p53β depletion prevents invasiveness without affecting mutant full-length p53 protein expression. Mechanistically WT and mutant Δ133p53β induces EMT. Our findings provide explanations to 2 long-lasting and important clinical conundrums: how WT TP53 can promote cancer cell invasion and reciprocally why mutant TP53 gene does not systematically induce cancer progression. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14734.001, eLife digest Most cancers are caused by a build-up of mutations that are acquired throughout life. One gene in particular, called TP53, is the most commonly mutated gene in many types of human cancers. This suggests that TP53 mutations play an important role in cancer development. It is widely considered that the TP53 gene normally stops tumors from forming, while mutant forms of the gene somehow promote cancer growth. Evidence from patients with cancer has shown, however, that the relationship between TP53 mutations and cancer is not that simple. Some very aggressive cancers that resist treatment and spread have a normal TP53 gene. Some cancers with a mutated gene do not spread and respond well to cancer treatments. Recent studies have shown that the normal TP53 gene produces many different versions of its protein, and that some of these naturally occurring forms are found more often in tumors that others. However, it was not clear if certain versions of TP53’s proteins contributed to the development of cancer. Now, Gadea, Arsic, Fernandes et al. show that Δ133p53β, one version of the protein produced by the TP53 gene in human cells, helps tumor cells to spread to other organs. Tests of 273 tumors taken from patients with breast cancer revealed that tumors with the Δ133p53β protein were more likely to spread. Patients with these Δ133p53β-containing tumors were also more likely to develop secondary tumors at other sites in the body and to die within five years. Next, a series of experiments showed that removing Δ133p53β from breast cancer cells grown in the laboratory made them less likely to invade, while adding it back had the opposite effect. The same thing happened in colon cancer cells grown in the laboratory. The experiments showed that Δ133p53β causes tumor cells with the normal TP53 gene or a mutated TP53 gene to spread to other organs. Together the new findings help explain why some aggressive cancers develop even with a normal version of the tumor-suppressing TP53 gene. They also help explain why not all cancers with a mutant version of the TP53 gene go on to spread. Future studies will be needed to determine whether drugs that prevent the production of the Δ133p53β protein can help to treat aggressive cancers. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14734.002