Search

LARC is managed by multimodal treatments whose intensity can be highly modulated. In this context, we need surrogate endpoints to help predict long-term outcomes and better personalize treatments. A previous study identified 2yDFS as a stronger predictor of OS than pCR in LARC patients undergoing neoadjuvant RT. The aim of this pooled analysis was to assess the role of pCR and 2yDFS as surrogate endpoints for OS in a larger cohort. The pooled and subgroup analyses were performed on large rectal cancer randomized trial cohorts who received long-course RT. Our analysis focused on the evaluation of OS in relation to the pCR and 2-year disease status. A total of 4600 patients were analyzed. Four groups were identified according to intermediate outcomes: 12% had both pCR and 2yDFS (the better); 67% achieved 2yDFS but not pCR (the good); 1% had pCR but not 2yDFS; and 20% had neither pCR nor 2yDFS (the bad). The pCR and 2yDFS were favorably associated with OS in the univariate analysis, and 2yDFS maintained a statistically significant association in the multivariate analysis independently of the pCR status. The combination of the pCR and 2yDFS results in a strong predictor of OS, whereas failure to achieve 2yDFS carries a poor prognosis regardless of the pCR status. This new stratification of LARC patients could help design predictive models where the combination of 2yDFS and pCR should be employed as the primary outcome.

Purpose:No biomarker to personalize treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is currently available. We assessed in LARC whether a diagnostic biopsy-adapted immunoscore (ISB) could predict response to neoadjuvant treatment (nT) and better define patients eligible to an organ preservation strategy (“Watch-and-Wait”).Experimental Design:Biopsies from two independent cohorts (n1 = 131, n2 = 118) of patients with LARC treated with nT followed by radical surgery were immunostained for CD3+ and CD8+ T cells and quantified by digital pathology to determine ISB. The expression of immune-related genes post-nT was investigated (n = 64 patients). Results were correlated with response to nT and disease-free survival (DFS). The ISB prognostic performance was further assessed in a multicentric cohort (n = 73 patients) treated by Watch-and-Wait.Results:ISB positively correlated with the degree of histologic response (P < 0.001) and gene expression levels for Th1 orientation and cytotoxic immune response, post-nT (P = 0.006). ISB high identified patients at lower risk of relapse or death compared with ISB low [HR, 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.06–0.78; P = 0.009]. Prognostic performance of ISB for DFS was confirmed in a validation cohort. ISB was an independent parameter, more informative than pre- (P < 0.001) and post-nT (P < 0.05) imaging to predict DFS. ISB combined with imaging post-nT discriminated very good responders that could benefit from organ preservation strategy. In the “Watch-and-Wait” cohort (n = 73), no relapse was observed in patients with ISB high (23.3%).Conclusions:ISB predicts response to nT and survival in patients with LARC treated by surgery. Its usefulness in the selection of patients eligible for a Watch-and-Wait strategy is strongly suggested.

Supplementary Figures

Supplementary Tables

Background Little is known about the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and its recurrence at a population level. The aim of this study was to draw a picture of management, recurrence and survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Material and methods The 5-year probability of recurrences was estimated using the cumulative incidence function to consider competing risks of death. Net survival was estimated and a multivariate survival analysis was performed. The study was conducted using data of the Burgundy Digestive Cancer Registry. Overall, 273 squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal registered between 1998 and 2014 were considered. Results Overall, 80% of patients were treated with curative intent. Of these, 61% received chemoradiotherapy, 35% received radiotherapy and 4% received abdominoperineal resection alone. After these treatments, for cure the 5-year cumulative recurrence rate was 27% overall; it was 20% after chemoradiotherapy and 38% after radiotherapy. Five-year net survival was 71% overall; it was 81% after chemoradiotherapy and 55% after radiotherapy. Conclusions and relevance Chemoradiotherapy was highly effective in routine practice. We confirm that it is difficult to distinguish between persistent active disease and local inflammation due to radiotherapy. Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal recurrences remains a substantial problem, highlighting the interest of prolonged surveillance. Aggressive management of recurrences may be beneficial.

Introduction Early rectal cancers are increasingly diagnosed through screening programmes and are often treated using local excision (LE). In the case of adverse pathological features completion total mesorectal excision surgery (TME) is the standard recommendation. The morbidity and mortality risks of TME have stimulated the use of adjunctive treatments following LE to achieve organ preservation. Material and methods Patients treated with adjuvant CXB following local excision between 2004 and 2017 in three centres were identified (Clatterbridge, Hull, Nice). All patients had adverse pathological features including: lymphovacular invasion, Sm2-3 Kikuchi level, tumour budding, pT2, positive resection margins (R1). CXB was performed with the Papillon50 tm machine to a dose of 40–60 Gy in 2 or 3 fractions over 2–4 weeks preceding/following external beam chemo/radiotherapy. Kaplan Meier survival estimates were used for outcomes measures. Results 194 patients were identified. Median age was 70 years. pT staging was: pT1:143, pT2:45, pT3:6. CXB alone was given in 24 pts and combined with EBRT in 170. Median follow-up time was 77 months (range 7–122 months). Local relapse rate was 8% and distant metastases 9%. Organ preservation was achieved in 95%. 6 year local recurrence free and overall survival was 91% and 81% respectively. Cancer specific survival was 97%. No treatment related mortality was seen. Conclusion This large multi-centre cohort study using adjuvant CXB following local excision suggests excellent oncological outcomes for these patients without completion TME. This treatment approach can be considered as an alternative for selective patients compliant with long term follow up.

Summary Background Watch and wait is a novel management strategy in patients with rectal cancer who have a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Surveillance of these patients is generally intensive, because local regrowth (with the potential for salvage) occurs in 25% of patients, and distant metastases occur in 10% of patients. It is unclear for how long these patients should be followed up. To address this issue, we did conditional survival modelling using the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD), which is a large-scale registry of patients with a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy who have been managed by a watch-and-wait strategy. Methods We did a retrospective, multicentre registry study using a dataset from the IWWD, which includes data from 47 clinics across 15 countries. We selected patients (aged ≥18 years) with rectal cancer who had a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and who were subsequently managed by a watch-and-wait strategy between Nov 25, 1991, and Dec 31, 2015. Patients who had not achieved a clinical complete response or who had undergone any surgical procedure were excluded. The criteria used for defining a clinical complete response and the specific surveillance strategies were at the discretion of each participating centre. We used conditional survival modelling to estimate the probability of patients remaining free of local regrowth or distant metastasis for an additional 2 years after sustaining a clinical complete response or being distant metastasis-free for 1, 3, and 5 years from the date of the decision to commence watch and wait. The primary outcomes were conditional local regrowth-free survival at 3 years, and conditional distant metastasis-free survival at 5 years. Findings We identified 793 patients in the IWWD with clinical complete response who had been managed by a watch-and-wait strategy. Median follow-up was 55·2 months (IQR 36·0–75·6). The probability of remaining free from local regrowth for an additional 2 years if a patient had a sustained clinical complete response for 1 year was 88·1% (95% CI 85·8–90·9), for 3 years was 97·3% (95·2–98·6), and for 5 years was 98·6% (97·6–100·0). The probably of remaining free from distant metastasis for a further 2 years in patients who had a clinical complete response without distant metastasis for 1 year was 93·8% (92·3–95·9), for 3 years was 97·8% (96·6–99·3), and for 5 years was 96·6% (94·0–98·9). Interpretation These results suggest that the intensity of active surveillance in patients with rectal cancer managed by a watch-and-wait approach could be reduced if they achieve and maintain a clinical complete response within the first 3 years of starting this approach. Funding European Registration of Cancer Care, financed by the European Society of Surgical Oncology, the Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon, the Bas Mulder Award, granted by the Alpe d’HuZes Foundation and the Dutch Cancer Society, the European Research Council Advanced Grant, and the National Institute of Health and Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.

Highlights • Treatment initiation of T2-T3 rectal cancers with Contact (CXB) provides a fast clinical complete response. • In T2N0< 3 cm tumors, CXB first with chemoradiotherapy can achieve local control in more than 85%. • The Phase III OPERA trial should bring robust data in favor of CXB as initial treatment of T2N0< 3 cm., Introduction A neoadjuvant treatment aimed at rectal preservation should achieve a clinical complete response. This study comparing neoadjuvant treatment initiated with Contact X-ray (CXB) or External Beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is evaluating the influence of the time/dose parameter on clinical response during the first six months. Materials and methods This retrospective consecutive series included T2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma staged using digital examination (DRE), endoscopy, magnetic radiation imaging and/or endorectal ultrasound. All patients were treated with organ preservation intent. Treatment protocol combined CXB (80–110 Gy/3–4 fractions) and EBRT ± concurrent capecitabine. In tumor exceeding 3.5 cm treatment was often initiated using EBRT. Clinical response was assessed (DRE, proctoscopy ± imaging) at very close interval between 2 weeks and 6 months after treatment initiation. Results Between 2002 and 2017, 61 patients (T2: 31; T3: 30) M0 (median age: 76 years) were treated. Treatment was initiated in 40 patients (T2: 28, T3: 12) with contact X-ray and in 21 (T2: 4, T3: 17) with EBRT. Using contact X-ray or EBRT first treatment, clinical complete (or near complete) response at week 14(±1) was respectively 88% [95CI:74–96] and 33% [95CI:15–57]. In multivariate analysis the treatment chronology was the most significant factor influencing cCR (OR: 7.53). At 6 months, with contact X-ray first all patients were in clinical complete response and five with EBRT remained in partial response. With 61 months median follow-up time, the local recurrence rate was 10% [95% CI: 6–16] at 5 years. T3 and fungating tumors were at higher risk of local recurrence. Organ preservation with good function was achieved in 95% of cases. Conclusion This non randomized study tends to show that in early T2-3 tumors, a strategy using upfront contact therapy, which is reducing the overall treatment time, is an option allowing a more favorable outcome than EBRT first.

Striking a balance between cancer treatment and patient-centred care is becoming ever more important in older patients with rectal cancer as the population is ageing. The treatment decision made by the modern multidisciplinary colorectal team will recommend pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery for advance rectal cancer and surgery alone for early rectal cancer, as the "standard of care" is surgery. However, an alternative non-surgical treatment option should be consider for older patients with rectal cancer as the surgical harm can far outweigh the potential benefits. There is published evidence that mortality is higher with increasing age. An alternative treatment option to surgery when patients are not suitable or refusing surgery is to offer them external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or chemo radiotherapy (EBCRT). A proportion of these patients can achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) which enable adoption of 'watch and wait' strategy to avoid surgery. However, a third of patients who achieved initial cCR can develop local regrowth within the first two years. This require salvage surgery which reduces their chance of organ preservation. Contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) or High Dose Rate Endo Brachy Therapy (HDREBT) boost following external beam radiotherapy can improve the initial cCR rate and reduce the risk of local regrowth. Those patients with persistent residual cancer or regrowth after brachytherapy boost following EBCRT or EBRT can have salvage surgery later without compromising their chance of cure. Therefore, patients should be fully aware of their treatment options and have 'a choice' when deciding and consenting their treatment.

Rectal adenocarcinoma is a quite radioresistant tumor. In order to achieve non-operative management (NOM) radiotherapy plays a major role. Targeted radiotherapy aiming at high precision 3D radiotherapy uses stereotactic image-guided external beam radiotherapy machines. To further safely increase the tumor dose, endocavitary brachytherapy (ECB) is an original approach. There are two different ways to perform such an ECB: contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) using a 50 kV X-ray generator with an X-ray tube positioned under eye guidance into the rectal cavity and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) using iridium-192 sources positioned into the rectal cavity under image guidance. This study focused on CXB. CXB uses a small mobile generator that produces 50 kV X-rays with limited penetration. This technique is well adapted to accessible tumors of limited size and especially needs a high dose rate (≥15 Gy/minutes) for rectal tumors. It is performed on an ambulatory basis. A total dose between 80–110 Gy is delivered in 3–4 fractions over 3 to 6 weeks into a small volume (5 cm3). CXB was pioneered in the 1970s by Papillon using the Philips RT 50TM. Since 2009, the Papillon P50TM has been used in 11 institutions in Europe. The OPERA Phase III trial tested the hypothesis that a CXB boost (90 Gy/3 fr) compared to an EBRT boost (9 Gy/5 fr) for T2–T3 ab < 5 cm and N0–N1 < 8 mm will increase the 3-year organ preservation (OP) rate when combined with 45 Gy/5 weeks with concomitant capecitabine. Out of more than 300 patients with tumors < 3 cm (1962–1992), Papillon reported a long-term local control close to 85%. Similar results were published in Europe and USA at that time. The Lyon R96-2 Phase III trial (2004) demonstrated that, when combined with preoperative EBRT, a CXB boost (90 Gy/3 fr) significantly increased the rate of clinical complete response (cCR) and sphincter preservation, with some patients having OP at 10 years. With more than 2000 patients treated in Europe (2010–2020) using the Papillon 50TM, organ preservation appears possible in close to 80% of cases in selected early T2–T3. The OPERA trial closed after 141 inclusions (2015–2020) after an independent data monitoring committee recommendation because of promising results. At the 2-year follow-up (blinded data), the rate of cCR and OP were 77% and 72%, respectively, for the 141 tumors, and for T < 3 cm (61 pts), they were 86% and 85%, respectively, with good bowel function. The final results should be available in 2022. Organ preservation using NOM appears to be a promising approach for rectal cancer. A CXB boost with chemoradiotherapy in selected early T2–T3 could become an attractive option to achieve a planned OP. This approach should be proposed to well-informed patients after discussion in an MDT.

The impact of the tumour volume or size on achieving clinical complete response (cCR) after radio(chemo)therapy is poorly understood. A literature search was performed to gather data on the predictive value of baseline tumour volume or size in achieving cCR. In total, nine reports were identified. In two of three studies evaluating the baseline tumour volumetry, the tumour volume was the most powerful predictor for cCR. In four of six studies evaluating baseline tumour size without volumetry, tumour dimension was significantly associated with cCR, in one study reached borderline significance and in one report was insignificant. In three of four studies where a multivariable analysis was performed, the cT category did not show an independent predictive value for cCR. Because the tumour shape is often (semi)annular, its circumferential rectal extent along with the tumour length probably impact the tumour volume most, and thus, could be considered an acceptable alternative for time-consuming volumetry. Our review suggests that baseline tumour volume (or alternatively, tumour length along with its circumferential rectal extent) is the most relevant clinical predictor of cCR. Therefore, we postulate assessing and reporting these parameters in studies on the watch-and-wait strategy.

Because of the function and anatomical environment of the rectum, therapeutic strategies for local advanced rectal cancer (LARC) must deal with two challenging stressors that are a high-risk of local and distal recurrences and a high-risk of poor quality of life (QoL). Over the last three decades, advances in screening tests, therapies, and combined-modality treatment options and strategies have improved the prognosis of patients with LARC. However, owing to the heterogeneous nature of LARC and genetic status, the patient may not respond to a specific therapy and may be at increased risk of side-effects without the life-prolonging benefit. Indeed, each therapy can cause its own side-effects, which may worsen by a combination of treatments resulting in long-term poor QoL. In LARC, QoL has become even more essential with the increasing incidence of rectal cancer in young individuals. Herein, we analyzed the value of the Immunoscore-Biopsy (performed on tumor biopsy at diagnosis) in predicting outcomes, alone or in association with clinical and imaging data, for each therapy used in LARC.

Multimodal treatment strategies for patients with rectal cancer are increasingly including the possibility of organ preservation, through nonoperative management or local excision. Organ preservation strategies can enable patients with a complete response or near-complete clinical responses after radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy to safely avoid the morbidities associated with radical surgery, and thus to maintain anorectal function and quality of life. However, standardization of the key outcome measures of organ preservation strategies is currently lacking; this includes a lack of consensus of the optimal definitions and selection of primary end points according to the trial phase and design; the optimal time points for response assessment; response-based decision-making; follow-up schedules; use of specific anorectal function tests; and quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. Thus, a consensus statement on outcome measures is necessary to ensure consistency and facilitate more accurate comparisons of data from ongoing and future trials. Here, we have convened an international group of experts with extensive experience in the management of patients with rectal cancer, including organ preservation approaches, and used a Delphi process to establish the first international consensus recommendations for key outcome measures of organ preservation, in an attempt to standardize the reporting of data from both trials and routine practice in this emerging area. Patients with early-stage rectal cancer might potentially benefit from treatment with an organ-sparing approach, which preserves quality of life owing to avoidance of the need for permanent colostomy. Trials conducted to investigate this have so far been hampered by considerable inter-trial heterogeneity in several key features. In this Consensus Statement, the authors provide guidance on the optimal end points, response assessment time points, follow-up procedures and quality of life measures in an attempt to improve the comparability of clinical research in this area. Yorkshire Cancer Research Academic Fellowship fund [L389AA]; Yorkshire Cancer Research; Cancer Research UKCancer Research UK [CRUK/28301]

International audience; We examined whether 66 germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 10 candidate genes would predict clinical outcome in 316 patients with resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) enrolled in the ACCORD-12 phase III trial who were randomly treated with preoperative radiotherapy plus capecitabine (CAP45; n = 155) or dose-intensified radiotherapy plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX50; n = 161). The primary endpoint was tumor response according to the Dworak score. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted on treatment arm and T stage determined the SNPs prognostic and predictive values for tumor response. In univariate analysis, five SNPs in ERCC2, XPA, MTHFR and ERCC1 were associated with the Dworak score in the CAPOX50 arm. In the overall population, interaction with treatment arm was significant for ERCC2 rs1799787 (pinteraction = 0.05) and XPA rs3176683 (pinteraction = 0.008), suggesting a predictive effect for response to oxaliplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT). All but XPA rs3176683 had a prognostic effect on tumor response. In a multivariate model, interaction remained significant for XPA rs3176683 ([OR 7.33, 95% CI 1.40-38.23], pinteraction = 0.018) and the prognostic effect significant for ERCC2 rs1799787 ([OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.32-0.93], p = 0.027) and ERCC1 rs10412761 ([OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.34-0.98], p = 0.042). Patients with the T/G haplotype of rs1799787 and rs10412761 had a 60% decrease in odds of response (p

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and watch-and-wait policy as reported by Habr-Gama are references for organ preservation in rectal cancer. To increase the clinical complete response (cCR) and reduce the local recurrence rates, we report a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of selected T2-3 tumours treated in three French institutions using contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) with nCRT.Tumour selection was based on digital rectal examination (DRE), rigid rectoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or endorectal ultrasound. Adenocarcinoma T2-35 cm largest diameter, M0 were treated, all with organ preservation intent. CXB delivering 90 Gy/3 fractions/4 weeks was combined with CRT (capecitabine 50). Strict evaluation of tumour response using DRE and rectoscopy ± MRI was performed at regular interval with prolonged surveillance.Between 2002 and 2016, 74 consecutive patients were treated (median age: 74 years. T2: 45 and T3: 29). A cCR or near-cCR (mainly rectal wall ulceration) was noted at week 14 in 71 patients (95%). A local excision was performed in 13 patients. Of three partial responses (PRs), one salvage anterior resection was performed. With a median follow-up of 3 years, local recurrence (mainly in the rectal wall) was seen in seven patients. The 3-year local recurrence rate was 10%, and the cancer-specific survival, 88%. Two patients underwent radical proctectomy for PR or local recurrence and 96% preserved their rectum. Grade III acute toxicity was recorded in five patients. Rectal bleeding was the main late toxicity (grade III in 12%). Bowel function was scored as good or excellent in 85% of patients.Combining CXB and nCRT in selected early T2-T3 rectal cancers may safely provide a high rate of cCR, organ preservation, and good bowel function with a risk of local recurrence below 15%. Such an approach could be offered to operable patients as a planned option for organ preservation.

3512 Background: The OPERA trial was testing the hypothesis that Contact x-ray brachytherapy (CXB) 50 kV boost will increase the rectal preservation rate in early T2-T3ab rectal adenocarcinoma. We present the 3 years clinical results. Methods: Inclusion criteria were: Age > 18 years, PS: 0-1, adenocarcinoma, distal - middle rectum, cT2-T3ab cN0-N1 < 8mm staged using MRI, M0. Stratification: T < vs ≥ 3 cm diameter. Control arm (A) was chemoradiotherapy (CRT) 45Gy/ 5 weeks with concurrent chemotherapy (Capecitabine 825 mg / m2) and external beam radiotherapy boost (9Gy/ 5 fr/ 1 week). Experimental arm used the same CRT (Cape 45) but the boost used CXB (90 Gy/ 3 fr/ 4 weeks). CXB was given first (B1) for tumor < 3 cm and after cap 45 (B2) for tumor ≥ 3 cm. Response assessment was made at week 14 after treatment start using palpation, endoscopy and MRI. A new assessment could be made at week 20 and 24 with a second MRI.TME was recommended in case of Partial response, Watch& Wait in case of clinical complete response (cCR). Bowel function measurement used LARS score. Main end- point was: Rate of organ preservation at 3 years. The hypothesis (in 2014) was 20% arm A vs 40% arm B (HR:0.53). Results: Between 5-2015 and 6-2020, 144 patients were included (France 96, UK 44, Switzerland 4). The analysis was made in 01-2022 with a median Follow-up time of 34 months. Treatment compliance was good in ≥ 90% of patients. Table gives main patients characteristics and clinical outcome. At three years the OP rate (Kaplan Meier estimate) was respectively arm A vs B: 60% vs 81% (HR 0.34 [95% CI 0.19 – 0.73]; p= 0.005). At three years OP for group A1 and B1 were: 65% vs 97% (HR 0.081 [95% CI 0.01-0.64]; p= 0.02). Conclusions: A CXB boost, when combined with chemoradiotherapy, increases the rate of organ preservation in early rectal adenocarcinoma. Starting with CXB in T < 3 cm appears as an attractive option. A B A1 (T < 3cm) B1 (T < 3cm) N° patient 71 73 30 32 Median age 68 69 69 70 Gender M/F 45/26 43/30 18/12 18/14 T2/T3 45/26 47/26 25/5 29/3 Distal/middle 53/18 53/20 21/9 27/5 cCR (W 14-24) 61% 90% p < 0.001 70% 94% p = 0.027 TME 26 12 8 1 Death 2 2 1 0 LARS < 30 80% 83% 87% 86%.

3517 Background: The WW strategy for patients with rectal cancer who achieved a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy (nT) allows to avoid major resection and the associated morbidity and mortality. Standardized criteria to select and monitor WW patients, including biomarkers predicting recurrence after nT, are lacking. The prognostic impact of the immune infiltrate in colorectal cancers is now demonstrated and has been implemented into clinics through the Immunoscore, the first standardized digital-pathology-based assay, recommended by academic institutions. We evidenced that an Immunoscore adapted to biopsies (ISB) performed at diagnosis, predicts the response to nT and the risk of recurrence after nT. Its clinical utility was suggested in a test cohort of WW patients (El Sissy et al., Clin Cancer Res 2020). The aim of this study was to confirm the ability of the ISB to predict clinical outcomes, improve patients’ eligibility for the WW strategy, and optimize a follow-up schedule. Methods: A total of 304 WW patients from 10 centers across 7 countries were included. Tumor biopsies before treatment were immunostained for CD3+ and CD8+ T-cells and converted to ISB using the pre-defined cut-off. The primary endpoint was time-to-recurrence (TTR). Secondary endpoint was disease-free-survival (DFS). As immune response originates in draining lymph nodes, signs of immune activation were carried out in lymph nodes of additional patients managed by radical surgery with complete pathological response (pCR; n = 12) or non-pCR (n = 12) by 3' RNA-Seq and immunofluorescence technologies. Results: High-ISB patients presented with the lowest risk of recurrence after WW. 5-year recurrence-free rates were 97% (92%-100%), 61% (49%-76%), and 56% (44%-73%) with ISB High, Intermediate, and Low, respectively (HR [Low-vs-High] = 14.3, 95% CI 1.8-100). In patients with cCR after nT (n = 209), High-ISB showed a significant association with prolonged TTR and DFS (Logrank P = 0.005 and P = 0.006, respectively). When ISB was evaluated as a continuous variable, the risk of recurrence was increasing along with decreasing ISB (Wald tests, all P < 0.005). In multivariate analyses, ISB was independent of age, sex, location, and cTNM stage and was the single parameter correlated with TTR (HR [ISB High-vs-Low] = 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.6; P = 0.015) and DFS (P = 0.013). Unlike for patients with cCR, no difference according to ISB was observed for those with incomplete response (n = 41) or treated with brachytherapy (n = 34). Finally, intranodal signs of T-cell and B-cell activation were only evidenced in patients with pCR. Conclusions: ISB provides a reliable biomarker to predict clinical outcomes, improve eligibility, and optimize patients’ follow-up. Intranodal T-cell and B-cell activation further supports the immune benefit of both organ and lymph node preservation.

The Papillon experience and the Lyon R96-02 trial have shown that contact X-ray brachytherapy of 50kV is efficient and safe to achieve long term local control and organ preservation for cT1 and early cT2-3 rectal cancers. The OPERA trial, using the Papillon 50™ machine, brings further support to this preservation strategy for selected T2T3ab lesions. Future trials using a contact X-ray boost will try to consolidate and enlarge its place in organ preservation for rectal cancers.

Purpose To develop French guidelines by experts to standardize data acquisition, image interpretation, and reporting in rectal cancer staging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and methods Evidence-based data and opinions of experts of GRECCAR (Groupe de REcherche en Radiologie sur le CAncer du Rectum [i.e., Rectal Cancer Imaging Research Group]) and GRECAR (Groupe de REcherche en Chirurgie sur le CAncer du Rectum [i.e., Rectal Cancer Surgery Research Group]) were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method to attain consensus guidelines. Experts scoring of reporting template and protocol for data acquisition were collected; responses were analyzed and classified as “Recommended” versus “Not recommended” (when ≥ 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (when Results Consensus regarding patient preparation, MRI sequences, staging and reporting was attained using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. A consensus was reached for each reporting template item among the experts. Tailored MRI protocol and standardized report were proposed. Conclusion These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for rectal cancer staging with MRI.

Purpose: Optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (Nad-CRT) is still controversial in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The primary goal of this study was to determine the best surgical interval (SI) to achieve the highest rate of pathological complete response (pCR) and secondly to evaluate the effect on survival outcomes according to the SI.Patients and methods: Patients data were extracted from the international randomized trials: Accord12/0405, EORTC22921, FFCD9203, CAO/ARO/AIO-94, CAO-ARO-AIO-04, INTERACT and TROG01.04. Inclusion criteria were: age >= 18, cT3-T4 and cN0-2, no clinical evidence of distant metastasis at diagnosis, Nad-CRT followed by surgery.Pearson's Chi-squared test with Yates' continuity correction for categorical variables, the MannWhitney test for continuous variables, Mann-Kendall test, Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test, univariate and multivariate logistic regression model was used for data analysis. Results: 3085 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the pCR rate was 14% at a median SI of 6 weeks (range 1-31). The cumulative pCR rate increased significantly when SI lengthened, with 95% of pCR events within 10 weeks from Nad-CRT.At univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, lengthening of SI (p< 0.01), radiotherapy dose (p< 0.01), and the addition of oxaliplatin to Nad-CRT (p< 0.01) had a favorable impact on pCR. Furthermore, lengthening of SI was not impact on local recurrences, distance metastases, and overall survival.Conclusion: This pooled analysis suggests that the best time to achieve pCR in LARC is at 10 weeks, considering that the lengthening of SI is not detrimental concerning survival outcomes. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Purpose: No biomarker to personalize treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is currently available. We assessed in LARC whether a diagnostic biopsy-adapted immunoscore (ISB) could predict response to neoadjuvant treatment (nT) and better define patients eligible to an organ preservation strategy (“Watch-and-Wait”). Experimental Design: Biopsies from two independent cohorts (n1 = 131, n2 = 118) of patients with LARC treated with nT followed by radical surgery were immunostained for CD3+ and CD8+ T cells and quantified by digital pathology to determine ISB. The expression of immune-related genes post-nT was investigated (n = 64 patients). Results were correlated with response to nT and disease-free survival (DFS). The ISB prognostic performance was further assessed in a multicentric cohort (n = 73 patients) treated by Watch-and-Wait. Results: ISB positively correlated with the degree of histologic response (P < 0.001) and gene expression levels for Th1 orientation and cytotoxic immune response, post-nT (P = 0.006). ISB high identified patients at lower risk of relapse or death compared with ISB low [HR, 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.06–0.78; P = 0.009]. Prognostic performance of ISB for DFS was confirmed in a validation cohort. ISB was an independent parameter, more informative than pre- (P < 0.001) and post-nT (P < 0.05) imaging to predict DFS. ISB combined with imaging post-nT discriminated very good responders that could benefit from organ preservation strategy. In the “Watch-and-Wait” cohort (n = 73), no relapse was observed in patients with ISB high (23.3%). Conclusions: ISB predicts response to nT and survival in patients with LARC treated by surgery. Its usefulness in the selection of patients eligible for a Watch-and-Wait strategy is strongly suggested.

BACKGROUND: The strategy of watch and wait (W&W) in patients with rectal cancer who achieve a complete clinical response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy is new and offers an opportunity for patients to avoid major resection surgery. However, evidence is based on small-to-moderate sized series from specialist centres. The International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD) aims to describe the outcome of the W&W strategy in a large-scale registry of pooled individual patient data. We report the results of a descriptive analysis after inclusion of more than 1000 patients in the registry.METHODS: Participating centres entered data in the registry through an online, highly secured, and encrypted research data server. Data included baseline characteristics, neoadjuvant therapy, imaging protocols, incidence of local regrowth and distant metastasis, and survival status. All patients with rectal cancer in whom the standard of care (total mesorectal excision surgery) was omitted after neoadjuvant therapy were eligible to be included in the IWWD. For the present analysis, we only selected patients with no signs of residual tumour at reassessment (a cCR). We analysed the proportion of patients with local regrowth, proportion of patients with distant metastases, 5-year overall survival, and 5-year disease-specific survival.FINDINGS: Between April 14, 2015, and June 30, 2017, we identified 1009 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment and were managed by W&W in the database from 47 participating institutes (15 countries). We included 880 (87%) patients with a cCR. Median follow-up time was 3·3 years (95% CI 3·1-3·6). The 2-year cumulative incidence of local regrowth was 25·2% (95% CI 22·2-28·5%), 88% of all local regrowth was diagnosed in the first 2 years, and 97% of local regrowth was located in the bowel wall. Distant metastasis were diagnosed in 71 (8%) of 880 patients. 5-year overall survival was 85% (95% CI 80·9-87·7%), and 5-year disease-specific survival was 94% (91-96%).INTERPRETATION: This dataset has the largest series of patients with rectal cancer treated with a W&W approach, consisting of approximately 50% data from previous cohort series and 50% unpublished data. Local regrowth occurs mostly in the first 2 years and in the bowel wall, emphasising the importance of endoscopic surveillance to ensure the option of deferred curative surgery. Local unsalvageable disease after W&W was rare.FUNDING: European Registration of Cancer Care financed by European Society of Surgical Oncology, Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon, Bas Mulder Award granted by the Alpe d'Huzes Foundation and Dutch Cancer Society, and European Research Council Advanced Grant.

With an expanding elderly population and median rectal cancer detection age of 70 years, the prevalence of rectal cancer in elderly patients is increasing. Management is based on evidence from younger patients, resulting in substandard treatments and poor outcomes. Modern management of rectal cancer in the elderly demands patient-centered treatment, assessing frailty rather than chronological age. The heterogeneity of this group, combined with the limited available data, impedes drafting evidence based guidelines. Therefore, a multidisciplinary task force convened experts from the European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society of Coloproctology, International Society of Geriatric Oncology and the American College Surgeons Commission on Cancer, with the goal of identifying the best practice to promote personalized rectal cancer care in older patients. A crucial element for personalized care was recognized as the routine screening for frailty and geriatrician involvement and personalized care for frail patients. Careful patient selection and improved surgical and perioperative techniques are responsible for a substantial improvement in rectal cancer outcomes. Therefore, properly selected patients should be considered for surgical resection. Local excision can be utilized when balancing oncologic outcomes, frailty and life expectancy. Watch and wait protocols, in expert hands, are valuable for selected patients and adjuncts can be added to improve complete response rates. Functional recovery and patient-reported outcomes are as important as oncologic-specific outcomes in this age group. The above recommendations and others were made based on the best-available evidence to guide the personalized treatment of elderly patients with rectal cancer. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Contact X ray brachytherapy 50 kVp was initiated in the 1930s with the Siemens unit and popularized with the Philips unit in the 1950s. A renaissance was seen in the early 2000s with the Intrabeam™ unit for breast IORT. Presently the Papillon™ systems thanks to its high dose rate (> 10 Gy/mn) can be used to treat breast (IORT), skin, eyelid and rectal cancers. Future developments are expected to consolidate the place of contact radiotherapy as a safe and efficient treatment for accessible early tumors.

12 Background: Non-operative modality (NOM) treatment of rectal cancer is gaining popularity as it avoids extirpative TME surgery and a stoma. OPERA trial was set up to evaluate the role of dose escalation using Contact X-ray brachytherapy [CXB] in improving the chance of organ preservation compared to the standard of care (EBCRT and TME surgery). We report on the preliminary surgical salvage data for treatment failures in the OPERA trial (NCT02505750). Methods: OPERA is a European phase 3 randomised trial between (Arm A- standard arm) EBCRT 45Gy/25/5weeks with oral capecitabine 825mg/m2 and EBRT boost of 9Gy/5/5 days randomised against (Arm B- experimental arm) EBCRT followed by CXB boost (90 Gy/3/4 weeks). Patients were assessed at 14, 20 and 24 weeks. Watch & wait policy was adopted for patients with cCR at 24 weeks after randomisation and surgery (TME or local excision) was offered for residual disease and also for local regrowth (recurrence) at a later date. Results: From July 2015 –June 2020, 148 patients were randomised of which 144 were evaluable (table). There were 71 patients in Arm A (standard) and 73 patients in Arm B (experimental). Median follow-up was 19 months (range 2-36 m). Overall clinical complete response (cCR) was observed in 103 out of 127 evaluable patients (81%) at 24 week in both arms (blinded). Surgery was carried out in 36/ 127 (28%) patients with suspected residual tumour. Further 13 patients had salvage surgery at a later date for local regrowth. At 19 months, 49/144 (34%) patients in total cohort had surgery. Local excision was carried out in 24 /49(49%) of which 3 proceeded to TME surgery due to R (1) or ypT2 adverse histology. TME surgery was carried out in 28/49 of which 8/28 (28.6%) had APER and 20/28(71.4%) had AR. In total, organ preservation (blinded) was achieved in 116/144 (80.5%) for the whole cohort. Kaplan Meier estimate of TME free survival is 76% at 19 months. Conclusions: Non-TME surgical treatment for cT2-cT3a-b rectal cancer is feasible in those who are fit and wish to avoid surgery (Watch & Wait). Those who needed surgery can be offered salvage surgery immediately for local residual disease or for local regrowth at a later date. Organ preservation of 80.5% (blinded) can be achieved without compromising their chance of cure. Clinical trial information: NCT02505750. [Table: see text]

Purpose The Lyon R90-01 randomized trial investigated whether the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery influenced rectal cancer outcome. Long-term results are reported here after a median follow-up of 17 years. Methods and Materials Between February 1991 and December 1995, 210 patients from 29 French centers were randomly assigned (ratio of 1:1) to groups that waited either 2 weeks (short interval [SI]) or 6 to 8 weeks (long interval [LI]) between neoadjuvant radiation therapy and surgery. The primary endpoint was sphincter-preserving surgery. Results LI group showed a better pathologic response (complete response or few residual cells) after radiation therapy than the SI group (26% vs 10.3%, P =.015). A better pathologic response was associated in multivariate analysis with significant improvement of overall survival (pT: P =.0293 and pN: P =.0048) but it was irrespective of the interval duration. The median follow-up was 17.2 years. The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 17-year overall survival rates were, respectively, 66.8%, 48.7%, 40.0%, and 34.0% for the SI group and, respectively, 67.1%, 53.5%, 41.9%, and 34.0% for the LI group. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of survival ( P =.7656) or local recurrence rates (SI: 14.4% vs LI: 12.1%, respectively; P =.6202). Of 24 local disease recurrences, 20 (83%) occurred during the first 2 postoperative years, and all but one (96%) occurred during the first 5 postoperative years. The rate of second new malignancies was 9.4% (19 patients). Conclusions The radiation-induced sterilization rate of the preoperative cancer specimen was a marker of good prognosis. The interval duration (the treatment being the same) although it is modifying the sterilization rate has no impact on survival. Radiation therapy did not postpone local recurrence, because the rate of local relapse after 5 years was low. Radiation-induced cancers after radiation therapy were unusual and should not influence treatment decisions in adults.

Resume Objectif de l’etude Cette etude retrospective a evalue les modalites de prise en charge et le pronostic des cancers du rectum chez le sujet âge en comparaison avec ceux des sujets plus jeunes. Patients et methodes Les donnees de 160 patients de plus 80 ans, ayant recu un traitement pour un cancer du rectum diagnostique entre 2006 et 2008, en region Provence-Alpes-Cote-d’Azur, independamment du stade et du traitement de la maladie ont ete analysees retrospectivement. Les taux de survie globale et sans rechute ont ete correles avec les caracteristiques de la tumeur et les traitements administres. Le traitement administre a ensuite ete compare aux standards therapeutiques recommandes pour les patients plus jeunes. Resultats Avec 36 mois de suivi median, les taux de survie globale et sans rechute a 3 ans etaient respectivement de 59,2 % et 76,6 % pour les 117 patients ayant recu un traitement a visee curative. En analyse multifactorielle, la survie globale etait independamment influencee par le statut N et l’exerese chirurgicale, alors que la survie sans rechute etait influencee par l’âge, le statut N, et le sexe. Les tumeurs de stade T0–T2 ont ete traitees conformement aux recommandations pour les patients plus jeunes, avec respectivement des taux a 3 ans de 83,6 % et 95,2 % de survie globale et de survie sans rechute. Pour les patients atteints de tumeur de stade T3–T4, le taux de survie sans rechute a 3 ans etait de 65 %, malgre une strategie moins agressive. Conclusion Sous reserve d’une bonne evaluation oncogeriatrique, la chirurgie reste le standard de traitement des tumeurs localisees (de stade T0–T2) des patients âges. Pour les tumeurs localement evoluees (de stade T3–T4), les resultats obtenus dans cette etude suggerent qu’une approche conservatrice pourrait etre envisagee.

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost in anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Material and methods This was a monocentric retrospective study involving patients treated by external irradiation (± chemotherapy), with HDR-BT boost, for a localized ASCC. Clinical evaluation was performed every six months. Oncological results were analyzed with: local relapse-free survival (LRFS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), metastatic-free survival (MFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Acute and late toxicities were collected (CTCV4.0) and LENT/SOMA score was performed. Results From May 2005 to January 2018, 46 patients (pts) were analyzed. The median follow-up was 61 months (10-145 months), the median age was 65 years (34-84 years), with a sex ratio M/F = 0.24. The TNM classification was as follows: T1 - 13 pts (21.7%), T2 - 34 pts (73.9%), T3 - 2 pts (4.3%), N+ - 6 pts (13.1%). External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) delivered a median dose of 45 Gy (36-50.4 Gy) in 25 fractions, and HDR-BT 12 Gy (10-18 Gy) in 3 fractions. The median overall treatment time (OTT) was 58 days (41-101 days), with a median EBRT/brachytherapy interval of 17 days (4-60 days). Oncological findings showed 5-year rates of LRFS 81.2%, MFS 88.7%, DFS 70%, and OS 90%. All abdominoperineal amputations were performed in case of local relapse (4 pts, 8.7%), leading to a 5-year CFS of 79.5%. Acute urinary toxicities were frequent (G1 41.3%, G2 4.3%). The acute digestive toxicities were: G1 71.7%, G2 6.5%, and G3 2.2%. The late urinary toxicities were: G1 4.3%, G2 2.2%, and G3 2.2%. Late digestive toxicities were: G1 56.5%, G2 8.7%, G3 2.2%, and G4 2.2%. Conclusions In ASCC management, HDR-BT boost appears to be a treatment with a long-term acceptable toxicity profile, shorter than EBRT boost, with a reduction of side effects.

In August 2013, the French nuclear safety agency (ASN) requested the permanent group of experts in radiation protection in medicine (GPMED) to propose recommendations on the implementation of new technology and techniques in radiation oncology. These recommendations were finalized in February 2015 by the GPMED. In April 2015, the ASN sent a letter to the French ministry of health (DGS/DGOS), and its national health agencies (ANSM, INCa, HAS). In these letters, ASN proposed that, from the 12 recommendations made by the GPMED, an action plan should be established, whose control could be assigned to the French national cancer institute (INCa), as a pilot of the national committee for radiotherapy and that this proposal has to be considered at the next meeting of the national committee of radiotherapy.

Rectal cancers stages II–III are presenting many various clinical situations. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a standard of care in many cases, and in association with TME surgery, local relapses are becoming uncommon. None of these neoadjuvant treatments have so far improved survival, and quality of life remains non-optimal after abdomino-perineal resection and quite often after anterior resection. To increase survival through sterilization of subclinical distant metastases, new induction chemotherapy is tested. In T4 tumors, radiation dose escalation should be able to further improve local control, and in elderly patients, reduction of nCRT toxicity may provide better compliance to TME surgery. A promising approach is the use of optimal neoadjuvant treatment in early tumors in order to achieve a clinical complete response and propose an organ preservation either after local excision or using a meticulous and prolonged watch and wait strategy. Well-conducted randomized trials will be necessary to modify the present standard of care.

Background During the ACCORD 12 randomized trial, an evaluation of the clinical tumor response was prospectively performed after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The correlations between clinical complete response and patient characteristics and treatment outcomes are reported. Material and methods Between 2005 and 2008 the Accord 12 trial accrued 598 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and compared two different neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapies (Capox 50: capecitabine+oxaliplatin+50Gy vs Cap 45: capecitabine+45Gy). An evaluation of the clinical tumor response with rectoscopy and digital rectal examination was planned before surgery. A score to classify tumor response was used adapted from the RECIST definition: complete response: no visible or palpable tumor; partial response, stable and progressive disease. Results The clinical tumor response was evaluable in 201 patients. Score was: complete response: 8% (16 patients); partial response: 68% (137 patients); stable: 21%; progression: 3%. There was a trend toward more complete response in the Capox 50 group (9.3% vs 6.7% with Cap 45). In the whole cohort of 201 pts complete response was significantly more frequent in T2 tumors (28%; p =0.025); tumors p =0.017), less than half rectal circumference and with a normal CEA level. Clinical complete response observed in 16 patients was associated with more conservative treatment ( p =0.008): 2 patients required an abdomino-perineal resection, 11 an anterior resection and 3 patients benefited from organ preservation (2 local excision, 1 "watch and wait". A complete response was associated with more ypT0 (73%; p Conclusion These data support the hypothesis that a clinical complete response assessed using rectoscopy and digital rectal examination after neoadjuvant therapy may increase the chance of a sphincter or organ preservation in selected rectal cancers.