1. Evidence-based Assessment in Pediatric Psychology: Measures of Psychosocial Adjustment and Psychopathology
- Author
-
Mona Abad, Jean Mennuti-Washburn, Elizabeth Franks Bruno, Jocelyn Smith Carter, Judy Garber, Corinne David-Ferdon, Pamela J. Bachanas, Karen Bearman Miller, Kerry O’Mahar, Azure Welborn Thill, Jill Zukerman, Barbara Jandasek, and Grayson N. Holmbeck
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Evidence-Based Medicine ,Evidence-based practice ,Psychometrics ,Psychopathology ,Mental Disorders ,Pediatric psychology ,Reproducibility of Results ,Articles ,Evidence-based medicine ,Personality Assessment ,Rating scale ,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,medicine ,Humans ,Personality Assessment Inventory ,Child ,Psychiatry ,Psychology ,Social Adjustment ,Psychosocial ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Objective To provide an evidence-based review of measures of psychosocial adjustment and psychopathology, with a specific focus on their use in the field of pediatric psychology. Methods As part of a larger survey of pediatric psychologists from the Society of Pediatric Psychology e-mail listserv (American Psychological Association, APA, Division 54), 37 measures were selected for this psychometric review. Measures that qualified for the review fell into one of the following three categories: (a) internalizing or externalizing rating scales, (b) broad-band rating scales, and (c) self-related rating scales. Results Psychometric characteristics (i.e., three types of reliability, two types of validity) were strong for the majority of measures reviewed, with 34 of the 37 measures meeting “well-established” evidence-based assessment (EBA) criteria. Strengths and weaknesses of existing measures were noted. Conclusions Recommendations for future work in this area of assessment are presented, including suggestions that more fine-grained EBA criteria be developed and that evidence-based “profiles” be devised for each measure.
- Published
- 2008