44 results on '"Jazmati D"'
Search Results
2. Feasibility of Proton Beam Therapy for Infants with Brain Tumours: Experiences from the Prospective KiProReg Registry Study
- Author
-
Jazmati, D., Steinmeier, T., Ahamd Khalil, D., Frisch, S., Peters, S., Schulze Schleithoff, S., Bäumer, C., Rutkowski, S., Frühwald, M.C., Blase, C., Tippelt, S., and Timmermann, B.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Interobserver agreement on definition of the target volume in stereotactic radiotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma using different imaging modalities
- Author
-
Gkika, E; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5455-252X, Kostyszyn, D, Fechter, T, Moustakis, C, Ernst, F, Boda-Heggemann, J, Sarria, G, Dieckmann, K, Dobiasch, S, Duma, M N, Eberle, F, Kroeger, K, Häussler, B, Izaguirre, V, Jazmati, D, Lautenschläger, S, Lohaus, F, Mantel, F, Menzel, J, Pachmann, S, Pavic, M, Radlanski, K, Riesterer, O, Gerum, S, Röder, F, Willner, J, Barczyk, S, Imhoff, D, Blanck, O, Wittig, A, et al, Guckenberger, M, Gkika, E; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5455-252X, Kostyszyn, D, Fechter, T, Moustakis, C, Ernst, F, Boda-Heggemann, J, Sarria, G, Dieckmann, K, Dobiasch, S, Duma, M N, Eberle, F, Kroeger, K, Häussler, B, Izaguirre, V, Jazmati, D, Lautenschläger, S, Lohaus, F, Mantel, F, Menzel, J, Pachmann, S, Pavic, M, Radlanski, K, Riesterer, O, Gerum, S, Röder, F, Willner, J, Barczyk, S, Imhoff, D, Blanck, O, Wittig, A, et al, and Guckenberger, M
- Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate interobserver agreement (IOA) on target volume definition for pancreatic cancer (PACA) within the Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy Working Group of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) and to identify the influence of imaging modalities on the definition of the target volumes. METHODS Two cases of locally advanced PACA and one local recurrence were selected from a large SBRT database. Delineation was based on either a planning 4D CT with or without (w/wo) IV contrast, w/wo PET/CT, and w/wo diagnostic MRI. Novel compared to other studies, a combination of four metrics was used to integrate several aspects of target volume segmentation: the Dice coefficient (DSC), the Hausdorff distance (HD), the probabilistic distance (PBD), and the volumetric similarity (VS). RESULTS For all three GTVs, the median DSC was 0.75 (range 0.17-0.95), the median HD 15 (range 3.22-67.11) mm, the median PBD 0.33 (range 0.06-4.86), and the median VS was 0.88 (range 0.31-1). For ITVs and PTVs the results were similar. When comparing the imaging modalities for delineation, the best agreement for the GTV was achieved using PET/CT, and for the ITV and PTV using 4D PET/CT, in treatment position with abdominal compression. CONCLUSION Overall, there was good GTV agreement (DSC). Combined metrics appeared to allow a more valid detection of interobserver variation. For SBRT, either 4D PET/CT or 3D PET/CT in treatment position with abdominal compression leads to better agreement and should be considered as a very useful imaging modality for the definition of treatment volumes in pancreatic SBRT. Contouring does not appear to be the weakest link in the treatment planning chain of SBRT for PACA.
- Published
- 2023
4. Interobserver agreement on definition of the target volume in stereotactic radiotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma using different imaging modalities
- Author
-
Gkika, E, Kostyszyn, D, Fechter, T, Moustakis, C, Ernst, F, Boda-Heggemann, J, Sarria, G, Dieckmann, K, Dobiasch, S, Duma, M N, Eberle, F, Kroeger, K, Häussler, B, Izaguirre, V, Jazmati, D, Lautenschläger, S, Lohaus, F, Mantel, F, Menzel, J, Pachmann, S, Pavic, M, Radlanski, K, Riesterer, O, Gerum, S, Röder, F, Willner, J, Barczyk, S, Imhoff, D, Blanck, O, Wittig, A, et al, and Guckenberger, M
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Treatment of Lymph Fistula after Vascular Surgery with Low-Dose Radiotherapy
- Author
-
Jazmati, D., primary, Boelke, E., additional, Budach, W., additional, Haussmann, J., additional, Tamaskovics, B., additional, Corradini, S., additional, and Matuschek, C., additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Low-Dose Radiotherapy for Heel Spur Treatment: A Retrospective Study of Efficacy and Safety
- Author
-
Karimi, K., Jazmati, D., Boelke, E., Budach, W., Haussmann, J., Tamaskovic, B., and Matuschek, C.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Fractionation Sensitivity in Childhood Medulloblastoma: A Roadmap for Individualized Radiotherapy
- Author
-
Matuschek, C., Sohn, D., Budach, W., Haussmann, J., Boelke, E., Tamaskovics, B.F., and Jazmati, D.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Die Rolle der postneoadjuvanten Therapie beim Mammakarzinom
- Author
-
Matuschek, C., additional, Jazmati, D., additional, Bölke, E., additional, Corradini, S., additional, Budach, W., additional, Tamskocovics, B., additional, and Haussmann, J., additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. PO-1076 Do patients with rmHNC treated with checkpoint inhibitors benefit form additional radiotherapy?
- Author
-
Tamaskovics, B., primary, Haussmann, J., additional, Jazmati, D., additional, Neuwahl, J., additional, Rezazadeh, A., additional, Bölke, E., additional, Budach, W., additional, and Matuschek, C., additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Hippocampal Sparing Radiotherapy in adults with Primary Brain Tumors: A comparative planning and dosimetric study using IMPT, IMRT and 3DCRT
- Author
-
Aka, P, Taylor, R, Hugtenburg, R, Lambert, J, Powell, J, Bevolo, T, Gao, M, Gondi, V, Hartsell, W.H, Bolsi, A, Beer, J, Belosi, M.F, Siewert, D, Lomax, A.J, Weber, D.C, Huang, Y.J, Huang, C.C, Chao, P.J, Liu, C, Shang, H, Ding, X, Wang, Y, Mammar, H, Froelich, Sébastien, Alapetite, Claire, Bolle, Stéphanie, Calugaru, Valentin, Feuvret, Loic, Helfre, Sylvie, Champion, Laurence, Goudjil, Farid, Dendal, Remi, Engelholm, S.A, Munck Af Rosenschold, P, Kristensen, I, Smulders, B, Muhic, A, Alkner, S, Jacob, E, Engelholm, S, Aljabab, S, Lui, A, Wong, T, Liao, J, Laramore, G, Parvathaneni, U, Kharouta, M, Pidikiti, R, Jesseph, F, Smith, M, Dobbins, D, Mattson, D, Choi, S, Mansur, D, Machtay, M, Bhatt, A, Lütgendorf-Caucig, C, Dunavölgyi, R, Georg, P, Perpar, A, Fussl, C, Konstantinovic, R, Ulrike, M, Piero, F, Eugen, H, Vidal, M, Gerard, A, Barnel, C, Maneval, D, Herault, J, Claren, A, Doyen, J, Dendale, R, Toutee, A, Pasquie, I, Goudjil, F, Lumbroso Lerouic, L, Levy, C, Desjardins, L, Cassoux, N, Elisei, G, Pella, A, Calvi, G, Ricotti, R, Tagaste, B, Valvo, F, Ciocca, M, Via, R, Mastella, E, Baroni, G, Saotome, N, Yonai, S, Makishima, H, Hara, Y, Inaniwa, T, Sakama, M, Kanematsu, N, Tsuji, H, Furukawa, T, Shirai, T, Sauerwein, W, Finger, P.T, Gallie, B, Gavrylyuk, Y, Thariat, J, Salleron, J, Maschi, C, Fevrier, E, Caujolle, J.P, Hofverberg, P, Angellier, G, Peyrichon, M.L, Breneman, J, Esslinger, H, Pater, L, Vatner, R, Habrand, J.L, Stefan, D, Lesueur, P, Kao, W, Véla, A, Geffrelot, J, Tessonnier, T, Balosso, J, Mahé, M.A, Lim, P.S, Rompokos, V, Chang, Y.C, Royle, G, Gaze, M, Gains, J, Vennarini, S, Francesco, F, Rombi, B, Amichetti, M, Schwarz, M, Lorentini, S, Mee, T, Burnet, N.G, Crellin, A, Kirkby, N.F, Smith, E, Kirkby, K.J, Roggio, M, Buwenge, M, Melchionda, F, Ammendolia, I, Ronchi, L, Cammelli, S, Morganti, A.G, Youn, S.H, Kim, J.Y, Park, H.J, Shin, S.H, Lee, S.H, Hong, E.K, Czerska, K, Winczura, P, Wejs-Maternik, J, Blukis, A, Antonowicz-Szydlowska, M, Rucinski, A, Olko, P, Badzio, A, Kopec, R, Franceschini, D, Cozzi, L, De Rose, F, Meattini, I, Fogliata, A, Cozzi, S, Becherini, C, Tomatis, S, Livi, L, Scorsetti, M, Garda, A, Fattahi, S, Michel, A, Mutter, R, Yan, E, Park, S, Corbin, K, Giap, H, LAM, W.W, Geng, H, Tang, K.K, Lee, T.Y, Kong, C.W, Yang, B, Chiu, T.L, Cheung, K.Y, Yu, S.K, Ma, M, Gao, X, Zhao, Z, Zhao, B, Mullikin, T, Routman, D, Yu, J, Greco, K, Fagundes, M, Shan, J, Daniels, T, Rule, W, DeWees, T, Hu, Y, Bues, M, Sio, T, Liu, W, chenbin, L, yuehu, P, yuenan, W, Bai, Y, Gao, X.S, Zhao, Z.L, Ma, M.W, Ren, X.Y, Salem, A, Woolf, D, Aznar, M, Azadeh, A, Eccles, C, Charlwood, F, Faivre-Finn, C, Teoh, S, Fiorini, F, George, B, Vallis, K, Van den Heuvel, F, Huang, E.Y, Juang, P.J, Pan, S, Hawkins, M, Clarke, M, Lowe, M, Radhakrishna, G, Schaub, S, Bowen, S, Nyflot, M, Chapman, T, Apisarnthanarax, S, Vitek, P, Kubes, J, Vondracek, V, Vinakurau, S, Zamecnik, L, Vitolo, V, Barcellini, A, Brugnatelli, S, Cobianchi, L, Vanoli, A, Fossati, P, Facoetti, A, Dionigi, P, Orecchia, R, Iannalfi, A, Vischioni, B, Ronchi, S, D’Ippolito, E, Petrucci, R, Yamaguchi, H, Honda, M, Hamada, K, Todate, Y, Seto, I, Suzuki, M, Wada, H, Murakami, M, Yu, Z, Zheng, W, Lien-Chun, L, Zhengshan, H, Qing, Z, Jiade, L, Guoliang, J, Fiore, M.R, D'Ippolito, E, Fukumitsu, N, Hayakawa, T, Yamashita, T, Mima, M, Demizu, Y, Suzuki, T, Soejima, T, Hartsell, W, Collins, S, Casablanca, V, Mihalcik, S, Brennan, E, Van Nispen, A, Corbett, A, Mohammed, N, Lee, P, van Nispen, A, Liang, Y.S, Mein, S, Kopp, B, Choi, K, Haberer, T, Debus, J, Abdollahi, A, Mairani, A, Ogino, H, Iwata, H, Hashimoto, S, Nakajima, K, Hattori, Y, Nomura, K, Shibamoto, Y, Li, P, Wu, S, Deng, L, Zhang, G, Zhang, Q, Fu, S, Yang, Z, Zhang, Y, Sasaki, R, Okimoto, T, Akasaka, H, Miyawaki, D, Yoshida, K, Wang, T, Komatsu, S, Fukumoto, T, Shuang, W, Xin, C, zhengshan, H, Shen, F, Vorobyov, N, Andreev, G, Martynova, N, Lyubinsky, A, Kubasov, A, Chen, J, Ma, N, Lu, Y, Zhao, J, Shahnazi, K, Lu, J, Jiang, G, Mao, J, Walser, M, Bojaxhiu, B, Kawashiro, S, Tran, S, Pica, A, Bachtiary, B, Weber, D, Gaito, S, Abravan, A, Richardson, J, Colaco, R, Saunders, D, Brennan, B, Petersen, I, Ahmed, S, Laack, N, Mizoe, J.E, Iizumi, T, Minohara, S, Kusano, Y, Matsuzaki, Y, Tsuchida, K, Serizawa, I, Yoshida, D, Katoh, H, Sakurai, H, Tujii, H, Kim, T.H, Park, J.W, Bo Hyun, K, Hyunjung, K, Sung Ho, M, Sang Soo, K, Sang Myung, W, Young-Hwan, K, Woo Jin, L, Dae Yong, K, Hong, Z, Wang, Z, Koroulakis, A, Molitoris, J, Kaiser, A, Hanna, N, Jiang, Y, Regine, W, DeCesaris, C.M, Choi, J.I, Carr, S.R, Burrows, W.M, Regine, W.F, Simone, C.B, Aihara, T, Hiratsuka, J, Kamitani, N, Higashino, M, Kawata, R, Kumada, H, Ono, K, Chou, Y.C, Dippolito, E, Bonora, M, Alterio, D, Gandini, S, Jereczeck, B.A, Kelly, C, Dobeson, C, Iqbal, S, Chatterjee, S, Hague, C, Li, T, Lin, A, Lukens, J, Slevin, N, Thomson, D, van Herk, M, West, C, Teo, K, Jeans, E, Manzar, G, Patel, S, Ma, D, Lester, S, Foote, R, Friborg, J, Jensen, K, Hansen, C.R, Andersen, E, Andersen, M, Eriksen, J.G, Johansen, J, Overgaard, J, Grau, C, Dědečková, K, Vítek, P, Ondrová, B, Sláviková, S, Zapletalová, S, Zapletal, R, Vondráček, V, Rotnáglová, E, Kwanghyun, J, Woojin, L, Dongryul, O, Yong Chan, A, Paudel, N, Schmidt, S, Ruckman, M, Gans, S, Stauffer, M, Helenowski, I, Patel, U, Samant, S, Gentile, M, Damico, N, Yao, M, Shuja, M, Routman, D.M, Foote, R.L, Garces, Y.I, Neben-Wittich, M.A, Patel, S.H, McGee, L.A, Harmsen, W.S, Ma, D.J, Sommat, K, Tong, A.K.T, Hu, J, Ong, A.L.K, Wang, F, Sin, S.Y, Wee, T.S, Tan, W.K, Fong, K.W, Soong, Y.L, Wallace, N, Fredericks, S, Fitzgerald, T, Vernimmen, F, Petringa, G, Cirrone, P, Agosteo, S, Attili, A, Cammarata, F.P, Cuttone, G, Conte, V, La Tessa, C, Manti, L, Rosenfeld, A, Lojacono, P.A, Hennings, F, Fattori, G, Peroni, M, Lomax, A, Hrbacek, J, Nguyen, H.G, Bach Cuadra, M, Sznitman, R, Schalenbourg, A, Pflaeger, A, Weber, A, Seidel, S, Stark, R, Heufelder, J, Mailhot Vega, R, Bradley, J, Lockney, N, Macdonald, S, Liang, X, Mazal, A, Mendenhall, N, Sher, D, Korreman, S.S, Andreasen, S, Petersen, J.B, Offersen, B.V, Gergelis, K, Jethwa, K, Whitaker, T, Shiraishi, S, Shumway, D, Press, R, Shelton, J, Zhang, C, Dang, Q, Tian, S, Shu, T, Seldon, C, Jani, A, Zhou, J, McDonald, M, Gort, E, Beukema, J.C, Spijkerman-Bergsma, M.J, Both, S, Langendijk, J.A, Matysiak, W.P, Brouwer, C.L, Baba, K, Numajiri, H, Murofushi, K, Oshiro, Y, Mizumoto, M, Onishi, K, Nonaka, T, Ishikawa, H, Okumura, T, Dominietto, M, Adam, K, Ahlhelm, F.J, Safai, S, Abdul-Jabbar, L, Song, J, Tseng, Y. D, Rockhill, J, Fink, J, Chang, L, Halasz, L. M, Guntrum, F, Steinmeier, T, Nagaraja, S, Jazmati, D, Geismar, D, Timmermann, B, Plaude, S, Lynch, C, Petras, K, Chang, J, Grimm, S, Lukas, R, Kumthekar, P, Merrell, R, Kalapurakal, J, Gross, J, Hoppe, B, Simone, C, Nichols, R.C, Pham, D, Mohindra, P, Chon, B, Morris, C, Li, Z, Flampouri, S, Powell, J.R, Murray, L, Burnet, N, Fernandez, S, Lingard, Z, McParland, L, O’Hara, D, Whitfield, G, Short, S.C, Guan, X, Gao, J, Hu, W, Yang, J, Xing, X, Hu, C, Kong, L, Zou, Z, Thomas, H, Sasidharan, B.K, Rengan, R, Zeng, J, Busold, S, Heese, J, Cerello, P, Bottura, L, Felcini, E, Ferrero, V, Monaco, V, Pennazio, F, de Rijk, G, Chang, H, KyungDon, C, Byunghun, H, Gyuseong, C, Chilukuri, S, Jalali, R, Panda, P.K, Korn, G, Larosa, G, Russo, A, Schillaci, F, Scuderi, V, Margarone, D, Fredén, E, Almhagen, E, Mejaddam, Y, Siegbahn, A, Guardiola, C, Gómez, F, Prieto-Pena, J, Fleta, C, De Marzi, L, Prezado, Y, Kabolizadeh, P, Reitemeier, P, Navin, M, Hamstra, D, Anderson, J, Stevens, C, Bartolucci, L, Adrien, C, Lejars, M, Vaillant, M, Fourquet, A, Robillard, M, Costa, E, Kirova, Y, Kolano, A.M, Degiovanni, A, Farr, J.B, Kundel, S, Pinto, M, Kurichiyanil, N, Würl, M, Englbrecht, F, Hillbrand, M, Schreiber, J, Parodi, K, Kurup, A, Magliari, A, Perez, J, Masui, S, Asano, T, Owen, H, Burt, G, Apsimon, R, Pitman, S, Popovici, M.A, Vasilache, R, Safavi-Naeini, M, Chacon, A, Howell, N, Middleton, R.J, Fraser, B, Guatelli, S, Rendina, L, Matsufuji, N, Gregoire, M.C, Sikora, K, Pettingell, J, Crocker, M, Saplaouras, A, Snijders, A, Mao, J.H, Nakamura, K, Bin, J, Gonsalves, A, Mao, H.S, Steinke, S, Roach, M, Leemans, W, Blakely, E, Takayama, K, Tan, T.S, Wee, J.T.S, Tuan, J.K.L, Wang, M.L.C, Quah, J.S.H, Tay, N.C.W, Lee, J.C.L, Lim, J.K.H, Oei, A.A, Tan, J.M, Park, S.Y, Chow, W.W.L, Omar, Y.B, Chew, P.G, Taylor, P, Lee, J, Tsurudome, T, Hirabayashi, M, Tsutsui, H, Yoshida, J, Takahashi, N, Kamiguchi, N, Hashimoto, A, Tachikawa, T, Mikami, Y, Kumata, Y, Wang, M, Chua, E.T, Wee, J, Wong, F.Y, Tuan, J, Master, Z, Wong, S, Welsh, J, Hentz, C, Pankuch, M, DeJongh, F, Xia, Y, Aitkenhead, A.H, Appleby, R, Merchant, M.J, MacKay, R.I, Young, H, Hughes, V, Alsulimane, M, Barajas, C.A, Taylor, J, Casse, G, Omar, A, Burdin, S, Boon, C, Lester, J, Thomas, A.J, Khan, A, Huthart, L, Leaver, K, Snell, J, Warlow, A, Burigo, L.N, Oborn, B, Belosi, F, Fredh, A, van de Water, S, Schneider, T, Patriarca, A, Bergs, J, Hierso, E, Hirayama, R, Martínez-Rovira, I, Seksek, O, Shirato, H, Nakamura, T, Ogino, T, Akimoto, T, Tamamura, H, Nishimoto, N, Proton-Net, G, Shimizu, S, Fabiano, S, Bangert, M, Guckenberger, M, Unkelbach, J, Mcauley, G, Teran, A, Slater, J, Wroe, A, Boon, I, Clorley, J, Owen, K, Oliver, T, Cicchetti, A, Ballarini, F, Rancati, T, Carrara, M, Zaffaroni, N, Bezawy, R. El, Carante, M, Valdagni, R, Faccini, R, Forte, G.I, Dhinsey, S, Greenshaw, T, Parsons, J, Welsch, C, Stock, M, Grevillot, L, Kragl, G, Carlino, A, Martino, G, Hug, E, Arya, H, Chirayath, V.A, Jin, M, Weiss, A.H, Glass, G.A, Chi, Y, Kaplan, L.P, Perez, R.A, Vestergaard, A, Gittings, E, Stamper, J, Beltran, C, Mark, P, Furutani, K, McAuley, G, Gordon, J, Boisseau, P, Dart, A, Nett, W, Kollipara, S, Grossmann, M, Actis, O, Diete, W, Rudolf, D, Klein, H.U, Kramert, R, Meer, D, Venkataraman, C, Waterstradt, T, Hérault, J, Bergerot, J.M, Hsi, W.C, Zhou, R, Zhang, X, Yang, F, Yinxiangzi, S, Sun, J, Li, X, Zhiling, C, Yuehu, P, Mengya, G, Haiyun, K, Qi, L, Zhentang, Z, Lin, Y.H, Tan, H.Q, Tan, L.K.R, Ang, K.W, Xiufang, L, Milkowski, K, Pang, D, Jones, M, Mizota, M, Tsunashima, Y, Himukai, T, Ogata, R, Uno, T, Ouyang, L, Jia, B, Li, D, Paul, K, Pullia, M, Savazzi, S, Lante, V, Foglio, S, Donetti, M, Falbo, L, Casalegno, L, Rousseau, M, Shinomiya, K, Yazawa, T, Iseki, Y, Kanai, Y, Hirata, Y, Powers, J, Solovev, A, Chernukha, A, Saburov, V, Shegai, P, Ivanov, S, Kaprin, A, Stolarczyk, L, Mojżeszek, N, Van Hoey, O, Farah, J, Domingo, C, Mares, V, Ploc, O, Trinkl, S, Harrison, R, Toltz, A, Nevitt, Z, Bloch, C, Taddei, P, Saini, J, Regmi, R, Yuntao, S, Jinxing, Z, Yap, J.S.L, Hentz, M, Silverman, J, Jolly, S, Boogert, S, Nevay, L, Kacperek, A, Schnuerer, R, Resta-Lopez, J, Zeng, X, Zheng, J, Li, M, Han, M, Song, Y, Holm, A, Korreman, S, Petersen, J.B.B, Bäumer, C, Fuenstes, C, Janson, M, Matic, A, Wulff, J, Psoroulas, S, Lomax, T, Arjomandy, B, Athar, B, Tesfamicael, B, Bejarano Buele, A, Deemer, J, Kozlyuk, V, VanSickle, K, Bolt, R, van Goethem, M.J, Langendijk, J, van t Veld, A, Chen, K.L, Wlodarczyk, B, Wu, H, Chen, Z, Shen, L, Fachouri, N, Placidi, L, Böhlen, T, Ieko, Y, Iwai, T, Nemoto, K, Suzuki, K, Kanai, T, Miyasaka, Y, Harada, M, Yamashita, H, Kubota, I, Kayama, T, Jensen, M.F, Bræmer-Jensen, P, Randers, P, Søndergaard, C.S, Nørrevang, O, Taasti, V.T, Kong, H, Yin, C, Gu, M, Liu, M, Shu, H, Chongxian, Y, Haiyang, Z, Juan, Z, Ming, L, Manzhou, Z., Liying, Z, Kecheng, C, Xiaolei, D, Castro, J, Freire, J, Cremades, M, Moral, L, Rico, P, Ares, C, Miralbell, R, Shi, J, Xia, J, Wang, B, Li, Q, Liu, X, Sung, C.C, Chen, W.P, Liao, T.Y, Takashina, M, Hamatani, N, Tsubouchi, T, Yagi, M, Mizoe, J, Titt, U, Mirkovic, D, Yepes, P, Wang, Q, Grosshans, D, Wieser, H.P, Mohan, R, Vadrucci, M, Xiao, G, Cai, X, Li, G, Yuan, Y, Lu, R, Sun, G, Zhang, M, Deming, L, lianhua, O, Takada, K, Tanaka, S, Matsumoto, Y, Naito, F, Kurihara, T, Nakai, K, Matsumura, A, Sakae, T, Shamurailatpam, D, P, K, Mp, N, A, M, Kg, G, T, R, C, S, J, R, Rozes, A, Dutheil, P, Batalla, A, Vela, A, Rana, S, Bennouna, J, Gutierrez, A, He, P, Shen, G, Dai, Z, Ma, Y, Chen, W, Pandey, J, Chirvase, C, Osborne, M, Ilsley, E, Di Biase, I, Kato, T, Hirose, K, Arai, K, Motoyanagi, T, Harada, T, Takeuchi, A, Kato, R, Tanaka, H, Mitsumoto, T, Takai, Y, Bolsa-Ferruz, M, Palmans, H, Chen, Y.S, Wu, S.W, Huang, H.C, Wang, H.T, Yeh, C.Y, Chen, H.H, Cook, H, Lourenço, A, Dal Bello, R, Magalhaes Martins, P, Hermann, G, Kihm, T, Seimetz, M, Brons, S, Seco, J, De Saint-Hubert, M, Swakon, J, De Freitas Nascimento, L, Tessaro, V.B, Poignant, F, Gervais, B, Beuve, M, Galassi, M.E, Harms, J, Chang, C.W, Zhang, R, Lin, Y, Langen, K, Liu, T, Lin, L, Howard, M, Denbeigh, J, Remmes, N, Debrot, E, Herman, M, Huang, Y.Y, Tsai, S.H, Fang, F.M, Mizuno, H, Sagara, T, Yamazaki, Y, Kato, M, Oyama, S, Pembroke, C, Joslin-Tan, T, Maggs, R, O’Neil, K, Barrett-Lee, P, Staffurth, J, Resch, A, Heyes, P, Georg, D, Fuchs, H, Hideyuki, M, katsuhisa, N, Wataru, Y, Samnøy, A.T, Ytre-Hauge, K.S, Povoli, M, Kok, A, Summanwar, A, Linh, T, Malinen, E, Röhrich, D, Asp, J, Santos, A, Afshar, V.S, Zhang, W.Q, Bezak, E, a, M, k, G, p, K, mp, N, t, R, c, S, j, R, Smith, B, Hammer, C, Hyer, D, DeWerd, L, Culberson, W, Brooke, M, Straticiuc, M, Craciun, L, Matei, C.E, Radu, M, Xiao, M, Paschalis, S, Joshi, P, Price, T, Mehta, M, Graça, J, Biglin, E, Aitkenhead, A, Price, G, Williams, K, Chadwick, A, Schettino, G, Robinson, A, Kirkby, K, Catanzano, D, Cessac, R, Rutherford, R, Ahmed, A, Mohammadi, A, Tashima, H, Yamaya, T, Chavez Barajas, C, Taylor, A, Vossebeld, J, Barwick, I, CHEON, W, Jo, K, Ahn, S.W, Cho, J, Han, Y, Choi, H.H.F, Cheung, C.W, Cohilis, M, Lee, J.A, Sterpin, E, Souris, K, Mundy, D, Petasecca, M, Rosenfeld, A.B, Boso, A, Di Fulvio, A, Becchetti, F.D, Torres-Isea, R.O, Febbraro, M, Gagnon-Moisan, F, Feng, Y, Fontana, M, Etxebeste, A, Dauvergne, D, Letang, J.M, Testa, E, Sarrut, D, Maxim, V, Gajewski, J, Durante, M, Garbacz, M, Krah, N, Krzempek, K, Schiavi, A, Skrzypek, A, Tommasino, F, Ruciński, A, Gillin, M, Sahoo, N, Zhu, X.R, Van Delinder, K.W, Crawford, D, Khan, R, Gräfe, J, Kakiuchi, G, Shioyama, Y, Shimokomaki, R, Huang, Z, Wang, W, Sheng, Y, Lee, M.W, Jan, M.L, Hong, J.H, Okamoto, K, Sato, H, Kalantan, S, Boston, A, Kang, Y, Shen, J, Casey, W, Vern-Gross, T, Wong, W, McGee, L, Halyard, M, Keole, S, Kelleter, L, Radogna, R, Saakyan, R, Basharina-Freshville, A, Attree, D, Volz, L, Komenda, W, Krzempek, D, Mierzwińska, G, Barbara, M, Kopeć, R, Lan, J.H, Chang, F.X, Lin, C.H, Lee, T.F, Ahn, S, Cheon, W, Lee, M, Letellier, V, Osorio, J, Dreindl, R, Livingstone, J, Gallin-Martel, M.L, Létang, J.M, Marcatili, S, Morel, C, Maggi, P, Chen, H, Yang, H, Panthi, R, Mackin, D, Peterson, S, Beddar, S, Polf, J, Masuda, T, Nishio, T, Sano, A, Tomozawa, H, Nishio, A, Tsuneda, M, Okamoto, T, Karasawa, K, Miszczynska Giza, O, Sánchez-Parcerisa, D, Herraiz, J. L, Rojo-Santiago, J, Udias, J.M, Mitrović, U, Hager, M, List, I, Fischer, C, Cecowski, M, Gajšek, R, Mizutani, S, Hotta, K, Baba, H, Tanizaki, N, Yamaguchi, T, Moon, S.Y, Rah, J.E, Yoon, M, Shin, D, Nebah, P, Dugas, J, Syh, J, Maynard, M, Marsh, N, Rosen, L, Nichiporov, D, Watts, D.A, Chen, Y, Petterson, M, Lee, W.D, Penfold, S.N, Ruebel, N, Piersimoni, P, Mille, M, Mossahebi, S, Chen-Mayer, H, Allport, P, Green, S, Shaikh, S, Walker, D, Qamhiyeh, S, Levegruen, S, Kutscher, S, Kranke, H, Olbrich, G, Stuschke, M, Baran, J, Pawlik-Niedzwiecka, M, Moskal, P, Rutherford, H, Poenisch, F, Martin, C, Wu, R, Mayo, L.L, Shah, S.J, Frank, S.J, Gunn, G.B, Sakurai, Y, Takata, T, Kondo, N, Schlegel, N, Deng, Y, Sun, W, Wu, X, Yap, J, Zhang, H, Szumlak, T, Schuy, C, Simeonov, Y, Zink, K, Graeff, C, Weber, U, Allred, B, Robertson, D, Dewees, T, Gagneur, J, Stoker, J, Stützer, K, Valentini, C, Agolli, L, Hölscher, T, Thiele, J, Dutz, A, Löck, S, Krause, M, Baumann, M, Richter, C, Takayanagi, T, Uesaka, T, Nakamura, Y, Unlu, M.B, Kuriyama, Y, Uesugi, T, Ishi, Y, Umegaki, K, Matsuura, T, Watts, D. A, Huisman, B, Valladolid Onecha, V, Fraile, L.M, Sanchez Parcerisa, D, España, S, Ze, W, Chen, H.Y, Chuang, K.S, Wilson, M, Lui, J, Noble, D, Holloway, S, Yap, J.H.H, Chew, M.M.L, Pang, P.P, Lim, C.J.C, Gan, S.A, Tan, T.W.K, Shen, Z.M, Moyers, M, Qianxia, W, Chen, H.L, Li, J, Lin, J, Zhao, L, Myers, W, Ates, O, Faught, J, Yan, Y, Faught, A, Sobczak, D, Hua, C.H, Moskvin, V, Merchant, T, Henkner, K, Ecker, S, Chaudhri, N, Ellerbrock, M, Jäkel, O, Hernandez Morales, D, Augustine, K, Johnson, J, Younkin, J, Fiorina, E, Mattei, I, Morrocchi, M, Sarti, A, Traini, G, Valle, S.M, Bert, C, Karger, C.P, Kamada, T, Scholz, M, DeLuca, P.M, De Simoni, M, Dong, Y, Embriaco, A, Fischetti, M, Mancini-Terracciano, C, Mirabelli, R, Muraro, S, Lens, E, de Blécourt, A, Schaart, D, Vos, F, van Dongen, K, Berthold, J, Khamfongkhruea, C, Petzoldt, J, Wohlfahrt, P, Pausch, G, Janssens, G, Smeets, J, Shamblin, J, Blakey, M, Moore, R, Matteo, J, Schreuder, N, Derenchuk, V, Shin, J, Jee, K.W, Clasie, B.M, Depauw, N, Batin, E, Madden, T.M, Schuemann, J, Paganetti, H, Kooy, H.M, Daniel, M, Abbassi, L, Arsène-Henry, A, Amessis, M, Maes, S, O’Ryan-Blair, A, Laval, G, Ermoian, R, Taddei, P. J, Andersson, K, Norrlid, O, Lindbäck, E, Vallhagen Dahlgren, C, Witt Nyström, P, Argota Perez, R, Sharma, M.B, Elstrøm, U.V, Bizzocchi, N, Albertini, F, Branco, D, Kry, S, Rong, J, Frank, S, Followill, D, Busch, K, Muren, L.P, Thörnqvist, S, Andersen, A.G, Pedersen, J, Dong, L, Cao, W, Bai, X, Van Lobenstein, N, Traneus, E, Anson, C, Comi, S, Marvaso, G, Russo, S, Giandini, T, Avuzzi, B, Ciardo, D, Cattani, F, Jereczek-Fossa, B, Cotterill, J, Esposito, M, Winter, A, Allinson, N, Liu, G, Yan, D, Jawad, S, Dilworth, J, Chen, P, Ackermann, B, Florijn, M, Sharfo, A.W.M, Wiggenraad, R.G.J, van Santvoort, J.P.C, Petoukhova, A.L, Hoogeman, M.S, Mast, M.E, Dirkx, M.L.P, Fujitaka, S, Fujii, Y, Nihongi, H, Nakayama, S, Ho, M.W, Artz, M, Tong, K.T.A, Hytonen, R, Koponen, T, Niemela, P, Iancu, G, Lautenschlaeger, S, Eberle, F, Horst, F, Ringbaek, T, Engenhart-Cabillic, R, Kim, M.J, Hong, C.S, Kim, Y.B, Park, S.H, Kim, J.S, Reiterer, J, Steffal, C, Gora, J, Kann, T, Schratter-Sehn, A.U, Li, H, Chen, M, wu, R, Li, Y, zhang, X, Gautam, A, poenisch, F, sahoo, N, Zhu, R, Lin, M, Chang, J.T.C, Maeda, Y, Sato, Y, Shibata, S, Bou, S, Yamamoto, K, Sasaki, M, Fuwa, N, Takamatsu, S, Kume, K, Lim, F, Faller, F, Stiller, W, Ming, X, Hui, H, Mukawa, T, Takashi, Y, Stephenson, L, Pang, E.P.P, Paz, A.E, Yoshida, Y, Righetto, R, Vecchi, C, Alparone, A, De Spirito, M, Radhakrishnan, S, Chandrashekaran, A, Nandigam, J, Sarma, Y, Rechner, L, Munck af Rosenschöld, P, Bäck, A, Johansen, T.S, Schut, D.A, Aznar, M.C, Nyman, J, Ren, X, Rosas, S, Vanderstraeten, R, Jyske, T, Jari, L, Yuenan, W, Henthorn, N, Warmenhoven, J, Merchant, M, Kirkby, N, Ranald, M, Stefanowicz, S, Zschaeck, S, Troost, E.G.C, Stubington, E, Ehrgott, M, Nohadani, O, Shentall, G, Sun, T, yin, Y, Lin, X, Yoshimura, T, Matsuo, Y, Yamazaki, R, Takao, S, Miyamoto, N, Toussaint, L, Indelicato, D.J, Lassen-Ramshad, Y, Kirby, K, Mikkelsen, R, Di Pinto, M, Høyer, M, Stokkevåg, C.H, Van Herk, M, Shortall, J, Green, A, Vasquez Osorio, E, Mackay, R, Navratil, M, Andrlik, M, Chiang, Y.Y, Yeh, Y.H, Yeh, Y.J, Chang, T.C, Eaton, B, Yang, X, Esiashvili, N, Gu, W, Ruan, D, O’Connor, D, Zou, W, Tsai, M.Y, Jia, X, Sheng, K, Hyde, C, Chen, P.Y, Deraniyagala, R, Petoukhova, A, Klaassen, L, Habraken, S, Jacobs, J, Sattler, M, Verhoeven, K, Klaver, Y, Widesott, L, Fracchiolla, F, Algranati, C, Scifoni, E, Scartoni, D, Farace, P, Kröniger, K, Bauer, J, Nilsson, R, Chen, X, Liu, R, Sun, B, Mutic, S, Zhang, T, Zhao, T, Kajdrowicz, T, Wochnik, A, Swakoń, J, Małecki, K, Michalec, B, Moffitt, G, Wootton, L, Hardemark, B, Sandison, G, Emery, R, Stewart, R, Reidel, C.A, Finck, C, Deisher, A, Mahajan, A, Michael, H, Ahn, S.H, Kwang Hyeon, K, Chankyu, K, Youngmoon, G, Shinhaeng, C, Se Byeong, L, Young Kyung, L, Haksoo, K, Dongho, S, Jong Hwi, J, Ali, Y, Monini, C, Maigne, L, Alshaikhi, J, D’Souza, D, Amos, R. A, Baumann, K.S, Gomà, C, Flatten, V, Lautenschläger, S, Abdel-Rehim, A, Wan Chan Tseung, H.S, Ma, J, Kamal Syed, H, Boscolo, D, Krämer, M, Fuss, M, Braunroth, T, Rabus, H, Baek, W.Y, Brown, H, Alshammari, H, Brownstein, J, Giantsoudi, D, Wang, C.C, Grassberger, C, Chen, C, Chan, M.F, Mah, D, Hojo, Y, Xu, C, Elia, A, Fung, A, Nguyen, B.N, Oyervides, M, Koska, B, Kamal Sayed, H, Kim, C, Kim, Y.J, Lee, S.B, Goh, Y, Cho, S, Jeong, J.H, Kim, H, Lim, Y.K, Koh, W.Y.C, Lew, W.S, Lee, C.L.J, Kollitz, E, Han, H, Kim, C.H, Kroll, C, Riboldi, M, Newhauser, W, Dedes, G, Fuglsang Jensen, M, Nyström, U.H, Skyt, P.S, Hoffmann, L, Sloth Møller, D, Dokic, I, Kuo, S.H, Tai, P.L, Cheng, S.W, Chong, N.S, Yeom, Y.S, Kuzmin, G, Griffin, K, Langner, U, Jung, J.W, Lee, C, Lee, C.C, Hsu, W, Chao, T.C, Liamsuwan, T, Pischom, N, Tangboonduangjit, P, Suchada, T, Zheng, D, Rutenberg, M, Dhabaan, A, Harrabi, S, MARAFINI, M, Gioscio, E, Yunsheng, D, Alphonse, G, Rodriguez Lafrasse, C, Testa, É, Morris, B, Asavaphatiboon, S, DeBlois, D, Yam, M, Sękowski, P, Skwira-Chalot, I, Matulewicz, T, Flynn, R, Verbeek, N, Smyczek, S, Brualla, L, Lei, Y, Ghavidel, B, Curran, W, Beitler, J, Yu, H.W, Jeng, S.C, Tsai, Y.C, Chiou, J.F, Yusa, K, Dai, T, Yuan, P, Shafai-Erfani, G, Shu, H.K, Pepin, M, Tryggestad, E.J, Abdel Rehim, A, Johnson, J.E, Herman, M.G, Lee, S.C, Sheu, R.J, Ödén, J, Ramos-Mendez, J, Perl, J, Faddegon, B, Alaka, B.G, Bentefour, E.H, Samuel, D, Biradar, B, Frusti, P, Den Otter, L.A, Kurz, C, Stanislawski, M, Landry, G, Meijers, A, Knopf, A.C, Dickmann, J, Wesp, P, Rit, S, Johnson, R.P, Bashkirov, V, Schulte, R.W, Hoyle, B, Johnson, R, Schulte, R, Weller, J, Cotterill, J.V, Waltham, C, Allport, P.P, Taylor, M, Rogers, J, Evans, P.M, Allinson, N.M, Henry, T, Ardenfors, O, Gudowska, I, Poludniowski, G, Dasu, A, Lai, Y, Yuncheng, Z, Yiping, S, Mingwu, J, Xun, J, Yujie, C, Meric, I, Mattingly, J, Moustafa, A, Skjerdal, K, Moteabbed, M, Harisinghani, M, Efstathiou, J.A, Lu, H.M, Kabuki, S, Mizowaki, T, Ofierzynski, R, Paysan, P, Strzelecki, A, Lucca, R, Patch, S, Mustapha, B, Santiago-Gonzalez, D, Pettersen, H.E.S, Sølie, J, Levegrün, S, Pöttgen, C, Meyer, E, Collins-Fekete, C.A, Bashkirov, V.A, Wang, Y.M, Sung, K.C, Wang, C.J, Wu, H.Y, Winter, M, Bauer, U, Hansmann, T, Naumann, J, Peters, A, Pilz, K, Troost, E, Yan, S, Greenhalgh, J, Li, S, Bortfeld, T, Flanz, J, Ytre-Hauge, K, Zhang, L, Sharp, G.C, Cascio, E.W, Flanz, J.B, Tang, J, Zhu, J, Zhang, J, Uh, J, Sarosiek, C, Ricci, J, Coutrakon, G, Ozoemelam, I, van der Graaf, E.R, Maciej, K, Zhang, N, Brandenburg, S, Dendooven, P, Niepel, K, Yohannes, I, Dietrich, O, Ertl-Wagner, B, Pappas, E, Sølie, J.R, Odland, O.H, Ghesquiere-Dierickx, L.M.H, Felix Bautista, R, Gehrke, T, Jakubek, J, Turecek, D, Martisikova, M, Malekzadeh, E, Rajabi, H, Kalantari Mahmoudabadi, F, Meschini, G, d’Arenzo, D, Comini, D, Huynh, M.T, Paganelli, C, Fontana, G, Mancin, A, Preda, L, Su, Z, Henderson, R, Nichols, C, Bryant, C, Mendenhall, W, Boyer, B, Geerebaert, Y, Gevin, O, Koumeir, C, Magniette, F, Manigot, P, Poirier, F, Servagent, N, Thiebaux, C, Verderi, M, Chen, Y.R, Anderle, K, Jeraj, R, Chuter, R, Allan, I, Patel, I, MacKay, R, Harrison, K, Hoole, A, Thomas, S, Jena, R, Liao, Z, Zhu, R.X, Freeman, M, Espy, M, Aulwes, E, Magnelind, P, Merrill, F, Neukirch, L, Sidebottom, R, Tang, Z, Tupa, D, Wilde, C, Shusharina, N, Fullerton, B, Adams, J, Sharp, G, Chan, A, Dolde, K, Naumann, P, Dávid, C, Kachelrieß, M, Saito, N, Pfaffenberger, A, Wolf, M, Lis, M, Moreau, J, Buttion, M, Molitoris, J.K, Simone-, C.B, Regele, H, Bula, C, Danuser, S, Kang, M, Lin, H, Ribeiro, C. O, Dumont, D, Terpstra, J, Knopf, A, Wagenaar, D, Kierkels, R, van der Schaaf, A, Scandurra, D, Sijtsema, M, Korevaar, E, van den Hoek, A, O’Neil, M, Chung, H, Sala, I, Ramirez, H, Guerrero, T, Mondlane, G, Butkus, M.B, Stewart, R.D, Carlson, D.J, Ingram, S, Ytre-Hauge, K. Smeland, Rørvik, E, Perales, A, Carabe, A, Baratto-Roldan, A, Kimstrand, P, Cortes-Giraldo, M, Bertolet, A, Barato-Roldan, A, Baiocco, G, Barbieri, S, Mei, Z, Fan, K, Tang, K, Wang, J, Zhu, H, Sung, W, McNamara, A, Tran, L.T, Qi, Y, Xu, X, Pei, X, Chiang, Y, Chien-Hau, C, Chung-Chi, L, Chuan-Jong, T, Tsi-Chian, C, Wang, L, Cao, J, Wang, X, Lin, E, Minami, K, Kondo, R, Khoei, S, Shirvalilou, S, Khoee, S, Jamali Raoufi, N, Karimi, M.R, Shakeri-Zadeh, A, Patera, V, Rinaldi, I, Sas-Korczynska, B, Deng, W, Karagounis, I, Huynh, K, Maity, A, Abel, E, Santa Cruz, G, Monti Hughes, A, Herrera, M, Trivillin, V, Portu, A, Garabalino, M, Schwint, A, Gonzalez, S, Saint Martin, G, Santa Cruz, I, Tamari, Y, Watanabe, T, Masunaga, S.I, Wittig, A, Nigg, D, Stecher-Rasmussen, F, Moss, R, Igawa, K, Akita, K, Akabori, K, Hattori, K.J, Arima, H, Motoyama, K, Higashi, T, Trivillin, V.A, Pozzi, E.C.C, Thorp1, S.I, Curotto1, P, Garabalino1, M.A, Itoiz, M.E, Santa Cruz, I.S, Ramos, P.S, Palmieri, M.A, Schwint, A.E, Gadan, M.A, Thorp, S.I, Curotto, P, Portu, A.M, Thorp, S, Trivillin, V. A, Schwint, A. E, Fukuo, Y, Kanemitsu, T, Fukumura, M, Kosaka, T, Hiramatsu, R, Kuroiwa, T, Miyatake, S, Kawabata, S, Kirihata, M, Goldfinger, J.A, Garabalino, M.A, Pozzi, E.C, Ramos, P, De Leo, L.N, Yu, Q, Engelbrecht, M, Sioen, S, Miles, X, Nair, S, Ndimba, R, Baeyens, A, Vandevoorde, C, Buizza, G, Meng, J, Takai, N, Ogami, M, Nakamura, S, Ohba, Y, Liu, R.F, Zhang, Q.N, Wang, X.H, Luo, H.T, Kong, Y.R, Jansen, J, Tirinato, L, Marafioti, M.G, Hanley, R, Yao, X.Q, Pagliari, F, Huang, C.Y, Wong, W.K.R, Ho, Y.W, Nam, P.H, Koryakin, S.N, Troshina, M.V, Koryakina, E.V, Potetnya, V.I, Baykuzina, R.M, Lychagin, A.A, Ulyanenko, S.E, Molinelli, S, Giuseppe, M, Tran, L, Bolst, D, James, B, Steinsberger, T, Alliger, C, Dahle, T.J, Rusten, E, Wright, P, Forsback, S, Silvoniemi, A, Minn, H, Andersson, S, Buti, G, Barragán Montero, A.M, Vasquez-Osario, E, Sabouri, P, Nkenge, K, Yi, B, Burigo, L, Greilich, S, Thomas, R, Clark, C, Lourenco, A, Oancea, C, Granja, C, Kodaira, S, Coplan, M, Graybill, J, Lutz, L, Shahi, C, Su, J.J, Thompson, A, Romano, F, Shipley, D, Hong, T.S, Labarbe, R, Wolfgang, J.A, Meyer, S, Bortfeldt, J, Lämmer, P, Schnürle, K, Peters, N, Möhler, C, Hofmann, C, Koschik, A, Bryce-Atkinson, A, Van Nugteren, J, De Rijk, G, Kirby, G, Dutoit, B, Vignati, A, Ahmadi Ganjeh, Z, Fausti, F, Giordanengo, S, Hammad Ali, O, Sacchi, R, Shakarami, Z, Cirio, R, Inoue, J, Tachibana, M, Shimizu, Y, Ochi, T, Amano, D, Miyashita, T, Cooley, J, Nyamane, S, Zwart, T, Wagner, M, Lu, M, Rosenthal, S, Hashimoto, T, Katoh, N, Tamura, H, Emert, F, Missimer, J, Eichenberger, P, Gmuer, C, Spengler, C, Kamp, F, Hofmaier, J, Reiner, M, Belka, C, Van Ooteghem, G, Dasnoy-Sumell, D, Geets, X, Chen, C.C, Galbreath, G, Shmulenson, R, Pinheiro de Almeida, I, van Elmpt, W, Vilches Freixas, G, Unipan, M, Verhaegen, F, Bosmans, G, Garcia, G, Cevallos Robalino, L, Guzman-Garcia, K, Vega-Carrillo, H.R, Gomez-Ros, J.M, Gallego, E, Hintenlang, K, Martin, M, Gupta, N, Meissner, J, Smathers, J, Ainsley, C, Yin, L, Jagt, T, Breedveld, S, van Haveren, R, Nout, R, Astreinidou, E, Staring, M, Heijmen, B, Hoogeman, M, Stokes, W, Matter, M, Nenoff, L, Toramatsu, C, Wakizaka, H, Nitta, M, Nishikido, F, Hirano, Y, Yoshida, E, Miller, J, Maris, A, Kalle, R, Franco, G, Kierkels, R.G.J, van den Hoek, J.G.M, Bijl, H.P, Dieters, M, Steenbakkers, R.J.H.M, Dejongh, F, DeJongh, E, Rykalin, V, Karonis, N, Ordonez, C, Duffin, K, Winans, J, Neph, R, Sanchez-Parcerisa, D, Lopez-Aguirre, M, Dolcet Llerena, A, Udias, J, Oxley, D, Besson, R, Meier, G, Nanz, A, Schorta, M, Fleury, E, Trnková, P, Erdal, E, Hassan, K, Beenakker, J.W, Pignol, J.P, Matysiak, W, Tian, L, Zepter, S, Winterhalter, C, Shim, S, Gouldstone, C, Trnkova, P, Vatnitsky, S, Liu, K, Li, E, Zhuangming, S, Lowenstein, J, De Wilde, O, Bossier, V, Lerot, X, Pouppez, A, Xx, X, Verburg, J, Hueso-Gonzalez, F, Ruggieri, T, Amato, C, Ghesquiere-Dierickx, L, Felix-Bautista, R, Deville, C, Barsky, A, Vapiwala, N, Mohamad, O, Tabuchi, T, Nitta, Y, Nomoto, A, Kasuya, G, Choy, H, Miyashiro, I, Bush, D, Chuong, M, Kozarek, J, Rubens, M, Larson, G, Vargas, C, Hung, S.P, Hsieh, C.E, Huang, B.S, Tsang, N.M, Smith, N, Viehman, J, Harmsen, W, Elswick, S, Boughey, J, Harless, C, Jimenez, R, Hickey, S, DePauw, N, Ho, A, Taghian, A, MacDonald, S, Meek, A, Hedrick, S, Baliga, S, Gallotto, S, Lewy, J, Patteson, B, Speroni, S, Omsberg, A, Tarbell, N, Musolino, P, Yock, T, Indelicato, D, Rotondo, R, Mailhot, R, Uezono, H, Bradfield, S, Agarwal, V, Gillies, C, Gosling, A, Casares-Magaz, O, Eskildsen, S.F, Lassen, Y, Hasle, H, Tofting-Olesen, K, Alapetite, C, Puget, S, Nauraye, C, Beccaria, K, Bolle, S, Doz, F, Sainte-Rose, C, Bouffet, E, Zerah, M, Wu, J, Qiu, X, Hua, W, Mao, Y, Frakulli, R, Kramer, P.H, Glas, M, Blase, C, Tippelt, S, Konrath, L, Gruber, N, Schallerbauer-Peter, A, Mock, U, Niyazi, M, Niemierko, A, Schapira, E, Kim, V, Oh, K.S, Hwang, W.L, Busse, P.M, Loeffler, J.S, Shih, H.A, Appel, H, Tseng, Y.D, Tsai, H, Sinesi, C, Rossi, C, Badiyan, S, Kotecha, R, Pike, L, Horick, N, Yeap, B, Franck, K, Wang, I, Loeffler, J, McKenna, M, Shih, H, Kountouri, M, Kole, A.J, Murray, F.R, Kliebsch, U, Combescure, C, iannalfi, A, Riva, G, Dougherty, J, Kruse, J, Iott, M, Brown, P, Olivier, K, Brodin, P, Kabarriti, R, Schechter, C, Kalnicki, S, Garg, M, Tomé, W, Lu, J.J, Chen, P.J, Dhanireddy, B, Severo, C, Lee, C.H, Lin, C.R, Rosier, L, Mathis, T, DeLaney, T, Lin, S, O’Meara, E, Powell, T, Hong, T, Hall, D, Liu, A, Ntentas, G, Dedeckova, K, Darby, S, Cutter, D, Zapletalova, S, Chen, Y.L, Miao, R, Lee, H, Hsiao-Ming, L, Choy, E, Cote, G, Eulitz, J, Lutz, B, Enghardt, W, Lühr, A, Mcmahon, S, Prise, K, Sung Hyun, L, Tansho, R, Mizushima, K, Warmenhoven, J.W, Hufnagl, A, Friedrich, T, Deycmar, S, Gruber, S, Dörr, W, Pruschy, M, Waissi, W, Burckel, H, Nicol, A, Noel, G, Yousef, I, Koizumi, M, Santa Cruz, G.A, González, S.J, Longhino, J, Provenzano, L, Oña, P, Rao, M, Cantarelli, M.D.L.Á, Leiras, A, Olivera, M.S, Alessandrini, P, Brollo, F, Boggio, E, Costa, H, Ventimiglia, R, Binia, S, Nievas, S.I, Langle, Y, Eijan, A.M, Colombo, L.L, Kawai, K, Nakamura, H, Natsuko, K, Masaki, H, Nakada, M, Furuse, M, Miyatake, S.I, Koivunoro, H, Kankaanranta, L, González, S, Joensuu, H, Sokol, O, Hild, S, Wiedemann, J, Köthe, A, Perry, D, Batie, M, Mascia, A, Sertorio, M, Luhr, A, Suckert, T, Müller, J, Beyreuther, E, Gotz, M, Haase, R, Schürer, M, Tillner, F, von Neubeck, C, Davis, A, Sishc, B, Saha, J, Ding, L, Story, M, Wagner, S, Kim, S.Y, Geary, S, Woodruff, T, Xu, T, Meng, Q, Gilchrist, S, Perentesis, J.P, Zheng, Y, Wells, S.I, Kong, Y, Liu, Y, Geng, Y, Knoll, M, Schwager, C, Schlegel, J, Schnölzer, M, Ding, L.H, Aroumougame, A, Chen, B, Saha, D, Pompos, A, Carter, R, Nickson, C, Thomson, J, Hill, M, Rodrigues, D, Snider, J, Sharma, A, Zakhary, M, Kara, L, Vujaskovic, Z, Dykstra, M, Best, T, Keane, F, Khandekar, M, Fintelmann, F, Willers, H, Singh, P, Eley, J, Malyapa, R, Mahmood, J, Hårdemark, B, Sandison, G.A, Wootton, L.S, Miyoaka, R.S, Laramore, G.E, Yang, P, van der Weide, H, Maduro, J, Heesters, M, Gawryszuk, A, Davila-Fajardo, R, Langendijk, H, Eckhard, M, Maxwell, A, VanNamen, K, Cashin, M, Jacovic, A, Dunn, M, kim, T, Jung, J, Kim, J, Swerdloff, S, Saunders, A, Thomas, J, Kidani, T, Okada, A, Tomida, K, Pennington, H, Xiaoqiang, L, Weigang, H, An, Q, Di, Y, Craig, S, Inga, G, Peyman, K, Xuanfeng, D, Cunningham, C, de Kock, M, Slabbert, J, Panaino, C.M, Phoenix, B, Regan, P.H, Shearman, R, Collins, S.M, Taylor, M.J, Grayson, M, Kato, K, Choi, H, Jang, J.W, Shin, W.G, Min, C.H, McMahon, S, Padilla Cabal, F, Fragoso, J.A, Resch, A.F, Katsis, A, Girdhani, S, Marshall, A, Jackson, I, Bentzen, S, Parry, R, Gantz, S, Schellhammer, S, Hoffmann, A, Delorme, R, Dos Santos, M, Salmon, R, Öden, J, Bullivant, K, Rucksdashal, R, Ferret, E, Covington, F, Rice, S, Decesaris, C, Siddiqui, O, Kowalski, E, Samanta, S, and Rothwell, B
- Subjects
Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon, Proton and Photons Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0642 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0180 ,Biology: Biology and Clinical InterfacePTC58-0685 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0385 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0546 ,Clinics: EyePTC58-0714 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon, Proton and Photons Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0528 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0507 ,Oral AbstractsPhysics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0661 ,Biology: Translational and Biomarkers Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0221 ,Oral AbstractsPhysics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0531 ,Oral AbstractsPhysics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0653 ,Biology: Drug and Immunotherapy CombinationsPTC58-0163 ,Clinics: Sarcoma - LymphomaPTC58-0055 ,Biology: Drug and Immunotherapy CombinationsPTC58-0166 ,Clinics: CNS / Skull BasePTC58-0198 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0421 ,Clinics: PediatricsPTC58-0560 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0709 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0664 ,Clinics: Eye / Breast / Pelvis Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0286 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0666 ,Biology: Translational and Biomarkers Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0346 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0547 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0308 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0549 ,Physics: Beam Delivery and Nozzle Design Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0111 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0050 ,Biology: Enhanced Biology in Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0587 ,Biology: Biology and Clinical InterfacePTC58-0454 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0052 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0395 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0534 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0072 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0533 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0538 ,Physics: Commissioning New Facilities Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0113 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0633 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0431 ,Physics: Beam Delivery and Nozzle DesignPTC58-0230 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling SimulationPTC58-0179 ,Clinics: Head and Neck / EyePTC58-0365 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0319 ,Biology: Translational and Biomarkers Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0697 ,Biology: Biology and Clinical InterfacePTC58-0663 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0240 ,Physics: Adaptive TherapyPTC58-0177 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0363 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0487 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0209 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0206 ,Clinics: CNS / Skull BasePTC58-0294 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0127 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling SimulationPTC58-0068 ,Physics: Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0062 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0692 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0723 ,Physics: Commissioning New Facilities Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0494 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0643 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0521 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0402 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0405 ,Clinics: Head and Neck / EyePTC58-0273 ,Clinics: GIPTC58-0397 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0648 ,Biology: Enhanced Biology in Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0489 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0617 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0616 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and Optimisation Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0668 ,Clinics: CNS / Skull BasePTC58-0188 ,Oral AbstractsPhysics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0625 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0654 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0655 ,Biology: Drug and Immunotherapy Combinations Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0133 ,Clinics: PediatricsPTC58-0313 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0659 ,Poster AbstractsClinics: CNSPTC58-0290 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0064 ,Physics: Adaptive TherapyPTC58-0396 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0281 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0427 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0669 ,General: New Horizons SessionPTC58-0191 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and Optimisation Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0217 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0303 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0665 ,Clinics: Sarcoma - LymphomaPTC58-0495 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0398 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0667 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0425 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0541 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0584 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0540 ,Biology: Drug and Immunotherapy Combinations Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0163 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0224 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0229 ,Clinics: PediatricsPTC58-0249 ,Physics: Beam Delivery and Nozzle Design Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0555 ,Clinics: PediatricPTC58-0463 ,Physics: Commissioning New Facilities Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0556 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0498 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0078 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0270 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0032 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0274 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0614 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0026 ,Clinics: Head and Neck / EyePTC58-0280 ,Clinics: Eye / Breast / Pelvis Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0091 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0593 ,Biology: Drug and Immunotherapy CombinationsPTC58-0012 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0025 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0146 ,Clinics: Sarcoma - LymphomaPTC58-0261 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0110 ,Clinics: Lung / Sarcoma / LymphomaPTC58-0733 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0554 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0597 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and Optimisation Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0330 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0115 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0598 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0040 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0282 ,Biology: Enhanced Biology in Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0399 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0283 ,Physics: Commissioning New Facilities Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0569 ,Clinics: GUPTC58-0647 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon, Proton and Photons Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0506 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0047 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0067 ,Clinics: GUPTC58-0409 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0065 ,Biology: BNCT Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0586 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative Dosimetry PTC58-0393 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0712 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0645 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0683 ,Biology: BNCT Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0107 ,Physics: Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0266 ,Physics: Monitoring and Modelling MotionPTC58-0530 ,Biology: BNCT Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0341 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0172 ,Physics: Commissioning New Facilities Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0456 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0170 ,Physics: Commissioning New Facilities Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0458 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0034 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0417 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0413 ,Physics: Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0492 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0168 ,Clinics: GI / Sarcoma Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0724 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0694 ,Physics: Adaptive TherapyPTC58-0005 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0696 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0453 ,Physics: Adaptive TherapyPTC58-0366 ,Clinics: BreastPTC58-0197 ,Physics: Beam Delivery and Nozzle DesignPTC58-0652 ,Physics: Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0017 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0338 ,Clinics: Head and Neck / EyePTC58-0539 ,General: New Horizons SessionPTC58-0390 ,Physics: Image Guidance Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0651 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0660 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0360 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0297 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0147 ,Scientific: RTTPTC58-0388 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0484 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0301 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0485 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0304 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and Delivery Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0532 ,Clinics: GIPTC58-0575 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0306 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0589 ,Clinics: CNS / Pediatrics / Lung Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0344 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0225 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0381 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0467 ,Clinics: CNS / Pediatrics / Lung Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0585 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0416 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0228 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0348 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0234 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0101 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0386 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0118 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0265 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0119 ,Clinics: GIPTC58-0218 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0267 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0387 ,Clinics: BreastPTC58-0142 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0269 ,Physics: Beam Delivery and Nozzle DesignPTC58-0620 ,Clinics: PediatricsPTC58-0048 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0220 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0461 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0029 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0571 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0046 ,Clinics: GUPTC58-0557 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0211 ,Oral AbstractsPhysics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0131 ,Oral AbstractsPhysics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0373 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0411 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0595 ,Clinics: CNS / Skull BasePTC58-0361 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0414 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0537 ,Clinics: GI / Sarcoma Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0628 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0271 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0307 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0359 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0354 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0419 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0035 ,Biology: BNCTPTC58-0474 ,Clinics: GIPTC58-0460 ,Biology: BNCTPTC58-0596 ,Clinics: GIPTC58-0222 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0193 ,Clinics: PediatricPTC58-0312 ,Clinics: GUPTC58-0441 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0701 ,Clinics: EyePTC58-0536 ,Clinics: GUPTC58-0205 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0140 ,Clinics: GUPTC58-0208 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0020 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0195 ,Poster AbstractsClinics: CNSPTC58-0717 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0325 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0015 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0634 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0646 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0566 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0134 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0376 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling SimulationPTC58-0462 ,Biology: BNCTPTC58-0567 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0527 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0482 ,Clinics: GI, GU, BreastPTC58-0693 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0518 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0686 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0202 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0322 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0564 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0680 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0247 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0682 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0440 ,Biology: Translational and BiomarkersPTC58-0514 ,Physics: Beam Delivery and Nozzle Design Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0178 ,Clinics: EyePTC58-0520 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0231 ,Clinics: Head and Neck / EyePTC58-0424 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0471 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0356 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0491 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0250 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0650 ,Biology: Biology and Clinical InterfacePTC58-0719 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0232 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0353 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0511 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0219 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0238 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0512 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and Delivery Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0401 ,Clinics: PediatricPTC58-0688 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0457 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0214 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0459 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0516 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0372 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0011 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0254 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0332 ,Clinics: CNS / Skull BasePTC58-0468 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling SimulationPTC58-0357 ,Clinics: GI / Sarcoma Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0649 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0006 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0212 ,Physics: Image Guidance Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0565 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0018 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0019 ,Clinics: BreastPTC58-0576 ,Clinics: Head and Neck / EyePTC58-0335 ,Clinics: Head and Neck / EyePTC58-0577 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0621 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0426 ,Physics: Commissioning New Facilities Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0268 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0423 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0184 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0149 ,Clinics: GIPTC58-0378 ,Clinics: GIPTC58-0257 ,Clinics: CNS / Pediatrics / Lung Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0662 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0627 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0186 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0185 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0144 ,Biology: BNCT Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0602 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0189 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0315 ,Clinics: Head and neckPTC58-0300 ,General: New Horizons SessionPTC58-0347 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0082 ,Clinics: BreastPTC58-0443 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and Delivery Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0629 ,Physics: Adaptive Therapy Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0007 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0472 ,Clinics: GI, GU, BreastPTC58-0515 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and Optimisation Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0606 ,Oral AbstractsPhysics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0450 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0657 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0551 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0192 ,Clinics: CNS / Pediatrics / Lung Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0675 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0194 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0544 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0199 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0037 ,Oral AbstractsPhysics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0207 ,Clinics: CNS / Pediatrics / Lung Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0434 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0036 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0278 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0394 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0151 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0154 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0428 ,Clinics: BreastPTC58-0116 ,Biology: Enhanced Biology in Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0435 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0681 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0323 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0583 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0448 ,Clinics: CNS / Skull BasePTC58-0251 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0721 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0203 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0455 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0130 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0679 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0329 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0604 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0449 ,Clinics: CNS / Skull BasePTC58-0132 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0607 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0122 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0243 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0165 ,Oral AbstractsPhysics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0437 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0377 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0125 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0245 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0337 ,Clinics: GI / Sarcoma Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0334 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0121 ,General: New Horizons SessionPTC58-0563 ,General: New Horizons SessionPTC58-0321 ,Clinics: Head and Neck / EyePTC58-0477 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0480 ,Clinics: GUPTC58-0010 ,Clinics: EyePTC58-0684 ,Clinics: GUPTC58-0496 ,Clinics: Head and neckPTC58-0676 ,Clinics: GUPTC58-0137 ,Physics: Beam Delivery and Nozzle Design Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0256 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0117 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0552 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0310 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0672 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0436 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0452 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0331 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0213 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling SimulationPTC58-0272 ,Clinics: EyePTC58-0326 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0568 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0444 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0379 ,Physics: Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0095 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0053 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0438 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0317 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0497 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0375 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0056 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0124 ,Clinics: GIPTC58-0009 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0014 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0374 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0727 ,General: New Horizons SessionPTC58-0578 ,Clinics: GI / Sarcoma Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0470 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0204 ,Clinics: Head and neckPTC58-0227 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0446 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0190 ,Clinics: Eye / Breast / Pelvis Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0609 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0689 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0021 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0262 ,Biology: BNCT Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0081 ,Clinics: GIPTC58-0726 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0145 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0573 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0027 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0028 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0148 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0635 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0215 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0336 ,Poster AbstractsClinics: CNSPTC58-0535 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0187 ,Biology: BNCT Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0084 ,General: New Investigator SessionPTC58-0339 ,General: New Horizons SessionPTC58-0420 ,Physics: Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0523 ,Biology: BNCT Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0088 ,Clinics: GI / Sarcoma Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0112 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0182 ,Clinics: Eye / Breast / Pelvis Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0615 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0080 ,Biology: BNCTPTC58-0085 ,Physics: Adaptive Therapy Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0722 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0253 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0255 ,Clinics: PediatricPTC58-0703 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0499 ,Physics: Image Guidance Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0380 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0259 ,Clinics: GI, GU, BreastPTC58-0288 ,Clinics: GI, GU, BreastPTC58-0045 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative DosimetryPTC58-0619 ,Clinics: PediatricPTC58-0707 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0196 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0074 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0077 ,Biology: BNCT Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0073 ,Biology: BNCTPTC58-0075 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon, Proton and Photons Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0093 ,Clinics: GUPTC58-0161 ,Clinics: GI / Sarcoma Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0371 ,Physics: Monitoring and Modelling MotionPTC58-0181 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0120 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0362 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0364 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0473 ,Scientific: RTTPTC58-0641 ,Clinics: CNS / Pediatrics / Lung Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0296 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0004 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0128 ,Clinics: BreastPTC58-0316 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and Delivery Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0236 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0008 ,General: New Investigator SessionPTC58-0673 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0167 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0289 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0284 ,General: New Horizons SessionPTC58-0522 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0164 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0285 ,Clinics: Eye / Breast / Pelvis Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0623 ,Clinics: Eye / Breast / Pelvis Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0502 ,Clinics: GUPTC58-0293 ,Biology: Translational and BiomarkersPTC58-0599 ,Biology: BNCTPTC58-0063 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0656 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0592 ,Biology: BNCT Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0092 ,Poster AbstractsClinics: CNSPTC58-0302 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0464 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0352 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0465 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0476 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0100 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0235 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0349 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0094 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and Delivery Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0367 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0400 ,Biology: Translational and BiomarkersPTC58-0244 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0640 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0355 ,General: New Investigator SessionPTC58-0320 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0057 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0174 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0295 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0529 ,Clinics: GI / Sarcoma Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0123 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0171 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon, Proton and Photons Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0049 ,Clinics: BreastPTC58-0731 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0223 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0102 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0466 ,Scientific: RTTPTC58-0503 ,Clinics: CNS / Pediatrics / Lung Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0389 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0108 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0109 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0736 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0343 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0342 ,Clinics: GI, GU, BreastPTC58-0237 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0711 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0581 ,Clinics: GI, GU, BreastPTC58-0114 ,Clinics: Base of SkullPTC58-0730 ,Clinics: Head and neckPTC58-0383 ,Clinics: CNS / Skull BasePTC58-0559 ,Clinics: Base of SkullPTC58-0613 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0691 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon, Proton and Photons Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0054 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0210 ,Clinics: BreastPTC58-0729 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0574 ,Clinics: GI, GU, BreastPTC58-0239 ,Scientific: RTTPTC58-0637 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0579 ,Clinics: Lung / Sarcoma / LymphomaPTC58-0176 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0699 ,Clinics: CNS / Pediatrics / Lung Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0156 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0333 ,Biology: Translational and BiomarkersPTC58-0345 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0369 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0509 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling SimulationPTC58-0658 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon, Proton and Photons Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0051 ,General: New Investigator SessionPTC58-0548 ,Clinics: GI, GU, BreastPTC58-0241 ,Clinics: Eye / Breast / Pelvis Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0412 ,Clinics: GI / Sarcoma Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0024 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0226 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon, Proton and Photons Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0069 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0562 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0561 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0201 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0439 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0445 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0324 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0031 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0558 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0392 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0678 ,Physics: Beam Delivery and Nozzle DesignPTC58-0090 ,General: New Investigator SessionPTC58-0630 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon / Proton and Photons Carbons / Proton and PhotonPTC58-0524 ,Physics: Commissioning New FacilitiesPTC58-0713 ,Clinics: GI, GU, BreastPTC58-0139 ,Clinics: CNS / Pediatrics / Lung Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0248 ,Clinics: CNS / Pediatrics / Lung Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0368 ,Biology: Enhanced Biology in Treatment PlanningPTC58-0519 ,General: New Horizons SessionPTC58-0720 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0083 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0311 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0674 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0553 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0023 ,Scientific: RTTPTC58-0612 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0677 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0545 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0601 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0725 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0098 ,Physics: Dose Calculation and OptimisationPTC58-0605 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon / Proton and Photons Carbons / Proton and PhotonPTC58-0517 ,Biology: Translational and Biomarkers Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0618 ,Physics: Monitoring and Modelling MotionPTC58-0481 ,Clinics: GI / Sarcoma Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0071 ,Physics: Adaptive TherapyPTC58-0351 ,Physics: 4D Treatment and DeliveryPTC58-0702 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0734 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0611 ,Physics: Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0486 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative Dosimetry Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0442 ,Biology: Drug and Immunotherapy CombinationsPTC58-0327 ,Clinics: Head and Neck / EyePTC58-0096 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0159 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0708 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0097 ,Physics: Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0350 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon / Proton and Photons Carbons / Proton and PhotonPTC58-0016 ,Physics: Adaptive TherapyPTC58-0104 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative Dosimetry Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0433 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0608 ,Biology: Translational and Biomarkers Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0610 ,Clinics: Head and neckPTC58-0058 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0715 ,Clinics: Head and neckPTC58-0298 ,Clinics: EyePTC58-0099 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0086 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0089 ,Clinics: Lung / Sarcoma / LymphomaPTC58-0200 ,Poster AbstractsClinics: CNSPTC58-0157 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0141 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0260 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0264 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0513 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0631 ,Clinics: Eye / Breast / Pelvis Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0469 ,Biology: BNCT Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0384 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0639 ,Clinics: PediatricsPTC58-0700 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0136 ,Clinics: BreastPTC58-0706 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0079 ,Biology: Drug and Immunotherapy Combinations Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0406 ,Clinics: Base of SkullPTC58-0382 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0624 ,Physics: Beam Delivery and Nozzle DesignPTC58-0173 ,Biology: Drug and Immunotherapy CombinationsPTC58-0358 ,Poster AbstractsClinics: CNSPTC58-0690 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0061 ,Clinics: Lung / Sarcoma / LymphomaPTC58-0580 ,Physics: Monitoring and Modelling MotionPTC58-0162 ,Physics: Adaptive TherapyPTC58-0550 ,Physics: Adaptive TherapyPTC58-0430 ,Clinics: Lung / Sarcoma / LymphomaPTC58-0103 ,General: New Investigator SessionPTC58-0252 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0704 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0418 ,Clinics: Base of SkullPTC58-0572 ,Clinics: Lung / Sarcoma / LymphomaPTC58-0106 ,Physics: Beam Delivery and Nozzle DesignPTC58-0022 ,Physics: Monitoring and Modelling MotionPTC58-0279 ,Physics: Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0447 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0622 ,Clinics: PediatricsPTC58-0644 ,Biology: Biology and Clinical InterfacePTC58-0490 ,Clinics: CNS / Skull BasePTC58-0716 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0292 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon / Proton and Photons Carbons / Proton and PhotonPTC58-0570 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0059 ,Physics: Quality Assurance and VerificationPTC58-0710 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon / Proton and Photons Carbons / Proton and PhotonPTC58-0216 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0404 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0525 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0526 ,Poster AbstractsClinics: CNSPTC58-0328 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0070 ,Clinics: Eye / Breast / Pelvis Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0135 ,Biology: BNCT Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0391 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0510 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0636 ,Physics: Treatment PlanningPTC58-0638 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0408 ,Physics: Absolute and Relative Dosimetry Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0632 ,Physics: Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0318 ,Biology: Enhanced Biology in Treatment PlanningPTC58-0246 ,Clinics: PediatricsPTC58-0504 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0160 ,Physics: Image Guidance Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0076 ,Physics: Monitoring and Modelling MotionPTC58-0143 ,Biology: Mathematical Modelling and SimulationPTC58-0718 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0671 ,Clinics: LungPTC58-0183 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0670 ,Report ,Physics: Treatment Planning Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0422 ,Biology: Biological Differences between Carbon / Proton and Photons Carbons / Proton and PhotonPTC58-0129 ,Physics: Adaptive Therapy Poster Discussion SessionsPTC58-0705 ,Biology: Enhanced Biology in Treatment PlanningPTC58-0258 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0030 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0150 ,Biology: Biology and Clinical InterfacePTC58-0479 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0153 ,Clinics: PediatricPTC58-0087 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0152 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0155 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0033 ,General: New HorizonsPTC58-0158 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0429 ,Biology: Translational and BiomarkersPTC58-0287 ,Physics: Adaptive TherapyPTC58-0403 ,Physics: Image GuidancePTC58-0309 - Published
- 2020
11. Protonentherapie der retroperitonealen Sarkome : Ergebnisse der prospektiven Registerstudien ProReg und KiProReg
- Author
-
Lin, Y.-L., Jazmati, D., Worawongsakul, R., Schulze Schleithoff, Stefanie, Blase, C., Sparber-Sauer, M., Dirken, U., Bauer, Sebastian, and Timmermann, Beate
- Subjects
Medizin - Published
- 2022
12. Faktoren, die die pathologische Komplettremission und Tumorregression bei neoadjuvanter Radiotherapie und Chemotherapie bei Brustkrebs mit hohem Risiko beeinflussen.
- Author
-
Haussmann, J., Budach, W., Nestle-Krämling, C., Wollandt, S., Jazmati, D., Tamaskovics, B., Corradini, S., Bölke, E., Haussmann, A., Audretsch, W., and Matuschek, C.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. P 59 Interplay of the cellular actions of neuropeptide Y and transcranial magnetic theta-burst stimulation on cortical inhibitory systems – a rat study
- Author
-
Jazmati, D., primary, Neubacher, U., additional, Aliane, V., additional, and Funke, K., additional
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Medical Students' Development of Ethical Judgment - Exploring the Learners' Perspectives using a mixed methods approach
- Author
-
Langer, T, Jazmati, D, Jung, O, Schulz, C, Schnell, MW, Langer, T, Jazmati, D, Jung, O, Schulz, C, and Schnell, MW
- Abstract
Objective: Contemporary healthcare requires physicians to have well developed ethical judgment skills in addition to excellent clinical skills. However, no consensus has been reached on how to best teach ethical judgment skills during medical training. Previous studies revealed inconclusive results and applied varying theoretical frameworks. To date, the students' perspectives on their development in ethical judgment has received less attention. Better insights in the learners' experiences can help to improve educational interventions in medical ethics.Methods: A vignette featuring a challenging case with opposing views between a patient's parents and a physician followed by a questionnaire was presented to a cohort of medical students at a German medical school at three points in time during their medical training (Year 1, 2 and 5). The questionnaire included closed and open-ended questions addressing the participant's preferred, hypothetical actions, their reasoning as well as the resources informing their reasoning. Content analysis was used for qualitative data; frequencies and percentages were used to describe quantitative findings. Results: The response rate remained stable (28%) over the study period. Participants' responses changed overtime. Accepting parents' autonomy in the decision-making process was the majority standpoint of students in year 1 and 2 and became less often cited in year 5 (Year 1/2/5: 68/67/48%). On the contrary, not readily following the parents' decision for medical reasons was a minority standpoint in year 1 and became more prevalent over time (year 1/2/5: 12/17/42%). Judgments were only partly based on ethics training. Instead, participants drew on experiences from their clinical clerkships and their personal lives. Throughout the study, participants did not feel well-prepared to make a judgment in the case (Average 2.7 on a Likert-Scale; 1=very well prepared, 4=very poor). Conclusions: Over the course of their medical training, the p, Hintergrund: Die gegenwärtige Medizin erfordert von Ärzten nicht nur exzellente klinische Fähigkeiten, sondern auch ein hochentwickeltes, ethisches Urteilsvermögen. Bisher gibt es jedoch keinen Konsens darüber, wie man ethisches Urteilsvermögen während des Medizinstudiums optimal vermittelt. Vorangegangene Studien erbrachten keine eindeutigen Ergebnisse und verwendeten uneinheitliche theoretische Konzepte. Insbesondere die Perspektive der Studierende auf die Entwicklung ihres ethischen Urteilsvermögens erhielt wenig Aufmerksamkeit. Einsichten in die Lernerfahrungen der Studenten können helfen, die Entwicklung der ethischen Urteilsfähigkeit besser zu fördern. Methoden: Den Teilnehmern wurde dreimal während des Studiums (1., 2. und 5. Jahr) eine Vignette vorgelegt, in der ein komplexer Fall beschrieben wird und in der die beteiligten Eltern des Patienten und der Arzt unterschiedliche Perspektiven einnehmen. Der begleitende Fragebogen beinhaltete geschlossene und offene Fragen, die das hypothetische Vorgehen des Teilnehmers, seine Begründung und die hinzugezogenen Ressourcen explorieren. Eine Inhaltsanalyse wurde für die qualitativen Daten verwendet; absolute Häufigkeiten und Prozentangaben wurden bestimmt, um quantitative Untersuchungsergebnisse zu beschreiben. Ergebnisse: Die Rücklaufquote blieb über den Untersuchungszeitraum stabil (28 %). Bei den Antworten zeigten sich Veränderungen im Untersuchungszeitraum. Im ersten und zweiten Jahr vertrat die Mehrheit der Teilnehmer den Standpunkt, dass die Autonomie der Eltern im Entscheidungsfindungsprozess Vorrang habe, was im 5. Jahr seltener angegeben wurde (Jahr 1/2/5: 68/67/48%). Im Gegensatz dazu vertraten im Jahr 1 wenige Teilnehmer den Standpunkt, dass dem Wunsch der Eltern aus medizinischen Gründen nicht zu folgen sei; eine Haltung die später häufiger eingenommen wurde (Jahr 1/2/5: 12/17/42%). Der Ethikunterricht hatte in der Urteilsfindung eine mäßige Bedeutung. Vielmehr beriefen sich die Teilnehmer auf Erfahrungen
- Published
- 2016
15. EP 145. Neuropeptide Y and the cellular effects of transcranial magnetic theta-burst stimulation in rat neocortex
- Author
-
Jazmati, D., primary, Neubacher, U., additional, Aliane, V., additional, and Funke, K., additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Lokaltherapieverfahren bei Blasen-Prostata- Rhabdomyosarkomen anhand der CWS Datenbank
- Author
-
Eckert, F., Baumann, D., Schmidt, A., Urla, C., Jazmati, D., Zips, D., Martin Ebinger, Sparber-Sauer, M., Timmermann, B., Fuchs, J., and Paulsen, F.
- Subjects
Medizin ,ComputingMethodologies_GENERAL - Abstract
Poster-Abstract
17. Factors influencing pathological complete response and tumor regression in neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer.
- Author
-
Haussmann J, Budach W, Nestle-Krämling C, Wollandt S, Jazmati D, Tamaskovics B, Corradini S, Bölke E, Haussmann A, Audretsch W, and Matuschek C
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Adult, Aged, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Prognosis, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Treatment Outcome, ROC Curve, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Breast Neoplasms radiotherapy, Breast Neoplasms therapy, Neoadjuvant Therapy
- Abstract
Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) is a well-established prognostic factor in breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (naST). The determining factors of pCR are known to be intrinsic subtype, proliferation index, grading, clinical tumor and nodal stage as well as type of systemic therapy. The addition of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (naRT) to this paradigm might improve response, freedom from disease, toxicity and cosmetic outcome compared to adjuvant radiotherapy. The factors for pCR and primary tumor regression when neoadjuvant radiation therapy is added to chemotherapy have not been thoroughly described., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 341 patients (cT1-cT4/cN0-N+) treated with naRT and naST between 1990 and 2003. Patients underwent naRT to the breast and mostly to the supra-/infraclavicular lymph nodes combined with an electron or brachytherapy boost. NaST was given either sequentially or simultaneously to naRT using different regimens. We used the univariate and multivariate regression analysis to estimate the effect of different subgroups and treatment modalities on pCR (ypT0/Tis and ypN0) as well as complete primary tumor response (ypT0/Tis; bpCR) in our cohort. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the interval between radiotherapy (RT) and resection (Rx) as well as radiotherapy dose., Results: Out of 341 patients, pCR and pbCR were achieved in 31% and 39%, respectively. pCR rate was influenced by resection type, breast cancer subtype, primary tumor stage and interval from radiation to surgery in the multivariate analysis. Univariate analysis of bpCR showed age, resection type, breast cancer subtype, clinical tumor stage and grading as significant factors. Resection type, subtype and clinical tumor stage remained significant in multivariate analysis. Radiation dose to the tumor and interval from radiation to surgery were not significant factors for pCR. However, when treatment factors were added to the model, a longer interval from radiotherapy to resection was a significant predictor for pCR., Conclusions: The factors associated with pCR following naST and naRT are similar to known factors after naST alone. Longer interval to surgery might to be associated with higher pCR rates. Dose escalation beyond 60 Gy did not result in higher response rates., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Comparison of adverse events in partial- or whole breast radiotherapy: investigation of cosmesis, toxicities and quality of life in a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
- Author
-
Haussmann J, Budach W, Corradini S, Krug D, Jazmati D, Tamaskovics B, Bölke E, Pedotoa A, Kammers K, and Matuschek C
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Treatment Outcome, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Breast, Mastectomy, Segmental, Quality of Life, Breast Neoplasms radiotherapy, Breast Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Purpose/objective: Adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy and systemic therapy are part of the current evidence-based treatment protocols for early breast cancer, after breast-conserving surgery. Numerous randomized trials have investigated the therapeutic effects of partial breast irradiation (PBI) compared to whole breast irradiation (WBI), limiting the treated breast tissue. These trials were designed to achieve equal control of the disease with possible reduction in adverse events, improvements in cosmesis and quality of life (QoL). In this meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the differences between PBI and WBI in side effects and QoL., Material/methods: We performed a systematic literature review searching for randomized trials comparing WBI and PBI in early-stage breast cancer with publication dates after 2009. The meta-analysis was performed using the published event rates and the effect-sizes for available acute and late adverse events. Additionally, we evaluated cosmetic outcomes as well as general and breast-specific QoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires., Results: Sixteen studies were identified (n = 19,085 patients). PBI was associated with a lower prevalence in any grade 1 + acute toxicity and grade 2 + skin toxicity (OR = 0.12; 95% CI 0.09-0.18; p < 0.001); (OR = 0.16; 95% CI 0.07-0.41; p < 0.001). There was neither a significant difference in late adverse events between the two treatments, nor in any unfavorable cosmetic outcomes, rated by either medical professionals or patients. PBI-technique using EBRT with twice-daily fractionation schedules resulted in worse cosmesis rated by patients (n = 3215; OR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.22-3.54; p = 0.007) compared to WBI. Maximum once-daily EBRT schedules (n = 2071; OR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.45-0.79; p < 0.001) and IORT (p = 0.042) resulted in better cosmetic results grade by medical professionals. Functional- and symptom-based QoL in the C30-scale was not different between PBI and WBI. Breast-specific QoL was superior after PBI in the subdomains of "systemic therapy side effects" as well as "breast-" and "arm symptoms"., Conclusion: The analysis of multiple randomized trials demonstrate a superiority of PBI in acute toxicity as well breast-specific quality of life, when compared with WBI. Overall, late toxicities and cosmetic results were similar. PBI-technique with a fractionation of twice-daily schedules resulted in worse cosmesis rated by patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Current situation in radiation oncology residency-Results of a national survey performed by the working group Young DEGRO of the German Society of Radiation Oncology.
- Author
-
Fleischmann DF, Büttner M, Oertel M, Waltenberger M, Süß C, Ziegler S, Käsmann L, Jazmati D, Schröder A, Mäurer M, and Linde P
- Subjects
- Humans, Curriculum, Surveys and Questionnaires, Germany, Internship and Residency, Radiation Oncology education
- Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the current status of the radiation oncology (RO) residency programs in Germany. For this, RO residents and RO specialists were surveyed regarding the current situation of the RO residency training and the working conditions in Germany., Methods: The Continuing Education Section of the Young DEGRO (yDEGRO) Working Group of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) developed a survey to assess (1) the overall satisfaction, learning objectives, and teaching methods used during training; and (2) the perception of the importance of specific disease patterns in RO training. Open-ended questions were also asked to elicit opinions on areas for improvement. From 21 November to 27 December 2022, RO residents registered with DEGRO and/or in the working group yDEGRO were invited to participate anonymously in an online questionnaire., Results: Overall, 97 participants completed the survey, including 65 RO residents (67%) and 32 RO specialists (33%); 66 (68%) of the respondents reported being employed in the university setting, 23 (23.7%) in the non-university setting, and 8 (8.3%) in private practice. Within the training, heterogeneity was found in the teaching methods used. In terms of knowledge transfer, the greatest importance was accorded to annual continuing education discussions with the head of the residency training (92.8%), participation in tumor boards (85.6%), written training concepts (81.4%), and evaluations at the beginning (76.3%) and end of a rotation (80.4%). The arithmetic mean of satisfaction with specialist training was 6/10 points (SD: 1.99); 88.7% of respondents would like to see a nationally uniform and mandatory curriculum in RO residency training., Conclusion: The study provides suggestions for improving RO medical training in Germany: further development of accompanying education and training programs in cooperation with professional associations, e.g., the DEGRO, structured feedback, and supervision., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. [Treatment paradigms in hepatocellular carcinoma: insights gained from the TRENDY trial].
- Author
-
Jazmati D, Boda-Heggemann J, Blanck O, and Krug D
- Subjects
- Humans, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular radiotherapy, Liver Neoplasms radiotherapy, Chemoembolization, Therapeutic
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Whole Breast Irradiation in Comparison to Endocrine Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer-A Direct and Network Meta-Analysis of Published Randomized Trials.
- Author
-
Haussmann J, Budach W, Corradini S, Krug D, Bölke E, Tamaskovics B, Jazmati D, Haussmann A, and Matuschek C
- Abstract
Background: Multiple randomized trials have established adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) and whole breast irradiation (WBI) as the standard approach after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in early-stage breast cancer. The omission of WBI has been studied in multiple trials and resulted in reduced local control with maintained survival rates and has therefore been adapted as a treatment option in selected patients in several guidelines. Omitting ET instead of WBI might also be a valuable option as both treatments have distinctly different side effect profiles. However, the clinical outcomes of BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI have not been formally analyzed., Methods: We performed a systematic literature review searching for randomized trials comparing BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI in low-risk breast cancer patients with publication dates after 2000. We excluded trials using any form of chemotherapy, regional nodal radiation and mastectomy. The meta-analysis was performed using a two-step process. First, we extracted all available published event rates and the effect sizes for overall and breast-cancer-specific survival (OS, BCSS), local (LR) and regional recurrence, disease-free survival, distant metastases-free interval, contralateral breast cancer, second cancer other than breast cancer and mastectomy-free interval as investigated endpoints and compared them in a network meta-analysis. Second, the published individual patient data from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) publications were used to allow a comparison of OS and BCSS., Results: We identified three studies, including a direct comparison of BCS + ET vs. BCS + WBI ( n = 1059) and nine studies randomizing overall 7207 patients additionally to BCS only and BCS + WBI + ET resulting in a four-arm comparison. In the network analysis, LR was significantly lower in the BCS + WBI group in comparison with the BCS + ET group (HR = 0.62; CI-95%: 0.42-0.92; p = 0.019). We did not find any differences in OS (HR = 0.93; CI-95%: 0.53-1.62; p = 0.785) and BCSS (OR = 1.04; CI-95%: 0.45-2.41; p = 0.928). Further, we found a lower distant metastasis-free interval, a higher rate of contralateral breast cancer and a reduced mastectomy-free interval in the BCS + WBI-arm. Using the EBCTCG data, OS and BCSS were not significantly different between BCS + ET and BCS + WBI after 10 years (OS: OR = 0.85; CI-95%: 0.59-1.22; p = 0.369) (BCSS: OR = 0.72; CI-95%: 0.38-1.36; p = 0.305)., Conclusion: Evidence from direct and indirect comparison suggests that BCS + WBI might be an equivalent de-escalation strategy to BCS + ET in low-risk breast cancer. Adverse events and quality of life measures have to be further compared between these approaches.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Whole body irradiation with intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: analysis of organs at risk by dose and its effect on blood kinetics.
- Author
-
Köksal M, Baumert J, Jazmati D, Schoroth F, Garbe S, Koch D, Scafa D, Sarria GR, Leitzen C, Massoth G, Delis A, Heine A, Holderried T, Brossart P, Müdder T, and Schmeel LC
- Subjects
- Humans, Whole-Body Irradiation methods, Organs at Risk radiation effects, Kinetics, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated adverse effects, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated methods, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Abstract
Background: Intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy (HT) is a promising technique in preparation for bone marrow transplantation. Nevertheless, radiation-sensitive organs can be substantially compromised due to suboptimal delivery techniques of total body irradiation (TBI). To reduce the potential burden of radiation toxicity to organs at risk (OAR), high-quality coverage and homogeneity are essential. We investigated dosimetric data from kidney, lung and thorax, liver, and spleen in relation to peripheral blood kinetics. To further advance intensity-modulated total body irradiation (TBI), the potential for dose reduction to lung and kidney was considered in the analysis., Patients and Methods: 46 patients undergoing TBI were included in this analysis, partially divided into dose groups (2, 4, 8, and 12 Gy). HT was performed using a rotating gantry to ensuring optimal reduction of radiation to the lungs and kidneys and to provide optimal coverage of other OAR. Common dosimetric parameters, such as D05, D95, and D50, were calculated and analysed. Leukocytes, neutrophils, platelets, creatinine, GFR, haemoglobin, overall survival, and graft-versus-host disease were related to the dosimetric evaluation using statistical tests., Results: The mean D95 of the lung is 48.23%, less than half the prescribed and unreduced dose. The D95 of the chest is almost twice as high at 84.95%. Overall liver coverage values ranged from 96.79% for D95 to 107% for D05. The average dose sparing of all patients analysed resulted in an average D95 of 68.64% in the right kidney and 69.31% in the left kidney. Average D95 in the spleen was 94.28% and D05 was 107.05%. Homogeneity indexes ranged from 1.12 for liver to 2.28 for lung. The additional significance analyses conducted on these blood kinetics showed a significant difference between the 2 Gray group and the other three groups for leukocyte counts. Further statistical comparisons of the dose groups showed no significant differences. However, there were significant changes in the dose of OAR prescribed with dose sparing (e.g., lung vs. rib and kidney)., Conclusion: Using intensity-modulated helical tomotherapy to deliver TBI is a feasible method in preparation for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Significant dose sparing in radiosensitive organs such as the lungs and kidneys is achievable with good overall quality of coverage. Peripheral blood kinetics support the positive impact of HT and its advantages strongly encourage its implementation within clinical routine., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Safety and efficacy of two-drug combination in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer and validation of the Charlson Index as a predictor of survival.
- Author
-
Lach M, Otto J, Bondiau PY, Boulahssass R, Schiappa R, Jazmati D, von Krüchten R, Martin N, and Doyen J
- Abstract
Background: The best platinum-based chemotherapy regimen remains to be determined in elderly patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Predictive indexes for toxicity and survival are also needed to give the safest and most effective treatment for this population., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIA, IIIB or IIIC NSCLC over 70 years of age, treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were included. Patients from two cancer centers treated between 12/2006 and 08/2019 were included in the data analysis., Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 76.6 years [interquartile range (IQR): 71.6-83.4]. Thirty-nine patients were treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy and 19 with a sequential strategy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted in a combination of platinum and taxanes. At a median follow-up of 52 months (IQR: 7-69), the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.5% and 66.9%, respectively. Male sex and a high Charlson index were identified as independent prognostic factors for worse OS. Acute grade 3-5 toxicities occurred in 34.4% of patients, including 1 grade 5 toxicity, and grade 3-4 late toxicities occurred in 17.2% of patients. In the whole cohort a high Charlson index was the only predictive factor for a higher risk of grade 3-5 acute toxicities (statistical trend in the concurrent cohort, P=0.06)., Conclusions: The Charlson index correlated with toxicity and survival in elderly patients treated with chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC. The addition of taxanes to platinum chemotherapy was safe in the present study and warrants further exploration., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-108/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Editorial: Immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and implications for clinical outcome.
- Author
-
Bölke E, van Griensven M, Schneider EM, Fischer JC, Feldt T, Keitel V, Budach W, Haussmann J, Jazmati D, and Matuschek C
- Subjects
- Humans, Inflammation, Cytokines, Immunity, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19
- Abstract
Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Overcoming inter-observer planning variability in target volume contouring and dose planning for high-risk neuroblastoma - a European multicenter effort of the SIOPEN radiotherapy committee.
- Author
-
Jazmati D, Brualla L, Littooij AS, Webber B, Dieckmann K, Janssens GO, Simon T, Gaze MN, Merta J, Serrano A, Dietzsch S, Kramer PH, Wulff J, Boterberg T, and Timmermann B
- Subjects
- Humans, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods, Prospective Studies, Lung, Observer Variation, Radiation Oncology, Neuroblastoma diagnostic imaging, Neuroblastoma radiotherapy
- Abstract
Background and Purpose: To establish an international quality standard for contouring and planning for high-risk neuroblastoma within the prospective High-Risk Neuroblastoma Study 2 of SIOP-Europe-Neuroblastoma (SIOPEN HR-NBL2), which includes a randomized question on dose escalation for residual disease., Materials and Methods: Data on four patients with high-risk neuroblastoma were selected and distributed to the radiotherapy committee of the HR-NBL2 study for independent contouring and planning. Differences in contouring were analyzed using apparent and kappa-corrected agreement. Plans were analyzed regarding the dose-volume histogram metrics. Results were discussed among experts and agreement was obtained., Results: Substantial agreement was found for contouring of the heart (0.64), liver (0.70), left lung (0.74), and right lung (0.74). For contouring of the gastrointestinal tract (0.54), left kidney (0.60), and right kidney (0.59) moderate agreement was obtained. For target volume delineation, agreement for preoperative tumour extent was moderate (0.42), for CTV fair (0.35) and only low (0.06) for residual tumour, respectively. The dose planning strategies appeared to be relatively homogeneous among all experts., Conclusion: Considerable variability was found for the delineation of target volumes, particularly the boost volume, whereas the contouring of the organs at risk and the planning strategy were reasonably consistent. In order to obtain reliable results from the randomized HR-NBL2 trial, standardization of target volume delineation based on adequate imaging is crucial., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Percutaneous fractionated radiotherapy of the groin to eliminate lymphatic fistulas after vascular surgery.
- Author
-
Jazmati D, Tamaskovics B, Hoff NP, Homey B, Bölke E, Boyomo B, Garabet W, Haussmann J, Budach W, Neuwahl J, Schelzig H, Corradini S, van Griensven M, Fischer J, Knoefel WT, Pegani J, Pedoto A, Antoch G, Kirchner J, Lüdde T, Freise NF, Feldt T, Jensen BO, Keitel V, and Matuschek C
- Subjects
- Male, Female, Humans, Groin surgery, Retrospective Studies, Pilot Projects, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Dose Fractionation, Radiation, Lymph Node Excision adverse effects, Lymphatic Diseases etiology, Lymphatic Diseases radiotherapy, Fistula complications, Fistula radiotherapy, Melanoma complications
- Abstract
Background: Vascular surgery of the inguinal area can be complicated by persistent lymphatic fistulas. Rapid and effective treatment is essential to prevent infection, sepsis, bleeding, and possible leg amputation. Current data on irradiation of lymphatic fistulas lack recommendation on the appropriate individual and total dose, the time of irradiation, and the target volume. Presumably, a dose of 0.3-0.5 to 1-12 Gy should be sufficient for the purpose. Currently, radiotherapy is a "can" recommendation, with a level 4 low evidence and a grade C recommendation, according to the DEGRO S2 guidelines. As part of a pilot study, we analyzed the impact and limitations of low-dose radiation therapy in the treatment of inguinal lymphatic fistulas., Patients and Methods: As a part of an internal quality control project, patients with lymphatic fistulas irradiated in the groin area after vascular surgery for arterial occlusive disease (AOD) III-IV, repair of pseudo aneurysm or lymph node dissection due to melanoma were selected, and an exploratory analysis on retrospectively collected data performed., Results: Twelve patients (10 males and 2 females) aged 62.83 ± 12.14 years underwent open vascular reconstruction for stage II (n = 2), III (n = 1), and IV (n = 7) arterial occlusive disease (AOD), lymph node dissection for melanoma (n = 1) or repair of a pseudoaneurysm (n = 1). Surgical vascular access was obtained through the groin and was associated with a persistent lymphatic fistula, secreting more than 50 ml/day. Patients were irradiated five times a week up to a maximum of 10 fractions for the duration of the radiation period. Fraction of 0.4 Gy was applied in the first 7 cases, while 5 patients were treated with a de-escalating dose of 0.3 Gy. There was a resolution of the lymphatic fistula in every patient without higher grade complications., Conclusion: Low-dose irradiation of the groin is a treatment option for persistent lymphatic fistula after inguinal vascular surgery., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Is an Endorectal Balloon Beneficial for Rectal Sparing after Spacer Implantation in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Proton Beam Therapy? A Dosimetric and Radiobiological Comparison Study.
- Author
-
Ahmad Khalil D, Wulff J, Jazmati D, Geismar D, Bäumer C, Kramer PH, Steinmeier T, Schleithoff SS, Tschirdewahn S, Hadaschik B, and Timmermann B
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Rectum, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods, Hydrogels, Proton Therapy methods, Prostatic Neoplasms radiotherapy
- Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to examine the dosimetric influence of endorectal balloons (ERB) on rectal sparing in prostate cancer patients with implanted hydrogel rectum spacers treated with dose-escalated or hypofractionated intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT)., Methods: Ten patients with localized prostate cancer included in the ProRegPros study and treated at our center were investigated. All patients underwent placement of hydrogel rectum spacers before planning. Two planning CTs (with and without 120 cm
3 fluid-filled ERB) were applied for each patient. Dose prescription was set according to the h strategy, with 72 Gray (Gy)/2.4 Gy/5× weekly to prostate + 1 cm of the seminal vesicle, and 60 Gy/2 Gy/5× weekly to prostate + 2 cm of the seminal vesicle. Planning with two laterally opposed IMPT beams was performed in both CTs. Rectal dosimetry values including dose-volume statistics and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were compared for both plans (non-ERB plans vs. ERB plans)., Results: For ERB plans compared with non-ERB, the reductions were 8.51 ± 5.25 Gy (RBE) ( p = 0.000) and 15.76 ± 11.11 Gy ( p = 0.001) for the mean and the median rectal doses, respectively. No significant reductions in rectal volumes were found after high dose levels. The use of ERB resulted in significant reduction in rectal volume after receiving 50 Gy (RBE), 40 Gy (RBE), 30 Gy (RBE), 20 Gy (RBE), and 10 Gy (RBE) with p values of 0.034, 0.008, 0.003, 0.001, and 0.001, respectively. No differences between ERB and non-ERB plans for the anterior rectum were observed. ERB reduced posterior rectal volumes in patients who received 30 Gy (RBE), 20 Gy (RBE), or 10 Gy (RBE), with p values of 0.019, 0.003, and 0.001, respectively. According to the NTCP models, no significant reductions were observed in mean or median rectal toxicity (late rectal bleeding ≥ 2, necrosis or stenosis, and late rectal toxicity ≥ 3) when using the ERB., Conclusion: ERB reduced rectal volumes exposed to intermediate or low dose levels. However, no significant reduction in rectal volume was observed in patients receiving high or intermediate doses. There was no benefit and also no disadvantage associated with the use of ERB for late rectal toxicity, according to available NTCP models.- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Prognostic markers for the clinical course in the blood of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
- Author
-
Fischer JC, Balz V, Jazmati D, Bölke E, Freise NF, Keitel V, Feldt T, Jensen BO, Bode J, Lüdde T, Häussinger D, Adams O, Schneider EM, Enczmann J, Rox JM, Hermsen D, Schulze-Bosse K, Kindgen-Milles D, Knoefel WT, van Griensven M, Haussmann J, Tamaskovics B, Plettenberg C, Scheckenbach K, Corradini S, Pedoto A, Maas K, Schmidt L, Grebe O, Esposito I, Ehrhardt A, Peiper M, Buhren BA, Calles C, Stöhr A, Gerber PA, Lichtenberg A, Schelzig H, Flaig Y, Rezazadeh A, Budach W, and Matuschek C
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, HLA-DQ Antigens genetics, Prognosis, RNA, Viral, SARS-CoV-2, HLA-DRB1 Chains, COVID-19 genetics
- Abstract
Background: The presentation of peptides and the subsequent immune response depend on the MHC characteristics and influence the specificity of the immune response. Several studies have found an association between HLA variants and differential COVID-19 outcomes and have shown that HLA genotypes are associated with differential immune responses against SARS-CoV-2, particularly in severely ill patients. Information, whether HLA haplotypes are associated with the severity or length of the disease in moderately diseased individuals is absent., Methods: Next-generation sequencing-based HLA typing was performed in 303 female and 231 male non-hospitalized North Rhine Westphalian patients infected with SARS-CoV2 during the first and second wave. For HLA-Class I, we obtained results from 528 patients, and for HLA-Class II from 531. In those patients, who became ill between March 2020 and January 2021, the 22 most common HLA-Class I (HLA-A, -B, -C) or HLA-Class II (HLA -DRB1/3/4, -DQA1, -DQB1) haplotypes were determined. The identified HLA haplotypes as well as the presence of a CCR5Δ32 mutation and number of O and A blood group alleles were associated to disease severity and duration of the disease., Results: The influence of the HLA haplotypes on disease severity and duration was more pronounced than the influence of age, sex, or ABO blood group. These associations were sex dependent. The presence of mutated CCR5 resulted in a longer recovery period in males., Conclusion: The existence of certain HLA haplotypes is associated with more severe disease., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Efficacy and Feasibility of Proton Beam Therapy in Relapsed High-Risk Neuroblastoma-Experiences from the Prospective KiProReg Registry.
- Author
-
Jazmati D, Hero B, Thole-Kliesch TM, Merta J, Deubzer HE, Bäumer C, Heinzelmann F, Schleithoff SS, Koerber F, Eggert A, Schwarz R, Simon T, and Timmermann B
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Retrospective Studies, Prospective Studies, Feasibility Studies, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local radiotherapy, Registries, Proton Therapy adverse effects, Neuroblastoma radiotherapy, Neuroblastoma etiology
- Abstract
Background: Despite an intensive multimodal treatment approach, approximately 50% of high-risk (HR) neuroblastoma (NB) patients experience progression. Despite the advances in targeted therapy, high-dose chemotherapy, and other systemic treatment options, radiation therapy (RT) to sites of relapsed disease can be an option to reduce tumor burden and improve chance for disease control., Methods: Patients who received salvage irradiation with proton beam therapy (PBT) for local or metastatic relapse of HR NB within the prospective registry trials KiProReg and ProReg were eligible for this retrospective analysis. Data on patient characteristics, multimodality therapy, adverse events, and oncologic endpoints were evaluated. Adverse events were assessed before, during, and after PBT according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) V4.0., Results: Between September 2013 and September 2020, twenty (11 male; 9 female) consecutive patients experiencing local ( N = 9) or distant recurrence ( N = 25) were identified for this analysis. Distant recurrences included osteomedullary ( N = 11) or CNS lesions ( N = 14). Salvage therapy consisted of re-induction chemo- or chemo-immuno-therapy ( N = 19), surgery ( N = 6), high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation ( N = 13), radiation ( N = 20), and concurrent systemic therapy. Systemic therapy concurrent to RT was given to six patients and included temozolomide ( N = 4), carboplatine ( N = 1), or anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKI) ( N = 1). A median dose of 36 Gy was applied to the 34 recurrent sites. Local RT was applied to 15 patients, while five patients, received craniospinal irradiation for CNS relapse. After a median follow-up (FU) of 20 months (4-66), the estimated rate for local control, distant metastatic free survival, and overall survival at 3 years was 68.0%, 37.9%, and 61.6%, respectively. During RT, ten patients (50%) presented with a higher-grade acute hematologic adverse event. Late higher-grade sequelae included transient myelitis with transverse section ( N = 2) and secondary malignancy outside of the RT field ( N = 1)., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of RT/PBT for recurrent HR NB in a multimodality second-line approach. To better define the role of RT for these patients, prospective studies would be desirable.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Predictive Factors of Long-Term Survival after Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in High-Risk Breast Cancer.
- Author
-
Haussmann J, Budach W, Nestle-Krämling C, Wollandt S, Tamaskovics B, Corradini S, Bölke E, Krug D, Fehm T, Ruckhäberle E, Audretsch W, Jazmati D, and Matuschek C
- Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (naRT) in addition to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (naCT) has been used for locally advanced, inoperable breast cancer or to allow breast conserving surgery (BCS). Retrospective analyses suggest that naRT + naCT might result in an improvement in pathological complete response (pCR rate and disease-free survival). pCR is a surrogate parameter for improved event-free and overall survival (OS) and allows for the adaption of the post-neoadjuvant therapy regimens. However, it is not clear whether pCR achieved with the addition of naRT has the same prognostic value., Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective re-analysis of 356 patients (cT1-cT4/cN0-N+) treated with naRT and naCT with a long-term follow-up. Patients underwent naRT on the breast and regional lymph nodes combined with a boost to the primary tumor. Chemotherapy with different agents was given either sequentially or concomitantly to naRT. We used the Cox proportional hazard regression model to estimate the effect of pCR in our cohort in different subgroups as well as chemotherapy protocols. Clinical response markers correlating with OS were also analyzed., Results: For patients with median follow-ups of 20 years, 10 years, 15 years, 20 years, and 25 years, OS rates were 69.7%, 60.6%, 53.1%, and 45.1%, respectively. pCR was achieved in 31.1% of patients and associated with a significant improvement in OS (HR = 0.58; CI-95%: 0.41-0.80; p = 0.001). The prognostic impact of pCR was evident across breast cancer subtypes and chemotherapy regimens. Multivariate analysis showed that age, clinical tumor and nodal stage, chemotherapy, and pCR were prognostic for OS., Conclusion: NaCT and naRT prior to surgical resection achieve good long-term survival in high-risk breast cancer. pCR after naRT maintains its prognostic value in breast cancer subtypes and across different subgroups. pCR driven by naRT and naCT independently influences long-term survival.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Early Outcome, Cosmetic Result and Tolerability of an IOERT-Boost Prior to Adjuvant Whole-Breast Irradiation.
- Author
-
Jazmati D, Bölke E, Halfmann K, Tamaskovics B, Ruckhäberle E, Fehm T, Hoffmann J, Krug D, Nestle Krämling C, Corradini S, Budach W, Mohrmann S, Haussmann J, and Matuschek C
- Abstract
Background/Aims: Due to its favorable dose distribution and targeting of the region at highest risk of recurrence due to direct visualization of tumor bed, intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) is used as part of a breast-conserving treatment approach. The aim of this study was to analyze tumor control and survival, as well as the toxicity profile, and cosmetic outcomes in patients irradiated with an IOERT boost for breast cancer. Materials and Methods: 139 Patients treated at our institution between January 2010 and January 2015 with a single boost dose of 10 Gy to the tumor bed during breast-conserving surgery followed by whole-breast irradiation were retrospectively analyzed. Results: 139 patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 54 years (range 28−83 years). The preferred surgical strategy was segmental resection with sentinel lymphonodectomy (66.5%) or axillary dissection (23.1%). Regarding adjuvant radiotherapy, the vast majority received 5 × 1.8 Gy to 50.4 Gy. At a median follow-up of 33.6 months, recurrence-free and overall survival were 95.5% and 94.9%, respectively. No patient developed an in-field recurrence. Seven patients (5.0%) died during the follow-up period, including two patients due to disease recurrence (non-in-field). High-grade (CTCAE > 2) perioperative adverse events attributable to IOERT included wound healing disorder (N = 1) and hematoma (N = 1). High-grade late adverse events (LENT-SOMA grade III) were reported only in one patient with fat necrosis. Low-grade late adverse events (LENT-SOMA grade I-II) included pain (18.0%), edema (10.5%), fibrosis (21%), telangiectasia (4.5%) and pigmentation change (23.0%). The mean breast retraction assessment score was 1.66 (0−6). Both patients and specialists rated the cosmetic result “excellent/good” in 84.8% and 87.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study reports favorable data on the cosmetic outcome as well as the acute and early long-term tolerability for patients treated with an IOERT boost. Our oncologic control rates are comparable to the previous literature. However, prospective investigations on the role of IOERT in comparison to other boost procedures would be desirable.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Evaluation of dose, volume, and outcome in children with localized, intracranial ependymoma treated with proton therapy within the prospective KiProReg Study.
- Author
-
Peters S, Merta J, Schmidt L, Jazmati D, Kramer PH, Blase C, Tippelt S, Fleischhack G, Stock A, Bison B, Rutkowski S, Pietsch T, Kortmann RD, and Timmermann B
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Brain Neoplasms pathology, Ependymoma pathology, Ependymoma radiotherapy, Proton Therapy
- Abstract
Background: Radiotherapy (RT) of ependymoma in children is an important part of the interdisciplinary treatment concept. However, feasibility and dose concepts are still under investigation, particularly in very young children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the standard dose and volume of proton therapy (PT) in children with ependymoma., Methods: In this analysis, 105 patients with localized, intracranial ependymoma under the age of 18 years treated with PT between 2013 and 2018 were included. Patient characteristics, treatment, outcome, and follow-up data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis., Results: The median age of patients at PT was 2.8 years (0.9-17.0 years). The molecular subgroup analysis was performed in a subset of 50 patients (37 EP-PFA, 2 EP-PFB, 7 EP-RELA, 2 EP-YAP, 2 NEC [not elsewhere classified]). The median total dose was 59.4 Gy (54.0-62.0 Gy). The median follow-up time was 1.9 years. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 93.7%, 74.1%, and 55.6%, respectively. Within univariable analysis, female gender and lower dose had a positive impact on OS, whereas age ≥4 years had a negative impact on OS and PT given after progression had a negative impact on PFS. In the multivariable analysis, multiple tumor surgeries were associated with lower PFS. New ≥3° late toxicities occurred in 11 patients., Conclusion: For children with localized ependymoma, PT was effective and well tolerable. Multiple surgeries showed a negative impact on PFS., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Acute cardiac side effects after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: a case series.
- Author
-
Freise NF, Kivel M, Grebe O, Meyer C, Wafaisade B, Peiper M, Zeus T, Schmidt J, Neuwahl J, Jazmati D, Luedde T, Bölke E, Feldt T, Jensen BEO, Bode J, Keitel V, Haussmann J, Tamaskovics B, Budach W, Fischer JC, Knoefel WT, Schneider M, Gerber PA, Pedoto A, Häussinger D, van Griensven M, Rezazadeh A, Flaig Y, Kirchner J, Antoch G, Schelzig H, and Matuschek C
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Chest Pain, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pericarditis chemically induced, SARS-CoV-2 genetics, Vaccines, Synthetic adverse effects, Young Adult, BNT162 Vaccine adverse effects, COVID-19 prevention & control, Myocarditis chemically induced, Vaccination adverse effects, mRNA Vaccines adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 has been the main tool to contain the pandemic. The rush development of the 3 vaccines and their expedited approval have led to inoculation of millions of patients around the world, leading to a containment of the disease. Despite continuous viral mutations and the identification of weaker variants, the severity of the infections has been mild, with many patients being either asymptomatic or recovering at home. Currently the focus has shifted from the host of organ damage related to the infection to potential side effects of the vaccine. Myocarditis has been reported as one of the potential side effects from the mRNA vaccine, affecting young healthy individuals. Up to September 30, 2021, 1.243 cases of myocarditis after vaccination with BNT162b2 Comirnaty© were registered in young adults by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute in Germany alone. The exact pathophysiology and the risk factors for myocarditis following vaccination remain unclear. We present a case series of eight patients with cardiac symptom shortly after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination (BNT162b6, Biontech, Comirnaty© or mRNA-1237 Moderna, Spikevax©)., Patients and Methods: Eight patients between 13 and 56 years of age, vaccinated with either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 mRNA vaccine between January and August 2021 developed cardiac side effects shortly after either their first or second dose of the vaccine. Clinical data were retrieved from the clinical information system and analyzed. To support diagnosis of myocarditis or pericarditis, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed shortly after the onset of symptoms, with further investigations in severe cases. Symptoms were defined as dyspnea, chest pain and cardiac arrhythmia as determined by electrocardiography., Results: Eight patients (5 males and 3 females) developed cardiac symptoms compatible with myocarditis, according to the CDC criteria, shortly after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Three patients (2 males, 1 female) required hospitalization due to severe chest pain and elevated troponin levels. All patients recovered fully within 7 days from the symptom onset., Conclusions: Our data suggest that cardiac adverse events such as myocarditis or pericarditis shortly after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination are rare but possible and occur particularly in male patients., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Dosimetric feasibility of moderately hypofractionated/dose escalated radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer with intensity-modulated proton beam therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMPT) and impact of hydrogel prostate-rectum spacer.
- Author
-
Ahmad Khalil D, Jazmati D, Geismar D, Wulff J, Bäumer C, Kramer PH, Steinmeier T, Schulze Schleitthoff S, Plaude S, Bischoff M, Tschirdewahn S, Hadaschik B, and Timmermann B
- Subjects
- Feasibility Studies, Humans, Hydrogels, Male, Prostate pathology, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods, Rectum pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms radiotherapy, Proton Therapy
- Abstract
Purpose: To examine the dosimetric feasibility of hypofractionated/dose escalated radiation therapy in patients with localized prostate carcinoma using simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (SIB-IMPT) in absence or presence of prostate-rectum spacer., Methods: IMPT technique was implemented in 23 patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer treated at West German Proton Therapy Centre from March 2016 till June 2018, using SIB technique prescribing 60 GyRBE and 72 GyRBE in 30 fractions to PTV1 (prostate and seminal vesicle) and PTV2 boost (prostate and proximal seminal vesicle), respectively. In 15 patients, a transperineal injection of hydrogel was applied prior to radiotherapy to increase the distance between prostate and rectum. Planning and all treatments were performed with a 120 ml fluid-filled endorectal balloon customised daily for each patient. For each patient, 2 lateral IMPT beams were implemented taking a field-specific range uncertainty (RU) into account. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were analyzed for PTV2, PTV2 with range uncertainty margin (PTV2RU), rectum, bladder, right/left femoral heads, and penile bulb. For late rectal toxicities, the normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were calculated using different biological models. A DVH- and NTCP-based dosimetric comparison was carried out between non-spacer and spacer groups., Results: For the 23 patients, high-quality plans could be achieved for target volume and for other organs at risk (OARs). For PTV2, the V
107% was 0% and the Dmax did not exceed 106.2% of the prescribed dose. The volume PTV2RU covered by 95% of the dose ranged from 96.16 to 99.95%. The conformality index for PTV2RU was 1.12 ± 0.057 and the homogeneity index (HI) was 1.04 ± 0.014. Rectum Dmax and rectal volume receiving 73-50 Gy could be further reduced for the spacer-group. Significant reductions in mean and median rectal NTCPs (stenosis/necrosis, late rectal bleeding ≥ 2, and late rectal toxicities ≥ 3) were predicted for the spacer group in comparison to the non-spacer group., Conclusion: Hypofractionated/dose escalated radiotherapy with SIB-IMPT is dosimetrically feasible. Further reduction of the rectal volumes receiving high and medium dose levels (73-50 Gy) and rectal NTCP could be achieved through injection of spacers between rectum and prostate., (© 2022. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies in Breast Cancer.
- Author
-
Matuschek C, Jazmati D, Bölke E, Tamaskovics B, Corradini S, Budach W, Krug D, Mohrmann S, Ruckhäberle E, Fehm T, Nestle Krämling C, Dommach M, and Haussmann J
- Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy enables close monitoring of tumor response in patients with breast cancer. Being able to assess tumor response during treatment provides an opportunity to evaluate new therapeutic strategies. Thus, for triple-negative breast tumors, it was demonstrated that additional immunotherapy could improve prognosis compared with chemotherapy alone. Furthermore, adjuvant therapy can be escalated or de-escalated correspondingly. The CREATE-X trial randomly assigned HER2-negative patients with residual tumor after neoadjuvant therapy to either observation or capecitabine. In HER2-negative patients with positive BRCA testing, the OlympiA study randomly assigned patients to either observation or olaparib. HER2-positive patients without pathologic remission were randomly assigned to trastuzumab or trastuzumab-emtansine within the KATHERINE study. These studies were all able to show an improvement in oncologic outcome associated with the escalation of therapy in patients presenting with residual tumor after neoadjuvant treatment. On the other hand, this individualization of therapy may also offer the possibility to de-escalate treatment, and thereby reduce morbidity. Among WSG-ADAPT HER2+/HR-, HER2-positive patients achieved comparable results without chemotherapy after complete remission following neoadjuvant treatment. In summary, the concept of post-neoadjuvant therapy constitutes a great opportunity for individualized cancer treatment, potentially improving outcome. In this review, the most important trials of post-neoadjuvant therapy are compiled and discussed.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Low-dose radiation treatment for painful plantar enthesophyte: a highly effective therapy with little side effects.
- Author
-
Djiepmo F, Tamaskovics B, Bölke E, Peiper M, Haussmann J, Neuwahl J, Jazmati D, Maas K, Schmidt L, Gelzhäuser R, Schleich C, Corradini S, Orth K, van Griensven M, Rezazadeh A, Karimi K, Budach W, and Matuschek C
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heel Spur complications, Heel Spur diagnosis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain diagnosis, Prognosis, Radiography, Radiotherapy Dosage, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Heel Spur radiotherapy, Pain etiology, Pain Measurement methods
- Abstract
Aim: Plantar enthesophyte is a common degenerative disorder. Surgical and medical treatment options are associated with either poor outcome or high percentage of relapse. Observations have indicated a beneficial effect of radiation therapy. We therefore wanted to evaluate pain reduction using orthovolt or cobalt-based radiation treatment for painful plantar enthesophyte and determine long-term response as well as prognostic parameters in this condition., Methods: We identified a total of 102 consecutive patients treated for a total of 117 symptomatic heel spurs. 59 patients were treated with cobalt radiation, 31 patients with orthovolt therapy and 12 patients with both radiation systems. Primary outcome measure was pain reduction being scored using the modified Rowe Score prior therapy, at the end of each treatment series as well as after 6 weeks. Secondary outcome measure was long-term outcome, evaluated in patients with a follow-up period of longer than 3 years., Results: Before radiation therapy, 61 patients (60.4%) had a score of 0, significant strong pain. At the time of completion of radiation treatment, 3 patients (2.7%) were pain-free (score of 30), whereas 8 patients (7.9%) had still severe pain (score 0). 6 weeks after radiation therapy, 33 patients (32.7%) were pain-free and 8 patients (7.9%) had severe pain (score 0), while at the time data of collection, 74 patients (73%) were free of pain and 1 patient (1%) had strong pain (score 0). Duration of pain before the start of radiation treatment was a significant prognostic factor (p = 0.012) for response to treatment., Conclusion: Radiotherapy of painful plantar enthesophyte is a highly effective therapy with little side effects providing long-term therapeutic response. The only significant prognostic parameter for response to treatment is the duration of pre-radiation therapy pain. Early integration of radiation therapy in the treatment seems to result in superior pain reduction., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. PET/CT-based adaptive radiotherapy of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in multicenter yDEGRO ARO 2017-01 cohort study.
- Author
-
Mäurer M, Käsmann L, Fleischmann DF, Oertel M, Jazmati D, and Medenwald D
- Subjects
- Aged, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung mortality, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms mortality, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung radiotherapy, Lung Neoplasms radiotherapy, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
- Abstract
Background: Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a highly heterogeneous disease and treatment burden. Advances in imaging modality show promising results for radiotherapy planning. In this multicentric study, we evaluated the impact of PET/CT-based radiotherapy planning on the prognosis of patients with stage III NSCLC., Method and Patients: A retrospective observational cohort study (ARO 2017-01/NCT03055715) was conducted by the young DEGRO trial group of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) with the primary objective to assess the effect of tumour volume change during chemoradiotherapy and the secondary objective to assess the effect of treatment planning on survival. Three hundred forty-seven patients with stage III NSCLC treated at 21 university centers between January 2010 and December 2013 were enrolled in this trial. Patients received primary curative chemoradiotherapy with an intended dose of 50 Gy (hypofractionated) or > 60 Gy (normofractionated). To assess the effect of radiotherapy planning modality on overall survival, we used multivariate frailty models. Models were adjusted for gross tumor volume at the initiation of therapy, age, sex, simultaneous chemotherapy, lung comorbidities, RT dose and tumor grade. By considering the random effect, we can account for heterogeneity in survival and considered covariates within the model in relation to the study side., Results: Patients were predominantly male (n = 269, 78.4%) with mainly adenocarcinoma (56.4%) and an average of 67.2 years. Adaptation of radiotherapy with consecutive reduction of irradiation volume showed no significant disadvantage for patient survival (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.89-1.64). The use of PET/CT co-registration in radiation planning tended to result in better oncologic outcomes, although no significant association could be shown (HR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.56-1.16). Centers with a consistent planning strategy performed better than those without a preferred planning method (0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.94)., Conclusion: A consistent planning strategy has positive effects on overall survival. The use of PET/CT-based adaptive radiotherapy planning shows a similar survival prospect with the prospective of lower treatment volumes. In future research, toxicities need to be analysed in order to assess such reasoning., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Long-term follow-up of children with neuroblastoma receiving radiotherapy to metastatic lesions within the German Neuroblastoma Trials NB97 and NB 2004.
- Author
-
Jazmati D, Butzer S, Hero B, Doyen J, Ahmad Khalil D, Steinmeier T, Schulze Schleithoff S, Eggert A, Simon T, and Timmermann B
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Germany epidemiology, Humans, Infant, Male, Neoplasm Metastasis pathology, Neuroblastoma epidemiology, Neuroblastoma pathology, Treatment Outcome, Neoplasm Metastasis radiotherapy, Neuroblastoma radiotherapy
- Abstract
Purpose: Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid malignancy during childhood. Despite a multimodal treatment approach, the prognosis of patients with metastatic NB is not satisfactory. Although radiotherapy (RT) has become an integral part of treatment of the primary tumor, the role of RT in osteomedullary lesions is not well defined. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of RT for metastatic sites in children with high-risk NB., Methods: All patients with stage 4 NB from the prospective, multicenter NB trials NB97 and NB2004 who received RT to metastatic sites during frontline treatment were included in this retrospective analysis., Results: A total of 18 children were irradiated with a median dose of 36 Gray (Gy; range 20-45 Gy) to one or more (range 1-3) osteomedullary metastases with or without concomitant RT to the primary tumor site. The median follow-up time was 149 months (range 55-220) in survivors. At 5 years, local relapse-free survival (LRFS) at irradiated metastatic sites and metastases-free survival (MFS) at distant, non-irradiated site rates were 51.4 and 39.9%, respectively. The estimated overall survival (OS) rate at 5 years was 49.4%. No high-grade acute or late toxicity and no secondary malignancy was reported., Conclusion: RT to metastases is feasible for patients with stage 4 NB. However, an impact of RT to residual metastatic sites on outcome was not found. Studies with larger cohorts or prospective trials would be desirable in order to elucidate the role of RT for metastases., (© 2020. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Proton Beam Therapy for Children With Neuroblastoma: Experiences From the Prospective KiProReg Registry.
- Author
-
Jazmati D, Butzer S, Hero B, Ahmad Khalil D, Merta J, Bäumer C, Plum G, Fuchs J, Koerber F, Steinmeier T, Peters S, Doyen J, Thole T, Schmidt M, Blase C, Tippelt S, Eggert A, Schwarz R, Simon T, and Timmermann B
- Abstract
Objective: Radiotherapy (RT) is an integral part of the interdisciplinary treatment of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (NB). With the continuous improvements of outcome, the interest in local treatment strategies that reduce treatment-related side effects while achieving optimal oncological results is growing. Proton beam therapy (PBT) represents a promising alternative to conventional photon irradiation with regard to the reduction of treatment burden., Method: Retrospective analysis of children with high or intermediate risk NB receiving PBT of the primary tumor site during first-line therapy between 2015 and 2020 was performed. Data from the prospective in-house registry Standard Protonentherapie WPE - Kinder- (KiProReg) with respect to tumor control and treatment toxicity were analyzed. Adverse events were classified according to CTCAE Version 4 (V4.0) before, during, and after PBT., Results: In total, 44 patients (24 male, 20 female) with high (n = 39) or intermediate risk NB (n = 5) were included in the analysis. Median age was 3.4 years (range, 1.4-9.9 years). PBT doses ranged from 21.0 to 39.6 Gray (Gy) (median 36.0 Gy). Five patients received PBT to the MIBG-avid residual at the primary tumor site at time of PBT according to the NB-2004 protocol. In 39 patients radiation was given to the pre-operative tumor bed with or without an additional boost in case of residual tumor. After a median follow-up (FU) of 27.6 months, eight patients developed progression, either local recurrence (n = 1) or distant metastases (n = 7). Four patients died due to tumor progression. At three years, the estimated local control, distant metastatic free survival, progression free survival, and overall survival was 97.7, 84.1, 81.8, and 90.9%, respectively. During radiation, seven patients experienced higher-grade (CTCAE ≥ °3) hematologic toxicity. No other higher grade acute toxicity occurred. After PBT, one patient developed transient myelitis while receiving immunotherapy. No higher grade long-term toxicity was observed up to date., Conclusion: PBT was a well tolerated and effective local treatment in children with high and intermediate risk NB. The role of RT in an intensive multidisciplinary treatment regimen remains to be studied in the future in order to better define timing, doses, target volumes, and general need for RT in a particularly sensitive cohort of patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Jazmati, Butzer, Hero, Ahmad Khalil, Merta, Bäumer, Plum, Fuchs, Koerber, Steinmeier, Peters, Doyen, Thole, Schmidt, Blase, Tippelt, Eggert, Schwarz, Simon and Timmermann.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. In Reply to Gultekin and Yildiz.
- Author
-
Doyen J, Jazmati D, Geismar D, Frisch S, Schulze Schleithoff S, Vermeren X, Scheer M, Blasé C, Tippelt S, and Timmermann B
- Subjects
- Child, Chronic Disease, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Proton Therapy, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Embryonal
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Outcome and Patterns of Relapse in Childhood Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma Treated With Proton Beam Therapy.
- Author
-
Doyen J, Jazmati D, Geismar D, Frisch S, Schleithoff SS, Vermeren X, Scheer M, Blase C, Tippelt S, and Timmermann B
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Child, Child, Preschool, Disease-Free Survival, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Male, Meningeal Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Meningeal Neoplasms mortality, Meningeal Neoplasms surgery, Prognosis, Radiation Injuries pathology, Radiotherapy Dosage, Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Retrospective Studies, Rhabdomyosarcoma diagnostic imaging, Rhabdomyosarcoma mortality, Rhabdomyosarcoma surgery, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar diagnostic imaging, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar mortality, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar radiotherapy, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Alveolar surgery, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Meningeal Neoplasms radiotherapy, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local diagnostic imaging, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local mortality, Proton Therapy adverse effects, Rhabdomyosarcoma radiotherapy
- Abstract
Purpose: The standard of care of childhood parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma (pRMS) is chemotherapy and local radiation therapy. Protons are increasingly being used to decrease late effects. The aim of the present study is to analyze the pattern of relapse and the correlation with dosimetric factors in pRMS treated with proton therapy., Methods and Materials: This retrospective evaluation includes children treated in our institution for pRMS. Information on demographics, treatment, tumor characteristics, and toxicities and outcome was prospectively collected within the in-house registry. For patients presenting with local relapse, a fusion of the dosimetry with magnetic resonance imaging displaying site and geometry of recurrence was performed., Results: Median follow-up time was 2.9 years (0.5-4.7). Forty-six patients were identified in our institution between July 2013 and November 2017. Main characteristics of patients were as follows: 56.5% male, median age 5.1 years (1.3-17.5), 39.1% alveolar histology, 26.1%, 52.2%, 8.7%, and 13% patients with subgroup risk classification D, E/F/G, H, or metastatic, respectively, median total prescribed dose 55.8 Gy (50.4-56.4). Estimated 2-year local control, metastasis-free survival, event-free survival, and overall survival were 83.8%, 87.8%, 76.9%, and 88.9%, respectively. No acute or late local toxicity exceeding grade 3 was observed. Risk-group was identified as prognostic factor for metastasis-free survival in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis (trend: P = .09). In this cohort, dosimetric factors did not correlate with outcome. Isolated local failure happened in 5 of the 11 relapses. Local relapses were matched with dosimetry for 6 patients: 4 of them occurred in the high dose volume and 2 in the intermediate or low dose volume., Conclusions: Proton therapy was effective and well feasible even in a critical cohort. Still, local relapse within the target volume of the radiation therapy remains an important issue in pRMS and new treatment strategies are needed., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Neuropeptide Y as a possible homeostatic element for changes in cortical excitability induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.
- Author
-
Jazmati D, Neubacher U, and Funke K
- Subjects
- Action Potentials physiology, Animals, Cerebral Cortex chemistry, Interneurons chemistry, Interneurons metabolism, Learning physiology, Male, Neurons chemistry, Neurons metabolism, Neuropeptide Y analysis, Parvalbumins analysis, Parvalbumins metabolism, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Vesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 1 analysis, Vesicular Glutamate Transport Protein 1 metabolism, Cerebral Cortex metabolism, Cortical Excitability physiology, Homeostasis physiology, Neuropeptide Y biosynthesis, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation methods
- Abstract
Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is able to modify cortical excitability. Rat rTMS studies revealed a modulation of inhibitory systems, in particular that of the parvalbumin-expressing (PV+) interneurons, when using intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS)., Objective: The potential disinhibitory action of iTBS raises the questions of how neocortical circuits stabilize excitatory-inhibitory balance within a physiological range. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) appears to be one candidate., Methods: Analysis of cortical expression of PV, NPY and vesicular glutamate transporter type 1 (vGluT1) by immunohistochemical means at the level of cell counts, mean neuropil expression and single cell pre-/postsynaptic expression, with and without intraventricular NPY-injection., Results: Our results show that iTBS not only reduced the number of neurons with high-PV expression in a dose-dependent fashion, but also increased the cortical expression of NPY, discussed to reduce glutamatergic transmission, and this was further associated with a reduced vGluT1 expression, an indicator of glutamateric presynaptic activity. Interneurons showing a low-PV expression exhibit less presynaptic vGluT1 expression compared to those with a high-PV expression. Intraventricular application of NPY prior to iTBS prevented the iTBS-induced reduction in the number of high-PV neurons, the reduction in tissue vGluT1 level and that presynaptic to high-PV cells., Conclusions: We conclude that NPY, possibly via a global but also slow homeostatic control of glutamatergic transmission, modulates the strength and direction of the iTBS effects, likely preventing pathological imbalance of excitatory and inhibitory cortical activity but still allowing enough disinhibition beneficial for plastic changes as during learning., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Medical Students' Development of Ethical Judgment - Exploring the Learners' Perspectives using a mixed methods approach.
- Author
-
Langer T, Jazmati D, Jung O, Schulz C, and Schnell MW
- Subjects
- Humans, Morals, Schools, Medical, Ethics, Medical, Judgment, Students, Medical
- Abstract
Objective: Contemporary healthcare requires physicians to have well developed ethical judgment skills in addition to excellent clinical skills. However, no consensus has been reached on how to best teach ethical judgment skills during medical training. Previous studies revealed inconclusive results and applied varying theoretical frameworks. To date, the students' perspectives on their development in ethical judgment has received less attention. Better insights in the learners' experiences can help to improve educational interventions in medical ethics. Methods: A vignette featuring a challenging case with opposing views between a patient's parents and a physician followed by a questionnaire was presented to a cohort of medical students at a German medical school at three points in time during their medical training (Year 1, 2 and 5). The questionnaire included closed and open-ended questions addressing the participant's preferred, hypothetical actions, their reasoning as well as the resources informing their reasoning. Content analysis was used for qualitative data; frequencies and percentages were used to describe quantitative findings. Results: The response rate remained stable (28%) over the study period. Participants' responses changed overtime. Accepting parents' autonomy in the decision-making process was the majority standpoint of students in year 1 and 2 and became less often cited in year 5 (Year 1/2/5: 68/67/48%). On the contrary, not readily following the parents' decision for medical reasons was a minority standpoint in year 1 and became more prevalent over time (year 1/2/5: 12/17/42%). Judgments were only partly based on ethics training. Instead, participants drew on experiences from their clinical clerkships and their personal lives. Throughout the study, participants did not feel well-prepared to make a judgment in the case (Average 2.7 on a Likert-Scale; 1=very well prepared, 4=very poor). Conclusions: Over the course of their medical training, the participants seemed to increasingly frame the presented vignette as a medical problem. To optimize the development of ethical judgment teaching of ethics should be more integrated in clinical teaching. In addition to the analysis of rare and extreme cases, teaching ethics should also expand on challenges students and junior doctors commonly encounter themselves to promote ethical sensitivity and confidence in students.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. The dark matter of the cancer genome: aberrations in regulatory elements, untranslated regions, splice sites, non-coding RNA and synonymous mutations.
- Author
-
Diederichs S, Bartsch L, Berkmann JC, Fröse K, Heitmann J, Hoppe C, Iggena D, Jazmati D, Karschnia P, Linsenmeier M, Maulhardt T, Möhrmann L, Morstein J, Paffenholz SV, Röpenack P, Rückert T, Sandig L, Schell M, Steinmann A, Voss G, Wasmuth J, Weinberger ME, and Wullenkord R
- Subjects
- Animals, Humans, RNA Splicing, RNA, Untranslated, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Silent Mutation, Untranslated Regions, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Neoplasms genetics, Neoplasms pathology
- Abstract
Cancer is a disease of the genome caused by oncogene activation and tumor suppressor gene inhibition. Deep sequencing studies including large consortia such as TCGA and ICGC identified numerous tumor-specific mutations not only in protein-coding sequences but also in non-coding sequences. Although 98% of the genome is not translated into proteins, most studies have neglected the information hidden in this "dark matter" of the genome. Malignancy-driving mutations can occur in all genetic elements outside the coding region, namely in enhancer, silencer, insulator, and promoter as well as in 5'-UTR and 3'-UTR Intron or splice site mutations can alter the splicing pattern. Moreover, cancer genomes contain mutations within non-coding RNA, such as microRNA, lncRNA, and lincRNA A synonymous mutation changes the coding region in the DNA and RNA but not the protein sequence. Importantly, oncogenes such as TERT or miR-21 as well as tumor suppressor genes such as TP53/p53, APC, BRCA1, or RB1 can be affected by these alterations. In summary, coding-independent mutations can affect gene regulation from transcription, splicing, mRNA stability to translation, and hence, this largely neglected area needs functional studies to elucidate the mechanisms underlying tumorigenesis. This review will focus on the important role and novel mechanisms of these non-coding or allegedly silent mutations in tumorigenesis., (© 2016 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.