Search

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with unresectable, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN); induction chemotherapy (ICT) may provide survival benefits in some patients. This study aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of concomitant cetuximab plus radiotherapy (cet+RT) vs cisplatin plus radiotherapy (cis+RT) in patients with unresectable LA-SCCHN who were responsive to ICT.This randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial studied patients with unresectable LA-SCCHN who received 3 cycles of ICT (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil; TPF) followed by cis+RT (standard arm) or cet+RT (experimental arm). The primary endpoint was noninferiority of the experimental arm vs the standard arm in terms of overall survival (OS), based on a hazard ratio (HR) of lt; 1.3. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall response, safety, and quality of life (QOL).Between July 15, 2008, and July 5, 2013, 519 patients were recruited and started ICT; 407 patients received post-ICT treatment (cis+RT, n = 205; cet+RT, n = 202). At a median follow-up of 43.9 (cis+RT) and 41.1 (cet+RT) months, median OS was 63.6 and 42.9 months with cis+RT and cet+RT, respectively (HR [90% CI] = 1.106 [0.888-1.378], P =.4492). There were no differences in progression-free survival, overall response rates, or adverse event rates between groups. There was greater late neurotoxicity with cis+RT than cet+RT (P =.0058). Several QOL dimensions improved with cet+RT vs cis+RT (physical functioning, P =.0287; appetite loss, P =.0248; social contact, P =.0153).Noninferiority of cet+RT over cis+RT was not demonstrated.

Background Sorafenib is a potent targeted-therapy that blockades angiogenesis and has demonstrated activity against some sarcoma subtypes. Preclinical studies suggested that treatment with sorafenib plus cytotoxic agents could result in additive efficacy. Methods Patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with or without anthracycline pretreatment were included. Patients received oral sorafenib 400 mg twice daily starting on Day +2, ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2 iv infusion lasting 4 h on days 1, 2 and 3 with concurrent mesna 400 mg/m2 every three weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or up to a maximum of 6 cycles of ifosfamide (sorafenib could be continued until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity). Primary objective was progression-free rate (PFR) at 3 and 6 months; secondary objectives were overall response rate (ORR), Progression-free survival (PFS), Overall survival (OS) and safety. This article reports the phase II part of a phase I/II clinical trial. Results Thirty-five patients were enrolled. PFR at 3 and 6 months was 66% (95% CI 48–81) and 37% (95% CI 22–55). Six patients (17%) achieved partial response and 17 (49%) stable disease. Median PFS was 4.8 months (CI 95% 1.94–6.36) and overall survival 16.2 months (95% CI 8.75-NA). Conclusion Treatment with sorafenib plus ifosfamide achieved a significant clinical benefit with an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma resistant to anthracyclines, which warrants a more detailed study in randomized clinical trials.

The Ewing's sarcoma family of tumors (ESFT) comprises a number of rare malignant tumors. Standard first-line treatment for patients with these tumors includes chemotherapy with a five-drug regimen of vincristine, doxorubicin (Adriamycin®) and cyclophosphamide, alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide (VAC/IE). In cases of inadequate response, there are a number of second-line regimens available. However, further treatment options are required for those patients with disease unresponsive to standard treatment. Trabectedin is a novel treatment option for patients with ESFT. The present study reports the case of a Caucasian 69-year-old female patient who presented with a soft tissue mass on the chest wall that had developed 7 months earlier. A computed tomography scan revealed a 9×8×7-cm mass on the anterior chest wall above the pectoral muscle. Histopathological evaluations and molecular analysis indicated that it was consistent with a metastatic extraskeletal Ewing's sarcoma. The patient was treated with an alternating VAC/IE regimen; however, an inadequate response was observed. The patient received second-line treatment with a gemcitabine and dacarbazine combination regimen, but the disease progressed. Subsequently, treatment with trabectedin (1.5 mg/m2 as a 24-h continuous infusion every 3 weeks) was initiated. Trabectedin treatment resulted in long-lasting (18 months) progression-free survival. It is vital that novel drugs continue to being developed for patients with ESFT following progression subsequent to standard chemotherapy. The current report presents a case of a patient with metastatic, pre-treated Ewing's sarcoma achieving disease stabilization with trabectedin. Based on these results and the observed tolerability profile, trabectedin represents an alternative treatment for patients with ESFT. Further studies are required in order to determine the efficacy of trabectedin as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs. It is also important to identify which tumor subtypes, specific translocations and patient profiles will benefit the most from treatment with trabectedin.

Desmoid-type fibromatosis is a sarcoma subtype that gathers some singular characteristics, making it a difficult challenge to face in clinical practice. Despite its excellent survival prognosis, these tumors may be unpredictable, ranging from an asymptomatic indolent course to persistent, local, and extended recurrences that significantly impair quality of life. Although surgery was initially considered the first elective treatment, collected published data during the past few years are now pointing to the "wait and see" approach as a reasonable initial strategy because many patients can live a long life with the disease without having symptoms. When symptoms appear or there is a risk of functional impairment, a wide spectrum of therapies (local and systemic) can be useful in improving symptoms and controlling the disease. Because of the low incidence of desmoid-type fibromatosis, there is scarce scientific evidence supporting any specific treatment. Nonetheless, if volumetric responses are needed, chemotherapy may be a reasonable early option. However, if long-term control of disease is desirable, hormonal therapy, NSAIDs, and TKIs are the likely treatments of choice. Recent new findings in the biologic development of these tumors, such as the role of Wnt/β-catenin dependent pathway, have shown that the prognostic information provided by specific CTNNB1 gene mutations and other genetic profiles can lead to better methods of selecting patients as candidates for other approaches. Based on recent research, the Notch pathway inhibition in DF is one of the most promising potential targets to explore. As an orphan disease, it is mandatory that as many patients as possible be included in clinical trials.

11067 Background: GEIS 30 was a phase II study showing moderate activity of pazopanib in well-differentiated/dedifferentiated LPS (cohort A:37 pts, Progression free Survival (PFS) at 12 weeks (w) 43.2%) and no activity in Myxoid/round cell LPS (cohort B: 15 pts, PFS at 12w 13.3%). The present study aims to identify tumor and plasma biomarkers that are differently expressed in long responders (LRs) PFS > 24 w. Methods: Serum samples and paraffin-blocks at diagnosis were collected for 28 pts in cohort A and 11 in B. A total of 13 pts were LRs. Serum samples were obtained at baseline, after 3 w of treatment and at progression. A panel of 15 cytokines and growth factors were evaluated using Luminex technology (Millipore). Paraffin-blocks were evaluated for microvessel density (MVD) by CD31 immunostaining and Image Pro-Plus 7.0 Image Analysis System (Media-Cybernetics). For RNA expression analysis, the Oncology Biomarker Panel with probes for 2559 transcripts was used (HTG Molecular Diagnostics). Results: Serum cytokines showed that expression of angiopoietin (AGO) and BMP9 decreases during treatment, whereas GCSF increases. In addition, AGO and BMP overexpression at baseline was associated with worse prognosis in arm A (p = 0.09) and B (p = 0.01) respectively. No differences between study arms and outcome were appreciated by MVD. Gene expression revealed differences in some immunomodulators: PDL-1 was correlated with serum cytokines VEGFD (p = 0.04) and LEPTIN (p = 0.02); and PD-1 with VEGFD (p = 0.04), LEPTIN (p = 0.02), VEGFA (p = 0.02) and ANGIO (p = 0.03). PD1, in addition,was overexpressed in LRs (p = 0.05). Interestingly, three groups were identified in cohort A according to gene expression: Cluster 1, characterized by short-responder patients with the shortest overall survival, whereas cluster 3 (40% LRs) and 2 (63.6% LRs) showed longer survival rates (14.3%, 45.5% and 30% respectively) (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Gene expression profiling unveils three WD/DD-LPS biotypes according to their response to pazopanib, which could be potentially used to select pts for treatment

Carcinomas of unknown primary origin account for 3-5% of all malignancies. The current literature suggests that metastatic dissemination is able to occur in the absence of primary tumor growth. In metastatic disease that is difficult to diagnose, the origin usually remains unknown even after an exhaustive evaluation of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers. In the current study, a 49-year-old male presented with lymph nodes metastases of unknown origin. The exci- sional biopsy of an inguinal node revealed an adenocarcinoma growth pattern, but the IHC could not determine the primary origin. A gene profiling test was performed to complete the diagnosis and a salivary gland adenocarcinoma was diagnosed with 90% probability. Subsequently, the patient underwent appropriate chemotherapy for salivary gland adenocarcinoma, and exhibited an improved partial response. The present case study highlights the importance of an accurate diagnosis of the primary tumor and the use of all the current tools available in order to provide patients with the best treatment possible

Although thyroid cancer represents less than 1% of malignant tumours, its increased incidence detected in recent years and the appearance and development of new drugs targeting specific molecular targets has attracted the attention of the doctors involved in this pathology, especially medical oncologists. For this reason it is important at this critical point, when treatment may be substantially changed, to establish and agree updated guidelines. These guidelines should incorporate the newly developed strategies that, although still preliminary in evidence level, will surely have an important role, especially in relapsed and refractory tumours, which are unsuitable for surgical or radio-iodine treatment. Particular histological and molecular features of these tumours must be taken into account in order to optimise therapeutic approaches.

Aims and background The success of combined treatment in head and neck cancer resides largely in its completion, which can be compromised when the patient's general health status is precarious. The objective of this investigation was to study the role of comorbidity as a prognostic factor in a large, homogeneous population affected by locally advanced pharyngeal-laryngeal cancer, under a combined protocol treatment. The a priori hypothesis is that comorbidity strongly conditions overall survival and specific overall survival in these patients and can aid in the selection and individualization of treatments. Methods After a 24-month follow-up, a univariate and multivariate retrospective analysis of survival and prognostic factors was performed using 14 clinical, pathological and molecular variables including the comorbidity index calculated following the Picarillo method. The settings were the Otolaryngology, Oncology and Pathology Departments of the Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain, a referral center of the National Health System. Of the original 114 patients selected, 15 were withdrawn because the tumor spread to maxillofacial areas, or due to the lack of attendance at the clinic, incomplete clinical data or coexistent primary tumors. The group under analysis consisted of the 99 remaining patients affected by stage III and IV laryngeal and/or hypopharyngeal cancers that had not received previous treatments. The main outcomes to analyze were overall survival, specific overall survival and relative risk. Results Overall survival at 2.5 years was 68.1% (95% CI, 57.7–78.5). Specific overall survival at 2.5 years was 74.8% (95% CI, 64.9–84.6). In the multivariate analysis, tumor staging, neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and comorbidity (RR = 1.55 and 1.44 for overall and specific overall survival, respectively) present themselves as three prognostic factors independent of overall and specific overall survival. Conclusions The role of comorbidity as an independent prognostic factor in patients affected by laryngeal and/or hypopharyngeal cancer treated with chemo-radiotherapy should be taken into account in the tailoring of treatments and the improvement of therapeutic results.

e15603 Background: No globally accepted prognostic score has been developed in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The purpose of this study is to explore baseline host or tumor related prognostic factors in spanish AGC patients in first and second line chemotherapy treatment. In addition we compare our scores with previously published scores in asian and european population. Methods: A total of 166 patients with AGC treated in our institution between 2012 and 2016 were screened. 119 received first line chemotherapy (CT) and 47 of them also received second line CT and were included in the analysis. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazard model. We use as comparators four first line and three second line scores published in literature. Results: The overal survival (OS) in first line and second line patients were 9 and 5 months. To construct first line CT score we selected four risk factors: ECOG≥2, Her2 negative, Irinotecan based CT and albumin < 3,6mg/dl. OS were 23 months in low risk group, who had zero or one risk points, 15 months for patients in the moderate risk group, who had two or three risk points, and 5 months for patients in the high risk group, who had all four risk points. In the second line CT score we included four risk factors: ECOG ≥2, albumin < 3.6mg/dl, Hb < 11.5mg/dl and CA19.9 reduction less than 30% after 2 CT cycles. OS were 30 months in low risk group, who had zero or one risk points, 16 months for patients in the moderate risk group, who had two or three risk points, and 3 months for patients in the high risk group, who had all four risk points. Conclusions: In the present study, we propose two new prognostic scores for patients with AGC developed in the same cohort and including HER2 status. This prognostic model could help clinicians choose and applicable treatment based on the stimated prognosis. [Table: see text]

6001Background: CetRT has not been compared with CRT after ICT in phase III. Objective: To compare the impact on overall survival of CRT vs. CetRT after ICT in a Phase III randomized controlled cli...

11002Background: This is the first Spanish trial of Ewing sarcoma (ES) with the aim to reproduce the mP6 results and test the efficacy of the Gemcitabine/Docetaxel (G/D) regimen. Methods: Prospecti...

e17553Background: Sequential therapy with MKIs in the management of refractory thyroid cancer cannot be standardized with data coming form randomized clinical trials. Methods: We retrospectively an...

Although thyroid cancer usually has an excellent prognosis, few therapeutic options are available in the refractory setting. Based on the recent results of phase II studies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, we designed a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic thyroid cancer treated with sorafenib in seven Spanish referral centers. Consecutive patients with progressive metastatic thyroid cancer (papillary, follicular, medullary, and anaplastic) not suitable for curative surgery, radioactive-iodine therapy, or radiotherapy were treated with sorafenib 400 mg twice a day. The primary end point was objective response rate (RR). Secondary end points included toxicity, median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), and correlation between tumor marker levels (thyroglobulin, calcitonin, and carcinoembryonic antigen) and efficacy. Between June 2006 and January 2010, 34 patients were included in the study. Sixteen patients presented differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTC) of which seven (21%) were papillary, nine (26%) follicular, 15 (44%) medullary (MTC), and three (9%) were anaplastic (ATC). Eleven (32%) patients achieved partial response and 14 (41%) had stable disease beyond 6 months. Regarding histological subtype, RRs were 47% (seven of 15) for MTC, 19% (three of 16) for DTC, and 33% (one of three) for ATC. With a median follow-up of 11.5 months, mPFS were 13.5, 10.5, and 4.4 months for DTC, MTC, and ATC respectively. Tumor markers were evaluated in 22 patients, and a statistically significant association was observed between RR and decrease in tumor marker levels >50% (P=0.033). In this retrospective trial, sorafenib showed antitumor efficacy in all histological subtypes of thyroid cancer, warranting further development in this setting.

Aims and Background Brain metastases are an unusual finding in patients with colorectal carcinoma. We wished to determine the clinical presentation, the time interval between the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma and the appearance of brain metastases, and the overall survival. Patient characteristics The median age of our patients was 61 years. Brain metastases developed subsequently to the diagnosis of colorectal cancer in nine patients. All patients had neurologic symptoms. All patients had progressing systemic disease at the moment of intracranial presentation. Four patients received whole brain radiation therapy. The median survival was 11 weeks. Discussion The development of brain metastasis is a late event in the course of colorectal carcinoma and occurs most often in patients with extensive systemic disease that contraindi-cates surgical resection. Radiotherapy can improve the survival of this group of patients whereas the role of chemotherapy is still unclear due to the low frequency of such cases.

6037 Background: IC with docetaxel/cisplatin/fluorouracil (TPF) is superior to PF in organ preservation. Bioradiotherapy (BRT) is superior to RT alone in the loco-regional control of locally-advanc...

To assess the impact of different factors on response rate (RR), time to tumor progression (TTP), and overall survival time (OS) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS), included in three protocols with high-dose ifosfamide (HDIF).One hundred fifty six ASTS patients included in three consecutive phase II trials with HDIF (10 g/m(2)), alone or in combination with doxorubicin (DX), were analyzed. Cofactors were institution, trial, gender, age, performance status, histologic type, grade of malignancy, prior radiotherapy, presence of locoregional disease, metastatic site, salvage surgery, number of organs involved, and disease-free interval.By multivariate analysis performance status0 and lack of salvage surgery correlated with a poorer survival. A good-risk and a poor-risk group were identified, with median survival time (OS) of 29, 5, and 10 months, respectively (P = 0.00001). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS for 83 good-risk patients (either with PS = 0 or receiving salvage surgery) was 83, 44, and 29%, respectively, those figures being 37, 7, and 3% for 73 poor-risk patients.The design of randomized trials in ASTS including HDIF should consider those prognostic factors as stratification variables.

We have carefully read the letter ‘‘Comments to SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of thyroid cancer’’ sent on behalf of the Thyroid Cancer Committee from the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN). We greatly appreciate and welcome the interest shown by our colleagues in our guidelines [1] that, as the rest of the clinical SEOM guidelines in cancer, are specially focused on helping medical oncologists in management of different tumors from our field of expertise. All our guidelines are mainly designed in a brief, schematic and practical format, to be a useful clinical tool for the medical oncologist, which is a specialty focused on treatment. That is the reason why not every issue concerning each cancer subtype is covered. If this issue is not taken into account, these guidelines could be considered incomplete. We fully agree that thyroid cancer treatment should be performed necessarily in a multidisciplinary context. Since the development of our specialty, we think that medical oncologists’ contribution to multidisciplinary management of cancer has been crucial in Spain. That is the reason why we do not care leaving untouched topics. We are sure that no medical oncologist is going to work outside a multidisciplinary team, where undoubtedly all patients will be comprehensively evaluated. Regarding the first three critical considerations, we believe it is important to understand that our guide is aimed particularly, as we stated at the beginning of the article, to ‘‘incorporate the new developed strategies, that surely will have an important role especially in relapsed and refractory tumors, unsuitable for surgical or Radio-iodine treatment.’’ We would not claim our guidelines to be used as reference in the field of diagnosis or surgical treatment. These other issues have been widely covered by previous and more completes guidelines. We agree, obviously, that a radioactive iodide (RAI) thyroid scan should be performed in a suspected nodule prior to FNA to rule out a hyperfunctioning one, where surgery would not be necessary. We also agree that where we said ‘‘radiological signs of suspect’’, it would be more accurate to say ‘‘ultrasound signs of suspect’’. In relation to the third point, we agree that cytopathological interpretation of FNA samples in thyroid nodules is a critical issue, but it far exceeds the targets set in our guide. Considering the fourth comment about the indication of lobectomy in some unilateral tumors, we honestly believe that the critical consideration does not really sustain, since we clearly stated that thyroidectomy is the most common and recommended oncologic approach, and that lobectomy ‘‘can be considered’’ in exceptional cases (very low-risk patients). We also clearly pointed out that this issue is controversial. We do not think that we say anything different to what other guidelines say [2, 3]. Related to the last consideration about follow-up, we agree also that ultrasound plays a critical role in follow-up, J. Martinez Trufero (&) Servicio de Oncologia Medica, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain e-mail: jmtrufero@seom.org

4104 Background: SB remains since 2007 the only drug that improves overall survival (OS) of aHCC pts. Predicting early response to SB could save costs and toxicity. PET has never been properly test...