Search

Background: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is now recognized as the most prevalent form of secondary hypertension globally, contributing significantly to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This umbrella review aims to systematically compare cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in PA patients undergoing adrenalectomy versus mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment, aiming to inform optimal management strategies., Method: Following PRISMA guidelines, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/D386, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/JS9/D387, a comprehensive search strategy was employed across multiple databases. Meta-analyses focusing on cardiovascular outcomes or all-cause mortality, comparing adrenalectomy and MRAs treatment in PA patients, were included. Studies were independently screened and assessed for quality using AMSTAR 2, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/D388 and GRADE checklists., Results: A total of 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. Adrenalectomy showed potential benefits over MRAs in reducing the risk of arrhythmias (OR=2.17; 95% CI: 1.25-3.76) and major adverse cardiovascular events (OR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.33-2.46). Patients treated with MRAs exhibited a higher risk of cardiovascular events (OR=1.23; 95% CI: 1.05-1.44), hypertension (OR=3.22; 95% CI: 1.15-8.97), and all-cause mortality (OR=3.03; 95% CI: 1.36-6.70) compared to adrenalectomy., Conclusion: Adrenalectomy appears to offer favorable outcomes compared to MRAs treatment in PA patients, particularly in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. These findings suggest the importance of considering surgical intervention as a primary treatment modality for PA., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive outpatient procedure that has recently emerged as a treatment option for autonomous functioning thyroid nodules (AFTNs), offering a less invasive alternative to surgery. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of RFA for AFTNs., Method: Global databases of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from 1990 until January 5, 2024, for studies on AFTNs undergoing RFA that presented volume reduction ratio (VRR) for at least one of 1, 3, 6 or 12 months post-operative follow-up with the results presented as means. The primary outcomes were VRR and TSH normalization rate, and the secondary outcomes were the cosmetic score, symptom score, and post-procedure complications. Heterogeneity was assessed by Cochrane and I 2 statistics, and a random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024499932)., Results: A total of 10 eligible studies with a total sample size of 254 were included. The pooled VRR after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up post-treatment with RFA was 46.6% (95% CI: 40.3-52.9%), 62% (95% CI: 57.6-66.4%), 67.4% (95% CI:62.3-72.6%), and 77.2% (95% CI: 79.2-81.5%), respectively. The overall rate of TSH normalization was 76.4% (95% CI: 58.1-88.4%). Based on included studies the overall rate of subclinical hypothyroidism as one of the most important side effects of this method was 4% (95% CI: 1.9%-8.1%)., Conclusion: RFA emerges as a promising non-surgical treatment for AFTNs, showing high rates of TSH normalization, tumor size reduction, and improved cosmetic and symptom scores. However, further research is needed to compare RFA with surgical methods and assess long-term outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)