Search

• ASM pricing data from November 2013 to July 2023 was analyzed. • Average brand-name ASM prices increased from $8.71 to $15.43; generics decreased from $1.39 to $1.26. • Generic IR ASM formulations were 5728.99–7751.20 % cheaper than ER. • Each new generic labeler reduced generic prices by 5.45 % but brand-name prices increased by 2.46 %. • Share of brand-generic ASM pairs with a price difference over 10,000 % rose from 16.44 % to 20 % (2013–2016 to 2020–2023). The median cost of anti-seizure medications (ASM) in the United States (U.S.) nearly doubled per person between 2006 and 2021. This increase, combined with shifts in ASM usage and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on drug supply chains amid rising inflation, underscored the urgent need to scrutinize ASM pricing dynamics. This study aimed to analyze the complex dynamics of ASM pricing in the U.S. over the past decade (2013–2023); this included how the entry of generic ASMs influenced the pricing of brand-name counterparts and what impacted price variations across different ASM formulations (e.g., significant inflation, the COVID-19 pandemic). This study utilized National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) data from November 2013 to July 2023. We adjusted ASM prices for inflation using the Consumer Price Index for Medicinal Drugs - Seasonally Adjusted (CPI-MDS). Statistical analyses included fixed effects regressions and multivariable regression analysis to evaluate the impact of inflation, the number of medication labelers, and the COVID-19 pandemic on ASM prices. Our study analyzed 23 ASMs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which encompassed 223 oral formulations:112 brand-name and 111 generics. From 2013–2016 to 2020–2023, accounting for standard deviations (SD), the average price of brand-name ASMs increased from $8.71 (SD 5.9) to $15.43 (SD 10.7), while generic ASMs saw a slight decrease from $1.39 (SD 1.8) to $1.26 (SD 1.6). Consequently, the price gap between brand-name and generic ASMs surged from 1452.39 % to 3399.26 %. The proportion of matched brand-name and generic ASMs with a price difference of 1000 %–9999 % increased from 32.88 % (2013–2016) to 41.43 % (2020–2023), while those exceeding 10,000 % rose from 16.44 % to 20 % in the same period. Generic immediate-release (IR) formulations were significantly less expensive than extended-release (ER) or delayed-release (DR) counterparts, with cost differences reaching up to 7751.20 %. The number of medication labelers was inversely related to generic ASM prices, which decreased by 5.45 % (p = 0.001) with each additional generic labeler, while brand-name ASM prices increased by 2.46 % (p < 0.001) with each additional generic labeler. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a 24.4 % increase in brand-name ASM prices and a 23.1 % decrease in generic ASM prices. The findings reveal an expanding price disparity between brand-name and generic oral ASMs. An inverse relationship was observed between the number of medication labelers and generic ASM prices, with additional labelers driving down generic prices. However, introducing more generic labelers led to a significant increase in brand-name ASM prices. Furthermore, following patent expirations, brand-name ASM prices rose—a trend explained by the "generics paradox," where, contrary to expectations, brand prices do not decrease and may even increase when generics enter the market. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions in drug pricing policies to manage the rising costs associated with epilepsy treatment. To ensure equitable access to ASMs, stakeholders must understand and address the factors driving these pricing dynamics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Limited manufacturing facilities for parenteral antiseizure meds risk shortages. • India's antiseizure med production dominance risks supply chain. • Lack of data on medication supply chain highlights the need for better transparency. • Multi-medication manufacturing facilities pose bottleneck risks in the supply chain. Generic drug manufacturing has shifted away from the U.S. in the last few decades. The medication supply chain, from manufacturers to resellers, has become increasingly globalized and complex. This has led to bottlenecks in their manufacture resulting in medication shortages. Review of this process as it pertains to antiseizure medications (ASM) shows gaps in our comprehension of its complexities. Understanding these processes will be essential for preventing medication shortages. The aim of this research is to examine the generic ASM supply with an emphasis on production, labeling, and repackaging. Data from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Library of Medicine (NLM) website DailyMed was used to evaluate supply chain details to gather information on antiseizure medication formulations, manufacturing locations, and labeling. Out of 3142 ASM-related active National Drug Code (NDC-9) codes, 2663 NDC-9 codes with Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) status were included in the analysis. Most (94.8 %) were enteral, with only 5.2 % being parenteral (intravenous and intramuscular route). We identified the manufacturing country for 82 % of these codes, corresponding to 306 unique ANDA numbers. 119 manufacturing sites in 12 countries produce generic ASM Finished Dosage Forms (FDF): 103 for enteral and 21 for parenteral. India is the main producer of enteral ASM FDFs with 49 sites, followed by the US with 36. Regarding parenteral formulation, five countries had 21 unique manufacturing locations. 42 % of the 103 enteral ASM FDFs manufacturing sites produced multiple ASM FDFs, with one facility making eight distinct ASMs. 34.4 % of facilities were associated with over 3 ANDAs, and 15.1 % with more than 5. 22.7 % of ANDAs lacked a manufacturing facility identifier. Repackaged ASM FDFs constituted 48 % of NDC-9 s. Gabapentin and pregabalin were the most common oral ASMs. India is the major source for generic ASM FDFs manufacturing, leading to concerns about overall supply dependency on that country. There is a paucity of facilities for the global supply of parenteral ASM FDFs. There is missing data for many NDC-9 codes emphasizing urgency for transparency in the supply chain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Surgery was effective in a majority of children with epilepsy from a genetic cause. • Surgery improved seizure frequency despite diffuse or multifocal MRI or EEG findings. • Seizure freedom was achieved in ⅓ of this cohort; median follow-up 11 months. • >50 % seizure reduction was present in ⅔ of children; median follow-up of 11 months. • There is a long latency between recognizing drug resistance and referral for surgery. This study assesses current practices and outcomes of epilepsy surgery in children with a genetic etiology. It explores the pre-surgical workup, types of surgeries, and post-surgical outcomes in a broad array of disorders. Patients ≤18 years who completed epilepsy surgery and had a known genetic etiology prior to surgical intervention were extrapolated from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) surgery database, across 18 US centers. Data were assessed univariably by neuroimaging and EEG results, genetic group (structural gene, other gene, chromosomal), and curative intent. Outcomes were based on a modified International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) outcome score. Of 81 children with genetic epilepsy, 72 % had daily seizures when referred for surgery evaluation, which occurred a median of 2.2 years (IQR 0.3, 5.2) after developing drug resistance. Following surgery, 68 % of subjects had >50 % seizure reduction, with 33 % achieving seizure freedom [median follow-up 11 months (IQR 6, 17). Seizure freedom was most common in the monogenic structural group, but significant palliation was present across all groups. Presence of a single EEG focus was associated with a greater likelihood of seizure freedom (p=0.02). There are meaningful seizure reductions following epilepsy surgery in the majority of children with a genetic etiology, even in the absence of a single structural lesion and across a broad spectrum of genetic causes. These findings highlight the need for expedited referral for epilepsy surgery and support of a broadened view of which children may benefit from epilepsy surgery, even when the intent is palliative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Own voice perception might be a complex process including emotional, memory, somatosensory, auditory, and facial recognition processing. • Right superior temporal gyrus, transverse temporal gyrus, amygdala, hippocampus, and fusiform gyrus (FG) are likely part of the neural network subjacent to own human voice perception. • Cortico-cortical evoked potentials might help to understand neurophysiological bases of own voice perception. • Own voice perception seem to be related to facial perception as well. The neural bases for language perception have been studied elsewhere using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Direct Cortical Stimulation. However, to our knowledge, there is no previous report about a patient identifying the change in his voice tone, speed, and prosody because of right temporal cortical stimulation. Nor has there been a cortico-cortical evoked potential (CCEP) assessment of the network underlying this process. We present CCEP from a patient with right focal refractory temporal lobe epilepsy of tumoral etiology who reported changes in the perception of his own speech prosody during stimulation. This report will serve as a complement to the understanding of the neural networks of language and prosody. The present report shows that right superior temporal gyrus, transverse temporal gyrus, right amygdala, hippocampus, and fusiform gyrus (FG) are part of the neural network subjacent to own human voice perception. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the intracranial ictal onset and early spread patterns in pediatric patients with Temporal lobe epilepsy and its possible association with histopathology, temporal structure involved, mesial structural pathology, and possible implication in postsurgical outcome., Methods: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional study was carried out in a group of children from Children's Wisconsin between 2016 and 2022., Results: This study showed a strong association between ictal onset patterns and underlying histology (p < 0.05). Low-Frequency High Amplitude periodic spikes were seen only in patients with HS (20.6 %). A strong statistically significant association was found between different ictal onset patterns and the temporal lobe structure involved in the ictal onset (p < 0.001). Seizures with ictal onset consisting of Slow Potential Shift with superimposed Low Voltage Fast Activity arise from the Inferior Temporal Lobe or Middle Temporal Gyrus in a more significant proportion of seizures than those that originated from mesial temporal structures (Difference of proportion; p < 0.05). Low Voltage Fast Activity periodic spikes as an ictal pattern were seen in a patient with seizures arising outside the mesial temporal structure. The most frequent early spread pattern observed was Low Voltage Fast Activity (89.4 %); this pattern did not depend on the type of mesial structure pathology. Ictal onset patterns were associated with postsurgical outcomes (p < 0.001). The ictal onset pattern depends on the histopathology in the ictal onset zone and the temporal lobe structure involved in the ictal onset (p = 0.001)., Conclusions: Intracranial ictal onset patterns in TEMPORAL LOBE EPILEPSY depend on underlying histology and the temporal lobe structure involved in its onset., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Epilepsy surgery is an underutilized resource for children with drug-resistant epilepsy. Palliative and definitive surgical options can reduce seizure burden and improve quality of life. Palliative epilepsy surgery is often seen as a "last resort" compared to definitive surgical options. We compare patient characteristics between palliative and definitive epilepsy surgical patients and present palliative surgical outcomes from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium surgical database., Methods: The Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Epilepsy Surgery database is a prospective registry of patients aged 0-18 years undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery at 20 pediatric epilepsy centers. We included all children with completed surgical therapy characterized as definitive or palliative. Demographics, epilepsy type, age of onset, age at referral, etiology of epilepsy, treatment history, time-to-referral/evaluation, number of failed anti-seizure medications (ASMs), imaging results, type of surgery, and postoperative outcome were acquired., Results: Six hundred forty patients undergoing epilepsy surgery were identified. Patients undergoing palliative procedures were younger at seizure onset (median: 2.1 vs 4 years, P= 0.0008), failed more ASM trials before referral for presurgical evaluation (P=<0.0001), and had longer duration of epilepsy before referral for surgery (P=<0.0001). During presurgical evaluation, patients undergoing palliative surgery had shorter median duration of video-EEG data collected (P=0.007) but number of cases where ictal data were acquired was similar between groups. The most commonly performed palliative procedure was corpus callosotmy (31%), followed by lobectomy (21%) and neuromodulation (82% responsive neurostimulation vs 18% deep brain stimulation). Palliative patients were further categorized into traditionally palliative procedures vs traditionally definitive procedures. The majority of palliative patients had 50% reduction or better in seizure burden. Seizure free outcomes were significantly higher among those with traditional definitive surgeries, 41% (95% confidence interval: 26% to 57%) compared with traditional palliative surgeries and 9% (95% confidence interval: 2% to 17%). Rate of seizure freedom was 46% at 24 months or greater of follow-up in the traditional definitive group., Conclusions: Patients receiving palliative epilepsy surgery trialed more ASMs, were referred later after becoming drug resistant, and had longer gaps between drug resistance and epilepsy surgery compared with patients undergoing definitive epilepsy surgery. The extent of surgical evaluation is impacted if surgery is thought to be palliative. A majority of palliative surgery patients achieved >50% seizure reduction at follow-up, both in groups that received traditionally palliative and traditionally definitive surgical procedures. Palliative surgical patients can achieve greater seizure control and should be referred to an epilepsy surgery center promptly after failing two appropriate anti-seizure medications., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)