Search

Background/Objectives: Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes), formerly known as Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes), is an anaerobic, low-virulent bacterium that has been associated with postoperative infections of the shoulder, knee, and cervical spine. Recent studies have highlighted an association between C. acnes and the development of degenerative disc disease (DDD). The aim of this study is to ascertain whether C. acnes increases the risk of subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: After IRB approval, consecutive patients undergoing elective ACDF for DDD from 2017 to 2018 were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Intervertebral disc samples were taken at each affected level and cultured. A total of 66 patients with radiographic follow-ups were included in the final analysis. The extent of subsidence and cervical lordosis was determined immediately postoperatively and at the 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Results: No significant difference in subsidence was observed at 3 months (p = 0.07) or 6 months (p = 0.11) between culture-positive and -negative cohorts. Additionally, there was no significant difference detected in the change in cervical lordosis observed at 3 months (p = 0.16) or 6 months (p = 0.27) between culture-positive and -negative cohorts. For the most inferiorly fused segment, there was a significant difference in subsidence observed at 3 months (1.5 mm, 95% CI: 0.2–2.7 mm, p = 0.02) but not at 6 months (p = 0.17). Conclusions: Intervertebral discs with a positive C. acnes culture were not associated with greater levels of subsidence at 3 or 6 months following ACDF for DDD. Further research is necessary to endorse these results and to gauge the clinical significance of C. acnes infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeThere are over 500 medically related applications (apps) for mobile devices. Very few of these applications undergo testing and peer-review for accuracy. The purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of limb deformity measurements on the Bone Ninja app compared to PACS and to determine the intra- and inter-observer variability among different orthopaedic practitioners.MethodsFour participants (attending, senior and junior resident, and physician assistant) measured the leg length (LL), the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) of 48 limbs (24 patients), twice with both Bone Ninja and PACS. The difference between the measurements obtained with the Bone Ninja app and PACS were measured. We determined the consistency of the intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for both systems.ResultsThere were no statistical differences in leg length discrepancy (LLD), MPTA, or LDFA measurements between Bone Ninja and PACS (p = 0.96, 0.87, and 0.97, respectively). The intra-observer ICC for the LL, LDFA, and MPTA was similar between Bone Ninja and PACS (0.83, 0.89, and 0.96 vs. 0.96, 0.93, and 0.95, respectively). The inter-observer ICC was similar between Bone Ninja and PACS (0.95, 0.96, and 0.99 vs. 0.99, 0.98, and 0.98, respectively).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that Bone Ninja is an accurate educational tool for measuring LLD, LDFA, and MPTA. Both systems are reliable instruments for evaluating limb length differences and angles on standing radiographs for pre-operative deformity planning and education. This is the first study to evaluate the accuracy of Bone Ninja compared to the gold standard of PACS.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare the likelihood of missing a scheduled telemedicine and in-person appointments for spine patients. The secondary objective is to assess the impact of socioeconomic status on missed telemedicine and in-person appointments. Methods: Patients with scheduled outpatient appointments with orthopedic spine faculty between 2019 and 2021 were divided by appointment type: telemedicine (N = 4,387) and in-person (N = 3810). Socioeconomic status was assessed using Area Deprivation Index (ADI) stratified based on percentile: low (<25), medium (25–75), and high (>75) levels of socioeconomic disadvantage. The primary outcome measure was missed clinic appointments, which was defined as having at least one appointment that was cancelled or labeled "no show." Results: Patients with in-person appointments missed appointments more often than patients with telemedicine visits (51.3% vs 24.7%, P <.001). Patients with high ADI missed their in-person appointments more often than patients with medium and low ADI (59.5% vs 52.2% and 47.5%, P <.001). There was no difference in missed telemedicine visits between patients with high, medium, and low ADI (27.6% vs 24.8% vs 23.8%, P =.294). Patients that missed an appointment were 41.9% more likely to be high ADI (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.20–1.68, P <.001) and 13.4% more likely to be medium ADI (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03–1.26, P =.015) compared with low ADI patients. Conclusions: Telemedicine may serve a role in reducing disparity in appointment attendance. While further studies are needed to validate these findings, spine surgeons should consider offering telemedicine as an option to patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Limb-threatening lower extremity injuries often require secondary bone grafting after soft tissue reconstruction. We hypothesized that there would be fewer wound complications when performing secondary bone grafting via a remote surgical approach rather than direct flap elevation. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single Level 1 trauma center comparing complications after secondary bone grafting in patients who had undergone previous soft tissue reconstruction after open tibia fractures between 2006 and 2020. Comparing bone grafting via a remote surgical incision versus direct flap elevation, we evaluated wound dehiscence requiring return to the operating room as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were deep infection and delayed amputation. Results We identified 129 patients (mean age: 40 years, 82% male) with 159 secondary bone grafting procedures. Secondary bone grafting was performed via a remote surgical approach in 54% (n = 86) and direct flap elevation in 46% (n = 73) of cases. Wound dehiscence requiring return to the operating room occurred in one patient in the flap elevation group (1%) and none of the patients in the remote surgical approach. The odds of deep wound infection (OR, 1.77; p = 0.31) or amputation (OR, 1.43; p = 0.73) did not significantly differ between surgical approaches. No significant differences were found in complications between the reconstructive surgeon elevating and re-insetting the flap and the orthopaedic trauma surgeon performing the flap elevation and re-inset. Conclusion Direct flap elevation for secondary bone grafting after soft tissue reconstruction for open tibia fractures did not result in more complications than bone grafting via a remote surgical approach. These findings should reassure surgeons to allow other clinical factors to influence the surgical approach for bone grafting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]