Search

Background: Baseline characteristics could potentially guide asthma treatments. We evaluated whether baseline eosinophil levels affect the efficacy of mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium (MF/IND/GLY) in patients with inadequately controlled asthma., Method: In this post hoc analysis of IRIDIUM study, efficacy of high-dose MF/IND/GLY (160/150/50 μg, once-daily [o.d.]) versus high-dose MF/IND (320/150 μg o.d.) and high-dose fluticasone/salmeterol (FLU/SAL [500/50 μg, twice-daily [b.i.d.]); and efficacy of pooled MF/IND/GLY (160/150/50 μg and 80/150/50 μg) versus pooled MF/IND (320/150 μg and 160/150 μg) was evaluated in patient subgroups with baseline blood eosinophil count of <300 cells/μL or ≥300 cells/μL., Results: Overall, 3065 patients were included. At Week 26, high-dose MF/IND/GLY showed improved trough FEV 1 versus high-dose MF/IND (Δ78mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ54mL [≥300 cells/μL]) and FLU/SAL (Δ112mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ98mL [≥300 cells/μL]). Similarly, pooled MF/IND/GLY also showed improved trough FEV 1 versus pooled MF/IND (Δ75mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ68mL [≥300 cells/μL]). Over 52 weeks, high-dose MF/IND/GLY reduced the annualized rate of moderate or severe asthma exacerbations by 23% and 10%, severe exacerbations by 31% and 15%, and all exacerbation by 33% and 10% versus high-dose MF/IND for subgroups with <300 cells/μL and ≥300 cells/μL, respectively; and by 33% and 41%, 45% and 42%, 42% and 39% versus FLU/SAL, respectively. Similarly, pooled MF/IND/GLY reduced exacerbations by 22% and 8%, 21% and 7%, 27% and 8%, versus pooled MF/IND, for the respective subgroups., Conclusion: MF/IND/GLY showed improvement in lung function and reduction in asthma exacerbations over MF/IND and FLU/SAL independent of baseline eosinophil levels, indicating that eosinophil levels did not affect the efficacy of MF/IND/GLY in patients with inadequately controlled asthma., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02571777 (IRIDIUM)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Konstantinos Kostikas reports honoraria for presentations and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Chiesi, ELPEN, GILEAD, GSK, Menarini, Novartis, Sanofi, Specialty Therapeutics, WebMD (paid to the University of Ioannina), is a member of the GOLD Assembly and was an employee of Novartis Pharma AG until October 31, 2018; his department received funding and grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Innovis, ELPEN, GSK, Menarini, Novartis and NuvoAir (paid to the University of Ioannina). Jorge F. Maspero reports grants and personal fees from Novartis during the conduct of the study, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, and personal fees from AstraZeneca and ImmunoTek. Kenneth R. Chapman reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Takeda, grants from Vertex, and personal fees from CSL Behring, Inhibrx, and Kamada, all outside of the submitted work. Richard van Zyl-Smit reports personal fees from Aspen–GSK, AstraZeneca, Cipla, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, Glenmark and Boehringer Ingelheim outside of the submitted work. Karen Mezzi, Xavier Jaumont are employees of Novartis. David Lawrence is an employee as well as share owner of Novartis., (Copyright © 2023 Novartis Pharma AG. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a severe ocular allergic disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the cornea and conjunctiva that may lead to loss of visual acuity and blindness. The disease occurs primarily in children and is more common in geographical regions characterized by warm temperatures and high humidity. The clinical manifestations of VKC, when inadequately treated, may lead to severe complications and corneal damage. The prevalence of allergen sensitization, specific serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), and specific tear IgE was reported in approximately 55%-60% of patients with VKC, confirming the involvement of IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated mechanisms in the pathophysiology of the condition. This article explores current knowledge on the immunological pathways of VKC and the role of the monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, omalizumab, in its management. The review evaluated the effects of omalizumab beyond the direct IgE-mediated reactions and discusses its potential as a therapeutic target for VKC. Multiple retrospective analyses, case series, and case reports have reported the effectiveness of omalizumab in the management of VKC. A summary of the clinical data from these studies revealed that in children with VKC omalizumab treatment was well tolerated with improvement or resolution of ocular symptoms, reduction in steroid use, and enhancement of quality of life. Omalizumab may serve as a promising treatment option for VKC due to its ability to target both IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated pathophysiological pathways. Larger, controlled clinical trials are needed to support these findings., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Immunoglobulin E (IgE) plays a critical role in the allergen-initiated inflammatory pathway and thus serves as a viable therapeutic target in allergic or IgE-mediated diseases such as asthma. Omalizumab, an anti -IgE biologic, has been approved in the United States (US, 2003) and in the European Union (EU, 2005) as an add-on therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma and severe allergic asthma (SAA) aged 6 years and older. The dose and frequency of omalizumab are adjusted based on the patient's body weight and baseline IgE levels, as recommended by its dosing tables. Currently, these dosing recommendations are limited to patients with baseline IgE levels of up to 1500 IU/mL in the European Union and 700 IU/mL in the United States. However, many patients with SAA have IgE levels >1500 IU/mL, highlighting an unmet need. This review presents the current evidence on the treatment benefits of omalizumab in patients with IgE levels >1500 IU/mL. The findings from the reviewed studies which included >3000 patients support the efficacy and effectiveness of omalizumab in reducing exacerbations, and improving asthma control, lung function, and quality of life in patients with severe asthma having IgE levels beyond the current dosing range. Omalizumab was well-tolerated in these patients, with no new safety signals. In addition, high IgE levels (>1500 IU/mL) are also reported in several comorbidities of asthma (allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis [ABPA], food allergy, and nasal polyposis) and omalizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in these indications. These data suggest that omalizumab may be considered for administration in SAA patients, with high IgE levels outside the current dosing tables. A detailed assessment of patients with high IgE levels is needed before deciding on the optimal treatment approach. A management algorithm for SAA patients with IgE >1500 IU/mL is proposed in this review and a suggestion to follow the Delphi consensus is advised., (© 2023 Novartis Pharma AG, Basel.)

Background: A growing number of studies have shown encouraging results with omalizumab (OMA) as monotherapy and as an adjunct to oral immunotherapy (OMA+OIT) in patients with single/multiple food allergies., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of OMA or OMA+OIT in patients with immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy., Methods: An extensive literature search (inception to December 31, 2020) was performed to identify randomized, controlled, and observational studies that assessed OMA as monotherapy or OMA+OIT in patients with IgE-mediated food allergy. The outcomes were an increase in tolerated dose of foods, successful desensitization, sustained unresponsiveness, immunological biomarkers, severity of allergic reactions to food, quality of life (QoL), and safety. A P less than .05 was considered significant., Results: In total, 36 studies were included. The OMA monotherapy (vs pre-OMA) significantly increased the tolerated dose of multiple foods; increased the threshold of tolerated dose for milk, egg, wheat, and baked milk; improved QoL; and reduced food-induced allergic reactions (all P < .01). The OMA+OIT significantly increased the tolerated dose of multiple foods (vs placebo and pre-OMA), desensitization (vs placebo+OIT and pre-OMA) (all P ≤ .01), and improved QoL (vs pre-OMA) and immunoglobulin G4 levels (both P < .01). No major safety concerns were identified., Conclusions: In IgE-mediated food allergy, OMA can help patients consume multiple foods and allow for food dose escalation. As an adjunct to OIT, OMA can also support high-dose desensitization and higher maintenance doses. Further studies are warranted to empirically evaluate the effect of OMA and confirm these findings., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: An unmet clinical need exists in the management of treatment-refractory allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). Omalizumab has shown promising effects in case series and cohort studies; however, evidence to support its routine clinical use is lacking., Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in patients with ABPA., Methods: We conducted a systematic search across standard databases using specific key words until May 13, 2021. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness (exacerbations, oral corticosteroid [OCS] use, lung function, and patient-reported asthma control) and safety of pre- and post-omalizumab treatment. Subgroup analyses were performed for treatment duration and underlying disease., Results: In total, 49 studies (n = 267) were included in the qualitative synthesis and 14 case series (n = 186) in the quantitative meta-analysis. Omalizumab treatment significantly reduced the annualized exacerbation rate compared with pretreatment (mean difference, -2.09 [95% CI, -3.07 to -1.11]; P < .01). There was a reduction in OCS use (risk difference, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.46-0.84]; P < .01), an increase in termination of OCS use (risk difference, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.24-0.82]; P < .01), and a reduction in OCS dose (milligrams per day) (mean difference, -14.62 [95% CI, -19.86 to -9.39]; P < .01) in ABPA patients receiving omalizumab. Omalizumab improved FEV 1 % predicted by 11.9% (95% CI, 8.2-15.6; P < .01) and asthma control, and was well-tolerated., Conclusions: Omalizumab treatment reduced exacerbations and OCS use, improved lung function and asthma control in patients with ABPA, and was well-tolerated. The results highlight the potential role of omalizumab in the treatment of ABPA., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Autoimmune diseases have a prevalence of approximately 7 to 9% and are classified as either organ-specific diseases, including type I diabetes, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease and myasthenia gravis, or systemic diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and Sjögren's syndrome. While many advancements have been made in understanding of the mechanisms of autoimmune disease, including the nature of self-tolerance and its breakdown, there remain unmet needs in terms of effective and highly targeted treatments. T regulatory cells (Tregs) are key mediators of peripheral tolerance and are implicated in many autoimmune diseases, either as a result of reduced numbers or altered function. Tregs may be broadly divided into those generated in the thymus (tTregs) and those generated in the periphery (pTregs). Tregs target many different immune cell subsets and tissues to suppress excessive inflammation and to support tissue repair and homeostasis: there is a fine balance between Treg cell stability and the plasticity that is required to adjust Tregs' regulatory purposes to particular immune responses. The central role of immunoglobulin E (IgE) in allergic disease is well recognized, and it is becoming increasingly apparent that this immunoglobulin also has a wider role encompassing other diseases including autoimmune disease. Anti-IgE treatment restores the capacity of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) impaired by IgE- high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεR1) cross-linking to induce Tregs in vitro in atopic patients. The finding that anti-IgE therapy restores Treg cell homeostasis, and that this mechanism is associated with clinical improvement in asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria suggests that anti-IgE therapy may also have a potential role in the treatment of autoimmune diseases in which Tregs are involved., (© 2022 The Authors. Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Omalizumab is recommended as an add-on therapy in patients aged ≥6 years with inadequately controlled, moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma. The efficacy and safety of omalizumab treatment in allergic asthma clinical trials and its effectiveness in the real world have been reported in numerous studies. In this review, we examine clinical evidence in pediatric and adult patients with allergic asthma who received omalizumab treatment for at least 2 years, to assess its effectiveness, durability, and trajectory of response over time as well as safety. We performed a literature search from inception until March 2022 in PubMed using the keywords "omalizumab" and "allergic asthma" to retrieve articles examining the effects of omalizumab in patients with allergic asthma, aged ≥6 years. Only articles that evaluated the effectiveness of omalizumab for at least 2 years were included. Data from case reports were excluded. Our review confirmed the long-term effectiveness and safety of omalizumab, demonstrating reduced rate of exacerbations, improved lung function, asthma control, and quality of life, decreased health care resource utilization, and use of corticosteroids (oral/inhaled) with a favorable safety and tolerability profile for up to 9 years in adult patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. Similar results were also observed in the pediatric population with up to 7.5 years of omalizumab treatment. This review highlights and confirms the sustained clinical benefits of omalizumab over long periods of treatment in pediatric and adult populations with allergic asthma., (© 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of World Allergy Organization.)

Background: Assessment of clinical outcomes in the real-world corroborates findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs)., Objective: This meta-analysis evaluated real-world data of omalizumab on treatment response, lung function, exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), health care resource utilization (HCRU), and school/work absenteeism at 4, 6, and 12 months after treatment., Methods: Observational studies in patients with severe allergic asthma (≥6 years) treated with omalizumab for ≥16 weeks, published from January 2005 to October 2018, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. A random-effects model was used to assess heterogeneity., Results: In total, 86 publications were included. Global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) was good/excellent in 77% patients at 16 weeks (risk difference: 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.84; I 2  = 96%) and in 82% patients at 12 months (0.82, 0.73-0.91; 97%). The mean improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 160, 220, and 250 mL at 16 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively. There was a decrease in Asthma Control Questionnaire score at 16 weeks (-1.14), 6 months (-1.56), and 12 months (-1.13) after omalizumab therapy. Omalizumab significantly reduced annualized rate of severe exacerbations (risk ratio [RR]: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.30-0.56; I 2  = 96%), proportion of patients receiving OCS (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.47-0.75; I 2  = 96%), and number of unscheduled physician visits (mean difference: -2.34, 95% CI: -3.54 to -1.13; I 2  = 98%) at 12 months versus baseline., Conclusion: The consistent improvements in GETE, lung function, and PROs, and reductions in asthma exacerbations, OCS use, and HCRU with add-on omalizumab in real-life confirm and complement the efficacy data of RCTs., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immunoglobulin E (IgE) plays an essential role in many allergic diseases. This review highlights the role of IgE in atopic dermatitis (AD), a common, chronic, and complex skin inflammation, and the available therapeutic approaches that target IgE in AD. We examine the existing data showing the use of omalizumab, the only biologic anti-IgE therapy available in clinical use, plasma apheresis, and a combination of both therapeutic approaches for the treatment of AD. Existing data on the efficacy of omalizumab in AD are inconclusive. A limited number of randomised controlled studies, few uncontrolled prospective and retrospective reports, as well as multiple case series and case reports observed varying degrees of the efficacy of omalizumab in AD. Omalizumab displays a trend of higher efficacy in AD patients with low IgE levels compared with those with very high-to-extremely high serum IgE concentrations. Plasma apheresis and its combination with omalizumab show good efficacy, even in patients with unusually high serum IgE concentrations. Combining apheresis and anti-IgE treatment may serve as a comprehensive therapeutic approach for patients with elevated levels of IgE. Dedicated clinical studies with robust study designs are needed to establish the therapeutic efficacy of omalizumab in AD., Competing Interests: Andreas Wollenberg has received grants, personal fees or nonfinancial support from 10.13039/100006483Abbvie, Almirall, 10.13039/501100010558Beiersdorf, Bioderma, 10.13039/100010795Chugai, Galapagos, 10.13039/501100009754Galderma, Hans Karrer, Leo Pharma, Eli Lilly, L'Oreal, Maruho, 10.13039/501100004628MedImmune, 10.13039/100004336Novartis, 10.13039/100004319Pfizer, 10.13039/100013226Pierre Fabre, 10.13039/100009857Regeneron, 10.13039/501100004286Santen and Sanofi-Aventis. Jean-Philippe Lacour has received grants/research support as an investigator and honoraria, advisory board, or consulting fees from 10.13039/100006483AbbVie, BMS, 10.13039/100008349Boehringer Ingelheim, 10.13039/100006436Celgene, 10.13039/100013988Dermira, 10.13039/501100009754Galderma, Janssen, 10.13039/100004312Eli Lilly and Company, Leo-Pharma, 10.13039/100004334Merck, 10.13039/100004336Novartis, 10.13039/100009857Regeneron, 10.13039/100004337Roche, and 10.13039/100004339Sanofi. Simon Francis Thomsen has been a paid speaker, served on advisory boards and received research support from 10.13039/100006483Abbvie, Almirall, 10.13039/100006436Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Leo Pharma, 10.13039/100004336Novartis, 10.13039/100013226Pierre Fabre, 10.13039/100004337Roche, 10.13039/100004339Sanofi and 10.13039/100011110UCB. Xavier Jaumont and Slawomir Lazarewicz are permanent employees of Novartis Pharma AG., (© 2021 The Authors.)

Objective: Ligelizumab is a humanised IgG1 anti-IgE antibody that binds IgE with higher affinity than omalizumab. Ligelizumab had greater efficacy than omalizumab on inhaled and skin allergen provocation responses in mild allergic asthma. This multi-centre, randomised, double-blind study was designed to test ligelizumab in severe asthma patients not adequately controlled with high-dose inhaled corticoids plus long-acting β2-agonist., Methods: Patients received 16 weeks ligelizumab (240 mg q2w), omalizumab or placebo subcutaneously, and ACQ-7 was measured as primary outcome at Week 16. In addition, the study generated dose-ranging data of ligelizumab and safety data., Results: A total of 471 patients, age 47.4 ± 13.36 years, were included in the study. Treatment with ligelizumab did not significantly improve asthma control (ACQ-7) and exacerbation rates compared to omalizumab and placebo. Therefore, primary and secondary objectives of the study were not met. The compound was well tolerated, and the safety profile showed no new safety findings. Pharmacokinetic data demonstrated faster clearance and lower serum concentrations of ligelizumab than historical omalizumab data, and exploratory in vitro data showed differential IgE blocking properties relative to FcεRI and FcεRII/CD23 between the two compounds., Conclusion: Ligelizumab failed to demonstrate superiority over placebo or omalizumab. Although ligelizumab is more potent than omalizumab at inhibiting IgE binding to the high-affinity FcεRI, there is differential IgE blocking properties relative to FcεRI and FcεRII/CD23 between the two compounds. Therefore, the data suggest that different anti-IgE antibodies might be selectively efficacious for different IgE-mediated diseases., Competing Interests: JT has nothing to disclose. AG is an employee of Novartis. AP is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. HGZ is an employee of Novartis, during the conduct of the study. IB is an employee of Novartis Pharma AG. RW reports personal fees from Novartis Pharma AG, during the conduct of the study, and personal fees from Novartis Pharma AG, outside the submitted work. XJ is an employee of Novartis. CH has nothing to disclose. SZ reports grants and personal fees from bene‐Arzneimittel GmbH, grants and personal fees from Biotest GmbH, grants from Vifor Pharma Deutschland GmbH, grants from ALK Arzneimittel, personal fees from Novartis GmbH, personal fees from Böhringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Lofarma GmbH, personal fees from IMS HEALTH GmbH & Co. OHG, personal fees from GSK, personal fees from Stallergen, personal fees from Procter and Gamble, personal fees from Allergopharma GmbH, grants and personal fees from Allergy Therapeutics, personal fees from Engelhard Arzneimittel, personal fees from Sanofi‐Pasteur, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from EryDel, and personal fees from Bionorica GmbH, outside the submitted work., (© 2021 The Authors. Clinical & Translational Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian and New Zealand Society for Immunology, Inc.)

Background: Omalizumab has demonstrated efficacy as an add-on therapy in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. This post-hoc analysis assessed the potential predictors for the efficacy of omalizumab in these patients., Methods: A post-hoc analysis was performed on a Phase III, randomised, controlled study conducted in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe persistent allergic asthma (NCT01202903). We evaluated if levels of pre-treatment serum total immunoglobulin-E (IgE) and blood eosinophil (EOS), asthma severity, allergen profile, history of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR), and free IgE level during omalizumab treatment were predictive of omalizumab's efficacy., Results: This analysis included 608 patients (omalizumab, N = 306; placebo, N = 302). Improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ), standardized Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), and Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) scores with omalizumab treatment compared with placebo were observed in patients with baseline IgE levels ≥76 IU/mL (irrespective of the EOS count). Relatively greater improvements with omalizumab treatment was also noted in patients with both moderate or severe allergic asthma (regardless of asthma severity), and patients sensitised to >3 allergens and with a history of PAR. All patients who were treated with omalizumab achieved free IgE levels below 50 ng/mL by Week 1. Similar clinical outcomes were observed in the subset of patients who achieved free IgE levels of <25 and ≥ 25 ng/mL., Conclusions: In Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma, baseline IgE and allergen profile (number/PAR history) are potential predictors of treatment response to omalizumab., Trial Registration: NCT01202903 (www.clinicaltrials.gov)., Competing Interests: L. Wang, R. Fogel, X. Jaumont, and J. Yang are employees of Novartis. R. Fogel owns stock in Novartis. J. Li, C. Wang, C. Liu, J. Kang, L. Kong, Y. Huang, S. Liu, M. Huang, and N. Zhong have no competing interest to disclose., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Background: A Worldwide Antihistamine-Refractory Chronic Urticaria (CU) patient Evaluation (AWARE) is a non-interventional, multicenter study including patients from Europe, Central and Latin America, Asia-Pacific, and the Middle East. AWARE describes real-world evidence for CU, including clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and the impact on quality of life., Methods: Over the 2-year study, therapy changes, angioedema occurrence, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded over 9 visits, including dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and 7-day urticaria activity score (UAS7). Data were stratified into subgroups: chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU), or CSU + CIndU., Results: Out of 4838 patients analyzed, 9.9% were receiving no treatment for their CU symptoms at baseline, and 20.4% were receiving first-line non-sedating H 1 -antihistamine at approved doses. The predominant baseline therapy was up-dosed non-sedating H 1 -antihistamines (25.5%). By Visit 2, omalizumab was the overall most commonly used therapy (29.6%), increasing to 30.1% by the end of the study. Baseline DLQI scores for patients with CSU, CIndU and CSU + CIndU were 8.3, 7.6 and 9.1, respectively; scores decreased over the study for CSU and CSU + CIndU patients, but fluctuated for CIndU patients. Baseline angioedema occurrence was higher in CSU and CSU + CIndU patients, reported in 45.4% and 45.5% of patients, respectively, compared to 17.0% in CIndU patients. By the final visit, angioedema had decreased to 11.9% and 11.2% for CSU and CSU + CIndU, respectively, and 9.6% for CIndU., Conclusion: CU patients are undertreated at baseline; after entering the AWARE study, more patients received appropriate treatment. However, over two thirds are not escalated to third-line treatments., Competing Interests: M. Maurer has received grant/research support and/or honoraria for consulting or lectures from Aralez, Allakos, FAES, Genentech, Merckle Recordati, Moxie, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, MSD, UCB, Uriach. A. Giménez-Arnau has served as medical advisor for Uriach Pharma, Genentech, Novartis, FAES, GSK, Sanofi, and received research grants supported by Uriach Pharma, Novartis, Grants from Instituto Carlos III- FEDER and has been involved in educational activities for Uriach Pharma, Novartis, Genentech, Menarini, LEO Pharma, GSK, MSD, Almirall and Sanofi. LF Ensina has received advisory board, speaker and investigator fees from Novartis, and speaker fees from Takeda. C–Y Chu is a clinical trial investigator for Novartis and has received travel support, consulting fees and payment for lectures from Novartis. X. Jaumont and P. Tassinari are employees of Novartis., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Allergic asthma often coexists with different pathological conditions, called multimorbidities, that are mostly of allergic nature and share a common underlying inflammatory pathophysiological mechanism. Multimorbidities of allergic asthma may influence asthma control, its severity, and patients' response to treatment, and contribute to the overall socioeconomic burden of the disease. Immunoglobulin E (IgE) is known to play a central role in the pathogenesis of various allergic diseases, including asthma. Thus, IgE-mediated immunologic pathways present an attractive target for intervention in asthma and multimorbidities. In this review, we discuss the most frequently reported IgE-mediated multimorbidities in allergic asthma, including allergic rhinitis, rhinoconjunctivitis, atopic dermatitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, food allergies, and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Omalizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against IgE and has been in use to treat allergic asthma for more than a decade. We comprehensively review the clinical evidence for omalizumab in the treatment of the aforementioned multimorbidities in allergic asthma., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite remarkable advances in our understanding of asthma, there are still several unmet needs associated with the management of pediatric asthma., Methods: A two-day, face-to-face meeting was held in London, United Kingdom, on October 28 and 29, 2017, involving a group of international expert clinicians and scientists in asthma management to discuss the challenges and unmet needs that remain to be addressed in pediatric asthma., Results: These unmet needs include a lack of clinical efficacy and safety evidence, and limited availability of non-steroid-based alternative therapies in patients <6 years of age. An increased focus on children is needed in the context of clinical practice guidelines for asthma; current pediatric practice relies mostly on extrapolations from adult recommendations. Furthermore, no uniform definition of pediatric asthma exists, which hampers timely and robust diagnosis of the condition in affected patients., Conclusions: There is a need for a uniform definition of pediatric asthma, clearly distinguishable from adult asthma. Furthermore, guidelines which provide specific treatment recommendations for the management of pediatric asthma are also needed. Clinical trials and real-world evidence studies assessing anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) therapies and other monoclonal antibodies in children <6 years of age with asthma may provide further information regarding the most appropriate treatment options in these vulnerable patients. Early intervention with anti-IgE and non-steroid-based alternative therapies may delay disease progression, leading to improved clinical outcomes., (© 2018 The Authors. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)