Search

In the primary analysis of LYRA, daratumumab + cyclophosphamide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (DARA + CyBorD) was effective and well tolerated in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM). We report the final analysis of LYRA (median months of follow-up: NDMM, 35.7; RMM, 35.3) after all patients completed study therapy, were followed for 36 months, or discontinued. Patients received DARA + CyBorD induction, autologous stem cell transplant (if eligible), and 12 months of daratumumab maintenance. Eighty-seven NDMM patients enrolled, 39 underwent transplant, and 63 completed maintenance. Rates of complete response or better were 48.7% and 29.8% for NDMM transplant and NDMM non-transplant patients, respectively, and 36-month progression-free survival rates were 69.3% and 72.6%. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 61.6% of NDMM patients. Efficacy and safety data are also reported for the smaller RMM cohort (

Purpose: This phase 1/2 trial evaluates the novel immunotherapy BMS-986253 in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (NCT03400332). Interleukin-8 (IL-8) is an immunosuppressive chemokine often elevated in the serum of patients with cancer. High serum IL-8 concentration is associated with poor prognoses and resistance to immunotherapies, including anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) agents (Schalper et al. Nat Med 2020;26:688). The addition of anti-IL-8 therapy to anti-PD-1 nivolumab (NIVO) and anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab (IPI) may sensitize patients with high serum IL-8 levels to immune checkpoint inhibition. BMS-986253, a fully human IgG1 anti-IL-8 monoclonal antibody, in combination with NIVO ± IPI is under investigation in a phase 1/2 trial of patients with advanced solid tumors. Initial results from part 1 indicate BMS-986253 + NIVO was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities (Davar et al. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8. Abstract 394). Preliminary antitumor activity was observed, including partial responses in 5 of 28 patients with melanoma that had progressed on or after prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, a population with high unmet medical need. Part 2 is a randomized, double-blind phase 2 study comparing the efficacy of BMS-986253 in combination with NIVO + IPI vs NIVO + IPI in patients with advanced melanoma that progressed on or after prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Trial Design: Patients eligible for part 2 have histologically confirmed, unresectable, stage III/IV melanoma, have progressed on or after anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, had an anti-PD-(L)1 agent as their most recent therapy, and have not received anti-CTLA-4 treatment. PD-L1 and BRAFV600 mutation status (wild-type and BRAF mutations permitted) must be documented, and serum IL-8 levels will be measured at screening. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive BMS-986253 + NIVO + IPI or placebo + NIVO + IPI and stratified by serum IL-8 level, BRAF V600E status, and lactate dehydrogenase level. The dose and frequency of BMS-986253, NIVO, and IPI will be determined by part 1 data. Treatment with BMS-986253 or placebo and NIVO will continue ≤ 3 years or until disease progression or intolerance. The primary objective is to compare progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1 between treatment arms in patients with baseline serum IL-8 levels > 10 pg/mL. Secondary objectives include PFS by BICR in all randomized patients, overall response rates by BICR per RECIST v1.1, overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetic profile, immunogenicity of BMS-986253, and associations of baseline factors with response. Recruitment will continue until ≈170 patients are enrolled. Citation Format: Matteo Simonelli, Emiliano Calvo, Diwakar Davar, Jason Melear, Donald Richards, Matthew Dallos, Martin Gutierrez, Victor Moreno, Thomas Marron, Sylvie Rottey, Angela Orcurto, Susana Barriga, Jessy Fan, Elizabeth Gibson, Santanu Dutta, Vivek Arora, Ignacio Melero. A randomized, double-blind phase 2 evaluation of the anti-IL-8 monoclonal antibody BMS-986253 + nivolumab + ipilimumab vs nivolumab + ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma that progressed on/after anti-PD-(L)1 therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT119.

Introduction: Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel, chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) which targets a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen and has been glycoengineered to enhance affinity for all variants of FcγRIIIa receptors, demonstrating greater ADCC than rituximab and ofatumumab. In patients (pts) with rel/ref CLL, the combination of UTX with ibrutinib was well-tolerated and highly active demonstrating an 88% ORR (95% ORR in high-risk CLL) with responses attained rapidly (median time to iwCLL response of 8 weeks). Ibrutinib has demonstrated single agent activity in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), achieving a 68% ORR (21% CR) in a single arm trial in relapsed or refractory patients (Wang et al, NEJM 2013). Herein we report on the first combination of ibrutinib with a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, UTX, in patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL). Methods: Eligible patients had rel/ref MCL with an ECOG PS < 3. Prior ibrutinib treatment was permitted. UTX (900 mg) was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 in Cycle 1 followed by Day 1 of Cycles 2 - 6. Ibrutinib was started on Day 1 and continued daily at 560 mg. Following Cycle 6, patients came off study but could remain on ibrutinib. Primary endpoints were safety and ORR with an emphasis on early activity with response assessments by CT scan scheduled prior to cycles 3 and 6 only (criteria per Cheson 2007). Results: 15 patients were enrolled: 13 M/2 F, median age 71 yr (range 55-80), ECOG 0/1: 9/6, median prior Tx = 3 (range 1-8), 53% with ≥ 2 prior anti-CD20 therapies, 40% prior bortezomib. Gr 3/4 AE's occurring in at least 5% of patients and at least possibly related to UTX and/or ibrutinib included: neutropenia (13%), fatigue (7%), rash (7%) and atrial fibrillation (7%). Ibrutinib was dose reduced due to an AE in 1 patient (rash) and discontinued in 1 patient due to atrial fibrillation. No UTX dose reductions occurred. All 15 pts are evaluable for response with best response to treatment as follows: 87% (13/15) ORR with 33% (5/15) Complete Response. Three of the CR's occurred at week 8. Of the two patients not achieving an objective response, one patient was stable at first scan and came off treatment prior to second efficacy assessment (ibrutinib related A-Fib) and one patient progressed at first assessment. Responses generally improved from first to second assessment with median tumor reduction of 64% by week 8 and 82% by week 20. Conclusions: Ublituximab, a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, in combination with ibrutinib is both well-tolerated and highly active in pts with rel/ref MCL. Response rate, depth of response, and time to response compare favorably to historical data with ibrutinib alone. A randomized phase 3 trial with ibrutinib +/- ublituximab is currently ongoing in high-risk CLL pts and future studies using this combination in MCL are being evaluated. Disclosures Kolibaba: Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding. Burke:Gilead: Consultancy; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel expenses. Farber:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Fanning:Celgene and Millennium/Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Schreeder:TG Therapeutics, Inc: Research Funding. Boccia:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sharman:Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Calistoga: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding.