Search

We aimed to characterize the ocular phenotype of patients with ROSAH (Retinal dystrophy, Optic nerve edema, Splenomegaly, Anhidrosis, and Headache) syndrome and their response to therapy.Single-center observational case study SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS: Eleven patients with a diagnosis of ROSAH syndrome and mutation in ALPK1 were included.Patients with molecularly confirmed ROSAH syndrome underwent ophthalmic evaluation, including visual acuity testing, slit lamp and dilated exam, color fundus and autofluorescence imaging, fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography and electrophysiology.Visual acuity, electrophysiology, fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography.Eleven individuals (six females, five males) from seven families were included in this study ranging in age from 7.3- 60.2 years at the time of their initial evaluation. Six patients were followed for a mean of 2.9 years (range 0.33- 5.0 years). Best-corrected visual acuity at baseline ranged from 20/16 to no light perception. Variable signs or sequalae of intraocular inflammation were observed in nine patients including keratic precipitates, band keratopathy, trace to 2+ anterior chamber cells, cystoid macular edema and retinal vasculitis on fluorescein angiography. Ten patients were observed to have optic disc elevation and demonstrated peripapillary thickening on OCT. Seven patients had retinal degeneration consistent with a cone-rod dystrophy, with atrophy tending to involve the posterior pole and extending peripherally. One patient with normal electroretinogram and visual evoked potential was found to have decreased Arden ratio on electrooculogram.Leveraging insights from the largest single center ROSAH cohort described to date, this study identifies three main factors as contributing to changes in visual function of patients with ROSAH syndrome: optic nerve involvement, intra-ocular inflammation including cystoid macular edema, and retinal degeneration. More work is needed to determine how to arrest the progressive vision loss associated with ROSAH Syndrome.

Progressive corneal opacification can result from multiple etiologies, including corneal dystrophies or systemic and genetic diseases. We describe a novel syndrome featuring progressive epithelial and anterior stromal opacification in a brother and sister and their mildly affected father, with all three family members having sensorineural hearing loss and two also with tracheomalacia/laryngomalacia. All carried a 1.2 Mb deletion at chromosome 13q12.11, with no other noteworthy co-segregating variants identified on clinical exome or chromosomal microarray. RNAseq analysis from an affected corneal epithelial sample from the proband’s brother revealed downregulation of XPO4, IFT88, ZDHHC20, LATS2, SAP18, and EEF1AKMT1 within the microdeletion interval, with no notable effect on the expression of nearby genes. Pathway analysis showed upregulation of collagen metabolism and extracellular matrix (ECM) formation/maintenance, with no significantly down-regulated pathways. Analysis of overlapping deletions/variants demonstrated that deleterious variants in XPO4 were found in patients with laryngomalacia and sensorineural hearing loss, with the latter phenotype also being a feature of variants in the partially overlapping DFNB1 locus, yet none of these had reported corneal phenotypes. Together, these data define a novel microdeletion-associated syndromic progressive corneal opacification and suggest that a combination of genes within the microdeletion may contribute to ECM dysregulation leading to pathogenesis.

Background/Aims. Optic disc drusen (ODD) are calcified deposits of proteinaceous material in the optic disc, and their burden in ocular conditions is unknown. As ODD can be associated with visual field defects further compromising already degenerating visual function in patients with retinal degenerations, it is important to further our knowledge of ODD in inherited eye disease. The present study aims to evaluate prevalence, demographic features, and optic disc parameters of eyes with superficial ODD in inherited eye conditions. Materials and Methods. Electronic medical records of patients evaluated in the Ophthalmic Genetics clinic at the National Eye Institute (NEI) between 2008 and 2018 were searched for a superficial ODD diagnosis. Color fundus and autofluorescence images were reviewed to confirm ODD, supplemented with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in uncertain cases when available. Demographic information, examination, and genetic testing were reviewed. Disc areas and disc-to-macula distance to disc diameter ratios (DM : DD) were calculated. Results. Fifty six of 6207 patients had photographically confirmed ODD (0.9%). Drusen were predominantly bilateral (66%), with a female (62%) and Caucasian (73%) predilection. ODD prevalence in our cohort of patients with inherited retinal degenerations was 2.5%, and ODD were more prevalent in the rod-cone dystrophy subgroup at 2.95% (OR = 3.3 [2.1–5.3], P < 0.001 ) compared to the ophthalmic genetics cohort. Usher patients were more likely to have ODD (10/132, 7.6%, OR = 9.0 [4.3–17.7], P < 0.001 ) and had significantly smaller discs compared to the rest of our ODD cohort (disc area: P = 0.001 , DM : DD: P = 0.03 ). Discussion. While an association between ODD and retinitis pigmentosa has been reported, this study surveys a large cohort of patients with inherited eye conditions and finds the prevalence of superficial ODD is lower than that in the literature. Some subpopulations, such as rod-cone dystrophy and Usher syndrome, had a higher prevalence than the cohort as a whole.

Nanophthalmos is a rare condition defined by a small, structurally normal eye with resultant high hyperopia. While six genes have been implicated in this hereditary condition (MFRP, PRSS56, MYRF, TMEM98, CRB1,VMD2/BEST1), the relative contribution of these to nanophthalmos or to less severe high hyperopia (≥ + 5.50 spherical equivalent) has not been fully elucidated. We collected probands and families (n = 56) with high hyperopia or nanophthalmos (≤ 21.0 mm axial length). Of 53 families that passed quality control, plausible genetic diagnoses were identified in 10/53 (18.8%) by high-throughput panel or pooled exome sequencing. These include 1 TMEM98 family (1.9%), 5 MFRP families (9.4%), and 4 PRSS56 families (7.5%), with 4 additional families having single allelic hits in MFRP or PRSS56 (7.5%). A novel deleterious TMEM98 variant (NM_015544.3, c.602G>C, p.(Arg201Pro)) segregated with disease in 4 affected members of a family. Multiple novel missense and frameshift variants in MFRP and PRSS56 were identified. PRSS56 families were more likely to have choroidal folds than other solved families, while MFRP families were more likely to have retinal degeneration. Together, this study defines the prevalence of nanophthalmos gene variants in high hyperopia and nanophthalmos and indicates that a large fraction of cases remain outside of single gene coding sequences.

This paper presents findings of an experiment for the comparison of sugar concentration in extracted juice of fresh fruit to that of commercially-bottled 100% fruit juice with a “no sugar added” attribute. The goal of the study was to determine if the sugar content of bottled 100% fruit juice with a “no sugar added” label is equivalent to that of extracted juices of fresh fruits. The reported study was performed to address the potential concern that commercially-bottled 100% fruit juices with “no sugar added” may contain higher sugar content than extracted juice of fresh fruit. The fruit juices that were tested included apple, grapefruit, orange, pineapple, pomegranate, red grape and white grape. All bottled juices and fresh fruits were purchased in Toledo, Ohio, USA during the winter of 2012. The fresh fruits were juiced and three samples were tested for sugar concentration using a Brix refractometer. The same testing protocol was also applied to the bottled 100% fruit juice. Application of the Mann-Whitney test on the experimental data demonstrated no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). The results suggested that the sugar content in the commercially bottled 100% fruit juice with the “no sugar added” label is an accurate representation of sugar content in the freshly-extracted juice of the corresponding fruit.