Search

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic, inflammatory skin disease, affects approximately 7% of adolescents globally. A topical formulation of ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated safety and efficacy among adolescents/adults in two phase 3 studies (TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2). OBJECTIVE: To describe safety and efficacy of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle and long-term disease control of ruxolitinib cream among adolescents aged 12-17 years from pooled phase 3 study data. METHODS: Patients [≥ 12 years old with AD for ≥ 2 years, Investigators Global Assessment score (IGA) 2/3, and 3-20% affected body surface area (BSA) at baseline] were randomized 2:2:1 to ruxolitinib cream (0.75%/1.5%) or vehicle for 8 weeks of continuous use followed by a long-term safety (LTS) period up to 52 weeks with as-needed use. Patients originally applying vehicle were rerandomized 1:1 to 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream. Efficacy measures at week 8 included IGA treatment success (IGA-TS; i.e., score of 0/1 with ≥ 2 grade improvement from baseline), ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), and ≥ 4-point improvement in itch numerical rating scale (NRS4). Measures of disease control during the LTS period included IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and percentage affected BSA. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Of 1249 randomized patients, 245 (19.6%) were aged 12-17 years. Of these, 45 patients were randomized to vehicle and 92 patients to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream. A total of 104/137 (75.9%) patients continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in the LTS period [82/92 (89.1%) continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; 22/45 (48.9%) patients on vehicle were reassigned to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream], and 83/104 (79.8%) of these patients completed the LTS period. At week 8, substantially more patients who applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle achieved IGA-TS (50.6% versus 14.0%), EASI-75 (60.9% versus 34.9%), and NRS4 (52.1% versus 17.4%; P = 0.009). The mean (SD) reduction in itch NRS scores was significantly greater in patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle from day 2 [- 0.9 (1.9) versus -0.2 (1.4); P = 0.03]. During the LTS period, mean (SD) trough steady-state ruxolitinib plasma concentrations at weeks 12/52 were 27.2 (55.7)/15.5 (31.5) nM. The percentage of patients achieving IGA score of 0 or 1 was sustained or further increased with 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; mean affected BSA was generally low (< 3%; i.e., mild disease). Through 52 weeks, application site reactions occurred in 1.8% of adolescent patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream at any time; no patients had serious adverse events. There were no serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, or thromboembolic events. CONCLUSIONS: Meaningful anti-inflammatory and antipruritic effects were demonstrated with 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in the subset of adolescent patients with AD, comparable with those observed in the overall study population; long-term, as-needed use maintained disease control and was well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT03745638 (registered 19 November 2018) and NCT03745651 (registered 19 November 2018).

Introduction/objectives: JAK/STAT signaling inhibition exerts therapeutic effects on angiogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, whether the inhibitory effect differs among JAK inhibitors because of differing selectivity is unknown. Therefore, we compared the inhibitory effects of tofacitinib, baricitinib, peficitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib on angiogenesis. Method: RA-derived fibroblast-like synoviocytes (RA-FLS) were seeded on type I collagen gel, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were directly added. The control and aforementioned JAK inhibitors were added to the medium, followed by stimulation with interleukin (IL)-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R). Each JAK inhibitor's concentration was determined based on estimated blood concentrations. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentration was evaluated with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the medium from the first exchange. A migration assay was performed, and HUVEC migration was evaluated using CD31 fluorescence immunostaining. Results: Hematoxylin–eosin staining showed that compared with the non-JAKi treatment group, the JAKi treatment group markedly degenerated in the sub-lining and deep lining, with decreased lymphocyte infiltration and neovascularization [Rooney's score subscale, non-JAKi vs JAKi (median, 6.5 vs 2.5, p = 0.005)]. In vitro, IL-6 and sIL-6R administration increased VEGF production from RA-FLS and promoted neovascularization in HUVECs, and JAK-inhibitor administration, which decreased VEGF production from RA-FLS and suppressed HUVEC migration, inhibited neovascularization in RA-FLS and HUVEC co-cultures. Conclusions: The JAK inhibitors suppressed IL-6-induced angiogenesis via decreased VEGF production and HUVEC migration in RA-FLS and HUVEC co-cultures. No significant differences were observed among the JAK inhibitors, whose anti-angiogenic effect may be an important mechanism for RA treatment. Key Points • JAK inhibitors inhibit angiogenesis in RA by reducing VEGF production from RA-derived fibroblast-like synoviocytes. • Our study provides new insights into RA treatment by elucidating the anti-angiogenic effect of JAK inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] Systemic Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and dupilumab both have emerged as promising therapeutics for atopic dermatitis (AD). Dupilumab has a favorable safety profile, but oral JAKi therapy has been established in other diseases that carry potential comorbid susceptibilities that influence safety. We sought to provide real-world evidence of the comparative safety of oral JAKi versus dupilumab in patients with AD. The study used observational data from multiple healthcare organizations in the US. Patients with AD treated with either oral JAKi (upadacitinib, abrocitinib, and baricitinib) or dupilumab were enrolled. The 2 treatment groups were propensity score matched 1:1 on the basis of demographics, comorbidities, and prior medications. Safety outcomes within 2 years after the initiation of medications were measured by hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 14,716 patients were included, with 942 patients treated with oral JAKi and 13,774 with dupilumab. The 2 treatment groups respectively included 938 patients after matching. Treatment with oral JAKi was not associated with increased risks of mortality, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism, renal events, or serious gastrointestinal events. However, patients receiving oral JAKi showed significantly higher risks of skin and subcutaneous tissue infection (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.07-1.69), herpes infection (herpes simplex, HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.03-2.61; herpes zoster, HR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.14-5.52), acne (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.54-2.84), cytopenia (anemia, HR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.39-2.41; neutropenia, HR = 4.02, 95% CI = 1.91-8.47; thrombocytopenia, HR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.08-2.89), and hyperlipidemia (HR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.09-1.92); the risk of ophthalmic complications was higher in those receiving dupilumab (HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.03-2.17). Oral JAKi did not exhibit concerning safety issues in treating patients with AD but increased the risk of infections and abnormalities in laboratory findings. Long-term follow-up data are required to validate these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency that affects approximately 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis at some point in time in their lives. Outcomes of ASUC are highly variable. Approximately 30% of patients do not respond to corticosteroids and up to 50% of patients do not respond to rescue therapy (infliximab or cyclosporin) and require emergency colectomy. Data are emerging on infliximab dosing strategies, use of cyclosporin as a bridge to slower acting biologic agents and Janus kinase inhibition as primary and sequential therapy. In this review, we outline contemporary approaches to clinical management of ASUC in the setting of failure to respond to traditional rescue therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Rapid progress made in the management of atopic dermatitis (AD) in recent years and the differences in patient journey between Asian and non-Asian populations call for a review of current atopic dermatitis landscape in Asia. Methods: A roundtable meeting with nine regional dermatological experts was held in June 2023 to discuss the optimal management approaches for moderate-to-severe AD, focusing on the use of advanced therapies. Results: Disease burden on patients' quality of life, treatment adherence, and financial constraints were identified as major concerns when managing patients with moderate-to-severe AD in parts of Asia. It was agreed that the Hanifin and Rajka's criteria or the UK Working Party's Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis can be used to guide the clinical diagnosis of AD. Meanwhile, patient-reported outcome scales including the Dermatology Life Quality Index and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool can be used alongside depression monitoring scales to monitor treatment outcomes in patients with AD, allowing a better understanding for individualized treatment. When managing moderate-to-severe AD, phototherapy should be attempted after failure with topical treatments, followed by conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and, subsequently, biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors. Systemic corticosteroids can be used as short-term therapy for acute flares. Although these advanced treatments are known to be effective, physicians have to take into consideration safety concerns and limitations when prescribing these treatments. Conclusions: Treatments in AD have evolved and its management varies country by country. Unique challenges across Asian countries necessitate a different management approach in Asian patients with AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Children with severe atopic dermatitis (AD), refractory to conventional systemic treatment as well as single‐agent biologic and Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) such as abrocitinib, currently face a lack of treatment options. In response to this clinical conundrum, we present three cases of severe and refractory pediatric AD successfully managed with combined dupilumab and abrocitinib. These children had exhausted all conventional treatments and had undergone treatment with both dupilumab and abrocitinib individually, as well as dupilumab in conjunction with methotrexate. It was only when the combination of dupilumab and abrocitinib was introduced that they finally achieved noticeable and sustained improvements in disease control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Carcinoembryonic-antigen-related cell-adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) is an adhesion molecule that acts as a coinhibitory receptor in the immune system. We previously demonstrated that CEACAM1 is predominantly expressed on peripheral blood neutrophils in patients with RA. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) on cytokine-activated human neutrophils and CEACAM1 expression. Methods: Peripheral blood neutrophils were obtained from healthy subjects. Isolated neutrophils were stimulated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) or granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in the presence or absence of JAKi. The expression of CEACAM1 in peripheral blood neutrophils was analyzed by flow cytometry. Protein phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)1, STAT3, and STAT5 was assessed by western blot using phospho-specific antibodies. Results: We found that TNF-α-induced CEACAM1 expression was marginally suppressed after pretreatment with pan-JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib. Moreover, TNF-α induced STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation at the late stimulation phase (4 to 16 h). The expressions of CEACAM1 on neutrophils were markedly up-regulated by GM-CSF not by interleukin (IL)-6 stimulation. All JAKi inhibited GM-CSF-induced CEACAM1 expressions on neutrophils, however, the inhibitory effects of baricitinib were larger compared to those of tofacitinib or filgotinib. Moreover, CEACAM1 was marginally upregulated in interferon (IFN)-γ stimulated neutrophils. Similarly, JAKi inhibited IFN-γ-induced CEACAM1 expressions on neutrophils. Conclusions: We demonstrated that JAKi prevent GM-CSF-induced CEACAM1 expression in neutrophils, and JAKi-induced inhibition depends on their selectivity against JAK isoforms. These findings suggest that JAKi can modulate the expression of CEACAM1 in cytokine-activated neutrophils, thereby limiting their activation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Actualizar el consenso de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología (SER) sobre el uso de terapias biológicas y sintéticas dirigidas en la artritis reumatoide (AR) como medio de apoyo al clínico en sus decisiones terapéuticas. Se constituyó un panel de 13 expertos a través de convocatoria abierta en la SER. Se empleó una metodología mixta de adaptación-elaboración-actualización a partir del Documento de Consenso de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología sobre el uso de terapias biológicas en la AR publicado en 2015. Se partió de las revisiones sistemáticas (RS) de las recomendaciones de EULAR 2019, American College of Rheumatology 2021 y GUIPCAR 2017 y se actualizaron las estrategias de búsqueda de las preguntas PICO de GUIPCAR, elaborándose una RS adicional sobre enfermedad desmielinizante en relación con tratamientos biológicos y sintéticos dirigidos. Tras el análisis de la evidencia por los diferentes panelistas se consensuó en reunión presencial la redacción y el grado de acuerdo de cada una de las recomendaciones. El panel acordó 5 principios generales y 15 recomendaciones sobre el manejo de la AR. Estas incluyen aspectos como la importancia del tratamiento precoz, el objetivo terapéutico en la AR, la frecuencia de monitorización, el uso de glucocorticoides, la utilización de fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad (FAME) sintéticos convencionales (FAMEsc), FAME biológicos (FAMEb) y FAME sintéticos dirigidos, así como la reducción de dosis de estos fármacos en pacientes estables. Además, en esta actualización se incluyen recomendaciones sobre el uso de FAMEb e inhibidores de Janus-kinasas en algunas situaciones clínicas especiales, como pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar, antecedente de cáncer, insuficiencia cardiaca o enfermedad desmielinizante. Esta actualización aporta recomendaciones sobre aspectos clave en el manejo de la AR con terapias biológicas y sintéticas dirigidas. To update the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) regarding the use of targeted biological and synthetic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with the aim of assisting clinicians in their therapeutic decisions. A panel of 13 experts was assembled through an open call by SER. We employed a mixed adaptation-elaboration-update methodology starting from the 2015 Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on the use of biological therapies in RA. Starting with systematic reviews (SR) of recommendations from EULAR 2019, American College of Rheumatology 2021, and GUIPCAR 2017, we updated the search strategies for the PICO questions of GUIPCAR. An additional SR was conducted on demyelinating disease in relation to targeted biological and synthetic therapies. Following the analysis of evidence by different panelists, consensus on the wording and level of agreement for each recommendation was reached in a face-to-face meeting. The panel established 5 general principles and 15 recommendations on the management of RA. These encompassed crucial aspects such as the importance of early treatment, therapeutic goals in RA, monitoring frequency, the use of glucocorticoids, the application of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), biological DMARDs (bDMARDs), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Additionally, recommendations on dose reduction of these drugs in stable patients were included. This update also features recommendations on the use of bDMARDs and Janus Kinase inhibitors in some specific clinical situations, such as patients with lung disease, a history of cancer, heart failure, or demyelinating disease. This update provides recommendations on key aspects in the management of RA using targeted biological and synthetic therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are drugs that block tyrosine kinases responsible for transducing cytokine signals. The first JAKi was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011 to treat rheumatoid arthritis in adults. A pediatric indication was not approved until 8 years later, for acute graft‐versus‐host disease. Since then, topical and oral formulations have gained FDA approval for pediatric patients with dermatologic diseases. While increasing evidence supports the safety of these medications in adults, data are limited in children. We sought to determine whether JAKi adverse events (AEs) as reported in clinical trials and via postapproval pharmacovigilance services are comparable in adult and pediatric patients. Pharmacovigilance data were extracted from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System and the Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction Online Database for baricitinib, upadacitinib, abrocitinib, ruxolitinib, and tofacitinib. The pooled data were analyzed to detect the most common AEs for specific JAKi and for the drug class. We assessed 399,649 AEs from 133,216 adults and 2883 AEs from 955 patients under 18 years old and identified slightly different AE profiles for the two age groups. Both populations had increased risk for infections and gastrointestinal AEs. However, pediatric patients reported a higher proportion of blood and lymphatic disorders, while reports of nervous system and musculoskeletal/connective tissue disorders were more common in adults. The spectrum of AEs extracted from pharmacovigilance reports was similar to clinical trials. The JAKi AE profiles we observed may prove helpful in counseling patients and their parents before starting therapy and for monitoring once patients are on therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STING‐associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI) is caused by pathogenic gain‐of‐function variants in the gene TMEM173 (also named stimulator of interferon genes, STING1). This report details the case of an 11‐year‐old girl with SAVI who presented with skin‐limited symptoms and discusses the phenotype–genotype correlations of the TMEM173 variant present in our patient. Treatment of SAVI focuses on preventing the development or progression of organ damage by reducing systemic inflammation. We summarize the available treatments for this syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD), with its hallmark symptoms of pruritus and skin lesions, often impairs patients' quality of life. We assessed time spent with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch during upadacitinib treatment versus placebo or dupilumab among patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods: This analysis consisted of a post hoc analysis of Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), and Heads Up (NCT03738397). Measure Up 1 and 2 were replicate, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies with patients randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily oral upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo for 16 weeks. Heads Up was a head-to-head, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3b study with patients randomized (1:1) to upadacitinib 30 mg or subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg for 24 weeks. Skin clearance was assessed with the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at baseline, weeks 1, 2, and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Itch was assessed using the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) daily over 16 weeks and every 2 weeks thereafter to week 24 in Heads Up. Results: This analysis included 1683 patients in Measure Up 1 and 2 and 673 patients in Heads Up. Through 16 weeks in Measure Up 1 and 2, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 9.8–13.4 times as many days with an EASI 90 response and 7.0–10.3 times as many days with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus placebo. In Heads Up, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 2.0 and 1.7 times as many days through 16 and 24 weeks, respectively, with an EASI 90 response versus dupilumab. Through 16 and 24 weeks, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 3.0 and 2.6 times as many days, respectively, with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus dupilumab. Conclusions: Patients with moderate-to-severe AD spent more time with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch with upadacitinib versus placebo or dupilumab. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), Heads Up (NCT03738397). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To investigate the predictive factors for difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) and assess the efficacy of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted on data from the ANSWER cohort comprising 3623 RA patients treated with bDMARDs or JAKi in Japan. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to analyse the hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment retention. Results Of the 3623 RA patients, 450 (12.4%) met the first two criteria of the EULAR D2T RA definition (defined as D2T RA in this study). Factors contributing to D2T RA included age over 75 (compared with those under 65, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.69), higher rheumatoid factor (RF) titres (HR = 1.005; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.01), higher clinical disease activity index (HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03), lower methotrexate dosage (HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95, 0.99), and comorbidities like hypertension (HR = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.2, 1.95) and diabetes (HR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.73). Anti-IL-6 receptor antibodies (aIL-6R, HR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37, 0.75) and JAKi (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.90) were associated with fewer discontinuations due to ineffectiveness compared with TNF inhibitors. Oral glucocorticoid usage (HR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.47) was linked to increased discontinuation due to toxic adverse events. Conclusion Younger onset, higher RF titres, and comorbidities predicted D2T RA development. For managing D2T RA, aIL-6R and JAKi exhibited superior drug retention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a potentially life-threatening medical emergency that occurs in up to 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis. Although intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of therapy, 30–40% of patients will not respond and need timely consideration of rescue therapy with (currently) either infliximab or ciclosporin or indeed colectomy, underscoring the importance of multidisciplinary care to ensure favourable outcomes for patients. We discuss the current evidence and present an approach to the management of ASUC for general and specialist clinicians caring for patients with ASUC. Sources of data The information in this review is derived from data published in peer- reviewed academic journals and registered clinical trials. Areas of agreement Management of acute severe colitis requires a multidisciplinary approach with early initiation with steroids and timely escalation of treatment to either medical rescue therapy or surgery. Areas of controversy Balancing the risks of delayed surgery vs. optimizing medical therapy, including accelerated dosing schedules for biologics, remains ambiguous. Growing points The position on newer molecules like Janus Kinase inhibitors, such as tofacitinib, is a growing area with early real-world data showing promise for steroid refractory ASUC. Areas timely for developing research Developing predictive biomarkers and clinical risk scores for personalized rescue therapy selection is an evolving area of research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Guidelines for primary care clinicians on monitoring and safety guidelines regarding Janus kinase and tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory skin conditions are often unclear. This review aims to provide the primary care physician with a review of clinically relevant and updated information regarding the monitoring and overall profile of these medications. To do so, a systematic review was conducted using the PubMed database and relevant Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug inserts from manufacturers. Janus kinase and tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors have recently gained FDA approval for the treatment of several inflammatory skin conditions including atopic dermatitis, plaque psoriasis, alopecia areata, and vitiligo. There is a known box warning associated with the Janus kinase inhibitors that create the need for monitoring and close follow-up while patients are undergoing these treatments. Although these medications are often prescribed by specialists, as their use becomes more prevalent and therapies continue to gain approval for the treatment of these commonly encountered conditions, it is important for the primary physician to be updated and aware of the current monitoring guidelines and safety profile for this class of medication. Both Janus kinase inhibitors and tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitors display significant efficacy in the treatment of their approved conditions and research continues to move forward with the approval of more medications from these classes.

Abstract Objectives Carcinoembryonic-antigen-related cell-adhesion molecule 1 (CEACAM1) is an adhesion molecule that acts as a coinhibitory receptor in the immune system. We previously demonstrated that CEACAM1 is predominantly expressed on peripheral blood neutrophils in patients with RA. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) on cytokine-activated human neutrophils and CEACAM1 expression. Methods Peripheral blood neutrophils were obtained from healthy subjects. Isolated neutrophils were stimulated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) or granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in the presence or absence of JAKi. The expression of CEACAM1 in peripheral blood neutrophils was analyzed by flow cytometry. Protein phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)1, STAT3, and STAT5 was assessed by western blot using phospho-specific antibodies. Results We found that TNF-α-induced CEACAM1 expression was marginally suppressed after pretreatment with pan-JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib. Moreover, TNF-α induced STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation at the late stimulation phase (4 to 16 h). The expressions of CEACAM1 on neutrophils were markedly up-regulated by GM-CSF not by interleukin (IL)-6 stimulation. All JAKi inhibited GM-CSF-induced CEACAM1 expressions on neutrophils, however, the inhibitory effects of baricitinib were larger compared to those of tofacitinib or filgotinib. Moreover, CEACAM1 was marginally upregulated in interferon (IFN)-γ stimulated neutrophils. Similarly, JAKi inhibited IFN-γ-induced CEACAM1 expressions on neutrophils. Conclusions We demonstrated that JAKi prevent GM-CSF-induced CEACAM1 expression in neutrophils, and JAKi-induced inhibition depends on their selectivity against JAK isoforms. These findings suggest that JAKi can modulate the expression of CEACAM1 in cytokine-activated neutrophils, thereby limiting their activation.

Abstract Introduction Rapid progress made in the management of atopic dermatitis (AD) in recent years and the differences in patient journey between Asian and non-Asian populations call for a review of current atopic dermatitis landscape in Asia. Methods A roundtable meeting with nine regional dermatological experts was held in June 2023 to discuss the optimal management approaches for moderate-to-severe AD, focusing on the use of advanced therapies. Results Disease burden on patients’ quality of life, treatment adherence, and financial constraints were identified as major concerns when managing patients with moderate-to-severe AD in parts of Asia. It was agreed that the Hanifin and Rajka’s criteria or the UK Working Party’s Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis can be used to guide the clinical diagnosis of AD. Meanwhile, patient-reported outcome scales including the Dermatology Life Quality Index and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool can be used alongside depression monitoring scales to monitor treatment outcomes in patients with AD, allowing a better understanding for individualized treatment. When managing moderate-to-severe AD, phototherapy should be attempted after failure with topical treatments, followed by conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and, subsequently, biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors. Systemic corticosteroids can be used as short-term therapy for acute flares. Although these advanced treatments are known to be effective, physicians have to take into consideration safety concerns and limitations when prescribing these treatments. Conclusions Treatments in AD have evolved and its management varies country by country. Unique challenges across Asian countries necessitate a different management approach in Asian patients with AD.

Prurigo nodularis is a chronic skin condition which has significant negative impacts on the psychosocial function and quality of life of affected patients. It is a heterogeneous disease with complex underlying pathogenic mechanisms, and the clinical efficacy of traditional treatment options is often limited. Recently, great advances have been made in the pathogenesis of prurigo nodularis, which have enabled the development of novel targeted therapies for this disease. Various clinical trials have investigated the therapeutic efficacy of biologics which target the Th2 pathway. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin 4 (IL-4) receptor α, has shown clinical efficacy and obtained United States Food and Drug Administration approval for prurigo nodularis. In addition, nemolizumab (IL-31 receptor A antagonist) and vixarelimab (oncostatin M receptor β antagonist) have shown therapeutic efficacy in clinical trials for prurigo nodularis. Small-molecule inhibitors with clinical promise which are currently under investigation include nalbuphine (opioid receptor modulator), Janus kinase inhibitors, and aprepitant and serlopitant (neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists). The recent development of new biologics and small-molecule inhibitors targeting various immunological and neurological signaling pathways have provided great hope that we are entering a new era of targeted therapies for this challenging clinical condition. In addition, recent advances in RNA sequencing technology may enable the identification of unique signaling pathways and the development of novel treatments for this disease in the future. In this review article, we summarize the current knowledge of the pathogenesis of prurigo nodularis, and discuss recent advances in treatment for this challenging clinical condition.

Abstract Prurigo is a reactive, hyperplastic skin condition characterized by pruritic papules, plaques, and/or nodules. The temporal classification includes acute/subacute and chronic disease (≥ 6 weeks), with different clinical variants, synonymies, and underlying etiological factors. The immunology of chronic prurigo shows similarities with atopic dermatitis due to the involvement of IL-4 and IL-13, IL-22, and IL-31. Treatment includes antihistamines, topical steroids, dupilumab, and JAK inhibitors. Several conditions manifest clinically as prurigo-like lesions, and the correct clinical diagnosis must precede correct treatment. Furthermore, chronic prurigos represent a recalcitrant and distressing dermatosis, and at least 50% of these patients have atopic diathesis, the treatment of which may induce adverse effects, especially in the elderly. The quality of life is significantly compromised, and topical treatments are often unable to control symptoms and skin lesions. Systemic immunosuppressants, immunobiologicals, and JAK inhibitors, despite the cost and potential adverse effects, may be necessary to achieve clinical improvement and quality of life. This manuscript reviews the main types of prurigo, associated diseases, their immunological bases, diagnosis, and treatment.

Background: The advent of biologics and janus kinase inhibitors has revolutionized treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: To investigate preferences of patients with AD for attributes of currently approved systemic treatments and assess influencing factors. Methods: An online discrete choice experiment was conducted in patients with AD throughout Germany to analyze preferences for outcome (probability of (almost) clear skin at week 16, probability of significant itch improvement, time to onset of itch relief and type of side effects) and process attributes (application method and frequency of laboratory tests). Results: Participants (n=182, 75.3% female) considered side effects (Relative Importance Score (RIS): 31.2), (almost) clear skin (RIS: 24.2) and probability of itch improvement (RIS: 16.0) most important. Application method (RIS: 14.4), time to onset of itch relief (RIS: 7.4) and frequency of laboratory tests (RIS: 6.8) were less relevant. Preferences were significantly influenced by sex, age, psychiatric comorbidity, current therapy and health-related quality of life according to multivariate regression analysis. Conclusions: Participants attached great importance to safety and symptom control. However, preferences were also dependent on individual characteristics, underscoring the importance of personal counseling. Conjoined with medical considerations, patients’ preferences have fundamental impact on shared decisions for treatment of AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sarcoidosis and complications related to fillers have been reported following the COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, cutaneous sarcoidosis has been observed around polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) injection sites. Foreign-body reactions to PMMA can occur simultaneously with systemic sarcoidosis, suggesting a shared pathogenic mechanism between both conditions. To report a case of sarcoidosis and PMMA granulomas following COVID-19 vaccination (ChAdOx11), successfully treated with tofacitinib. We present a 59-year-old woman who developed systemic sarcoidosis and a granulomatous reaction to PMMA filler following the COVID-19 vaccination (ChAdOx11). Notably, both PMMA and the vaccine were potential triggers for sarcoidosis. Treatment with tofacitinib produced marked improvement in both the cutaneous and pulmonary involvement of sarcoidosis and the granulomatous reaction to PMMA. This successful outcome suggests tofacitinib, a pan-JAK inhibitor, an alternative treatment for cutaneous and systemic sarcoidosis, as well as a potential therapy for granulomatous complications of dermal fillers, such as PMMA.

Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IIRD) are more likely to develop herpes zoster (HZ) than individuals in the general population. Live attenuated vaccines and inactivated recombinant vaccines with adjuvant are available to prevent the disease and its complications. Live attenuated vaccine can be used in patients with IIRD if certain conditions are met, although these cannot always be fulfilled. The advantage of the inactivated recombinant adjuvant vaccine is that it can be used against a background of anti-rheumatic therapy. The review analyzes foreign studies on the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of recombinant adjuvant vaccine against HZ in patients with IIRD.

This review presents the latest data on the long-term use of the selective Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) baricitinib (BARI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in real-world clinical practice. The results of long-term use (up to 9.5 years) of BARI in RA suggest that its efficacy is comparable or even superior to that of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib, while the drug is more effective in patients who have not previously received bDMARDs or JAKi. It has been shown that the BARI dose can be reduced to 2 mg/day once the treatment goal has been reached in most patients without a decrease in efficacy, and that exacerbations that have occurred after reduction of the dosage (or treatment interruption) are relieved when returning to the full dose of the drug. According to data from registries from many countries and open observational studies, BARI is well tolerated during long-term use, even in elderly patients with ≥1 risk factor for cardiovascular disease. A high survival rate with BARI therapy has also been observed, which according to some registries exceeds that of tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors. Against the background of BARI therapy, a rapid (within 1 to 3 months) statistically significant reduction in pain has been demonstrated, regardless of the degree of suppression of disease activity, which correlates with an improvement in the functional status and general condition of patients. The possibility of suppressing the progression of structural damage in patients with RA was also demonstrated, allowing the choice of individualized tactics for the management of such patients.

Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) do not always allow to achieve remission and low inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), necessitating switching of therapy. Objective: to evaluate the clinical characteristics and features of pharmacotherapy in patients with RA requiring a switch from bDMARD/JAKi. Material and methods. The study group consisted of 103 patients with RA (85.4% women, mean age 46.9±13.7 years) who had persistent disease activity (DAS28-CRP – 5.42±0.9) despite treatment with bDMARD/JAKi or who experienced adverse events requiring therapy switching. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 – patients who underwent one switch (n=50), Group 2 – 2 switches (n=39), Group 3 – ≥3 switches (n=14) of bDMARD/JAKi therapy. Clinical manifestations, disease activity and pharmacotherapy were assessed. Results and discussion. The main reason for switching therapy was ineffectiveness of bDMARD/JAKi (in 81.6% of patients). There was a tendency towards higher DAS28-ESR (p=0.052) and DAS28-CRP values (p=0.057) in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1, as well as significant differences in CDAI (p1–2=0.015 and p1–3=0.011) and SDAI (p1–2=0.013 and p1–3=0.01). In group 3, there was a tendency towards higher DAS28-CRP, CDAI and SDAI values compared to group 2: 5.82±0.92 and 5.53±0.89; 40.5 [33.0; 45.0] and 35.2 [30.3; 43.9]; 36 [32; 42] and 32.0 [28.5; 38.5], respectively. However, these differences were statistically insignificant. Patients in groups 2 and 3 had a significantly higher number of painful joints compared to patients in group 1 (p1–2=0.048 and p1–3=0.036) and a significantly higher patient global assessment of disease activity (p1–2=0.004 and p1–3=0.013). Patients in group 3 took glucocorticoids significantly longer and at higher doses than patients in group 1. Tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors were used more frequently in groups 1 and 2 (50.0 and 41.0%, respectively), and interleukin-6 inhibitors in group 3 (50.0%). Conclusion. Patients with RA who required ≥2 switches of bDMARD/JAKi had higher disease activity compared to patients who required only one switch of therapy.

Small molecules, including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs), are promising new treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Small molecules exhibit more predictable pharmacokinetics than biologics, are less likely to induce immune responses, and can be administered orally. JAK inhibitors function by blocking the activity of JAK enzymes, which prevents the subsequent phosphorylation and activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins. Tofacitinib and filgotinib are approved for treating ulcerative colitis (UC), while upadacitinib is approved for UC and Crohn’s disease. Nevertheless, JAK inhibitors can increase the risk of herpes zoster, cancer, major adverse cardiovascular events, and venous thromboembolism. S1PRMs bind to S1PRs, particularly S1PR1, on lymphocytes. This interaction inhibits lymphocytes from exiting the lymph nodes and migrating to the gut, thereby reducing inflammation and the immune response in the intestinal mucosa. Ozanimod and etrasimod are S1PRMs approved for the treatment of UC, but they can cause side effects such as bradycardia, conduction disorder, and macular edema. Overall, JAK inhibitors and S1PRMs offer significant benefits in managing IBD, although their potential side effects require careful monitoring.

Abstract Introduction Atopic dermatitis (AD), with its hallmark symptoms of pruritus and skin lesions, often impairs patients’ quality of life. We assessed time spent with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch during upadacitinib treatment versus placebo or dupilumab among patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods This analysis consisted of a post hoc analysis of Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), and Heads Up (NCT03738397). Measure Up 1 and 2 were replicate, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies with patients randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily oral upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo for 16 weeks. Heads Up was a head-to-head, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3b study with patients randomized (1:1) to upadacitinib 30 mg or subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg for 24 weeks. Skin clearance was assessed with the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at baseline, weeks 1, 2, and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Itch was assessed using the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) daily over 16 weeks and every 2 weeks thereafter to week 24 in Heads Up. Results This analysis included 1683 patients in Measure Up 1 and 2 and 673 patients in Heads Up. Through 16 weeks in Measure Up 1 and 2, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 9.8–13.4 times as many days with an EASI 90 response and 7.0–10.3 times as many days with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus placebo. In Heads Up, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 2.0 and 1.7 times as many days through 16 and 24 weeks, respectively, with an EASI 90 response versus dupilumab. Through 16 and 24 weeks, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 3.0 and 2.6 times as many days, respectively, with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus dupilumab. Conclusions Patients with moderate-to-severe AD spent more time with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch with upadacitinib versus placebo or dupilumab. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), Heads Up (NCT03738397).

Abstract Objective To investigate the distribution and activation of B-cell subpopulations in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) and to analyze their correlation with disease remission. Methods Peripheral blood samples were collected from 23 adult healthy controls and 58 RA patients, 31 of whom were treated with JAKis and assessed during a 24-month follow-up. The number of peripheral B-cell subpopulations (including naive B cells, nonswitched memory B (NSMB) cells, switched memory B cells, and double-negative B cells), their activation, and phosphorylation of SYK and AKT upon B-cell receptor (BCR) stimulation in each population were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results Compared with that in healthy controls, the frequency of NSMB cells was significantly lower in new-onset untreated RA patients. However, expression of CD40, CD80, CD95, CD21low and pAKT significantly increased in these NSMB cells. Additionally, the number of NSMB cells correlated negatively with DAS28-ESR and IgG and IgA levels in these patients; expression of CD80, CD95 and CD21low on NSMB cells correlated positively with DAS28-ESR and IgG and IgA levels. After treatment with JAKis, the serum IgG concentration significantly decreased in RA patients in remission, but CD40, CD95 and pAKT levels in NSMB cells significantly decreased. Conclusion RA patients present different B-cell subpopulations, in which the frequency of NSMB cells is negatively associated with disease activity. However, treatment with JAKis can inhibit activation of NSMB cells, restore the balance of kinase phosphorylation, and facilitate disease remission in RA patients.

Abstract Introduction Early prediction of abrocitinib efficacy in atopic dermatitis (AD) could help identify candidates for an early dose increase. A predictive model determined week 12 efficacy based on week 4 responses in patients receiving abrocitinib 100 mg/day and assessed the effect of an abrocitinib dose increase on platelet counts. Methods Analysis included the phase 3 trials JADE MONO-1 (NCT03349060), MONO-2 (NCT03575871), COMPARE (NCT03720470), and TEEN (NCT03796676). For platelet counts and simulations, a phase 2 psoriasis trial (NCT02201524) and phase 2b (NCT02780167) and phase 3 (MONO-1, MONO-2, and REGIMEN (NCT03627767)) abrocitinib trials were pooled. A training-and-validation framework assessed potential predictors of response at week 4: score and score change from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), and Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS), and percentage change from baseline in EASI. The dependent variables at week 12 were ≥ 75% improvement in EASI (EASI-75) and IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline. The probability of each variable to predict week 12 EASI-75 and IGA responses was calculated. Results In the training cohort (n = 453), 72% of the ≥ 50% improvement in EASI (EASI-50) at week 4 responders and 16% of the nonresponders with abrocitinib 100 mg achieved EASI-75 at week 12; 48% and 6% of the week 4 EASI-50 responders and nonresponders, respectively, achieved week 12 IGA response. Similar results occurred with week 4 IGA = 2, ≥ 4-point improvement from baseline in PP-NRS, or EASI = 8 responders/nonresponders. Platelet counts after an abrocitinib dose increase from 100 to 200 mg were similar to those seen with continuous dosing with abrocitinib 100 mg or 200 mg. Conclusion Achieving week 4 clinical responses with abrocitinib 100 mg may be useful in predicting week 12 responses. Week 4 nonresponders may benefit from a dose increase to abrocitinib 200 mg, and those that receive this dose increase are likely to achieve treatment success at week 12, with no significant impact on platelet count recovery. Video abstract available for this article. Clinical Trial Registration NCT03349060, NCT03575871, NCT03720470, NCT03796676, NCT02201524, NCT02780167 and NCT03627767.

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory condition that poses significant therapeutic challenges. Emerging evidence suggests that topical Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors could represent a novel treatment paradigm for OLP. This review explores the pathophysiology of OLP, highlighting the role of the JAK-STAT pathway in its pathogenesis. We discuss the current landscape of topical JAK inhibitors, including their mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety profile. The review also examines recent clinical trials and observational studies that shed light on the potential of these agents in managing OLP. Finally, we provide a perspective on the future of JAK inhibitors in the context of OLP treatment, considering both their therapeutic potential and the need for further research.

Abstract Background A substantial proportion of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) relapse despite standard therapy with glucocorticoids, methotrexate and tocilizumab. The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signalling pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of GCA and JAK inhibitors (JAKi) could be a therapeutic alternative. We evaluated the effectiveness of JAKi in relapsing GCA patients in a real-world setting and reviewed available literature. Methods Retrospective analysis of GCA patients treated with JAKi for relapsing disease at thirteen centers in Spain and one center in United States (01/2017-12/2022). Outcomes assessed included clinical remission, complete remission and safety. Clinical remission was defined as the absence of GCA signs and symptoms regardless of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) values. Complete remission was defined as the absence of GCA signs and symptoms along with normal ESR and CRP values. A systematic literature search for other JAKi-treated GCA cases was conducted. Results Thirty-five patients (86% females, mean age 72.3) with relapsing GCA received JAKi therapy (baricitinib, n = 15; tofacitinib, n = 10; upadacitinib, n = 10). Before JAKi therapy, 22 (63%) patients had received conventional synthetic immunosuppressants (e.g., methotrexate), and 30 (86%) biologics (e.g., tocilizumab). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 11 (6-15.5) months, 20 (57%) patients achieved and maintained clinical remission, 16 (46%) patients achieved and maintained complete remission, and 15 (43%) patients discontinued the initial JAKi due to relapse (n = 11 [31%]) or serious adverse events (n = 4 [11%]). A literature search identified another 36 JAKi-treated GCA cases with clinical improvement reported for the majority of them. Conclusions This real-world analysis and literature review suggest that JAKi could be effective in GCA, including in patients failing established glucocorticoid-sparing therapies such as tocilizumab and methotrexate. A phase III randomized controlled trial of upadacitinib is currently ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03725202).

Herpes zoster (HZ) risk is increased in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) therapy. Identifying and evaluating the risk factors of HZ development in patients receiving JAKi therapy would be clinically helpful. We investigated HZ's incidence rates (IR), identified the risk factors, and further assessed their influence on HZ development in RA patients undergoing JAKi therapy. We retrospectively evaluated 249 RA patients who received JAKi therapy between 2015 and 2023. Data regarding clinical characteristics, HZ reactivation, HZ vaccination status, and concomitant medication use were collected. Among 249 JAKi-treated patients, 44 developed new-onset HZ (tofacitinib, 28/142; baricitinib, 6/35; upadacitinib,10/72), with an IR of 5.11/100patient-years. Multivariate analysis revealed significant predictors of HZ development: a long JAKi exposure period, prior HZ or COVID-19 history, and concomitant high-dose corticosteroids use. The interval between JAKi initiation and HZ development was significantly shorter in patients with prior HZ history than in those without (median, 6.5 months versus 33.5 months, p < 0.001), suggesting "biphasic" emergence of HZ. Only one patient who had experienced an HZ episode while receiving JAKi developed recurrent HZ. None of the seventeen patients immunized with the non-live recombinant zoster vaccine developed HZ. Our JAKi-treated patients had elevated HZ risks, a class effect across different JAKi. A long exposure period, prior history of HZ or COVID-19, and concomitant high-dose corticosteroid treatment may further increase the risk. The emergence of HZ shows a biphasic pattern: early HZ development in patients with prior HZ and late development in those without. Key Points • An increased risk of HZ was observed in Taiwanese RA patients treated with JAKi, presenting as a class effect. • Patients with a long JAKi exposure period, prior history of HZ or COVID-19, and concomitant use of high-dose corticosteroids were at high risk of HZ while receiving JAKi therapy. • The interval between JAKi initiation and HZ occurrence was shorter in patients with prior HZ than in those without, showing "biphasic" emergence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are immunomodulating and immunosuppressing medications utilized to treat atopic dermatitis (AD), psoriasis (PSO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and alopecia areata (AA). Special recommendations must be considered when prescribing vaccinations in this population, as the pneumococcal and herpes zoster vaccine are recommended to patients ≥ 19-years-old (rather than ≥ 65-years-old and ≥ 50-years-old as in the general population, respectively), along with a yearly influenza and up to date COVID-19 vaccination. Additionally, TNF-α and JAK-inhibitors may increase the risk of latent Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation among high-risk patients. Prior to prescribing these medications, a quantitative HepB Surface Antibody (HepB SA) test is performed to determine immunity. This study utilized the SlicerDicer function on EPIC Medical Records to search for any patient ≥ 19-years-old prescribed a biologic or JAK inhibitor for AD, PSO, PsA, or AA between 10/2003 and 10/2023 at a large tertiary institution. Vaccination rates among patients on biologics and JAK inhibitors were low, with rates being significantly lower in patients 19–64 years-old, compared to those ≥ 65 years-old for most disease states (p < 0.01). Among AD, PSO/PsA, and AA patients, on average, 9.39% were vaccinated for influenza, 6.76% for herpes zoster, 16.56% for pneumococcal pneumonia, and 63.98% for COVID-19. Only 3.16% of patients were adequately vaccinated for HepB after an abnormal HepB SA test. Here, extremely low rates of vaccination among patients on biologics and JAK inhibitors at our institution were highlighted, emphasizing the imperative need for ensuring vaccination in this group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis characterized by pruritic, scaly, erythematous lesions. Its incidence varies but is estimated to be approximately 20% in children and between 7 and 14% in adults, with variation amongst countries. It is a multifactorial condition, with a complex interplay between genetic, immunological, and environmental factors. Research into the inflammatory response has identified new therapeutic targets that work to reduce inflammation and subsequently reduce flares. This study explores existing therapeutic agents for atopic dermatitis as well as newer therapies such as biologics and small molecules, drawing upon each agent's mechanism of action, relevant landmark clinical trials, efficacy, and safety profile. Current therapies include emollients, corticosteroids, cyclosporine A, calcineurin inhibitors, phototherapy, and methotrexate. Biologics described include dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, and rocatinlimab. Small molecules inhibitors include Janus kinase inhibitors, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, transient receptor potential vanilloid subfamily V member 1 antagonist, and aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]