Search

Background: Multiportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (mVATS) is the standard approach for the surgical treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. However, uniportal VATS (uVATS) has emerged as an alternative aiming to minimize surgical morbidity. This study aims to strengthen the evidence on the safety and efficiency of uVATS compared to mVATS., Methods: From January 2004 to December 2020, records of patients who had undergone surgical treatment for primary or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax were evaluated for eligibility. Patients who had undergone pleurectomy combined with bullectomy or apical wedge resection via uVATS or mVATS were included. Surgical characteristics and postoperative data were compared between patients who had undergone surgery via uVATS or mVATS. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine whether the surgical approach was associated with any complication (primary outcome), major complications (i.e., Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3), recurrence, prolonged hospitalization or prolonged chest drainage duration (secondary outcomes)., Results: A total of 212 patients were enrolled. Patients treated via uVATS (n = 71) and mVATS (n = 141) were significantly different in pneumothorax type (secondary spontaneous; uVATS: 54 [76%], mVATS: 79 [56%]; p = 0.004). No significant differences were observed in (major) complications and recurrence rates between both groups. Multivariable analyses revealed that the surgical approach was no significant predictor for the primary or secondary outcomes., Conclusions: This study indicates that uVATS is non-inferior to mVATS in the surgical treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax regarding safety and efficiency, and thus the uVATS approach has the potential for further improvements in the perioperative surgical care for spontaneous pneumothorax., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Diverse cases of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) in the lung (pleural, endobronchial, and parenchymal) are presented while discussing the (preoperative) diagnostic challenges and treatment modalities. Other objectives include emphasizing the significance of gene rearrangements and highlighting the multidisciplinary approach in addressing IMTs., Methods: Four cases of IMT in the lung are presented, including a young adolescent girl with an ETV6-neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase 3 (NTRK3) gene rearrangement, a 5-year-old boy with challenging preoperative diagnosis, and 2 middle-aged women with respectively pleural and endobronchial tumors with one peribronchial relapse., Results: The cases demonstrate the diverse clinical presentations and diagnostic complexities associated with IMT in the lung. Surgical resection remains the primary treatment modality, with complete resection leading to a cure in most patients. Unfortunately, aggressive relapse can occur, as in our last case of an endobronchial tumor. Frozen section may confirm the presence of malignant cells perioperatively and impact further treatment. The presence of gene rearrangements, such as ETV6-NTRK3, suggests potential therapeutic implications., Conclusions: Early detection and complete surgical removal of IMT are crucial for effective treatment. Identifying gene rearrangements such as ETV6-NTRK3 holds promise for targeted therapies. Diagnostic challenges, including the controversy of biopsies and preoperative evaluations, underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. Anatomopathological recognition of IMT stays demanding. Close surveillance is necessary due to potential relapse, whereas frozen section perioperatively can help further treatment. This case series emphasizes the diagnostic challenges and therapeutic considerations for IMT in the lung., Competing Interests: The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Pectus carinatum is characterized by a protruding sternum. This deformity can be surgically corrected through the minimally invasive Abramson technique. In this procedure, a presternal metal correctional bar, secured to rib-attached stabilizers, is implanted to redress the sternum to a neutral position. To anticipate the intended position of the sternum, manual compression is applied over the sternal deformity. We describe a modified version of the Abramson procedure, encompassing a table-mounted PectusAssist™ System which generates a constant mechanical compression over the protruding sternum. The PectusAssist™ System, most importantly, eliminates the necessity of manually applying repetitive pressure on the deformity, and therefore maintains a more stable sternal position. This will ensure accuracy of the template used to bend the bar into its desired configuration. The modification we propose also simplifies presternal tunnel creation as the two bilateral retromuscular tunnels, that need to be connected presternally, are potentially better aligned due to a more stable and reduced position of the sternum. The PectusAssist™ System makes the procedure less labor intensive and reduces variability without interfering with the safety of the procedure. Therefore, we advise standard use of the PectusAssist™ System during minimally invasive repair of pectus carinatum by the Abramson procedure., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-23-642/coif). The series “Minimally Invasive Treatment of Pectus Deformities” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. HGLW is a consultant for Thompson Surgical Instruments. ERdL and JHTD served as unpaid Guest Editors of the series. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital anterior chest wall deformity. Currently, a wide variety of diagnostic protocols and criteria for corrective surgery are being used. Their use is predominantly based on local preferences and experience. To date, no guideline is available, introducing heterogeneity of care as observed in current daily practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate consensus and controversies regarding the diagnostic protocol, indications for surgical correction, and postoperative evaluation of pectus excavatum., Methods: The study consisted of 3 consecutive survey rounds evaluating agreement on different statements regarding pectus excavatum care. Consensus was achieved if at least 70% of participants provided a concurring opinion., Results: All 3 rounds were completed by 57 participants (18% response rate). Consensus was achieved on 18 of 62 statements (29%). Regarding the diagnostic protocol, participants agreed to routinely include conventional photography. In the presence of cardiac impairment, electrocardiography and echocardiography were indicated. Upon suspicion of pulmonary impairment, spirometry was recommended. In addition, consensus was reached on the indications for corrective surgery, including symptomatic pectus excavatum and progression. Participants moreover agreed that a plain chest radiograph must be acquired directly after surgery, whereas conventional photography and physical examination should both be part of routine postoperative follow-up., Conclusions: Through a multiround survey, international consensus was formed on multiple topics to aid standardization of pectus excavatum care., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this article, part of the Thoracic Surgery Worldwide series, is to provide a descriptive review of how thoracic surgery is organized in the Netherlands. General information is provided on the Dutch healthcare system, as well as on how Dutch thoracic surgeons are organized and trained. Additionally, this study provides information on our national quality surveillance system, an overview of the most common thoracic surgeries performed in our country, and details of academic research conducted by Dutch medical specialists. Furthermore, we discuss current challenges and future perspectives. In the Netherlands general thoracic surgical procedures are performed by approximately 110 general thoracic surgeons and 25 of the 135 cardiothoracic surgeons. Dutch thoracic surgeons provide minimally invasive lung surgery, chest wall surgery, thymic and mediastinal surgery, and surgical diagnosis and treatment of pleural disorders. Some recently published data on hospital mortality and postoperative adverse events of thoracic surgeries are reported. Furthermore, the structure of the thoracic surgical education and training program is discussed, highlighting the particular structure of two educational programs for thoracic surgery via a general thoracic and cardiothoracic surgery program. To assure high-quality surgical care, the Netherlands has a well-structured national quality surveillance system, involving frequent site visits and mandatory participation in the national lung cancer surgery registry for all hospitals. In terms of academic research, the Netherlands ranked 14th worldwide on number of clinical trials conducted across all medical disciplines in 2021. Furthermore, several thoracic-related (inter-)national multicenter randomized trials which are currently performed and initiated by Dutch hospital research groups are mentioned. Finally, future challenges and advances of Dutch thoracic surgery are addressed, including the implementation of lung cancer screening, imbalanced labor market, and centralization of care., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-22-482/coif). The series “Thoracic Surgery Worldwide” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pectus excavatum often imposes significant burden on the patients' quality of life. However, despite the known biopsychosocial effects, the deformity remains underappreciated. Patient reported outcome measures can be used to measure and appreciate results from a patient's perspective. The pectus excavatum evaluation questionnaire (PEEQ) is the most employed disease specific instrument to measure patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A translation and linguistic validation of this questionnaire is presented for its use in the Dutch pediatric pectus excavatum population. By providing an insight in our translation process, we want to encourage other researchers to perform translations to other languages to make the questionnaire available to clinicians and researchers worldwide., Methods: The 22-item PEEQ was translated and adapted according to the leading guidelines for the translation of patient reported outcome measures. Conceptual equivalence and cultural adaptation were emphasized., Results: One forward translation was produced through reconciliation of two forward translations. Back translation resulted in 15 identical items, as well as 6 literal, and 1 conceptual discrepancy. The latter was expected as during the forward translation a more culturally appropriate translation was chosen. Ten patients were involved during the cognitive debriefing process, following which one item was revised and the final Dutch version was established., Conclusions: We provide a culturally appropriate and linguistically validated Dutch version of the PEEQ., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-22-252/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Background: Optimal dosing and duration of adjuvant treatment with PD-1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors have not been established. Prior to their regulatory approval we investigated a low-dose regimen of nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in a sequential dual-cohort phase II clinical trial., Methods: Following the complete resection of melanoma metastases, patients were treated with a single fixed dose of ipilimumab (50 mg) plus 4 bi-weekly fixed doses of nivolumab (10 mg) (cohort-1), or nivolumab for 1 year (10 mg fixed dose, Q2w x9, followed by Q8w x4) (cohort-2). Twelve-months relapse-free survival (RFS) served as the primary endpoint., Results: After a median follow-up of 235 weeks for cohort-1 (34 patients), and 190 weeks for cohort-2 (21 patients), the 12-months RFS-rate was, respectively, 55.9% (95% CI, 39-72), and 85.7% (95% CI, 70-100). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 27 (79%), and 18 (86%) patients, with 3 (9%), and 1 (5%) grade 3 adverse events in cohort-1 and -2, respectively. Immunohistochemical quantification of intra- and peritumoral CD3 + T cells and CD20 + B cells, but not PD-1/PD-L1 staining, correlated significantly with RFS., Conclusions: One year of adjuvant low-dose nivolumab could be an effective and economically advantageous alternative for standard dosing, at the condition of further confirmation in a larger patient cohort. A shorter low-dose nivolumab plus ipilimumab regimen seems inferior and less tolerable.

Introduction: In patients with metastatic melanoma, progression of a single tumour lesion (solitary progression) after response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is increasingly treated with local therapy. We evaluated the role of local therapy for solitary progression in melanoma., Patients and Methods: Patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICI between 2010 and 2019 with solitary progression as first progressive event were included from 17 centres in 9 countries. Follow-up and survival are reported from ICI initiation., Results: We identified 294 patients with solitary progression after stable disease in 15%, partial response in 55% and complete response in 30%. The median follow-up was 43 months; the median time to solitary progression was 13 months, and the median time to subsequent progression after treatment of solitary progression (TTSP) was 33 months. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 79%; median OS was not reached. Treatment consisted of systemic therapy (18%), local therapy (36%), both combined (42%) or active surveillance (4%). In 44% of patients treated for solitary progression, no subsequent progression occurred. For solitary progression during ICI (n = 143), the median TTSP was 29 months. Both TTSP and OS were similar for local therapy, ICI continuation and both combined. For solitary progression post ICI (n = 151), the median TTSP was 35 months. TTSP was higher for ICI recommencement plus local therapy than local therapy or ICI recommencement alone (p = 0.006), without OS differences., Conclusion: Almost half of patients with melanoma treated for solitary progression after initial response to ICI had no subsequent progression. This study suggests that local therapy can benefit patients and is associated with favourable long-term outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement All authors declare no direct conflict with this work. For unrelated conflicts, K.P.M.S. has an advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, AbbVie and Pierre Fabre and has received honoraria from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche. L.Z. has an advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi and Sun Pharma; has received research funding from Novartis; has received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Roche and has received travel support from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi and Sun Pharma. E.W.K. has an advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis and Pierre Fabre; has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and has received travel support from Roche. C.A. has received travel support from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb and Roche. D.B.J. has an advisory role for Array BioPharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck and Novartis; has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and Incyte and has received travel support from Genentech. Adriana H. is an employee of AstraZeneca with stock options in the company, has received honoraria from Novartis; has an advisory role for L.E.K. Consulting and has received travel support from Roche. J.M. has received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck-Pfizer, MSD, Novartis and Pierre Fabre; has an advisory role for Amgen, Merck-Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Pierre Fabre and has received travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb, L'Oreal, MSD, Pierre Fabre and Ultrasun. P.B. has received travel support from MSD. Y.J.L.J. has received travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD and Pfizer. V.A. has received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Pierre Fabre; has an advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Roche and has received travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, OncoSec and Pierre Fabre. P.A.A. has an advisory role for 4SC, Alkermes, Amgen, Array BioPharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, Genmab, Idera, Immunoscore, Incyte, Italfarmaco, MedImmune, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nektar, NewLink Genetics, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sandoz, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, Syndax and Ultimovacs; has received research funding from Array BioPharma, Bristol Myers Squibb and Genentech; has received travel support from Merck Sharp & Dohme and is a stockowner of PrimeVax. Andrew H. has received honoraria from Merck and Novartis and has an advisory role for Novartis and Pierre Fabre. A.M.M. has an advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pierre Fabre and Roche. G.V.L. is a consultant advisor for Aduro Biotech, Inc., Amgen Inc., Array BioPharma Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb, Highlight Therapeutics S.L., Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis Pharma AG, QBiotics Group Limited, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and SkylineDX B.V. C.L. had received honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre and Roche; has an advisory role for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi; has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and Roche and has received travel support from Bristol Myers Squibb and Merck Sharp & Dohme. A.A.M.v.d.V. has an advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Ipsen, MSD Oncology, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Sanofi and has received research funding from Bayer and travel support from Bayer, MSD Oncology, Novartis and Roche. M.S.C. has an advisory role for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, IDEAYA Biosciences, Merck and Co, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nektar, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi and QBiotics and has received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Novartis. S.S. has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck and Merck Serono; has an advisory role for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis and Roche outside the submitted work and has received research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Endocyte, Genentech and Merck Sharp & Dohme. E.G.E.d.V. has an advisory role for Daiichi Sankyo, NSABP and Sanofi; has received research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chugai Pharma, CytomX Therapeutics, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Nordic Nanovector, Radius Health, Regeneron, Roche, Servier and Synthon and is the chair of ESMO Cancer Medicines Working Group, chair of RECITS committee and member of the ESMO-MCBS working group. C.U.B. has received research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis and NanoString; has an advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, Genmab and Pierre Fabre and is a stockowner of Uniti Cars. M.J. has an advisory role for Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Tesaro and Pierre Fabre., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: No standard protocol for surveillance for melanoma patients is established. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (whole-body MRI) is a safe and sensitive technique that avoids exposure to X-rays and contrast agents. This prospective study explores the use of whole-body MRI for the early detection of recurrences. Material and Methods: Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (seventh edition; AJCC-7) stages IIIb/c or -IV melanoma who were disease-free following resection of macrometastases (cohort A), or obtained a durable complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) following systemic therapy (cohort B), were included. All patients underwent whole-body MRI, including T1, Short Tau Inversion Recovery, and diffusion-weighted imaging, every 4 months the first 3 years of follow-up and every 6 months in the following 2 years. A total body skin examination was performed every 6 months. Results: From November 2014 to November 2019, 111 patients were included (four screen failures, cohort A: 68 patients; cohort B: 39 patients). The median follow-up was 32 months. Twenty-six patients were diagnosed with suspected lesions. Of these, 15 patients were diagnosed with a recurrence on MRI. Eleven suspected lesions were considered to be of non-neoplastic origin. In addition, nine patients detected a solitary subcutaneous metastasis during self-examination, and two patients presented in between MRIs with recurrences. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were, respectively, 58%, 98%, 58%, 98%, and 98%. Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of distant metastases was respectively 88% and 98%. No patient experienced a clinically meaningful (>grade 1) adverse event. Conclusions: Whole-body MRI for the surveillance of melanoma patients is a safe and sensitive technique sparing patients' cumulative exposure to X-rays and contrast media.

Uveal melanoma is a rare disease. Up to 50% of the patients will develop metastases for which the treatment options are limited. No randomized controlled data for the treatment of uveal melanoma patients are available. In this study we describe the clinical course of nine uveal melanoma patients included in the pembrolizumab expanded access program (EAP) in Belgium. Nine uveal melanoma patients were treated in the EAP with 2mg/kg pembrolizumab every 3 weeks. Patients received pembrolizumab as first or second-line treatment. Baseline characteristics and tumor responses were prospectively collected. During a median follow-up of 40 weeks, the estimated median PFS was 18 weeks (95% CI 0.7-35) and median OS was 46 weeks (95% CI 33-59%). Four patients had stable disease (SD) for more than 20 weeks (PFS of 21, 22, and 27 weeks respectively) and 1 patient presented with SD for 119 weeks. No objective responses according to irRC were observed. One grade 3 hepatitis occurred which was reversible with the administration of high doses oral corticosteroids. Even though treatment with pembrolizumab is well tolerated, clinical benefit is disappointing. Nevertheless long-term diseases control can be achieved in selected cases., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Yanina Jansen: received travel grant support from BMS, MSD, Pfizer; Seremet Teofila: Congresses and advisory fees from Novartis and one preceptorship MSD; Bart Neyns: Honoraria-Bristol-Myers Squibb; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Novartis; Roche. Consulting or Advisory Role-Bristol-Myers Squibb; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Novartis; Roche. Speakers’ Bureau-Novartis. Travel, Accommodations, Expenses-Amgen; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Novartis; Roche., (© The Author(s) 2020.)

Background: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blocking monoclonal antibodies improve the overall survival of patients with advanced melanoma but the optimal duration of treatment has not been established., Patients and Methods: This academic real-world cohort study investigated the outcome of 185 advanced melanoma patients who electively discontinued anti-PD-1 therapy with pembrolizumab (N = 167) or nivolumab (N = 18) in the absence of disease progression (PD) or treatment limiting toxicity (TLT) at 14 medical centres across Europe and Australia., Results: Median time on treatment was 12 months (range 0.7-43). The best objective tumour response at the time of treatment discontinuation was complete response (CR) in 117 (63%) patients, partial response (PR) in 44 (24%) patients and stable disease (SD) in 16 (9%) patients; 8 (4%) patients had no evaluable disease (NE). After a median follow-up of 18 months (range 0.7-48) after treatment discontinuation, 78% of patients remained free of progression. Median time to progression was 12 months (range 2-23). PD was less frequent in patients with CR (14%) compared with patients with PR (32%) and SD (50%). Six out of 19 (32%) patients who were retreated with an anti-PD-1 at the time of PD obtained a new antitumour response., Conclusions: In this real-world cohort of advanced melanoma patients discontinuing anti-PD-1 therapy in the absence of TLT or PD, the duration of anti-PD-1 therapy was shorter when compared with clinical trials. In patients obtaining a CR, and being treated for >6 months, the risk of relapse after treatment discontinuation was low. Patients achieving a PR or SD as best tumour response were at higher risk for progression after discontinuing therapy, and defining optimal treatment duration in such patients deserves further study. Retreatment with an anti-PD-1 at the time of progression may lead to renewed antitumour activity in some patients., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02673970 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02673970?cond=melanoma&cntry=BE&city=Jette&rank=3)., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

DNA demethylating agents may increase the immunogenicity of malignant tumours and increase the efficacy of subsequent treatment with immune check point inhibitors. We investigated the safety of administrating the demethylating agent decitabine by hepatic arterial infusionin patients with unresectable liver meta stases from solid tumours in a dose escalation phase I clinical trial. A total of nine eligible patients were enrolled and initiated study treatment at three different dose levels (two patients at 10, four at 15 and six at a dose level of 20mg decitabine/m2/day) (per protocol there was no intent to escalate the dose above the median tolerated intravenous dose level). Decitabine was administered as a 1-hour hepatic arterial infusion on five consecutive days every 4 weeks. Intrapatient dose escalation was applied in five patients. Grades 1 and 2 haematological toxicity was the most frequent treatment-related adverse event. None of the patients experienced treatment-limiting adverse events. Expression analysis of 30 cancer test is antigens (CTA) in pretreatment and post-treatment biopsies from patients indicated an increased expression of 21 CTAs after treatment. There were no objective tumour responses on study treatment or during post study exposure to immune checkpoint therapy in four patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases. We conclude that the investigate d hepatic arterial administration regimen for decitabine can be safely applied, and a dose level of 20 mg/m2/day on five consecutive days every 4 weeks can be considered for further investigation in combinatorial immunotherapy regimens., Trial Registration Number: NCT02316028., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.