Search

Background: Under-treatment is frequently present in geriatric patients. Because this patient group often suffer from multiple diseases, polypharmacy (defined as the concomitant chronic use of five or more drugs) and contra-indications to indicated drugs may also frequently be present. Objective: To describe the prevalence of under-treatment with respect to frequently indicated medications before and after comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and the prevalence of contraindications to these medications. Patients and Methods: The geriatric outpatients evaluated in this study had previously been included in a prospective descriptive study conducted in 2004. Demographic data, medical history, co-morbidity and medication use and changes were documented. The absence of drugs indicated for frequently under-treated conditions before and after CGA was compared. Under-treatment was defined as omission of drug therapy indicated for the treatment or prevention of 13 established diseases or conditions known to be frequently under-treated. Co-morbid conditions were independently classified by two geriatricians, who determined whether or not a condition represented a contraindication to use of these drugs. Results: In 2004, 807 geriatric outpatients were referred for CGA. Of these, 548 patients had at least one of the 13 selected diseases or conditions. Thirty-two of these patients were excluded from the analysis, leaving 516 patients. Before CGA, 170 of these patients were under-treated (32.9%); after CGA, 115 patients (22.3%) were under-treated. Contraindications were present in 102 of the patients (19.8%) and were more frequent in under-treated patients. After CGA, mean drug use and the prevalence of polypharmacy increased. Although 393 drugs were discontinued after CGA, the overall number of drugs used increased from 3177 before CGA to 3424 after CGA. Five times more drugs were initiated for a new diagnosis than for correction of under-treatment. Conclusions: Under-treatment is significantly reduced after CGA. Patients with contraindications to indicated medicines are more frequently under-treated. CGA leads to an increase in polypharmacy, mainly because of new conditions being diagnosed and despite frequent discontinuation of medications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Older people are often affected by impaired organ and bodily functions resulting in multimorbidity and polypharmacy, turning them into the main user group of many medicines. Very often, medicines have not specifically been developed for older people, causing practical medication problems for them like limited availability of easy to swallow formulations, easy to open packaging and dosing instructions for enteral administration. In 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) published a reflection paper 'Pharmaceutical development of medicines for use in the older population', which discusses how the emerging needs of an ageing European population can be addressed by medicines regulation. The paper intends to help industry to better consider the needs of older people during pharmaceutical/clinical medicines development by summarising data on the most relevant topics, providing early suggestions on how to move forward and prompting expert discussions and studies into knowledge gaps. Topics include patient acceptability, (dis)advantages of an administration route, formulation, dosage form, packaging, dosing device and user instruction. While the paper is directed at older people and the pharmaceutical industry, the reflections are also relevant to younger patients with similar disease-related needs and of value to other stakeholders parties, e.g., healthcare professionals, academics, patients and caregivers, as the paper makes clear what can be expected from industry and where collaborative work is needed. This commentary provides an overview of the different steps in the development of the reflection paper, discusses points considered most controversial and/or subject to (multidisciplinary) expert discussions and indicates their value for real world clinical practice., (© 2022 British Pharmacological Society.)

Ageing is associated with several changes in human organs, which result in altered medication pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Ageing is also associated with changes in human body functions, such as impaired vision, hearing, swallowing, motor and cognitive functions, which can affect the adequate intake and administration of drugs. As a consequence, older people, and especially patients older than 75 years, are the main users of many drugs and they frequently use 5 drugs or more long-term (i.e. polypharmacy). All this increases the complexity of adequate drug intake, administration and adherence. However, there is a lack of evidence on the considerations that should be taken into account to ensure appropriate drug prescribing to older people. This review article summarizes the most clinically relevant changes in human organ and body functions and the consequential changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in older people, along with possible dosing consequences or alternatives for drugs frequently prescribed to this patient population. Recommendations are given on how ageing could be considered in clinical drug development, drug authorization and appropriate prescribing., (© 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Introduction: Older people are prone to drug-related harm. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) in community pharmacies may improve appropriate prescribing in this population., Objective: This study investigated (persistent) drug therapy changes and its determinants to reduce potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in older patients based on CDSS alerts and to investigate barriers and facilitators for implementation of drug therapy changes based on these CDSS alerts., Methods: Five clinical decision rules based on national guidelines for inappropriate drugs in older patients were incorporated in a web-based CDSS in 31 community pharmacies between February and April 2017. The CDSS generated alerts for patients aged > 70 years who had prescriptions for one of the following drugs: alprazolam, amitriptyline, barnidipine, duloxetine, fluoxetine, trazodone, quetiapine and olanzapine. The registered alert management data and medication dispensing histories were analysed to find potential determinants of persistent drug therapy changes. Ten pharmacists were interviewed about the barriers and facilitators for implementing drug therapy changes based on CDSS alerts. An inductive thematic analysis of the transcripts was performed., Results: The pharmacists recorded the management of 1810 of the 2589 generated alerts, and 158 (8.7%) alerts were associated with a persistent drug therapy change. A logistic regression analysis found that the drug triggering the alert and the type of prescription [first dispensing vs. repeat; odds ratio 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.4-3.2)] were significantly associated with persistent drug therapy changes. No association was found between persistent changes and age, sex, number of medicines in use, or recent clinical medication review. Analysis of the interviews revealed nine barriers and facilitators associated with drug therapy change., Conclusion: When community pharmacists implemented CDSS alerts to reduce inappropriate drug use in older patients, they registered a persistent drug therapy change in 8.7% of the cases. Alerts triggered by a first prescription were two times more likely to be associated with a persistent drug therapy change than alerts triggered by repeat prescriptions. This study found that clinical rules can be used to detect inappropriate drug use in older patients and that drug therapy can change based on the alerts. This suggests that CDSS alerts are a useful tool for implementing guidelines on PIM in older patients in daily practice.

Purpose/background: The duration of untreated depression is a predictor for poor future prognosis, making rapid dose finding essential. Genetic variation of the CYP2D6 isoenzyme can influence the optimal dosage needed for individual patients. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of CYP2D6 pharmacogenetic screening to accelerate drug dosing in older patients with depression initiating nortriptyline or venlafaxine., Methods/procedures: In this randomized controlled trial, patients were randomly allocated to one of the study arms. In the intervention arm (DG-I), the specific genotype accompanied by a standardized dosing recommendation based on the patients' genotype and the prescribed drug was directly communicated to the physician of the participant. In both the deviating genotype control arm (DG-C) and the nonrandomized control arm, the physician of the participants was not informed about the genotype and the associated dosing advise. The primary outcome was the time needed to reach adequate drug levels: (1) blood levels within the therapeutic range and (2) no dose adjustments within the previous 3 weeks., Findings/results: No significant difference was observed in mean time to reach adequate dose or time to adequate dose between DG-I and DG-C. Compared with the nonrandomized control arm group, adequate drug levels were reached significantly faster in the DG-I group (log-rank test; P = 0.004), and there was a similar nonsignificant trend for the DG-C group (log-rank test; P = 0.087)., Implications/conclusions: The results of this study do not support pharmacogenetic CYP2D6 screening to accelerate dose adjustment for nortriptyline and venlafaxine in older patients with depression.

Inappropriate prescribing is a major health care issue, especially regarding older patients on polypharmacy. Multiple implicit and explicit prescribing tools have been developed to improve prescribing, but these have hardly ever been used in combination. The Systematic Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing (STRIP) combines implicit prescribing tools with the explicit Screening Tool to Alert physicians to the Right Treatment and Screening Tool of Older People's potentially inappropriate Prescriptions criteria and has shared decision-making with the patient as a critical step. This article describes the STRIP and its ability to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing. The STRIP improved general practitioners' and final-year medical students' medication review skills. The Web-application STRIP Assistant was developed to enable health care providers to use the STRIP in daily practice and will be incorporated in clinical decision support systems. It is currently being used in the European Optimizing thERapy to prevent Avoidable hospital admissions in the Multimorbid elderly (OPERAM) project, a multicentre randomized controlled trial involving patients aged 75 years and older using multiple medications for multiple medical conditions. In conclusion, the STRIP helps health care providers to systematically identify potentially inappropriate prescriptions and medication-related problems and to change the patient's medication regimen in accordance with the patient's needs and wishes. This article describes the STRIP and the available evidence so far. The OPERAM study is investigating the effect of STRIP use on clinical and economic outcomes., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Comparisons of clinical trial findings in systematic reviews can be hindered by the heterogeneity of the outcomes reported. Moreover, the outcomes that matter most to patients might be underreported. A core outcome set can address these issues, as it defines a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in all clinical trials in a particular area of research. The objective in this study was to develop a core outcome set for clinical trials of medication review in multi-morbid older patients with polypharmacy., Methods: Firstly, eligible outcomes were identified through a systematic review of trials of medication review in older patients (≥65 years) and interviews with 15 older patients. Secondly, an international three-round Delphi survey in four countries involving patients, healthcare professionals, and experts was conducted to validate outcomes to be included in the core outcome set. Consensus meetings were conducted to validate the results., Results: Of the 164 participants invited to take part in the Delphi survey, 150 completed Round 1, including 55 patients or family caregivers, 55 healthcare professionals, and 40 experts. A total of 129 participants completed all three rounds. Sixty-four eligible outcomes were extracted from 47 articles, 32 clinical trial protocols, and patient interviews. Thirty outcomes were removed and one added after Round 1, 18 outcomes were removed after Round 2, and seven after Round 3. Results were discussed during consensus meetings. Consensus was reached on seven outcomes, which constitute the core outcome set: drug-related hospital admissions; drug overuse; drug underuse; potentially inappropriate medications; clinically significant drug-drug interactions; health-related quality of life; pain relief., Conclusions: We developed a core outcome set of seven outcomes which should be used in future trials of medication review in multi-morbid older patients with polypharmacy.