Search

The objective of the study was to evaluate the association between adherence to plant-based dietary patterns and anthropometric indices among primary school girls in Kerman. This cross-sectional study included 330 girls aged 6–12. A reliable and validated dish-based food frequency questionnaire was used to collect dietary data. Weight, height, and mid-arm circumference were measured, and z-score charts from the World Health Organization for girls between the ages of 5 and 19 were utilized. We used Satija et al. method to calculate plant-based diet index scores. After adjusting for age and energy, participants in the higher tertile of the overall plant-based diet index (PDI) had a lower height-for-age z score (HAZ) (0.38±0.12 vs. 0.59±0.12 kg; P = 0.033). Higher unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI) scores were significantly associated with decreased HAZ in models 2 (p = 0.028) and 3 (p = 0.035). A higher PDI score was associated with lower odds of being underweight and overweight, respectively (Model 1: P trend = 0.007, <0.001; Model 2: P trend = 0.010, 0.001). A significant inverse association was found between healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI) scores and underweight risk in the crude and adjusted models. (Model 1: P trend = 0.021; model 2: P trend = 0.018; Model 3: P trend = 0.031). Higher uPDI scores were associated with increased odds of being overweight and obese in all three models (Model 1: p trend<0.001; Model 2: p trend<0.001; Model 3: p trend = 0.001). We concluded that children who followed a plant-based diet had lower odds of being overweight and obese. Higher scores on the hPDI were linked to a decreased risk of being underweight, while higher scores on the uPDI were associated with an increased risk of being overweight and obese. The study suggests healthy plant-based diet may benefit children's weight and growth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: There are contradictory results regarding the relationship between dietary intakes of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and risk of stroke., Objective: The purpose of this study was to review the existing body of research on the relationship between MUFA consumption and stroke risk through a systematic review and meta-analysis., Data Source: PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science were all systematically searched up to January 2023., Data Extraction: A total of 11 prospective cohort studies that investigated MUFA consumption in relation to stroke risk were included., Data Analysis: Relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs for the highest vs lowest category of dietary MUFA intake were combined using a random-effects model. Linear and nonlinear dose-response relations were assessed through 1-stage weighted mixed-effects meta-analysis. These studies included 475 207 participants and 8438 cases. In highest vs lowest consumption analysis, MUFA intake was inversely associated with total stroke (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.96; I2 =65.2%, Q-test P = .001; n = 11) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.95; I2 = 0.0%, Q-test P = .77; n = 5) risk. Conversely, this association was not significant for ischemic stroke (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.69, 1.07; I2 =62.3%, Q-test P = .01; n = 8). An inverse association was observed between each 10-g/d MUFA intake and hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.96) but not total and ischemic stroke. We did not find any evidence for a nonlinear association between MUFA intake and total stroke and its subtypes., Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that higher MUFA intake could lower the risk of total and hemorrhagic, but not ischemic, stroke. This could be important for public health., Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023458555., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Life Sciences Institute. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)