Search

The Mascagni lymphatic pathway comprises superficial channels along the clavicle that drain upper extremity lymph. A 65 year-old woman with recurrent left breast cancer presented with a non-functioning chemotherapy port in the right deltopectoral groove. She had undergone right mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). After port removal and wound closure she developed right upper extremity lymphedema. Patients who have undergone ALND may depend solely on this pathway for upper extremity lymphatic drainage. Level of evidence: level V

The purpose of the study was to show that delayed axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has higher rates of lymphedema compared with immediate ALND, using data from NSABP-B32 at Beaumont Hospital.NSABP B-32 at Beaumont had 207 patients with follow-up data on 199 patients, randomizing clinically negative axilla to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)+ALND (GrA N=98), and SLNB+cytology±ALND (GrB N=101). All patients had preoperative volumetric arm measurements and only node negatives had routine postoperative measurements assessing lymphedema for 36 months. We contacted node-positive patients for postoperative measurements for this study. Twenty-four and 15 cytology-positive patients had SLNB+ALND in GrA and GrB, respectively (SubGrA1 N=24; SubGrB1 N=15). Fourteen hematoxylin and eosin-positive patients had delayed ALND (SubGrB2a N=14).Lymphedema rate for node-positive SLNB+ALND was 10.3% [SubGrA1 (3/24)+SubGrB1 (1/15)=4/39] and node-negative SLNB+ALND was 6.8% (SubGrA2=5/74). Lymphedema was 14.3% for delayed ALND in SubGrB2a (2 of 14) and 0% for 72 SLNBs in SubGrB2b. Our study comparing immediate and delayed ALND lymphedema was not statistically significant (10.3% vs. 14.3%, P=0.65). Comparing node-negative ALND (SubGrA2= 5/74=6.8%) to node-positive ALND (A1+B1+B2a=6/53=11.3%) was not statistically significant (P=0.52). Comparing lymphedema for node-negative ALND (SubGrA2) to SLNB (SubGrB2b) only approached significance (6.8% vs. 0%, P=0.058).The rate of lymphedema was higher in delayed ALND but not statistically significant. Comparison, however, is difficult, given the limited sample size. We urge the other centers of NSABP-B32 to validate this, by contacting the node-positive patients for measurements. The lymphedema rate for SLNB alone was 0% and approached statistical significance when compared with node-negative ALND.

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to assess the cosmesis and toxicities in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma who received treatment with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using interstitial brachytherapy. METHODS From April 1993 to December 2001, 199 patients with Stage I–II breast carcinoma received breast-conserving therapy with APBI to the tumor bed alone through a low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose-rate (HDR) implant. A template guide was used. The LDR dose was 50 Gray (Gy) over 96 hours; the outpatient HDR implant delivered 32 Gy in 8-Gy or 34 Gy in 10-Gy twice-daily fractions. Cosmesis (Harvard criteria) and toxicities (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines) were assessed at ≤ 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years. RESULTS The median follow up was 6.4 years. Breast pain, edema, erythema, and hyperpigmentation all diminished over time. Breast fibrosis and hypopigmentation increased until the 2-year mark and then stabilized. Fat necrosis and telangiectasia increased over time, with a fat necrosis rate of 11% at 5 years. Nearly all telangiectasias (34% at 5 yrs) were Grade 1 (< 2 mm). The remaining toxicities were Grade 1 at all follow-up intervals. Infections (11%) occurred predominantly within the first month after treatment. Good-to-excellent cosmetic outcomes were noted in 95–99% of patients over time; cosmetic results stabilized at 2 years with excellent results increased out to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS APBI with interstitial brachytherapy resulted in mild chronic toxicities, the majority of which diminished or reached a plateau over time. Long-term cosmesis was good to excellent in 95–99% of patients and stabilized at 2 years. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.

Background Women with a history of breast and axillary surgery may demonstrate aberrant lymphatic drainage caused by disrupted lymphatic channels. Lymphoscintigraphy may be valuable in evaluation and staging of an ipsilateral second breast carcinoma. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 16 women treated for a second ipsilateral breast carcinoma who underwent breast lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative lymphatic mapping. Drainage patterns were compared with pathologic and operative findings. Results Lymphoscintigraphy succeeded in 69% of patients and demonstrated widely varied drainage patterns including ipsilateral axillary and supraclavicular as well as contralateral axillary and supraclavicular basins. No trend between successful lymphatic mapping and multiple clinical and pathologic measures was seen. Conclusions In women with a second ipsilateral breast carcinoma and history of previous breast and axillary surgery, lymphoscintigraphy is feasible. Drainage patterns vary widely including across the midline of the thorax. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy may be useful to ensure inclusion of potential sentinel nodes within the operative field.

The authors reviewed changes in the initial clinical presentation, management techniques, and patterns of disease recurrence over time (1981-1996) in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) at a single institution. The goals of the current study were to determine the frequency and use of optimal local and systemic therapy techniques and to evaluate the impact of these changes on treatment efficacy.Six hundred seven patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage I or II invasive breast carcinomas treated with BCT at William Beaumont Hospital (Royal Oak, MI) constituted the study population. All patients received at least an excisional biopsy of the primary tumor, an axillary lymph node staging procedure, and postoperative radiotherapy (RT) (a median tumor bed dose of 61 Gray [Gy] was administered). All sides were reviewed by one pathologist. Numerous clinicopathologic and treatment-related factors were analyzed to monitor changes that occurred over time. Changes in patterns of disease recurrence and treatment efficacy over time also were analyzed.Over the time period analyzed, changes at initial presentation included an increase in the mean age at diagnosis (age 56.1 years vs. 61.4 years; P0.001), a decrease in the number of patients with clinically palpable tumors (78% vs. 36%; P0.001), a decrease in the mean tumor size (2.2 cm vs. 1.6 cm; P0.001), but no change in the percentage of patients with negative lymph nodes (79% vs. 78%; P = 0.83). No differences over time were observed in mean tumor grade (2.0 vs. 1.9; P = 0.2) or the presence of angiolymphatic invasion (27% vs. 26%; P = 0.25). Changes in surgical management and pathologic assessment included the more frequent use of reexcision (46% vs. 81%; P0.001), larger mean total volumes of breast tissue specimens excised (115 cm3 vs. 189 cm3; P = 0.001), a larger percentage of patients with final negative surgical margins (74% vs. 97%; P0.001), and a small increase in the mean number of lymph nodes excised (13.8 lymph nodes vs. 14.1 lymph nodes; P = 0.01). The only other significant change in the pathologic management of patients over time included a doubling in the mean number of slides examined (10.6 slides vs. 21.1 slides; P0.001). Changes in adjuvant local and systemic therapy included an increase in the percentage of patients treated with60 Gy to the tumor bed (66% vs. 95%; P0.001), a doubling in the mean number of days from the last surgery to the start of RT (24 days vs. 50 days; P0.001), and a decrease in the use of regional lymph node RT (24% vs. 8%; P0.001). The use of adjuvant tamoxifen increased from 10% to 61% (P0.001). Finally, improvements were observed in the 5-year and 12-year actuarial rates of local disease recurrence (8% vs. 1% and 21% vs. 9%, respectively; P = 0.001) and distant metastases (12% vs. 4% and 22% vs. 9%, respectively; P = 0.006). No changes in the mean number of years to ipsilateral (6.5 years vs. 6.4 years; P = 0.59) or distant disease recurrence (4.6 years vs. 3.8 years; P = 0.73) were observed.The impact of screening mammography and substantial changes in surgical, pathologic, RT, and systemic therapy recommendations were observed over time in the study population. These changes were associated with improvements in 5-year and 12-year local and distant control rates and suggested that improvements in outcome can be realized through adherence to best practice guidelines and continuous monitoring of treatment outcome data.

We prospectively administered estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) to control estrogen deficiency symptoms in breast cancer survivors as part of our clinical practice. We report the consequences of ERT compared with a historical matched-control group.Two hundred seventy-seven disease-free survivors received ERT. Controls were matched for exact stage, a recurrence-free period similar to the period to ERT initiation in the ERT group, approximate age, and duration of follow-up. The mean time from breast cancer diagnosis to initiation of ERT was 3.61 (+/- 0.25) years, with a median of 1.88 years. The mean duration of ERT was 3.7 (+/- 3.01) years, with a median of 3.05 years.Hot flashes were relieved in 206 of 223 women (92%), dyspareunia/vaginal dryness in 149 of 167 women (89%), and reactive depression/anxiety/mood change in 111 of 126 women (88%). Univariate analysis demonstrated no statistical differences between the groups for age, stage, pathology at diagnosis, progesterone receptor status, local therapy, breast at risk, prior chemotherapy, and duration of follow-up. The ERT group was more likely to be estrogen receptor negative (P = 0.01), to have received prior ERT (P0.001), and to have received no adjuvant tamoxifen (P0.001). There was no significant difference between the ERT and control groups in ipsilateral primary/recurrence (5/155 v 5/143; P = 0.85), contralateral breast cancers (10/258 v 9/260; P = 0.99), or systemic metastasis (8/277 v 15/277; P = 0.13). Noncause-specific deaths in the control group numbered 15 (of 277), and in the ERT group, 7 (of 277) (P = 0.03). Overall survival favored the ERT group (P = 0.02).In these selected patients, ERT relieved estrogen deficiency symptoms and did not increase the rate or time to an ipsilateral recurrence/new primary, contralateral new primary, local-regional recurrence, or systemic metastases.

The authors reviewed their institution's experience treating mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) to determine 10-year rates of local control and survival, patterns of failure, and factors associated with outcome.From January 1980 to December 1993, 177 breasts in 172 patients were treated with BCT for mammographically detected DCIS of the breast at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.All patients underwent an excisional biopsy, and 65% were reexcised. Thirty-one breasts (18%) were treated with excision alone, whereas 146 breasts (82%) received postoperative radiation therapy (RT). All patients undergoing RT received whole-breast irradiation to a median dose of 50.0 Gy. One hundred thirty-six (93%) received a boost to the tumor bed for a median total dose of 60.4 Gy. Median follow-up was 5.9 years for the lumpectomy alone group and 7.2 years for the lumpectomy + RT group.In the entire population, 15 patients had an ipsilateral breast recurrence. The 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of ipsilateral breast recurrence were 7.8% and 7.8% for lumpectomy alone and 8.0% and 9.2% for lumpectomy + RT, respectively. Eleven of the 15 recurrences developed within or immediately adjacent to the lumpectomy cavity and were designated as true recurrences or marginal misses (TMM). Four recurred elsewhere in the breast. Eleven of the 15 recurrences were invasive, whereas 4 were pure DCIS. Only one patient died of disease, yielding 5- and 10-year actuarial cause-specific survival rates of 100% and 99.2%, respectively. Eleven patients were diagnosed with subsequent contralateral breast cancer, yielding 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of 5.1% and 8.3%, respectively. Clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for an association with ipsilateral breast failure or TR/MM. No factors were significantly associated with ipsilateral breast failure. In the entire population, the omission of RT and younger age at diagnosis were significantly associated with TR/MM. Patients younger than 45 years at diagnosis had a significantly higher rate of TR/MM in both the lumpectomy + RT and lumpectomy alone groups. None of the 37 patients who received a postexcisional mammogram had an ipsilateral breast failure versus 15 in the patients who did not receive a postexcisional mammogram.Patients diagnosed with mammographically detected DCIS of the breast appear to have excellent 100-year rates of local control and overall survival when treated with BCT. These results suggest that the use of RT reduces the risk of local recurrence and that patients diagnosed at a younger age have a higher rate of local recurrence with or without the use of postoperative RT.

BACKGROUND The authors reviewed their institution's experience treating patients with mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) to determine 10-year rates of local control and survival and to identify factors associated with local recurrence. METHODS From January 1980 to December 1993, 132 breasts in 130 patients were treated with BCT for mammographically detected DCIS at William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan. All patients underwent an excisional biopsy, and 64% were reexcised. All patients received postoperative whole-breast irradiation to a median dose of 45.0 Gray (Gy) (range: 43.1–56.0 Gy). One hundred twenty-four cases (94%) received a boost to the tumor bed for a median total dose of 60.4 Gy (range: 45.0–71.8 Gy). All cases underwent complete pathologic review by one pathologist. The median follow-up was 7.0 years. RESULTS Of the entire study group, 13 patients developed recurrence within the ipsilateral breast, for 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of 8.9% and 10.3%, respectively. Nine of the 13 recurrences (69%) occurred within or immediately adjacent to the lumpectomy cavity and were designated as true recurrences or marginal misses (TR/MM). Four patients (31%) had recurrence elsewhere in the breast. Ten of the 13 recurrences (77%) were invasive, whereas 3 (23%) were pure DCIS. Only 1 patient died of disease, corresponding to 5- and 10-year actuarial cause specific survival rates of 100% and 99.0%, respectively. Multiple clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for association with ipsilateral breast failure or TR/MM. In multivariate analysis, only the absence of pathologic calcifications was significantly associated with ipsilateral breast failure. When specifically analyzed for TR/MM, younger age at diagnosis, number of slides with DCIS, number of DCIS and cancerization of lobules (COL) foci within 5 mm of the margin, and the absence of pathologic calcifications demonstrated a statistically significant association. Close or positive margin status did not significantly predict for either TR/MM (P = 0.14) or ipsilateral breast failure (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS In patients with mammographically detected DCIS treated with BCT, adequate excision of all DCIS prior to RT can result in improved rates of local control. However, margin status may not adequately predict complete tumor extirpation. The volume of DCIS within 5 mm of the margin appears to be a more reliable surrogate for the adequacy of excision. In addition, young patient age and the absence of pathologic calcifications are independent risk factors for the development of local recurrence. Cancer 2000;88:596–607. © 2000 American Cancer Society.

We present the preliminary findings of our in-house protocol treating the tumor bed alone after lumpectomy with low-dose-rate (LDR) interstitial brachytherapy in selected patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT).Since March 1, 1993, 60 women with early-stage breast cancer were entered into a protocol of tumor bed irradiation only using an interstitial LDR implant with iodine-125. Patients were eligible if the tumor wasor = 3 cm, margins wereor = 2 mm, there was no extensive intraductal component, the axilla was surgically staged, and a postoperative mammogram was performed. Implants were placed using a standardized template either at the time of reexcision or shortly after lumpectomy. A total of 50 Gy was delivered at 0.52 Gy/h over a period of 96 h to the lumpectomy bed plus a 2-cm margin. Perioperative complications, cosmetic outcome, and local control were assessed.The median follow-up for all patients is 20 months. Three patients experienced minimal perioperative pain that required temporary nonnarcotic analgesics. There have been four postoperative infections which resolved with oral antibiotics. No significant skin reactions related to the implant were noted and no patient experienced impaired would healing. Early cosmetic results reveal minimal changes consisting of transient hyperpigmentation of the skin at the puncture sites and temporary induration in the tumor bed. Good to excellent cosmetic results were noted in all 19 patients followed up a minimum of 24 months posttherapy. To date, 51 women have obtained 6-12-month follow-up mammograms and no recurrences have been noted. All patients currently have no physical signs of recurrence, and no patient has failed regionally or distantly.Treatment of the tumor bed alone with LDR interstitial brachytherapy appears to be well tolerated, and early results are promising. Long-term follow-up of these patients is necessary to establish the equivalence of this treatment approach compared to standard BCT, however.

Laboratory markers help medical oncologists predict chemotherapy resistance. The multidrug resistance gene (MDR1) and its P-glycoprotein product (MDR1) hold the promise of being such a marker. The only studies that have correlated the expression of MDR with clinical response to chemotherapy have used immunohistochemical reactions on tissue sections with monoclonal antibodies to MDR1. We have conducted such a study with a polyclonal antibody. The presence of MDR1 in our study did not define a population of chemotherapy- resistant patients. Correlative laboratory and clinical studies need to be performed to define the role of MDR in human breast cancer.

We present our ongoing clinical experience utilizing 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) to deliver partial-breast irradiation (PBI) in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.Thirty-one patients referred for postoperative radiation therapy after lumpectomy were treated with PBI using our previously reported 3D-CRT technique. Ninety-four percent of patients had surgical clips outlining the lumpectomy cavity (mean: 6 clips). The clinical target volume (CTV) consisted of the lumpectomy cavity plus a 10-mm margin in 9 patients and 15-mm margin in 22 (median: 15 mm). The planning target volume consisted of the CTV plus a 10-mm margin for breathing motion and treatment setup uncertainties. The prescribed dose (PD) was 34 or 38.5 Gy (6 patients and 25 patients, respectively) in 10 fractions b.i.d. separated by 6 h and delivered in 5 consecutive days. Patients were treated in the supine position with 3-5 beams (mean: 4) designed to irradiate the CTV with10% inhomogeneity and a comparable or lower dose to the heart, lung, and contralateral breast compared with standard whole-breast tangents. The median follow-up duration is 10 months (range: 1-30 months). Four patients have been followed2 years, 61.5 years, and 51 year. The remaining 16 patients have been followed12 months.No skin changes greater than Grade 1 erythema were noted during treatment. At the initial 4-8-week follow-up visit, 19 patients (61%) experienced Grade 1 toxicity and 3 patients (10%) Grade 2 toxicity. No Grade 3 toxicities were observed. The remaining 9 patients (29%) had no observable radiation effects. Cosmetic results were rated as good/excellent in all evaluable patients at 6 months (n = 3), 12 months (n = 5), 18 months (n = 6), and in the 4 evaluable patients at2 years after treatment. The mean coverage of the CTV by the 100% isodose line (IDL) was 98% (range: 54-100%, median: 100%) and by the 95% IDL, 100% (range: 99-100%). The mean coverage of the planning target volume by the 95% IDL was 100% (range: 97-100%). The mean percentage of the breast receiving 100% of the PD was 23% (range: 14-39%). The mean percentage of the breast receiving 50% of the PD was 47% (range: 34-60%).Utilizing 3D-CRT to deliver PBI is technically feasible, and acute toxicity to date has been minimal. Additional follow-up will be needed to assess the long-term effects of these larger fraction sizes on normal-tissue sequelae and the impact of this fractionation schedule on treatment efficacy.

Background and Objectives We reviewed our institution's experience treating patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) to help define the interrelationship between excision volume, margin status, and tumor size with local recurrence. Methods From January 1980 to December 1993, 146 patients received BCT for DCIS. All patients underwent excisional biopsy and 95 cases (64%) underwent re-excision. Each patient received whole breast radiation to a median dose of 45 Gy. An additional 139 cases (94%) received a supplemental boost to the tumor bed (median total dose 60.4 Gy). The median follow-up is 7.2 years. Results Seventeen patients developed an ipsilateral breast failure for a 5- and 10-year actuarial rate of 10.2 and 12.4%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, patient age, margin status, the number of slides containing DCIS, the number of DCIS/cancerization of lobules (COL) foci near (< 5 mm) the margin, and a smaller volume of excision (< 60 cm3) were all independently associated with outcome. Although the local recurrence rate generally decreased as margin distance increased, these differences did not achieve statistical significance unless the volume of excision was taken into consideration. Conclusions These findings suggest that the success of BCT is directly related to the degree of surgical removal of DCIS and that margin status alone may be suboptimal in defining excision adequacy. J. Surg. Oncol. 2001;76:245–254. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

PURPOSE: We reviewed our institution’s experience treating patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) with breast-conserving therapy (BCT) to determine the impact of patient age on outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1980 to 1993, 146 patients were treated with BCT for DCIS. All patients underwent excisional biopsy, and 64% underwent re-excision. All patients received whole-breast irradiation to a median dose of 45 Gy. Ninety-four percent of patients received a boost to the tumor bed, for a median total dose of 60.4 Gy. All slides on every patient were reviewed by one pathologist. The median follow-up period was 7.2 years. RESULTS: Seventeen patients developed an ipsilateral local recurrence, for 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of 10.2% and 12.4%, respectively. The 10-year rate of ipsilateral failure was 26.1% in patients younger than 45 years of age versus 8.6% in older patients (P = .03). On multivariate analysis, young age was independently associated with recurrence of the index lesion (true recurrence/marginal miss [TR/MM] failures), regardless of how it was analyzed (eg, < 45 years of age or as a continuous variable). In addition, young patients had a dramatically higher 10-year rate of invasive TR/MM failures (19.9% v 3.2%). In a separate multivariate analysis for the development of invasive TR/MM failures, only patient age and predominant nuclear grade were independently associated with recurrence. The relationship between excision volume and outcome was analyzed in the 95 patients who underwent re-excision. The 5-year actuarial rate of TR/MM failure was significantly worse only in young patients with smaller (< 40 mL) re-excision volumes (33.3% v 9.1%; P = .02). In a separate multivariate analysis of only these 95 patients (25 of whom were < 45 years of age), the volume of re-excision had the strongest association with outcome (P = .05). Patient age was no longer associated with local recurrence. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that young patients with DCIS have a significantly greater risk of local recurrence after BCT that is independent of other previously defined risk factors. Our data also suggest that the extent of resection may in part be related to the less optimal results that are observed in these patients.

The authors reviewed the experience at their institution treating patients with locally advanced breast cancer using multimodality therapy to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors affecting outcome. One hundred patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated with definitive therapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Three patients had stage IIB disease, 45 patients had stage IIIA disease, and 52 patients had IIIB disease. Thirteen patients had inflammatory breast carcinoma. Seventy-four patients (74%) received trimodality therapy consisting of systemic therapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Systemic therapy was delivered to 90 patients. Eighty-three patients (83%) received adjuvant radiation therapy. Eighty-five patients underwent mastectomy (85%). Multiple clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for their impact on outcome. The median follow-up was 47 months. Overall, the 5-year actuarial rates of local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival were 81%, 43%, 53%, and 55%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial cause-specific survival rates for patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma, stage IIIA disease, and stage IIIB disease were 25%, 55%, and 53%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, local control was improved with radiation therapy (p = 0.008) and the absence of inflammatory breast carcinoma (p = 0.008). Disease-free survival was improved with the addition of radiation therapy (p = 0.001) and with less than four positive lymph nodes (p = 0.003). Distant metastasis-free survival was improved in patients without inflammatory breast carcinoma (p = 0.0249) and with less than four involved lymph nodes (p = 0.0135). Cause-specific survival and overall survival were adversely affected by the presence of inflammatory breast carcinoma (p = 0.0135 and p = 0.0325, respectively) or four or more involved lymph nodes (p = 0.0082 and p = 0.012, respectively). Radiation therapy appears to be a critical component in the overall treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer by improving the rates of local control and disease-free survival. Other adverse factors for survival include four or more positive lymph nodes and inflammatory breast carcinoma.

Purpose : We have retrospectively reviewed our institution's experience treating a predominantly mammographically detected population of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients with conservative surgery and radiation therapy (CSRT) to determine outcome and prognostic factors for local recurrence. Methods and Materials : Between January 1, 1982 and December 31, 1988, 52 consecutive cases of DCIS of the breast were treated with CSRT at William Beaumont Hospital. Forty-six (88%) were mammographically detected nonpalpable lesions. All patients underwent at least an excisional biopsy and 28 (54%) were reexcised. The axilla was surgically staged in 41 (79%) and all were N0. The entire breast was irradiated to 45–50 Gy over 5–6 weeks. The tumor bed was boosted in 49 (94%) so that the minimum dose was 60 Gy. The three patients not boosted received a minimum dose of 50 Gy to the entire breast. Pathologic materials were reviewed by one of the authors. Results : The predominant DCIS pattern was comedo in 40%, cribriform in 28%, solid in 17%, and micropapillary in 15%. The predominant nuclear grade was Grade I in 51%, Grade II in 49%, and Grade III in 0%. The median follow-up is 68 months. There have been three recurrences in the treated breast at a median time to failure of 30 months. The 5- and 8-year actuarial local recurrence rate is 6%. One patient recurred with invasive ductal cancer at 28 months, and the other two recurrences were DCIS at 30 and 50 months. All three patients were treated with salvage mastectomy. The patient who recurred locally with an invasive cancer developed metastasis and died at 64 months. The 5- and 8-year actuarial cause-specific survival rates are 100% and 97%, respectively. The following pathologic factors were analyzed for an association with local recurrence: predominant DCIS histology, predominant nuclear grade, and highest nuclear grade. Of these, the predominant nuclear grade was the best predictor of local recurrence (p = 0.070). No clinical or treatment related factor analyzed was associated with local recurrence. Conclusion : Our results indicate that excellent local control (94%) at 8 years is obtainable after CSRT in a mammographically detected population of patients with DCIS. The predominant nuclear grade was the only factor found that may be associated with local recurrence.

The use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors is controversial. This report describes the symptomatic benefit of HRT and the subsequent risk of recurrent breast cancer in a group of postmenopausal women with a prior history of locally treated breast cancer. One-hundred and fourteen disease-free patients received HRT to control estrogen deficiency problems after local breast cancer therapy. Thirty-three had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage O at diagnosis, 43 stage 1, 24 stage 2A, 12 stage 2B, 1 stage 3A, and 1 stage 3B. Pathology was infiltrating carcinoma in 81, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) 29, and lobular carcinoma in situ 4. Fifty-six were receiving HRT at the time of breast cancer diagnosis with 20 continuing HRT. One-hundred and eight patients received either an estrogen or an estrogen/progestin combination with 6 receiving vaginal estrogens. The time from breast cancer diagnosis to initiation of HRT ranged from .0 to 23.9, mean 3.7 years. HRT was administered for hot flashes in 77%, dyspareunia/vaginal dryness 53.5%, reactive depression/anxiety 34%. The duration of replacement therapy ranged from .10–17.5, mean 2.5 years. Hot flashes were relieved in 98%, dyspareunia/vaginal dryness 95%, and reactive depression/anxiety 95%. One new primary or ipsilateral breast recurrence (DCIS with microinvasion) 1.8%, (1/56, 95% confidence interval [Cl], .045–9.6%) was observed. One patient developed DCIS within breast tissue left on the chest wall after a modified mastectomy. Two new contralateral primaries, 2.0%, (2/103, 95% Cl, .24-6.8%) were observed. One occurred in the contralateral breast during therapy for an ipsilateral chest wall and systemic recurrence. Three patients, 3.0% (3/114, 95% Cl, .55–7.5%) have experienced systemic relapse with two deaths. In this selected group of postmenopausal women survivors, HRT dramatically relieved estrogen deficiency symptoms and did not appear to increase the risk of an ipsilateral, contralateral, or systemic recurrence.