Search

Driven by the approval of new targeted therapies, significant progress has been made in recent years in the clinical management of cutaneous T‑cell lymphomas. Although there are no curative treatment options for cutaneous T‑cell lymphomas, response rates are often encouraging, in particular when using combination therapies. The decision for the appropriate form of treatment depends on the specific diagnosis, disease stage, and the history of prior therapies. This article provides a comprehensive overview of current treatment options in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome, based on the recently published, revised German S2k guidelines on cutaneous lymphomas (update 2021). In addition, we present promising, yet-to-be-approved therapies that at least in part can be already used off-label in clinical practice today.In den letzten Jahren gab es im Bereich der Therapien für primär kutane T‑Zell-Lymphome unter anderem mit der Zulassung neuer zielgerichteter Therapien zahlreiche neue Entwicklungen. Auch wenn bisher keine kurativen Therapieoptionen existieren, lassen sich mit den zur Verfügung stehenden Therapien und insbesondere deren Kombinationen oft gute Ansprechraten erzielen. Die Therapieentscheidung richtet sich stets nach der genauen Diagnose, dem Erkrankungsstadium und den bereits erfolgten Vortherapien. Dieser Beitrag gibt eine Übersicht über die aktuellen Therapieoptionen bei Mycosis fungoides und Sézary-Syndrom und orientiert sich hierbei an der kürzlich erschienenen, überarbeiteten S2k-Leitlinie zu kutanen Lymphomen (Update 2021). Zudem stellen wir vielversprechende, jedoch (noch) nicht zugelassene Therapien vor, die zumindest teilweise bereits jetzt im Rahmen eines Off-Label-Einsatzes zur Anwendung kommen können.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are rare non-Hodgkin lymphomas with substantial morbidity and mortality in advanced disease stages. We compared the efficacy of mogamulizumab, a novel monoclonal antibody directed against C-C chemokine receptor 4, with vorinostat in patients with previously treated cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.In this open-label, international, phase 3, randomised controlled trial, we recruited patients with relapsed or refractory mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome at 61 medical centres in the USA, Denmark, France, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, Japan, and Australia. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years (in Japan, ≥20 years), had failed (for progression or toxicity as assessed by the principal investigator) at least one previous systemic therapy, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 1 or less and adequate haematological, hepatic, and renal function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive voice web response system to mogamulizumab (1·0 mg/kg intravenously on a weekly basis for the first 28-day cycle, then on days 1 and 15 of subsequent cycles) or vorinostat (400 mg daily). Stratification was by cutaneous T-cell lymphoma subtype (mycosis fungoides vs Sézary syndrome) and disease stage (IB-II vs III-IV). Since this study was open label, patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by investigator assessment in the intention-to-treat population. Patients who received one or more doses of study drug were included in the safety analyses. This study is ongoing, and enrolment is complete. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01728805.Between Dec 12, 2012, and Jan 29, 2016, 372 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive mogamulizumab (n=186) or vorinostat (n=186), comprising the intention-to-treat population. Two patients randomly assigned to mogamulizumab withdrew consent before receiving study treatment; thus, 370 patients were included in the safety population. Mogamulizumab therapy resulted in superior investigator-assessed progression-free survival compared with vorinostat therapy (median 7·7 months [95% CI 5·7-10·3] in the mogamulizumab group vs 3·1 months [2·9-4·1] in the vorinostat group; hazard ratio 0·53, 95% CI 0·41-0·69; stratified log-rank p0·0001). Grade 3-4 adverse events of any cause were reported in 75 (41%) of 184 patients in the mogamulizumab group and 76 (41%) of 186 patients in the vorinostat group. The most common serious adverse events of any cause were pyrexia in eight (4%) patients and cellulitis in five (3%) patients in the mogamulizumab group; and cellulitis in six (3%) patients, pulmonary embolism in six (3%) patients, and sepsis in five (3%) patients in the vorinostat group. Two (67%) of three on-treatment deaths with mogamulizumab (due to sepsis and polymyositis) and three (33%) of nine on-treatment deaths with vorinostat (two due to pulmonary embolism and one due to bronchopneumonia) were considered treatment-related.Mogamulizumab significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with vorinostat, and could provide a new, effective treatment for patients with mycosis fungoides and, importantly, for Sézary syndrome, a subtype that represents a major therapeutic challenge in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.Kyowa Kirin.