Search

Background In current practice, rates of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) are low due to the use of the total mesorectal excision (TME) in combination with various neoadjuvant treatment strategies. However, the literature on LRRC mainly consists of single- and multicenter retrospective cohort studies, which are prone to selection bias. The aim of this study is to provide a nationwide, population-based overview of LRRC after TME in the Netherlands. Patients and Methods In total, 1431 patients with nonmetastasized primary rectal cancer diagnosed in the first six months of 2015 and treated with TME were included from the nationwide, population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data on disease recurrence were collected for patients diagnosed in these 6 months only. Competing risk cumulative incidence, competing risk regression, and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to assess incidence, risk factors, treatment, and overall survival (OS) of LRRC. Results Three-year cumulative incidence of LRRC was 6.4%; synchronous distant metastases (LRRC-M1) were present in 44.9% of patients with LRRC. Distal localization, R1–2 margin, (y)pT3-4, and (y)pN1-2 were associated with an increased LRRC rate. No differences in LRRC treatment and OS were found between patients who had been treated with or without prior n(C)RT. Curative-intent treatment was given to 42.9% of patients with LRRC, and 3-year OS thereafter was 70%. Conclusions Nationwide LRRC incidence was low. A high proportion of patients with LRRC underwent curative-intent treatment, and OS of this group was high in comparison with previous studies. Additionally, n(C)RT for primary rectal cancer was not associated with differences in treatment and OS of LRRC.

Item does not contain fulltext 01 juli 2023

BACKGROUND: Omentoplasty is a commonly performed procedure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer, but its effectiveness to reduce pelviperineal complications is not firmly established. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of omentoplasty on short-term pelviperineal complications and postoperative outcomes following long-course (chemo)radiotherapy and abdominoperineal resection in patients with locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Single center. PATIENTS: All patients with locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer undergoing abdominoperineal resection after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation in a tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to examine the association between omentoplasty and pelviperineal complications (e.g., perineal wound problems and pelvic abscesses), duration of nasogastric tube drainage and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 305 patients were analysed of which 245 underwent omentoplasty (80%). Pelviperineal complications occurred in 151 patients (50%) overall, and in 125 (51%) and 26 (43%) of patients with or without omentoplasty, respectively. Independent predictors of pelviperineal complications in multivariable analyses were smoking (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.46 - 4.94) and high BMI (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.00 - 2.83), but not omentoplasty (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.77-2.40). Mean duration of nasogastric tube drainage was longer after omentoplasty (6 vs. 4 days) with a significant association in multivariable analysis (β-coefficient 1.97, 95% CI 0.35-3.59). Patients undergoing omentoplasty had a significantly longer hospital stay (14 vs. 10 days), and omentoplasty remained associated with a prolonged hospital stay after adjusting for confounding (β-coefficient 3.05, 95% CI 0.05-5.74). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design. CONCLUSION: Omentoplasty was not associated with a reduced risk of the occurrence of short-term pelviperineal complications after abdominoperineal resection in patients undergoing long-course (chemo)radiotherapy. Furthermore, in patients undergoing omentoplasty a prolonged duration of nasogastric tube drainage and hospital stay was observed. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C124.

PURPOSE: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT), delivered by intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) or high-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy (HDR-IORT), may reduce the local recurrence rate in patients with locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LARC and LRRC, respectively). The aim of this study was to compare the oncological outcomes between both IORT modalities in patients with LARC or LRRC who underwent a microscopic irradical (R1) resection.METHODS: All consecutive patients who received IORT because of an R1 resection of LARC or LRRC between 2000 and 2016 in two tertiary referral centers were included. In LARC, a resection margin of ≤2 mm was considered R1. A resection margin of 0 mm was considered R1 in LRRC.RESULTS: In total, 215 patients with LARC were included, of whom 151 (70%) received IOERT and 64 (30%) received HDR-IORT; in addition, 158 patients with LRRC were included, of whom 112 (71%) received IOERT and 46 (29%) received HDR-IORT. After multivariable analyses, the overall survival was not significantly different between the two IORT modalities. The local recurrence-free survival was significantly longer in patients treated with HDR-IORT, both in LARC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.496; 95% CI, 0.253-0.973; P = .041) and LRRC (HR, 0.567; 95% CI, 0.349-0.920; P = .021). In patients with LARC, major postoperative complications were similar for both IORT modalities (IOERT, 30%; HDR-IORT, 27%), whereas in patients with LRRC, the incidence of major postoperative complications was higher after HDR-IORT (IOERT, 26%; HDR-IORT, 46%).CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a significantly better local recurrence-free survival in favor of HDR-IORT in patients with an R1 resection for LARC or LRRC. Optimization of the IOERT technique seems warranted.

Aim: To describe the incidence, treatment and survival of patients with rare types of rectal malignancies in the Netherlands. Methods: Data of patients with rectal malignancies diagnosed in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2018 were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and grouped according to the RARECARE cancer list. Age-standardised incidence rates were calculated using the European Standard Rate. The Joinpoint Regression Program was used for analysing trends and joinpoints and for the estimation of annual percentage changes (APCs). Patient characteristics, treatment details and relative survival (RS) were reported for different histological types of rectal malignancies and compared between different time periods. RS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. Results: A total of 88,299 cases of rectal malignancies were included of which 2125 (2.5%) were categorised as rare histological subtypes. The incidence of rectal neuro-endocrine tumours (NET) (APC: 6.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4%; 7.1%), rectal sarcoma (APC: 5.8%, 95% CI: 2.9%; 8.7%) and rectal adenocarcinoma (APC 1.0%, 95% CI: 0.26%; 1.8%) increased. Prognosis was best in patients with rectal NET (5-year RS: 72.4%, 95% CI: 70.1%; 74.7%) and worst in patients with rectal melanoma (5-year RS: 8.9%, 95% CI: 5.1%; 15.7%). RS has improved in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma, rectal sarcoma and rectal lymphoma in 2008–2018 (p-values p < 0.001, p = 0.023 and p = 0.029). Conclusion: Significant increases in incidence were observed for different types of rectal malignancies. Differences in incidence, treatment and survival found in this study could be useful to make clinicians aware of specific diseases.

Introduction: Recurrence risk after curative surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains high, underlining the need for novel prognostic markers. Liquid biopsies provide promising biomarkers to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) after local treatment. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the characteristics of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in liquid biopsies taken before and after surgical treatment of CRLM. Materials & Methods: Patients with isolated CRLM were recruited before undergoing potentially curative hepatic resection. Only patients who did not receive per-operative chemotherapy were selected. Peripheral blood samples were collected in CellSave preservative tubes at four different time points and processed into plasma within 96 hours after withdrawal. Subsequently, cfDNA was isolated from 4mL plasma, in which the total cfDNA concentration was measured. Mutations characterizing ctDNA were determined before surgery by next generation sequencing (NGS) using a colon-specific targeted panel (Oncomine Colon cfDNA assay, 14 genes). Samples were sequenced at >20.000 average reads depth and variants were called mutations when the variant allele frequency was above their predefined limit of detection. Longitudinal blood samples of ctDNA-positive patients were evaluated by digital PCR (dPCR) using mutation-specific assays, in which samples were considered ctDNA positive when >5 mutant copies were detected. Results: Blood samples of 231 patients were collected one day before surgery (T0), and were repeated one day (T1), one week (T2), and three weeks (T3) after surgery. The cfDNA yields per mL plasma were higher at T1 and T2 (median 93 ng and 64 ng, respectively) compared to T0 (6 ng, p Discussion/Conclusion: ctDNA is a potential biomarker to detect MRD after curative treatment for CRLM. Our results demonstrate that out of all patients with detectable ctDNA at baseline (before surgery), ctDNA is still present in 36% of patients three weeks after resection. Citation Format: Lissa Wullaert, Maurice P. Jansen, Jaco Kraan, Jan M. van Rees, Corine M. Beaufort, Yannick M. Meyer, Boris Galjart, Pieter M. Nierop, Florian E. Buisman, Diederik J. Höppener, Erik P. van der Stok, Gianmarco Motta, Dirk J. Grünhagen, Henk M. Verheul, Stefan Sleijfer, Saskia M. Wilting, Cornelis Verhoef, John W. Martens. Circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer patients with resectable liver metastases: Preliminary results of the MIRACLE study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5715.

Background Pelvic exenteration for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent (LRRC) rectal cancer provides radical resection and local control, but is associated with considerable morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors, including nutritional status and body composition, for postoperative morbidity and survival after pelvic exenteration in patients with LARC or LRRC. Methods Patients with LARC or LRRC who underwent total or posterior pelvic exenteration in a tertiary referral centre from 2003 to 2018 were analysed retrospectively. Nutritional status was assessed using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST). Body composition was estimated using standard-of-care preoperative CT of the abdomen. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for complications with a Clavien–Dindo grade of III or higher. Risk factors for impaired overall survival were calculated using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results In total, 227 patients who underwent total (111) or posterior (116) pelvic exenteration were analysed. Major complications (Clavien–Dindo grade at least III) occurred in 82 patients (36.1 per cent). High risk of malnutrition (MUST score 2 or higher) was the only risk factor for major complications (odds ratio 3.99, 95 per cent c.i. 1.76 to 9.02) in multivariable analysis. Mean follow-up was 44.6 months. LRRC (hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95 per cent c.i. 1.04 to 2.48) and lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.20, 1.38 to 3.51) were independent risk factors for impaired overall survival. Conclusion A high risk of malnutrition according to the MUST is a strong risk factor for major complications in patients with LARC or LRRC undergoing exenteration surgery., The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for postoperative morbidity and survival after pelvic exenteration in patients with locally advanced and locally recurrent rectal cancer. A high risk of malnutrition according to the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool was identified as a strong risk factor for major complications in patients undergoing exenteration surgery.