Search

Background: The aim of this single-center retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes after the convergent procedure (CP) for treatment of AF. Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of patients that underwent CP from January 2009 until July 2020. A total of 119 patients with paroxysmal AF (23.5%), persistent AF (5.9%), or long-standing persistent AF (70.6%) that attended long-term follow-up were included. The outcomes were assessed 1 year after the CP and at long-term follow-up. At the 1-year follow-up, rhythm and AF burden were assessed for patients with an implantable loop recorder (61.2%). For others, rhythm was assessed by clinical presentation and 12-lead ECG. At long-term follow-up, patients with sinus rhythm (SR) or an unclear history were assessed with a 7-day Holter ECG monitor, and AF burden was determined. Long-term success was defined as freedom from AF/atrial flutter (AFL) with SR on a 12-lead ECG and AF/AFL burden < 1% on the 7-day Holter ECG. Results: At 1-year follow-up, 91.4% of patients had SR and 76.1% of patients had AF/AFL burden < 1%. At long-term follow-up (8.3 ± 2.8 years), 65.5% of patients had SR and 53.8% of patients had AF/AFL burden < 1% on the 7-day Holter ECG. Additional RFAs were performed in 32.8% of patients who had AF or AFL burden < 1%. At long-term follow-up, age, body mass index, and left atrial volume index were associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence. Conclusions: CP resulted in high long-term probability of SR maintenance. During long-term follow-up, additional RFAs were required to maintain SR in a substantial number of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Primary prevention patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and chronic total occlusion of an infarct-related coronary artery (CTO) are at a particularly high risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy occurrence. The trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of preventive CTO-related substrate ablation strategy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation. Methods and results The PREVENTIVE VT study was a prospective, multicentre, randomized trial including ischaemic patients with ejection fraction ≤40%, no documented ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and evidence of scar related to the coronary CTO. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive substrate ablation before ICD implantation or standard therapy with ICD implantation only. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization for VAs. Secondary outcomes included the primary outcome's components, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Sixty patients were included in the study. During the mean follow-up of 44.7 ± 20.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (16.7%) patients undergoing preventive substrate ablation and in 13 (43.3%) patients receiving only ICD [hazard ratio (HR): 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12–0.94; P = 0.037]. Patients in the preventive ablation group also had fewer appropriate ICD therapies (P = 0.039) and the electrical storms (Log-rank: P = 0.01). While preventive ablation also reduced cardiac hospitalizations (P = 0.006), it had no significant impact on CV mortality (P = 0.151). Conclusion Preventive ablation of the coronary CTO-related substrate in patients undergoing primary ICD implantation is associated with the reduced risk of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization due to VAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although implantable cardioverter defibrillators offer the best protection against sudden cardiac death, catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) can modify or prevent this event from occurring. In order to achieve a successful ablation, the correct identification of the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate is mandatory to tailor the pre-procedural planning of an ablative procedure as appropriately as possible. We propose that several of the imaging modalities currently used could be merged, including echocardiography (also intracardiac), cardiac magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, nuclear techniques, and electroanatomic mapping. The aim of this state-of-the-art review is to present the value of each modality, that is, its benefits and limitations, in the assessment of arrhythmogenic substrate. Moreover, VAs can be also idiopathic, and in this paper we will underline the role of these techniques in facilitating the ablative procedure. Finally, a hands-on workflow for approaching such a VA and future perspectives will be presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pediatric patients with complete congenital atrio‐ventricular (AV) block are generally exposed to life‐long dyssynchronous right ventricular (RV) pacing. His bundle pacing (HBP) is an alternative method of pacing that better restores physiological ventricular activation which could prevent pacing‐induced cardiomyopathy. We present a case of a 5‐year‐old child with complete AV block who underwent successful permanent HBP implantation. Three‐dimensional electro‐anatomical mapping system was used to facilitate the procedure and reduce the fluoroscopy time. There were no acute procedure‐related complications, and electrical parameters were stable at short‐term follow‐up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Cardiologia Croatica is the property of Croatian Cardiac Society and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aims: Primary prevention patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and chronic total occlusion of an infarct-related coronary artery (CTO) are at a particularly high risk of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy occurrence. The trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of preventive CTO-related substrate ablation strategy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients undergoing primary prevention ICD implantation., Methods and Results: The PREVENTIVE VT study was a prospective, multicentre, randomized trial including ischaemic patients with ejection fraction ≤40%, no documented ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and evidence of scar related to the coronary CTO. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to a preventive substrate ablation before ICD implantation or standard therapy with ICD implantation only. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization for VAs. Secondary outcomes included the primary outcome's components, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies, cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Sixty patients were included in the study. During the mean follow-up of 44.7 ± 20.7 months, the primary outcome occurred in 5 (16.7%) patients undergoing preventive substrate ablation and in 13 (43.3%) patients receiving only ICD [hazard ratio (HR): 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12-0.94; P = 0.037]. Patients in the preventive ablation group also had fewer appropriate ICD therapies (P = 0.039) and the electrical storms (Log-rank: P = 0.01). While preventive ablation also reduced cardiac hospitalizations (P = 0.006), it had no significant impact on CV mortality (P = 0.151)., Conclusion: Preventive ablation of the coronary CTO-related substrate in patients undergoing primary ICD implantation is associated with the reduced risk of appropriate ICD therapy or unplanned hospitalization due to VAs., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: D.Ž. reports receiving proctoring fees and speaker honoraria from Medtronic, Biotronik, Abbott, and Boston Scientific. M.J. reports receiving consulting fees from Medtronic and proctoring fees from Biosense Webster. A.Z.M reports receiving proctoring fees from Abbott. B.A. reports receiving proctoring fees from Biosense Webster. J.Š. reports receiving consulting fees from Medtronic, Biotronik and Biosense Webster. Other authors report no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)