Search

Objectives A short-stay endovascular aneurysm repair (SS-EVAR) pathway for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms offers the potential to improve service efficiency and patient satisfaction by reducing the hospital length of stay. This study aimed to determine whether the implementation of a novel set of patient selection criteria for a theoretical SS-EVAR pathway could facilitate an expansion of the proportion of suitable patients, whilst maintaining patient safety and limiting unplanned emergency readmissions. Methods Two SS-EVAR selection criteria (low and high risk) were generated based upon patient pre-operative comorbidities. The low risk criteria essentially selected fit and healthy individuals, whereas the high risk criteria included patients with a range of comorbidities that could still theoretically enable enrolment onto a SS-EVAR pathway. A retrospective analysis, whereby both criteria were applied to all elective EVARs recorded in the National Vascular Registry between 2013 and 2016 at a single tertiary vascular unit was performed. Rates and timings of postoperative complications, reinterventions and unplanned readmissions for patients meeting each criteria were assessed. Results In total, 188 patients were included (92% male, mean age 75.4 ± 7.2 years). Twenty-nine patients (15%) met the low risk criteria. Two (7%) of these experienced an inpatient complication which were both detected within 24 h of operation (including one who required reintervention), and no patients in this group had an unplanned readmission within 30 days. One-hundred and ten patients (59%) met our high risk criteria and 19 (17%) experienced an inpatient complication, with 4 (4%) of these occurring beyond 24 h post-EVAR (three urinary problems and one acute on chronic kidney injury). Six (6%) of these patients required a reintervention; however, all of these complications were detected within 24 h. Two (2%) high risk cohort patients required unplanned readmission within 30 days for a femoral pseudoaneurysm and musculoskeletal back pain. Conclusions With high risk patient selection criteria and appropriate post-operative safeguards, up to 60% of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms patients could be safely enrolled onto a next-day discharge SS-EVAR pathway with minimal readmissions, thus allowing more effective resource utilisation.

The timing of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis has evolved in practice over time. Key landmark trials outlined the benefit of performing CEA in the recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, defined as revascularisation within 6 months of the index neurological event. Further evidence and sub-analysis demonstrate that performing CEA within 2 weeks of symptoms has the maximal benefit in reducing stroke free survival and is associated with a safe perioperative complication profile. This has translated into guideline recommendations and widespread clinical practice. The case for performing urgent CEA (within 48 hours of index neurological event) over early CEA (within 2 weeks) has been put forward and studied. Data examining perioperative complications for urgent CEA are mostly derived from retrospective single series studies. A moderate balance exists in the literature for the safety and risk of urgent CEA. Although many studies present acceptable perioperative stroke and mortality rates associated with urgent CEA, evidence still exists that the perioperative complications may not be insignificant. This is particularly the case if the presenting neurology is a stroke, rather than a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or amaurosis fugax. This should be contextualised in the practice of modern aggressive medical therapy with dual antiplatelets and statins, with evidence suggesting a reduction in recurrent ischaemic events prior to surgical intervention. Careful patient selection, presenting neurology and medical therapy is likely to be a key feature in considering urgent CEA versus early CEA.

INTRODUCTION Short stay endovascular aneurysm repair pathways (SS-EVAR) provide potential advantages to both healthcare providers and patients. However, these benefits must be carefully balanced against the inherent risks to patient safety and tariff penalties associated with unplanned readmissions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature review was performed using the databases MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library up until March 2019. Search terms used included "endovascular aneurysm repair," "aneurysm repair," "EVAR," "abdominal aortic aneurysm," "day case," "short stay," "fast track," and "ambulatory." EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Nine relevant articles (including one prior review on the topic) were identified. This early data suggests that SS-EVAR is associated with good patient satisfaction and modest cost savings for healthcare providers. Patient selection, preoperative preparation and supported discharge with early follow-up are essential components of a SS-EVAR pathway. Increasingly, SS-EVAR tends to be delivered via bilateral percutaneous access and loco-regional anesthesia. Over 70% of patients enrolled onto SS-EVAR pathways successfully complete them. Long procedures with excessive blood loss are associated with pathway non-completion. All serious complications occur within 6 hours of the procedure and the mortality (0-1%), morbidity (8-58%) and readmission rates (0-6%) associated with SS-EVAR remains acceptably low. SS-EVAR pathways can be safely and effectively implemented in both teaching and non-teaching hospitals. CONCLUSIONS Short-stay EVAR pathways are safe and acceptable to patients. With appropriate selection of motivated patients, successful expedited discharge can be achieved with limited readmissions, thus facilitating increased resource efficiency and cost savings for healthcare providers.

Objective The study aimed to assess the cumulative radiation exposure from preoperative, periprocedural, and follow-up imaging to patients who underwent common endovascular deep venous interventions for acute and chronic central venous outflow obstructive diseases; namely, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) thrombolysis, unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, and inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction in a single center. Methods Patients who had DVT thrombolysis of upper extremity (UE) DVT and lower extremity (LE) DVT, unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, and endovascular IVC reconstruction between May 1, 2012, and July 31, 2017, in a single unit were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, anatomic DVT, imaging, technical details of the index procedure, follow-up, and radiation exposure measured in dose-length product, dose-area product (DAP), and fluoroscopy time (FT) from related computed tomography scans and interventions were analyzed. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to assess for significance of differences between subgroups. A P value of less than .05 was considered significant. Results In total, 20 UE DVT thrombolysis, 91 LE DVT thrombolysis, 56 unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, and 39 endovascular IVC reconstruction patients were included in the study, with the following median ages: 39 years (range, 20-67 years), 44 years (range, 15-78 years), 45 years (range, 20-80 years), and 35 years (range, 18 -73 years), respectively. The median cumulative DAP for the index DVT thrombolysis was 9.2 Gycm2 (range, 0.2-176.0 Gycm2) for LE DVT and 2.0 Gycm2 (range, 0.1-11.7 Gycm2) for UE DVT (P Conclusions Patient radiation exposure for endovascular deep venous interventions for central venous outflow obstruction measured in DAP and FT seemed to be less than and at most similar to anatomically comparable arterial interventions in the literature. However, these patients were usually much younger than those with arterial diseases and may need secondary interventions involving further radiation exposure in their lifetime.

Acute (ALI) and chronic limb ischaemic (CLI) make up a major part of the workload of vascular surgeons and carry considerable morbidity and mortality. Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the major cause of these conditions. Diagnosis of these conditions involves proper use of imaging including duplex ultrasound, computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), as well as invasive techniques like digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Management ranges from conservative techniques, the mainstay of management in intermittent claudication (IC), with medical optimization, through to endovascular and open revascularization techniques in CLI and ALI. Finally where no revascularization options exist, primary amputation or palliation must be considered.

Various "scarless" approaches have been described for thyroid and parathyroid surgery. The objective of the current study was to investigate patients' perception of neck scar cosmesis, its impact on quality of life (QoL) and evaluate patient preference with regards to scar location.120 patients undergoing thyroid or parathyroid surgery were followed-up over a 5-year period (2008-2013). Validated tools were used to assess scar perception and its impact on QoL. These were evaluated against sex, age, ethnicity, operation type, histopathology, time following surgery and scar length.Mean follow-up was 2.6 ± 3.8 years. One of the most common post-operative problems was scar-related (n = 18). Caucasian patients and those with benign histology expressed a lower impact on QoL (p 0.001, p = 0.038). Sex and scar length did not significantly affect patients' perception for scar cosmesis (p 0.05). Clinicians tended to score scar cosmesis higher than patients (p = 0.02). Most participants (75%) expressed a clear preference for an extracervical "scar-less in the neck" approach.Scar-related issues are frequently reported following thyroid and parathyroid surgery. The negative impact, often underestimated by clinicians, is more apparent amongst Asian and Afro-Caribbean patients and can significantly impact on their QoL. This, combined with the lack of correlation between scar length and patient satisfaction, indicates the need to divert research from miniaturising neck scars to concealing them in extracervical sites.Patients prefer a scar-less in the neck approach when given the option. A prospective comparative study is required to compare the cervical and extracervical approaches.

Background: Small bowel obstruction is a common emergency general surgical presentation with multiple possible causes. Small bowel metastases from a primary lung cancer is unusual with one study showing only 0.9% of patients with primary lung cancer will have metastasis to the small bowel.Methods: We present a case of a 66-year-old fit male who was admitted at the Accident and Emergency Department unwell and septic with clinical and radiological findings of small bowel obstruction.Results: The patient resuscitated and brought to operation theatres despite no obvious cause of the obstruction in the Computerised Tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis. Laparotomy revealed small bowel obstruction secondary to an intraluminal small bowel lesion. Post-operative CT scan chest and histopathology of the excised lesion showed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the small bowel from a newly diagnosed lung cancer. Post operatively, patient initially recovered well but he deteriorated rapidly due to hospital acquired pneumonia and passed away 15 days after initial presentation.Conclusion: The case highlights the need to be cognizant of rarer causes of common emergency general surgical complaints.

Endovascular surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) was first described in 1994, but only recently has there been robust evidence to support it as a definite alternative to open surgical repair. Randomized controlled trial evidence comes in the form of the AJAX, ECAR, and IMPROVE trials, with the latter mirroring current clinical practice most closely. IMPROVE has shown that endovascular surgery for rAAA is as effective as open surgical repair, allows for shorter hospital stays, offers a greater advantage for women, and is cost-effective, and these results have been borne out in an individual patient meta-analysis of all three studies. It is vital in the modern era that centers offering repair of rAAA should offer both open surgical and endovascular approaches to patients appropriately. Analysis of results with reference to aortic morphology has demonstrated that the biggest future gains in mortality are likely to occur in patients with short aortic necks, and this is an area that should be the focus of development in open and endovascular repair.

Introduction Transaxillary robotic thyroid surgery was pioneered in South Korea where cultural factors, anthropometry and remuneration favour this. Small thyroid nodules account for the majority of cases due to a national thyroid cancer screening programme. However, the technique has not been evaluated in the United Kingdom where larger thyroid nodules tend to undergo surgery in a patient population with a higher body mass index (BMI). Methods Long term prospective non-randomised study. Sixteen consecutive robotic hemithyroidectomy patients were compared to 16 open controls. Results There were no robotic conversions to open and no significant difference regarding pain, voice, or quality of life (QoL). In the robotic group, long term. scar cosmesis at 3 years was superior (p = 0.02) although the operative time was significantly longer (228 min vs. 85 min, p = 0.01). One patient had a transient recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis and another had temporary shoulder dysfunction. Both resolved in 4 weeks. Discussion This study highlights the considerable difference between a Western patient population compared to South East Asia. Despite this robotic thyroidectomy is feasible and safe in a UK population. Conclusions Despite a low uptake in the UK compared to the Far East, robotic thyroidectomy represents a viable option for selected patients, achieving superior cosmesis compared with conventional thyroidectomy at the expense of time and cost. The key is careful patient selection. A randomised study is needed to establish the clinical efficacy compared to conventional surgery in this population.

Objective: 1) To assess the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the robotic approach compared with conventional targeted minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. 2) To evaluate whether the absence of a neck scar associated with the robotic approach offers any advantage(s) over conventional targeted minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. 3) To compare patient satisfaction between the 2 techniques.Method: Prospective case control study of 30 patients that underwent targeted parathyroidectomy over 4 years (May 2009-February 2012) in a tertiary referral endocrine center. Fifteen patients had a robotic and 15 an endoscopic approach. Outcomes assessed included operative time, blood loss, biochemistry, pain, scar cosmesis, voice, quality of life, and complications.Results: In all cases the parathyroid adenoma was successfully removed. There was 1 robotic conversion. Mean robotic operative time was approximately double that of the conventional approach. There were no significant differences in mean blood loss...

To validate the VOXEL-MAN TempoSurg simulator for temporal bone dissection.Prospective international study.Otolaryngology departments of 2 academic health care institutions in the United Kingdom and United States.Eighty-five subjects were recruited consisting of an experienced and referent group. Participants performed a standardized familiarization session and temporal bone dissection task. Realism, training effectiveness, and global impressions were evaluated across 21 domains using a 5-point Likert-type scale. A score of 4 was the minimum threshold for acceptability.The experienced group comprised 25 otolaryngology trainers who had performed 150 mastoid operations. The referent group comprised 60 trainees (mean otolaryngology experience of 2.9 years). Familiarization took longer in the experienced group (P = .01). User-friendliness was positively rated (mean score 4.1). Seventy percent of participants rated anatomical appearance as acceptable. Trainers rated drill ergonomics worse than did trainees (P = .01). Simulation temporal bone training scored highly (mean score 4.3). Surgical anatomy, drill navigation, and hand-eye coordination accounted for this. Trainees were more likely to recommend temporal bone simulation to a colleague than were trainers (P = .01). Transferability of skills to the operating room was undecided (mean score 3.5).Realism of the VOXEL-MAN virtual reality temporal bone simulator is suboptimal in its current version. Nonetheless, it represents a useful adjunct to existing training methods and is particularly beneficial for novice surgeons before performing cadaveric temporal bone dissection. Improvements in realism, specifically drill ergonomics and visual-spatial perception during deeper temporal bone dissection, are warranted.