1. Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease in high risk B-ALL: a report from Children’s Oncology Group study AALL0232
- Author
-
Stephen P. Hunger, James B. Nachman, Nyla A. Heerema, Michael J. Borowitz, Elizabeth A. Raetz, Eric Larsen, Wanda L. Salzer, Mignon L. Loh, Cheryl L. Willman, Meenakshi Devidas, Naomi J. Winick, William L. Carroll, Brent L. Wood, Andrew J. Carroll, Yunfeng Dai, and Julie M. Gastier-Foster
- Subjects
Male ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Asparaginase ,Neoplasm, Residual ,Clinical Trials and Observations ,Immunology ,Leucovorin ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Kaplan-Meier Estimate ,Biochemistry ,Dexamethasone ,Disease-Free Survival ,Maintenance Chemotherapy ,Polyethylene Glycols ,law.invention ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Randomized controlled trial ,Risk Factors ,Prednisone ,law ,Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Child ,Proportional Hazards Models ,Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ,Proportional hazards model ,business.industry ,Induction chemotherapy ,Induction Chemotherapy ,Cell Biology ,Hematology ,Flow Cytometry ,Prognosis ,Minimal residual disease ,body regions ,Methotrexate ,chemistry ,Child, Preschool ,Female ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) is highly prognostic in pediatric B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). In Children's Oncology Group high-risk B-ALL study AALL0232, we investigated MRD in subjects randomized in a 2 × 2 factorial design to receive either high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) or Capizzi methotrexate (C-MTX) during interim maintenance (IM) or prednisone or dexamethasone during induction. Subjects with end-induction MRD ≥0.1% or those with morphologic slow early response were nonrandomly assigned to receive a second IM and delayed intensification phase. MRD was measured by 6-color flow cytometry in 1 of 2 reference labs, with excellent agreement between the two. Subjects with end-induction MRD0.01% had a 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 87% ± 1% vs 74% ± 4% for those with MRD 0.01% to 0.1%; increasing MRD amounts was associated with progressively worse outcome. Subjects converting from MRD positive to negative by end consolidation had a relatively favorable 79% ± 5% 5-year disease-free survival vs 39% ± 7% for those with MRD ≥0.01%. Although HD-MTX was superior to C-MTX, MRD retained prognostic significance in both groups (86% ± 2% vs 58% ± 4% for MRD-negative vs positive C-MTX subjects; 88% ± 2% vs 68% ± 4% for HD-MTX subjects). Intensified therapy given to subjects with MRD0.1% did not improve either 5-year EFS or overall survival (OS). However, these subjects showed an early relapse rate similar to that seen in MRD-negative ones, with EFS/OS curves for patients with 0.1% to 1% MRD crossing those with 0.01% to 0.1% MRD at 3 and 4 years, thus suggesting that the intensified therapy altered the disease course of MRD-positive subjects. Additional interventions targeted at the MRD-positive group may further improve outcome. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00075725.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF