Search

Although contemporary chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed with high success rates, 10% to 13% of patients presenting with CTOs have chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the comparative safety, efficacy, and health status benefit of CTO PCI in these patients, has not been well defined. We examined the association of baseline renal function with periprocedural major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events and health status outcomes in 957 consecutive patients (mean age 65.3 ± 10.3 years, 19.4% women, 90.3% white, 23.6 CKD [estimated glomerular filtration rate {eGFR}60]) in the OPEN-CTO (Outcomes, Patients Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic Total Occlusions Registry) study. Hierarchical multivariable regression models were used to examine the independent association of baseline eGFR with technical success, periprocedural complications and change in health status, using Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) over 1 year. Crude rates of acute kidney injury were higher (13.5% vs 4.4%, p0.001) and technical success lower (81.8% vs 88.4%, p = 0.01) in patients with CKD. There were no significant differences in other periprocedural complications. After adjustment for confounding factors, there was no significant association of baseline eGFR with technical success or periprocedural major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (death, myocardial infarction, emergent bypass surgery, stroke, perforation), whereas patients with lower eGFR had higher rates of acute kidney injury. The difference in SAQ summary score, between patients on the 10th and 90th percentile for baseline eGFR distribution was not clinically significant (1 month: -0.91; 1 year: -3.06 points). In conclusion, CTO PCI success, complication rates, and the health status improvement after CTO PCI are similar in patients across a range of baseline eGFRs.

Objectives We sought to determine the impact of subintimal plaque modification (SPM) on early health status following unsuccessful chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI. Background Intentionally dilating the subintimal space during unsuccessful CTO PCI to facilitate flow through dissection planes and improve success of repeat PCI attempts is a technique used by some hybrid operators, and may improve health status by restoring distal vessel flow despite unsuccessful CTO PCI. Methods We studied 138 patients who underwent unsuccessful CTO PCI in a 12-center CTO PCI registry. Safety was assessed by comparing in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing unsuccessful CTO PCI with and without SPM. The association between SPM and health status was quantified using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire Summary Score (SAQ SS), and the association between SPM and SAQ SS was determined using multivariable regression. Results SPM was performed in 59 patients (42.8%). Complication rates were similar comparing those with and without SPM. At 1-month, patients treated with SPM had larger increases in SAQ SS compared to patients who were not (28.3 ± 21.7 vs. 16.8 ±20.2, P = 0.012), and SPM was associated with an adjusted mean 10.5 point (95% CI 1.4-19.7, P = 0.02) greater SAQ SS improvement through 30 days. Conclusion SPM was performed in almost half of unsuccessful CTO PCIs and was not associated with increased procedural complications. SPM was independently associated with better patient-reported health status at 30 days. Further studies are needed to assess the necessity of subsequent PCI in patients with significant health status improvements after SPM.

Michael J. Wolk, MD, MACC, Moderator Manesh R. Patel, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI, Writing Group Liaison Gregory J. Dehmer, MD, MACC, FSCAI, FAHA, Writing Group Liaison [∗][1] Peter K. Smith, MD, FACC, Writing Group Liaison James C. Blankenship, MD, MACC, MSCAI[‡][2] Alfred A. Bove, MD, PhD

The American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and American Association for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, have completed a 2-part revision of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization. In prior coronary revascularization AUC documents, indications for revascularization in acute coronary syndromes and stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) were combined into 1 document. To address the expanding clinical indications for coronary revascularization, and to align the subject matter with the most current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, the new AUC for coronary artery revascularization were separated into 2 documents addressing SIHD and acute coronary syndromes individually. This document presents the AUC for SIHD.Clinical scenarios were developed to mimic patient presentations encountered in everyday practice. These scenarios included information on symptom status; risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing; coronary disease burden; and, in some scenarios, fractional flow reserve testing, presence or absence of diabetes, and SYNTAX score. This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios that the writing group felt were affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria. The methodology used in this update is similar to the initial document but employs the recent modifications in the methods for developing AUC, most notably, alterations in the nomenclature for appropriate use categorization.A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range of 4 to 6 indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario.As seen with the prior coronary revascularization AUC, revascularization in clinical scenarios with high symptom burden, high-risk features, and high coronary disease burden, as well as in patients receiving antianginal therapy, are deemed appropriate. Additionally, scenarios assessing the appropriateness of revascularization before kidney transplantation or transcatheter valve therapy are now rated. The primary objective of the AUC is to provide a framework for the assessment of practice patterns that will hopefully improve physician decision making.

Michael J. Wolk, MD, MACC, Moderator Manesh R. Patel, MD, FACC, FAHA, FSCAI, Writing Group Liaison Gregory J. Dehmer, MD, MACC, MSCAI, FACP, FAHA, Writing Group Liaison [ ∗ ][1] Peter K. Smith, MD, FACC, Writing Group Liaison James C. Blankenship, MD, MACC[‡][2] Alfred A. Bove, MD, PhD

The association between body mass index (BMI) and health status (HS) outcomes after chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are unknown. 1000 consecutive patients enrolled in 12 center prospective CTO PCI study (OPEN-CTO) were categorized into 3 groups by baseline BMI

Perforation is the most frequent complication of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with adverse events including mortality. Among 1000 consecutive patients enrolled in 12 center prospective CTO PCI study (OPEN CTO), all perforations were

Introduction Women have been under-represented in trials. Due to the dearth of information about CTO-PCI in women and discordance of previous results, sex differences in outcomes in the OPEN-CTO Trial were investigated. Methods OPEN-CTO is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective observational registry of consecutive CTO patients undergoing PCI at 12 U.S. centers. The one-year outcomes of this trial stratified by sex were examined. Optimal propensity matching was performed to compare outcomes between sexes. Multivariate conditional logistic regression modeling for predictors of procedural success was performed. Results Women represented 19.6% of the cohort (196/1,000 patients). Women were more likely to report dyspnea as their predominant symptom. Women reported statistically worse physical limitation and poorer quality of life as compared to men. J-CTO scores were similar in males and females. Technical, procedural success and MACE rates were similar in both sexes. Contrast and radiation doses were however significantly lower in women. The SAQ- summary score, RDS, EQ-5D VAS, PHQ-8 scores were all improved to the same degree at 1 year in women as compared to men. Predictors of procedural success revealed that younger age, lower J-CTO score and absence of prior CABG were predictors of procedural success. Sex did not predict procedural success or 1-year MACE in this regression model. Conclusion This real-world registry revealed that women derive the same benefit from CTO-PCI as men without additional complications and with favorable health status outcomes at 1 year. Consideration of revascularization by PCI in symptomatic women should be considered as part of the treatment when appropriate.

The American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and American Association for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, have completed a 2-part revision of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization. In prior coronary revascularization AUC documents, indications for revascularization in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and stable ischemic heart disease were combined into 1 document. To address the expanding clinical indications for coronary revascularization, and in an effort to align the subject matter with the most current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, the new AUC for coronary artery revascularization were separated into 2 documents addressing ACS and stable ischemic heart disease individually. This document presents the AUC for ACS. Clinical scenarios were developed to mimic patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included information on symptom status, presence of clinical instability or ongoing ischemic symptoms, prior reperfusion therapy, risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing, fractional flow reserve testing, and coronary anatomy. This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios that the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria. The methodology used in this update is similar to the initial document but employs the recent modifications in the methods for developing AUC, most notably, alterations in the nomenclature for appropriate use categorization. A separate, independent rating panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate that revascularization is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario, whereas scores in the mid-range (4 to 6) indicate that coronary revascularization may be appropriate for the clinical scenario. Seventeen clinical scenarios were developed by a writing committee and scored by the rating panel: 10 were identified as appropriate, 6 as may be appropriate, and 1 as rarely appropriate. As seen with the prior coronary revascularization AUC, revascularization in clinical scenarios with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were considered appropriate. Likewise, clinical scenarios with unstable angina and intermediate- or high-risk features were deemed appropriate. Additionally, the management of nonculprit artery disease and the timing of revascularization are now also rated. The primary objective of the AUC is to provide a framework for the assessment of practice patterns that will hopefully improve physician decision making.

To more clearly reflect the relationship between iFR (instantaneous wave-free ratio) and FFR (fractional flow reserve), this Correction document highlights the following changes to the original document published in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology; the version available at JACC [1] has been updated to reflect the changes, with JACC's Correction document available at [2].

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been associated with lower success and worse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO). Whether this reflects greater disease and comorbidity burden in CKD patients, or CKD itself, and the

Perforation is the most frequent complication of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with adverse events including mortality. The retrograde approach has been reported to have higher complication rates than the antegrade approach. However, these

The “hybrid” approach to coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) crossing was developed to optimize procedural efficacy, efficiency, and safety. We examined the procedural techniques and outcomes of 639 consecutive CTO percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed using the “hybrid”

We sought to validate the clinical utility of the J-CTO score in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The records of 650 patients who underwent CTO PCI using the “hybrid” approach at six experienced CTO PCI centers were reviewed. Baseline characteristics and

We sought to examine the efficacy and safety of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the retrograde approach. We compared the outcomes of the retrograde vs. antegrade only approach to CTO PCI among 1,301 procedures performed at 11 US centers between 2012 and

We sought to examine the effect of patient age on the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO). We examined clinical and angiographic data as well as outcomes of 1,216 CTO PCIs performed in 1,195 patients divided into three age groups (