Search

Background: The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains uncertain., Aims: We aimed to compare the effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with STEMI complicated by LVT., Methods: Adult patients with STEMI and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography showing LVT were assigned to rivaroxaban (15 mg once daily) or warfarin (international normalised ratio goal of 2.0-2.5) in an open-label, randomised clinical trial (RCT). A prospective pooled analysis was planned comparing DOAC- versus warfarin-based anticoagulation for the same indication. The main outcome of the RCT was complete LVT resolution at 3 months, determined by a blinded imaging core laboratory. Complete LVT resolution and bleeding were investigated in the pooled analysis., Results: A total of 50 patients (median age: 55 years, 18% females) were enrolled from June 2020 to November 2022. Three-month complete LVT resolution occurred in 19/25 (76.0%) patients assigned to rivaroxaban and 13/24 (54.2%) assigned to warfarin (relative risk [RR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-2.15; p=0.12) with no thrombotic or major bleeding events. Pooled analysis showed numerically better complete LVT resolution with DOACs (rivaroxaban and apixaban; 93/115 [80.8%] vs 79/112 [70.5%], RR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.98-1.32; p=0.08) and less major bleeding (2/116 [1.7%] and 9/112 [8.0%], risk difference -0.06, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.00; p=0.05) than with warfarin., Conclusions: Although the findings are limited by a small sample size, the results suggest that DOACs are safe with at least similar outcomes concerning LVT resolution and major bleeding compared with warfarin. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05705089).

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a chronic, progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline, memory loss, and impaired reasoning. It is the leading cause of dementia in older adults, marked by the pathological accumulation of amyloid-beta plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. These pathological changes lead to widespread neuronal damage, significantly impacting daily functioning and quality of life., Objective: This comprehensive review aims to explore various aspects of Alzheimer's disease, including its epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic advancements, management strategies, caregiving challenges, and emerging therapeutic interventions., Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, from their inception to May 2024. The search strategy incorporated a combination of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms such as "Alzheimer's disease," "epidemiology," "risk factors," "symptoms," "diagnosis," "management," "caregiving," "treatment," and "novel therapies." Boolean operators (AND, OR) were used to refine the search, ensuring a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature on Alzheimer's disease., Results: AD is significantly influenced by genetic predispositions, such as the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele, along with modifiable environmental factors like diet, physical activity, and cognitive engagement. Diagnostic approaches have evolved with advances in neuroimaging techniques (MRI, PET), and biomarker analysis, allowing for earlier detection and intervention. The National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association have updated diagnostic criteria to include biomarker data, enhancing early diagnosis., Conclusion: The management of AD includes pharmacological treatments, such as cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists, which provide symptomatic relief but do not slow disease progression. Emerging therapies, including amyloid-beta and tau-targeting treatments, gene therapy, and immunotherapy, offer potential for disease modification. The critical role of caregivers is underscored, as they face considerable emotional, physical, and financial burdens. Support programs, communication strategies, and educational interventions are essential for improving caregiving outcomes. While significant advancements have been made in understanding and managing AD, ongoing research is necessary to identify new therapeutic targets and enhance diagnostic and treatment strategies. A holistic approach, integrating clinical, genetic, and environmental factors, is essential for addressing the multifaceted challenges of Alzheimer's disease and improving outcomes for both patients and caregivers., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Safiri, Ghaffari Jolfayi, Fazlollahi, Morsali, Sarkesh, Daei Sorkhabi, Golabi, Aletaha, Motlagh Asghari, Hamidi, Mousavi, Jamalkhani, Karamzad, Shamekh, Mohammadinasab, Sullman, Şahin and Kolahi.)

Background:  In the INSPIRATION-S trial, atorvastatin versus placebo was associated with a nonsignificant 16% reduction in 30-day composite of venous/arterial thrombosis or death in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19. Thrombo-inflammatory response in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may last beyond the first 30 days., Methods:  This article reports the effects of atorvastatin 20 mg daily versus placebo on 90-day clinical and functional outcomes from INSPIRATION-S, a double-blind multicenter randomized trial of adult ICU patients with COVID-19. The main outcome for this prespecified study was a composite of adjudicated venous/arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or all-cause mortality. Functional status was assessed with the Post-COVID-19 Functional Scale., Results:  In the primary analysis, 587 patients were included (age: 57 [Q1-Q3: 45-68] years; 44% women). By 90-day follow-up, the main outcome occurred in 96 (33.1%) patients assigned to atorvastatin and 113 (38.0%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.05, p  = 0.11). Atorvastatin in patients who presented within 7 days of symptom onset was associated with reduced 90-day hazard for the main outcome (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.86, p interaction  = 0.02). Atorvastatin use was associated with improved 90-day functional status, although the upper bound CI crossed 1.0 (OR ordinal : 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-1.01, p  = 0.05)., Conclusion:  Atorvastatin 20 mg compared with placebo did not significantly reduce the 90-day composite of death, treatment with ECMO, or venous/arterial thrombosis. However, the point estimates do not exclude a potential clinically meaningful treatment effect, especially among patients who presented within 7 days of symptom onset (NCT04486508)., Competing Interests: D. V. reports consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Rovi, and Sanofi. Dr. Gupta received payment from the Arnold & Porter Law Firm for work related to the Sanofi clopidogrel litigation and from the Ben C. Martin Law Firm for work related to the Cook inferior vena cava filter litigation. A. G. holds equity in a health care telecardiology startup, Heartbeat Health, Inc., and received consulting fees from Edwards LifeSciences. M. V. M. has received support from an institutional grant by the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to Columbia University Irving Medical Center (T32 HL007854). S. S. S. reports honoraria from Janssen and Chiesi and research grant support from the American Heart Association. G. P. has received research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance, Bayer, Janssen, Alexion, Amgen, and Boston Scientific Corporation, and consulting fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance, Boston Scientific Corporation, Janssen, Namsa, Prairie Education and Research Cooperative, Boston Clinical Research Institute, and Amgen. S. A. P. reports being on the Advisory Board for Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, CSI, Philips, Janssen; research grants: Abbott, Boston Scientific, Surmodics, TriReme Medical, Shockwave Medical; and receiving consulting fees from Terumo and Abiomed. M. M. received an unrestricted educational grant for research from Sanofi, Leo, and Rovi, and fees for participating in advisory meetings from Sanofi. A. J. K. reports institutional funding to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Amgen, CSI, Philips, ReCor Medical, Neurotronic, Biotronik, Chiesi, Bolt Medical, Magenta Medical, Canon, SoniVie, Shockwave Medical, and Merck. In addition to research grants, institutional funding includes fees paid to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation for consulting and/or speaking engagements in which Dr. Kirtane controlled the content. Personal: consulting from IMDS; Travel Expenses/Meals from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, CSI, Siemens, Philips, ReCor Medical, Chiesi, OpSens, Zoll, and Regeneron. S. B. reports unrestricted research grants from Bayer, Concept Medical, INARI, Boston Scientific, Bard, and Sanofi; honoraria from Bayer, Concept Medical, INARI, and Boston Scientific. B. W. V. T. has received research support from Novartis, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Olatec Therapeutics, Serpin Pharm, and R-Pharm. He has been a consultant of R-Pharm and Serpin Pharma. G. W. S. has received speaker or other honoraria from Cook, Terumo, and Orchestra Biomed; served as a consultant to Valfix, TherOx, Vascular Dynamics, Robocath, HeartFlow, Gore, Ablative Solutions, Miracor, Neovasc, V-Wave, Abiomed, Ancora, MAIA Pharmaceuticals, Vectorious, Reva, Matrizyme, and Cardiomech; and has received equity or options from Ancora, Cagent, Applied Therapeutics, Biostar family of funds, SpectraWave, Orchestra Biomed, Aria, Cardiac Success, MedFocus family of funds, and Valfix. G. Y. H. L. reports consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo. No fees are received personally. H. M. K. reports personal fees from UnitedHealth, personal fees from IBM Watson Health, personal fees from Element Science, personal fees from Aetna, personal fees from Facebook, personal fees from Siegfried & Jensen Law Firm, personal fees from Arnold & Porter Law Firm, personal fees from Ben C. Martin Law Firm, personal fees from National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, ownership of HugoHealth, ownership of Refactor Health, contracts from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, grants from Medtronic and the Food and Drug Administration, grants from Medtronic and Johnson and Johnson, grants from Shenzhen Center for Health Information, and is a Venture Partner at FPrime. Outside the submitted work. B. B. is supported by a research grant from The Mary Horrigan Connors Center for Women's Health and Gender Biology at Brigham and Women's Hospital. B. B. reports that he is a consulting expert, on behalf of the plaintiff, for litigation related to two specific brand models of IVC filters. All other authors report no relevant disclosures., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis (MS) have bee excluded from all major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)., Methods and Results: In this pilot RCT, 40 patients were randomized to rivaroxaban 20 mg daily or warfarin. No patients experienced symptomatic ischemic strokes and systemic embolic events (the primary composite study outcome) during a 12-month follow-up. No major bleeding was reported. During the follow-up, 18.2% of patients in both groups showed echocardiographic signs of increased thrombogenicity in the left atrial appendage. The rate of silent cerebral ischemia was 13.3% in the rivaroxaban group and 17.6% in the warfarin group at brain magnetic resonance imaging., Conclusion: Our results suggest acceptable efficacy and safety for rivaroxaban in patients with AF and moderate-to-severe MS and are encouraging for larger RCTs in this so far neglected setting (NCT03926156)., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Thrombotic complications are considered among the main extrapulmonary manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The optimal type and duration of prophylactic antithrombotic therapy in these patients remain unknown., Methods: This article reports the final (90-day) results of the Intermediate versus Standard-dose Prophylactic anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents with COVID-19: An opeN label randomized controlled trial (INSPIRATION) study. Patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care were randomized to intermediate-dose versus standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation for 30 days, irrespective of hospital discharge status. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of adjudicated venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or all-cause death. The main safety outcome was major bleeding., Results: Of 600 randomized patients, 562 entered the modified intention-to-treat analysis (median age [Q1, Q3]: 62 [50, 71] years; 237 [42.2%] women), of whom 336 (59.8%) survived to hospital discharge. The primary outcome occurred in 132 (47.8%) of patients assigned to intermediate dose and 130 (45.4%) patients assigned to standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-1.55, p  = 0.11). Findings were similar for other efficacy outcomes, and in the landmark analysis from days 31 to 90 (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.45-5.06). There were 7 (2.5%) major bleeding events in the intermediate-dose group (including 3 fatal events) and 4 (1.4%) major bleeding events in the standard-dose group (none fatal) (HR: 1.82, 95% CI: 0.53-6.24)., Conclusion: Intermediate-dose compared with standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation did not reduce a composite of death, treatment with ECMO, or venous or arterial thrombosis at 90-day follow-up., Competing Interests: Dr. Parikh reports being on the Advisory Board for Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, CSI, Philips, Janssen; research grants: Abbott, Boston Scientific, Surmodics, TriReme Medical, Shockwave Medical; and receiving consulting fees from Terumo and Abiomed. Dr. Gupta received payment from the Arnold & Porter Law Firm for work related to the Sanofi clopidogrel litigation and from the Ben C. Martin Law Firm for work related to the Cook inferior vena cava filter litigation. Dr. Gupta holds equity in a health care telecardiology startup, Heartbeat Health, Inc. and received consulting fees from Edwards LifeSciences. Dr. Madhavan has received support from an institutional grant by the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to Columbia University Irving Medical Center (T32 HL007854). Dr. Sethi reports honoraria from Janssen and Chiesi and research grant support from the American Heart Association. Dr. Piazza has received research grant support to Brigham and Women's Hospital from EKOS, a BTG International Group company, Bayer, the Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance, Portola, and Janssen. He has received consulting fees from Amgen, Pfizer, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Thrombolex. Dr. Kirtane reports institutional funding to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, CSI, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, and ReCor Medical. In addition to research grants, institutional funding includes fees paid to Columbia University and/or Cardiovascular Research Foundation for speaking engagements and/or consulting. Personal: travel expenses/meals from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, CSI, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, ReCor Medical, Chiesi, OpSens, Zoll, and Regeneron. Dr. Van Tassell received research support from Novartis, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Olatec Therapeutics, and Serpin Pharma. He is a consultant of R-Pharm, Serpin Pharma. Dr. Stone has received speaker or other honoraria from Cook, Terumo, and Orchestra Biomed; served as a consultant to Valfix, TherOx, Vascular Dynamics, Robocath, HeartFlow, Gore, Ablative Solutions, Miracor, Neovasc, V-Wave, Abiomed, Ancora, MAIA Pharmaceuticals, Vectorious, Reva, Matrizyme, Cardiomech; and has received equity or options from Ancora, Cagent, Applied Therapeutics, Biostar family of funds, SpectraWave, Orchestra Biomed, Aria, Cardiac Success, MedFocus family of funds, and Valfix. Dr. Lip reports consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo. No fees are received personally. Dr. Krumholz reports personal fees from UnitedHealth, personal fees from IBM Watson Health, personal fees from Element Science, personal fees from Aetna, personal fees from Facebook, personal fees from Siegfried & Jensen Law Firm, personal fees from Arnold & Porter Law Firm, personal fees from Ben C. Martin Law Firm, personal fees from National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, ownership of HugoHealth, ownership of Refactor Health, contracts from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, grants from Medtronic and the Food and Drug Administration, grants from Medtronic and Johnson and Johnson, grants from Shenzhen Center for Health Information, and is a Venture Partner at FPrime, outside the submitted work. Dr. Bikdeli reports that he is a consulting expert, on behalf of the plaintiff, for litigation related to two specific brand models of IVC filters. All other authors report no relevant Enoxaparin was provided through Alborz Darou, Pooyesh Darou, and Caspian Pharmaceuticals companies, and atorvastatin and matching placebo were provided by Sobhan Darou. None of these companies were study sponsors and they had no other role and will not have a role in the design, conduct, analysis, or interpretation of the ongoing results or the decision to submit the resultant manuscript(s)., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Thrombotic events are commonly reported in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Limited data exist to guide the intensity of antithrombotic prophylaxis., Objective: To evaluate the effects of intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation among patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)., Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design performed in 10 academic centers in Iran comparing intermediate-dose vs standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation (first hypothesis) and statin therapy vs matching placebo (second hypothesis; not reported in this article) among adult patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19. Patients were recruited between July 29, 2020, and November 19, 2020. The final follow-up date for the 30-day primary outcome was December 19, 2020., Interventions: Intermediate-dose (enoxaparin, 1 mg/kg daily) (n = 276) vs standard prophylactic anticoagulation (enoxaparin, 40 mg daily) (n = 286), with modification according to body weight and creatinine clearance. The assigned treatments were planned to be continued until completion of 30-day follow-up., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or mortality within 30 days, assessed in randomized patients who met the eligibility criteria and received at least 1 dose of the assigned treatment. Prespecified safety outcomes included major bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (type 3 or 5 definition), powered for noninferiority (a noninferiority margin of 1.8 based on odds ratio), and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <20 ×103/µL). All outcomes were blindly adjudicated., Results: Among 600 randomized patients, 562 (93.7%) were included in the primary analysis (median [interquartile range] age, 62 [50-71] years; 237 [42.2%] women). The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 126 patients (45.7%) in the intermediate-dose group and 126 patients (44.1%) in the standard-dose prophylaxis group (absolute risk difference, 1.5% [95% CI, -6.6% to 9.8%]; odds ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.76-1.48]; P = .70). Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (2.5%) in the intermediate-dose group and 4 patients (1.4%) in the standard-dose prophylaxis group (risk difference, 1.1% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 3.4%]; odds ratio, 1.83 [1-sided 97.5% CI, 0.00-5.93]), not meeting the noninferiority criteria (P for noninferiority >.99). Severe thrombocytopenia occurred only in patients assigned to the intermediate-dose group (6 vs 0 patients; risk difference, 2.2% [95% CI, 0.4%-3.8%]; P = .01)., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19, intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, compared with standard-dose prophylactic anticoagulation, did not result in a significant difference in the primary outcome of a composite of adjudicated venous or arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or mortality within 30 days. These results do not support the routine empirical use of intermediate-dose prophylactic anticoagulation in unselected patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04486508.

Endothelial injury and microvascular/macrovascular thrombosis are common pathophysiological features of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). However, the optimal thromboprophylactic regimens remain unknown across the spectrum of illness severity of COVID-19. A variety of antithrombotic agents, doses, and durations of therapy are being assessed in ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that focus on outpatients, hospitalized patients in medical wards, and patients critically ill with COVID-19. This paper provides a perspective of the ongoing or completed RCTs related to antithrombotic strategies used in COVID-19, the opportunities and challenges for the clinical trial enterprise, and areas of existing knowledge, as well as data gaps that may motivate the design of future RCTs., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr. Van Tassell has received research support from Novartis, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Olatec Therapeutics, and Serpin Pharma; and is a consultant of R-Pharm and Serpin Pharma. Dr. Monreal has served as an advisor or consultant for Sanofi, Leo Pharma, and Daiichi-Sankyo; and has received a nonrestricted educational grant by Sanofi and Bayer to sponsor the Computerized Registry of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism. Dr. Jimenez has served as an advisor or consultant for Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, ROVI, and Sanofi; has served as a speaker or a member of a speaker bureau for Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Leo Pharma, ROVI, and Sanofi; and has received grants for clinical research from Daiichi-Sankyo, Sanofi, and ROVI. Dr. Piazza has received research grant support from Boston Scientific Corporation, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Portola/Alexion Pharmaceuticals, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and has received consulting fees from Amgen, Pfizer, Agile, and Prairie Education and Research Cooperative. Dr. Parikh has received institutional research support from Abbott Vascular, TriReme Medical, SurModics, and Shockwave Medical; is an advisory board member for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Medtronic, Janssen, CSI, and Philips; and receives honoraria from Abiomed and Terumo. Dr. Kirtane has received institutional funding from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, CSI, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, and ReCor Medical; and has received travel expenses/meals from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, CSI, CathWorks, Siemens, Philips, ReCor Medical, Chiesi, OpSens, Zoll, and Regeneron, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Eikelboom has received honoraria and grant support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Sanofi, and Eli Lilly, as well as a personal award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation. Dr. Konstantinides has received research grants from Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Actelion-Janssen; has received educational grants from Biocompatibles Group UK, Boston Scientific, and Daiichi-Sankyo; and has received lecture fees from Bayer AG, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, and Merck Sharp and Dohme. Dr. Weitz serves as a consultant and has received honoraria from Bayer, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck, Servier, Anthos, Ionis, and PhaseBio. Dr. Stone has received speaker or other honoraria from Cook, Terumo, and Orchestra Biomed; has been a consultant to Valfix, TherOx, Vascular Dynamics, Robocath, HeartFlow, Gore, Ablative Solutions, Miracor, Neovasc, V-Wave, Abiomed, Ancora, MAIA Pharmaceuticals, Vectorious, Reva, Matrizyme, and CardioMech; and has equity/options from Ancora, Cagent, Applied Therapeutics, Biostar family of funds, SpectraWave, Orchestra Biomed, Aria, Cardiac Success, MedFocus family of funds, and Valfix. Dr. Krumholz has received personal fees from UnitedHealth, IBM Watson Health, Element Science, Aetna, Facebook, Siegfried & Jensen Law Firm, Arnold & Porter Law Firm, Ben C. Martin Law Firm, and the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases (Beijing, China); has ownership in Hugo Health and Refactor Health; and has contracts from the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; and has received grants from Medtronic, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Johnson & Johnson, and the Shenzhen Center for Health Information, outside the submitted work. Dr. Lip is a consultant for Bayer/Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Verseon, and Daiichi-Sankyo; and is a speaker for Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo (no fees are directly received personally). Dr. Goldhaber has received research support from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boston Scientific, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the Thrombosis Research Institute; and has received consulting fees from Bayer, Agile, Boston Scientific, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr. Bikdeli is a consulting expert, on behalf of the plaintiff, for litigation related to 2 specific brand models of inferior vena cava filters. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Microvascular and macrovascular thrombotic events are among the hallmarks of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Furthermore, the exuberant immune response is considered an important driver of pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. The optimal management strategy to prevent thrombosis in critically-ill patients with COVID-19 remains unknown., Methods: The Intermediate versus Standard-dose Prophylactic anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents with COVID-19: An opeN label randomized controlled trial (INSPIRATION) and INSPIRATION-statin (INSPIRATION-S) studies test two independent hypotheses within a randomized controlled trial with 2 × 2 factorial design. Hospitalized critically-ill patients with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction confirmed COVID-19 will be randomized to intermediate-dose versus standard dose prophylactic anticoagulation. The 600 patients undergoing this randomization will be screened and if meeting the eligibility criteria, will undergo an additional double-blind stratified randomization to atorvastatin 20 mg daily versus matching placebo. The primary endpoint, for both hypotheses will be tested for superiority and includes a composite of adjudicated acute arterial thrombosis, venous thromboembolism (VTE), use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or all-cause death within 30 days from enrollment. Key secondary endpoints include all-cause mortality, adjudicated VTE, and ventilator-free days. Key safety endpoints include major bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <20,000/fL) for the anticoagulation hypothesis. In a prespecified secondary analysis for non-inferiority, the study will test for the non-inferiority of intermediate intensity versus standard dose anticoagulation for major bleeding, considering a non-inferiority margin of 1.8 based on odds ratio. Key safety endpoints for the statin hypothesis include rise in liver enzymes >3 times upper normal limit and clinically-diagnosed myopathy. The primary analyses will be performed in the modified intention-to-treat population. Results will be tested in exploratory analyses across key subgroups and in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol cohorts., Conclusions: INSPIRATION and INSPIRATON-S studies will help address clinically-relevant questions for antithrombotic therapy and thromboinflammatory therapy in critically-ill patients with COVID-19., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)