Search

[Background] Antimicrobial resistance is a threat to global public health. The use of prolonged infusions in the hospital setting for certain antimicrobials is widely increasing in order to improve their efficacy and safety, including resistance development. Due to limited vascular access, it is important to clarify whether they can be infused through the same line with other drugs during Y-site administration., [Aim] The aim of this review is to update and summarize the evidence on Y-site compatibility of antibacterial agents administered as prolonged infusions in intensive care units (ICUs). Study Design A literature review of PubMed, EMBASE and Trissel's Handbook on Injectable Drugs databases was conducted on the compatibility of selected antimicrobials administered simultaneously at a Y-site connection with parenteral nutrition and other widely used drugs in ICUs. All articles published up to October 30, 2021, in English or Spanish were included, regardless of the type of publication (original articles, case reports, letters, etc.). Eligible antimicrobials were those that can be administered as prolonged infusions: ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftaroline, cloxacillin, ceftobiprole, vancomycin and fosfomycin., [Results] A total of 1302 drug-to-drug potential combinations were explored, 196 (15.05%) were found to be incompatible, and in 541 (41.55%), data were not available. The results were presented in a simple 2-dimensional consultation chart as a quick reference for health care professionals., [Conclusions] This review provides useful and reliable information on the compatibility of antimicrobials administered as Y-site infusion with other drugs commonly used in the critical setting. This review contributes to patient safety in nursing practice. Relevance to Clinical Practice To our knowledge, this is the first review on Y-site compatibility of antimicrobials used as prolonged infusions with other commonly used drugs, including anti-emetics, analgesics and anti-epileptic and parenteral nutrition. The results of the current review need to be addressed to promote the knowledge sharing between health professionals and improve the quality and safety of patients. We believe that this review may serve as a simple and effective 2-dimensional updated drug-to-drug compatibility reference chart for critical care nurses.

Due to their impact on healthcare systems, the sustainability and optimization of high-cost drugs is an issue of concern for several countries. Different strategies have been implemented such as centralized purchasing to optimize budgetary resources. However, there is still a need for a mechanism to optimize these drugs further. We conducted this prospective multicenter intervention study in five hospitals in the Andalusian Public Health System of Cádiz (Spain) between July 2019 and September 2021. We developed an online website (Farmastock) and implemented it to determine the availability of high-cost, low-use, and near-expiry medicines in each hospital. We used a simple analysis using operational variables to assess the project intervention's savings impact on managing these high-cost drugs. The implementation of Farmastock in Cádiz resulted in savings of 675,757.52 € for the Andalusian Public Health System, with 238 medicines transferred out of the 373 available. Of these medicines offered, the most considerable percentage were medicines used for pathologies with high clinical instability and accounted for nearly 80% of the medicines optimized by the tool. Farmastock allowed the Andalusian Public Health System to make substantial financial savings by not making new purchases of high-cost drugs available in other centers of this health network that were not being used. Therefore, this tool is a very efficient measure to contribute to the sustainability of the APHS and could be implemented in more hospitals soon.

Objectives Topical resorcinol 15% is a self-treatment for painful hidradenitis suppurativa nodules and abscesses with good results in reducing pain and lesion duration. The aim of this study is to establish a 15% topical resorcinol formula, to develop a physicochemical and microbiological stability study and to further determine the compounding shelf-life in different package conditions following the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) specifications. Methods Physicochemical and microbiological stability studies of the formulation were conducted for 12 months at room temperature (25°C±2°C) in different package conditions: aluminium tubes (aluminium A7-99.7% varnish DF-6172), plastic tubes (low density polyethylene) and amber plastic containers (polyethylene terephthalate). High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was developed as a method of indicating the stability of the resorcinol formulation. A microbiological growth assay was also validated according to the Ph. Eur. Physical properties were inspected to determine parameters such as odour, colour, pH, emulsion phase and extensibility index and its evolution. Results The HPLC method was validated according to the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines. At day 365, visual inspection remained unchanged only for preparations packaged in aluminium tubes. The pH did not vary by more than 0.3 units in all conditions. The extensibility index decreased in the preparations packaged in plastic and amber plastic containers. HPLC analysis conducted over 1 year did not show a degradation greater than 7% of resorcinol in the preparation in plastic and aluminium packages. The ability of ATCC strains to grow in resorcinol formulation was confirmed under the suitability test. Resorcinol packed in aluminium tubes achieved microbiological stability at day 365. Conclusions Only the formulation package in aluminium tubes showed physicochemical and microbiological stability of resorcinol for 12 months at room temperature (25°C±2°C).

Antibiotics remain one of the main treatment alternatives in mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa. The use of topical 15% resorcinol reduces antibiotic pressure and the generation of resistance. However, knowledge on its efficacy and safety is limited. This single-center, prospective, follow-up cohort study evaluated topical 15% resorcinol every 12-h response at 16 weeks. Those individuals with mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa (Hurley I-II) who started treatment with topical resorcinol monotherapy between April 2019 and May 2020 were eligible for follow-up. The primary endpoint for effectiveness was the proportion of patients who achieved an overall clinical response (complete or partial response) at week 16, evaluated as intention-to-treat. Responses were measured according to the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response index. Target lesion size was measured clinically and by ultrasonography. Quality of life was assessed through the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. Safety was measured by recording the adverse events reported during the follow-up period. A total of 32 patients were enrolled (mean age, 40.1 years [95% confidence interval, 35.7-44.4]; women, 20 [62.5%]; Hurley I, 17 [53.1%]). Under the intention-to-treat analysis, 68.8% (n = 22) of the patients achieved a clinical response. A ≥50% reduction in the size of the main lesion was observed in 56.3% of the patients (n = 18). Some 65.6% (n = 21) of the patients had a ≥50% reduction (improvement) in their baseline DLQI score. Fifty percent of patients who completed the follow-up period experienced adverse events, all of which were local, mild, and transient and did not lead to discontinuation of resorcinol. To conclude, in this cohort study, topical 15% resorcinol was shown to be effective for mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa and to have a positive impact on quality of life with an acceptable safety profile.

Background and importance Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin disease that causes painful boils and abscess formation, especially localised in intertriginous areas. Resorcinol is a phenol derivate, and in topical self-treatment decreases the size and pain of HS lesions. Topical 15% resorcinol is prepared as a pharmaceutical compound and there are no data in the current literature on the microbiological stability of formulations of topical resorcinol 15%. The European Pharmacopoeia (EP) established acceptance criteria (chapter 5.1.4) for microbiological quality control of the compound. Previous to the microbiological quality assay, the EP also established the necessity of a suitability test of the method. Aim and objectives The objective of the study was to develop a microbiological growth assay to perform a microbiological stability test for quality control of this resorcinol formulation. Material and methods The composition of the formulation of topical resorcinol 15% tested was: resorcinol 15 g, purified water 15 g, sodium metabisulfite 0.1 g and lanette base cream qs 100 g. To determine the ability of microorganisms to grow in the formulation, several reference strains, according to the EP (chapters 2.6.12 and 2.6.13) were selected: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCCVR 9027TM), Candida albicans (ATCCVR 10231TM), Aspergillus brasiliensis (ATCCVR 16404TM) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCCVR 6538TM). To perform the growth assay, trypticase soy agar (TSA) were used for P aeruginosa and S aureus, and sabouraud glucose agar (SAB) for C albicans and A brasiliensis. The test was performed by taking a 1:1000 dilution of 1 g of topical resorcinol in a 0.1% Tween 80 and phosphate buffered saline solution and adding 100 µL of a suspension equivalent to 1×103 cfu/mL of every ATCC strain, which were inoculated in TSA or SAB. All tests were done in duplicate and medium lectures were made in 48 hours. Results The ability of ATCC strains to growth in resorcinol formulation was confirmed under the study conditions. There was mean growth of 17×104 cfu/mL for S aureus and 11×104 cfu/mL for P aeruginosa in TSA. For A brasiliensis and C albicans, 1×104 cfu/mL and 2×104 cfu/mL were detected, respectively. Conclusion and relevance The presented method shows a simplified way to test the microbiological viability of 15% topical resorcinol for quality control. References and/or acknowledgements No conflict of interest.

Objectives:The aim of this study was to develop and to assess a specific Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) framework to evaluate new drugs in an hospital pharmacy and therapeutics committee (P&TC) setting.Methods:A pilot criteria framework was developed based on the EVIDEM (Evidence and Value: Impact on DEcisionMaking) framework, together with other relevant criteria, and assessed by a group of P&TC's members. The weighting of included criteria was done using a 5-point weighting technique. Two drugs were chosen by evaluation: an orphan-drug for Gaucher disease, and a nonorphan drug for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Evidence matrices were developed, and value contribution of each drug was evaluated by P&TC's members. An agreed final framework was obtained through a discussion between the P&TC's members.Results:After criteria assessment, the pilot framework included eight quantitative criteria: “disease severity,” “unmet needs,” “comparative efficacy/effectiveness,” “comparative safety/tolerability,” “comparative patient-reported outcomes,” “comparative cost consequences-cost of treatment,” “comparative cost consequences-other medical costs,” and “quality of evidence”; and one contextual criterion: “opportunity costs and affordability.” The most valued criteria were: “comparative safety/tolerability,” “disease severity,” and “comparative efficacy/effectiveness.” When assessing the drugs most valued characteristics of the MCDA were the possibility that all team may contribute to drug assessment by means of scoring the matrices and the discussion to reach a consensus in drug positioning and value decision making.Conclusions:The reflective MCDA would integrate quantitative and qualitative criteria relevant for a P&TC setting, allowing reflective discussions based on the criteria weighting score.