Search

Objective Reactive balance training (RBT) is an emerging approach to reducing falls risk in people with balance impairments. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of RBT on falls in daily life among individuals at increased risk of falls and to document associated adverse events. Methods Databases searched were Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to March 2022), Embase Classic and Embase (1947 to March 2022), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2014 to March 2022), and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro; searched on 22 March 2022). Randomized controlled trials of RBT were included. The literature search was limited to the English language. Records were screened by 2 investigators separately. Outcome measures were number of participants who reported falls after training, number of falls reported after training, and the nature, frequency, and severity of adverse events. Authors of included studies were contacted to obtain additional information. Results Twenty-nine trials were included, of which 17 reported falls and 21 monitored adverse events. Participants assigned to RBT groups were less likely to fall compared with control groups (fall risk ratio = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.63–0.92; I 2 = 32%) and reported fewer falls than control groups (rate ratio = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.45–0.83; I 2 = 81%). Prevalence of adverse events was higher in RBT (29%) compared with control groups (20%). Conclusion RBT reduced the likelihood of falls in daily life for older adults and people with balance impairments. More adverse events were reported in RBT than control groups. Impact Balance training that evokes balance reactions can reduce falls among people at increased risk of falls. Older adults and individuals with balance problems were less likely to fall in daily life after participating in RBT compared with traditional balance training. Lay summary If you are an older adult and/or have balance problems, your physical therapist may prescribe reactive balance training rather than traditional balance training in order to reduce your likelihood of falling in daily life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reactive balance training (RBT) aims to improve reactive balance control. However, because RBT involves clients losing balance, clinicians may view that it is unsafe or not feasible for some clients. We aimed to explore how clinicians implement RBT to treat balance and mobility issues. Physiotherapists and kinesiologists across Canada who reported that they include RBT in their practices were invited to complete telephone interviews about their experiences with RBT. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a deductive thematic analysis. Ten participants completed telephone interviews, which lasted between 30-60 min. Participants primarily worked in a hospital setting (inpatient rehabilitation (n = 3); outpatient rehabilitation (n = 2)), and were treated clients with neurological conditions (n = 5). Four main themes were identified: 1) there is variability in RBT approaches; 2) knowledge can be a barrier and facilitator to RBT; 3) reactive balance control is viewed as an advanced skill; and 4) RBT experience builds confidence. Our findings suggest a need for resources to make clinical implementation of RBT more feasible. Trust between the therapist and client improves self-efficacy and feelings of apprehension/fear when conducting reactive balance training. Being creative and improvising with equipment that is readily available in clinics enables reactive balance training, without the need for high-tech equipment. Clinicians should consider using standardized tools with reactive balance control components, such as the Balance Evaluation Systems Test or Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, to assess balance control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Regular exercise is essential in the chronic phase of stroke recovery for improving or maintaining function, and reducing the risk of a second stroke. To achieve these goals, multiple components of fitness should be targeted with poststroke exercise, including aerobic capacity, strength and balance. However, following the recommended frequency and duration of each component separately can take a long time and lead to fatigue in people with stroke. Therefore, finding types of exercise that target multiple components of fitness all together is valuable. Reactive balance training (RBT) is a novel type of exercise where individuals repeatedly lose their balance in order to practise balance reactions. When people do RBT, they increase their heart rate and exert forces with their leg muscles which could improve aerobic fitness and muscle strength, respectively. This means that RBT could have the potential to improve multiple components of fitness, simultaneously. Methods and analysis This is a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial with internal pilot study. Participants with chronic stroke will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: (1) RBT or (2) aerobic and strength training (AST). Participants in both groups will complete 1 hour of exercise, three times/week for 12 weeks. The primary objective is to determine the effect of RBT on aerobic capacity and knee muscles’ strength. The secondary objective is to determine the effects of RBT and AST on balance control and balance confidence. We expect to find that RBT is superior to AST in terms of improving balance control and balance confidence, yet not inferior to AST in terms of its effects on aerobic capacity and strength. Ethics and dissemination Research ethics approval has been received. Results will be disseminated directly to study participants at the end of the trial, and to other stakeholders via publication in a peer-reviewed journal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Regular physical activity is associated with better asthma control; however, little is known of the determinants of physical activity in a population of adults with asthma. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify important sociodemographic, health and lifestyle correlates of physical activity among adults with asthma.Methods: Data from adults with asthma aged 18–44 years (n= 2740) from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), 2011–2012 annual component were used for analysis. The main outcome was Daily Energy Expenditure (DEE). This variable was based on frequency and duration of leisure activities in the past 3 months. Self-reported sociodemographic (age, sex, total household income, highest education level, and ethnicity), health-related (body mass index (BMI), self-perceived health, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and asthma symptoms/attacks, past year) and lifestyle (type of smoker, sedentary time, fruit and vegetable consumption) variables were assessed as correlates for DEE. Data were analysed using linear regressions.Results: In the final model, sociodemographic correlates accounted for 4.2% of the variation in DEE. Adding health correlates increased the R2to 12.1%. Finally, adding lifestyle correlates increased the R2to 17.6%.Conclusions: In adults with current asthma, the main correlates of physical activity are age, total household income, BMI, self-perceived health, anxiety disorder, sedentary time, and fruit and vegetable consumption. These data are important for informing education and exercise interventions for adults with asthma. Future research is needed to determine asthma-specific correlates of physical activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractPurposeMethodsResultsConclusionsTrial registrationThis study aimed to determine if the Promoting Optimal Physical Exercise for Life (PROPEL) program increases participation in physical activity up to six months post-discharge from stroke rehabilitation, compared to participation in group cardiorespiratory exercise (GCE) alone.This was a stepped-wedge cluster superiority randomised controlled trial. People with sub-acute stroke participated in the PROPEL (n = 107) or GCE (n = 65) intervention phases. The primary outcome was adherence to physical activity guidelines over seven days at six months post-discharge from rehabilitation. Secondary outcomes were exercise self-efficacy (Short Self-Efficacy for Exercise scale), exercise-related beliefs and attitudes (Short Outcome Expectation for Exercise scale), and perceived barriers to physical activity (Barriers to Being Active Quiz).Fifty-seven participants (PROPEL, n = 29; GCE, n = 28) were included in the analysis. At six months post-discharge, 6/17 PROPEL participants and 9/22 GCE participants met the guidelines for intensity and duration of physical activity; the odds of meeting physical activity guidelines did not differ between phases (p > 0.84). PROPEL participants reported higher self-efficacy for exercise than GCE participants (p = 0.0047).While PROPEL participants reported higher self-efficacy for exercise than those who completed GCE alone, we were unable to find evidence that this translated to increased odds of meeting physical activity guidelines.NCT02951338IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONIntegration of cardiorespiratory exercise with behaviour modification strategies to improve physical activity participation after discharge from stroke rehabilitation increases self-efficacy for exercise when compared to cardiorespiratory exercise alone.Increased self-efficacy for exercise may not increase the odds of meeting physical activity guidelines post-stroke.Improving self-efficacy for exercise during stroke rehabilitation may encourage participation in moderate to vigorous physical activity up to 6-months post-discharge from rehabilitation.Integration of cardiorespiratory exercise with behaviour modification strategies to improve physical activity participation after discharge from stroke rehabilitation increases self-efficacy for exercise when compared to cardiorespiratory exercise alone.Increased self-efficacy for exercise may not increase the odds of meeting physical activity guidelines post-stroke.Improving self-efficacy for exercise during stroke rehabilitation may encourage participation in moderate to vigorous physical activity up to 6-months post-discharge from rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]