Search

Introduction: Although estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are continuously developed for pediatric population, impact of height measurement is often neglected due to variable dynamic growth changes in children. This study aimed to compare differential impacts of eGFR values calculated by six equations that do not use height information. Materials and methods: 3503 Korean pediatric patients with creatinine/cystatin C assay-based laboratory results from 2008 to 2021 were analyzed for clinical course using a total of 8113 laboratory test results. Baseline eGFR was calculated by eight different equations including two widely used equations incorporating height parameter. Along with the agreement of CKD (chronic kidney disease) stage categorization by different equations, clinical outcome of incident CKD diagnosis in 13 years of study period were compared. Results: Among a total of 28 pairwise comparisons among eight equations, only 4 combinations of comparisons revealed optimal P15 values (≥80 % concordance), with FAS-age equation being both concordant with two equations using height parameter. Clustering of eight equations by incident CKD diagnosis in subsequent tests also highlighted FAS-age as candidate equation within the same cluster with Schwartz-bedside and FAS-height equations. When the equation values were classified into Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD stages, the distribution patterns for stage 1 and 5 were significantly different among eGFR equations. FAS-age equation revealed the highest agreement with Schwartz-bedside and FAS-height equations that incorporate the height data. Conclusions: The eGFR equation type should be considered to establish the eGFR intervals for CKD stage classification, particularly in the pediatric patient population. Cautious interpretation is required for eGFR value along with clinical context.

Objective LIA-ANA-Profile-17S is a multiplex line immunoassay that simultaneously detects 17 antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) against extractable nuclear antigens (ENAs). We evaluated the utility of LIA-ANA-Profile-17S as a supplement to ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and EliA ENA (a fluorescence enzyme immunoassay) for diagnosis of ANA-associated rheumatic diseases. Methods Sera were collected from 245 patients referred for an ANA IIF test. LIA-ANA-Profile-17S results were compared with those of EliA ENA. The kappa coefficients, agreement rates, and diagnostic performance of these tests were assessed for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjögren’s syndrome (SjS). Results We observed almost perfect interassay agreement for antibodies against Ro52/Ro60, CENP-B, and Scl-70 (kappa = 0.91, 0.97, and 1.00, respectively); strong agreement for anti-SS-B/La antibody (kappa = 0.81); and relatively low agreement for other antibodies, including those against dsDNA, Sm, RNP, and Jo-1. For SLE diagnosis, LIA-ANA-Profile-17S showed lower sensitivity and similar specificity compared with EliA ENA. The sensitivity and specificity of these two assays were similar for SjS diagnosis. Conclusions The specificity of LIA-ANA-Profile-17S was enhanced when combined with ANA IIF and was comparable with that of EliA ENA. LIA-ANA-Profile-17S showed relatively good agreement with EliA ENA. In combination with ANA IIF, these assays showed enhanced diagnostic performance.

This article provides information on the diagnosis of a rare hemoglobinopathy called Hemoglobin Boras in a Korean patient. Hemoglobinopathies are genetic disorders that affect hemoglobin, resulting in various symptoms. The patient in this case presented with anemia, jaundice, and an enlarged spleen. Laboratory tests, including hemoglobin electrophoresis and genetic testing, confirmed the diagnosis. The article highlights the importance of considering Hemoglobin Boras as a potential cause when observing unique hemoglobin electrophoresis patterns. Additionally, the document references several scientific articles related to the analysis and evaluation of different types of hemoglobin disorders, providing valuable information for researchers and healthcare professionals studying and treating these conditions. [Extracted from the article]

Background: BRCA testing is necessary for establishing a management strategy for ovarian cancer. Several BRCA testing strategies, including germline and somatic testing, are implemented in clinical practice in Korea. We aimed to comparatively evaluate their costeffectiveness from patients' perspective. Methods: We developed a decision model comprising five BRCA testing strategies implemented in Korea: (1) germline testing first, followed by somatic tumor testing for patients without a germline variant; (2) somatic testing first, followed by germline testing for patients with a variant detected by somatic testing; (3) both germline and somatic testing; (4) germline testing alone; and (5) somatic testing alone, with no testing as the comparator. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the uncertainty of key parameters. Results: Assuming a willingness-to-pay of $20,000 per progression-free life-year gain (PFLYG), all five strategies were considered cost-effective. Strategy 4 was the most cost-effective option, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $2,547.7 per PF-LYG, followed by strategy 1, with an ICER of $3,978.4 per PF-LYG. Even when the parameter values were varied within the possible range, the ICERs of all strategies did not exceed the willingness-to-pay threshold. Conclusions: Considering the importance of knowing a patient's BRCA gene status, germline testing first, followed by somatic testing, may be a reasonable option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]