Search

An evolutionarily conserved region of the TDP-43 low-complexity domain (LCD) twenty residues in length can adopt either an α-helical or β-strand conformation. When in the latter conformation, TDP-43 self-associates via the formation of a labile, cross-β structure. Self-association can be monitored via the formation of phase-separated protein droplets. Exposure of droplets to hydrogen peroxide leads to oxidation of conserved methionine residues distributed throughout the LCD. Oxidation disassembles the cross-β structure, thus eliminating both self-association and phase separation. Here, we demonstrate that this process reciprocally enables formation of α-helical structure in precisely the same region formerly functioning to facilitate β-strand-mediated self-association. We further observe that the α-helical conformation allows interaction with a lipid-like detergent and that exposure to lipids enhances the β-to-α conformational switch. We hypothesize that regulation of this oxidative switch will prove to be important to the control of localized translation within vertebrate cells. The experimental observations reported herein were heavily reliant on studies of 1,6-hexanediol, a chemical agent that selectively dissolves labile structures formed via the self-association of protein domains of low sequence complexity. This aliphatic alcohol is shown to exert its dissociative activity primarily via hydrogen-bonding interactions with carbonyl oxygen atoms of the polypeptide backbone. Such observations underscore the central importance of backbone-mediated protein:protein interactions that facilitate the self-association and phase separation of LCDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Characterizing interactions of Synaptotagmin‐1 with the SNARE complex is crucial to understand the mechanism of neurotransmitter release. X‐ray crystallography revealed how the Synaptotagmin‐1 C2B domain binds to the SNARE complex through a so‐called primary interface and to a complexin‐1‐SNARE complex through a so‐called tripartite interface. Mutagenesis and electrophysiology supported the functional relevance of both interfaces, and extensive additional data validated the primary interface. However, ITC evidence suggesting that binding via the tripartite interface occurs in solution was called into question by subsequent NMR data. Here, we describe joint efforts to address this apparent contradiction. Using the same ITC approach with the same C2B domain mutant used previously (C2BKA‐Q) but including ion exchange chromatography to purify it, which is crucial to remove polyacidic contaminants, we were unable to observe the substantial endothermic ITC signal that was previously attributed to binding of this mutant to the complexin‐1‐SNARE complex through the tripartite interface. We were also unable to detect substantial populations of the tripartite interface in NMR analyses of the ITC samples or in measurements of paramagnetic relaxation effects, despite the high sensitivity of this method to detect weak protein complexes. However, these experiments do not rule out the possibility of very low affinity (KD > 1 mm) binding through this interface. These results emphasize the need to develop methods to characterize the structure of synaptotagmin‐1‐SNARE complexes between two membranes and to perform further structure–function analyses to establish the physiological relevance of the tripartite interface. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Ca2+ sensor synaptotagmin-1 and the SNARE complex cooperate to trigger neurotransmitter release. Structural studies elucidated three distinct synaptotagmin-1-SNARE complex binding modes involving 'polybasic', 'primary' and 'tripartite' interfaces of synaptotagmin-1. We investigated these interactions using NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy. Synaptotagmin-1 binds to the SNARE complex through the polybasic and primary interfaces in solution. Ca2+-free synaptotagmin-1 binds to SNARE complexes anchored on PIP2-containing nanodiscs. R398Q/R399Q and E295A/Y338W mutations at the primary interface, which strongly impair neurotransmitter release, disrupt and enhance synaptotagmin-1-SNARE complex binding, respectively. Ca2+ induces tight binding of synaptotagmin-1 to PIP2-containing nanodiscs, disrupting synaptotagmin-1-SNARE interactions. Specific effects of mutations in the polybasic region on Ca2+-dependent synaptotagmin-1-PIP2-membrane interactions correlate with their effects on release. Our data suggest that synaptotagmin-1 binds to the SNARE complex through the primary interface and that Ca2+ releases this interaction, inducing PIP2/membrane binding and allowing cooperation between synaptotagmin-1 and the SNAREs in membrane fusion to trigger release. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neurotransmitter release is triggered in microseconds by Ca 2+ -binding to the Synaptotagmin-1 C 2 domains and by SNARE complexes that form four-helix bundles between synaptic vesicles and plasma membranes, but the coupling mechanism between Ca 2+ -sensing and membrane fusion is unknown. Release requires extension of SNARE helices into juxtamembrane linkers that precede transmembrane regions (linker zippering) and binding of the Synaptotagmin-1 C 2 B domain to SNARE complexes through a 'primary interface' comprising two regions (I and II). The Synaptotagmin-1 Ca 2+ -binding loops were believed to accelerate membrane fusion by inducing membrane curvature, perturbing lipid bilayers or helping bridge the membranes, but SNARE complex binding orients the Ca 2+ -binding loops away from the fusion site, hindering these putative activities. Molecular dynamics simulations now suggest that Synaptotagmin-1 C 2 domains near the site of fusion hinder SNARE action, providing an explanation for this paradox and arguing against previous models of Sytnaptotagmin-1 action. NMR experiments reveal that binding of C 2 B domain arginines to SNARE acidic residues at region II remains after disruption of region I. These results and fluorescence resonance energy transfer assays, together with previous data, suggest that Ca 2+ causes reorientation of the C 2 B domain on the membrane and dissociation from the SNAREs at region I but not region II. Based on these results and molecular modeling, we propose that Synaptotagmin-1 acts as a lever that pulls the SNARE complex when Ca 2+ causes reorientation of the C 2 B domain, facilitating linker zippering and fast membrane fusion. This hypothesis is supported by the electrophysiological data described in the accompanying paper., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.

The Ca 2+ sensor synaptotagmin-1 and the SNARE complex cooperate to trigger neurotransmitter release. Structural studies elucidated three distinct synaptotagmin-1-SNARE complex binding modes involving 'polybasic', 'primary' and 'tripartite' interfaces of synaptotagmin-1. We investigated these interactions using NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy. Synaptotagmin-1 binds to the SNARE complex through the polybasic and primary interfaces in solution. Ca 2+ -free synaptotagmin-1 binds to SNARE complexes anchored on PIP 2 -containing nanodiscs. R398Q/R399Q and E295A/Y338W mutations at the primary interface, which strongly impair neurotransmitter release, disrupt and enhance synaptotagmin-1-SNARE complex binding, respectively. Ca 2+ induces tight binding of synaptotagmin-1 to PIP 2 -containing nanodiscs, disrupting synaptotagmin-1-SNARE interactions. Specific effects of mutations in the polybasic region on Ca 2+ -dependent synaptotagmin-1-PIP 2 -membrane interactions correlate with their effects on release. Our data suggest that synaptotagmin-1 binds to the SNARE complex through the primary interface and that Ca 2+ releases this interaction, inducing PIP 2 /membrane binding and allowing cooperation between synaptotagmin-1 and the SNAREs in membrane fusion to trigger release., Competing Interests: RV, KJ, JR No competing interests declared, (© 2020, Voleti et al.)