Search

Background and Purpose— A previous randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study suggested that abciximab may be safe and effective in treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The current phase 3 study was planned to test the relative efficacy and safety of abciximab in patients with acute ischemic stroke with planned treatment within 5 hours since symptoms onset. Methods— An international, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial tested intravenous administration of abciximab in 2 study cohorts using stratification variables of time since onset and stroke severity. The planned enrollment was 1800 patients. The primary cohort enrolled those patients who could be treated within 5 hours of onset of stroke. A companion cohort enrolled patients that were treated 5 to 6 hours after stroke as well as a smaller cohort of patients who could be treated within 3 hours of stroke present on awakening. The primary efficacy measure was the dichotomous modified Rankin Scale score at 3 months as adjusted to the baseline severity of stroke among subjects in the primary cohort. The primary safety outcome was the rate of symptomatic or fatal intracranial hemorrhage that occurred within 5 days of stroke. Results— The trial was terminated prematurely after 808 patients in all cohorts were enrolled by recommendation of an independent safety and efficacy monitoring board due to an unfavorable benefit-risk profile. At 3 months, approximately 33% of patients assigned placebo (72/218) and 32% of patients assigned abciximab (71/221; P =0.944) in the primary cohort were judged to have a favorable response to treatment. The distributions of outcomes on the modified Rankin Scale were similar between the treated and control groups. Within 5 days of enrollment, ≈5.5% of abciximab-treated and 0.5% of placebo-treated patients in the primary cohort had symptomatic or fatal intracranial hemorrhage ( P =0.002). The trial also did not demonstrate an improvement in outcomes with abciximab among patients in the companion and wake-up cohorts. Although the number of patients was small, an increased rate of hemorrhage was noted within 5 days among patients in the wake-up population who received abciximab (13.6% versus 5% for placebo). Conclusions— This trial did not demonstrate either safety or efficacy of intravenous administration of abciximab for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke regardless of end point or population studied. There was an increased rate of symptomatic or fatal intracranial hemorrhage in the primary and wake-up cohorts.

Background: The spectrum of neurological impairments following acute ischemic stroke is broad. The initial stroke severity predicts responses to treatment and outcomes after ischemic stroke. While clinical trials are using baseline severity as an enrollment criterion or a stratified variable, adjustment of outcome measures as a function of initial impairments has not been done. Methods: We developed a responder analysis that defines favorable outcomes at 90 days as influenced by the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 if the baseline NIHSS score was 14. The concept stemmed from the data of two European rtPA trials. The analysis is a predefined secondary endpoint in a trial testing abciximab. We also used the analysis to reexamine the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment data. Results: The responder analysis did not change the overall results of any of the 3 previous trials, but it did give information about differences in responses among subgroups of patients. Evidence about the potential utility of tPA for treatment of patients with mild stroke appeared from the analysis of the second European trial of rtPA. The analysis also provided a hint of efficacy of abciximab. Conclusions: The responder analysis appears to be a potentially useful way to evaluate outcomes of patients enrolled in clinical trials in stroke. The results of the analysis have clinical relevance and can further explain differences in responses to therapies. In addition, the analysis allows for improved comparisons of results among clinical trials.

Although thrombolytic therapy is approved in several countries for treatment of ischemic stroke, only a small number of patients are eligible for treatment. Additional agents that could restore or improve cerebral flow are needed. Reperfusion agents such as platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists, alone or in combination with reduced doses of thrombolytic agents, have the potential for improving safety and efficacy compared with standard recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). In addition, GP IIb/IIIa antagonists may permit expansion beyond the current 3-hour window after symptom onset that is used for rt-PA. On the basis of experience in acute coronary syndromes, parenteral GP IIb/IIIa antagonists may have potential applications in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke and as adjunctive therapy to carotid angioplasty.

While thrombolytic therapy is approved in the United States and Canada for treatment of acute ischemic stroke, only a small number of patients are currently treated. Additional agents that could restore or improve cerebral flow are needed. Based on the experience in acute coronary syndromes, reperfusion agents such as platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists, alone or in combination with reduced doses of thrombolytic agents, have the potential for improving the safety and efficacy of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA). In addition, these newer agents may permit extension beyond the current 3-hour window from symptom onset used for systemic rt-PA.

Background —Increased levels of markers of hemostasis may assist in the determination of the extent of carotid occlusive disease and the identification of neurologically intact individuals at increased risk of ischemic events. Methods —We conducted a prospective study of 304 subjects, including 82 with a recent (≤7 days) transient ischemic attack (TIA), 157 asymptomatic individuals with a cervical bruit, and 65 control subjects. Baseline evaluation included a neurological assessment, ECG, cervical ultrasonography, and cerebral CT and/or MRI. Levels of markers of coagulation and fibrinolytic activity were also determined. Results were analyzed in relation to the degree of carotid disease and the subsequent occurrence of cerebral and cardiac ischemic events. Results —Over a mean follow-up period of 2.8 years (SD, 1.3 years), 114 ischemic events occurred. Survival analyses showed that prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F 1.2 ) was a predictor of time to cerebral and cardiac ischemic events in the combined TIA and asymptomatic bruit group (relative risk [RR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.81) as well as in the asymptomatic bruit group separately (RR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.53). In the TIA group, both F 1.2 (RR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.19 to 4.68) and severe (≥80%) carotid stenosis (RR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.19 to 10.51) were predictive of time to ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. Conclusions —In patients with TIAs and in asymptomatic individuals with cervical bruits, F 1.2 levels were found to be independent predictors of subsequent cerebral and cardiac ischemic events. Our results are consistent with an active role of the coagulation system through upregulation of thrombin in carotid disease progression and in the pathogenesis of ischemic events in patients at risk.

SummarySymptoms and clinical signs individually are inaccurate for the diagnosis of DVT. However, when assessing patients with leg symptoms, clinicians have access to additional information, such as whether or not DVT risk factors are present that could improve the accuracy of clinical judgment. The purpose of this study was to identify which clinical variables best predict DVT, and to use these variables to create a clinical prediction index for DVT. We studied 271 university hospital patients with a first episode of symptomatic, clinically suspected DVT. The prevalence of DVT was 27%, of which 71% were proximal. At baseline, information was collected on demographic features, comorbidity, and symptoms and signs. A Bayesian model selection strategy was used to estimate the logistic regression model that best predicted DVT. Male sex [OR = 2.8 (1.5, 5.1)], orthopedic surgery [OR = 5.4 (2.2, 13.6)], warmth [OR = 2.1 (1.2, 3.9)] and superficial venous dilation on exam [OR = 2.9 (1.4, 5.7)] were independent predictors of DVT. Using the model, a clinical prediction index that categorized patients into different levels of DVT risk was created, and was useful in a theoretical strategy aimed to limit the need for contrast venography in patients with suspected DVT, such that 96% of study patients could have avoided contrast venography. This index should be evaluated prospectively in other patient populations.

SummaryThe optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is uncertain. Based on the hypothesis that a normal impedance plethysmogram (IPG) following DVT defines a group of patients at low risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), a trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of only four weeks of warfarin. Patients with venographically confirmed acute proximal DVT who had received four weeks of warfarin after initial heparin and whose four week IPG was normal were allocated to either continue warfarin (targeted International Normalized Ratio 2.0 to 3.0) for a further eight weeks or receive placebo. Patients with an abnormal four week IPG received warfarin for a further eight weeks. Based on clinical characteristics at the time of the qualifying thrombosis, all patients were classified as having either continuing or transient risk factors for recurrent VTE. During the eight weeks following randomization, nine (8.6%) of the 105 placebo patients developed recurrent VTE compared to one (0.9%) of the 109 warfarin patients, P = 0.009. Over the entire 11 months of follow-up, 12 placebo patients developed recurrence compared to seven warfarin patients, P = 0.3. Nineteen of the 192 patients with an abnormal four week IPG experienced recurrence during the nine months after discontinuing warfarin.In the 301 patients who received three months of warfarin in the randomized trial or in the cohort study, all 26 recurrent events were in the 212 patients with continuing risk factors.In conclusion, an IPG four weeks after proximal DVT is not a useful predictor for recurrent VTE; whereas the presence of continuing risk factors is a very strong predictor. Four weeks of oral anticoagulants may be all that is required in patients without continuing risk factors. Patients with continuing risk factors may require more than three months of oral anticoagulants.

SummaryThe burden of thromboembolism (TE) in severe sepsis is largely unknown. We assessed the prevalence of venous and arterial TE in patients with severe sepsis over a four-week period. We performed a retrospective analysis of a pooled database of three randomized, placebo-controlled trials of two novel pharmacological agents for the treatment of severe sepsis, drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA)and secretory phospholipase A2 inhibitor (sPLA2I). The study was conducted at intensive care units of the participating institutions. A total of 2,649 patients with known or suspected infection and sepsis-associated acute organ dysfunction were enrolled in the three trials and were assigned to treatment groups (DrotAA=850; sPLA2I =578; placebo=1221). The database was queried for venous and arterial TE, using investigator reports of serious adverse events. Eighty-four of 2,649 patients (3.2%; 95% confidence interval, 2.5% to 3.9%) developed at least one thromboembolic event over 28 days. Nearly threequarters of episodes were atheroembolic (n=62); 25% involved the deep venous system (n=25). Ischemic stroke (n=30) and venous thromboembolism (n=25) each occurred in about 1% of patients. Ischemic stroke and acute coronary syndrome had a higher peak incidence during the first five days compared to venous TE onset, which was more constant over the 28-day period. Subgroup analysis by pooled treatment groups yielded TE rates of 2.0% (DrotAA), 3.5% (placebo), and 4.0% (sPLA2I), respectively. Clinically manifest TE occurred in about 3% of severe sepsis patients treated in the intensive care unit over a 28-day period. Arterial TE may be more common than previously recognized. More accurate estimates of TE prevalence and relationship to sepsis await future studies.

A patient was administered drotrecogin alfa (activated) in addition to the standard of care for presumed severe sepsis and circulatory shock. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and hepatic and splenic thromboses complicated her clinical course. Because drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment is associated with improvement in thrombotic manifestations and thrombocytopenia, it was continued as the sole antithrombotic agent after the HIT became apparent. This approach was chosen despite the patient's severe hepatic and renal dysfunction, which made the use of direct thrombin inhibitors unfavorable. She survived with a reasonable outcome and salvage of her limbs. Although this case suggests a potential role of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in the management of HIT, systematic evaluation of its efficacy in this situation is warranted.

Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are common and usually of little clinical significance. We report the unusual cases of two patients with pulmonary embolism from thrombosis of part of a duplicated IVC. Both caval anomalies were easily identified with ultrasound, and the patients were successfully treated with anticoagulants. We encourage the reporting of similar cases since knowledge of the contribution of IVC duplication to thromboembolic disease is unknown.

A written survey of all licensed medical laboratories in Canada performing coagulation testing was performed to investigate the level of knowledge and overall usage of the INR system for reporting prothrombin time results in medical laboratories. There was an overall response rate of 857 of 1,228 laboratories surveyed. Fifty-seven percent of responding laboratories utilized some format of INR reporting. The ISi of the individual thromboplastin utilized was known by 89% of laboratories. The IS1 of the thromboplastin utilized was known to be specific for the particular reagent/Instrument combination in 44% of cases. Fifty-five percent of client physicians preferred PT results to be reported in seconds while 42% desired an INR format. The situation in Canada is similar to the United States in that further education regarding the INR system for PT reporting is required by both medical laboratories and physicians. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Platelets play an important role in the pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and ischemic stroke. The expression of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (alphaIIb/beta3 integrin) receptor on the surface of activated platelets constitutes the common pathway for platelet aggregation. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa has low affinity for its soluble ligands (fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor) in resting platelets. In the setting of vascular injury, platelet activation occurs after binding of the glycoprotein Ib-IX-V receptor to von Willebrand factor in the extracellular matrix (at high shear rate) and binding of soluble agonists to specific platelet membrane receptors. The ensuing inside-out signaling increases several-fold the affinity and avidity of alphaIIb/beta3 for its ligands. High affinity ligand binding to alphaIIb/beta3 triggers outside-in signaling, causing microskeletal contraction and platelet retraction. The signaling pathways for inside-out and outside-in signaling are incompletely understood. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists were developed under the premise that these agents would abrogate platelet aggregation while preserving platelet monolayer deposition at sites of injury. A number of parenteral and oral agents have been developed and evaluated in clinical trials. Three of them are approved in the United States and other countries: abciximab (ReoPro; the Fab fragment of a chimeric human-mouse antibody), eptifibatide (Integrelin; a cyclic heptapeptide), and tirofiban (Aggrastat; a tyrosine-derived nonpeptide molecule). The greatest clinical impact of these parenteral agents (used in conjunction with aspirin and heparin) has been in the prevention of ischemic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. In contrast, oral agents have yielded disappointing results in the secondary prevention of acute coronary syndromes, and none of them are approved at present. Eptifibatide and tirofiban are specific for alphaIIb/beta3, whereas abciximab also exhibits cross-reactivity with the alphavbeta3 and alphaMbeta2 integrins. Although alphaIIb/beta3 is unique to platelets and megakaryocytes, alphavbeta3 is more widely distributed and mediates several functions, including endothelial cell migration, monocyte adhesion, angiogenesis, and inhibition of apoptosis. alphaMbeta2 mediates leukocyte-platelet interactions. In the percutaneous coronary intervention trials, abciximab has been more efficacious than the other parenteral agents, perhaps because of cross-reactivity with these other integrins, the pharmacodynamic profile of abciximab, or other effects. Other documented effects of abciximab include acute dethrombosis, reduction of thrombin generation, and improved flow in the coronary microcirculation after percutaneous coronary intervention. Abciximab is presently under evaluation in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Promising data have been obtained in experimental models of tumor angiogenesis and sickle cell anemia.

Objectives: In this randomized management study, we examined the safety of withholding anticoagulation on the basis of negative impedance plethysmography (IPG) compared to negative contrast venography (CV) in symptomatic patients with a first episode of clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and we determined the impact of the limitations of IPG or CV on their clinical utility. Methods: Patients at a university teaching hospital presenting with a first episode of clinically suspected DVT were randomized to one of two management strategies at study entry: (1) IPG: if positive, confirmatory CV was performed. If CV was positive, anticoagulants were administered, if CV was negative, anticoagulants were held. If negative, IPG was repeated serially and if it remained negative, anticoagulants were held (n=165). (2) CV: if positive, anticoagulants were administered, if negative, anticoagulants were held (n=159). The negative predictive value (NPV) of IPG and CV, positive predictive value (PPV) of IPG, and the failure rate of each strategy were assessed. Results: Among IPG patients, 28 of 37 with positive IPG initially or during serial testing and evaluable CV had confirmed DVT (PPV 76%; 95% confidence interval, CI [62%, 90%]). DVT was diagnosed during serial testing in 2.1% of patients with initially negative IPG who completed testing. The NPV overall of negative IPG was 98.3%. During follow-up, two patients in the IPG group (1.2%) and two patients in the CV group (1.3%) developed venous thromboembolism (VTE). Death during follow-up occurred in 11% of IPG patients compared to 6% of CV patients (P=.13) The investigation strategy failed in 25% of IPG patients and in 14% of CV patients. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that the two diagnostic strategies we studied are equivalent methods for ruling out DVT in patients with a first episode of suspected DVT. The PPV of IPG was too low to permit its use alone as a test to rule in DVT. Both strategies had surprisingly high failure rates.

Objective : To compare the effectiveness and safety of fixed-dose enoxaparin and adjusted-dose warfarin in preventing venous thromboembolism after knee arthroplasty. Design : A randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Setting : 8 university hospitals. Patients : 670 consecutive patients who had knee arthroplasty. Intervention : Patients were randomly assigned to receive enoxaparin (30 mg subcutaneously every 12 hours) or adjusted-dose warfarin (international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0). Both regimens were started after surgery. Measurements : The primary end point was the incidence of deep venous thrombosis in patients with adequate bilateral venograms ; the secondary end point was hemorrhage. Results : Among the 417 patients with adequate venograms, 109 of 211 warfarin recipients (51.7%) had deep venous thrombosis compared with 76 of 206 enoxaparin recipients (36.9%) (P = 0.003). The absolute risk difference was 14.8% in favor of enoxaparin (95% CI, 5.3% to 24.1%). Twenty-two warfarin recipients (10.4%) and 24 enoxaparin recipients (11.7%) had proximal venous thrombosis (P > 0.2). The absolute risk difference was 1.2% in favor of warfarin (Cl, -7.2% to 4.8%). The incidence of major bleeding was 1.8% (6 of 334 patients) in the warfarin group and 2.1% (7 of 336 patients) in the enoxaparin group (P > 0.2). The absolute risk difference was 0.3% in favor of warfarin (Cl, -2.4% to 1.8%). Conclusions : A postoperative, fixed-dose enoxaparin regimen is more effective than adjusted-dose warfarin in preventing total deep venous thrombosis after knee arthroplasty. No differences were seen in the incidence of proximal venous thrombosis or clinically overt hemorrhage.

Patients with acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis are usually treated first in the hospital with intravenous standard (unfractionated) heparin. However, the longer plasma half-life, better bioavailability after subcutaneous administration, and more predictable anticoagulant response of low-molecular-weight heparins make them attractive for possible home use. We compared these two approaches.Patients with acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous standard heparin in the hospital (253 patients) or low-molecular-weight heparin (1 mg of enoxaparin per kilogram of body weight subcutaneously twice daily) administered primarily at home (247 patients). The study design allowed outpatients taking low-molecular-weight heparin to go home immediately and hospitalized patients taking low-molecular-weight heparin to be discharged early. All the patients received warfarin starting on the second day.Thirteen of the 247 patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin (5.3 percent) had recurrent thromboembolism, as compared with 17 of the 253 patients receiving standard heparin (6.7 percent; P=0.57; absolute difference, 1.4 percentage points; 95 percent confidence interval, -3.0 to 5.7). Five patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparin had major bleeding, as compared with three patients receiving standard heparin. After randomization, the patients who received low-molecular-weight heparin spent a mean of 1.1 days in the hospital, as compared with 6.5 days for the standard-heparin group; 120 patients in the low-molecular-weight- heparin group did not need to be hospitalized at all.Low-molecular-weight heparin can be used safely and effectively to treat patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis at home.

Background The study objective was to determine the relative efficacy and safety of a low-molecular-weight heparinoid (Orgaran) compared with aspirin for the prevention of postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing surgery for fractured hips. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was used to study 251 consecutive eligible and consenting patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture in seven participating hospitals. Methods and Results Patients received either fixed-dose Orgaran by subcutaneous injection every 12 hours in a dose of 750 anti–Factor Xa units or aspirin 100 mg orally twice daily; both regimens were started 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 14 days or until discharge, if sooner. All patients had postoperative 125 I-fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography. If the results of one or both tests were positive, then venography was performed. Otherwise, venography was done at day 14, or sooner if the patient was ready for discharge. Pulmonary embolism in symptomatic patients was diagnosed on the basis of a high probability perfusion/ventilation lung scan, a positive angiogram, or a clinically significant embolism detected at autopsy. Evaluable venograms were obtained in 90 of the 125 patients randomly assigned to receive Orgaran and in 87 of the 126 patients assigned to receive aspirin. Venous thromboembolism was detected in 25 (27.8%) patients in the Orgaran group and in 39 (44.3%) patients in the aspirin group. Thus, there was a relative risk reduction of 37% with Orgaran ( P =.028; 95% confidence interval, 3.7% to 59.7%). Six (6.8%) of 88 patients in the Orgaran group and 12 (14.3%) of 84 patients in the aspirin group developed proximal deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, a relative risk reduction of 52% with Orgaran ( P =.137; 95% confidence interval, −30.7% to 84.6%). Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 2 (1.6%) patients given Orgaran and 8 (6.4%) patients given aspirin ( P =.10). There was one major bleed in the Orgaran group compared with four in the aspirin group. Conclusions This study demonstrates that Orgaran is significantly more efficacious than aspirin in preventing postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing surgery for fractured hips, with no evidence of any increase in hemorrhagic complications.

Objective To compare the relative safety and efficacy of a low-molecular-weight heparinoid (ORG 10172) with unfractionated heparin in the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Design Double-blind randomized trial. Setting Seven Canadian university-affiliated hospitals. Participants Eighty-seven patients with acute ischemic stroke resulting in lower-limb paresis. Intervention Patients received either low-molecular-weight heparinoid, 750 anti-factor Xa units twice daily, or unfractionated heparin, 5000 units subcutaneously twice daily. Treatment was continued for 14 days or until hospital discharge if sooner. Measurements Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed using 125I-labeled fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography. Venography was indicated if either test was positive. Overt hemorrhage, major or minor, was assessed clinically. Results Venous thrombosis occurred in four patients (9%) given low-molecular-weight heparinoid and in 13 patients (31%) given heparin (relative risk reduction, 71%; 95% CI, 16% to 93%. The corresponding rates for proximal vein thrombosis were 4% and 12%, respectively (relative risk reduction, 63%; P greater than 0.2). The incidence of hemorrhage was 2% in both groups. Conclusion Low-molecular-weight heparinoid, given in a fixed dose of 750 anti-factor Xa units subcutaneously twice daily, is more effective than subcutaneous low-dose heparin for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Background: Despite low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis, the incidence of venographically detected, residual deep vein thrombosis after hip and knee arthroplasty remains high, at approximately 15% and 30%, respectively. Most of these thrombi are asymptomatic and of unknown clinical significance. Nevertheless, because they have the potential to grow, limiting prophylaxis to the inhospital period may provide inadequate protection. Methods: We studied a cohort of 1984 consecutive patients who had hip or knee arthroplasty at 1 of 28 participating hospitals. Patients received enoxaparin prophylaxis, 30 mg subcutaneously every 12 hours for up to 14 days, and underwent predischarge compression ultrasonography. Study end points were symptomatic deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism during and after prophylaxis, asymptomatic venous thrombosis detected by predischarge compression ultrasonography, and major hemorrhage. The duration of follow-up was 84 days. Results: Enoxaparin treatment was started a mean (± SD) of 17.9 ± 10.4 hours after the completion of surgery and was given for a mean of 18.0 ± 6.9 doses. Eighty-two patients (4.1%; 95% confidence interval, 3.3%-5.0%) developed venous thromboembolism. The rates of thromboembolic events during and after prophylaxis were 2.1% and 2.0%, respectively. Only 3 patients (0.15%) had abnormal predischarge compression ultrasonography. Three patients (0.15%) died of pulmonary embolism. Major hemorrhage occurred in 58 patients (2.9%; 95% confidence interval, 2.2%-3.7%). Conclusions: Postoperative prophylaxis with enoxaparin for a mean of 9 days is associated with a clinically acceptable rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism and major hemorrhage. Predischarge compression ultrasonography cannot be justified. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:873-878

Objective To determine the relative efficacy and safety of low molecular weight (LMW) heparin (Enoxaparin) compared with standard calcium heparin for the prevention of postoperative deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing elective hip surgery. Design A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Patients Six hundred sixty-five consecutive patients undergoing hip replacement at five participating hospitals. Interventions Patients received either fixed-dose LMW heparin, 30 mg subcutaneously twice daily, or fixed-dose standard calcium heparin, 7500 units subcutaneously twice daily; both regimens were started 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 14 days or until discharge if sooner. Measurements All patients had postoperative I-125-fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography. If results of one or both tests were positive, then venography was done. Otherwise, venography was done between day 10 and day 14, or sooner if the patient was ready for discharge. Results Evaluable venograms were obtained in 258 of the 333 patients randomly assigned to receive LMW heparin and in 263 of the 332 patients assigned to receive calcium heparin. For patients with evaluable venograms, thrombosis was detected in 50 patients (19.4%) who received LMW heparin compared with 61 patients (23.2%) who received standard heparin (difference, -3.8%; 95% CI, -11.1% to 3.6%) (P greater than 0.2). Proximal deep vein thrombosis was detected in 5.4% of the patients receiving LMW heparin and in 6.5% of the patients receiving standard heparin (difference, -1.1%; CI, - 5.2% to 3.3%) (P greater than 0.2). For the entire group of 665 patients, venous thrombosis occurred in 17.1% given LMW heparin and in 19.0% given standard heparin. Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 31 patients (9.3%) given standard heparin and in 17 patients (5.1%) given LMW heparin (difference, 4.2%; CI, 0.3% to 8.2%) (P = 0.035). The relative risk reduction was 45%. The rate of major bleeding in the standard heparin group was 5.7% compared with 3.3% in the LMW heparin group (difference, 2.4%; CI, -1.0% to 5.4%) (P = 0.13). The relative risk reduction was 42%. Conclusion Low molecular weight heparin is significantly less hemorrhagic than standard unfractionated heparin; the difference in the rate of deep vein thrombosis, although not statistically significant (P greater than 0.2), favors the use of LMW heparin.

Differing opinions about the value of ventilation-perfusion lung scanning have created controversy concerning the correct approach to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. In a prospective study of 305 consecutive patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism and abnormal perfusion lung scans, we evaluated the role of ventilation-perfusion lung scanning, pulmonary angiography, and objective testing for venous thrombosis in the diagnostic process. Segmental or greater perfusion defects with ventilation mismatch have a high probability (86 percent) of pulmonary embolism. Contrary to current clinical practice, however, the approach of ruling against pulmonary embolism by a "low probability" scan pattern is incorrect, even with an improved technique for ventilation imaging; the frequency of pulmonary embolism in these patients ranged from 25 to 40 percent. Objective testing for venous thrombosis provides a practical alternative to performing pulmonary angiography in the diagnostic work-up; by providing an endpoint for commencing anticoagulant therapy, a positive result obviates the need for further testing in 20 to 30 percent of patients.

We report a patient with hereditary antithrombin III deficiency who was successfully treated with heparin throughout pregnancy. Functional antithrombin III levels fell to 0.32 U/ml during heparin treatment, but it was possible to achieve a heparin effect, measured by the activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin clotting time and heparin assay with subcutaneous heparin in doses of 30,000 U to 35,000 U/24 hours. This achieve an long term heparin effect was obtained without the need for antithrombin III infusions.

The clinical diagnosis of venous thrombosis is highly non-specific. The reason for this is that none of the symptoms or signs of venous thrombosis is unique to this condition--that is, each can be caused by nonthrombotic disorders. Objective testing to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of venous thrombosis, then, is mandatory in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis.

We performed a randomized double-blind trial comparing continuous intravenous heparin with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of 115 patients with acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Intermittent subcutaneous heparin as administered in this trial was inferior to continuous intravenous heparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism. The subcutaneous heparin regimen induced an initial anticoagulant response below the target therapeutic range in the majority of patients and resulted in a high frequency of recurrent venous thromboembolism (11 of 57 patients, 19.3 percent), which was virtually confined to patients with a subtherapeutic anticoagulant response. In contrast, continuous intravenous heparin induced a therapeutic anticoagulant response in the majority of patients and a low frequency of recurrent events (3 of 58 patients, 5.2 percent; P = 0.024); the recurrences were limited to patients with an initial subtherapeutic anticoagulant response. The results of this trial establish the efficacy of intravenous heparin in the treatment of proximal venous thrombosis and suggest a relation between the effectiveness of heparin and the levels of anticoagulation achieved; such a relation could explain the observed failure of the subcutaneous regimen.

Asymptomatic cervical atherosclerosis carries a variable risk of vascular events. We sought to identify patients with asymptomatic cervical bruits who may be at increased risk of developing ischemic events. We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study of neurologically asymptomatic patients presenting a cervical bruit. Patients had biannual neurologic and carotid duplex evaluation. Association between ultrasonographic findings and vascular events, adjusting for common risk factors, was evaluated. Seven hundred fifteen patients were followed on average for 3.6 years. Mean age was 65 years. At initial visit, 357 subjects had a > or = 50% stenosis. Overall, 237 events occurred in 177 patients. Annual rate of all primary vascular events in patients with > or = 50% stenosis was 11.0% versus 4.2% in those with or = 50% group compared with 1.9% in the or = 80% stenosis and 1.4% in those with stenosis or = 80% stenosis in 66% of patients. Progression of carotid stenosis particularly to more than 80% was associated both with a higher rate of ipsilateral neurologic events and overall combined vascular events. Our data suggest that severity of carotid stenosis is the main risk factor predicting occurrence of neurologic and other vascular events. Yearly rate of ipsilateral stroke with > or = 50% carotid stenosis is low (1.4%) and most are nondisabling. Progression to > or = 80% or occlusion is associated with worse outcome.

Considerable progress has been made over the last 15 years in our understanding of the natural history, diagnosis, and treatment of deep vein thrombosis.1The nonspecificity of clinical diagnosis has been confirmed by several studies,2-5and the reliability of objective tests such as fibrinogen I 125 leg scanning,6venography,7and impedance plethysmography (IPG) has been established for patients who present with their first episode of clinically suspected venous thrombosis.8,9In contrast, relatively few studies have been performed to clarify the diagnostic process in patients with a history of venous thrombosis who have recurrent symptoms of leg pain and swelling.10,11 Until recently, most of these symptomatic patients were considered to have acute recurrent deep vein thrombosis (which is potentially life-threatening) on the basis of their clinical presentation alone. They then received long-term anticoagulant therapy or, in some cases, caval interruption procedures. Some patients experienced the inconvenience of multiple hospital admissions or

Thank you for having these facts brought to our attention. I would agree with you that the sentence "we have coined the term 'thromboneurosis' to describe this syndrome" should read "we and others have coined the term 'thromboneurosis' to describe this syndrome." However, with objective testing the clinician can now have a more rational approach to differentiate thromboneurosis from recurrent deep venous thrombosis.