Search

Background:Postpancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) hemorrhage (PPH) is a life-threatening complication after PD. The main objective of this study was to evaluate incidence and factors associated with late PPH as well as the management strategy and outcomes. Methods: Between May 2017 and March 2020, clinical data from 192 patients undergoing PD were collected prospectively in the CHIRPAN Database (NCT02871336) and retrospectively analyzed. In our institution, all patients scheduled for a PD are routinely admitted for monitoring and management in intensive/intermediate care unit (ICU/IMC). Results: The incidence of late PPH was 17% (32 of 192), whereas the 90-day mortality rate of late PPH was 19% (6 of 32). Late PPH was associated with 90-day mortality (P = 0.001). Using multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for late PPH were postoperative sepsis (P = 0.036), and on day 3, creatinine (P = 0.025), drain fluid amylase concentration (P = 0.023), lipase concentration (P0.001), and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (P0.001). We developed two predictive scores for PPH occurrence, the PANCRHEMO scores. Score 1 was associated with 68.8% sensitivity, 85.6% specificity, 48.8% predictive positive value, 93.2% negative predictive value, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.841. Score 2 was associated with 81.2% sensitivity, 76.9% specificity, 41.3% predictive positive value, 95.3% negative predictive value, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.859. Conclusions: Routine ICU/IMC monitoring might contribute to a better management of these complications. Some predicting factors such as postoperative sepsis and biological markers on day 3 should help physicians to determine patients requiring a prolonged ICU/IMC monitoring.

Background Factors excluding postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), facilitating early drain removal and hospital discharge represent a novel approach in patients undergoing enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery. This study aimed to establish the relevance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in excluding POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Methods A prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent PD at two high-volume centres was used. Patients were divided into three cohorts (training, internal, and external validation). The primary endpoints of this study were accuracy, optimal timing, and cutoff values of NLR for excluding POPF after PD. Results From 2012 to 2020, in a 2:1 ratio, 451 consecutive patients were randomly sampled as training (n = 301) and validation (n = 150) cohorts. Additionally, the external validation cohort included 197 patients between 2018 and 2020. POPF was diagnosed in 135 (20.8 per cent) patients. The 90-day mortality rate was 4.1 per cent. NLR less than 8.5 on postoperative day 3 (OR, 95 per cent c.i.) was significantly associated with the absence of POPF in the training (2.41, 1.19 to 4.88; P = 0.015), internal validation (5.59, 2.02 to 15.43; P = 0.001), and external validation (5.13, 1.67 to 15.76; P = 0.004) cohorts when adjusted for relevant clinical factors. Postoperative outcomes significantly differed using this threshold. Conclusion NLR less than 8.5 on postoperative day 3 may be a simple, independent, cost-effective, and easy-to-use criterion for excluding POPF.

PURPOSE The double purse-string telescoped pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) technique has been suggested as an alternative approach to reduce the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Its efficacity in high-risk situations has not yet been explored. This study compared the incidence of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) between patients with high-risk anastomosis undergoing PG and those undergoing pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). METHODS From 2013 to 2019, 198 consecutive patients with high-risk anastomosis, an updated alternative fistula risk score > 20%, and who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with the PJ (165) or PG (33) technique were included. Optimal mitigation strategy (external stenting/octreotide omission) was applied for all patients. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CR-POPF. RESULTS The mean ua-FRS was 33%. CR-POPF (grade B/C) was found in 42 patients (21%) and postoperative hemorrhage in 30 (15%); the mortality rate was 4%. CR-POPF rates were comparable between the PJ (19%) and PG (33%) groups (P = 0.062). The PG group had a higher rate of POPF grade C (24% vs. 10%; P = 0.036), longer operative time (P = 0.019), and a higher transfusion rate (P

Several scoring systems predict risks of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy, but none have emerged as the gold standard. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of postoperative day 1 drain amylase and serum C-reactive protein levels in predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula compared with intraoperative pancreatic characteristics.Patients who underwent pancreatectomy between 2017 and 2019 were included prospectively. Cutoff values were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves, and a score combining postoperative day 1 drain amylase and serum C-reactive protein was tested in a multivariate logistic regression model to evaluate clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula risk.A total of 274 pancreatic resections (182 pancreaticoduodenectomies and 92 distal pancreatectomies) were included. The pancreatic gland texture was "soft" in 47.8% (n = 131), and 55.8% (n = 153) had a small size main pancreatic duct (≤3 mm). Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 58 patients (21.2%). Drain amylase ≥1,000 UI/L and serum C-reactive protein ≥90 mg/L were identified as the optimal cutoffs to predict clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. On multivariate analysis these cutoffs were independent predictors of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after both pancreaticoduodenectomies (drain amylase: P.001, serum C-reactive protein: P = .006) and distal pancreatectomies (drain amylase: P = .009, serum C-reactive protein: P = .001). The postoperative day 1 "90-1000" model, a 2-value score relying on these cutoffs, significantly (P.001) outperformed intraoperative pancreatic parenchymal characteristics in predicting clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after both pancreaticoduodenectomies and distal pancreatectomies. A postoperative day 1 "90-1000" score = 0 had a negative predictive value of 97% and 94%, respectively, after pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomies.A combined score relying on postoperative day 1 values of drain amylase and serum C-reactive protein levels was accurate in predicting risks of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy.

Background Emergency completion pancreatectomy (CP) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a technically demanding procedure. We report our experiences with a four-step standardized technique used at our center since 2012. Methods In the first step, the gastrojejunostomy is divided with a stapler to quickly access the pancreatic anastomosis and permit adequate exposure, especially in cases of active bleeding. Second, the bowel loops connected to the pancreatic anastomosis is divided in cases of pancreaticojejunostomy. Third, the pancreatectomy is completed with or without the splenic vessels and spleen conservation according to the local conditions. Finally, the fourth step reconstructs in a Roux-en-Y fashion and ensures drainage. Results From January 2012 to December 2019, 450 patients underwent PD at our center. Reintervention for grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula was decided for 30 patients, and CP was performed in 21 patients. The mean intraoperative blood loss and operative duration were relatively low (600 ml and 240 min, respectively). During the perioperative period, three patients died from multiple organ failure, and two patients died intraoperatively from a cataclysmic hemorrhage originating from the superior mesenteric artery. Discussion Our standardized procedure appears to be relatively safe, reproducible, and could be particularly useful for young surgeons.

The Birmingham score predicts the risk of hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This study aimed to validate the risk score in a different healthcare cohort.From 2017 to 2021, 301 patients underwent PD. The Birmingham score was applied to 276 patients. Postoperative deceased patients (n = 7) or those requiring a completion of pancreatectomy (n = 18) were excluded.Forty-seven (17%) patients were readmitted after a median delay of 9 (range 1-49) days and stayed for 5 (range 1-27) days; 4 (8.5%) died during the hospital stay. The leading cause of readmission was a septic condition (53%), mostly resolved by medical treatment (77%). A multivariate analysis identified the occurrence of a clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, the score criteria, and the score itself as independent factors favouring readmission. Readmission rates in patients with low [n = 97 (35%)], intermediate [n = 98 (36%)], and high [n = 81 (29%)] scores were 5%, 17%, and 31%, respectively (P 0.01).This study confirmed the relevance and robustness of the Birmingham risk score. Patients with a high risk of readmission after PD, identified based on the score, were discharged to a partnership medical centre close to the pancreatic centre to plan readmission and avoid futile unplanned hospitalisation.

International audience; Background: Experienced pancreatic surgeons, for whom complexity is not an issue, must decide at the end of neoadjuvant therapy whether to continue or discontinue surgery, when pancreatectomy with vascular resection is planned in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Objective: Our study aimed to determine preoperative factors that can predict short postoperative survival in such situations. Methods: Overall, 105 patients with borderline or locally advanced PDAC received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (followed by chemoradiation in 22% of patients) and underwent pancreatectomy with segmental venous and/or arterial resection at two high-volume centers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of < 1 year after surgery for patients who did not die from the surgery. Results: Tumors were classified as borderline in 78% of cases and locally advanced in 22% of cases. Mean CA19-9 at diagnosis was 934 U/mL, which significantly decreased to 213 U/mL (p < 0.01) after a median of six cycles of FOLFIRINOX. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed most often (76%). The vast majority of patients underwent venous resection (92%), and a simultaneous arterial resection was performed in 16 patients (15%). The severe morbidity rate and 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 21%, 8.5%, and 10.4%, respectively. The median OS after surgery was 23 months. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative CA19-9 ≥ 450 U/mL was the only preoperative factor independently associated with OS of < 1 year (p = 0.044). Conclusion: The preoperative CA19-9 value should be considered in the clinical decision-making process when complex vascular resection is required. © 2021, Society of Surgical Oncology.

This study aimed to determine the impact of FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant therapy on patients with non-metastatic borderline/locally advanced (BL/LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), in current practice.From 2010 to 2017, 258 patients with BL/LA PDAC from a single high-volume institution received FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant treatment.The 258 patients received a median number of 6 cycles of FOLFIRINOX (range, 3-16); 98 (38%) patients underwent curative surgery, and 160 (62%) continued medical treatment. A venous resection was performed in 57 patients (58%), and an arterial resection in 12 (12%). The postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 6.1% and 8.2%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 57 patients (59%). The median overall survival (OS) in patients who did (n = 98) or did not (n = 160) undergo surgical resection were 39 months and 19 months, respectively (P 0.001). In resected patients, the ASA 3 score (P 0.01), venous resection (P 0.01), hemorrhage (P 0.01), and R1 margin status (P = 0.03) were found to negatively influence the OS. The median OS was significantly higher in patients who did not require a venous resection (not reached vs. 26.5 months, P 0.001).Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX provided a survival benefit in BL/LA PDAC patients, particularly in those who did not ultimately require venous resection.

Background Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) are rare, with a significant malignant potential. This study aimed to determine outcomes of patients with resected PNETs according to the cystic component and confirm the accuracy of preoperative staging. Methods From 1997 to 2016, 106 patients underwent resection of PNETs, including 73 purely solid (S-PNETs, 69%), 21 mixed (M-PNETs, 20%), and 12 purely cystic lesions (C-PNETs, 11%). To ensure consistent comparisons of overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival outcomes between the 3 groups, the patients were matched according to the World Health Organization (WHO) grade and tumor height. Results Overall, the rate of correlation between the preoperative and pathological diagnoses was low in the C-PNET group (33%, P = 0.03). None of the 24 patients (23%) with metastatic disease at the time of surgery were in the C-PNET group. Furthermore, significantly more parenchyma-sparing resections (P = 0.039) and fewer enlarged resections (P = 0.019) were achieved in the C-PNET group. C-PNET group had a significantly lower node invasion rate than the S-PNET and M-PNET groups (8% vs. 41% and 24%, P = 0.004). Although median OS was comparable in all 3 groups before (P = 0.3) and after (P = 0.18) matching, higher median DFS was observed in the C-PNET group than in the other groups after matching (P = 0.038). Conclusion C-PNET was associated with a better prognosis than PNET with a solid component. The results support a wait-and-see policy in cases wherein a reliable preoperative diagnosis remains challenging.

Purpose To determine if improvement in imaging reduces the non-resection rate (NRR) among patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods From 2000 to 2019, 751 consecutive patients with PDAC were considered eligible for a intention-to-treat pancreatectomy and entered the operating room. In April 2011, our institution acquired a dual energy spectral computed tomography (CT) scanner and liver diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was included in the imaging workup. We consequently considered 2 periods of inclusion: period #1 (February 2000–March 2011) and period #2 (April 2011–August 2019). Results All patients underwent a preoperative CT scan with a median delay to surgery of 18 days. Liver DW-MRI was performed among 407 patients (54%). Median delay between CT and surgery decreased (21 days to 16 days, P P P P P P Conclusions Due to changes in our therapeutic strategies, the NRR did not decrease during two decades despite imaging improvement.

We evaluated the intuition of expert pancreatic surgeons, in predicting the associated risk of pancreatic resection and compared this “intuition” to actual operative follow-up. The objective was to avoid major complications following pancreatic resection, which remains a challenge. From January 2015 to February 2018, all patients who were 18 years old or more undergoing a pancreatic resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy [PD], distal pancreatectomy [DP], or central pancreatectomy [CP]) for pancreatic lesions were included. Preoperatively and postoperatively, all surgeons completed a form assessing the expected potential occurrence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF: grade B or C), postoperative hemorrhage, and length of stay. Preoperative intuition was assessed for 101 patients for 52 PD, 44 DP, and 5 CP cases. Overall mortality and morbidity rates were 6.9% (n = 7) and 67.3% (n = 68), respectively, and 38 patients (37.6%) developed a POPF, including 27 (26.7%) CR-POPF. Concordance between preoperative intuition of CR-POPF occurrence and reality was minimal, with a Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) of 0.175 (P value = 0.009), and the same result was obtained between postoperative intuition and reality (κ = 0.351; P

We evaluated the usefulness of the 2017 definition of borderline pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) in fit patients (performance status 0-1) based on anatomical (A) and biological dimensions (B).From 2011 to 2018, 139 resected patients with BR-PDAC according to the 2017 definition were included: 18 patients underwent upfront pancreatectomy (CA 19-9 500 U/mL and/or regional lymph node metastasis; BR-B group), and 121 received FOLFIRINOX (FX) induction chemotherapy and were divided into BR-A (CA 19-9 500 U/mL, no regional lymph node metastasis; n = 68) and BR-AB (CA 19-9 500 U/mL and/or regional lymph node metastasis; n = 53) groups.The 3 groups were comparable according to patient characteristics (except for back pain (P .01) and CA 19-9 (P .01)), intraoperative data, and postoperative courses. BR-AB patients required more venous resections (P .01). The 3 groups were comparable on pathologic findings, except that BR-B patients had more lymph node invasions (P = .02). Median overall survival (OS) of the 121 patients was 45 months. In multivariate analysis, venous resection (P = .039) and R1 resection (P = .012) were poorly linked with OS, whereas BR-A classification (P .01) independently favored OS. Median survival times of BR-A, BR-AB, and BR-B groups were undetermined, 27 months, and 20 months (P.001), respectively.The 2017 definition was relevant for sub-classifying patients with BR-PDAC. The anatomical dimension (BR-A) was a favorable prognostic factor, whereas the biological dimension (BR-AB and BR-B) poorly impacted survival.

Background: We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of resections for liver metastases (LMs) originating from pancreatic ductal adenocarci-noma (PDAC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and esophagus/ gastric cancers (EGCs), which we label as major killers (MKs; overall survival (OS) under 10%). We hypothesized that LM resection must provide the patient with almost a year of OS postoperatively that is considered beneficial. Methods: From January 2005 to December 2020, 23 patients under-went resection for isolated LM from MKs. These patients underwent surgery after a multidisciplinary discussion about their performance status, disease evolution during prolonged medical treatment, and the existence or absence of extrahepatic metastases. Results: LM originated from an PDAC, EGC, or NSCLC in 10 pa-tients (43%), nine patients (39%), and four patients (18%), respective-ly. The median delay between primary cancer and LM diagnoses was 12 months, and the median delay between LM diagnosis and liver re-section was 10 months. Most patients, who had objectively responded to medical treatment (57%), had a solitary (61%) and unilobar (70%) LM. Severe morbidity and 90-day mortality rates were 13% and 4.3%, respectively. Margin-free resection was achieved in 16 patients (70%). After liver resection, the median OS was 24 months without a statistical difference when considering the primary tumor site; 1, 3-, and 5-year OS were 70%, 23%, and 23%, respectively. Conclusion: Selection based on criteria such as good clinical condi-tion, response to treatment, and long observation period helped iden-tify patients with LM of MKs who seemed to benefit from resection.

Two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) strategy is used to treat patients with bilobar colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). However, many patients do not undergo the second hepatectomy owing to disease progression in the future liver remnant (FLR) after portal vein embolization (PVE). This study aimed to assess the impact of disease progression in the FLRs of patients who completed the first hepatectomy.68 consecutive patients underwent the first hepatectomy followed by PVE. Six patients (9%) dropped out after the PVE (two-stage failed [TSF] group) because of unresectable hepatic or general disease progression. Seventeen patients (25%) completed their second hepatectomy despite disease progression in the FLR (new CLM [nCLM] group) as it was considered resectable, while 45 patients (66%) underwent the second hepatectomy (control group).The 5-year overall survival rates in the TSF, nCLM, and control groups were 0%, 7%, and 60%, respectively (P 0.001). The median overall survival times between the TSF and nCLM groups were 26 months and 42 months (P = 0.005). Patients in the nCLM group whose hepatic disease progression was detected preoperatively versus intraoperatively had comparable survival rates.Resectable hepatic disease progression in the FLR after PVE should not be considered a contraindication for the second hepatectomy.

International audience

Surgical field photography is a tough exercise: surgeons dedicate the required time for photography even during complex surgeries; the intense lighting of the operating field works against photography, and the surgeon has to utilise whatever equipment is available. We selected five complex interventions and two surgeons (one with an iPhone

Purpose: Using a standardized specimen protocol analysis, this study aimed to evaluate the resection margin status of patients who underwent resection for either distal cholangiocarcinoma (DC) or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This allowed a precise millimetric analysis of each inked margin. Methods: From 2010 to 2018, 355 consecutively inked specimens from patients with PDAC (n = 288) or DC (n = 67) were prospectively assessed. We assessed relationships between the tumor and the following margins: transection of the pancreatic neck, bile duct, posterior surface, margin toward superior mesenteric artery, and the surface of superior mesenteric vein/portal vein groove. Resection margins were evaluated using a predefined cut-off value of 1 mm, however, clearances of 0 and 1.5 mm were also evaluated. Results: Patients with DC were mostly men (64% vs. 49%, p = 0.028), of older age (68 yo vs. 65, p = 0.033), required biliary stenting more frequently (93% vs. 77%, p &lt, 0.01), and received less neoadjuvant treatment (p &lt, 0.001) than patients with PDAC. The venous resection rate was higher among patients with PDAC (p = 0.028). Postoperative and 90-day mortality rates were comparable. Patients with PDAC had greater tumor size (28.6 vs. 24 mm, p = 0.01) than those with DC. The R1 resection rate was comparable between the two groups, regardless of the clearance margin. Among the three types of resection margins, a venous groove was the most frequent in both entities. In multivariate analysis, the R1 resection margin did not influence patient survival in either PDAC or DC. Conclusion: Our standardized specimen protocol analysis showed that the R1 resection rate was comparable in PDAC and DC.

International audience; Objectives: To compare the ablation margins and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) of perivascular versus non-perivascular liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC) and to determine the risk factors for local tumor progression (LTP) after perivascular MWA. Methods: Between June 2017 and June 2019, 84 metastases were treated: 39 perivascular (3 mm), and 46 non-perivascular. Perivascular metastases were treated with either conventional or optimized protocols (maximum power and/or several heating cycles after repositioning the needle regardless of the initial tumor dimensions). The mean diameter of metastases was 15.4 mm (SD: 7.56). Results: Vascular proximity did not result in a significant difference in ablation margins. The technical success rate, primary efficacy, and secondary efficacy were 90%, 66%, and 83%, respectively. Perivascular location was not a risk factor for time to LTP (p ¼ 0.49), RFS (p ¼ 0.52), or OS (p ¼ 0.54). LTP was statistically related to the presence of a colonic obstruction (p < 0.05), number of metastases at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.05), type of protocol (p < 0.05), ablation margins (p < 0.001) and LTP was proportional to the number of liver resections before MWA (p < 0.05). There was no LTP in tumors ablated with margins over 10 mm. Two grade 4 complications occurred. Conclusion: MWA is an effective and safe treatment for perivascular liver metastases from CRC, provided that satisfactory margins are achieved. A maximalist attitude could be related to better local control.

Postoperative aspiration pneumonitis (POAP) is a rare (1%) but worrying complication with a high mortality rate (up to 30%). 1 , 2 , 3 General anesthesia combined with gastrointestinal surgery induces digestive tract paralysis with the risk of delayed gastric emptying and consequent POAP. In the last two decades, efforts to decrease perioperative opioid use, 4 together with the rise of minimally invasive surgery, have reduced the surgical impact on digestive motility. In contrast, enhanced recovery after digestive surgery leads to decreased routine gastric tube feeding and increased early postoperative feeding, 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 which may induce gastric emptying and increase the risk of POAP, which remains a constant risk after digestive surgery, with various effects ranging from isolated radiologic signs to severe pneumonitis with multiorgan failure. To date, there have been no definitions or grading schemes for POAP, and it is difficult to draw realistic comparisons among perioperative drugs or procedures that could be effective in reducing POAP. Therefore, the present study seeks to develop a simple and reliable POAP classification that could facilitate relevant comparisons of preventive measures and postoperative courses.

Summary Purpose Survival appears to be poor in cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with para-aortic lymph node involvement (PALN+). However, resection is still performed in these cases because the prognostic impact of PALN+ remains controversial. Methods PALN+ was intraoperatively found in 14 patients (4.8%) with resectable PDAC who consequently did not undergo pancreatectomy. Results The median overall survival time after laparotomy was 21 months. The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 58.3% and 25%, respectively. Conclusions We support the advisability of reconsidering pancreatectomy in patients with intraoperatively detected PALN+ because the reported survival of such patients who undergo pancreatectomy is poorer than the survival observed for patients in our series.

Resume Introduction La survie des patients presentant un adenocarcinome pancreatique canalaire infiltrant est limitee en cas d’envahissement ganglionnaire para-aortique. La resection pancreatique est toutefois encore souvent proposee du fait d’un impact pronostique qui demeure debattu. Methode Un envahissement ganglionnaire para-aortique etait retrouve en peroperatoire chez 14 patients (4,8 %) presentant un adenocarcinome pancreatique canalaire infiltrant resecable et chez qui la pancreatectomie n’a pas ete realisee. Resultats La mediane de survie globale apres laparotomie etait de 21 mois. Les survies a 1 an et 3 ans etaient respectivement de 58 et 25 %. Conclusions Nous discutons le bien-fonde d’un geste de resection pancreatique en cas d’envahissement ganglionnaire para-aortique car les survies reportees chez les patients reseques sont inferieures a la survie des patients de notre serie.

To describe, in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the laparotomy findings, treatments and outcomes before (period 1) and after 2010 (period 2).From 2000 to 2015, patients newly diagnosed with resectable PDAC at Paoli-Calmettes Institute, France, were evaluated. Survival was examined using the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical comparisons were conducted using log rank tests.Among 1175 patients diagnosed with pancreatic mass, 164 underwent laparotomy with an intention of pancreatic resection. Some of them did not undergo pancreatic resection due to peroperative discovery of advanced disease. For those who were finally resected (n = 119), there were fewer pancreaticoduodenectomies (p = 0.045), shorter operation times (p 0.01), lower mortality rates (p = 0.02), more advanced-stage tumors (T3), more frequent perineural invasion and R1 resection in period 2. This group had a trend of better outcomes after 2010 (51 months vs. 36 months (p = 0.065)).Improvement in surgical procedures and postoperative management led to prolonged survival of those who underwent surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer since 2010, despite a higher frequency of advanced tumors at the diagnosis in our institution.

Positive para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) (station 16) are commonly detected in the final pathologic examination (ranging from 15 to 26%) among patients who undergo upfront pancreatoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) the role of positive PALN as a watershed for surgical resection remains unclear. We aimed to determine the incidence of intraoperative detection of PALN after NAT with FOLFIRINOX for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and its impact on survival, as our policy was to not resect the tumor in such situations. From January 2014 to December 2020, 136 patients with non-metastatic cancer who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and underwent explorative laparotomy were included. Intraoperative positive PALN were observed in 7 patients (5%). Patients had resectable (n = 5) or locally advanced (n = 2) disease at the time of surgery, but none of them underwent surgical resection. Positive PALN were significantly associated with a lower median number of FOLFIRINOX cycles (4 vs. 6, P = 0.05). There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with positive loco-regional lymph nodes after resection and patients with non-resection owing to positive PALN (22 versus 16 months, P = 0.16), Overall survival with positive PALN, carcinomatosis, and liver metastasis was 16, 14, and 10 months, respectively (P > 0.05). Our results suggest that NAT may lower PALN involvement. We have modified our policy, positive PALN after NAT are no longer a contraindication to resection, rather a holistic picture of the disease guides management.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. In patients where surgical resection is possible, outcome is influenced by perioperative morbidity and lymph node status. Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with improved clinical and oncological outcomes in primary and metastatic liver cancer compared with open liver resection, but evidence on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is still insufficient. The primary aim of this study was to compare overall survival for a large series of patients treated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by open or laparoscopic approach. Secondary objectives were to compare disease-free survival, predictors of death, and recurrence.Patients treated with laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from 2000 to 2018 from 3 large international databases were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient in the laparoscopic resection group (case) was matched with 1 open resection control (1:1 ratio), through a propensity score calculated on clinically relevant preoperative covariates. Overall and disease-free survival were compared between the matched groups. Predictors of mortality and recurrence were analyzed with Cox regression, and the Textbook Outcomes were described.During the study period, 855 patients met the inclusion criteria (open liver resection = 709, 82.9%; laparoscopic liver resection = 146, 17.1%). Two groups of 89 patients each were analyzed after propensity score matching, with no significant difference regarding pre- and postoperative variables. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92%, 75%, and 63% in the laparoscopic liver resection group versus 92%, 58%, and 49% in the open liver resection group (P = .0043). Adjusted Cox regression revealed severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 10.5, 95% confidence interval [1.01-109] P = .049) and steatosis (hazard ratio: 13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.23-154] P = .033) as predictors of death, and transfusion (hazard ratio: 19.2, 95% confidence interval [4.04-91.4] P.001) and severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 4.07, 95% confidence interval [1.15-14.4] P = .030) as predictors of recurrence.The survival advantage of laparoscopic liver resection over open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is equivocal, given historical bias and missing data.

To describe and study the utility of vascular suture-mediated closure systems for large bore arterial access during challenging implantation of liver intra-arterial catheters taking as a reference the conventional procedure involving patients without challenging anatomy. Between January 2017 and January 2019, 61 consecutive patients underwent 65 intra-arterial catheter IAC implantations for colorectal cancer. Twenty-three procedures (35%) considered by the operators with challenging coeliac trunk angulations were treated using a vascular suture technique where a 6-F introducer was used, the other patients were treated with a conventional 4F access technique. Clinical and radiological characteristics of patients, technical success (implantation of catheters allowing safe infusion of chemotherapy) and complications (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, CTCAE 5.0) were recorded. Mean coeliac trunk angulations were 36.3° (± 14.3) for the vascular closure group and 49.6° (± 17.1) for the conventional group. Technical success of the procedures was 100% for the vascular closure group and 80% in the conventional group (p

Introduction Lors d’une pancreatectomie avec resection veineuse tronculaire, une reconstruction par interposition d’un greffon prothetique en polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) peut etre une option meme si un taux de thrombose eleve est souvent craint. Nous rapportons les resultats d’une serie monocentrique de reconstruction par PTFE avec un protocole d’anticoagulation postoperatoire standardise. Methode De 2014 a 2019, 19 reconstruction veineuse par PTFE ont ete realise. La permeabilite prothetique etait evaluee par scanner avant la sortie puis lors des consultations iteratives. Resultats La duodenopancreatectomie cephalique (DPC) representait l’intervention la plus realisee (15 patients, 79 %) et l’adenocarcinome etait l’histologie principale (17 patients, 89 %). La prothese avait un diametre et une longueur mediane de 1 cm et 8 cm, respectivement. La duree mediane de clampage etait de 25 min. La morbidite severe et la mortalite a 90 jours etaient de 21 % et 10 %, respectivement. Aucune infection de prothese n’a ete diagnostique meme en cas de fistule pancreatique ou biliaire. Il n’y a pas eu d’accident d’anticoagulation. Une thrombose precoce ( Conclusion La reconstruction veineuse par une prothese en PTFE au cours d’une pancreatectomie est efficiente et sans risque infectieux. Notre protocole standardise permettait une permeabilite a long terme acceptable. En cas de pancreatectomie gauche, une reconstruction autologue est a recommander.

Background This study aimed to investigate the short- and long-terms outcomes of patients undergoing major hepatectomy (MH) with inferior vena cava (IVC) resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods Data from all patients who underwent MH for ICC with or without IVC resection between 2010 and 2018 were analysed retrospectively. Postoperative outcomes, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared in the whole population. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and an inverse probability weighting analysis (IPW) were performed to assess the influence of IVC resection on short- and long-terms outcomes. Results Among the 78 patients who underwent MH, 20 had IVC resection (IVC patients). Overall, the mortality and severe complication rate were 8% and 20%, respectively. IVC patients required more extended hepatectomies (p = 0.001) and had increased rates of transfusions (p = 0.001), however they did not experience increased postoperative morbidity, even after PSM. The 1-, 3- and 5-years OS and DFS were 78%, 45%, and 32% and 48%, 20%, and 16%, respectively. IVC was not associated with decreased OS (p = 0.52) and/or RFS (p = 0.85), even after IPW. Conclusion MH with IVC resection for ICC seems to provide acceptable short- and long-term results in a selected population of patients.

Background Sacrificing a replaced right hepatic artery (rRHA) from the superior mesenteric artery is occasionally necessary to obtain an R0 resection after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). Preoperative embolization (PEA) of the rRHA has been proposed to avoid the onset of postoperative biliary and ischemic liver complications. Methods Eighteen patients with cephalic PA with an rRHA underwent PEA of the rRHA from 2013 to 2019. The monitoring after embolization and PD was systematic and included a clinical-biological evaluation and a computed tomography scan. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of PEA of the rRHA, postoperative morbidity at 90 days, and quality of oncologic resection after PD. Results Feasibility of PEA was 100% without complications. A PD was performed in 16/18 patients. Mortality was 2/16 with one death after septic shock with hepatic ischemia without an arterial obstruction. Overall morbidity was 44% including one hepatic abscess after hepatic ischemia (6%). Two resections were R1 ( Conclusion PEA of the rRHA before PD was safe and reproducible. PEA of the rRHA followed by en bloc PD resection seems to limit the risk of bilio-hepatic ischemia and could facilitate oncologic resection.

Backgrounds/Aims Surgical resection remains the gold standard in the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis. However, when a patient presents with a deep solitary colorectal liver metastasis (S-CLM), the balance between the hepatic volume sacrificed and the S-CLM volume is sometimes clearly unappropriated. Thus, alternatives to surgery, such as operative and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), have been developed. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors affecting survival of patients with S-CLM who undergo curative-intent liver resection or local destruction (RFA or MWA). Methods We retrospectively identified 211 patients with synchronous or metachronous S-CLM who underwent either surgical resection (n=182) or local destruction (RFA or MWA; n=29) according to the S-CLM size, location, and surrounding Glissonian structures. Results Patients who underwent RFA or MWA had S-CLM of a smaller size than those who underwent resection (mean 19.7 vs. 37.3 mm, p

Neutropenic enterocolitis (NE) is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge associated with high mortality rates, with controversial opinions on its optimal management. Physicians are usually reluctant to select surgery as the first-choice treatment, concerns being raised regarding the potential risks associated with abdominal surgery during neutropenia. Nevertheless, no published studies comforted this idea, literature is scarce and surgery has never been compared to medical treatment. This review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic impact of abdominal surgery on outcome of neutropenic cancer patients presenting with NE, versus medical conservative treatment. This meta-analysis included studies analyzing cancer patients presenting with NE, treated with surgical or medical treatment, searched by PubMed and Cochrane databases (1983–2016), according to PRISMA recommendations. The endpoint was hospital mortality. Fixed-effects models were used. The meta-analysis included 20 studies (385 patients). Overall estimated mortality was 42.2% (95% CI = 40.2–44.2). Abdominal surgery was associated with a favorable outcome with an OR of 0.41 (95% CI = 0.23–0.74; p = 0.003). Pre-defined subgroups analysis showed that neither period of admission, underlying malignancy nor neutropenia during the surgical procedure, influenced this result. Surgery was not associated with an excess risk of mortality compared to medical treatment. Defining the optimal indications of surgical treatment is needed.Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42016048952