1. What delirium detection tools are used in routine clinical practice in the United Kingdom? Survey results from 91% of acute healthcare organisations
- Author
-
Alasdair M.J. MacLullich, Jacqueline A. Lowrey, and Zoë Tieges
- Subjects
Future studies ,Freedom of information ,Population ,Survey result ,Confusion assessment method (CAM) ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,State Medicine ,Hospital ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,mental disorders ,Health care ,medicine ,Humans ,Routine clinical practice ,4AT ,030212 general & internal medicine ,education ,Freedom of Information ,Response rate (survey) ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Brief Report ,Delirium ,medicine.disease ,United Kingdom ,nervous system diseases ,3. Good health ,Test (assessment) ,Scale (social sciences) ,Medical emergency ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Delivery of Health Care ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Key summary points Aim To seek information on delirium assessment processes and pathways in non-intensive clinical care settings in the United Kingdom (UK), and to assess usage of specific delirium assessment tools: the 4 'A's Test (4AT), Confusion Assessment Method and Single Question to identify Delirium (SQiD). Findings In total, 95% of National Health Service (NHS) units (hospitals, trusts and health boards) reported use of formal delirium assessment processes and 85% of units had guidelines or pathways in place. The 4AT was the most widely used tool, with 80% of units reporting use; the Confusion Assessment Method was reportedly used in 45% of units and the SQiD in 36% of units. Message This study shows real-world, large-scale uptake of delirium detection methods and delirium guidelines in UK hospitals, which contributes to ongoing efforts to improve delirium care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-021-00507-2., Purpose Our aim was to collect information on delirium assessment processes and pathways in non-intensive care settings in the United Kingdom (UK). Methods We sent a Freedom of Information request to 169 UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals, trusts and health boards (units) in July 2020 to obtain data on usage of delirium assessment tools in clinical practice and delirium pathways or guidelines. Results We received responses from 154/169 units (91% response rate). Of these, 146/154 (95%) units reported use of formal delirium assessment processes and 131/154 (85%) units had guidelines or pathways in place. The 4’A’s Test (4AT) was the most widely used tool, with 117/146 (80%) units reporting use. The Confusion Assessment Method was used in 65/146 (45%) units, and the Single Question to identify Delirium (SQiD) in 52/146 (36%) units. Conclusions Our findings show that the 4AT is the most commonly used tool in the UK, with 80% of units reporting use. This study adds to our knowledge of real-world uptake of delirium detection methods at scale. Future studies should evaluate real-world implementation of delirium assessment tools further via (1) tool completion rates and (2) rates of positive scores against the expected of prevalence delirium in the clinical population concerned. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41999-021-00507-2.
- Published
- 2021