Search

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the scrupulous hygiene rules and the restriction of contacts during the lockdown owing to the COVID-19 pandemic affected the rate and severity of surgical site infections (SSI) after vascular exposure in the groin at two Italian University Hospitals.Starting from March 2020, strict hygiene measures for protection of health care workers (HCW) and patients from COVID-19 infection were implemented, and partly lifted in July 2020. The main exposure for analysis purposes was the period in which patients were operated. Accordingly, study subjects were divided into two groups for subsequent comparisons (preCOVID-19 era: March-June 2018-2019 versus COVID-19 era: March-June 2020). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of superficial and/or deep SSI within 30 days after surgery. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions were used to classify superficial and deep SSI.A total of 194 consecutive patients who underwent vascular exposure in the groin were retrospectively analyzed. Of those, 60 underwent surgery from April 1, 2018 to June 30 of the same year; 83 from April 1, 2019 to June 30 of the same year; and 51 from April 1, 2020 to June 30 of the same year. The mean age of the study cohort was 75 years and 140 (72%) were males. Patients who were operated in the COVID-19 era were less likely to develop SSI (10% vs. 28%; P = 0.008), including both deep SSI (4% vs. 13%; P = 0.04) and superficial SSI (6% vs. 15%; P = 0.05). After multivariate adjustments, being operated in the COVID-19 era was found to be a negative predictor for development of an SSI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.09-0.76; P 0.001) or deep SSI (OR = 0.21; 95% CI = 0.03-0.98; P 0.001). Operative time was also found as independent predictor for the development of deep SSI (OR = 1.21; 95%CI = 1.21-1.52; P = 0.02). Using binary logistic regression, there were no independent predictors of superficial SSI that could be identified.Vascular exposure in the groin carries a non-negligible risk of SSI. In this study, we provided important insights that are simple and easily viable precautions (such as the universal use of surgical masks both for patients and health care professionals during wound care, the widespread diffusion of hand sanitizers, and the reduction of the number of visitors in the surgical wards) could be promising and safe tools for SSI risk reduction.

The aims of this study were as follows: i) to identify the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients undergoing elective endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm; ii) to assess its association with perioperative morbidity and long-term survival; and iii) to estimate its diagnostic accuracy for prediction of 5-year mortality following the intervention.We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent elective EVAR from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2019. The lean psoas muscle area (LPMA; cmThe study cohort eventually comprised 338 patients who underwent elective EVAR for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm. In the overall population, 154 patients (45.5%) were classified as sarcopenic. At baseline, patients with sarcopenia were older (mean age: 78 ± 5 versus 75 ± 7 y, P 0.001) and had lower proportion of males (73.5% versus 93.5%, P 0.001). At 5 y, the estimated survival rates were 52% versus 74% in sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic patients, respectively (P 0.001). Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, an independent association was identified between sarcopenia and all-cause mortality in the whole cohort (hazard ratio: 2.63, 95% confidence interval: 1.43-3.36, P = 0.009).Sarcopenia, defined as LPMA350 as measured on preoperative computed tomography angiography, can be highly prevalent in patients undergoing elective EVAR. Although the intervention remains safe in the short term, presence of sarcopenia was significantly associated to lower long-term survival irrespective of patients' age or gender.

A 73-year-old woman underwent urgent endovascular repair of a ruptured mycotic aortic aneurysm. A thoracic stent graft was employed as the main endograft, while the celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery were revascularized by the chimney technique and the renal arteries through the periscope technique. Postoperative computed tomography revealed a Type A1 gutter, treated by detachable coils and peripheral occlusion devices. Six-month follow-up revealed patency of the stent grafts, without endoleak or stent graft infection signs.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the approaches to reno-visceral target vessels (TVs) cannulation during branched-fenestrated endovascular aortic repair, determine the evidence base that links these approaches to clinical outcomes and identify literature gaps. METHODS A scoping review following the PRISMA Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews was performed. Available full-text studies published in English (PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases; last queried, 31 June 2022) were systematically reviewed and analysed. Data were reported as descriptive narrative or tables, without any statistical analysis nor quality assessment. RESULTS Fourteen retrospective articles were included. Seven articles studied the use of upper extremity access (UEA) during branched-fenestrated endovascular aortic repair, 3 studied the use of steerable sheaths and 4 included both approaches. A left UEA was used in 757 patients (technical success: 99%, stroke rate: 1–3%) and a right UEA in 215 patients (technical success: 92–98%, stroke rate: 0–13%). Seven studies (1066 patients) described a surgical access only (technical success: 80–99%, stroke rate: 0–13%), while 3 studies (146 patients) described a percutaneous access only (technical success: 83–90%, stroke rate: 3%) and lastly 4 studies compared UEA versus use of steerable sheaths from the transfemoral approach (TFA) (UEA: 563 patients, technical success: 95–98%, stroke rate: 1–8%; TFA: 209 patients, technical success: 98–100%, stroke rate: 0–1%). CONCLUSIONS Both UEA and TFA as cannulation approaches were associated with high technical success and low perioperative complications. Currently, there is a paucity of high-quality data to provide definitive indication. Optimal UEA in terms of side (left versus right) and approach (surgical versus percutaneous) needs further study.

This study sought to identify the factors associated with the occurrence of in-hospital serious adverse events after elective endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in older patients within the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment.Consecutive patients ages ≥75 years who received GORE EXCLUDER AAA Endoprosthesis (W.L. GoreAssociates, Inc, Flagstaff, AZ) for elective EVAR. Based on the age at index elective EVAR, patients were categorized into 3 groups for subsequent analyses: those ages 75 to 79, 80 to 84, and ≥85 years. The primary end points for this study were the incidence of serious adverse events and all-cause mortality. In-hospital complications were defined according to the International Organization for Standardization 14155 standard (https://www.iso.org/standard/71690.html) and considered serious adverse events if they led to any of the following: (1) a life-threatening illness or injury, (2) a permanent impairment of a body structure or a body function, (3) in-patient or prolonged hospitalization, or (4) medical or surgical intervention to prevent life-threatening illness or injury or permanent impairment to a body structure or a body function.Overall, 1,333 older patients (ages 75-79: n = 601; 80-84: n = 474; and ≥85: n = 258) underwent elective EVAR in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment data set and were included in the present analysis. In total, 12 patients (0.9%) died perioperatively, and 103 patients (7.7%) experienced ≥1 in-hospital serious adverse event, with 18 patients (1.3%) experiencing1 in-hospital complications. No significant differences were seen between the age groups in the rates of in-hospital serious adverse events (7.3% vs 8.2% vs 7.8%; P = .86). In logistic regression analysis, a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio = 2.014; 95% confidence interval, 1.215-3.340; P = .006) and prior requirement for dialysis (odds ratio = 4.655; 95% confidence interval, 1.087-19.928; P = .038) resulted as predictors for occurrence of in-hospital serious adverse events. In the whole cohort, the 5-year survival was 63% for patients who did not experience any in-hospital serious adverse events compared with 51% for those who experienced any complications (P = .003). Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, it was found that the occurrence of in-hospital serious adverse events (hazard ratio = 6.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-21.317; P = .003) and being underweight (hazard ratio = 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.371-35.783; P = .019) were the only independent predictors of death in ≤30 days from the initial intervention. Although age did not independently affect the risk for all-cause mortality in ≤180 days after the initial intervention, increasing age was associated with a higher risk for long-term death (ie, ≥181 days from index elective EVAR) in the multivariable analysis (ages 75-79: hazard ratio = 0.379; 95% confidence interval, 0.281-0.512; P.001; and 80-84: hazard ratio = 0.562; 95% confidence interval, 0.419-0.754; P.001).After elective EVAR in older patients (ie, ≥75 years), the occurrence of in-hospital serious adverse events appears to increase the risk of death, particularly in ≤180 days after the initial elective EVAR intervention, and might be related to patient baseline characteristics, including history of pulmonary and renal disease.

The advent and refinement of complex endovascular techniques in the last two decades has revolutionized the field of vascular surgery. This has allowed an effective minimally invasive treatment of extensive disease involving the pararenal and the thoracoabdominal aorta. Fenestrated-branched EVAR (F/BEVAR) now represents a feasible technical solution to address these complex diseases, moving the proximal sealing zone above the renal-visceral vessels take-off and preserving their patency. The aim of this paper was to provide a narrative review on the peri-operative management of patients undergoing F/BEVAR procedures for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JAAA), pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (PRAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurism (TAAA). It will focus on how to prevent, diagnose, and manage the complications ensuing from these complex interventions, in order to improve clinical outcomes. Indeed, F/BEVAR remains a technically, physiologically, and mentally demanding procedure. Intraoperative adverse events often require prolonged or additional procedures and complications may significantly impact a patient’s quality of life, health status, and overall cost of care. The presence of standardized preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative pathways of care, together with surgeons and teams with significant experience in aortic surgery, should be considered as crucial points to improve clinical outcomes. Aggressive prevention, prompt diagnosis and timely rescue of any major adverse events following the procedure remain paramount clinical needs.

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a risk prediction model for "PREdiction of long-term MortalitY for patients with severe asYmptomatic de-novo carotid StEnosis undergoing Carotid EndArterectomy (PREMYData were collected retrospectively from a dedicated database on consecutive patients who underwent elective CEA for severe (70% according to NASCET criteria) asymptomatic carotid stenosis at two Italian University Hospitals from 2008 through 2016. Internal validation of the score was performed after random sampling in a 3:1 fashion. The primary endpoint of the PREMYA total of 901 patients were included in the derivation cohort while the validation cohort included 313 patients. By performing multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination, a parsimonious model was derived A risk score incorporating 8 risk factors was generated and found to be highly predictive of long-term mortality in the derivation (OR, 1.38; 95% CI 1.28 - 1.41; p0.001) and validation (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.21 -1.37, p0.001) cohorts. The discrimination power in ROC curve analysis was C= 0.775 (95% CI 0.74-.80), while the optimism-corrected AUC in bootstrapped samples was 0.761 (P.001). A strong correlation was found between predicted mortality rates and actual mortality rates in the validation cohort (r = 0.71, p0.001).This study describes development, evaluation, and validation of a risk prediction model (PREMY

Introduction The aim of the study was to evaluate the short-term and mid-term technical and clinical outcomes of the Bolton Treo endograft in subjects with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) requiring endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and assess if presence of hostile proximal neck would represent a risk factor for increased failure rates. Methods A retrospective review of all consecutive patients who had undergone elective or non-elective EVAR with the Bolton Treo endograft at five institutions located in the North-East of Italy (January 2016-December 2020) was performed. The main exposure variable for this study was presence of hostile (HAN) or friendly (FAN) aortic neck. Results A total of 137 consecutive patients were treated with the Bolton Treo endograft at participating institutions; of these 63 (46%) presented HAN while 74 (54%) had FAN. At baseline, no significant differences were observed in the distribution of demographics and comorbidities between study groups. Two type Ia endoleaks (EL) were detected at completion angiography, all in patients with HAN but none in patients with FAN (3% vs 0%, p=.04), but no type III EL were identified in the whole cohort. The median duration of follow-up in the study cohort was 30 months (IQR 22-34 months) and was similar between study groups (p=.87). At three-years, survival estimates were 89% and 91% (p=.82) in patients with HAN and FAN, respectively. At three years, patients with HAN had significantly lower freedom from type IA endoleak as compared with patients with FAN (87% vs 94%, p=.02). No significant differences were found between study groups in the three-year estimates of freedom from reinterventions (80% vs 86%, p=.28). Using cox proportional hazards, presence of type II EL (HR 3.15, 95%CI 1.18-8.5, p=.02) and presence of type IA EL (HR 4.22, 95%CI 1.39-12.85, p=.01) were found as independent predictors for reinterventions in univariate analysis, although they were no longer significant in the multivariate model. Freedom from sac increase >5mm at three years were not significantly different between study groups (92% vs 91%, p=.95). Conclusions Within a contemporary multicentric real-world experience, EVAR with the Bolton Treo endograft shows a satisfactory safety profile in the immediate postoperative phase and acceptable outcomes during mid-term follow-up. Presence of HAN is correlated with development of type Ia EL (either early following stent-graft implantation or late after EVAR) which, in turn, may represent a significant factor leading to reinterventions.

The aim was to determine the clinical impact of routine cardiology consultation before carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in neurologically asymptomatic patients, in terms of early and long term cardiovascular events.A single centre retrospective review of consecutive patients receiving CEA from 2007 to 2017 for asymptomatic carotid stenosis was performed. Two groups were compared: patients operated on from 2007 to 2012 received a pre-operative cardiology consultation only in selected cases (group A); from 2012 to 2017 patients received a routine pre-operative cardiology consultation (group B). In hospital death, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, dysrhythmias, and stroke were compared. A multiple logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of peri-operative complications. Long term overall survival and freedom from fatal cardiovascular events were compared.In total, 878 CEAs were performed in group A and 1094 in group B. Patients in group B were more likely to have had a previous coronary intervention (0.5% vs. 5.1%; p .001), and to be on dual antiplatelet (4.6% vs. 9.5%; p = .001), statin therapy (60.3% vs. 72.4%; p .001), and a higher number of cardiac drugs (1.77 ± 1.22 vs. 1.92 ± 1.23; p = .01) at the time of CEA. In hospital mortality was 0.1% for both groups (p = 1.0), and there were no significant differences regarding neurological complications (0.8% vs. 0.3%; p = .20); group B had a significant reduction in overall cardiac complications (3.4% vs. 1.9%; p = .05) and MI (1.6% vs. 0.6%; p = .05). Multivariable analysis confirmed that routine cardiology consultation was an independent predictor of MI (odds [OR] ratio 0.61; p = .04) and overall reduction in cardiac complications (OR 0.28; p = .01). At five years, overall survival was similar (84.2% vs. 82.4%; p = .72), but patients in group B had a significantly lower mortality from cardiovascular events (92.0% vs. 95.8%; p = .04).Routine cardiology consultation before elective CEA in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis reduced peri-operative cardiac complications and long term fatal cardiovascular events. This approach may be considered to maximise the risk/benefit ratio of CEA in asymptomatic patients.

BACKGROUND The role of shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in symptomatic patients is unclear. The aim was to evaluate early outcomes of CEA with routine "delayed" shunt insertion, for patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. METHODS we conducted a single-center retrospective review of symptomatic patients undergoing CEA (2009-2020). All CEAs were performed under general anesthesia using a standardized technique, based on delayed routine shunt insertion after plaque removal. Primary endpoints were 30-days mortality and stroke. A logistic regression was performed to identify clinical and procedural factors predictors of post-operative stroke. A literature systematic review was conducted using the terms "carotid endarterectomy" "stroke", "transient ischemic attack", "symptomatic carotid stenosis", and "shunt". RESULTS two-hundred-sixty-three CEAs were performed for TIA (n=178, 47%) or acute ischemic stroke (n=85, 32%). Mean delay of surgery was 6±19 days, and early CEA (

We evaluated the early and midterm outcomes of the Incraft (Cordis Corp, Bridgewater, NJ) ultra-low-profile endograft by analyzing data from the Triveneto Incraft Registry (TIR).TIR is an independent multicenter cohort registry of 10 vascular surgery units in the Triveneto area (Northeast Italy). A prospective analysis of patients electively treated with Incraft from September 2014 to June 2019 was performed. The main outcomes were technical success, major 30-day complications, 30-day aneurysm-related death, freedom from reintervention, and mortality rate during follow-up and were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Univariable Cox regression was used to evaluate the associations between anatomic complexity factors and reintervention.During the study period, 209 patients were included in the registry. Their mean age was 76.9 ± 7.7 years and the Society for Vascular Surgery comorbidity score was 0.97 ± 0.52. Most patients (n = 181; 86.6%) had presented with at least one complex anatomic factor: aortic neck angle α 135° in 31 patients (14.8%), conic neck in 17 patients (8.2%), iliac tortuosity index τ1.5 in 102 (48.8%), iliac artery calcification50% in 106 (50.7%), and external iliac artery 6 mm in 45 (21.5%). The concurrent presence of two or more complex iliac anatomic factors was present in 67 patients (32.1%). The technical success rate was 99.5%, and the early major complication rate was 1.5% (one limb occlusion, one iliac branch stenosis, one type III endoleak [EL]). No 30-day mortality was recorded. The mean follow-up period was 18.5 ± 13.2 months. The overall mortality was 9.5% (n = 18), none related to the aneurysm. The freedom from reintervention rate was 92.1%. Of these patients, six (3.2%) had been treated for type II EL embolization, one (0.5%) for type IA EL, four (2.1%) for iliac branch occlusion, and one (0.5%) for flow-limiting external iliac artery dissection. None of the single anatomic factors analyzed were predictive of reintervention. However, the association of two or more complex iliac anatomic factors was predictive of related reintervention (hazard ratio, 7.25; P = .014). The crude reintervention rate in this complex subgroup of patients was low (4 of 67; 6%).Data from the TIR have demonstrated excellent early and midterm outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair using the Incraft stent graft in patients with complex anatomy. The concurrent presence of two or more complex iliac anatomic factors still represent an issue for endovascular aneurysm repair success. However, the technical characteristics of this device resulted in low intervention rates, even for patients with these challenging issues.

Background Provisional Extension To Induce Complete Attachment (PETTICOAT) technique has shown good results in the treatment of acute type B aortic dissections (ABAD). Usually, uncovered tubular stainless steel stents are used to promote distal true lumen reattachment. Methods We describe the Petticoat technique using a conic self-expanding nitinol device as distal uncovered stent in five cases of complicated ABAD. We used as distal uncovered stent the single-flared E-XL (Jotec-GmbH). Results In one case, renal arteries were successfully stented through the large cells of the E-XL. No perioperative complications were reported. During follow-up (18–24 months), positive remodeling of the entire aorta occurred in 3 cases; in 1 case with associated thoracoabdominal aneurysm, false lumen thrombosis at the thoracic level with true lumen expansion at the visceral aorta was detected at the 18-month CT angiogram, and in 1 patient with Marfan syndrome, open surgical conversion with the E-XL explantation was performed after 24 months due to aneurysmal evolution at the visceral level. Conclusions The E-XL can be successfully used in ABAD. It adapts to different aortic diameters, and its major radial force promotes successful positive remodeling. The open cell structure allows visceral arteries stenting, and it can be removed without complications during open conversion.

Renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) are localized dilatations of the renal artery or its branches, exceeding twice the diameter of the native artery. They are uncommon and their treatment is often a challenge for the vascular surgeon.