Search

Acromegaly/giantism results from the chronic excess of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), in more than 96% of cases, due to a GH-secreting pituitary adenoma. Primary treatment of choice is transsphenoidal resection of the adenoma. More than 30% to 40% of operated cases require adjunctive forms of treatment, be it pharmacological or radiotherapeutical. The multimodal treatment of acromegaly has resulted in substantial improvements in the quality of life and life expectancy of these patients. We herein present the complex case of a patient with acromegaly due to a mammosomatotrope adenoma, with a germ-line AIP (aryl hydrocarbon receptor–interacting protein) mutation, who had a chronic and protracted course of more than 15 years during which he was treated with surgery, somatostatin receptor ligands, dopamine agonist, and the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant. At one point, he was able to come off medications and was even found to be transiently GH-deficient, only to develop acromegaly again after a couple of years.

Over 20 years ago, Hanahan and Weinberg published a seminal review that addressed the biological processes that underly malignant transformation. This classical review, along with two revisions published in 2011 and 2022, has remain a classic of the oncology literature. Since many of the addressed biological processes may apply to non-malignant tumorigenesis, we evaluated to what extent these hallmarks pertain to the development of pituitary adenomas.Some of the biological processes analyzed in this review include genome instability generated by somatic USP8 and GNAS mutations in Cushing's diseases and acromegaly respectively; non-mutational epigenetic reprograming through changes in methylation; induction of angiogenesis through alterations of VEGF gene expression; promotion of proliferative signals mediated by EGFR; evasion of growth suppression by disrupting cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors; avoidance of immune destruction; and the promotion of inflammation mediated by alteration of gene expression of immune check points. We also elaborate further on the existence of oncogene induced senescence in pituitary tumors. We conclude that a better understanding of these processes can help us dilucidated why pituitary tumors are so resistant to malignant transformation and can potentially contribute to the development of novel anticancer treatments.