Search

PurposeAs part of the special issue on 'Women in Science', this review offers a perspective on past and ongoing work in the field of normal (non-cancer) tissue radiation biology, highlighting the work of many of the leading contributors to this field of research. We discuss some of the hypotheses that have guided investigations, with a focus on some of the critical organs considered dose-limiting with respect to radiation therapy, and speculate on where the field needs to go in the future.ConclusionsThe scope of work that makes up normal tissue radiation biology has and continues to play a pivotal role in the radiation sciences, ensuring the most effective application of radiation in imaging and therapy, as well as contributing to radiation protection efforts. However, despite the proven historical value of preclinical findings, recent decades have seen clinical practice move ahead with altered fractionation scheduling based on empirical observations, with little to no (or even negative) supporting scientific data. Given our current appreciation of the complexity of normal tissue radiation responses and their temporal variability, with tissue- and/or organ-specific mechanisms that include intra-, inter- and extracellular messaging, as well as contributions from systemic compartments, such as the immune system, the need to maintain a positive therapeutic ratio has never been more urgent. Importantly, mitigation and treatment strategies, whether for the clinic, emergency use following accidental or deliberate releases, or reducing occupational risk, will likely require multi-targeted approaches that involve both local and systemic intervention. From our personal perspective as five 'Women in Science', we would like to acknowledge and applaud the role that many female scientists have played in this field. We stand on the shoulders of those who have gone before, some of whom are fellow contributors to this special issue.

Transparency, openness, and reproducibility are important characteristics in scientific publishing. Although many researchers embrace these characteristics, data sharing has yet to become common practice. Nevertheless, data sharing is becoming an increasingly important topic among societies, publishers, researchers, patient advocates, and funders, especially as it pertains to data from clinical trials. In response, ASTRO developed a data policy and guide to best practices for authors submitting to its journals. ASTRO's data sharing policy is that authors should indicate, in data availability statements, if the data are being shared and if so, how the data may be accessed.

Background: The recent rediscovery of the FLASH effect, a normal tissue sparing phenomenon observed in ultra‐high dose rate (UHDR) irradiations, has instigated a surge of research endeavors aiming to close the gap between experimental observation and clinical treatment. However, the dependences of the FLASH effect and its underpinning mechanisms on beam parameters are not well known, and large‐scale in vivo studies using murine models of human cancer are needed for these investigations. Purpose: To commission a high‐throughput, variable dose rate platform providing uniform electron fields (≥15 cm diameter) at conventional (CONV) and UHDRs for in vivo investigations of the FLASH effect and its dependences on pulsed electron beam parameters. Methods: A murine whole‐thoracic lung irradiation (WTLI) platform was constructed using a 1.3 cm thick Cerrobend collimator forming a 15 × 1.6 cm2 slit. Control of dose and dose rate were realized by adjusting the number of monitor units and couch vertical position, respectively. Achievable doses and dose rates were investigated using Gafchromic EBT‐XD film at 1 cm depth in solid water and lung‐density phantoms. Percent depth dose (PDD) and dose profiles at CONV and various UHDRs were also measured at depths from 0 to 2 cm. A radiation survey was performed to assess radioactivation of the Cerrobend collimator by the UHDR electron beam in comparison to a precision‐machined copper alternative. Results: This platform allows for the simultaneous thoracic irradiation of at least three mice. A linear relationship between dose and number of monitor units at a given UHDR was established to guide the selection of dose, and an inverse‐square relationship between dose rate and source distance was established to guide the selection of dose rate between 20 and 120 Gy·s−1. At depths of 0.5 to 1.5 cm, the depth range relevant to murine lung irradiation, measured PDDs varied within ±1.5%. Similar lateral dose profiles were observed at CONV and UHDRs with the dose penumbrae widening from 0.3 mm at 0 cm depth to 5.1 mm at 2.0 cm. The presence of lung‐density plastic slabs had minimal effect on dose distributions as compared to measurements made with only solid water slabs. Instantaneous dose rate measurements of the activated copper collimator were up to two orders of magnitude higher than that of the Cerrobend collimator. Conclusions: A high‐throughput, variable dose rate platform has been developed and commissioned for murine WTLI electron FLASH radiotherapy. The wide field of our UHDR‐enabled linac allows for the simultaneous WTLI of at least three mice, and for the average dose rate to be modified by changing the source distance, without affecting dose distribution. The platform exhibits uniform, and comparable dose distributions at CONV and UHDRs up to 120 Gy·s−1, owing to matched and flattened 16 MeV CONV and UHDR electron beams. Considering radioactivation and exposure to staff, Cerrobend collimators are recommended above copper alternatives for electron FLASH research. This platform enables high‐throughput animal irradiation, which is preferred for experiments using a large number of animals, which are required to effectively determine UHDR treatment efficacies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Exposure to high-dose ionizing radiation can lead to life-threatening injuries and mortality. Bone marrow is the most sensitive organ to radiation damage, resulting in the hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS) with the potential sequelae of infection, hemorrhage, anemia, and death if untreated. The development of medical countermeasures (MCMs) to protect or mitigate radiation injury is a medical necessity. In our well-established murine model of H-ARS we have demonstrated that the prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) analog 16,16 dimethyl-PGE2 (dmPGE2) has survival efficacy as both a radioprotectant and radiomitigator. The purpose of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and biodistribution of dmPGE2 when used as a radioprotector in irradiated and non-irradiated inbred C57BL/6J mice, PK in irradiated and non-irradiated Jackson Diversity Outbred (JDO) mice, and the PK profile of dmPGE2 in non-irradiated non-human primates (NHPs). The C57BL/6J and JDO mice each received a single subcutaneous (SC) dose of 35 ug of dmPGE2 and were randomized to either receive radiation 30 min later or remain non-irradiated. Plasma and tissue PK profiles were established. The NHP were dosed with 0.1 mg/kg by SC administration and the PK profile in plasma was established. The concentration time profiles were analyzed by standard non-compartmental analysis and the metrics of AUC0–Inf, AUC60–480 (AUC from 60–480 min), Cmax, and t1/2 were evaluated. AUC60–480 represents the postirradiation time frame and was used to assess radiation effect. Overall, AUC0–Inf, Cmax, and t1/2 were numerically similar between strains (C57BL/6J and JDO) when combined, regardless of exposure status (AUC0–Inf: 112.50 ng·h/ml and 114.48 ng·h/ml, Cmax: 44.53 ng/ml and 63.96 ng/ml; t1/2: 1.8 h and 1.1 h, respectively). PK metrics were numerically lower in irradiated C57BL/6J mice than in non-irradiated mice [irradiation ratio: irradiated values/non-irradiated values = 0.71 for AUC60–480 (i.e., 29% lower), and 0.6 for t1/2]. In JDO mice, the radiation ratio was 0.53 for AUC60–480 (i.e., 47% lower), and 1.7 h for t1/2. The AUC0–Inf, Cmax, and t1/2 of the NHPs were 29.20 ng·h/ml, 7.68 ng/ml, and 3.26 h, respectively. Despite the numerical differences seen between irradiated and non-irradiated groups in PK parameters, the effect of radiation on PK can be considered minimal based on current data. The biodistribution in C57BL/6J mice showed that dmPGE2 per gram of tissue was highest in the lungs, regardless of exposure status. The radiation ratio for the different tissue AUC60–480 in C57BL/6J mice ranged between 0.5–1.1 (50% lower to 10% higher). Spleen, liver and bone marrow showed close to twice lower exposures after irradiation, whereas heart had a 10% higher exposure. Based on the clearance values from mice and NHP, the estimated allometric scaling coefficient was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.86). While slightly higher than the current literature estimates of 0.75, this scaling coefficient can be considered a reasonable estimate and can be used to scale dmPGE2 dosing from animals to humans for future trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cell line misidentification and contamination are major contributors to the reproducibility crisis in academic research. Authentication of cell lines provides assurances of the data generated; however, commercially available cells are often not subjected to rigorous identification testing. In this study, commercially available cell lines underwent testing to confirm cell identity and purity. The methods reported here outline the best practices for cell line authentication. Briefly, a commercially available primary rabbit aortic endothelial cell line was purchased for the intent of producing target proteins necessary for generating species-specific recombinant antibodies. These rabbit-specific antibodies would then be utilized for the development of in-house enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to evaluate blood-based biomarkers of vascular injury after total-body irradiation. To authenticate the cell line, cell identity and purity were determined by single tandem repeat (STR) testing, flow cytometry, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (CO1) DNA Barcoding in-house and/or through commercial vendors. Fresh cells obtained from a New Zealand White rabbit (Charles River, Wilmington, DE) were used as a positive control. The results of STR and flow cytometry analyses indicated the cells were not contaminated with human or mouse cells, and that the cells were not of endothelial origin. PCR demonstrated that cells were also not of rabbit origin, which was further confirmed by a third-party vendor. An unopened vial of cells was submitted to another vendor for CO1 DNA Barcoding analysis, which identified the cells as being purely of bovine origin. Results revealed that despite purchase through a commercial vendor, the cell line marketed as primary rabbit aortic endothelial cells were of bovine origin. Purity analysis found cells were misidentified rather than contaminated. Further investigation to determine the cell type was not performed. The most cost-effective and efficient methodology for confirming cell line identity was found to be CO1 DNA Barcoding performed by a commercial vendor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]