Search

The most important geometric characteristic of stereotactic treatment is the accuracy of positioning the target at the treatment isocenter and the accuracy of directing the radiation beam at the treatment isocenter. Commonly, the radiation isocenter is used as the reference for the treatment isocenter, but its method of localization is not strictly defined, and it depends on the linac‐specific beam steering parameters. A novel method is presented for determining the linac mechanical isocenter position and size based on the localization of the collimator axis of rotation at arbitrary gantry angle. The collimator axis of rotation position is determined from the radiation beam center position corrected for the focal spot offset. The focal spot offset is determined using the image center shift method with a custom‐design rigid phantom with two sets of ball‐bearings. Three specific quality assurance (QA) applications and assessment methods are also presented to demonstrate the functionality of linac mechanical isocenter position and size determination in clinical practice. The first is a mechanical and radiation isocenters coincidence test suitable for quick congruence assessment of these two isocenters for a selected energy, usually required after a nonroutine linac repair and/or energy adjustment. The second is a stereotactic beam isocentricity assessment suitable for pretreatment stereotactic QA. The third is a comprehensive linac geometrical performance test suitable for routine linac QA. The uncertainties of the method for determining mechanical isocenter position and size were measured to be 0.05 mm and 0.04 mm, respectively, using four available photon energies, and were significantly smaller than those of determining the radiation isocenter position and size, which were 0.36 mm and 0.12 mm respectively. It is therefore recommended that the mechanical isocenter position and size be used as the reference linac treatment isocenter and a linac mechanical characteristic parameter respectively.

The most important geometric characteristics of SRS/SBRT treatments are precise target localisation and precise aiming of the radiation beam at the target. The AAPM-RSS Medical Physics Practice Guideline 9.a. for SRS/SBRT recommends that the radiation isocentricity (i.e. beam deviation from the isocentre) should not exceed 1 mm for SRS and 1.5 mm for SBRT. Minimising the beam deviations from the treatment target, largely due to the gantry sag, can improve the accuracy of radiosurgery and stereotactic treatments and commonly beam steering parameters are optimised to achieve this objective. This study aims to investigate, as a proof of concept, if it is possible to eliminate the beam deviations on Elekta linear accelerators altogether by optimising gantry angle dependent beam steering parameters, as stored in look-up tables. The investigation used the EPID-based Winston-Lutz test at 13 gantry angles separated every 30° (from − 180° to + 180°). Elekta linacs have two look-up tables that can be customised explicitly for radial beam angle and transverse beam position. Modifications of the radial look-up table were limited by the radial beam asymmetry inhibit of more than 5%, as measured by the linac in-built ionisation chamber. Therefore, only small radial beam deviation reductions of 0.1 mm were achieved (on average from 0.37 to 0.26 mm) while radial beam symmetry changed significantly by up to ± 7%, depending on the gantry angle as measured by the IC Profiler™. The optimised transverse look-up table resulted in reduction of transverse beam deviations to almost zero (on average from 0.20 to 0.03 mm), however, that changed the transverse beam symmetry by almost a constant value of 1%, as measured by the IC Profiler™. Ideally, two additional look-up tables are needed for effective beam steering, one for radial beam position and one for transverse beam angle. Four look-up tables in total would enable customising beam centre position and beam symmetry at any gantry angle that would minimize radiation isocentre size without compromising beam symmetry.

Acceptance and commissioning of a linear accelerator is the process of preparing it for clinical use. One of the initial important dosimetric tasks for X-ray beam set-up and use is to optimise the trajectory of the electron beam before it hits the target (focal spot). The main purpose of this study is to characterise the effect of the focal spot position (offset) on the photon beam symmetry and centre position, as well as on linac radiation isocentre size and position for an Elekta Synergy® linac. For this machine, the initial electron beam steering control items 2T and Bending F were altered to steer the beam in both transverse and radial directions respectively. The IC Profiler™ was utilised to measure the photon beam symmetry and centre position; the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and the authors’ published ready-to-go procedure were used to measure the focal spot offset; and the radiation isocentre size and position were measured using the EPID, the Elekta ball-bearing phantom and in-house software. It was observed that for the 6MV beam investigated, beam symmetry shows a high dependency on the focal spot position, with correlation coefficients of 8.6%/mm and 5.6%/mm in transverse and radial directions respectively. The radiation isocentre size shows dependency of 1.7 mm/mm on focal spot position in the transverse direction only. The radiation isocentre longitudinal position shows dependency of − 1.8 mm/mm on the focal spot position in the radial direction only. The beam centre position is directly correlated with the focal spot position in both directions, but the correlation coefficient depends on the collimation used in a given direction i.e. MLC (− 1.5 mm/mm) or diaphragms (− 0.8 mm/mm). Based on the results, a fast beam steering method was proposed and used successfully on an Elekta Versa HD™ linac, utilizing the IC Profiler™ and its associated Gantry Mounting Fixture™ (GMF) to efficiently and effectively optimise beam steering parameters for clinical use. Independent validation of the method showed that focal spot offsets and beam symmetries in terms of absolute deviations were on average 0.08 ± 0.05 mm (1SD) and 0.70 ± 0.27% (1SD) respectively.

The assessment of the coincidence of imaging and radiation isocenters is an important task of regular quality assurance of medical linear accelerators (linacs) as recommended in national and international quality assurance guidelines. A previously reported investigation of the accuracy of the Elekta XVI software to localize the linac radiation isocenter, by comparing statistically with other independent software, has shown some discrepancies at the sub‐mm level. A further investigation is carried out here using a set of reference images and mathematical operations to observe how the Elekta XVI software analyses them. Symmetric mathematical operations on reference images should result in symmetrical outcomes. Three different rotation functions are used in increasing degree of complexity to characterize the Elekta XVI software error in the linac radiation isocenter position. No independent algorithms or phantoms are used in this methodology. The magnitude and direction of the radiation isocenter localization error has been determined to be consistently 0.13 mm or 0.14 mm in the longitudinal direction towards the target depending on the case. The radiation isocenter localization error comprises two separated errors of the Ball Bearing Center by 0.13 mm and MV Field Center by either 0.00 mm or −0.01 mm in the longitudinal direction towards the target. The calculation of the MV Field Center is influenced by the polymethyl methacrylate rod supporting the ball‐bearing. The precise value and the root cause of the error cannot be assessed due to the rounding effect of the results reported by the Elekta XVI software and lack of access to the source code.

Acceptance and commissioning of a linear accelerator is the process of preparing it for clinical use. One of the initial important dosimetric tasks for X-ray beam set-up and use is to optimise the trajectory of the electron beam before it hits the target (focal spot). The main purpose of this study is to characterise the effect of the focal spot position (offset) on the photon beam symmetry and centre position, as well as on linac radiation isocentre size and position for an Elekta Synergy® linac. For this machine, the initial electron beam steering control items 2T and Bending F were altered to steer the beam in both transverse and radial directions respectively. The IC Profiler™ was utilised to measure the photon beam symmetry and centre position; the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and the authors' published ready-to-go procedure were used to measure the focal spot offset; and the radiation isocentre size and position were measured using the EPID, the Elekta ball-bearing phantom and in-house software. It was observed that for the 6MV beam investigated, beam symmetry shows a high dependency on the focal spot position, with correlation coefficients of 8.6%/mm and 5.6%/mm in transverse and radial directions respectively. The radiation isocentre size shows dependency of 1.7 mm/mm on focal spot position in the transverse direction only. The radiation isocentre longitudinal position shows dependency of - 1.8 mm/mm on the focal spot position in the radial direction only. The beam centre position is directly correlated with the focal spot position in both directions, but the correlation coefficient depends on the collimation used in a given direction i.e. MLC (- 1.5 mm/mm) or diaphragms (- 0.8 mm/mm). Based on the results, a fast beam steering method was proposed and used successfully on an Elekta Versa HD™ linac, utilizing the IC Profiler™ and its associated Gantry Mounting Fixture™ (GMF) to efficiently and effectively optimise beam steering parameters for clinical use. Independent validation of the method showed that focal spot offsets and beam symmetries in terms of absolute deviations were on average 0.08 ± 0.05 mm (1SD) and 0.70 ± 0.27% (1SD) respectively.

A novel phantomless, EPID‐based method of measuring the beam focal spot offset of a linear accelerator was proposed and validated for Varian machines. In this method, one set of jaws and the MLC were utilized to form a symmetric field and then a 180o collimator rotation was utilized to determine the radiation isocenter defined by the jaws and the MLC, respectively. The difference between these two isocentres is directly correlated with the beam focal spot offset of the linear accelerator. In the current work, the method has been considered for Elekta linacs. An Elekta linac with the Agility® head does not have two set of jaws, therefore, a modified method is presented making use of one set of diaphragms, the MLC and a full 360o collimator rotation. The modified method has been tested on two Elekta Synergy® linacs with Agility® heads and independently validated. A practical guide with instructions and a MATLAB ® code is attached for easy implementation.

Modern day Stereotactic treatments require high geometric accuracy of the delivered treatment. To achieve the required accuracy the IGRT imaging isocenter needs to closely coincide with the treatment beam isocenter. An influence on this isocenter coincidence and on the spatial positioning of the beam itself is the alignment of the treatment beam focal spot with collimator rotation axis. The positioning of the focal spot is dependent on the linac beam steering and on the stability of the monitor chamber and beam steering servo system. As such, there is the potential for focal spot misalignment and this should be checked on a regular basis. Traditional methods for measuring focal spot position are either indirect, inaccurate, or time consuming and hence impractical for routine use. In this study a novel, phantomless method has been developed using the EPID (Electronic Portal Imaging Device) that utilizes the different heights of the MLC and jaws. The method has been performed on four linear accelerators and benchmarked against an alternate ion chamber‐based method. The method has been found to be reproducible to within ±0.012 mm (1 SD) and in agreement with the ion chamber‐based method to within 0.001 ± 0.015 mm (1 SD). The method could easily be incorporated into a departmental routine linac QA (Quality Assurance) program.

The effectiveness of radiotherapy treatments depends on the accuracy of the dose delivery process. The majority of radiotherapy courses are delivered on linear accelerators with a Multi Leaf Collimator (MLC) in 3D conformal Radiation Therapy, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) modes that require accurate MLC positioning. This study investigates the MLC calibration accuracy, following manufacturer procedures for an Elekta Synergy linac with the Agility head, against the radiation focal spot offset (alignment with the collimator axis of rotation). If the radiation focal spot is not aligned ideally with the collimator axis of rotation then a systematic error can be introduced into the calibration procedure affecting absolute MLC leaf positions. Calibration of diaphrams is equally affected; however they are not investigated here. The results indicate that an estimated 0.15 mm MLC uncertainty in all MLC leaves positions can be introduced due to uncertainty of the radiation focal spot position of 0.21 mm.

An efficient procedure has been developed using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and in-house written software for verification of a target simulator alignment with the radiation isocentre. A 5 mm tungsten ball is aligned to a linac isocentre based on a lasers intersection point. The BrainLab(®) m3™ add-on multileaf collimator (MLC) forms a rectangular open field of 1.8 × 1.8 cm(2). At five different gantry and couch positions, EPID images are acquired. A computer search algorithm determines the centres of both a radiation field and a tungsten ball for each image. Based on the geometric differences between those centres, the optimum three-dimensional shift of a tungsten ball is calculated in order to minimise the misalignment error between a target simulator and a radiation isocentre. A decision can then be made whether or not the tungsten ball and lasers intersection point should be corrected. The accuracy and precision of the procedure has been tested and found to be 0.04 and 0.24 mm respectively at 95% confidence interval. The procedure is also quicker, easier and more reliable to perform compared to the previous method based on irradiating a radiographic film.