Search

Non–small cell lung cancer; Brain metastases; Somatic mutations Càncer de pulmó de cèl·lules no petites; Metàstasis cerebrals; Mutacions somàtiques Cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas; Metástasis cerebrales; Mutaciones somáticas Introduction In the phase 3 CheckMate 9LA study, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy prolonged overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy alone. We report updated efficacy and safety (≥3 y of follow-up), clinical outcomes in patients with baseline brain metastases, and exploratory somatic mutation analyses. Methods Adults with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC, no known sensitizing EGFR or ALK alterations, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1 were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks with chemotherapy (two cycles) or chemotherapy alone (four cycles). Assessments included OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate. Exploratory analyses included systemic and intracranial efficacy in patients with or without baseline brain metastases, in addition to OS and PFS by KRAS, TP53, STK11, and KEAP1 somatic mutation status in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. Results With a minimum follow-up of 36.1 months, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy continued to prolong OS versus chemotherapy alone in the intent-to-treat population (median [hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval] OS: 15.8 versus 11.0 mo [0.74; 0.62–0.87]; 3-y OS: 27% versus 19%). Efficacy outcomes were improved in patients with pretreated baseline brain metastases (median [hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval] OS: 19.3 versus 6.8 mo [0.45; 0.29–0.70]; systemic PFS: 9.7 versus 4.1 mo [0.44; 0.28–0.69]; intracranial PFS: 11.4 versus 4.6 mo [0.42; 0.26–0.68]). A trend of OS benefit was observed in patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, despite KRAS, TP53, and STK11 tumor mutations. Extended follow-up revealed no new safety signals. Conclusions With a 3-year minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus ipilimumab with two cycles of chemotherapy continued to have long-term, durable efficacy versus chemotherapy alone; a manageable safety profile; and survival benefit in patients with or without baseline brain metastases or select somatic mutations, further supporting the regimen as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC. This study was supported by Bristol Myers Squibb (Princeton, NJ).

Background and objectives : We have previously showed that for patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) progressing after bevacizumab plus chemotherapy, bevacizumab continuation plus a switch of chemotherapy is the most appropriate option (PRODIGE 18 phase II study). Here we aimed to determine treatment impact in patient's Health-Related Quality Of Life (HRQoL) in PRODIGE18 study. Methods : HRQoL was evaluated in two arms bevacizumab or cetuximab – combined with chemotherapy (modified FOLFOX6 [mFOLFOX6] or FOLFIRI) using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 at baseline, first and third tumour evaluation and at the end of the study. The temporal evolution of quality of life scores was investigated using longitudinal linear mixed models of variance. The time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the long-rank test. A univariate Cox model was used to calculate HR with 95% CI. A multivariate Cox model was applied to determine association of TUDD with age and gender. Safety was assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Results : HRQoL QLQ-C30 questionnaire compliance was high at baseline (>90%) and declined over time (∼ 70% in tumour evaluation 1 and ∼ 60% in tumour evaluation 3), but remained similar in both treatment arms. Patient reported mean diarrhoea QLQ-C30 score is significantly higher in bevacizumab treatment arm. Clinician reported mild diarrhoea was more frequently declared in bevacizumab treatment arm. Cox multivariate analyses showed no statistically significant differences in TUDD for all QLQ-C30 scales between treatments. TUDD of appetite loss was significantly associated to age. Conclusions : Our study shows that no relevant impairment of patients HRQoL between the two treatment arms. So, the analysis of the HRQoL with equal effectiveness does not make it possible to favor one treatment over another. ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT01442649; Clinicaltrialsregister.eu EUDRACT 2009-012942-22.

Supplementary figures and table described in the manuscript

Purpose:Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been suggested as a major prognostic factor in resected stage-III colon cancer. We analyzed ctDNA of patients randomized in the phase III IDEA-France trial.Experimental Design:ctDNA was tested for WIF1 and NPY by droplet digital PCR with method developed and validated for colorectal cancer. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed via multivariable analysis in patients with ctDNA samples and in sub-groups according to treatment duration (3/6 months) and disease stage (high/low-risk stage III).Results:Of 2,010 randomized patients, 1,345 had available ctDNA samples (1,017 collected both post-surgery and pre-chemotherapy). More Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 (78% versus 69%) and T4 and/or N2 (40% versus 36%) were observed in patients studied (n = 1017) versus not analyzed (n = 993). There were 877 ctDNA-negative (86.2%) and 140 ctDNA-positive (13.8%) patients; their baseline characteristics were similar. With a median follow-up of 6.6 years, the 3-year DFS rate was 66.39% for ctDNA-positive patients and 76.71% for ctDNA-negative patients (P = 0.015). ctDNA was confirmed as an independent prognostic marker for DFS (adjusted HR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.13–2.12, P = 0.006) and OS (HR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.12–2.43, P = 0.011). ctDNA was prognostic in patients treated for 3 months and with T4 and/or N2 tumors, but not in those treated for 6 months and with T1–3/N1 tumors.Conclusions:In this first ctDNA assessment of a large series of patients with stage III colon cancer enrolled in phase III trial, post-surgery ctDNA was found in 13.8% of them and was confirmed as an independent prognostic marker.See related commentary by Bent and Kopetz, p. 5449

Supplementary Data

PDF file - 49K

Supplementary Figure Legend from Human TH17 Immune Cells Specific for the Tumor Antigen MAGE-A3 Convert to IFN-γ–Secreting Cells as They Differentiate into Effector T Cells In Vivo

PDF file - 42K

PDF file - 49K

PDF file - 212K

Background: This study examined patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who received long-term avelumab (anti-PD-L1) in a large phase Ib trial (JAVELIN Solid Tumor). Methods: Patients receiving >2 years of avelumab were reviewed and exploratory descriptive analyses were conducted. Results: Individuals with varying baseline characteristics who had received up to 6 years of avelumab were reviewed. Overall, 37/340 (10.9%) had received ≥2 years of treatment; in this subgroup, best response was complete response in 5.4%, partial response in 59.5% and stable disease in 29.7%; 51.4% had continued treatment beyond disease progression. Conclusions: In this study, 11% of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer received ≥2 years of avelumab treatment and experienced prolonged response or continued clinical benefit. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02395172 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )

Afatinib; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Pembrolizumab Afatinib; Carcinoma de células escamosas; Pembrolizumab Afatinib; Carcinoma de cèl·lules escamoses; Pembrolizumab Introduction Afatinib and pembrolizumab have separately shown survival benefit in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) of the lung, and there is biological rationale for concurrent inhibition of the programmed death ligand-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathways in this patient population. Materials and Methods This open-label, single-arm study enrolled patients with SqCC of the lung who had progressed during/after first-line chemotherapy and comprised two parts: a safety run-in to establish the recommended phase II dose (RP2D; afatinib 40 mg or 30 mg once daily with pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks); and the main part assessing efficacy and safety of the RP2D. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included the RP2D, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Twenty-four patients were treated in the safety run-in (afatinib 40 mg/30 mg cohorts: n = 12/12). Median age was 63.5 years; 79.2% of patients were male. All patients discontinued afatinib and pembrolizumab, most commonly due to disease progression (58.3% and 75.0%, respectively) or adverse events (AEs; 37.5% and 25.0%, respectively). The study was discontinued early after completion of the safety run-in, and no patients entered the main part. ORR was 12.5%; median PFS and OS were 13.1 and 29.3 weeks, respectively. All patients had ≥ 1 drug-related AE (grade ≥ 3: 45.8%). Conclusion While there were no new or unexpected safety findings, exploratory analysis of antitumor activity indicated limited efficacy with afatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with SqCC of the lung who had progressed during/after first-line chemotherapy. This work was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. Both study sponsors participated in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, writing this article, and the decision to submit the article for publication.

Few studies have explored the association between baseline characteristics and the occurrence of early toxicities in patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Individual patient data of 2190 patients enrolled in 10 prospective FFCD (Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive) trials were analysed. Severe early toxicity was defined as the occurrence of grade ≥III toxicity within 3 months after initiation of chemotherapy (ET3).Patients received monotherapy based on 5-FU (n = 1068), a cytotoxic doublet (n = 395) or tritherapy with a cytotoxic doublet plus anti-VEGF agent or a cytotoxic triplet (n = 727). The patients received 5-FU (100%), Irinotecan (39.6%), Oxaliplatin (13.4%), Bevacizumab (29.6%) or Aflibercept (1.8%). ET3 occurred in 244 patients (22.8%) with monotherapy, 248 patients (62.8%) with doublet and 392 patients (53.9%) with tritherapy. The most frequent ET3s were related to biological abnormalities and/or gastrointestinal, general and vascular disorders. The prognostic factors for the occurrence of an ET3 in multivariate analysis were a performance status of 2 rather than 0-1 (OR 2.57; 95% CI [1.16, 5.73]; p = 0.02), tritherapy versus monotherapy (OR 2.31; 95% CI [0.84, 6.33]; p = 0.02), alkaline phosphatase 300 UI/l (OR 3.07; 95% CI [1.79, 5.27]; p 0.001) and non-resected primary tumour versus resection (OR 1.59; 95% CI [1.06, 2.39]; p = 0.02). Median overall survival in patients without ET3 was significantly longer than that in patients with ET3 (HR 0.87; 95% CI [0.80-0.96]; p = 0.004).ET3 is frequent whatever the treatment regimen and is associated with certain baseline characteristics. The clinical impact of ET3 on prognosis in mCRC warrants further investigation.

Introduction Brain metastases (BMs) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are rare (≈2%) but are increasing with the improvement of CRC prognosis. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors of BM from CRC. Materials and methods This multicenter retrospective study included all consecutive patients with BM from CRC diagnosed between 2000 and 2017. Theory/calculation Prognostic factors of OS were evaluated in univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate analyses (Cox regression model). These prognostic factors could help the management of patients with BM from CRC. Results A total of 358 patients were included with a median age of 65.5 years. Primary tumors were mostly located in the rectum (42.4%) or left colon (37.2%) and frequently KRAS-mutated (56.9%). The median time from metastatic CRC diagnosis to BM diagnosis was 18.5 ± 2.5 months. BMs were predominantly single (56.9%) and only supratentorial (54.4%). BM resection was performed in 33.0% of the cases and 73.2% of patients had brain radiotherapy alone or after surgery. Median OS was 5.1 ± 0.3 months. In multivariate analysis, age under 65 years, ECOG performance status 0–1, single BM and less than 3 chemotherapy lines before BM diagnosis were associated with better OS. Prognostic scores, i.e. recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA), Disease Specific-Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA), Gastro-Intestinal-Graded Prognostic Assessment (GI-GPA) and the nomogram were statistically significantly associated with OS but the most relevant prognosis criteria seemed the ECOG performance status 0–1. Conclusions ECOG performance status, number of BM and number of chemotherapy lines are the most relevant factors in the management of patients with BM from CRC.

Tumors with microsatellite instability (MSI) represent a paradigm for the success of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based immunotherapy, particularly in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). To date however, tools for predicting efficacy of these new therapies are lacking. Here we combined high-throughput DNA and RNA sequencing of tumors from 117 patients with MSI mCRC treated with anti-PD-1 +/- anti-CTLA-4 and enrolled into two cohorts, i.e., the NIPICOL clinical trial (NCT03350126) and the ImmunoMSI prospective cohort that were used as discovery and validation cohorts in this ancillary study, respectively. All analyses based on previously suggested DNA/RNA biomarkers of resistance failed to identify robust predictors of treatment response in patients, e.g., the level of MSI, mutational burden, the presence of specific somatic DNA variants as assessed by exome-sequencing and the activity of canonical signaling pathways or the presence of specific cellular contingents within the tumor bulk as estimated by RNA-sequencing. By contrast, resistance to ICI was found to depend both on a small subset of somatic DNA variants located in microsatellite-containing genes with very diverse biological functions and the expression of a stromal-oriented RNA component. Testing of these predictors in 5 large additional independent retrospective and prospective cohorts (IDEA and MOSAIC clinical trials) regrouping 446 patients with nonmetastatic or metastatic MSI CRC untreated with ICI allowed us to validate the specificity of the predictive nature of these indicators regarding ICI-treated MSI mCRC patients. The use of these DNA/RNA predictors will help to refine the ICI-based precision therapy of patients with metastatic MSI mCRC.

Despite curative-intent treatment, most patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer will experience disease recurrence or locoregional progression, highlighting the need for new therapies. Current guidelines recommend definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients ineligible for surgical resection, but survival outcomes are poor. Pembrolizumab is well tolerated and provides promising antitumor activity in patients with previously treated, advanced, unresectable esophageal/esophagogastric junction cancer. Combining pembrolizumab with chemoradiotherapy may further improve outcomes in the first-line setting. Here, we describe the design and rationale for the double-blind, Phase III, placebo-controlled, randomized KEYNOTE-975 trial investigating pembrolizumab in combination with definitive chemoradiotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced, unresectable esophageal/gastroesophageal junction cancer. Overall survival and event-free survival are the dual primary end points. Clinical trial registration: NCT04210115 (ClinicalTrials.gov)

TPS487 Background: Immunotherapy has improved clinical outcomes in esophageal carcinoma; however, patients with advanced esophageal cancer that progresses after first-line chemo continue to have limited treatment options and poor prognosis. KEYMAKER-U06 substudy 06A (NCT05342636) is evaluating pembro (anti–PD-1) + investigator choice of chemo (irinotecan or paclitaxel), MK-4280A, a coformulation of pembro and favezelimab (anti-LAG3) + chemo, pembro + MK-4830 (anti-ILT4) + chemo, and pembro + MK-4830 + lenvatinib (multitargeted RTK inhibitor) for the second-line treatment of patients with PD-1/L1 treatment-naive advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: KEYMAKER-U06 substudy 06A is a phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label study comprising a safety lead-in phase and an efficacy phase. Adults with histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or locally advanced ESCC, who experienced disease progression on 1 prior line of therapy, have not received anti-PD-1/L1 therapy, any immune-modulating therapy, and/or VEGF targeted therapy, have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 confirmed by blinded independent central review (BICR), and have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 are eligible. Patients are being allocated to 1 of 4 treatment arms: pembro 200 mg IV Q3W + investigator choice of chemo (paclitaxel 80-100 mg/m2 IV days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle or irinotecan 180 mg/m2 day 1 of every 14-day cycle) (arm 1), MK-4280A (pembro 200 mg/favezelimab 800 mg IV day 1 then Q3W) + investigator choice of chemo (arm 2), pembro 200 mg IV Q3W + MK-4830 800 mg IV Q3W + investigator choice of chemo (arm 3), or pembro 200 mg IV Q3W + MK-4830 800 mg IV Q3W + lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily (arm 4). Arms 2-4 will have a safety lead-in phase; arm 1 will not have a safety lead-in phase because the safety and tolerability of pembro + chemo has been established in multiple phase 3 studies in the first-line treatment setting. The safety lead-in phase includes 10 patients who will be closely monitored for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) for 21 days after the first dose of study intervention. If ≥4 patients experience DLTs in any treatment arm, then enrollment in the efficacy phase may be delayed to allow for examination of safety data and to consider design changes. If ≤3 patients experience DLTs, up to 30 patients per arm will be enrolled (inclusive of the 10 patients from the safety lead-in) for efficacy assessment. In the safety lead-in phase, the primary end point is safety/tolerability assessed by DLTs, adverse events (AEs), and discontinuation of treatment due to AEs. In the efficacy phase, the primary end point is ORR per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, and secondary end points are PFS and DOR, per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, and OS and safety/tolerability. Enrollment in this study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05342636 .

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most efficient models for precision medicine in oncology. The most appropriate therapeutic for the patient is chosen according to the molecular characteristics of the tumor, schematically distributed between immunogenicity and oncogenic addiction. For this last concept, advanced NSCLC with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is one of the most illustrative models. EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the therapeutic backbone for this type of tumor. The recent development of a third-generation TKI, osimertinib, has been a new step forward in the treatment of NSCLC patients. In this article, we first review the clinical development of osimertinib and highlight its efficacy results. We then present the most frequent tumor escape mechanisms when osimertinib is prescribed in first line: off-target (MET amplification, HER2 amplification, BRAF mutation, gene fusions, histologic transformation) and on-target mechanisms (EGFR mutation). Finally, we discuss subsequent biomarker-driven treatment strategies.

PURPOSE HER2 exon 20 insertions and point mutations are oncogenic drivers found in 1%-2% of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No targeted therapy is approved for this subset of patients. We prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of the combination of two antibodies against human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2 [HER2] trastuzumab and pertuzumab with docetaxel; trastuzumab and pertuzumab) and docetaxel. METHODS The IFCT 1703-R2D2 trial is a multicenter, nonrandomized phase II study. Patients with HER2-mutated, advanced NSCLC who progressed after ≥ 1 platinum-based treatment were enrolled. Patients received pertuzumab at a loading dose of 840 mg and 420 mg thereafter; trastuzumab at an 8 mg/kg loading dose and 6 mg/kg thereafter; and docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). Other end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety ( NCT03845270 ). RESULTS Forty-five patients were enrolled and treated. The median age was 64.5 years (range, 31-84 years), 35% were smokers, 72% were females, 15% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, and 30% had brain metastases. The objective response rate was 29% (n = 13), and 58% had stable disease (n = 26). The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 8.5). The median duration of response in patients with a confirmed response (n = 13) was 11 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 14.9). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 64% of the patients. No patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (33%), diarrhea (13%), and anemia (9%). CONCLUSION Triple therapy with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel is feasible and effective for HER2-mutated pretreated advanced NSCLC. These results highlight the effectiveness of the HER2 antibody-based strategy, which should be considered for these patients.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the proton beam matching for a multi-room ProteusPLUS pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy system and quantify the agreement among three beam-matched treatment rooms (GTR1, GTR2, and GTR3). In-air spot size measurements were acquired using a 2D scintillation detector at various gantry angles. Range and absolute dose measurements were performed in water at gantry angle 0°. Patient-specific quality assurance (QA) plans of four different disease sites (brain, mediastinum, sacrum, and prostate) and machine QA fields with uniform dose were delivered for various beam conditions. The results from GTR1 were considered as reference values. The average difference in spot sizes between GTR2 and GTR1 was − 0.3% ± 2.2% (range, − 5.9 to 5.8%). For GTR3 vs. GTR1, the average difference in spot sizes was 0.6% ± 1.7% (range, − 4.8 to 4.6%). The spot symmetry was found to be ≤ 4.4%. For proton range, the difference among three rooms was within ± 0.5 mm. On average, the difference in absolute dose was − 0.1 ± 0.7% (range, − 1.3 to 2.1%) for GTR2 vs. GTR1 and 0.7 ± 0.6% (range, − 0.1 to 2.1%) for GTR3 vs. GTR1. The average gamma passing rate of patient-specific QA measurements (n = 29) was ≥ 98.6%. The average gamma passing rate of machine QA fields was 99.9%. In conclusion, proton beam matching was quantified for three beam-matched rooms of an IBA ProteusPLUS system with a PBS dedicated nozzle. It is feasible to match the spot size and absolute dose within ± 5% and ± 2%, respectively. Proton range can be matched within ± 0.5 mm.

Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the magnetic field regulation in conjunction with the volumetric repainting technique on the spot positions and range in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Methods “Field regulation” — a feature to reduce the switching time between layers by applying a magnetic field setpoint (instead of a current setpoint) has been implemented on the proton beam delivery system at the Miami Cancer Institute. To investigate the impact of field regulation for the volumetric repainting technique, several spot maps were generated with beam delivery sequence in both directions, that is, irradiating from the deepest layer to the most proximal layer (“down” direction) as well as irradiating from the most proximal layer to the deepest layer (“up” direction). Range measurements were performed using a multi‐layer ionization chamber array. Spot positions were measured using two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional scintillation detectors. For range and central‐axis spot position, spot maps were delivered for energies ranging from 70–225 MeV. For off‐axis spot positions, the maps were delivered for high‐, medium, and low‐energies at eight different gantry angles. The results were then compared between the “up” and “down” directions. Results The average difference in range for given energy between “up” and “down” directions was 0.0 ± 0.1 mm. The off‐axis spot position results showed that 846/864 of the spots were within ±1 mm, and all off‐axis spot positions were within ±1.2 mm. For spots (n = 126) at the isocenter, the evaluation between “up” and “down” directions for given energy showed the spot position difference within ±0.25 mm. At the nozzle entrance, the average differences in X and Y positions for given energy were 0.0 ± 0.2 mm and −0.0 ± 0.4 mm, respectively. At the nozzle exit, the average differences in X and Y positions for given energy were 0.0 ± 0.1 mm and −0.1 ± 0.1 mm, respectively. Conclusion The volumetric repainting technique in magnetic field regulation mode resulted in acceptable spot position and range differences for our beam delivery system. The range differences were found to be within ±1 mm (TG224). For the spot positions (TG224: ±1 mm), the central axis measurements were within ±1 mm, whereas for the off‐axis measurements, 97.9% of the spots were within ±1 mm, and all spots were within ±1.2 mm.

International audience

Objectives Efficacy and safety of necitumumab when combined with pembrolizumab was assessed in patients with Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) of squamous and nonsquamous histology, who had progressed after treatment with a platinum-based doublet. Materials and methods This single-arm, multicenter, phase Ib study had a dose-finding phase, in which escalating doses of necitumumab (600 mg and 800 mg IV) were administered on Day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (Q3W) in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg IV) on Day 1 Q3W, and expansion cohorts. Patients were treated until progressive disease (PD), toxicity requiring cessation, protocol noncompliance, or withdrawal of consent. Efficacy was evaluated by overall response rate (ORR). Results In 64 treated patients (32 patients [50 %] were programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1] negative), confirmed ORR was 23.4 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 13.8 %–35.7 %). Two patients (3.1 %) had complete response (CR), 13 patients (20.3 %) had partial response (PR), 26 patients (40.6 %) had stable disease, 17 patients (26.6 %) had PD, and 6 patients (9.4 %) were not evaluable. Regardless of histology or PD-L1 status, median PFS (mPFS) was 4.1 months (95 % CI 2.4–6.9 months) and OS at 6 months was 74.7 % (61.5%–83.9%). Confirmed disease control rate was 64.1 % (95 % CI 51.5–75.7). Patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥1% had numerically improved ORR and median progression-free survival when compared with patients with PD-L1 negative cancer. No dose-limiting toxicities were recorded and the combination of necitumumab 800 mg with pembrolizumab 200 mg was considered tolerable. Conclusion Results suggest modest benefits of second-line necitumumab and pembrolizumab combination therapy in patients with Stage IV NSCLC. Safety profiles were consistent with class effects typical of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and immunotherapies with no additive toxicities.

Background Identifying patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who will have an early disease progression during induction chemotherapy (IC) and identifying patients who may have a chemotherapy-free interval (CFI) after IC are two major challenges. Methods A logistic model was used to identify factors associated with early progression during IC and with short duration of the first CFI in 488 patients enrolled in the PRODIGE 9 trial. Independent factors were defined with a threshold 0.10. Results In multivariate analysis, baseline leukocytes >10 × 109/L (OR = 1.98 [1.02–3.8], p = 0.04), and stable or increasing CEA at 2 months (OR = 3.61 [1.68–7.75], p = 0.01) were independent factors associated with progression during IC. Male gender (OR = 1.725 [0.92–3.325], p = 0.09) and no tumour response at first evaluation (OR = 1.90 [0.96–3.76], p = 0.07) were significantly associated with a short CFI. The presence of BRAF V600E mutation was also associated with short CFI (OR = 4.59 [0.95; 22.3], p = 0.058). Conclusion High baseline leukocyte count and the lack of CEA decrease level at first evaluation were associated with early progression, and could be in favour of early chemotherapy intensification. Male gender, no tumour response at first evaluation and BRAF mutation are associated with a short CFI, and may be considered for maintenance chemotherapy after IC. Clinical trial number NCT00952029.

Alignment between the radiation isocenter and imaging isocenter is critical to ensure accurate proton dose deposition in the patient. The purpose of the current study is to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the coincidence (planar kV X-rays vs. pencil proton beam) among three, beam-matched pencil beam scanning (PBS) gantries of a ProteusPLUS proton therapy system. For proton radiation isocenter measurement, a cone-shaped scintillator detector, XRV-124, was utilized. To test the impact of gantry angle on the beam coincidence, measurements at 12 different gantry angles were performed in the study. Additionally, the energy dependency on beam coincidence was investigated by acquiring measurements for a total of 63 different energies ranging from 70─225 MeV at increments of 2.5 MeV. The measurements were performed in all three beam-matched gantries (GTR1, GTR2, and GTR3). A correction of ≤ 0.3 mm was applied in the imaging system to account for the imaging isocenter shift as the gantry rotates from 0° to 330°. The beam coincidences in X, Y, and Z were within ± 1.0 mm for 63 different energies at 12 different gantry angles in all three beam-matched gantries. The beam coincidence results among three gantries (GTR1, GTR2, and GTR3) ranged from − 0.9 to 0.7 mm in the lateral (X), − 0.8 to 0.5 mm in the longitudinal (Y), and − 0.7 to 0.7 mm in the vertical (Z) directions. Overall, the mean isofocus of radiation isocenter was 0.4 ± 0.2 mm in GTR1, 0.5 ± 0.2 mm in GTR2, and 0.4 ± 0.2 mm in GTR3. Given the consistent agreement (

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to evaluate the safety of two regorafenib dose-escalation approaches in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.Patients and methods: Patients with mCRC and progression during or within 3 months following their last standard chemotherapy regimen were randomised to receive the approved dose of regorafenib of 160 mg QD (arm A) or 120 mg QD (arm B) administered as 3 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week off, or 160 mg QD 1 week on/1 week off (arm C). The primary end-point was the percentage of patients with G3/G4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in each arm.Results: There were 299 patients randomly assigned to arm A (n = 101), arm B (n = 99), or arm C (n = 99); 297 initiated treatments (arm A n = 100, arm B n = 98, arm C n = 99: pop-ulation for safety analyses). G3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 60%, 55%, and 54% of patients in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The most common G3/4 AEs were hypertension (19, 12, and 20 patients), fatigue (20, 14, and 15 patients), hypokalemia (11, 7, and 10 pa-tients), and hand-foot skin reaction (8, 7, and 3 patients). Median overall survival was 7.4 (IQR 4.0-13.7) months in arm A, 8.6 (IQR 3.8-13.4) in arm B, and 7.1 (IQR 4.4-12.4) in arm C.Conclusions: The alternative regorafenib dosing schedules were feasible and safe in patients with mCRC who had been previously treated with standard therapy. There was a higher nu-merical improvement on the most clinically relevant AEs in the intermittent dosing arm, particularly during the relevant first two cycles. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02835924.(C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).