Search

We present the sequence of a contiguous 2.63 Mb of DNA extending from the tip of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Within this sequence, we predict 277 protein coding genes, of which 94 had been sequenced already in the course of studying the biology of their gene products, and examples of 12 different transposable elements. We show that an interval between bands 3A2 and 3C2, believed in the 1970s to show a correlation between the number of bands on the polytene chromosomes and the 20 genes identified by conventional genetics, is predicted to contain 45 genes from its DNA sequence. We have determined the insertion sites of P-elements from 111 mutant lines, about half of which are in a position likely to affect the expression of novel predicted genes, thus representing a resource for subsequent functional genomic analysis. We compare the European Drosophila Genome Project sequence with the corresponding part of the independently assembled and annotated Joint Sequence determined through "shotgun" sequencing. Discounting differences in the distribution of known transposable elements between the strains sequenced in the two projects, we detected three major sequence differences, two of which are probably explained by errors in assembly; the origin of the third major difference is unclear. In addition there are eight sequence gaps within the Joint Sequence. At least six of these eight gaps are likely to be sites of transposable elements; the other two are complex. Of the 275 genes in common to both projects, 60% are identical within 1% of their predicted amino-acid sequence and 31% show minor differences such as in choice of translation initiation or termination codons; the remaining 9% show major differences in interpretation.

The stereotyped pattern of veins in the Drosophila wing is generated in response to local EGF signalling. Mutations in the rhomboid (rho) gene, which encodes a sevenpass membrane protein required to enhance signalling transmitted by the EGF receptor (Egfr), inhibit vein development and disrupt the vein pattern. By contrast, net mutations produce ectopic veins in intervein regions. We have cloned the net gene and show that it encodes a basic HLH protein that probably acts as a transcriptional repressor. net and rho are expressed in mutually exclusive patterns during the development of the wing imaginal disc. Lack of net activity causes rho expression to expand, and vice versa. Furthermore, ectopic expression of net or rho results in their mutual repression and thus suppresses vein formation or generates tube-like wings composed of vein-like tissue. Egfr signalling and net exert mutually antagonising activities during the specification of vein versus intervein fate. While Egfr signalling represses net transcription, net exhibits a two-tiered control by repressing rho transcription and interfering with Egfr signalling downstream of Rho. Our results further suggest that net is required to maintain intervein development by restricting Egfr signalling, which promotes vein development, to the Net-free vein regions of the wing disc.

The large Balbiani rings of the chironomids produce giant internally repeated transcripts that are translated into silk‐like proteins used for protective tubes. We have cloned fragments of the Balbiani ring 2 (BR2) gene of Chironomus pallidivittatus, normally the most prominent BR, for sequencing and restriction analysis. The results indicate a basic, tandemly arranged repeat unit of 198 bp, consisting of an invariant region of 102 bp followed by a variable region of 96 bp, the latter containing short internal tandem repeats. In the coding strand of both regions, there is a tendency to maximize adenine (˜40%) and minimize cytosine + thymidine (32‐33%). Stringency in codon usage and absence of preference for third position nucleotide substitutions between homologous sequences suggest selection at the nucleotide level to be important. Both regions code for peptides rich in basic amino acids, but show distinct differences in other coding properties. The invariant region probably codes for a crystalline domain, and the variable region for a proline‐rich, amorphous domain. One of the clones includes the 3′ end of the translated region. Surrounding and following two stop codons is a sequence of four short palindromes. Furthermore, the first stop codon is part of a sequence reminiscent of a “TATA box”. The possibilities are discussed that this area of the gene might be a target for regulatory molecules controlling translation termination and/or the expression of an overlapping cistron.

The putative finger domain of knirps (kni), a member of the gap class of segmentation genes, was used to isolate two sequence‐related genes of Drosophila melanogaster under reduced stringency hybridization conditions. The two kni homologous genes map close to kni in the proximal portion of the third chromosome. One of them is the previously identified gene knirps‐related (knrl), kni and knrl are spatially co‐regulated in both early and late stages of embryogenesis. Their posterior domains of expression at blastoderm stage are under the control of the maternal pattern organizer gene nanos. In contrast, the expression of the second kni homologous gene is restricted to the late embryonic gonads. Due to its site of expression, we termed this gene ‘embryonic gonad’ (egon). In addition to the conserved DNA‐binding domain, these three genes share an additional sequence of 19 amino acids, the kni‐box, adjacent to the finger region. The identical N‐terminal Cys/Cys finger encoded by each of the three genes suggests that they code for DNA‐binding proteins which might bind to similar (or even identical) target sequences.

The Drosophila gap gene hunchback (hb) is required for the establishment of the anterior segment pattern of the embryo, and also for a small region of the posterior segment pattern. The hb gene encodes two transcripts from two promoters which show a differential regulation, although they code for the same protein product. The 3.2‐kb transcript is expressed during oogenesis and forms an anterior‐posterior gradient during the early stages of development. The first zygotic expression of hb during cleavage stages 11‐12 is due to the 2.9‐kb transcript. Its expression is under the control of the anterior pattern organizer gene bicoid (bcd) and it appears to be necessary and sufficient for the anterior segmentation. The 3.2‐kb transcript is expressed again at syncytial blastoderm stage in the anterior yolk nuclei, as well as in an anterior stripe which is posteriorly adjacent to the domain of the 2.9‐kb transcript, and as a posterior stripe. Using hb‐promoter/lacZ fusion gene constructs in combination with germ line transformation, we have delimited a regulatory region for the 2.9‐kb transcript to approximately 300 bp upstream of the site of transcription initiation and show that this region is sufficient to confer the full regulation by bcd.

During the development of the central nervous system, Drosophila embryo axons become organized in a stereo‐typed fasciculation pattern. We have found that the zipper (zip) gene, initially identified on the basis of a defective larval cuticle in zip mutant embryos, is possibly involved in the establishment or maintenance of the axon pattern during the late stages of neurogenesis. The zip wild‐type gene is expressed in the developing nervous system. It codes for a putative integral membrane protein. Both the molecular features of zipper and its biological effect in the nervous system of mutants suggest that zipper is an essential component for cell surface interactions involved in axon patterning, and that the cuticle phenotype of zip mutants is dependent on the primary defects observed in the nervous system.

Insect embryos have been classified as intermediate- and short-germ embryos, in which posterior segments are thought to be generated sequentially from an uncommitted growth zone, or as long-term embryos, such as Drosophila melanogaster, which develop primordia for all segments simultaneously. In Drosophila the coordinated activities among a three-tiered cascade of zygotic segmentation genes subdivide the embryo into progressively smaller units along the anterior-posterior axis. The mode of pattern specification in lepidopteran embryos has not been determined, although on morphological grounds they have been characterized as intermediate-germ insects. We have cloned orthologues of Drosophila segmentation genes from the tobacco hawkmoth Manduca sexta and have found that the blastoderm expression patterns of these genes show a molecular prepatterning typical of Drosophila. Thus, successive segment formation in Manduca embryos may not be due to sequential addition but rather may be the consequence of a lateral compression of the embryo proceeding in an anterior-to-posterior progression. These data challenge the view that the classification of insect development according to morphological criteria can serve as a reliable indicator of the molecular mechanisms underlying segmentation.

The gut-innervating stomatogastric nervous system of Drosophila, unlike the central and the peripheral nervous system, derives from a compact, single layered epithelial anlage. Here we report how this anlage is initially defined during embryogenesis by the expression of proneural genes of the achaete-scute complex in response to the maternal terminal pattern forming system. Within the stomatogastric nervous system anlage, the wingless-dependent intercellular communication system adjusts the cellular range of Notch-dependent lateral inhibition to single-out three achaete-expressing cells. Those cells define distinct invagination centers which orchestrate the behavior of neighboring cells to form epithelial infoldings, each headed by an achaete-expressing tip cell. Our results suggest that the wingless pathway acts not as an instructive signal, but as a permissive factor which coordinates the spatial activity of morphoregulatory signals within the stomatogastric nervous system anlage.

The Drosophila gap-like segmentation genes orthodenticle, empty spiracles and buttonhead (btd) are expressed and required in overlapping domains in the head region of the blastoderm stage embryo. Their expression domains correspond to two or three segment anlagen that fail to develop in each mutant. It has been proposed that these overlapping expression domains mediate head metamerization and could generate a combinatorial code to specify segment identity. To test this model, we developed a system for targeted gene expression in the early embryo, based on region specific promoters and the flp-out system. Misexpression of btd in the anterior half of the blastoderm embryo directed by the hunchback proximal promoter rescues the btd mutant head phenotype to wild-type. This indicates that, while btd activity is required for the formation of specific head segments, its ectopic expression does not disturb head development. We conclude that the spatial limits of btd expression are not instructive for metamerization of the head region and that btd activity does not contribute to a combinatorial code for specification of segment identity.

The Drosophila larval optic nerve, called Bolwig's nerve (BN), projects into the central brain along a simple invariant path. The growth of the BN proceeds in three phases, during which the nerve changes direction at two intermediate targets, P1 and P2. Here we show that the projection of the BN is amenable to genetic dissection. In a mutagenesis screen, we have isolated mutations in 13 genes that disrupt the BN projection in distinct phases of its development. The mutant phenotypes in combination with the expression patterns of corresponding candidate genes define cellular components necessary for directing the growth of the BN toward P2 and for redirecting its growth at P2, and reveal developmental strategies employed in the establishment of the BN projection.

In embryos of the chironomid midge Smittia, synthesis of a posterior indicator protein designated PI1 (Mr approximately 50,000; pI approximately 5.5) forecasts development of an abdomen as opposed to head and thorax. The protein is synthesized several hours before germ anlage formation. In normal embryos at early blastoderm stages, synthesis of PI1 is restricted to posterior embryonic fragments but not to pole cells. In "double-abdomen" embryos, a mirror-image duplication of the abdomen is formed by cells that would otherwise develop into head and thorax. Embryos were programmed for double-abdomen development by UV irradiation of the anterior pole, and half of them were reprogrammed for normal development by subsequent exposure to visible light (photoreversal). Correspondingly, PI1 was synthesized in anterior fragments of UV-irradiated embryos but not after photoreversal. In a control experiment, UV irradiation of the posterior pole caused neither double-abdomen formation nor PI1 synthesis in anterior fragments. The identity of PI1 formed in anterior fragments of prospective double abdomens with the protein found in posterior fragments was revealed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and limited proteolysis. Suppression of PI1 synthesis in anterior fragments of normal embryos is ascribed to the activity of cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particles thought to act as anterior determinants.

Proteins from small amounts of biological material are separated at high resolution by micro two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Under nonequilibrium conditions, proteins are focused in 10-microliters capillaries and separated on ultrathin slab gels. Our device allows simultaneous focusing of up to 10 samples which can be processed in the second dimension on a single gel. Several hundred protein spots from less than a total of 300 ng of protein are resolved on an area the size of a postage stamp. A single spot containing less than 10 pg of protein or 1 cpm can be detected by silver staining or autoradiography, respectively. Our system allows inexpensive, simultaneous, rapid analysis of proteins when only a limited amount of biological material is available for investigation. A detailed description of the equipment, the methods, and the characteristics of this microanalysis are presented.

In each Malpighian tubule of Drosophila, one cell is singled out, the tip cell, whose function during embryogenesis is to promote cell division in its neighbours. We follow the segregation of this cell, explore the genetic interactions that underlie its specification and demonstrate that tip cell allocation closely resembles neurogenesis. The tip cell arises by division of a tip mother cell, which is selected from a cluster of equivalent cells in each tubule primordium. Each cluster is marked out by the expression of proneural genes and the selection of a single cell from each group involves lateral inhibition, mediated by the neurogenic genes. We confirm the mitogenic role of the tip cell during embryogenesis by mutational analysis and show that it subsequently adopts a second fate, differentiating neural characteristics. We demonstrate that both stages in the differentiation of this cell are established by the same sequence of genetic interactions, which have not previously been shown to occur outside the neurogenic ectoderm.