Search

Building a precise alternative neurotoxicological test is of great importance to respond to societal and ethical requirements. In this study, a new developmental neurotoxicity test (DNT) was established with the human neural progenitor cell line. ReNcell CX cells were exposed to neurotoxic chemicals (aphidicolin, hydroxyurea, cytosine arabinoside, 5-fluorouracil, and ochratoxin A) or non-neurotoxic chemicals (sodium gluconate, sodium bicarbonate, penicillin G, and saccharin). Propidium iodide (PI) was used to evaluate cell viability. BrdU and Ki-76 were employed to determine cell proliferation. Based on the cell viability and proliferation, mathematical models were built by linear discriminant analysis. Furthermore, the neurotoxic-considered chemicals inhibited cell cycle progression at the protein level, supporting the biomolecular rationale for the predictive model. Overall, these results show that the new test method can be used to determine the potential developmental neurotoxicants or new drug candidates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The embryoid body test (EBT) is a developmental toxicity test method that measures the size of embryoid bodies (EBs) and the viability of mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and fibroblasts (3T3 cells). The previous pre-validation study confirmed the high accuracy (above 80%) of EBT using 26 coded test chemicals. This second-phase validation study assessed the inter-laboratory reproducibility (5 chemicals in common) and predictive capacity (10 chemicals in each laboratory) test using the coded test chemicals at three laboratories. For the prediction model, the accuracy is increased when more data is accumulated. Therefore, we updated the prediction model and analyzed the results of the second year with the newly created-prediction model. Statistical analysis of the inter-laboratory reproducibility test results indicated that accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 87%, 78%, and 100%, respectively. The results of the statistical analysis of the predictive capacity test showed an accuracy of 80%, sensitivity of 78%, and specificity of 81%. In conclusion, the EBT can accurately classify various embryotoxicants within a short period and with relatively little effort. Therefore, EBT can be used as a good way to test developmental toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Building a precise alternative neurotoxicological test is of great importance to respond to societal and ethical requirements. In this study, a new developmental neurotoxicity test (DNT) was established with the human neural progenitor cell line. ReNcell CX cells were exposed to neurotoxic chemicals (aphidicolin, hydroxyurea, cytosine arabinoside, 5-fluorouracil, and ochratoxin A) or non-neurotoxic chemicals (sodium gluconate, sodium bicarbonate, penicillin G, and saccharin). Propidium iodide (PI) was used to evaluate cell viability. BrdU and Ki-76 were employed to determine cell proliferation. Based on the cell viability and proliferation, mathematical models were built by linear discriminant analysis. Furthermore, the neurotoxic-considered chemicals inhibited cell cycle progression at the protein level, supporting the biomolecular rationale for the predictive model. Overall, these results show that the new test method can be used to determine the potential developmental neurotoxicants or new drug candidates.