Search

The efficacy of ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, on active and stable lesions was evaluated in patients with active non-segmental vitiligo in a phase 2b trial (NCT03715829). Patients were randomized to placebo or daily ritlecitinib 50 mg (with or without 4-week 100-mg or 200-mg loading dose), 30 mg, or 10 mg for 24 weeks. Active lesions showed greater baseline expression of inflammatory/immune markers IFNG and CCL5, levels of CD103, and T-cell infiltrates than stable lesions. Patients with more active than stable vitiligo lesions showed higher baseline serum levels of CXCL9 and PD-L1, while patients with more stable than active lesions showed higher baseline serum levels of HO-1. At Week 24, ritlecitinib 50 mg significantly stabilized mean percent change from baseline in depigmentation extent in both active lesions and stable lesions vs. placebo-response, with stable lesions showing greater repigmentation. After 24 weeks of treatment, ritlecitinib 50 mg increased expression of melanocyte markers in stable lesions, while Th1/Th2-related and co-stimulatory molecules decreased significantly in both stable and active lesions. Serum from patients with more active than stable lesions showed decreased levels of ICOS and NK cell activation markers. These data, confirmed at transcription/protein levels, indicate that stable lesion repigmentation occurs early with ritlecitinib, while active lesions require stabilization of inflammation first. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03715829.

INTRODUCTION: Upadacitinib (UPA) is a Janus kinase inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy in moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an acceptable safety profile. We investigated laboratory parameter changes in UPA RA clinical trials. METHODS: Pooled data from six randomized trials in the SELECT phase 3 program were included. Key laboratory parameters and safety data were measured for UPA 15 and 30 mg once daily (QD), adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg every other week + methotrexate (MTX), and MTX monotherapy. Exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs) of adverse events were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 3209 patients receiving UPA 15 mg QD (10 782.7 patient-years [PY]), 1204 patients receiving UPA 30 mg QD (3162.5 PY), 579 patients receiving ADA + MTX (1573.2 PY), and 314 patients receiving MTX monotherapy (865.1 PY) were included, representing up to 6.5 years of total exposure. Decreases in mean levels of hemoglobin, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, and increases in mean levels of liver enzymes and creatinine phosphokinase were observed with UPA, with grade 3 or 4 changes observed in some patients. Mean low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratios remained stable for patients receiving UPA 15 mg QD. EAERs of anemia and neutropenia occurred at generally consistent rates between UPA and active comparators (3.1-4.3 and 1.7-5.0 events [E]/100 PY across treatment groups, respectively). Rates of hepatic disorder were higher with MTX monotherapy, UPA 15 mg and UPA 30 mg (10.8, 9.7, and 11.0 E/100 PY, respectively) versus ADA + MTX (6.4 E/100 PY). Rates of lymphopenia were highest with MTX monotherapy (3.2 E/100 PY). Treatment discontinuations due to laboratory-related events were rare, occurring in 1.1% and 2.2% of patients treated with UPA 15 and 30 mg QD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this integrated long-term analysis of laboratory parameters continue to support an acceptable safety profile of UPA 15 mg QD for moderate-to-severe RA.

Introduction: Patients with alopecia areata (AA) may have received several therapies for management of AA during their lives. In the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 (NCT03732807) study, the oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor ritlecitinib demonstrated efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients aged ≥ 12 years with AA and ≥ 50% scalp hair loss. This post hoc analysis investigated associations between prior use of AA therapies and Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) responses in patients receiving ritlecitinib for AA. Methods: Patients receiving ritlecitinib 30 mg or 50 mg once daily with or without an initial 4-week 200-mg daily loading dose were grouped by previous exposure to AA treatments, including topicals, intralesional corticosteroids (ILCS), topical immunotherapy, and systemic immunosuppressants or any prior AA treatment. Multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluated the association between response based on a SALT score of ≤ 20 and any prior treatment for AA at weeks 24 and 48. Results: Of 522 patients, 360 (69.0%) had previous exposure to any AA treatment. At Week 24, SALT ≤ 20 response was positively associated with prior use of ILCS (odds ratio [OR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–3.65; P < 0.05) and negatively associated with prior use of systemic immunosuppressants (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.28–0.88; P < 0.05). Prior use of topicals or topical immunotherapy was not associated with SALT ≤ 20 response at Week 24. By Week 48, no association was identified between SALT ≤ 20 response and prior use of topicals, ILCS, topical immunosuppressants, or systemic immunosuppressants (all P > 0.05). Previous exposure to any AA therapy was not associated with SALT ≤ 20 response at weeks 24 or 48 (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: Prior AA treatment history had no effect on longer-term treatment response to ritlecitinib. Trial Registration Number: NCT03732807. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Behçet's syndrome (BS) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the small and large vessels of the venous and arterial systems and is characterized by recurrent oral and genital ulcers. Uveitis represents the most typical ocular manifestation and completes the triple symptom complex originally described. Recognized treatments for Behçet's uveitis (BU) include systemic glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents. No study has reported on the use of upadacitinib for BS with panuveitis. Herein, we report the use of upadacitinib in two patients with BU suffering from macular edema and persistent inflammation, which was refractory to systemic glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents. Methods: We retrospectively followed-up two cases, including an adolescent girl and a man in his thirties, with a 2- and 10-year history of BS, respectively. Results: Upadacitinib successfully treated BU, leading to improved visual acuity, controlled intraocular inflammation, and the disappearance of macular edema in both patients. The patients in this study were either recalcitrant to or intolerant to conventional therapy and adalimumab. Only the female patient revealed a mildly abnormal blood picture and slight transaminitis after 6 months of upadacitinib administration. However, no serious adverse events were reported in either of the two patients during follow-up. Conclusion: Upadacitinib can be considered an important future option for managing recurrent and recalcitrant cases of BU, especially in those with chronic ocular inflammation and macular edema, which are refractory to conventional therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Upadacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, achieved significantly higher rates of clinical remission and endoscopic response vs placebo during induction (U-EXCEL [NCT03345849], U-EXCEED [NCT03345836]) and maintenance (U-ENDURE [NCT03345823]) treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. Prior biologic failure is often associated with reduced responses to subsequent therapies. This post hoc analysis assessed upadacitinib efficacy by prior biologic failure status. Patients were randomized to placebo or upadacitinib 45 mg (UPA45) for 12 weeks (induction). UPA45 clinical responders were enrolled in U-ENDURE and rerandomized to placebo, upadacitinib 15 mg, or upadacitinib 30 mg (UPA30) for 52 weeks. Assessments were by prior biologic failure. Of 1021 patients, 733 (71.8%) had prior biologic failure. Across outcomes and subgroups, upadacitinib-treated patients achieved higher rates vs placebo. During induction, upadacitinib had higher rates vs placebo for clinical remission based on stool frequency/abdominal pain score (without failure: 54.0% vs 28.3%; with failure: 42.2% vs 14.1%) and endoscopic response (without failure: 52.0% vs 16.2%; with failure: 35.7% vs 5.3%). In maintenance, the greatest treatment effect (upadacitinib vs placebo) was among patients with prior biologic failure treated with UPA30 (clinical remission without failure: 58.5% vs 32.7%; with failure: 42.5% vs 8.7%; endoscopic response without failure: 43.9% vs 17.9%; with failure: 38.9% vs 4.0%). Patients without vs with prior biologic failure had fewer adverse events. Upadacitinib led to higher absolutes rates of clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients without vs with prior biologic failure. Patients treated with upadacitinib achieved greater rates of clinical and endoscopic improvements vs placebo, regardless of prior biologic exposure. ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03345849 , NCT03345836 , NCT03345823. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by bone marrow fibrosis associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The therapeutic landscape for MF has advanced with the development of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) like ruxolitinib (RUX), fedratinib (FED), pacritinib (PAC), and momelotinib (MMB), aiming to alleviate symptoms and enhance patient comfort. Methods: A network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of eleven JAKi treatment regimens across nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 2340 participants. Outcomes were evaluated in terms of spleen volume reduction (SVR), total symptom score reduction (TSSR), hematological safety profiles, and overall survival (OS). Results: RUX and MMB were superior in achieving SVR and TSSR, with significant dose-response relationships observed. PAC and MMB were associated with a decreased risk of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia compared to other JAKis. However, no substantial benefits in OS were observed with newer JAKis compared to RUX. The poorer OS outcomes with certain PAC dosages were likely influenced by baseline patient characteristics, particularly severe cytopenias. Conclusion: The introduction of JAKis significantly changed the treatment of MF. This meta-analysis reaffirms the core role of RUX and positions MMB as a potentially powerful alternative for treating symptoms and reducing spleen size. Meanwhile, MMB and PAC have a positive effect on anemia in MF while FED is more tolerable for patients with thrombocytopenia. However, it should be noted that these results are influenced by baseline patient characteristics, particularly cytopenias, which affects both management and overall survival. Therefore, there is an urgent need for personalized dosing strategies to optimize the balance between efficacy and safety, with careful consideration of patientspecific factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses a case report of a successful treatment of lichen planus pemphigoides (LPP) with tofacitinib, a JAK inhibitor. LPP is a rare condition characterized by pruritic papules, plaques, and bullae on the skin. Previous treatments have shown limited efficacy, so alternative strategies such as JAK inhibitors have been explored. The patient in this case experienced significant improvement with tofacitinib, allowing for a gradual tapering of prednisolone. The article suggests that JAK inhibitors could be a promising treatment option for LPP by targeting the inflammatory processes and suppressing aberrant cytokine production. [Extracted from the article]

Efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib (an oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor) were evaluated in patients with nonsegmental vitiligo (NSV) across Fitzpatrick skin types (FSTs). Patients with FST I‐III ('light skin'; n = 247) and FST IV‐VI ('dark skin'; n = 117) received once‐daily ritlecitinib 50 mg (with/without 4‐week loading dose), low‐dose ritlecitinib or placebo for 24 weeks. At baseline, patients with light skin displayed higher CLM‐1 and NCR1 serum levels than patients with dark skin (p < 0.05). At 24 weeks, ritlecitinib 50 mg improved the extent of depigmentation measured by percent change from baseline in facial‐vitiligo area scoring index (placebo‐adjusted mean difference [90% CI]) in patients with light (−15.2 [−24.7, −5.8]; p = 0.004) and dark (−37.4 [−50.3, −24.4]; p < 0.0001) skin, with continuous re‐pigmentation through week 48. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were similar across FSTs. At weeks 4 and 24, ritlecitinib 50 mg reduced CXCL11 serum levels (p < 0.001) in patients with light skin, whereas patients with dark skin had increased levels at week 4 (p = 0.05) and no significant change at week 24. Ritlecitinib 50 mg decreased IL‐9 and IL‐22 expression levels in dark skin compared with light skin (qPCR; p < 0.05). These differences in immune dysregulations may explain why NSV patients with dark skin respond to therapy earlier than patients with light skin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to examine whether creatine kinase (CK) elevation occurs with interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors, as in Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, which are reported to increase CK levels in rheumatoid arthritis. Patients and methods: A multicenter database of JAK inhibitor and IL-6 inhibitor treatment was retrospectively searched between January 2016 to December 2022; 142 cases (117 females, 25 males, mean age: 63.8±13.0 years; range, 20 to 85 years), with 71 cases in each group, were extracted by propensity score matching using age, sex, body mass index, and CK at 0 weeks. The outlier rate was compared. Patients’ background characteristics related to elevated CK levels at 24 weeks were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Creatine kinase levels at 4 and 12 weeks were significantly higher with JAK inhibitors than with IL-6 inhibitors (four weeks, 72 vs. 87.5 IU/mL, p=0.016; 12 weeks, 71 vs. 95.5 IU/mL, p=0.028). The outlier rate (Grade 1) with JAK inhibitors increased significantly over time (0 weeks, 4.2%; four weeks, 18.1%; 12 weeks, 21.7%; 24 weeks, 18.3%; p=0.015), whereas that with IL-6 inhibitors increased slightly (0 weeks, 5.6%; four weeks, 9.2%; 12 weeks, 8.6%; 24 weeks, 8.5%; p=0.745), with a significant difference between the groups (p=0.035). No patients discontinued treatment due to myalgia or renal dysfunction. The factors significantly positively related to elevated CK levels at 24 weeks were male sex and creatinine. Those significantly negatively related were Steinbrocker stage and class, modified health assessment questionnaire scores, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and glucocorticoid dose. Conclusion: Mild CK elevations with JAK inhibitors are not a particular clinical problem. CK elevation might be specific to JAK inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe alopecia areata (AA) is a nonscarring hair loss for immune disorder and SALT score ≥ 50%. The guidelines for managing patients with severe AA suggest treatments: systemic steroids, JAK inhibitors, and contact immunotherapy. However, there is a lack of evidence indicating the superiority of one treatment over another. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the most effective treatment for severe AA through network meta-analysis. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a network meta-analysis. The literature search was retrieved across four databases. The Cochrane 5.1 risk of bias assessment tool and ROBINS-I tool assessed quality of the included studies. Subsequently, efficacy and safety comparisons among the three treatments were conducted using Stata 14.0 on account of the frequency method. The SUCRA rank indicated that oral dexamethasone (95.9%) > diphenylcyclopropenone(DPCP) (74.5%) > oral ritlecitinib (62.6%) > oral baricitinib (46.9%) > squaric acid dibutyl ester(SADBE) (20.1%) > placebo (0.0%) from high to low in the aspect of improving efficacy. As for safety, placebo(88.4%) > oral ritlecitinib (86.5%) > oral baricitinib (62.1%) > SADBE (37.0%) > oral dexamethasone(22.3%) > DPCP(3.8%) in the aspect of decreasing adverse events. Oral dexamethasone and DPCP showed superior efficacy compared to oral ritlecitinib and oral baricitinib. However, in terms of safety, oral ritlecitinib was preferable. Some adverse events associated with oral dexamethasone and DPCP were intolerable to patients, whereas those related to oral ritlecitinib and oral baricitinib were more manageable. Overall, ritlecitinib and baricitinib remain promising drugs in the future treatment of severe AA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune pathology manifested by loss of hair. Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib and azathioprine in patients with AA and variants. Methods: In this double-blind randomized controlled trail (RCT) carried out at the Department of Dermatology, Medical Teaching Institute-Lady Reading Hospital (MTI-LRH), Peshawar, Pakistan, patients aged ≥ 12 years diagnosed with AA, alopecia totalis (AT) or alopecia universalis (AU) with minimum 50% scalp hair loss for a period ≥ 06 years were included. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oral tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (Group I) or oral azathioprine 2 mg/kg body weight once daily (Group II). The primary endpoint was Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score, evaluated at baseline and 06 months follow-up. Safety was consistently assessed during the study. Results: A total of 104 patients underwent random allocation into either the tofacitinib group (n = 52) or the azathioprine group (n = 52). The mean (SD) age of patients was 20.23 (7.14) years and 22.26 (8.07) years, while the mean (SD) disease duration was 6.59 (4.01) years and 7.98 (4.40) years in in Group I and II, respectively. Overall, 40 (38.5%) patients were adolescents while 70 (67.3%) were male. 52 (50%) had AA, 37 (35.5%) had AT and 15 (14.5%) had AU. Mean baseline SALT score in tofacitinib group was 91.02 ± 10.21 and azathioprine group was 91.02 ± 10.63, which at 06 months follow-up improved to 14.1 ± 24.6 and 63.9 ± 33.9, respectively (difference, 11.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 38.3–61.3, p < 0.0001). Overall, no major adverse effects and no difference among the minor adverse effects in the two groups (04 adverse events for tofacitinib group and 08 for azathioprine group: p = 0.23) was observed. Conclusions: Efficacy of tofacitinib was significantly higher than azathioprine, whilst both drugs were well-tolerated in patients with AA and variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, was well-tolerated and efficacious in the phase 2b VIBRATO study in participants with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis [UC]. The aim of this study was to identify baseline serum and microbiome markers that predict subsequent clinical efficacy and to develop noninvasive serum signatures as potential real-time noninvasive surrogates of clinical efficacy after ritlecitinib. Methods Tissue and peripheral blood proteomics, transcriptomics, and faecal metagenomics were performed on samples before and after 8 weeks of oral ritlecitinib induction therapy [20 mg, 70 mg, 200 mg, or placebo once daily, N  = 39, 41, 33, and 18, respectively]. Linear mixed models were used to identify baseline and longitudinal protein markers associated with efficacy. The combined predictivity of these proteins was evaluated using a logistic model with permuted efficacy data. Differential expression of faecal metagenomics was used to differentiate responders and nonresponders. Results Peripheral blood serum proteomics identified four baseline serum markers [LTA, CCL21, HLA-E, MEGF10] predictive of modified clinical remission [MR], endoscopic improvement [EI], histological remission [HR], and integrative score of tissue molecular improvement. In responders, 37 serum proteins significantly changed at Week 8 compared with baseline [false discovery rate of <0.05]; of these, changes in four [IL4R, TNFRSF4, SPINK4, and LAIR-1] predicted concurrent EI and HR responses. Faecal metagenomics analysis revealed baseline and treatment response signatures that correlated with EI, MR, and tissue molecular improvement. Conclusions Blood and microbiome biomarkers stratify endoscopic, histological, and tissue molecular responses to ritlecitinib, which may help guide future precision medicine approaches to UC treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02958865 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 78-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis, who was started on baricitinib five or six months earlier, was referred to our hospital due to a subcutaneous abscess in her right axilla. Contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvis computed tomography showed subcutaneous abscesses in her right axilla and lymphadenopathy with calcification. Cultures from the subcutaneous abscess and skin biopsy specimens were positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. These findings led to the diagnosis of scrofuloderma associated with tuberculous lymphadenitis. She was started on an antitubercular regimen of isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol as the initial phase treatment (first 2 months), followed by isoniazid and rifampicin for 4 months (total 6 months). After 6 months of antitubercular treatment, the abscesses and lymphadenitis disappeared. Although cases of tuberculosis during JAK inhibitor treatment are rare, they are serious adverse events that require caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune-mediated comorbidities in patients with psoriasiform eczema are common. It can be challenging to manage multiple immune-mediated diseases, especially considering that biologic treatments are prone to causing paradoxical effects. The aim of this retrospective observational case series was to describe the course of both psoriasiform eczema and immune-mediated comorbidities in five patients treated with upadacitinib for psoriasiform dermatitis. Five patients, all male, were included. All the patients suffered from psoriasiform eczema. Moreover, two of the patients suffered from alopecia areata, two from vitiligo, one from ulcerative colitis and one from hidradenitis suppurativa. In all cases, the treatment with upadacitinib was rapidly effective on the eczema. The effectiveness on alopecia areata was good in both cases, while the results on vitiligo were only partial. The only case of ulcerative colitis achieved complete remission, while the case of hidradenitis suppurativa experience partial improvement. In conclusion, upadacitinib was effective in treating not only psoriasiform eczema, but also several immune mediated comorbidities. Additional studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of upadacitinib in alopecia areata, vitiligo and hidradenitis suppurativa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An efficient and scalable Buchwald‐Hartwig amination towards the synthesis of the API candidate 4‐((2‐Chlorophenyl)amino)‐6‐((6‐methylpyridin‐2‐yl)amino)nicotinamide as a JAK inhibitor was described. The process was developed using water and a water‐miscible co‐solvent. It was facilitated by the benign by design surfactant TPGS‐750‐M, that promoted the robust and reliable preparation of our target compound in high yields, with improved reaction profile and via an operationally simple protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document summarizes a study on the cardiovascular risks of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in patients with rheumatic diseases. The study found that the impact of JAKi on cardiovascular risk is complex and may vary depending on factors such as baseline risk factors, disease activity, and type of rheumatic disease. Some studies suggest an increased cardiovascular risk with JAKi, especially in older patients with risk factors, while others found no significant difference compared to other treatments. More research is needed to fully understand the relationship between JAKi and cardiovascular risk. [Extracted from the article]

Tuberculosis (TB) is a common complication associated with treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. However, there is uncertainty about the risk of TB relapse in patients with TB and comorbidities requiring treatment with these agents. To assess the risk of TB relapse in patients (re-)started on TNF antagonists or JAK inhibitors. Systematic review. PubMed and Cochrane Library databases until 11 December 2023. Randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case reports and case series. Patients with current or previous TB who were (re-)started on TNF antagonists or JAK inhibitors. (Re-)introduction of TNF antagonists and JAK inhibitors. All studies meeting entry criteria were included regardless of quality. Categorical data are presented as frequencies and percentages. For non-normally distributed aggregated data, we calculated the pooled weighted median with 95% CI. For individual patient data, the median and interquartile range (IQR) were calculated. Of 5018 articles screened for eligibility, 67 publications reporting on 368 TB patients who (re-)initiated treatment with TNF antagonists for underlying diseases were included. The median age was 42.5 years (95% CI: 40.4–42.5) and the proportion of female patients was 36.6% (n = 74) of patients whose sex was reported. A total of 14 patients (3.8%, 95% CI: 2.1–6.3%) developed TB relapse after a median of 8.5 months (interquartile range, 6.8–14.8 months) following (re-)initiation of anti-TNF treatment. Furthermore, among 251 articles screened for eligibility, 11 reports on TB patients who were (re-)started on JAK inhibitors for underlying diseases were identified. The median age was 62 years (interquartile range, 48.5–68.5 years) and 45.5% (n = 5) were female. Only one patient (9.1%; 95% CI: 0.2–41.3%) had TB reactivation 10 months after starting treatment with ruxolitinib. In addition, 94 patients who were treated with TNF antagonists and two patients temporarily treated with JAK inhibitors for the prevention or treatment of paradoxical reactions were analysed. None of the publications reported microbiological failure or worsening of TB-related symptoms. (Re-)initiation of TNF antagonists and JAK inhibitors may be relatively safe in patients with current or previous TB and the need for further treatment of underlying diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vitiligo is a chronic depigmenting disorder that significantly impacts the quality of life of patients. Though there have been significant advancements in targeted therapies in skin diseases such as psoriasis or eczema, the progress in the treatment of vitiligo has been slow, with minimal studies assessing the effect of biologics, though there has been recent evidence of the effectiveness of JAK inhibition. This paper reviews the published case reports and studies for the use of systemic targeted therapies including biologics and JAK inhibitors in vitiligo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vitiligo is a chronic skin condition caused by an autoimmune response that results in the progressive loss of melanocytes and recent studies have suggested that Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are emerging as a promising new treatment modality. Therefore, to assess and understand the extent of knowledge in the emerging field of JAKi use in vitiligo, a scoping review of the literature was undertaken. The reviewed articles explored a wide variety of JAKi administered either orally or topically for vitiligo. There were no injectable JAKi studied. Tofacitinib was the most commonly studied oral JAKi in 16 of the 35 studies selected for review, followed by baricitinib (n = 3), and one study each with ritlecitinib, ruxolitinib, and upadacitinib. Ruxolitinib (n = 6) and tofacitinib (n = 6) were the most often studied topical JAKi, followed by delgocitinib (n = 1). Potential benefits may vary between JAKi based on their receptor selectivity profile and coexistent autoimmune diseases. A topical JAKi would be advantageous in limited body area involvement and in adolescents. Concurrent use of JAKi with phototherapy or sun exposure appears beneficial. Most studies permitted the use of other topical agents. Acne‐related events, though frequent yet mild, were reported with both oral and topical JAKi. Nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, and headaches were the most common adverse effects seen in the larger trials with JAKi. No serious or clinically meaningful hematology or thromboembolic events were detected. Treatment of vitiligo with oral or topical JAKi seems to be promising and the growing evidence shows a favorable risk‐benefit profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vitiligo and alopecia areata are both autoimmune skin diseases, and the chances of co-occurrence are very low. Conventional treatments often include glucocorticoids, which have many adverse reactions with long-term use and are difficult to achieve satisfactory results. Upadacitinib has been found to be effective in both vitiligo and alopecia areata due to partial overlap in pathogenic pathways. We report the successful treatment of vitiligo combined with alopecia areata in a nine-year-old child with upadacitinib in combination with UVB. The area of vitiligo and alopecia areata decreased significantly, and satisfactory results were obtained. It provides a new idea for the treatment of vitiligo complicated with alopecia areata in children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Patients with alopecia areata (AA) may have received several therapies for management of AA during their lives. In the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 (NCT03732807) study, the oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor ritlecitinib demonstrated efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients aged ≥ 12 years with AA and ≥ 50% scalp hair loss. This post hoc analysis investigated associations between prior use of AA therapies and Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) responses in patients receiving ritlecitinib for AA. Methods Patients receiving ritlecitinib 30 mg or 50 mg once daily with or without an initial 4-week 200-mg daily loading dose were grouped by previous exposure to AA treatments, including topicals, intralesional corticosteroids (ILCS), topical immunotherapy, and systemic immunosuppressants or any prior AA treatment. Multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluated the association between response based on a SALT score of ≤ 20 and any prior treatment for AA at weeks 24 and 48. Results Of 522 patients, 360 (69.0%) had previous exposure to any AA treatment. At Week 24, SALT ≤ 20 response was positively associated with prior use of ILCS (odds ratio [OR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–3.65; P 0.05). Previous exposure to any AA therapy was not associated with SALT ≤ 20 response at weeks 24 or 48 (all P > 0.05). Conclusions Prior AA treatment history had no effect on longer-term treatment response to ritlecitinib. Trial Registration Number NCT03732807. Graphical Abstract

Abstract Background Chronic hand dermatitis (CHD) has suboptimal treatments and a negative impact on quality of life (QoL). Topical ruxolitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, is approved for vitiligo and mild‐to‐moderate atopic dermatitis, but has not previously been studied specifically for CHD. Objectives Evaluate the impact of ruxolitinib in CHD. Methods A 12‐week, investigator‐initiated, open‐label trial evaluated ruxolitinib 1.5% in 15 adults with recalcitrant moderate‐to‐severe CHD. Primary outcomes included the proportion of patients: (1) achieving an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) treatment success (0 or 1 score with a two‐step improvement) (2) a Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI)‐75 improvement at 12 weeks. Additional outcomes: clinical improvement at 4 and 8 weeks, improvement in itch (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]) and QoL outcomes (i.e., Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] and Skindex‐Mini). Results At 12 weeks, 13/15 participants (86%) achieved a HECSI‐75, 12/15 participants (80%) had a two‐point reduction in IGA and 8/15 participants (53%) achieved an IGA treatment success. Both atopic dermatitis (AD; n = 7) and non‐AD (n = 8) CHD participants had clinical improvement in HECSI at 12 weeks (p

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a distressing skin condition characterized by the recurrent appearance of itchy hives. A subset of CSU patients remains resistant to conventional treatment with high-dose antihistamines. Tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has shown promise in various inflammatory skin diseases. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral tofacitinib in patients with CSU resistant to antihistamines. Methods: This study examined data retrospectively from seven patients who were diagnosed with CSU and were treated with tofacitinib for at least six months. These patients initially exhibited resistance to treatment with four-fold up-dosed antihistamines. One of the patients was already on omalizumab, and another was tried on cyclosporine. The patients were administered oral tofacitinib at a dosage of 5 mg twice daily for six months. Patients were followed up monthly for disease control and side effects. The response to treatment was evaluated using the urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) and urticaria control test (UCT). Paired t-tests were conducted to determine the statistical significance of the results using SPSS version 25 software. Results: Six out of the seven patients demonstrated a significant improvement in both UAS7 and UCT scores after six months of treatment with oral tofacitinib. The mean UAS7 score decreased from 24.86 at baseline to 3.83 at the study endpoint (P < 0.0001). Similarly, the mean UCT score increased from 0.57 at baseline to 14 at the study endpoint (P < 0.0001). The standard deviations for both measures were 4.85 and 0.98 at baseline and 3.1 and 3.1 at the study endpoint for UAS7 and UCT, respectively. Conclusion: In this six-month follow-up study, oral tofacitinib demonstrated significant efficacy in treating CSU patients’ resistant to high-dose antihistamines. Most patients experienced a remarkable reduction in urticaria activity and an improvement in disease control. These findings suggest that tofacitinib holds promise as a potential therapeutic option for this challenging subset of CSU patients. However, larger, randomized controlled trials are warranted to further investigate the long-term safety and effectiveness of tofacitinib in this population.

Tissue cytokines in chronic hand eczema (CHE) can predict targeted therapy with novel drugs including JAK inhibitors. Our primary objective was to assess the tissue expression of cytokines of Th1 and Th2 cell lines in CHE patients and to study the efficacy of oral tofacitinib. We recruited patients presenting with recalcitrant CHE. Lesional and non-lesional tissue samples were assessed for Th1(IFN-γ, TNF-α) and Th2 related cytokines (IL-4, IL-13, IL-2,) using real time PCR. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily was initiated with 4 weekly assessment and we also noted relapses post therapy. Of 21 refractory hyperkeratotic CHE patients, cytokine analysis was performed in 11 patients which showed upregulation of IL-4 [n = 5/11, 1.87-fold increase], TNF-α (n = 5/11, 5.13-fold) and IFN-γ (n = 6/11, 1.98-fold) as compared to uninvolved skin. All patients (100%) had used topical corticosteroids (TCS) and 4/21 (19%) had failed methotrexate and 2/21 (9.5%) had failed acitretin. Tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily was given in 15/21 patients. The mean time to achieve hand eczema severity index 90 (HECSI 90) was 4 weeks (mean duration of treatment:5.8 months, n = 12). Side effects were observed in 4/12 (33.3%) patients and relapse was noted in 3/12 (25%) patients after a mean duration of 7 months after discontinuation of tofacitinib. Tofacitinib (pan-JAK inhibitor) showed an excellent response in refractory CHE patients with predominant tissue Th1/Th2 cells related cytokine expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Both bullous pemphigoid (BP) and psoriasis are common immune-related dermatological conditions in clinical practice, but the co-occurrence of these two diseases is rare. Currently, there is no consensus on the long-term safe and effective treatment for patients with both BP and psoriasis. JAK inhibitors are emerging as targeted therapeutic drugs that act by inhibiting Janus kinase activity, regulating the JAK/STAT pathway, blocking the transduction pathway of key proinflammatory cytokines, and influencing T-cell differentiation. These cytokines upstream of the JAK/STAT pathway play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of numerous inflammatory and autoimmune disorders. Upadacitinib, a second-generation JAK inhibitor with high selectivity, demonstrates promising potential. This case report aims to provide a description of the successful treatment of bullous pemphigoid (BP) and psoriasis vulgaris by using upadacitinib, highlighting significant clinical outcomes. Additionally, we aim to analyze the underlying mechanism of upadacitinib in treating these two comorbidities by reviewing relevant literature from both domestic and international sources. Based on our clinical observations, upadacitinib appears to be a promising and well-tolerated therapeutic option for patients with concurrent BP and psoriasis, offering valuable insights for developing appropriate treatment strategies in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Ruxolitinib (selective Janus kinase [JAK] 1 and JAK2 inhibitor) cream demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) in the phase 3 TRuE-AD studies. In TRuE-AD1/ TRuE-AD2 (NCT03745638/NCT03745651), adults and adolescents with mild to moderate AD were randomized to apply twice-daily ruxolitinib cream or vehicle for eightweeks. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of ruxolitinib cream by anatomic region, focusing on head/neck (HN) lesions that are typically difficult to manage and disproportionately affect quality of life (QoL). Materials and methods: Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) responses in anatomic regions were evaluated in the pooled population (N=1208) and among patients with baseline HN involvement (n=663). Itch, Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA), QoL, and application site tolerability were also assessed. Results: By Week 2 (earliest assessment), ruxolitinib cream application resulted in significant improvements across all EASI anatomic region subscores and AD signs versus vehicle, with further improvements through Week 8. Significantly more patients with HN involvement who applied ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle achieved clinically meaningful improvements in itch, IGA, and QoL. Application site reactions with ruxolitinib cream were infrequent (<3%), including in patients with HN involvement. Conclusions: These results support the use of ruxolitinib cream for AD treatment across all anatomic regions, including HN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, has been shown to have lower thromboembolism rates compared to placebo in polycythemia vera (PV) patients. This meta‐analysis evaluates ruxolitinib's efficacy and safety against best available therapy (BAT) in patients with PV and in hydroxyurea‐resistant/intolerant PV patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to November 2023. We compared ruxolitinib and BAT for efficacy and safety endpoints. Six studies involving 1061 patients were analyzed, with 620 on BAT and 441 on ruxolitinib. Ruxolitinib showed higher hematocrit control (p = 0.015) and treatment response (p = 0.04) compared to BAT. It also significantly improved Myeloproliferative Neoplasms‐Symptom Assessment Form scores (MPN‐SAF) (p < 0.01). Additionally, patients with PV treated with ruxolitinib had higher rates of nonmelanoma skin cancer (p < 0.01). In subgroup analyses focusing on patients resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea, ruxolitinib maintained its efficacy, significantly improving treatment response (p < 0.01) and significant improvements in MPN‐SAF (p = 0.02) score when compared to BAT. The safety profile was consistent with the overall analyses, showing significantly reduced thromboembolism rates (p = 0.04), increased rates of anemia (p = 0.01), and increased herpes zoster infections (p = 0.02). Ruxolitinib outperforms BAT in PV and patients with PV‐resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea, offering better hematocrit control and reducing symptomatic burden and thromboembolism risk. Yet, it is associated with higher rates of anemia, herpes infection, and skin cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy of JAK inhibitors in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) and non-D2TRA patients and evaluate the factors influencing their efficacy using real-world data. Method: Here, 159 JAK inhibitor-treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis were categorized into D2TRA and non-D2TRA groups. Data including the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at initiation and 6 months after drug administration, drug retention months, and reason for discontinuation due to toxic adverse events were collected. Results: The retention rates at 6 months were 64.0% (D2TRA) and 78.4% (non-D2TRA) and were significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.030). The discontinuation rate owing to toxic adverse events significantly differed between the two groups (p = 0.030). The CDAI-low disease activity (LDA) rates differed significantly between the two groups (non-D2TRA, 62.3%; D2TRA, 34%; p < 0.001). CDAI-LDA achievement at 6 months after drug introduction was significantly associated with the number of times that biologic and/or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs were previously used and the CDAI at baseline in all patients treated with JAK inhibitors. However, no predictive factors were identified for D2TRA patients treated with JAK inhibitors. Conclusion: Compared to non-D2TRA patients, D2TRA patients demonstrated significantly lower drug retention rates, CDAI-LDA achievement rates, and safety of JAK inhibitors. No significant predictive factor for CDAI-LDA achievement 6 months after drug introduction was detected in D2TRA patients. Key Points • The retention of JAK inhibitors were significantly lower for the treatment of D2TRA patients in comparison with non-D2TRA patients. • The efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors were significantly lower for the treatment of D2TRA patients. • Number of previous uses of b/tsDMARDs and CDAI at baseline were identified as the predictive factors for resistance to CDAI-LDA achievement to JAK inhibitor treatment. • No significant predictive factor for CDAI-LDA achievement 6 months after drug introduction was detected in D2TRA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Recent single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis revealed the functional heterogeneity and pathogenic cell subsets in immune cells, synovial fibroblasts and bone cells in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). JAK inhibitors which ameliorate joint inflammation and bone destruction in RA, suppress the activation of various types of cells in vitro. However, the key cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the potent clinical effects of JAK inhibitors on RA remain to be determined. Our aim is to identify a therapeutic target for JAK inhibitors in vivo. Methods We performed scRNA-seq analysis of the synovium of collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice treated with or without a JAK inhibitor, followed by a computational analysis to identify the drug target cells and signaling pathways. We utilized integrated human RA scRNA-seq datasets and genetically modified mice administered with the JAK inhibitor for the confirmation of our findings. Results scRNA-seq analysis revealed that oncostatin M (OSM) driven macrophage-fibroblast interaction is highly activated under arthritic conditions. OSM derived from macrophages, acts on OSM receptor (OSMR)-expressing synovial fibroblasts, activating both inflammatory and tissue-destructive subsets. Inflammatory synovial fibroblasts stimulate macrophages, mainly through IL-6, to exacerbate inflammation. Tissue-destructive synovial fibroblasts promote osteoclast differentiation by producing RANKL to accelerate bone destruction. scRNA-seq analysis also revealed that OSM-signaling in synovial fibroblasts is the main signaling pathway targeted by JAK inhibitors in vivo. Mice specifically lacking OSMR in synovial fibroblasts (Osmr ∆Fibro) displayed ameliorated inflammation and joint destruction in arthritis. The JAK inhibitor was effective on the arthritis of the control mice while it had no effect on the arthritis of Osmr ∆Fibro mice. Conclusions OSM functions as one of the key cytokines mediating pathogenic macrophage-fibroblast interaction. OSM-signaling in synovial fibroblasts is one of the main signaling pathways targeted by JAK inhibitors in vivo. The critical role of fibroblast-OSM signaling in autoimmune arthritis was shown by a combination of mice specifically deficient for OSMR in synovial fibroblasts and administration of the JAK inhibitor. Thus, the OSM-driven synovial macrophage-fibroblast circuit is proven to be a key driver of autoimmune arthritis, serving as a crucial drug target in vivo.

Abstract Background To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib monotherapy versus methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy over 5 years among MTX-naïve patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 3 SELECT-EARLY trial. Methods Patients were randomized to receive upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg or MTX. Patients who did not achieve CDAI remission and had

Janet Pope,1 Axel Finckh,2 Lucia Silva-Fernández,3 Peter Mandl,4 Haiyun Fan,5 Jose L Rivas,6 Monica Valderrama,6 Maria Montoro6 1Division of Rheumatology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; 2Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; 3Rheumatology Department, A Coruña University Hospital Complex, A Coruña, Spain; 4Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; 5Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, USA; 6Pfizer SLU, Madrid, SpainCorrespondence: Maria Montoro, Pfizer SLU, Madrid, Spain, Email maria.montoro@pfizer.comPurpose: To evaluate the characteristics, efficacy, and retention of tofacitinib monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world data (RWD).Patients and Methods: Three patient groups receiving tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) monotherapy were defined for post hoc RCT/long-term extension (LTE) analyses: (1) disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-inadequate responder patients from phase 3/3b/4 RCTs; (2) methotrexate-naïve patients from a phase 3 RCT; and (3) index study patients continuing in an LTE study. Outcomes included low disease activity (LDA)/remission rates defined by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI); Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28-4), erythrocyte sedimentation rate; DAS28-4, C-reactive protein (DAS28-4[CRP]); and rates of/time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy/adverse events. RWD were identified by non-systematic literature searches of PubMed, Embase, and American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology congress abstracts (2012– 2022).Results: RCT/LTE analyses included 1000/498 patients receiving tofacitinib 5 mg BID monotherapy. Baseline disease activity was high; patients tended to receive concomitant glucocorticoids; most were biologic DMARD-naïve. CDAI LDA rates were 32.2– 62.2% for Groups 1/2 (months 3– 12) and 64.0– 70.7% for Group 3 (months 12– 72). In Groups 1, 2, and 3, 4.0%, 15.6%, and 27.7% of patients, respectively, discontinued tofacitinib monotherapy due to lack of efficacy/adverse events. From 11 RWD publications, 16.6– 66.1% received tofacitinib monotherapy. Consistent with clinical data, tofacitinib monotherapy effectiveness (month 6 CDAI LDA, 30.2%; month 3 DAS28-4[CRP] remission, 53.4%) and persistence were observed in RWD, with retention comparable to tofacitinib combination therapy.Conclusion: Tofacitinib monotherapy demonstrated clinically significant responses/persistence in RCT/LTE analyses, with effectiveness observed and persistence comparable to combination therapy in RWD.Trial Registration: NCT00814307, NCT02187055, NCT01039688, NCT00413699, NCT00661661 (ClinicalTrials.gov).Keywords: autoimmune, JAK inhibitor, clinical practice, long-term, efficacy, retention

Abstract Background The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) is a standardized method for quantifying scalp hair loss in alopecia areata (AA). SALT scores can be used to guide treatment decisions and are widely used as eligibility criteria and endpoints for clinical trials in AA. However, clinicians may be unfamiliar with assessing and envisioning SALT scores in practice. Objectives To aid clinicians in the determination and application of SALT scores in a clinical setting, this manuscript seeks to contextualize SALT scores using patient images from a clinical trial of adults with severe AA. Methods Images from 722 patients enrolled in BRAVE‐AA1, a phase 2/3 study of baricitinib in adults with severe AA (SALT score ≥50; ≥50% scalp hair loss), were obtained at baseline and Weeks 12, 36, and 52 and compiled into a repository. Photographs were selected to represent SALT scores across the full range of disease (SALT scores 0–100) and to demonstrate the progression of SALT scores during the course of treatment. Results Images of six patients depict the range of SALT scores (0–100). Photographs are of male and female patients of different ages (21–69) and races (Asian, Black, White) with varying extent, density, and patterns of hair loss. Images of two additional patients demonstrate the use of SALT to monitor treatment progress, showing distinct patterns and timing of clinical response over 52 weeks of therapy. Conclusions The SALT is widely used in clinical trials for AA, but clinicians may lack familiarity. Presented patient images show SALT scores commonly used as eligibility criteria and endpoints in clinical trials, which may be useful in identifying patients eligible for systemic treatment and in visualizing therapeutic response.

Introduction: Conventional rosacea treatments are not uniformly pervasive, and the adverse reactions can potentially constrain their utility. The clinical use of JAK1 inhibitors upadacitinib and abrocitinib in the treatment of refractory rosacea has rarely been explored. Case report: We presented two cases of patients who received the JAK1 inhibitor upadacitinib and four cases of patients who received the JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib for the treatment of refractory rosacea. Discussion: The JAK1 inhibitors upadacitinib and abrocitinib may be promising medical options for patients with refractory rosacea. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib and abrocitinib require prospective controlled studies to assess them more comprehensively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STING‐associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI) is a rare, monogenic interferonopathy caused by gain‐of‐function variants in STING1 (TMEM173) characterized by systemic inflammation, cutaneous vasculopathy, and interstitial lung disease. We report a case of SAVI attributed to a novel STING1 p.R284T variant who demonstrated characteristic cutaneous features including telangiectasias, livedo and acrocyanotic changes on face and extremities, as well as saddle nose deformity, failure to thrive, inflammatory arthritis and notable lack of pulmonary disease or autoantibody positivity. Due to the risk for progressive and irreversible lung and tissue damage and evolving therapeutic landscape involving the use of Janus kinase inhibitors, it is critical to recognize variable clinical phenotypes to diagnose and consider treatment options for SAVI patients early in their disease course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Japan and other countries. Nearly one-third of patients do not respond to standard systemic steroid therapy and no standard second-line treatment has been established in Japan. We report efficacy and safety findings of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) from a subgroup analysis of the international, phase 3 REACH2 study in Japanese patients with steroid-refractory aGvHD. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at day 28. Overall, 9 patients received ruxolitinib and 21 received BAT. The ORR at day 28 (88.9% vs 52.4%) and durable ORR at day 56 (66.7% vs 28.6%) were higher with ruxolitinib versus BAT. The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 12.5% with ruxolitinib and 18.2% with BAT. The median failure-free survival was longer with ruxolitinib versus BAT (2.73 vs 1.25 months). The most common adverse events up to day 28 in the ruxolitinib and BAT groups were anemia (55.6% vs 19.0%) and thrombocytopenia (44.4% vs 4.8%, respectively). Ruxolitinib showed better efficacy outcomes and a consistent safety profile compared with BAT in the Japanese subgroup, and the findings were consistent with overall study results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases. Recently, new therapeutic options for patients with moderate-to-severe AD have emerged, such as dupilumab or janus kinase inhibitors. This paper presents the case of a patient who developed a rare exanthematous skin adverse reaction after the administration of the initial dose of dupilumab. Aim of the study: To showcase new therapeutic alternatives for patients with moderate-to- -severe AD, such as dupilumab or Janus kinase inhibitors. Material and methods: A retrospective review of the procedure and patient follow-up was undertaken. Case report: A 43-year-old female with severe atopic dermatitis, was admitted to the Department of Dermatology. The patient presented with severe erythematous lesions on the lateral surfaces of the trunk, and upper and lower extremities, accompanied by intense pruritis, which appeared 24 hours after starting dupilumab treatment. Because of the suspicion of adverse drug reaction further treatment with dupilumab was suspended. Improvement of skin lesions was observed within a few days. Due to persistent symptoms of severe AD patient was qualified for upadacitinib - Janus kinase 1 inhibitor (JAK-1) with a highly successful clinical response and continued treatment without any adverse events. Conclusions: The take-home message is that even a relatively safe biologic therapy can cause the occurrence of undesirable symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: It remains unclear which therapy contributes to atopic dermatitis (AD) remission and to what extent. We aimed to clarify which therapy contributes to the treatment of AD by investigating the time-to-remission and remission hazard ratios for each therapy using real-world data. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 110 patients diagnosed with AD after their first visit to the Department of Dermatology at Fukuoka University Hospital between 2016 and 2022. The patients were categorized into six treatment groups: 1) topical treatment alone or topical treatment plus 2) ultraviolet light, 3) oral steroids, 4) oral cyclosporine, 5) dupilumab, and 6) oral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). The topical therapy alone group served as the control, and the hazard ratios for remission (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] 0/1) were calculated. Results: Forty patients achieved remission, while 70 did not (IGA ≥2) with the first treatment regimen. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age, sex, and severity at the first visit (IGA) revealed that the hazard ratios for remission were 4.2 (95% confidence interval (C.I.): 1.28-13.83, p = 0.018) for the oral cyclosporine group, 5.05 (95% C.I.: 1.96-13, p = 0.001) for the dupilumab group, and 67.56 (95% C.I.: 12.28-371.68, p < .0001) for the oral JAKi group. The median time to remission was 3 months for JAKi, cyclosporine, and steroid was shorter than 6 months for dupilumab. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Oral therapy with small molecules requires a shorter duration to achieve remission. However, long-term safety and recurrence are important indicators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This integrated analysis of the phase 2/3 and phase 3 SELECT trials describes the safety profile of upadacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, for up to 5 years of exposure across psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) (including pooled axial spondyloarthritis [axSpA]). Methods: Safety data from five trials of upadacitinib in PsA (2 trials), AS (2 trials), and nr-axSpA (1 trial) were analyzed up to a data cut-off of August 15, 2022. One PsA study included adalimumab as an active comparator. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were summarized for PsA (pooled upadacitinib 15 mg once daily and adalimumab 40 mg biweekly), AS (pooled upadacitinib 15 mg), nr-axSpA (upadacitinib 15 mg), and pooled axSpA (pooled upadacitinib 15 mg from axSpA trials). TEAEs were reported as exposure-adjusted event rates per 100 patient-years (E/100 PY). Results: A total of 1789 patients (PsA, n = 907; AS, n = 596; nr-axSpA, n = 286) received ≥ 1 dose of upadacitinib 15 mg for 3689 PY of exposure or adalimumab (n = 429) for 1147 PY of exposure. Overall TEAEs and serious TEAEs were highest in PsA and numerically higher with upadacitinib versus adalimumab; rates were similar between AS and nr-axSpA. In PsA, higher rates of serious infection, herpes zoster (HZ), lymphopenia, and nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) were observed with upadacitinib versus adalimumab. Rates of malignancy excluding NMSC, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, and adjudicated venous thromboembolic events were comparable between upadacitinib and adalimumab in PsA and were similar across diseases. Conclusion: Higher rates of serious infection, HZ, lymphopenia, and NMSC were observed with upadacitinib versus adalimumab in PsA; slightly elevated rates for most of these TEAEs were seen with upadacitinib in PsA versus axSpA. Upadacitinib 15 mg demonstrated a generally consistent safety profile across disease states with no new safety signals identified. Trial Registration: SELECT-AXIS 1: NCT03178487; SELECT-AXIS 2: NCT04169373; SELECT-PsA 1: NCT03104400; SELECT-PsA 2: NCT03104374. Plain Language Summary: Psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis are a group of diseases that cause pain and inflammation of the joints and/or spine. Safety data were combined from five studies: two in psoriatic arthritis, two in ankylosing spondylitis, and one in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Patients were treated with upadacitinib or adalimumab for up to 5 years. Adalimumab was only used for patients participating in one of the two psoriatic arthritis studies. Side effects from treatment were more common in patients with psoriatic arthritis than those with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis; more patients with psoriatic arthritis had side effects with upadacitinib than adalimumab. A similar number of patients across treatment groups and diseases had side effects that made them stop treatment. The number of cancer cases (except cancer of the upper layer of the skin), cardiovascular issues, and blood clots were similar between the upadacitinib and adalimumab groups in psoriatic arthritis and across diseases. Serious infections, painful rashes that cause blisters (herpes zoster, also commonly referred to as shingles), low levels of white blood cells, and cancer of the upper layer of the skin were more common with upadacitinib than adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis; overall, these events occurred more often with upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis than with ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Our results showed that the safety of upadacitinib was generally similar across diseases, and patients could tolerate it well for up to 5 years. No new safety risks were found with upadacitinib treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study aimed to describe the long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib and adalimumab through 228 weeks following immediate switch to the alternate therapy with a different mechanism of action (MoA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) not achieving treatment goals with their initial randomized therapy in the ongoing phase 3 SELECT-COMPARE study. Methods: Patients with non-response or incomplete response to initially prescribed upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or adalimumab 40 mg every other week were switched to the alternate therapy by week 26. Efficacy was evaluated through 228 weeks post-switch using validated outcome measures, including Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA; ≤ 10)/remission (≤ 2.8); 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein ≤ 3.2/< 2.6; ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria; and change from baseline in ACR core components. Data are reported as observed. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through week 264. Results: Of patients initially randomized to upadacitinib and adalimumab, 38.7% and 48.6%, respectively, switched to the alternate therapy by week 26. Clinically relevant improvements in all efficacy measures were observed through 228 weeks post-switch and were generally similar between groups, with small numeric differences mostly in favor of switching to upadacitinib. CDAI remission was achieved by 32.7% and 28.6% of initial non-responders, and 27.5% and 27.3% of incomplete responders, while CDAI LDA was achieved by 76.9% and 72.9% of non-responders, and 72.5% and 72.7% of incomplete responders switching to upadacitinib and to adalimumab, respectively. TEAE rates were similar between groups, although herpes zoster infection, lymphopenia, and creatine phosphokinase elevation were more frequent when switching to upadacitinib. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusion: Switching to a different MoA may provide long-term benefit to patients with RA not achieving treatment goals with their initial therapy, with acceptable safety profiles. Trial Registration: NCT02629159. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article provides a review of the use of Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in the treatment of various types of scarring alopecia. It discusses the potential benefits of JAKi therapy in improving symptoms and hair regrowth in patients with conditions such as lichen planopilaris, central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia, folliculitis decalvans, frontal fibrosing alopecia, and dissecting cellulitis of the scalp. The article acknowledges the need for further research to fully understand the effectiveness and potential side effects of JAKi in this context. Overall, JAKi therapy shows promise but more investigation is required. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: We retrospectively reviewed the records of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who underwent orthopaedic surgery to examine the influence of the perioperative use of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors on early postoperative complications. Patients and Methods: Thirty-two patients with RA under disease control with JAK inhibitors who underwent 49 orthopaedic procedures were included in the study. Patient records after surgery were investigated for surgical site infection (SSI), delayed wound healing (DWH), a flare-up of the disease, preoperative and postoperative absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs), venous thromboembolism, and other postoperative complications. Results: JAK inhibitors were continued during the perioperative period in 31 procedures. In the remaining 18 procedures, JAK inhibitors were discontinued perioperatively with a mean discontinuation period of 2.4 days. No instances of SSI were identified in any patient during at least 90 days' follow-up, while DWH was seen in one patient. Disease flare-up was noted in two patients after 3 and 9 days of discontinuation of JAK inhibitors, respectively. The ALCs significantly decreased on postoperative Day 1 (P < .0001), and there was a significant correlation between pre- and post-one-day ALCs (r = 0.75, P < .0001). Conclusion: JAK inhibitors seem to be safe during the perioperative period of orthopaedic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in treatment-refractory inflammatory myositis in a real-world clinical setting. Methods All patients with refractory inflammatory myositis treated with tofacitinib from a single urban centre in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, were included from June 2016 to December 2022. The medical records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Results A total of 41 patients were included, 23 with classic DM, 12 with amyopathic DM (ADM) and six with PM phenotype. The patients failed an average of four to five non-steroidal immunosuppressants before initiation of tofacitinib. In the classic DM and ADM group, tofacitinib offered clinically and statistically significant cutaneous improvement. In all myositis patients including the PM phenotype, no meaningful muscle strength response to tofacitinib was observed. 53.7% of the patients discontinued tofacitinib due to lack of benefit or death. Of the 19 patients who remained on tofacitinib at the conclusion of this study, tofacitinib demonstrated clinically and statistically significant improvement in cutaneous disease activity. Conclusion Tofacitinib appears to be highly effective in targeting cutaneous manifestations in classic DM and ADM; however, minimal benefit in muscle strength in the DM or PM phenotype were observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundBullous pemphigoid (BP) is a rare, life-threatening autoimmune blistering disease with pruritus and tension blisters/bullous as the main clinical manifestations. Glucocorticosteroids are the main therapeutic agents for it, but their efficacy is poor in some patients. Tofacitinib, a small molecule agent that inhibits JAK1/3, has shown incredible efficacy in a wide range of autoimmune diseases and maybe a new valuable treatment option for refractory BP.ObjectiveTo report a case of refractory BP successfully treated with tofacitinib, then explore the underlying mechanism behind the treatment, and finally review similarities to other cases reported in the literature.MethodsCase report and literature review of published cases of successful BP treatment with JAK inhibitors. The case report describes a 73-year-old male with refractory BP that was successfully managed with the combination therapy of tofacitinib and low-dose glucocorticoids for 28 weeks. Immunohistochemistry and RNA sequencing were performed to analyze the underlying mechanism of tofacitinib therapy. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify other cases of treatment with JAK inhibitors.ResultsThroughout the 28-week treatment period, the patient experienced clinical, autoantibody and histologic resolution. Immunohistochemical analysis showed tofacitinib significantly decreased the pSTAT3 and pSTAT6 levels in the skin lesions of this patient. RNA sequencing and immunohistochemical testing of lesion samples from other BP patients identified activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Literature review revealed 17 previously reported cases of BP treated with four kinds of JAK inhibitors successfully, including tofacitinib (10), baricitinib (1), upadacitinib (3) and abrocitinib (3).ConclusionsOur findings support the potential of tofacitinib as a safe and effective treatment option for BP. Larger studies are underway to better understand this efficacy and safety.

Abstract Filgotinib, a janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, is used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA‐associated interstitial lung disease (RA‐ILD) is a severe RA complication with no established effective treatment. We report the case of a patient with RA‐ILD successfully treated with filgotinib. A 46‐year‐old woman with RA and RA‐ILD, presenting with a non‐specific interstitial pneumonia pattern, was refractory to abatacept and prednisolone but responded to filgotinib. Both arthritis and RA‐ILD improved significantly, and the patient remained in remission for over 12 months. Basic research indicates that JAK1 plays a role in the cytokine signal transduction in ILD; however, there are no clinical reports on the efficacy of filgotinib in RA‐ILD. This case suggests filgotinib as a potential treatment for patients with RA‐ILD, particularly in the early stages of this disease.