Multiple studies have demonstrated that the addition of clopidogrel to lifelong aspirin therapy is effective in reducing the composite endpoint of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [1,2]. However, the problem with the one size fits all 75 mg/day clopidogrel maintenance therapy is the wide variability in individual responses to it [3]. Therefore, it has been demonstrated that an individual risk-stratification with platelet function tests may identify patients who are at a high risk for the occurrence of atherothrombotic events [4–7]. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is generally considered to be the gold standard method of measurement of platelet function and it has been suggested that the focus of interpretation of the results from LTA in clopidogrel-treated patients should be the absolute level of late aggregation instead of peak aggregation [8]. The rationale behind this theory is the following. Two platelet surface adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptors have now been characterized: the Gq-protein coupled P2Y1 receptor, which is responsible for platelet shape change, phospholipase C activation and calcium release from internal stores, and the Giprotein coupled P2Y12 receptor, which is responsible for the inhibition of adenylyl cyclise [9]. The active metabolite of clopidogrel selectively inhibits ADP binding to P2Y12 but not P2Y1. Platelets from patients with a P2Y12 deficiency and platelets from patients with a structural defective P2Y12 are still capable of changing shape and aggregating (although this aggregation is rapidly reversible with loosely bound platelets with few contact points), and fail to attenuate PGE1-induced cAMP production. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that P2Y1 is mainly responsible for the maximal amplitude of platelet aggregation whereas P2Y12 is responsible for the stabilization of aggregation [10–12]. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a difference exist between ADP-induced peak aggregation and late aggregation in patients who have been treated with an aspirin and clopidogrel maintenance dose for a long period of time (> 5 days). Classical LTA induced by four different concentrations (2, 5, 10 and 20 lmol L) of ADP was performed in 164 patients who were on a maintenance of 75 mg of clopidogrel for >five days. All patients were also on ‡80 mg of aspirin for at least seven days. The local Institutional Review Board approved the protocol and written informed consent was obtained before elective PCI. LTA was quantified in non-adjusted platelet-rich plasma (PRP) at maximal (peak) aggregation and after 360 s (late aggregation) with an APACT 4004 four-channel light transmission aggregometer (LABiTec, Arensburg, Germany). Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 150 · g to obtain native PRP and the platelet count was assessed on a routine cellcounter (LH 750, Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany). Samples tubes containing 3.2% of citrate were used for the analysis of platelet function. Both peak and late aggregation at 360 s were highly variable between subjects (mean ± SD were 27 ± 11% vs. 12 ± 9%, 46 ± 12% vs. 23 ± 16%, 55 ± 13% vs. 34 ± 21%, and 61 ± 12% vs. 44 ± 22% for 2, 5, 10, and 20 lmol L of ADP, respectively). Furthermore, as illustrated in Fig. 1, peak aggregation was strongly correlated with late aggregation (r 1⁄4 0.72, 0.76, 0.86, and 0.93, all P < 0.01, for 2, 5, 10, and 20 lmol L of ADP, respectively). Multiple studies have demonstrated that patients with an inadequate response to clopidogrel therapy have an increased risk of developing atherothrombotic events [4–6]. However, to date, there is no predefined cutoff level to segregate clopidogrel poor responders from clopidogrel responders. As a consequence, the multiple studies linking clopidogrel poor response with a higher incidence of atherothrombotic events have all used different definitions to allocate clopidogrel poor responsiveness. In addition, some of them use the absolute change from baseline (off-drug aggregation) whereas others use one single measurement after a certain (but adequate) clopidogrel pretreatment period. Importantly, several of these studies are Correspondence: JochemW. van Werkum, Department of Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, the Netherlands. Tel.: +31 306099111; fax: +31 306034420; e-mail:w.van.werkum@ antonius.net