Search

In two women aged 76 and 29 years, who presented with cholangitis and small ductus choledochus calculi and with painless icterus respectively, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was carried out with papillotomy. Both developed a duodenal perforation which, however, could not be localized. The first patient eventually died, the second recovered after prolonged hospitalization. A third patient, a 53-year-old man, developed abdominal pain and fever four days after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ERCP was planned, but in the meantime the patient showed signs of recovery. The ERCP was carried out nevertheless. It failed and the patient suffered a prolonged recovery with necrotizing pancreatitis and multiple operations necessitating a temporary colostoma. In all three patients the endoscopic procedure was performed routinely without strict individualized indication. ERCP and papillotomy may be relatively safe procedures, but it should always be considered whether they will really serve the patient.

To find out if there were any differences in healing between end-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses for oesophagogastrostomy.Open study with historical controls.University hospital, The Netherlands.28 patients with end-to-end and 90 patients with end-to-side anastomoses after transhiatal oesophagectomy and partial gastrectomy for cancer of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction, with gastric tube reconstruction and cervical anastomosis.Leak and stricture rates, and the number of dilatations needed to relieve dysphagia.There were no significant differences in leak rates (end-to-end 4/28, 14%, and end-to-side 13/90, 14%) or anastomotic strictures (end-to-end 9/28, 32%, and end-to-side 26/90, 29%). The median number of dilatations needed to relieve dysphagia was 7 (1-33) after end-to-end and 9 (1-113) after end-to-side oesophagogastrostomy.There were no differences between the two methods of suture of cervical oesophagogastrostomy when leakage, stricture, and number of dilatations were used as criteria of good healing.

To assess the value of relative blood perfusion of the gastric tube in prediction of impaired healing of cervical oesophagogastrostomies.Prospective study.University hospital, The Netherlands.Thirty patients undergoing transhiatal oesophagectomy and partial gastrectomy for cancer of the oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction, with gastric tube reconstruction and cervical oesophagogastrostomy.Operative measurement of gastric blood perfusion at four sites by laser Doppler flowmetry and perfusion of the same sites after construction of the gastric tube expressed as a percentage of preconstruction values.The relative perfusion at the most proximal site of the gastric tube was significantly lower than at the more distal sites (p = 0.001). Nine of 18 patients (50%) in whom the perfusion of the proximal gastric tube was less than 70% of preconstruction values developed an anastomotic stricture, compared with only 1 of 12 patients (8%) with a relative perfusion of 70% or more (p = 0.024). A reduction in perfusion of the gastric tube did not predict leakage.Impaired anastomotic healing is unlikely if relative perfusion is 70% or more of preconstruction values. Perfusion of less than 70% partly predicts the occurrence of anastomotic stricture, but leakage cannot be predicted. Factors other than blood perfusion may have a role in the process of anastomotic healing.