Search

International audience; CONTEXT: Erlotinib therapy for non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has mainly been evaluated in randomized trials. METHOD: OBSTAR was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study involving all patients treated with erlotinib in 18 French centers between June 2005 and September 2007. The analyses focused on the patients' characteristics, previous treatments, and treatment efficacy during a three-year follow-up period. RESULTS: 534 patients were included in this study. The median survival times were respectively 5.2 [3.7-7.4] and 4.7 [4.1-5.7] months, depending to whether erlotinib was used as second- (n=190), or ≥third-line treatment (n=305). The disease control rate were 39.1% [30.2-48.7] and 29.9% [29.6-36.9] according to the line of treatment. Factors predictive of an objective response were gender, age, and smoking status. Factors predictive of progression were age, sex, smoking status, the line of treatment, and the number of metastases. Treatment had to be interrupted for toxicity in 8.5% of cases. CONCLUSION: This study of erlotinib therapy in 2005-2007 confirms, in the general NSCLC patient population, the results of pivotal trials.

Systemic mast cell disease (SMCD) can be regarded as a tumorous proliferation of tissue mast cells involving various organs. The frequency with which SMCD is found in patients with haematological disorders suggests that the association is non-random. The association includes primarily, myeloid disorders such as myelodysplastic syndromes and acute or chronic myeloproliferative disorders. Lymphoproliferative disorders may also occur but more rarely, mostly non-Hodgkin's low grade B cell lymphomas. In this report a case is described in which SMCD occurred in a patient with hairy cell leukaemia.

The purpose of this trial is to assess the possible benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer. Patients with operable stages I (except T 1N0), II, or IIIA disease are eligible for this ongoing trial. Patients are randomized into two arms. Surgery is performed first in group I; patients found to have T3 tumors or N2 lymph nodes are given postoperative radiotherapy. Group 2 patients start with two cycles of chemotherapy; following surgery, two more cycles are administered in responder patients and, as in group I, patients with T3 tumors or N2 lymph nodes are given radiotherapy. Chemotherapy is the MIP protocol: mitomycin 6 mg/m2 day I, ifosfamide 1.5 g/m2 days 1 to 3, cisplatin 30 mg/m2 days I to 3, and mesna 1,200 mg/m2 days 1 to 3. One hundred fifty patients were enrolled between June 1991 and September 1993. By the time this report was prepared, 117 patients had completed all assigned treatment, 63 in group I and 54 in group 2. There were two ineligible patients, one in each group. Forty-nine patients underwent thoracotomy in the chemotherapy-surgery group and 62 in the surgery-only group. There was only one progression after two cycles of chemotherapy. Rates of exploratory and incomplete surgery were 17% in group I and 12% in group 2. The trial is ongoing.

Adjuvant treatments of non-small cell lung cancer (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) before or after surgery, have been tested in numerous trials, more particularly as regards postoperative chemotherapy. For a long time the results were disappointing, and in randomized studies none of the therapeutic regimens prescribed could improve the patient’s survival. New hopes of advances in this matter were raised by Goldie and Coldman [1] whose mathematical concept recommended a systemic treatment applied as early as possible in cases with localized tumour. The advent of Platinum [2], the results obtained in metastatic tumours by some associations with Platinum and those obtained in localized tumours by chemotherapy-radiotherapy [3] have been promising. Many phase II studies have shown that surgery was feasible after 2 or 3 cycles of chemotherapy [4, 8] even thought 1 of them [9] had observed a high rate of progression after chemotherapy which prevented surgery.

The aims of this study were to assess the advantages of surgical thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy. Two 16-patient groups (thoracotomy, thoracoscopy) were compared. They were equivalent with regards to technique, age, etiology and lung dystrophy. Patients were called by phone to evaluate the surgical and functional results. The questionnaire was filled out by an independent physician who ignored the surgical technique used. Hospital stay was 7 +/- 2 days for thoracoscopy versus 11.5 +/- 5 days for thoracotomy (p0.003). During the J30 to J60 period of time, pain was mild in 94% of thoracoscopy cases and severe or unbearable in 69% of thoracotomy cases (p0.002). Mobility of the shoulder was fully recovered in all thoracoscopy patients within the first month versus only 62% of recovery at 3 months in the thoracotomy group (p0.0001). Working was possible at 1 +/- 0.8 month in the thoracoscopy group versus 2.6 +/- 0.8 months in the thoracotomy group (p0.002). Leisure activities were resumed at 2 +/- 1 month in the thoracoscopy group versus 4 +/- 1 months in the thoracotomy group (p0.0005). Only one relapse occurred in the thoracoscopy group. Thoracoscopy prevents the drawbacks of thoracotomy but keeps the same efficiency in the treatment of pneumothorax.

Amiodarone (Am) pneumonitis is currently a common and potentially severe adverse reaction, the accurate diagnosis of which remains difficult to establish.To determine the contribution of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in the diagnostic workup of patients suspected of having Am pneumonitis.Diagnosis of Am pneumonitis was established on the basis of (1) development of recent symptoms and pulmonary opacities while receiving the drug, (2) exclusion of other possible causes, and (3) improvement following cessation of Am and/or steroid therapy. (4) Confirmatory changes were obtained by histopathologic examination in eight cases. BAL was performed in each patient at the time of initial evaluation.Am pneumonitis was diagnosed in 15 consecutive patients between 1985 and 1991. The disease was associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Six patients died; four died of Am pneumonitis. A neutrophilic BAL was found in nine patients (average PMN = 26.6 percent). A mixed pattern (lymphocytic + neutrophilic) was seen in four patients (average: Ly = 19.9 percent; PMN = 11.9 percent). Two patients had a normal BAL. No patient had a lymphocytic pattern. A low CD4+/CD8+ ratio was seen in two patients. A literature survey indicated 70 cases of Am pneumonitis with detailed information on BAL. The BAL pattern was mixed in 23 (33 percent), neutrophilic in 18 (26 percent), lymphocytic in 15 (21 percent), and normal in 14 (20 percent). No correlation was found between BAL pattern and prognosis. Also, BAL pattern was related neither to daily or total dose of Am nor to duration of treatment with Am.The cellular profile of BAL in Am pneumonitis is highly variable, and no cellular pattern of BAL seems to be predictive of a detrimental outcome or of irreversible fibrosis. Aside from excluding other illnesses, and due to its extreme variability, the contribution of BAL differential in the initial workup of patients suspected of having Am pneumonitis is limited.