11 results on '"J. Aspegren"'
Search Results
2. Bioavailability of detomidine administered sublingually to horses as an oromucosal gel
- Author
-
L. Tamm, S. Hyyppä, J. S. Salonen, J. Aspegren, and H. Kaukinen
- Subjects
Pharmacology ,Detomidine ,General Veterinary ,Chemistry ,Sedation ,Absorption (skin) ,Crossover study ,Sublingual administration ,Bioavailability ,Route of administration ,Anesthesia ,medicine ,medicine.symptom ,Intramuscular injection ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Kaukinen, H., Aspegren, J., Hyyppa, S., Tamm, L., Salonen, J. S. Bioavailability of detomidine administered sublingually to horses as an oromucosal gel. J. vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 34, 76–81. The objective of the study was to determine the absorption, bioavailability and sedative effect of detomidine administered to horses as an oromucosal gel compared to intravenous and intramuscular administration of detomidine injectable solution. The study was open and randomized, with three sequences crossover design. Nine healthy horses were given 40 μg/kg detomidine intravenously, intramuscularly or administered under the tongue with a 7-day wash-out period between treatments. Blood samples were collected before and after drug administration for the measurement of detomidine concentrations in serum. The effects of the route of administration on heart rate and rhythm were evaluated and the depth of sedation assessed. Mean (±SD) bioavailability of detomidine was 22% (±5.3%) after sublingual administration and 38.2% (±7.9%) after intramuscular administration. The sedative effects correlated with detomidine concentrations regardless of the route of administration. We conclude that less detomidine is absorbed when given sublingually than when given intramuscularly, because part of it does not reach the circulation. Sublingual administration of detomidine oromucosal gel at 40 μg/kg produces safe sedation in horses. Slow absorption leads to fewer and less pronounced adverse effects than the more rapid absorption after intramuscular injection.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Safety and tolerability of long-term treatment with darolutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Jones RH, Fizazi K, James ND, Tammela TL, Matsubara N, Priou F, Beuzeboc P, Lesimple T, Bono P, Kataja V, Garcia JA, Protheroe A, Shore N, Aspegren J, Joensuu H, Kuss I, Fiala-Buskies S, and Vjaters E
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Aged, Middle Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Treatment Outcome, Sulfonamides adverse effects, Sulfonamides administration & dosage, Sulfonamides therapeutic use, Androgen Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use, Androgen Receptor Antagonists adverse effects, Androgen Receptor Antagonists administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects, Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant drug therapy, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant pathology, Pyrazoles adverse effects, Pyrazoles therapeutic use, Pyrazoles administration & dosage, Neoplasm Metastasis
- Abstract
Background: In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, darolutamide was well tolerated for 25 months, but minimal long-term safety data are available., Methods: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for patients receiving darolutamide for a median of 38 months (n = 13) are described in this pooled analysis of individual patient data from phase 1/2 studies., Results: All patients reported TEAEs (mostly grade 1/2). The most common TEAEs were diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea. Serious TEAEs were reported in six patients (none related to darolutamide). All treatment-related TEAEs (n = 5) were grade 1., Conclusions: Long-term darolutamide treatment was well tolerated; no new safety signals observed. In patients with mCRPC, long-term darolutamide treatment was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed. These findings are consistent with previous reports, demonstrating a favorable safety and tolerability profile of darolutamide., (© 2023. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Nanoparticle-based oral formulation can surprise you with inferior in vivo absorption in humans.
- Author
-
Singhal M, Turunen E, Ahtola-Sätilä T, Aspegren J, Bratty JR, Fuhr R, Ojala K, van Veen B, and Peltonen L
- Subjects
- Administration, Oral, Biological Availability, Excipients, Humans, Particle Size, Polymers, Solubility, Nanoparticles
- Abstract
Particle size reduction leads to an increase in the drug dissolution rate, which in turn can lead to a substantial increase in the bioavailability of a poorly soluble compound. To improve bioavailability, a practically insoluble investigational drug, ODM-106, was nanomilled and capsule formulations with three different drug amounts were prepared for the first-in-man study. Fast in vitro dissolution was achieved from all the capsules containing different amounts of drug nanoparticles but in the clinical study, surprisingly, low bioavailability was observed from the highest capsule strength (100 mg) in comparison to a lower strength (10 mg). In order to study further the discrepant in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC), a discriminative dissolution method was developed. It was noticed that the degree of supersaturation increased significantly as the stabilizers' concentration within the dried nanoformulations was increased. Hypromellose provided a physical barrier between nanoparticles to prevent aggregation during drying. SLS on the other hand improved wettability and provided supersaturation. The drug load, nanoparticle/polymer/surfactant/filler ratios and selected drying step were discovered to be critical to the nanoformulations' performance. Aggregation of nanoparticles, in the absence of optimal stabilizer concentration, compromised dissolution due to decreased surface area. In conclusion, the early development of a discriminative dissolution method and cautious selection of the nanoparticle/polymer ratio before manufacturing clinical batches is recommended., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Tasipimidine-the pharmacological profile of a novel orally active selective α 2A -adrenoceptor agonist.
- Author
-
Lehtimäki J, Jalava N, Unkila K, Aspegren J, Haapalinna A, and Pesonen U
- Subjects
- Animals, Cricetinae, Cricetulus, Male, Mice, Rats, Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists pharmacology, Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-1 metabolism, Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2
- Abstract
The pharmacological profile of tasipimidine, a novel orally active α
2 -adrenoceptor agonist developed for situational anxiety and fear in dogs, was studied in various in vitro and in vivo models. In the cell assays, tasipimidine demonstrated binding affinity and full agonism on the human α2A -adrenoceptors with a pEC50 of 7.57, while agonism on the α2B -and α2C -adrenoceptors and the rodent α2D -adrenoceptor was weaker, resulting in pEC50 values of 6.00, 6.29 and 6.56, respectively. Tasipimidine had a low binding affinity on the human α1 -adrenoceptors. It had no functional effects in the LNCaP cells expressing endogenously the human α1A -adrenoceptors but was a weak agonist in the Chem-1 cells coexpressing Gα15 protein and α1A -adrenoceptors. In the recombinant CHO cells, although tasipimidine was a weak partial agonist in the inositol monophosphate accumulation assay, it was a full agonist in the intracellular [Ca2+ ] assay. No functional effects were observed on the human α1B -adrenoceptor, whereas in the rat α1A and α1B -adrenoceptors, tasipimidine was a weak partial agonist. In the rat vas deferens preparations, tasipimidine was a full agonist on the α2D -adrenoceptor but weak partial agonist on the α1 -adrenoceptor. The receptor profile of tasipimidine indicated few secondary targets, and no functional effects were observed. Sedative effects of tasipimidine were demonstrated in vivo by the reduced acoustic startle reflex in rats with subcutaneous doses and decreased spontaneous locomotor activity in mice with subcutaneous and higher oral doses. It may be concluded that tasipimidine is an orally active and selective α2A -adrenoceptor agonist., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. First-in-human Phase 1 open label study of the BET inhibitor ODM-207 in patients with selected solid tumours.
- Author
-
Ameratunga M, Braña I, Bono P, Postel-Vinay S, Plummer R, Aspegren J, Korjamo T, Snapir A, and de Bono JS
- Subjects
- Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects, Antineoplastic Agents pharmacokinetics, Biological Availability, Blood Platelets drug effects, Breast Neoplasms drug therapy, Breast Neoplasms metabolism, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung metabolism, Drug Administration Schedule, Fatigue chemically induced, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy, Lung Neoplasms metabolism, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin drug therapy, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin metabolism, Male, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Melanoma drug therapy, Melanoma metabolism, Middle Aged, Neoplasms metabolism, Ovarian Neoplasms drug therapy, Ovarian Neoplasms metabolism, Oxazoles adverse effects, Oxazoles pharmacokinetics, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant drug therapy, Pyridines adverse effects, Pyridines pharmacokinetics, Quinolines adverse effects, Quinolines pharmacokinetics, Sarcoma drug therapy, Sarcoma metabolism, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma drug therapy, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma metabolism, Young Adult, Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage, Neoplasms drug therapy, Oxazoles administration & dosage, Proteins antagonists & inhibitors, Pyridines administration & dosage, Quinolines administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: Bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) proteins are reported to be epigenetic anti-cancer drug targets. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary anti-tumour activity of the BET inhibitor ODM-207 in patients with selected solid tumours., Methods: This was an open-label Phase 1 study comprised of a dose escalation part, and evaluation of the effect of food on pharmacokinetics. ODM-207 was administered orally once daily. The dose escalation part was initiated with a dose titration in the initial cohort, followed by a 3 + 3 design., Results: Thirty-five patients were treated with ODM-207, of whom 12 (34%) had castrate-resistant prostate cancer. One dose-limiting toxicity of intolerable fatigue was observed. The highest studied dose achieved was 2 mg/kg due to cumulative toxicity observed beyond the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) treatment window. Common AEs included thrombocytopenia, asthenia, nausea, anorexia, diarrhoea, fatigue, and vomiting. Platelet count decreased proportionally to exposure with rapid recovery upon treatment discontinuation. No partial or complete responses were observed., Conclusions: ODM-207 shows increasing exposure in dose escalation and was safe at doses up to 2 mg/kg but had a narrow therapeutic window., Clinical Trial Registration: The clinical trial registration number is NCT03035591.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Use of Detomidine Oromucosal Gel for Alleviation of Acute Anxiety and Fear in Horses: A Pilot Study.
- Author
-
Dai F, Rausk J, Aspegren J, Huhtinen M, Cannas S, and Minero M
- Abstract
The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group clinical field study was to evaluate the effect of detomidine oromucosal gel in alleviating anxiety and fear in horses. Sixteen horses with a history of acute anxiety and fear associated with firework-related noise entered the study. On New Year's Eve, eight horses were treated with 30 μg/kg detomidine gel and eight horses with placebo gel. When fireworks were present, 75% (6/8) of the detomidine-treated horses were scored by their owners as having a good or excellent treatment effect on anxiety and fear, while 50% (3/6) of horses receiving placebo were scored to have a good effect. Horses' behavior was video-recorded and assessed with a focal animal continuous method by a treatment-blind expert observer. Results showed that when fireworks were present, walking behavior decreased significantly ( p < 0.05) after treatment with detomidine and that horses of the placebo group, overall, showed more restlessness, vocalization, and signs of colic (Wilcoxon matched-pairs test on the first PC, p = 0.007). This study indicates that detomidine oromucosal gel can be used to alleviate acute noise-related anxiety and fear in horses, but larger treatment groups are needed to confirm the results., (Copyright © 2020 Dai, Rausk, Aspegren, Huhtinen, Cannas and Minero.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Safety and Antitumour Activity of ODM-201 (BAY-1841788) in Chemotherapy-naïve and CYP17 Inhibitor-naïve Patients: Follow-up from the ARADES and ARAFOR Trials.
- Author
-
Shore ND, Tammela TL, Massard C, Bono P, Aspegren J, Mustonen M, and Fizazi K
- Subjects
- Administration, Oral, Aged, Androgen Receptor Antagonists administration & dosage, Androgen Receptor Antagonists adverse effects, Disease Progression, Drug Monitoring methods, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prostate diagnostic imaging, Treatment Outcome, Bone Neoplasms pathology, Bone Neoplasms secondary, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions classification, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions diagnosis, Prostate-Specific Antigen analysis, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant blood, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant drug therapy, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant pathology, Pyrazoles administration & dosage, Pyrazoles adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: ODM-201, a new androgen receptor antagonist for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), demonstrated antitumour activity and acceptable tolerability in phase 1/2 trials., Objective: To determine the antitumour activity and safety profile of extended treatment with ODM-201 in men with mCRPC., Design, Setting, and Participants: ARADES and ARAFOR trials with ODM-201 enrolled chemotherapy-naïve and CYP17 inhibitor (CYP17i)-naïve mCRPC patients. Both trials had extended follow-up. Here we report results for chemotherapy-naïve and CYP17i-naïve patients from both trials (data cutoff October 2014 for ARADES and April 2015 for ARAFOR) after extended follow-up., Intervention: A total of 41 chemotherapy-naïve and CYP17i-naïve patients received oral ODM-201 twice daily (total daily dose of 1200, 1400 or 1800mg)., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Antitumour activity was assessed in terms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) declines and PSA/radiographic progression. Safety was assessed until disease progression and/or drug discontinuation due to any intolerable adverse event (AE)., Results and Limitations: ODM-201 safety data after a median treatment time of 13.5 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.7-15.6, interquartile range [IQR] 7.5-22.0) were similar to those reported in the main ARADES and ARAFOR trials. The overall AE incidence was 80.5% (n=33/41), with 58.5% (n=24/41) of patients experiencing only grade 1-2 AEs. The most common AEs were fatigue, back pain, diarrhoea, nausea, and pain in extremity. The median times to PSA and radiological progression were 12.4 mo (95% CI 6.3-18.2, IQR 5.5-22.0) and 15.3 mo (95% CI 9.5-not reached [NR], IQR 6.3-NR), respectively., Conclusions: Extended treatment with ODM-201 (1200-1800mg/d) was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns, and provided evidence of sustained antitumour activity in chemotherapy-naïve and CYP17i-naïve patients with mCRPC., Patient Summary: Prolonged treatment with high doses of ODM-201 was well tolerated and provided long-lasting disease control in patients with mCRPC. ODM-201 represents a therapeutic treatment option for mCRPC. The ARAFOR trial (including the follow-up stage) and the follow-up component of the ARADES trial are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as trial numbers NCT01784757 and NCT01429064., (Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Safety and Antitumour Activity of ODM-201 (BAY-1841788) in Castration-resistant, CYP17 Inhibitor-naïve Prostate Cancer: Results from Extended Follow-up of the ARADES Trial.
- Author
-
Fizazi K, Massard C, Bono P, Kataja V, James N, Tammela TL, Joensuu H, Aspegren J, and Mustonen M
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Androgen Antagonists adverse effects, Disease Progression, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pyrazoles adverse effects, Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase antagonists & inhibitors, Treatment Outcome, Androgen Antagonists administration & dosage, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant drug therapy, Pyrazoles administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: Patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) had extended responses to the androgen receptor antagonist ODM-201, in phase 1/2 studies., Objective: To evaluate the safety and antitumour activity of prolonged ODM-201 treatment in patients with CRPC., Design, Setting, and Participants: The ARADES trial was a multicentre phase 1 (dose escalation) and phase 2 (dose expansion) trial; 134 patients with CRPC were stratified by previous chemotherapy to receive ODM-201. This paper reports extended follow-up in CYP17 inhibitor (CYP17i)-naïve patients., Intervention: Patients (n=77) received oral ODM-201 twice daily at daily doses of 200-1800mg., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Safety, measured as the occurrence of adverse events (AEs), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and radiographic progression., Results and Limitations: The safety profile of extended ODM-201 treatment (median treatment duration 8.2 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.6-11.0) was consistent with that reported at the time of the original data cutoff in the main ARADES trial, with no unexpected safety concerns over time. The majority of AEs (61.1%) were mild (grade 1); the most common AE was fatigue/asthenia (35.1% of patients), with no clear relationship to ODM-201. Median time to PSA progression was 25.2 mo (95% CI 11.3-25.2) for chemotherapy-naïve men and not reached (NR; 95% CI 5.5-NR) for chemotherapy-pretreated patients; a trend for improved antitumour response was observed for chemotherapy-naïve patients. The median time to radiographic progression was longer for chemotherapy-naïve (14.0 mo, 95% CI 8.1-33.3) than for chemotherapy-pretreated (7.2 mo, 95% CI 2.7-11.0) patients., Conclusions: Prolonged exposure to ODM-201 was well tolerated, with no additional safety concerns; disease suppression was sustained, especially in chemotherapy-naïve patients. These data support further development of ODM-201 in men with CYP17i-naïve CRPC., Patient Summary: Extended ODM-201 therapy was well tolerated, with beneficial antitumour activity in men with advanced prostate cancer, indicating that ODM-201 may represent a new active treatment for men with CRPC. This extension trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) under identification number NCT01429064., (Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Bone Scan Index and Progression-free Survival Data for Progressive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Who Received ODM-201 in the ARADES Multicentre Study.
- Author
-
Reza M, Jones R, Aspegren J, Massard C, Mattila L, Mustonen M, Wollmer P, Trägårdh E, Bondesson E, Edenbrandt L, Fizazi K, and Bjartell A
- Abstract
Background: ODM-201, a new-generation androgen receptor inhibitor, has shown clinical efficacy in prostate cancer (PCa). Quantitative methods are needed to accurately assess changes in bone as a measurement of treatment response. The Bone Scan Index (BSI) reflects the percentage of skeletal mass a given tumour affects., Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of the BSI in metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC) patients undergoing treatment with ODM-201., Design, Setting, and Participants: From a total of 134 mCRPC patients who participated in the Activity and Safety of ODM-201 in Patients with Progressive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer clinical trial and received ODM-201, we retrospectively selected all those patients who had bone scan image data of sufficient quality to allow for both baseline and 12-wk follow-up BSI-assessments (n=47). We used the automated EXINI bone BSI software (EXINI Diagnostics AB, Lund, Sweden) to obtain BSI data., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: We used the Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier estimates to investigate the association among BSI, traditional clinical parameters, disease progression, and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS)., Results and Limitations: In the BSI assessments, at follow-up, patients who had a decrease or at most a 20% increase from BSI baseline had a significantly longer time to progression in bone (median not reached vs 23 wk, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.58; p=0.003) and rPFS (median: 50 wk vs 14 wk; HR: 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.74; p=0.006) than those who had a BSI increase >20% during treatment., Conclusions: The on-treatment change in BSI was significantly associated with rPFS in mCRPC patients, and an increase >20% in BSI predicted reduced rPFS. BSI for quantification of bone metastases may be a valuable complementary method for evaluation of treatment response in mCRPC patients., Patient Summary: An increase in Bone Scan Index (BSI) was associated with shorter time to disease progression in patients treated with ODM-201. BSI may be a valuable method of complementing treatment response evaluation in patients with advanced prostate cancer., (Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Activity and safety of ODM-201 in patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (ARADES): an open-label phase 1 dose-escalation and randomised phase 2 dose expansion trial.
- Author
-
Fizazi K, Massard C, Bono P, Jones R, Kataja V, James N, Garcia JA, Protheroe A, Tammela TL, Elliott T, Mattila L, Aspegren J, Vuorela A, Langmuir P, and Mustonen M
- Subjects
- Administration, Oral, Aged, Confidence Intervals, Disease-Free Survival, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness pathology, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Staging, Patient Safety, Patient Selection, Prognosis, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant pathology, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Androgen Receptor Antagonists pharmacology, Prostate-Specific Antigen blood, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant drug therapy, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant mortality, Pyrazoles pharmacology
- Abstract
Background: ODM-201 is a novel androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor designed to block the growth of prostate cancer cells through high-affinity binding to the AR and inhibition of AR nuclear translocation. This trial assessed ODM-201's safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer., Methods: The ARADES trial is an open-label phase 1-2 trial undertaken in 23 hospitals across Europe and USA with ongoing long-term follow-up. Men with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, who had castrate concentrations of testosterone and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0-1 were enrolled. In the phase 1 part of the trial, patients were given oral ODM-201 at a starting daily dose of 200 mg, which was increased to 400 mg, 600 mg, 1000 mg, 1400 mg, and 1800 mg. In phase 2, patients were randomly assigned centrally and stratified by previous chemotherapy and treatment with CPY17 inhibitors, to receive one of three daily doses of ODM-201 (200 mg, 400 mg, and 1400 mg). The primary endpoint in phase 1 was safety and tolerability, whereas in phase 2 it was the proportion of patients with a PSA response (50% or greater decrease in serum PSA) at week 12. All analyses included patients who had received at least one dose of ODM-201. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01317641, and NCT01429064 for the follow-up after 12 weeks., Findings: We enrolled patients between April 5, 2011, and March 12, 2013. In phase 1, 24 patients were enrolled to six sequential cohorts of three to six patients and received a daily dose of ODM-201, 200-1800 mg. No dose-limiting toxic effects were reported and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. In phase 1, three patients reported eight adverse events of grade 3 (fracture, muscle injury, laceration, paralytic ileus, pain, presyncope, urinary retention, and vomiting) and one patient had a grade 4 adverse event (lymphoedema). None of the grade 3-4 adverse events were deemed to be related to ODM-201. Of the phase 1 patients, the four who received 200 mg, seven who received 400 mg, and three who received 1400 mg entered the phase 2 part of the trial. In addition to these patients, 110 were randomly assigned to three groups: 200 mg (n=38), 400 mg (n=37), and 1400 mg (n=35). For these patients, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue or asthenia (15 [12%] of 124 patients), hot flush (six [5%]), and decreased appetite (five [4%]). One patient (<1%) had a grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse event (fatigue); no patients had a treatment-emergent grade 4 adverse event. 38 patients who received 200 mg, 39 who received 400 mg, and 33 who received 1400 mg were assessable for PSA response at 12 weeks. 11 (29%) patients in the 200 mg group, 13 (33%) in the 400 mg group, and 11 (33%) in the 1400 mg group had a PSA response at 12 weeks., Interpretation: Our results suggest that ODM-201 monotherapy in men with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer provides disease suppression and that ODM-201 has a favourable safety profile. These findings support further investigation of clinical responses with ODM-201 in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer., Funding: Orion Corporation Orion Pharma, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.