Search

The hen's egg test for analysis of micronucleus formation (HET-MN) was developed several years ago to provide an alternative test system to the in vivo micronucleus test. In order to assess its applicability and robustness, a study was carried out at the University of Osnabrueck (lab A) and at the laboratories of Henkel AG & Co. KGaA (lab B). Following transfer of the method to lab B, a range of test substances that had been pre-tested at lab A, were tested at Henkel: the genotoxins cyclophosphamide, dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, methotrexate, acrylamide, azorubin, N-nitroso-dimethylamine and the non-genotoxins, orange G and isopropyl myristate. In a second phase, additional compounds with known in vivo properties were examined in both labs: the non-genotoxin, ampicillin, the “irrelevant” positives, isophorone and 2,4-dichlorophenol (“irrelevant” means positive in standard in vitro tests, but negative in vivo), the clastogen p-chloroaniline, and the aneugens carbendazim and vinorelbine. All substances were correctly predicted in both labs with respect to their in vivo genotoxic properties, indicating that the HET-MN may have an improved predictivity compared with current standard in vitro test systems. The results support the promising role of the HET-MN assay as a supplement to existing test batteries.

Extensive research has been conducted over the past decades to develop alternatives to the rabbit eye irritation test (Draize test) used in a regulatory context to assess eye irritation potentials. Although no single in vitro test has emerged as being completely acceptable for full replacement, various tests are considered to be suitable and are regularly used to assess certain aspects. Amongst these, the Hen's Egg Test Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) has gained regulatory acceptance in various countries to classify severe eye irritants. In this retrospective study, historical eye irritation data (in vivo and in vitro) from 137 samples (approx. 75% non-irritants; 25% (severe) irritants) tested both in the HET-CAM and Draize eye test was compared with regard to the predicted eye irritation classes under the GHS and the traditional EU classification system (DSD).The overall concordance was in the range of 80-90%. A high specificity (96-98%, depending on the classification system and the chosen discrimination) but rather low sensitivity (48-65%) was observed. The study indicates that HET-CAM results are useful as part of weight-of-evidence assessments or in tiered approaches to assess eye irritation potentials rather than as stand-alone classification method.